ACL vs(or along) dotx1 - hierarchy/priority/configurability?

Hello

is it possible to have both dot1x & ACL on the same port?

and who goes first?

an ACL would allow a (begging without dot1) MAC on a port "dot1x port-control on mac?

Best regards

It is best to think of these two characteristics in the independent work of another, completely separate. The ACL will inspect packages and apply the rules to permit/deny regardless of whether the client is authenticated or not.

You can kind of think of it as two bodyguards for a building. Say your ACL is penetration, this would be your first bodyguard. If your bodyguard lists ACL, it allows you to. But there is now a second bodyguard dot1x for the second set of doors. To get the body guard of dot1x, you need the correct password, if you do not have the correct password, you will not get in the building.

Command of the force authorized would be the way to define an interface do not go through the process of authentication and verification. Or have MAB located on the port and have the clients MAC address stored on the RADIUS server.

Tags: Dell Switches

Similar Questions

  • ASA ACL question

    I'm new to the ASA and try to understand something with ACL. It will take I understand about their creation and by adding entries and that all should have the same name, but I'm confused about the ACLs that do not have the same name that already exist on a device or may be named differently.

    For example:

    Access-List Corporate1 permit tcp any any eq www

    Access-List permits Corporate1 tcp everything any https eq

    Access list ip Inside_Out allow a whole

    Access-group Coprorate1 in interface outside

    Ignoring the content at the moment, I have 2 ACL: one with 2 inputs and one with a single entry. The Corporate1 of the ACL applies within the interface and is active. I get this part... My question is: is the Inside_Out of the grouped ACL in automatically with the ACL and activates them as well active or is it safe to say it is not active and can be removed without causing damage? Is the ACL only activates the ACL with the same name as the Access-Group Corporate1?

    I have 2 different people telling me two different things. I'm lost on this one, any help would be greatly appreciated.

    -Jon

    Working with ACLs imply always two steps:

    1. You configure the ACL (with possibly multiple lines but the same name).
    2. You set the ACL to a function. Which might be filtering on an interface with the control-group-access, but is not limited to the one that the ACL is used in several places when the ASA must match the traffic.

    (If you did both) 1 and 2), then the ACL is active and currently in use. If you have set up the ACL only but the ACL was never assigned to a function, then the ACL is not active and can be removed.

    In your example:

    If you find that the ACL 'Inside_Out' but you don't know if the ACL is used, then do one

     sh run | inc Inside_Out

    If the output shows only the ACL lines, it is unused and can be removed.

     clear configure access-list Inside_Out

    Or it is but not used must be used, and then apply the ACL for the desired purpose.

  • Remove the ACL

    Hello

    I participate in an exercise of Packet Tracer.

    I have to remove a 110 ACL extended a router (R1):

    I type: R1 #(config) no access-list 110

    Now the network devices warks as I want, but the output of "R1 #show running-config' always to show me the 110 ACL extended. Why?

    Thank you

    I don't see the ACL in the configuration.

    You use access-list 101 only under int S0/0/0 you want to delete this?

    You can then tap

    conf t

    int s0/0/0

    no out ip-group 101 access

    end

    So in fact, the ACL is gone (or removed from the configuration), but orders referring to the ACL (ie. ip access-group under interface or under SNMP community ACL or ACL under VTY) is still intact. You must remove them manually.

  • SX20 with ACL

    Hi guys,.

    I had an interesting topic for discussion.

    There are cases that SX20s deployed on outside of the firewall, because of the security & fiscal reason.

    And with this topology, with a link between the SX20s that are outside the firewall can be even more dangerous. While their private network is still secure.

    However, suppose they use video call with limited participants (always knew participants), it could be managed with a secure connection.

    So, we can probably use some functions such as the ACL. ACL is actually included in Cisco router or switch, but I couldn't find something like this on the cisco far endpoint. (There is a similar function on VCS (management area), etc.)

    Does anyone have an idea for ACL on SX20? or a similar configuration?

    or should I proceed Feature Enhancement Request? then there should be enough requet?

    Best regards

    Paul

    The right place to make the "ACL" ing would be on the switch/firewall/router between the codec and the internet.  You can't do it on the codec itself.

    Wayne
    --
    Remember the frequency responses and mark your question as answered as appropriate.

  • Split tunneling ACL in easy VPN

    Hello

    When you look at the following example:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a0080087d1e.html#1015440

    I noticed that the split tunneling ACL defined under the "crypto isakmp client configuration group cisco of" are:

    access-list 199 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

    access-list 199 permit ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

    And the local pool assigned to the customer to fred:

    192.168.2.1 192.168.2.10

    Is the above mentioned access list not the access list incorrect because there is no mention of 192.168.2.1 to 192.168.2.10?

    The statement in the license should say the VPNclient that only traffic 192.168.1.0 AND 192.168.3.0 * should * be encrypted and jumped into the tunnel. Not all traffic since?

    If the correct access list would read as follows:

    access-list 199 permit ip any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 199 permit ip any 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    Or am I wrong?

    Hello

    This list (mentioned in the doc) would work fine, but it's better if you use 192.168.2.0 24 in the destination network to be entered specific or specific for all these 10 IPs (.1-->. 10.

    Thank you

    AFAQ

  • NEED HELP for product configuration C4795 all-in-One printer!

    Photosmart all-in-one C4795. Tried unistalling and reinstalling at LEAST 6 times. Guard getting so hung up "product configuration" followed by "Fatal Error During Installation." Running Windows 7 64 bit.  Tried the CD supplied with the printer AND a version I downloaded from HP Tower. off prottection virus during the insltall, which will zip along and hangs on «Configure prouduct.» MADDENING!

    OK, I'll do a L4 uninstall with the HP software.

    1 cleaning disc on your computer - you can skip this step if you want to

  • What is cumulative hierarchy?

    Hi there;

    I want to ask a question. At this link (http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e25554/advmv.htm) there is a sentence as such:

    A hierarchical cube includes data grouped along the hierarchy of rollup of each of its dimensions and these aggregations are combined on the dimensions.


    What is rollup hierarchy? Thanks in advance.

    Hello

    Referring to aggregation functions

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B19306_01/server.102/b14223/Aggreg.htm

    -Pavan Kumar N

  • Error of the ACL

    I get the following error:
    ORA-24247: network access denied by access control list (ACL)

    I read and followed the oracle configuration of ACL doc, but... it does not work

    Take a look at this note:
    ORA-29861 trying to create ACLs for the [560202.1 ID] UTL_HTTP package
    Maybe it's your case...

  • IPSec Nat - T

    Dear friends,

    Cisco 800Series platform

    Version of router #Sh

    Example of output

    Cisco IOS software, software C880 (C880DATA-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2 (4) M4, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2)

    ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4 (22r) YB5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

    5 FastEthernet interfaces
    1 module of virtual private network (VPN)
    256K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
    125496K bytes of ATA CompactFlash (read/write)

    The details mentioned above is some information on my router and ios

    I use DMVPN on GRE Tunnel and it works fine

    We have a new requirement with another partner, they are shared and asking to configure dry IP VPN to interconnect

    Question: -.

    1. What is the different basis between DMVPN and IP Sec VPN?

    2 is that my router for this?

    3. If Yes, how can I disable NAT - T?, request for partner disable

    4. How can I configure statically Nat translation for indoor and outdoor dry IP VPN traffic?

    If I'm dry IP configuration THAT VPN is there any problem will affect my existing DMVPN?

    Please can someone help me?

    > 1. What is the different basis between DMVPN and IP Sec VPN?

    DMVPN is also using IPsec to protect traffic. But DMVPN adds also multipoint GRE and PNDH for additional features.

    > 2. Is that my router for this?

    Well, you use... ;-)

    > 3. If yes how can I disable NAT - T?, request for partner disable

    First ask them why they want to disable. NAT - T is part of the IPsec standard and only adds an additional UDP header if there is a NAT. If there is no NAT between the peers, NAT - T will not change the encapsulation. If the partner needs to be turned off, then they probably use a platform implementation of shit.

    If you still want to disable it:

    no crypto ipsec nat-transparency udp-encapsulation
    > 4. How can I configure statically Nat translation for indoor and outdoor dry IP VPN traffic? NAT is done before the encryption. Just set up your NAT rules to translate your traffic. The translated traffic is then put in correspondence with the crypto-ACL. > If I'm dry IP configuration THAT VPN is there any problem will affect my existing DMVPN? The two can co-exist. But for sure, when you configure something wrong, you can cause problems for your existing configuration.
  • Client VPN Cisco router Cisco, MSW CA + certificates

    Dear Sirs,
    Let me approach you on the following problem.

    I wanted to use a secure between the Cisco VPN client connection
    (Windows XP) and Cisco 2821 with certificate-based authentication.
    I used the Microsoft certification authority (Windows 2003 server).
    Cisco VPN client used eTokenPRO Aladdin as a certificate store.

    Certificate of MSW CA registration and implementation in eToken ran OK
    Customer VPN Cisco doesn't have a problem with the cooperation of eToken.
    Certificate of registration of Cisco2821 MSW ca ran okay too.

    Cisco 2821 configuration is standard. IOS version 12.4 (6).

    Attempt to connect to the client VPN Cisco on Cisco 2821 was
    last update of the error messages:

    ISAKMP: (1020): cannot get router cert or routerdoes do not have a cert: had to find DN!
    ISAKMP: (1020): ITS been RSA signature authentication more XAUTH using id ID_FQDN type
    ISAKMP (1020): payload ID
    next payload: 6
    type: 2
    FULL domain name: cisco - ca.firm.com
    Protocol: 17
    Port: 500
    Length: 25
    ISAKMP: (1020): the total payload length: 25
    ISAKMP (1020): no cert string to send to peers
    ISAKMP (1020): peer not specified not issuing and none found appropriate profile
    ISAKMP (1020): Action of WSF returned the error: 2
    ISAKMP: (1020): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
    ISAKMP: (1020): former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

    Is there some refence where is possible to find some information on
    This problem? There is someone who knows how to understand these mistakes?
    Thank you very much for your help.

    Best regards
    P.Sonenberk

    PS Some useful information for people who are interested in the above problem.

    Address IP of Cisco 2821 10.1.1.220, client VPN IP address is 10.1.1.133.
    MSW's IP 10.1.1.50.
    Important parts of the Cisco 2821 configuration:

    !
    cisco-ca hostname
    !
    ................
    AAA new-model
    !
    AAA authentication login default local
    AAA authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
    AAA authorization exec default local
    AAA authorization sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
    !
    ...............
    IP domain name firm.com
    host IP company-cu 10.1.1.50
    host to IP cisco-vpn1 10.1.1.133
    name of the IP-server 10.1.1.33
    !
    Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
    !
    Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4097309259
    enrollment selfsigned
    name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 4097309259
    revocation checking no
    rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4097309259
    !
    Crypto pki trustpoint company-cu
    registration mode ra
    Enrollment url http://10.1.1.50:80/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
    use of ike
    Serial number no
    IP address no
    password 7 005C31272503535729701A1B5E40523647
    revocation checking no
    !
    TP-self-signed-4097309259 crypto pki certificate chain
    certificate self-signed 01
    30820249 308201B 2 A0030201 02020101 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030
    .............
    FEDDCCEA 8FD14836 24CDD736 34
    quit smoking
    company-cu pki encryption certificate chain
    certificate 1150A66F000100000013
    30820509 308203F1 A0030201 02020 HAS 11 092A 8648 01000000 13300 06 50A66F00
    ...............
    9E417C44 2062BFD5 F4FB9C0B AA
    quit smoking
    certificate ca 51BAC7C822D1F6A3469D1ADC32D0EB8C
    30820489 30820371 A0030201 BAC7C822 02021051 D1F6A346 9D1ADC32 D0EB8C30
    ...............
    C379F382 36E0A54E 0A6278A7 46
    quit smoking
    !
    ...................
    crypto ISAKMP policy 30
    BA 3des
    md5 hash
    authentication rsa-BA
    Group 2
    ISAKMP crypto identity hostname
    !
    Configuration group customer isakmp crypto Group159
    key Key159Key
    pool SDM_POOL_1
    ACL 100
    !
    the crypto isakmp client configuration group them
    domain firm.com
    pool SDM_POOL_1
    ACL 100
    !
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3DES-MD5
    !
    crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
    the transform-set 3DES-MD5 value
    market arriere-route
    !
    card crypto SDM_CMAP_1 client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
    map SDM_CMAP_1 isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 crypto
    client configuration address map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto answer
    map SDM_CMAP_1 65535-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1 ipsec crypto
    !
    ................
    !
    end

    status company-cu of Cisco-ca #show cryptographic pki trustpoints
    Trustpoint company-cu:
    Issuing CA certificate configured:
    Name of the object:
    CN = firm-cu, dc = company, dc = local
    Fingerprint MD5: 5026582F 8CF455F8 56151047 2FFAC0D6
    Fingerprint SHA1: 47B 74974 7C85EA48 760516DE AAC84C5D 4427E829
    Universal router configured certificate:
    Name of the object:
    host name = cisco - ca.firm.com
    Fingerprint MD5: E78702ED 47D5D36F B732CC4C BA97A4ED
    Fingerprint SHA1: 78DEAE7E ACC12F15 1DFB4EB8 7FC DC6F3B7E 00138
    State:
    Generated keys... Yes (general purpose, not exportable)
    Authenticated issuing certification authority... Yes
    Request certificate (s)... Yes

    Cisco-ca #sh crypto pubkey-door-key rsa
    Code: M - configured manually, C - excerpt from certificate

    Name of code use IP-address/VRF Keyring
    C Signature name of X.500 DN default:
    CN = firm-cu
    DC = company
    DC = local

    C signature by default cisco-vpn1

    IMPORTANT: I don't have a Cisco IOS Software: 12.4 (5), 12.3 (11) T08, 12.4 (4.7) PI03c,.
    12.4 (4.7) T - there is error in the cryptographic module.

    Hey guys, it's weird that the router is not find cert after IKE is the cert and validates, it is certainly not reason, but I would go ahead and set up the mapping of certificate on this router to force the client to associate with Group of IKE, for that matter, that you need to change your config a bit for use iskamp profiles :

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_isakp.html

  • VPN ipsec Cisco 877 <>- iphone

    Hi, I'm trying implement the vpn ipsec between my cisco 877 and his iphone/cisco vpn client. First of all, what is the difference between remote access vpn and vpn installation easy? The phase 1 and the phase2 are completed but I don't have much traffic between peers.

    Maybe I missed something conf? Should I add the roadmap with acl 101?

    Here is the configuration of isakmp/ipsec.

    ISAKMP crypto enable
    session of crypto consignment

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10
    BA 3des
    md5 hash
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    life 3600
    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10
    ISAKMP crypto nat keepalive 20
    ISAKMP xauth timeout 90 crypto

    ISAKMP crypto client configuration group to distance-vpn
    key to past
    DNS 212.216.112.112
    cisco877.local field
    10 Max-users
    Max-connections 10
    pool remotely
    ACL 150
    Save-password

    Crypto ipsec transform-set VPN-CLI-SET esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec security association idle time 3600

    distance from dyn-crypto-dynamic-map 10
    transformation-VPN-CLI-SET game

    card crypto remotemap local-address dialer0
    card crypto client remotemap of authentication list userauthen
    card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor remotemap
    client configuration address card crypto remotemap answer
    remotemap 65535 ipsec-isakmp crypto map distance Dynamics-dyn

    interface dialer0
    remotemap card crypto

    IP local pool remote control-pool 192.168.69.0 192.168.69.20

    IP route 192.168.69.0 255.255.255.0 dialer0

    no access list 150
    REM list 150 * ACL split tunnel access *.
    access-list 150 permit ip 10.0.77.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.69.0 0.0.0.255

    no access list 101
    Note access-list 101 * ACL sheep *.
    access-list 101 deny ip 10.0.77.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.69.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.77.0 0.0.0.255 any

    Should I apply this acl 101 loopback?  Ex:

    overload of IP nat inside source list 101 interface Loopback0

    Should I apply an acl to permit as access-list 169 allow ip 192.168.69.0 0.0.0.255 any in my Dialer interface 0?

    Other tips? Best regards.

    Hi Alessandro,.

    The access tunnel split list is great!

    If you are NAT on public and private interface that is ip nat inside and ip nat outside etc.

    You must add the command ip nat inside source list 101 interface Dialer0 overload

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Or you can create a new roadmap

    new route map permit 10

    ACL #match 101

    command: ip nat inside the interface Dialer0 overload route map

    Thank you

    Adama

  • Establishment of AP for independent

    I'm on a test with only an access point and a client network. I have no servers on this network radius. I am able to get my statically IP'd client to be accepted by the ap through its encryption but I keep getting errors that said it could not authenticate (% DOT11-7-AUTH_FAILED). I know that it is because it's just the ap and the client on my test network. Is it possible to set up an access point to not try to authenticate to a radius server? I tried seting local authentication without result. Keeping in mind I work with JUST the ap and the client on that particular network.

    Hey there,

    IOS APs on the local radius server will support only jump, if you the customer supports LEAP then I would for the authentication of the client. Otherwise if the AP receives an authentication request 802. 1 x it will pass along any external authentication configured. No way to stop the AP from the front the request client authentication if the SSID of the APs is configured to accept eap network authentication requests. I hope this helps.

    Kind regards

    Aaron

  • site-to-site between 5505 s ASA: a subnet cannot send traffic through VPN

    Hello again! In case you saw my last post, I managed to solve the problem of isakmp with my tunnel from site to site a couple of weeks.

    Everything works fine now, except for one strange thing. First of all, a topology:

    Our main campus is 1 (192.168.32.0/20) of the plant, plant 2 (192.168.16.0/20) and MOS (192.168.0.0/20). The ASA "KSIASA01" is on the main campus.

    On the other side of the tunnel, on a SDSL circuit ~ 400 Kbps, is plant 3 (192.168.48.0/20) and the ASA "KSIASA03."

    Now I can ping addresses in factory 3 very well to our main campus, if I leave the subnets 192.168.11.0/24, 192.168.25.0/24, 192.168.18.0/24 and 192.168.42.0/24. However, several other subnets fails when I ping from the main campus. The. I'm more concerned is 192.168.38.0/24.

    Here's the twist: if I ping from plant 3, I can ping everything in the main campus very well. Also, after I ping the subnet 192.168.38.0/24 of plant 3, I can then ping back from 192.168.38.0/24 to plant 3 without problems. But after an hour or two, we can no more.

    On KSIASA01, if I turn the Packet Tracer, failed pings reach "VPN Lookup" and then fail with "(acl-drop) Flow is refused by the configured rule." "

    My research tells me so far that it can be a NAT problem, but I can't understand it. I will attach sanitized configs for the two ASAs. Thanks in advance for your help and advice.

    Hello, Jefferson.

    NAT seems perfect (at first glance).

    The only problem I've found there's inconsistency in encryption ACL:

    the Plant1-Plant2-MOS object-group network

    network-object MOS 255.255.240.0

    network-object Plant2 255.255.240.0

    network-object Plant1 255.255.240.0

    outside_2_cryptomap list extended access allowed object-group Plant1-Plant2-MOS Plant3 255.255.240.0 ip

    vs.

    the Plant1Plant2MOS object-group network

    network-object MOS 255.255.240.0

    network-object Plant2 255.255.240.0

    object-network Subnet38 255.255.255.0

    object-network Subnet42 255.255.255.0

    access extensive list ip Plant3 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.240.0 object-group Plant1Plant2MOS

  • VPN IPSec does not work

    I am trying to set up a VPN between a 2901 router and 831, but I'm not having any success.  When I run crypto isakmp sa, I get this:

    cisco831 #sh crypto isakmp his
    IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
    status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
    IPv6 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

    It doesn't seem to be a sign of life.  I can access internet ok on both routers, but the failure of attempts to ping between the routers LAN IP.  I guess it's a problem of nat or access-list, but I don't know what I'm missing at this time.  Here are my configs:

    CISCO 2901
    version 15.0
    tcp KeepAlive-component snap-in service
    a tcp-KeepAlive-quick service
    horodateurs service debug datetime localtime
    Log service timestamps uptime
    encryption password service
    !
    host name 2901
    !
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    !
    no logging rate limit
    no console logging
    Select the secret XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

    !
    No aaa new-model
    !
    No ipv6 cef
    no ip source route
    IP cef
    !
    IP domain name mondomaine.fr
    inspect CBAC tcp IP name
    inspect the name CBAC icmp IP
    inspect the name CBAC udp IP
    !
    Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

    secret user name me XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5!
    redundancy
    !
    crypto ISAKMP policy 3
    BA 3des
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    ISAKMP crypto key address 173.x.x.x mypassword
    !
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac TRANSFORMSET
    !
    MYVPN 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
    the value of 173.x.x.13 peer
    game of transformation-TRANSFORMSET
    PFS group2 Set
    match address 199
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/0
    Description of the Internet
    IP address 173.x.x.x 255.255.255.248
    NAT outside IP
    IP inspect CBAC out
    IP virtual-reassembly
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    card crypto MYVPN
    !
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    Description of LAN
    no ip address
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    !
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1.1
    encapsulation dot1Q 2
    IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
    IP access-group 100 to
    penetration of the IP stream
    stream IP output
    IP nat inside
    IP virtual-reassembly
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1.2
    encapsulation dot1Q 3
    IP 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
    IP access-group 101 in
    penetration of the IP stream
    IP nat inside
    IP virtual-reassembly
    !
    no ip forward-Protocol nd
    !
    IP http server
    IP http secure server
    IP flow-export GigabitEthernet0/1.1 source
    IP flow-export version 5
    flow IP 192.168.1.5 export destination 9996
    !
    overload of IP nat inside source list NAT interface GigabitEthernet0/0
    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.x.x.x
    !
    NAT extended IP access list
    ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
    !
    threshold of journal-update of 2147483647 IP access list
    recording of debug trap
    logging 192.168.1.5
    access-list 199 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.20.0.0 0.0.0.255
    !
    control plan
    !
    Line con 0
    line to 0
    line vty 0 4
    exec-timeout 480 0
    password 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

    local connection
    entry ssh transport
    !
    Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
    end
    ************************************************************************
    CISCO 831
    Version 12.4
    no service button
    horodateurs service debug datetime msec
    Log service timestamps datetime msec
    encryption password service
    !
    hostname cisco831
    !
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    !
    activate secret XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!
    AAA new-model
    !
    !
    AAA authentication login me local
    !
    !
    AAA - the id of the joint session
    !
    !
    !
    !
    No dhcp use connected vrf ip
    DHCP excluded-address IP 172.20.0.1
    !
    IP dhcp pool mypool
    network 172.20.0.0 255.255.255.0
    WR domain name
    Server DNS 8.8.8.8
    router by default - 172.20.0.1
    !
    IP cef
    no ip domain search
    IP domain name mondomaine.fr
    !
    Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
    secret user name me 5 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

    !
    crypto ISAKMP policy 3
    BA 3des
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    ISAKMP crypto key address 173.x.x.x mypassword
    !
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac TRANSFORMSET
    !
    MYVPN 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
    the value of 173.x.x.x peer
    game of transformation-TRANSFORMSET
    PFS group2 Set
    match address 199
    !
    Archives
    The config log
    hidekeys
    !
    interface Ethernet0
    LAN description
    IP 172.20.0.1 address 255.255.255.0
    IP access-group 100 to
    IP nat inside
    IP virtual-reassembly
    !
    interface Ethernet1
    Description of the internet
    IP address 173.x.x.13 255.255.255.248
    NAT outside IP
    IP virtual-reassembly
    automatic duplex
    card crypto MYVPN
    !
    interface Ethernet2
    no ip address
    Shutdown
    !
    IP forward-Protocol ND
    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.x.x.14
    !
    no ip address of the http server
    no ip http secure server
    !
    overload of IP nat inside source list 100 interface Ethernet1

    Crypto-list extended IP access list
    ip licensing 172.20.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 100 permit ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
    access-list 199 permit ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
    !
    control plan
    !
    Line con 0
    password 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

    no activation of the modem
    line to 0
    line vty 0 4
    privilege level 15
    transport input telnet ssh
    !
    max-task-time 5000 Planner
    end

    A few things that need to be changed:

    CISCO 2901:

    (1) ACL 100 applies to GigabitEthernet0/1.1, however, I do not see 100 ACL configured on the configuration.

    (2) ACL 101 is applied to GigabitEthernet0/1.2, however, I do not see that ACL 101 exists in the configuration.

    (3) NAT ACL must exempt traffic between 2 local networks as follows:

    NAT extended IP access list
    1 refuse ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.20.0.0 0.0.0.255

    CISCO 831:

    (1) ACL 100 is currently applied to the configuration section 2: NAT and Ethernet0. I would create a new ACL for instruction of NAT that should be added to the deny ACL (NAT exemption) as follows:

    access-list 150 deny ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 150 permit ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

    overload of IP nat inside source list 150 interface Ethernet1

    no nat ip inside the source list 100 interface Ethernet1 overload

    Hope that helps.

  • The addition of sheep statement disconnects from the Internet

    Hello

    I found very strange question about the tunnel VPN IPSec L2L.

    ASA 5510 I have a Site in Tunnels created for many clients and they all work correctly.

    Now I create for new client VPN tunnel and as soon as I add statement sheep, I see that I have no connection with ASA 5510 and Internet disconnects for everyone.

    I have to wait 30 seconds then Internet comes up and everything works fine but I see sheep stement is not added.

    sh run nat

    NAT (INSIDE-VL10) 0-list of access INSIDE_NAT0

    NAT (INSIDE-VL10) 1 10.7.10.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (INSIDE-VL15) 0-list of access INSIDE_NAT0

    NAT (INSIDE-VL15) 1 10.7.15.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (INSIDE-VL5) 0-list of access INSIDE_NAT0

    NAT (INSIDE-VL5) 1 10.7.5.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (INSIDE VL25) 0-list of access INSIDE_NAT0

    NAT (INSIDE VL25) 1 10.7.25.0 255.255.255.0

    SH run access-list INSIDE_NAT0

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip object-group ABC_LAN-group of objects CLIENT1_LAN

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip object-group ABC_LAN-group of objects CLIENT11_LAN

    INSIDE_NAT0 list of allowed ip extended access object-ABC_LAN-SF ABC_LAN-NET group object

    INSIDE_NAT0 list of allowed ip extended access object-ABC_LAN-NET object group ABC_LAN-SF

    INSIDE_NAT0 lists of permitted ip extended access object-ABC_LAN-ML item ABC_LAN-NET group

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip group ABC_LAN-ML object object-ABC_LAN-NET

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip object-group ABC_LAN-group of objects CLIENT2_LAN

    INSIDE_NAT0 list of allowed ip extended access object-ABC_LAN-NET ABC_LAN_RVPN-ADMIN group object

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip object-group ABC_LAN-group of objects CLIENT3_LAN

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip group CLIENT4_LAN object object-ABC_LAN-SS

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip group CLIENT5_LAN object object-ABC_LAN-SS

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip object-group ABC_LAN-group of objects CLIENT6_LAN

    # #New Config

    the NEWCLIENT_LAN object-group network

    network-object 10.34.123.184 255.255.255.252

    network-object 10.34.185.224 255.255.255.248

    network-object 10.45.103.192 255.255.255.192

    INSIDE_NAT0 list extended access permitted ip object-group ABC_LAN-SS NEWCLIENT_LAN object-group

    access-list VPN_ABC-NEWCLIENT allowed extended ip object-group ABC_LAN-SS NEWCLIENT_LAN object-group

    VPN-FILTER_NEWCLIENT-ABC extended access list permit ip object-group objects ABC_LAN-SS NEWCLIENT_LAN-group

    correspondence address 25 card outside_map0 VPN_ABC-NEWCLIENT crypto

    card crypto outside_map0 25 set pfs

    outside_map0 25 crypto map set peer 6.6.6.6

    card crypto outside_map0 25 game of transformation-ESP-AES-256-SHA

    life card crypto outside_map0 25 set security-association seconds 28800

    Group VPNGP_ABC-NEWCLIENT policy internal

    Group VPNGP_ABC-NEWCLIENT policy attributes

    value of filter-VPN VPN-FILTER_NEWCLIENT-ABC

    tunnel-group 6.6.6.6 type ipsec-l2l

    tunnel-group 6.6.6.6 General attributes

    Group Policy - by default-VPNGP_ABC-NEWCLIENT

    tunnel-group 6.6.6.6 ipsec-attributes

    pre-shared-key fdfsf

    ISAKMP retry threshold 30 keepalive 5

    Route outside 10.34.123.184 255.255.255.252 183.82.0.1 1

    Route outside 10.34.185.224 255.255.255.248 183.82.0.1 1

    Route outside 10.45.103.192 255.255.255.192 183.82.0.1 1

    Hello

    So you're saying that you add the command which in turn on 30s causes break for all network connections and connection management to the ASA himself. And after you retrieve the management connection, you see that the ASA has not added the NAT0/configuration of the ASA statement?

    If this is true then I have not run into this before.

    Although the first thing that strikes me is that you share a unique ACL for all interfaces of the NAT0 configurations.

    I suggest creating separate ACL for each interface on the ASA and use that separate ACL on each interface "(nameif) nat 0 access-list" configuration ".

    -Jouni

Maybe you are looking for