A damaged adapter will cause battery at no charge?

Similar Questions

• Battery won't charge properly on a Satellite A series

  Hello

  I still have a problem with my battery.
  First of all my original battery is damaged.
  The computer showed first 100% load and a minute later it was zero. So I thought, ok my battery is damaged.

  I buyed a new. Now I have installed the battery, a few days ago, and my battery is only at 60% load.
  Is it possible, that my charger in laptop computer is damaged?

  The battery must be charged in an hour I think. That would be good.
  Someone know a problem like this?

  Oxford

  Hello

  > The battery must be charged in an hour I think. That would be good.
  This is not correct in general charge time depends on the laptop model and the battery. But usually it takes more than an hour at full load.
  Check your manual. It should be mentioned on the battery charge time.

  In your case, I'll try to load and discharge the battery several times and then check the status of the battery.

  Concerning

• a defective battery in a tablet will cause performance problems of speed

  a defective battery in a tablet will cause a matter of output speed

  Hello

  Sometimes it can cause a performance problem, visit the following link to monitor how to take care of the battery:

  Taking care of your laptop battery

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/taking-care-of-your-laptop-battery

  In order to increase the performance of Windows XP please visit the link below:

  Windows XP performance

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb457057.aspx

  Reference: PC slow? Optimize your computer for peak performance

  http://www.Microsoft.com/athome/Setup/optimize.aspx

  Note: as long, the Tablet is connected to a power source it shouldn't affect the performance in itself. However, bad battery itself a performance problem.

• Unable to determine the type of AC power adapter. Your system will run more slowly and the battery won't charge.

  I get the error message is: AC power adapter type cannot be determined. Your system will run more slowly and the battery won't charge.

  Hello
  (1) when you receive this error message?
  (2) what is the brand and model of your computer?
  (3) did you change on your computer before this problem?
  It seems that the adapter has gone wrong, I suggest you to connect another card and see if the problem still occurs.
  You can also contact the computer manufacturer for assistance on this issue.

• The modernization Pavilion dv8t 16 GB memory will cause problems?

  I have a HP Pavilion dv8t Quad Edition Series Notebook PC, product number: VF836AV. The maximum amount of memory that can be installed in it is 8 GB, according to the operating instructions. I recently replaced the original 8 GB with 16 GB of memory, and the 16 GB is recognized automatically. The Windows system information report now shows that the installed physical memory is 16.0 GB and total physical memory is 16.0 GB. In addition, the original memory installed in the PC has been Crucial DDR3 PC3-10600 of type, and I replaced it with a Crucial DDR3 PC3-12800 memory of type. However, the newly installed 12800 DDR3 memory does not work at its full rated speed, it runs at the same speed as the original memory. There seems to be no problem with the configuration of the improved memory, but I can't help but wonder why the manual (and even Crucial memory Advisory tool) says that the maximum installed memory should be 8 GB. Memory of 16 GB currently installed will cause damage or some other problem in the long term?

  Hello:

  A few other people have installed 16 GB of memory in their notebooks with 1st generation i7 quad cores and reported no problems at all.

  I would be not the least bit concerned the performance of 16 GB in your mobile life.

  The reason why that memory does not run at 1600 MHz is...

  Memory can only run as fast as the processor FSB speed which, in the case of yours is 1333 MHz (10600).

  If the 12800 memory simply downlclocked to match the speed of the processor.

  Not until you get to the Intel 3rd generation I series with an Intel 7 series chipset processors memory runs at 1600 MHz.

  So there is nothing wrong at all to your situation.

• Inspiron 5748 - new battery, do not charge, new adapter not recognised...jack/socket or Win10 problem?

  Battery does not charge in my Inspiron 5748 - Intel [email protected] / 8 GB RAM / 1 TB drive / two years. I replaced the charger and the battery but the problem persists. I've seen on other mobile messages and wonder if this could be a problem with the connector/plug (between the adapter and laptop), and if I could replace that? In addition, the problem seems to have started when we went from Win8.1 to Win10; would that be a problem?

  It is a hardware issue that will not be solved by a BIOS update.

  If the system is under warranty, call Dell for the repair or replacement of the adapter / power to the system.

  If it is out of warranty,

  1. try a new adapter Dell OEM.  It can solve the problem.

  2. in the case, replace the DC Jack:

  www.Parts-People.com/index.php

  3. If that does not resolve the problem, it is the motherboard that is defective and must be replaced.

• I have a mac book pro 2009 model, now when I try to load it, there is no green light on the adapter and the laptop does not charge. Not sure if there is a problem with the card or the battery or the laptop. Kindly help

  I have a Mac book pro 2009 model, when I try to load it it not there no green light on the adapter and he is in charge. Not sure if there is a problem with the adapter or the battery or the laptop. Kindly help... Thank you

  Have you tried:

  Portable Apple computers: Troubleshooting MagSafe adapters - Apple Support

  This is the Office Mac Pro forum. I asked that your post be moved to the MacBook Pro laptop forum.

• 9.3.1 IOS will cause questions to iPhones, because I have a lot of important things on my iPhone6 and iPod 5th generation I don't want to lose

  Update to 9.3.1 iOS will cause questions to my iPhome 6 and iPod 5th generation

  I have a lot of important things about them that I don't want to lose

  and I can't save them because my computer is broken

  I can't promise anything but through discussions on the forum questions to 9.3.1 vs threads have reported problems for 9.3, there are significantly fewer problems for 3.1 3.

  You can always save things until you do (honestly, it is advisable to always back up your device before installing new software)

  Even with a broken computer you can save things via iCloud, or simply important files to yourself by email or use something like dropbox, of them for download at.

• It will cause problems if my new iMac has the same id and password that my old iMac that I still have and use

  It will cause problems if my new iMac OS 10.11.3 5 k has the same user id and password as my old 2008 imac OS 10.9.5

  No it just means that you can download and sync past purchases and data to iCloud

• When using a 2010 macbook pro and a mini display port to hdmi adapter, will be the macbook pro display be sent to a TV that has hdmi inputs, or do you need a keyboard command

  When using a 2010 macbook pro and a mini display port to hdmi adapter, will be the macbook pro display be sent to a TV that has hdmi inputs, or do you need a keyboard command

  Yes it will be displayed.

• Will my battery burn if I play wile charging?

  Will my battery burn if I play wile charging?

  Of course not.

• Aspire ax1800. It is better to add a wireless card or a usb wireless adapter will be sufficient

  Aspire ax1800 doesn't have a wireless card.  It is better to add a wireless card or a usb wireless adapter will be sufficient?

  Hello

  Here's the original Council/dongles Wireless:

• A2107 Ideapad 12v adapter: will be the OA36247 for the Thinkpad Tablet 1838 work for this unit?

  Hi-

  I have a Thinkpad Slate Tablet (Android OS) and adapter 12v that goes with this unit... will the adapter will work with the other Lenovo tablets like the Ideapad A2107? Thank you for the clarity of rendering.

  The A2107 has a micro usb adapter and a micro usb charger can work. I use my Motorola car adaptor in the car and my usb cable for PC at work to load.

• which will cause 'notify() and wait()' mechanism no longer works?

  Hi all

  My application has worked for a few years, unless the user recently upgraded to OS7.1 and to try out my new device, all of a sudden, he is part works not properly.

  Appplcaition will download data from the server, long story Short,

  When there is no queue of download, application will wait until asked to download real.

  my code something like the follow up:

          InvokeContainer c = new InvokeContainer(r);
          synchronized (c.syncObj) {
              // push to queue
              synchronized (_queue) { _queue.addElement(c); }
              LogManager.getInstance().add("Notify queue Thread _queue size " + _queue.size());
              synchronized (_queueSyncObj) { _queueSyncObj.notifyAll(); }
              // wait for release
             // LogManager.getInstance().add("Invoke data wait to release");
              //synchronized(c.syncObj){
                  try { c.syncObj.wait(); } catch (Exception ex) {}
              //}
              LogManager.getInstance().add("Invoke data released");
          }
  

          while (!_stop) {
              InvokeContainer c = null;
  
              // wait for invoke
              c = getNextInvoke();
              if (c == null) {
                  LogManager.getInstance().add("Wait For next queue");
                  synchronized (_queueSyncObj) {
                      try {
                          _queueSyncObj.wait();
                          LogManager.getInstance().add("Invoked");
                      } catch (Exception ex) {
                          LogManager.getInstance().add("Exception happened: " + ex.toString());
                      }
                  }
                  c = getNextInvoke();
                  LogManager.getInstance().add("Get a new queue ");
              }
  

  My question is:

  my request always stop at the:

   LogManager.getInstance().add("Notify queue Thread _queue size " + _queue.size());
  

  and I saw there's a queue, waiting, however, the line after wait() never called.

  which will cause notify() citing not wait()?

  For me, in places, your code seems too complicated for what he seeks to achieve.  I'll try to simplify.

  First you have loads of protection around your creating a Singleton RuntimeStore object.  This seems pointless.  Take a look at this:

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/Java-development/create-a-singleton-using-the-RuntimeStore/TA...

  Go through your code, I wonder what follows:

  (1) public static synchronized IPCThread getServerInstance() {}

  Why is this it is synchronized?  Iron several people getting to this offers no additional protection.

  (2) synchronized (GlobalSync.getSyncObj (GUID))...

  This synchronized block offers no additional protection either.  Either the

  IPCThread will be there or it won't, there is no possibility of a race condition causes you a problem here.

  (3) public static synchronized IPCThread initServerInstance() {}
  synchronized (GlobalSync.getSyncObj (GUID)) {}

  Here, there might be some value to have only one person to create it at the same time.  But if it's a question, then the second person through should check if it has been created, this code is not.  Thus, each invocation of

  initServerInstance()

  will create and start a new IPCThread.  The synchronized are totally redundant and you have a potential hole in your treatment.

  (4) public synchronized static getInstance() {} IPCThread

  you have another way to get an IPCThread, which in fact is not identical to the above and, will be different if you start another instance of your Application, for example an alternative entry or a variant of starting.

  I recommend that you replace it with the unique getInstance() method based on article.  Do start the IPCThread if it creates.

  OK, I understand that you don't think that this is related to your problem, but with the code you have, there may be several IPCThreads and would not help.

  Now on your invocation code.

  Can you please remove static from the following:

  private static class InvokeContainer...

  As far as I KNOW, he does not buy you anything in this circumstance, and it confuses me.

  The idea here seems to be that you can provide an executable in this process, which it runs and then inform the task (if necessary) awaiting.  You pack the floor area in an InvokeContainer.

  The first thing to look at, it's how you entered extracting from the queue.  Here you protect with this line:

  synchronized (inasmuch)

  So what you're saying to me here, it's that you will protect this treatment in protecting access to the inasmuch.  Something we will add it to the queue. or something is going to take off it the queue, both may not occur at the same time.  That's ok.

  So how do add you to the queue?

  Ignoring the code that will process if the process id is the same, we get this:

  InvokeContainer c = new InvokeContainer (r);
  synchronized (c.syncObj) {}
  Push the queue
  synchronized (inasmuch) {_queue.addElement (c) ;}
  synchronized (_queueSyncObj) {_queueSyncObj.notifyAll () ;}
  wait for the release
  try {c.syncObj.wait () ;} catch (Exception ex) {}}
  }

  Now, we have already seen the queue is protected using "synchronized (inasmuch).  But this code will not prevent the entry we just added picked up before that we treat the notify - in other words, the notification cannot be taken into account.  But that's OK.  The reverse is not.  If the Thread that processes the code IPCThread is at this point:

  If (c == null) {}

  and the Thread that the addition of the transformation executes these two instructions:

  synchronized (inasmuch) {_queue.addElement (c) ;}
  synchronized (_queueSyncObj) {_queueSyncObj.notifyAll () ;}

  then the IPCThread will miss warn him.

  To fix this, I'll do what I suggested earlier.

  The way, this seems very strange:

  InvokeContainer c = new InvokeContainer (r);
  synchronized (c.syncObj) {...}

  but in fact, this means that the code will never fail of the treated IPCThread this practicable, since the notification

  synchronized (c.syncObj) {c.syncObj.notify () ;}

  Cannot run until this thread is waiting.  It's a good thing.

  So that leaves only one thing to discuss - the.invokeAsync.  This code looks good, if the

  synchronized (c.syncObj) {...}

  is completely redundant.

  Summary - 2 recommendations:

  (a) change your Singleton IPCThread to use the RuntimeStore method suggested in the KB article

  (b) check the inside of the protection of

  synchronized (_queueSyncObj) {}

  which

  c = getNextInvoke();

  is always set to null.

  Finally, have you thought about putting a delay time in your expectations, while without worrying about the activity or not, the Thread will pick up every now and again work?  For example:

  _queueSyncObj.wait (1000);

  Edit: Minor typo and readability...

• When you try to move an image to a folder, whatever that means - "this will cause the file on the disk to remove. If you continue, this movement or any changes you made before it can be canceled?

  When you try to move an image to a folder, whatever that means - "this will cause the file on the disk to remove. If you continue, this movement or any changes you made before it can be canceled?

  I saw wording like this before, and I don't think it's anything to worry about. I don't know why Adobe chose these specific words, that your changes are certainly editable after the move.