AAA of VPN3k authentication for accounts of Mgmt

Similar Questions

• Can I have a unique password and ID authentication for accounts and FireFox Sync?

  I can't keep my ID and password held for accounts of Firefox, Firefox Sync and Mozilla. Some how I have used two different e-mail accounts, and they have different passwords.
  I use a MacBook with OS X 10.1.1 and FireFox 34.0

  Sync and Firefox accounts use the same e-mail (user name) and the same password. There is a service - Sync uses Firefox web logins.

  The extent of the "Mozilla", do you mean this forum?
  You can use the same e-mail address and the same password, but different Mozilla Web sites and services use separate record and data connection; none are connected with other sites.

• Test command of the AAA for EAP - TLS authentication for wireless users

  Hi all

  Can anyone suggest me the test command to verify the eap - tls authentication for the Cisco WAP's wireless.

  If it's an authetication jump we can use the command to test the connection below

  Radius of group aaa Testwap-01 #test [email protected] / * / o4 & yJ) NoL$ new-code %0
  Trying to authenticate with the server radius group
  User successfully authenticated

  But eap - tls is not delivered with the password. He insists that for the user name.

  We strive for remote location then test remotely before production.

  If someone help pls in that if we have a command to test or debug command to test this authentication.

  EAP - TLS requires a client certificate. How can you have a simple command that analysis without loading any certificate on the router/switch? It does not exist. This is why eap - tls is not considered an easy to deploy eap method: because it can go wrong on several levels.

  The aaa command test performs a PAP authentication, therefore, it tests the connectivity of the base RADIUS and name of user and password.

  If it works, the only thing that can break for eap - tls are certificates, as well as the radius server will be able to tell if something worng.

• ACS5: method of different external authentication for each user account

  ACS4 I could specify a different external authentication for each user account. I'm trying to find a way to do the same thing to the ACS 5? When I go under identity in Access Services, I see the system requirement: username I can use to identify the user who logs in, so that I can directly to a source of different identity, but the separate political configuration for each user is very inconvinient and would require hundreds of policies, in our case.

  I was hoping that we can create a kind of attribute for each user. SysAdmin > Configuration > dictionaries > identity > internal users. I created the new attribute called 'Storage of identity' with the enumeration type, which has 4 values: internal, Entrust Token, Token RSA, counts AD and checked the box "add a political Condition." I can then go under each user and select the storage of identity for each user. But now I can't find where I can use under part of identity of an access policy. I can use it under "Group mapping" but that maps to one group and not to an identity store. I need to use it under the identity somehow, but I can't find how.

  Hello Roman,

  The attribute you created will be available when the user is authenticated through internel ID store, so that you cannot use to select the store ID.

  The best way to do this would be to use other attributes to differentiate the identity store.
  Allows you to create a sequence of identity store so that for each user, ACS will try to authenticate by using multiple identity store.

  For example, you can use these:

  Network status

  > End Station filter

  > Device filter

  > Devide filter Ports

  Here you can import filters from a file and it would therefore be more scalable.

  Hope this helps.

• Go to AAA to local authentication on 100s of production network devices

  Hello

  I'm looking to migrate 100 s of local AAA authentication devices. I have the code I need to apply, but I can't think of a way how to automate this process.

  If I connect to a switch using the local username, I can then add the config of AAA in the global mode

  AAA TACACS_LOCAL authentication connection group local TACACS_SERVERS

  authorization AAA console

  AAA authorization config-commands

  TACACS_LOCAL AAA authorization exec group local TACACS_SERVERS

  AAA authorization commands 0 TACACS_LOCAL TACACS_SERVERS local group

  AAA authorization commands 1 TACACS_LOCAL TACACS_SERVERS local group

  Group orders 15 AAA authorization TACACS_SERVERS local TACACS_LOCAL

  Start-stop accounting exec TAC TACACS_SERVERS AAA group

  AAA commands 0 arrhythmic TAC accounting TACACS_SERVERS group

  orders accounting AAA 1 group of start-stop TAC TACACS_SERVERS

  AAA commands 15 arrhythmic TAC accounting TACACS_SERVERS group

  However, once I added the config for the line, authorization and then comes into play (as I am logged in as a local user) and rejects any order entered, I then need to re-login using an account of AAA and apply this code;

  line vty 0 4

  authorization controls TACACS_LOCAL 0

  authorization controls 1 TACACS_LOCAL

  authorization controls TACACS_LOCAL 15

  exec authorization TACACS_LOCAL

  accounting orders 0 TAC

  TAC controls 1 accountant

  TAC of 15 accounting commands

  accounting exec TAC

  authentication of the connection TACACS_LOCAL

  I wanted to know if someone came up with a way to apply the code in a single shot? I would ideally like to automate this process using Cisco works, however, I don't see apart from Add this code to the startup config and re-boot anyway...

  Thank you very much

  LON

  LMS generally uses TFTP to deploy the configuration of devices. If the user should not be a problem.

  Go to Configuration-> model-> Import Center

  You can import a configuration of your devices by selcting one. When the configuration is retrieved, you can remove the parts of the configuration, you don't have to and paste the aaa authentication in the window.

  then click Next,

  Here you can preselect the devices you want to deploy. and then click Next.

  If no configuration is displayed, click Next.

  type the required information in the fields. Click on finish

  I recommend to create a template for the removal of the configuration of the aaa, but be aware that when you type just no aaa new-model configuration is 100% removed, soon you type still aaa new-model you have the old configuration was merged with the new. You negotiate all your orders of aaa, followed an aaa new-model step. (This cost me about 2 hours to understand how to remove it).

  Next step is to deploy the config on a test device.

  Go to Configuration-> model Centre-> deploy

  Select your template, and then click Next

  Select your device-> click Next

  If you do not configure any settings click then

  You can add a few additional configurations if you want, click Next

  Plan your deployment, and then click on finish

  Search for problems during the deployment, if everything has worked you can connect the device with your credentials of Ganymede.

  If there are problems with your model, export it and open it with an editor xml of your choice and change the model, import it, and try again.

  I add an example of model

  Good luck

  Alex

• RADIUS authentication for the switch using ISE

  Hi guys,.

  Someone did he do Radius Authentication for switch cli connection using ISE?

  We did it in our environment with ISE, but it is a challenge to give read-only access / Priv-1.

  If some users know the enable password, they can use and earn full privilege.

  Anyway to get around this other than to change the enable password?

  We have thousands of switches and won't change on each of them.

  If you have another method please advice.

  Thank you in advance.

  Well, you can set the "enable" function also be controlled via the AAA server with the following command:

  AAA authentication enable... This way server AAA will be checked for authentication for the secret to activate and use the local database as a last resort

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Authentication for VPN Client AD

  Hello

  I use Cisco 1812 as a server EZVPN. I want to use Active directory for authentication of the VPN users. I'm getting two or three days, but without success.

  With ASA, I am able to authenticate against AD, but not with router IOS. Here is my configuration

  AAA AD krb5 authentication login

  Kerberos local realm THECCIEGROUP. LOCAL

  domain Kerberos THECCIEGROUP thecciegroup.local. LOCAL

  Kerberos realm. thecciegroup.local THECCIEGROUP. LOCAL

  Server Kerberos THECCIEGROUP. 10.10.102.2 PREMISES

  encrypted-kerberos-timestamp preauthentication, Kerberos

  send Kerberos credentials

  If kerberos authentication is not possible, I would like to know the possibility of using AD as external ACS database. I run both AD and ACS on the same server. If I can integrate AD with ca, I can use GANYMEDE or RADIUS for authentication.

  Thank you best regards &,.

  VAMSi Pinnaka

  Bangalore.

  I can answer from the side of the ACS.

  Yes, you can integrate ACS with AD, then the switch uses ACS as a radius server. ACS controls AD by kerberos in the backend transparently.

  If you race 4.x ACS on a Windows PC is a member of the domain, the integration server is automatically made in fact.

• For Cloud SGD LDAP authentication for users and administrators

  Hello.

  I recently completed the installation of my new cloud of SGD 12.1.0.3 on Linux 6.4 (on a virtual machine).

  My question is if it is possible (and how) to enable authentication for new administrator SGD through LDAP accounts?

  We have already our VM hosts configured to allow LDAP authentication to theirs, but how to configure WHO to enable LDAP authentication even as users of server?  Because users are in LDAP, they do not have a local account on the servers, and we do not necessarily want users of WHO in order to connect the servers anyway.

  One of the objectives to use LDAP is that we want to allow users to have only to change their domain/LDAP password and everything else is updated.

  I see that when an account is created in the OMS, the user is created in the repository of OMS database.  I really want to restrict not know them to log directly in the database, but do how this is possible.  Can we still use pupbld for this?  Probably not...

  I read the book below the Oracle documentation, but it is for SGD 11.1 and I'm under 12.1.

  But the same year, he was not very descriptive about how to set up.

  It sounds almost as if you had to take the decision to use LDAP for the installation of beginning of WHO.

  I hope not, and I do not remember that as an option that I have installed the SGD.

  Configuration of Oracle Enterprise repository to use external authentication tools - 11 g Release 1 (11.1.1.7)

  Yes, you can still integrate with LDAP.   Please see the documentation here

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E24628_01/doc.121/e36415/sec_features.htm#CJAGHGAH

  EM use WLS for authentication, so everything that is supported by this version of WLS will work.  Documentation received instructions for OAM/OID/HAD and Active Directory are specified.

  Users can be changed to type external if they are already created in the repository with the appropriate connection name.   Otherwise, new users can be created.

  Also be sure to examine the external roles option, which allows you to map a LDAP group to an external role in EM by using the same name and automatically assigning the privileges required by this group.

• HP20002D19WM came with no software (cyberlink) key and certificates of authenticity for windows

  I just bought the HP20002D19WM, which came with no software (cyberlink) key and certificates of authenticity for windows. I can't use any program cyberlink with a key number to enter. Also if I would give for somereason I wonder in my number of windows I would not be able to since I have ever trevieved it

  This is the original factory specifications for your laptop HP 2000-2d19WM. All Cyberlink OEM software should work without key, because it is not mandatory for the installed OEM mass products. Regarding the Windows product key, see Activation of Windows 8 product;

  • OEM Activation 3.0 (OA3) at the factory. A digital product key (DPK) is encrypted and installed on the motherboard BIOS during the manufacturing process. Windows 8 will be ignited automatically the first time that the computer is connected to the Internet. With systems activated by OA3, most of the computer's hardware can be replaced without the need to reactivate the software from Microsoft.

• Cannot enable authentication for 802. 1 x

  Original title: I can't change the properties on my wireless adapter to get the authentication of 802. 1 x. I get the error message.

  I get an error message when I right click on my wireless connection. I want to access authentication of 802. 1 x. need help, please.

  You see the error of not being able to find a certificate because you select 802.1 x.

  For a home wireless network, you don't want the box "Enable IEEE 802. 1 x authentication for this network"to check.

  What was the problem that you entered in the Properties dialog box of your first wireless adapter?  Normally, see you the list of available wireless networks, select one, click Connect and enter the password when you are prompted.

  I suggest that return you to the "Wireless networks" tab of the properties of the wireless adapter dialog box (it should look like this) and "Delete" all entries in the list of "Favorite networks."  Then go to list "View wireless networks" and connect from there.

  In addition, the foregoing assumes that you use Windows to configure your wireless network card (see the checkmark in the screenshot linked above).  If you use another utility - that came with your computer or your wireless adapter - you should disable that and activate windows (using the checkbox) or read the guide of the user for the utility to determine how to set up your wireless security.

• Authentication for wireless access

  Hello

  The independent implementation of a wireless network is configured as authentication open with an TKIP encryption algorithm. The client key management is set to WPA PSK.

  What exacly is authentication for? I see that the MAC and the EAP are available options. These options to block or to allow real wireless devices that connect to the AP?

  The next thing I see is the authenticated Key management Client and I use WPA PSK. Exactly, what happens once I get this PSK from the client? It is used only to encrypt data?

  Thank you

  Kevin

  Hello

  Here is the link to configure the WLC with LDAP for EAP-FAST...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6366/products_configuration_example09186a008093f1b9.shtml

  About the difference between EAP and PSK, the link I provided in my previous post will help you. different stages through which is involved all its EAP and WPA... Andgoogle search will provide you with several good links as well!

  Let me know if that answers your question and please do not forget to note the useful messages!

  Concerning

  Surendra

• Basic authentication for the OSB exposed as a Rest Service

  Hi all

  We expose OSB Service as a Rest Service to the customer. Need to add basic for the client authentication. In the HTTP transport Service proxy, we have enabled basic authentication. However, we do not know how to proceed. We want to take care of the authentication section in the BSO it itself, so what should be our next step for her? How to extract the authentication information for the request and where to add the check? Is there an easy way to integrate with authentication AD in OSB?

  Hello

  OSB will do authentication for you, no need to make something of yourself. Just move the radiobutton control to basic authentication. It uses the Weblogic domain in the to do. OSB will get the name of user and password of the authentication HTTP header property and validate it against weblogic. If weblogic confirms as a name of user and password valid, OSB running the proxy. Any valid user in weblogic will do, there is no authorization: so no way to limit to a specific user. This means that to connect to AD you must configure using Weblogic. In the field of weblogic, you can add any AD or any LDAP as authenticator.

  With the help of its also possible to validate on a particular user using the UserToken GOSA strategy. You can also use GOSA do BasicAuthentication by applying the specific policy. But GOSA only supports basic over SSL authentication, not simple basic authentication.

  By the way: for BA on a Business Service: you must create a ServiceAccount object with the specific user name password and assign to specific BusinessService. You can create a surveillance society by environment, each in a particular folder of dev/test/ACC/prod. Then use a customization file to switch between them.

  Kind regards
  Martian

• Unable to connect to the MKS: address for server esx02.mgmt.domainname.dk host lookup failed: unknown error 11002 (0x2afa)

  I get the following error when I connect to my via Vsphere Vcenter and try to connect to one of my server with the console:

  Unable to connect to the MKS: address for server esx02.mgmt.domainname.dk host lookup failed: unknown error 11002 (0x2afa)

  I'm new to VMware, I can very well do a MSTSC server and work proberly.

  the VMwareTools are out of date, when I log on the server and try to update I get the following message:

  

  any ideas here?

  I discovered that it is related to DNS

  WSATRY_AGAIN

  11002 (0x2afa)

  It is usually a temporary error during hostname resolution and means that the local server does not valuationauront of response from an authoritative server.

  the issue was that the VMware system was on a different subnet, and the firewall (TMG) blocked. bring the RDP to the Vcenter server and vsphere then open works like a charm

• Authentication for 6.1.1 - IAuthenticationStrategyAdmin

  It seems that any authentication for 6.1.1 + must also implement IAuthenticationStrategyAdmin.  Is this correct?

  Yes, it's true.

• Separate authentication for external and internal users?

  Hello
  
  Asked me to come with a CEP for a client who wants a new system APEX is accessible to internal and external users. The client security team want to have two separate copies of the request for the APEX and both copies of the auditor of the APEX on separate databases on two separate servers from Weblogic to support different security requirements for both internal and external users. I don't think that is necessary as APEX should be able to impose conditions depending on what type of user is connected, by questioning the cookie passed in which could contain a flag to say whether the user is internally and externally. In addition, CAE can be used to further restrict external access.
  
  The middleware for the customer solution is managed by a third party, who have made the following recommendations:
  
  The domestic channel requires SSO to configure on WebLogic while the outside lane. Internal users must be validated on Active Directory, with RSA Authentication Manager used for external users. We cannot set up a listener APEX instance to use and not to use SINGLE sign-on at the same time. Two applications are necessary.
  
  Now, I understand from my understanding limited the listener of the APEX, it is possible to implement different rules depending on the type of user to access. However, might just as well not be managed from Magnatune APEX? We could write a custom authentication procedure that verifies again road and the SSO user authentication cookie or otherwise, as required.
  
  So my question is this: can it really be necessary to implement two versions of an APEX application, with two distinct on different servers APEX headphones, to meet the security requirements of separate here? Ultimately at the end of the day if that's what the customer wants, we have to build it, but I'm looking to reassure them via a CEP that won't be necessary. I think that the seller of hardware/middleware recommend that the client just because they do not know available in APEX itself custom authentication options.
  
  Please forgive any simplifications or the lack of details in the above - I'm more a developer APEX as a person of the infrastructure and a bit of a 'newbie' where the listener APEX is concerned. All advice gratefully appreciated!
  
  Graham.

  Hi Graham,

  It's a matter of people paranoid how and to what extent they trust their own infrastructure. Things could be easier than to split the environments, but I don't know if I just depends on the cookie because cookie can be easily rigged. But I think that the following architecture would be safe:
  1 internal users connect APEX listener somehow security team requires, come to APEX and maybe be identified using the internal IP address (range). To simulate the INVESTIGATION period should be difficult for external users.
  2. external users connect APEX listener through a defined gateway, preferably a proxy. All future requests through this gateway would be considered external users.
  You may add additional logic to the proxy, for example use something like 'mod_headers' in Apache HTTPD to add a page header to requests, so that you may identify as external users.
  You could, of course, also put it the other Tower and allow internal users to use some proxy to enforce certain rules of IP based address, or perhaps a few additional references as authentication for access to the proxy (which again could be transparent user in AD-configuration, at least if you stick with IE).

  You can easily implement the separation in your custom authentication process. But this architecture also allows some other compromise: even if someone does not trust your application logic to handle two types of application successfully, you can also use the proxy to enforce the specific call for an application id. Certainly you don't need to duplicate the infrastructure...
  Most of the companies already have a proxy for external users, for example to activate SSL and to hide other internal resources, for load balancing,... so I think you just need to put some configuration of the existing infrastructure and end up needing no component additional. Even if there is no proxy and yet, it would be an element of very light weight, easy to handle.

  So far, all this has nothing to do with the earpiece of the APEX. It's 'just' a web front-end for the instance of the APEX in the database. I wouldn't put a logic of network security in this service, but the split things upward front. The APEX listener can be patched to add some logic, but which was not supported.

  I think that this would work and should be sufficient for most of the safety requirements.
  If my picture was not painted understandable, let me know.

  -Udo