1200AP 350 > Workgroup Bridge

Similar Questions

• LAPN300 Workgroup Bridge cannot be seen outside the local subnet

  Hi, I have a strange problem, I hope you can help with.

  I have the following in my network

  1 DSL Modem Router

  2 LAPN300 AP connected to [1] via ethernet

  3. another AP connected to [2] via the parameter Workgroup Bridge [2]

  All appear to be configured correctly, [2] shows that [3] is connected in the section of bridge of the workgroup of tha status page.

  When I connect a wireless [2] client I can ping [1] and [3] and an external address as Ecritel.net

  When I connect a customer [3] wireless I can ping [1] and [2] BUT cannot ping an external address

  All 3 cameras have manually set IP addresses x.x.x.254, x.x.x.253 and x.x.x.252

  only [1] has NAT and DHCP active.

  I already tried a different router [1] and a different access point [2] but get exactly the same result.

  Do you have an idea what I'm doing wrong or troubleshooting.

  Thank you

  LanceTyler wrote:

  Thank you chadster766

  Yes you are right. I had the network defined as

  Modem => LAPN300-online WAG120N

  I have now tested it as you suggested

  Modem => WAG120N-online LAPN300

  This has indeed fixed the problem.

  UnfortunatelyI cannot use this topology for my solution that I need the LAPN300 my AP central.

  Can you advise if there is another device that I can use instead of the WAG120N?

  If I buy another AP support WDS which will work with the LAPN300?

  Is there some other wifi feature that I should be looking, or should I just get a wifi Extender?

  I need the final configuration to be like

  Modem-ethernet online => LAPN300-wifi-AP online online? -Online wifi-online PC Client

  Thank you for your expertise.

  I would recommend either a LAPN300\600 or if your budget can support a LAPAC2600 which is newer Linksys AP.

  You can continue to use Workgroup Bridge or WDS. They both should work. I don't know which protocols are better.

• Wired Wireless Bridge number of clients

  For test purposes I have a wireless (not workgroup) bridge to talk to an AP 1200 and I want to know how many cable customers can be supported (I know that the working group limit is 8).

  Main network - AP == radio == WGB - Hub - 1 PC

  To place a PC & hub I want to have a whole building full of switches & PCs. Is this possible? If not, how about with 2 bridges wireless talk between them, instead of the combination of the AP/WB.

  WGB = WorkGroup Bridge. The WGB352 is limited to 8 wired customers. You can get a little wiggle room by setting the time of aging up to a few seconds so that inactive customers aren't taking up slots, but that won't get you a building has a value of connectivity.

  You need different hardware to accomplish what you have proposed. List of AIR-BR1310 at $1299, the same as the 350 bridge and much less than the 1400s.

• WiFi AR5007 802. 11 b / g adapter cannot talk about bridge WET11 Wireless on the same subnet

  Hello

  My HP Compaq Presario C700 VISTA laptop (a AR5007 802. 11 b / g WiFi adapter) and the printer are on the same subnet. The laptop is WiFi connected to my WRT54G2 router/switch and the printer is connected to the workgroup switch that connects to the router via the LinkSys WET11 Wireless Bridge.

  The installer works fine for over a year until he was there when my VISTA does not see any PC on the Working Group 3 weeks pass including the printer. However, the WAN access is not affected.

  I did the filming of following problems (in order):

  1. check the network settings on the laptop VISTA (x.x.x.29) and (x.x.x.201) printer and all look kosher.    (All my PC including notebook computer and printer have IP STATIC)

  2. check the router and the parameters of bridge and fines all eyes (router - XXX1, bridge - x.x.x.140).

  3 Ping printer, bridge, and other PC and received messages "Destination Unreachable Host" or "Request timed out". Although all are on the same subnet. Pingée router is OK.

  4 remove and re-add the wireless profile and tried to connect again. Same problem, no joy!

  5 started VISTA in safe MODE with NETWORK. Once again, the problem has persisted but at least eliminated applications as a potential source of problems.

  6. recycled power switch/router/workgroup bridge. No joy!

  7 WiFi connected other laptops to the same router (WRT54G2) and can ping other PC and printer END.    This means that the problem is limited to my VISTA laptop.

  8 given that the problem is on my VISTA and applications are not the source (see #5) of the problem, then probably the AR5007 802.11b.g wireless network card driver is original so I downloaded driver at HP and installed with version 7.3.201.25.  Problem is persistent...  Arhhh!

  Could there be something else that I missed? Can someone please help.

  Thank you

  You are the very welcome, John.

  Yes this driver will work fine on Vista Home Premium.

  According to the notes on the driver, it can just be run without uninstalling the current pilot you have on there now.

  After executing, you can confirm it 'takes' by going into Device Manager, expand network adapters, click the atheros wireless card, click the driver tab and you should see the installed version 2011.

• straingage

  Is it possible to measure the Wheatstone 350 Ohm bridge (cell) using PCIe-6341 with SCB-68 is?  Can I use the digital + 5V for high voltage of excitation and digital terrain for low voltage?  Then I will use 2 analog inputs, measure the Vo and the other to measure Vex.

  Yes, its 'possible', but I would NOT recommend this implementation:

  (1.) the digital outputs are intended to the inputs high impedance (minimize sources of supply)

  2.) voltage output digital is not regulated; Consequently, even using the lowest +/-0, 2V range to read not amplified voltage bridge, your measurements would be changed with the excitement of bridge unregulated.

  So yes, it should work, but I'm not sure of the repetitiveness or mistake induced your measurements.  In addition, if you have been other bike digital outputs on and outside, which would induce probably a change to the excitement as well.

  A better implementation would be with a map of pledge OR deformation or third strain gage conditioner/amplifier

  (e.g. DataForth)

  PEI

  Edited: grammar

• Set up the AIR-AP1231G-A-K9 for WGB (IOS 12.4 JA (13d)

  Hello

  I'm trying to set up one of our extra 1231 AP as a workgroup bridge. The AP has been configured as a lightweight access point so I think maybe that's part of my question.

  It was the documentation that I found to do the config: http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/12.4_3g_JA/configuration/guide/s43hot.html

  However, I don't have the available commands that they list.

  Here is HS worm info:

  Cisco IOS software, C1200 software (C1200-K9W8-M), Version 12.4 (13d) JA, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2)

  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

  Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

  Last updated Saturday, February 8 08 17:24 by prod_rel_team

  SWN-e9-wh-01-SWAP #config t

  Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.

  SWN-e9-wh-01-SWAP (config) #int dot

  SWN-e9-wh-01-SWAP (config) #int dot11Radio 0

  SWN-e9-wh-01-SWAP(config-if) #stati?

  % Unrecognized command

  Is it not possible with the IOS and the AP I have?

  Hi Eric,.

  I'm just curious, did you convert the AP to IOS already?

  This can be converted to a standalone/stand alone AP you want;

  Here is a method of conversion;

  Returning to standalone Access Point

  You can convert an access point of the mode light return to autonomous mode by loading a Cisco IOS version that supports stand-alone mode (Cisco IOS release 12.3 (7) JA or earlier version). If the access point is associated with a controller, you can use the controller to load the version of Cisco IOS. If the access point is not associated with a controller, you can load the version of Cisco IOS using TFTP.

  By using a TFTP server to revert to a previous version

  Follow these steps to return mode LWAPP stand-alone mode by loading a version of Cisco IOS using a TFTP server:

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Step 1 the IP address of the computer on which the server software runs TFTP should range from 10.0.0.2 to 10.0.0.30.

  Step 2 make sure the PC contains the file access point (for example, c1200-k9w7 - tar.122 - 15.JA.tar for a 1200 Series access point) in the TFTP server folder and the TFTP server is activated.

  Step 3 Rename the access point image file in the folder of the TFTP server c1200-k9w7 - tar.default for a series of 1200 point, c1130-k9w7 - tar.default of access for a series of 1130 access point and c1240-k9w7 - tar.default for a series of 1240 access point.

  Step 4 connect the PC to the access point using an Ethernet category 5 cable (CAT5).

  Step 5 disconnect the power to the access point.

  Step 6 push the MODE button and hold the button while you reconnect power to the access point.

  Step 7 hold the MODE button until the status of the LED turns red (approximately 20 to 30 seconds), then release.

  Step 8 wait until restarting access point, as indicated by the LEDs become green followed the status LED flashes green.

  Step 9 after the access point reboots, reconfigure using the GUI or the CLI.

  I hope this helps!

  Rob

• WLC 5760 with AP1121G

  Guys,

  I ve got a thing who me it s kinda weird. I m trying to make a working group with wlc 5760 and an 1100 AP mode standalone, but all I get it s this error to the AP.

  * 18:45:05.639 1 Oct: % DOT11-4-CANT_ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, cannot associate: WPAIE not found and required

  * 18:46:03.639 1 Oct: % DOT11-4-CANT_ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, cannot associate: Rcvd response of the channel 11 8861 0c68.03ea.4073

  * 18:47:47.639 1 Oct: % DOT11-4-CANT_ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, cannot associate: combining

  configurations are:

  SSID dot11 TEST

  open authentication

  authentication wpa key management

  WPA - psk ascii 7 1416000E0F0C2379747960

  interface Dot11Radio0

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  encryption ciphers aes - ccm mode

  SSID TEST

  base speed - 1.0 2.0 basic basic-5, 5 6.0 9.0 basic-11, 0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0

  station-role workgroup bridge

  Bridge-Group 1

  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people

  and on the WLC 5760,

  WLAN TEST 7 TEST

  No ssid broadcast

  customer vlan 7

  no security wpa akm dot1x

  Security wpa psk key set ascii 0 arechi2013 akm

  session-timeout 1800

  no downtime

  Sho wlan name TEST

  Security

  802.11 authentication: open system

  The static WEP keys: disabled

  802. 1 X: disabled

  Wi - Fi Protected Access (WPA/WPA2): enabled

  WPA (SSN IE): disabled

  WPA2 (RSN IE): enabled

  TKIP encryption algorithm: disabled

  AES encryption algorithm: enabled

  Management key auth

  802. 1 x: disabled

  PSK: enabled

  CCKM: disabled

  CKIP: disabled

  Can someone help me?

  1121 are not supported.  Here's a matrix showing which is taken in charge and what is not.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/wireless/controller/5500/tech_notes/Wireless_Software_Compatibility_Matrix.html#wp98682

  Thank you

  Scott

  Help others by using the rating system and marking answers questions as 'response '.

• What specific frequency is a bridge (802 .11b) wireless aironet 350 grave?

  Hello

  I would like to ask what specific frequency, a bridge (802 .11b) wireless aironet 350 fall?

  This will serve as a requirement on a permit from the Government that I am processing. I was invited by the Govt. Department of communication on what specific frequency band 2400-2483, 5 MHz is aironet 350 fall.

  Any inputs on this is much appreciated.

  Kind regards

  udimpas

  Depend on the chain located on the bridge. 802 11 b (as g) to 11 frequencies in the United States.

  2412 Mhz, 2417, 2422, 2427, 2432, 2437, 2442, 2447, 2452, 2457, 2462.

  2412 is channel 1, 2437 is channel 6, 2462 is channel 11

• Last 8.3.102.0 - Workgroup (JWG) Bridge downstream broadcast Code on several VLANs

  Am I reading this correctly, it's essentially support .1q trunks over WGB links?

  Yes, in order to support broadcast transmission on VLAN not native.

  Read below

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/wireless/controller/8-3/config-guide/b_cg83/b_cg83_chapter_01110110.html#id_32817

  GTC - mvlan.png

  

  HTH

  Rasika

  Pls note all useful responses *.

• Confusion about the Source of excitement in the bridge SMU-4331 input module

  Hello

  I had some confusion through the input of the bridge SMU-4331 sheet module.

  In the features section of excitement, its current Minimum as 29mA says. What it means. It can only current greater than 29mA delivery!

  

  I think this should me Maximum current specification.

  If you look at the table below

  

  350 ohm resistance, the current should be 10V/350 ohm = 28.5mA

  but for 1 K ohm, current will me 10V/1Kohm = 10mA, which isn't normal, if you specify current minimum as 29mA.

  any thoughts?

  Kind regards

  Mirash

  Hello Mirash,

  I'm glad I could help!

  As for your other question, the SMU-4330/4331 are inherently peripheral ratiometric.  This means that they are designed to detect the level of excitement and range of the ADC to the appropriate scale.  In this way, we can compensate for permanent changes in the voltage.  One of our engineers wrote a big article really nice area on the subject I would recommend that you take a look at: Sensors of Measuring Bridge-Based with the ratiometric approach

  See you soon,.

• load cell 9237 + full-bridge: load cell_null_off_shuntcal.vi - error 200077

  I try to use load_cell_null_off_shuntcal.vi with load cell (Honeywell model 31, not amplified). I'm using LabView 8.6, cDAQ-9172 and NI9237. Entries: excitation10V internal; mV/V 2.1492 (calib. bin); weight 10 lbs max. resistance bridge 350 ohms (Honeywell specifications); 9237 internal shunt resistance 100 kohm; map of shunt R4 (default setting). Selected "offset null" and "shunt cal.

  Error-200077 occurred to Shunt calibration perform DAQmx
  . VI:1 (bridge) or the possible reasons:

  Measurements: Requested value is not a supported value for
  This property.

  Property: I. Bridge.ShuntCal.GainAdjust

  You asked:-61.980405e3

  Valid values begin with: 500.0e - 3

  Valid values ending with: 1.500000

  If "shunt cal' green button not selected, no error. Setting the gain should be about 1. Subvi DAQmx PerformShuntCalibration (bridge) .vi contains "Call library function node" which is locked (?).

  Any ideas?

  What is the location of item correct shunt for a full-bridge load cell? Change this location does not eliminate the error.

  Hello, YTC,.

  The problem is most likely in your external connections of the NI 9237 and the load cell.  As mentioned in NI 9237 Operating Instructions and specifications, page 9, SC + SC - pins must be connected to the terminals of the resistance specified in the .vi of Shunt calibration perform DAQmx (bridge) (in the case of a full bridge, it would be R3).

  Let me know if you still have problems with your calibration.

• 1400 series 802. 11 a bridge with Catalyst 3524 switch?

  According to the documentation below, "you cannot provide redundant power to 1100 and 1200 access points with the two power DC to its port and inline power from a patch panel or powered switch to the access point Ethernet port'. How about the 1400 series bridges? You can use a power injector to power and also connect it to a catalyst 3524 switch (WS-C3524-PWR-XL-EN)? He will know not to draw power from the switch? Or should it be plugged into a hub, and the hub plugged into the switch? Or what would be the recommended configuration? 3524 switch already has 350 access points and a trendy 350 bridge. What would be the risks, if any, plug the bridge 1400 series also in the switch so that it is also a power injector-shoot?

  Thanks for the tips!

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/wireless/ps458/prod_release_note09186a00801d0607.html

  Use the power only one Option

  "You cannot provide redundant power to 1100 and 1200 access points with the two power DC to its port and inline power from a patch panel or powered switch to the Ethernet port on the access point. If you are using power to the access point from the two sources, the switch connection control panel or power could close the port to which the access point is connected. Figure 1 illustrates the configuration of power, which can stop the port on the Panel of brewing or powered switch.

  "Figure 1 bad power Configuration with the help of two Power Sources

  "Operating Radio 5 GHz requires power injector, power Module or Catalyst 3550-24 PWR Switch

  "The series 1200 power injector and power module support operation 1200 series of the 5 GHz in the access point radio." Currently, the Catalyst 3550-24 PWR switch supports power for radio 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz radio. other switches and power patch panels could provide not enough power for the 5 GHz radio.

  "Access point requires 1200 Series universal power supply and power injector.

  "The 350 series universal power supply and power injector are not compatible with the 1200 Series access point. If you use a power injector or a power module to power a series 1200 access point, you must use a universal power supply series 1200. If you need to use an injector to power to inject into the access point Ethernet port, you must use a power injector 1200 series. »

  The power injector is between the switch and access point online. If your power injector fails, you have lost connectivity to the switch anyway. And to power from a device to a switchport works only if they are directly linked together; You can't have any other intermediate devices in the path.

  In short: No. is not a matter of being a bad idea, it is not be possible to try again.

• Switch 'VMnet0"of VMware WS, invited bridges to the"VirtualBox networking"adapter instead of the WiFi adapter.

  Hi Chaps and Chapettes.

  HP dm1-3125ed (portable slim and light)

  AMD E-350

  8 GB OF DDR3 MEMORY

  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit

  VMware Workstation 6.5.5 build 328052

  Early in the afternoon, I decided to try VirtualBox for Linux 3D hardware acceleration. (Just keep your axes down at the moment. )

  I did not have a lot of time and did not check on the incompatibilities or traps.

  So I first created a restore point (thankfully).

  Then I downloaded and installed VirtualBox and the Oracle expansion pack.

  Rebooted, created a virtual machine and booted up with 'linuxmint-11-gnome-dvd - 64-bit .iso' (Ubuntu 11.04 based Gnome distribution).

  But its kernel panicked. VirtualBox couln t even start in the direct environment. So I have a few minutes of research and found the following. Incompatibility of VirtualBox with the AMD E-350 combo and 64-bit clients. VMware Workstation 6.5.5 did not have this problem, it is compatible because I'd have successfully installed earlier, but there no hardware-accelerated 3D for Linux guests.

  http://forums.VirtualBox.org/viewtopic.php?f=6 & t = 39361

  http://www.VirtualBox.org/ticket/8824

  So, I removed the VirtualBox VM, but left the installed program.

  But an hour later or if I needed a script in a VMware WS VM test and debugging.

  Only network connectivity between the 3 currents of Fords VM. Any other dead "Destination host unreachable".

  No interaction bewteen the windows host and guests, no interaction between the clients and the internet.

  But these 3 guys could ping each other and push files between them.

  "Route - n", "route - ve", "mii-tool" and "mii-tool - v" looked as expected. Nothing weird. "mii-tool - r" even started a successful auto-negotiation.

  I tried a lot of other things. All the time, I knew that it was something to do with VirtualBox, because it was the only change made to the system.

  Then, after 4 hours or more , the light bulb lit.

  If these 3 guys could only talk to each other, they must be on a separate network. : rolleyes:

  All the time that I had seen this "VirtualBox networking" adapter in the network and sharing Center. Just above VMnet1 and VMnet8.

  I closed, 3 guests and closed VMware WS. Then disabled the card of "VirtualBox networking" in "the change map settings.

  After shooting WS and 3 guests again, all 3 could interact with the host Windows and internet.

  So I stop invited and WS closed again. And activated the "VirtualBox networking" adapter again.

  Inflamed WS once again, and all the VMS had lost interaction with the internet and their host.

  It looks like VMnet0 ("the bridge to an adapter automatically chosen") automatically connected to the «VirtualBox networking» map

  But I think I understand car VMnet0 bridging behavior (for example):

  eth0 (map virtiual) <>- VMnet0 (virtual switch) <>- Ralink RT5390 Wireless adapt (physical map)

  eth1 (map virtiual) <>- VMnet0 (virtual switch) <>- Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller adapter (physical map)

  So, always one side of VMnet0 virtual and material on the other side.

  Linking the two sides practically, is almost like behavior VMnet1: "network invited only"...

  But apparently, VMnet0 connects on a first come, first served, during the collection of adapters?

  Even after several reboots, VMnet0 is always connected to "VirtualBox networking."

  Is it possible to have the "VirtualBox networking" card activated AND prevent this unwanted switching happen?

  I also hope it helps others lose as much time as I did...

  I couldn't write these 4 hours lost on my timesheet. But they would more than cover the price of upgrade for both of my WS to WS7 licenses.

  (You may know axe me.) )

  disable automatic bypass with virtual network Editor

  virtual hubs (vmnets) make no difference if they are connected to a network phsical card or to an other nic installed by VBox - virtal this is why you need to specify which card you want to fill vmnet0

• In network bridge does not, because of NAT

  Hello

  I am able to access the net with NAT, but not with the bridged network.

  Please advise.

  Thank you

  Office 7.0.0 build 203739

  Dell Inspiron 14

  Intel Su7300

  4056 MB DDR3 RAM

  350 GB at 7200 RPM

  Windows 7 Home Edition Premium, 64 (Build 7600) 6.1.7600

  Ther were rumors this interface brigded in only possible via ethernet, not through wireless. Don't know whethet, she is always real or not.

  ---

  Paul Svirin

  Software developer StarWind ( http://www.starwindsoftware.com )

• I5-650 upgrade to i7 - 875 or wait for Ivy Bridge-E to be released?

  Then, when I bought my current motherboard, my upgrade path has been my i5-650, which is quite slow, to an i7. I've been waiting for a while for the price to drop on the i7-875, but they remain still at the 350-$ 400 (US) level. I like the i7-875 because it has unlocked. I have a Noctura C12P cooler, I initially intended to buy a unlocked i7 and overclock a little. Unfortunately my i5-650 has no an unlocked multiplier. I knew that when I bought it, but at the point where I expected to be able to upgrade the processor in the year. I did not yet as I used to be an editor very novist - now I'm at an intermediate level and my slow processor has really started to bother me.

  However, now I think that it would be better to wait for the Ivy Bridge-E, which from what I've read so far, should be a processor 8-core complete. This will allow me to take advantage of the four memory channels (my i5 only supports dual channel), a better CPU socket as the 2011, much more big cache on die CPU itself and of course the 8 cores that will be 4 times the physical cores that I have now. I'll also be able to update my motherboard if I leave with a new processor, which would be nice because my EVGA P55 THE limit myself to only 16 GB of memory, 4 x 4 gigs. When I built my rig, two years ago, 16 concerts seemed to be quite similar. Now, I know that I need 32 or maybe 64, so I need a motherboard that offers 8 DIMM slots - mine has only four.

  I'll have to wait about a year or two, depending on when Intel finally released Ivy Bridge-E, but I'm OK with it if it means a significant improvement in my render times. Now that I'm loading individual clips with many effects, color correction, etc... I see a lot more red in my calendar and I'm tired of waiting for the previews made and so I can back to work.

  Any thoughts on the Ivy Bridge-E and its release date, etc...? All I can find is that it is delayed until the third quarter of 2013, which is nearly a year away, but if the new format of 22nm chip is worth the wait, I will be willing to wait rather than take an intermediate step and then spend again in less than a year...

  Thank you!

  The upgrade should be based on what makes more sense than your workloads. From this moment you can already buy a motherboard Socket 2011 as there dropping in support of 8-processor Core (they are already avaiblible under the line of Xeon from Intel that is supported on the boards as the WS P9X79 which work as well consumer CPUs (Sandy Bridge (E). The difficult situation you're is you pushcaeed a platform that had a quick u-turn socket wise so upgrade has become limited and the cost of the CPU for the platform.

  At least with the 2011 Socket which is not goin anywhere any time soon. Ultimately, you must make the call whether to move your Board and CPU currently to something that will provide a significant increase in performance as a X 79 part of card with even the quad core (3820) or wait to get a piece of 8 native hearts which is already avaiblible with references of Xeon. Do not forget that there is a cost of considerble delta by adopting a 8 on the side of Intel processor.

  I hope this helps. Enjoy the rest of your day!