ACS 5.1 - Exception permission policy assessment

Similar Questions

• Error of org.xml ACS 5.3 Exception when executing reports

  Hello

  5.3 GBA running on a device of 1121

  When you run a report's RADIUS authentication, accounting, etc. is all report, I get the error attached image (org.xml.sax.SAXParseException...). I have not yet found a solution. I'm running another ACS 5.2 device that does not have this error

  If the upgrade to a newer version will solve this problem, the license (5.3) will suffice.

  Any help is appreciated

  Kind regards

  MOE Shea

  Hello Mo,

  I have this error either a browser problem, I recommend you watch the ACS 5.3 release notes and confirm if you are currently using a supported browser:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_contro...

  A restart of services can take care of it as well in case you are using a supported browser.

  Note: Please mark as answer as appropriate

• ACS 5.1 - AD authentication LDAP VS

  Any help on this would be great

  I can manage to get my account record in the thinking of Active Directory configuring cisco switch in the external identity stores but not my setup LDAP here are a few successful newspapers, log in and unsuccessful newspaper with ldap.

  AD-SETUP

  Selected identity store - AD1

  Current identity store does not support the authentication method; He jumps.

  GANYMEDE + will use the global configuration GANYMEDE password +.

  Returned GANYMEDE + authentication response

  Received authentication GANYMEDE + CONTINUE application

  Using the previously selected Access Service

  Political identity was assessed before; Sequence identity continues

  Authentication of user in Active Directory

  Recovery of the Active Directory user groups succeeded

  Active Directory user authentication succeeded

  After authentication

  Access policy
  Access service:	Default device Admin
  Identity store:	CDs
  Shell selected profile:	Privilege mode
  Active Directory domain:	Blah.com/results.htm
  Group membership:
  Access matched Service selection rule:	Rule-2
  Comparative political identity rule:	By default
  Some identity stores:	CDs
  Application identity stores:
  The selected application identity stores:
  Mapping of matching rule group strategy:
  Matching rule permission policy:	Rule-1

  The only problem with this configuration is that I can only add the domain blah.com/results.htm example and I get massive latency since the authentication process will over State to other domain instead of the local controllers.

  I can tell by the STATUS of the AAA in track because of dashboard that latency is about 8000ms and the slow, log on to the switch.

  LDAP-SETUP

  In my LDAP configuration I have a primary host name and secondary closer to home to avoid latency I do a test of bind that returns successfully on both hosts. Configure my Orgainzation tab directory and do a test configuration to get a return of the Group > 100 > 100 topic.

  I have reset my indenities to instead of AD LDAP stores and try again, but for some reason that I get 22056 object not found error! I can't just that work on here are the details

  Corresponding rule

  Selected Access Service - Admin default device

  Evaluate the politics of identity

  By default matching rule

  Selected - identity store

  Current identity store does not support the authentication method; He jumps.

  GANYMEDE + will use the global configuration GANYMEDE password +.

  Returned GANYMEDE + authentication response

  Received authentication GANYMEDE + CONTINUE application

  Using the previously selected Access Service

  Political identity was assessed before; Sequence identity continues

  Send the request to the primary LDAP server

  User authentication against the LDAP server

  The user's search ended with an error

  Main server failover. Switching to the secondary server

  Send the request to the secondary LDAP server

  User authentication against the LDAP server

  User not found in the LDAP server

  Object was not found in the identity of the point of sale.

  The advanced option is configured for a unknown user is used.

  The option 'Refuse' Advanced is set in the case of a request for authentication has failed.

  Returned GANYMEDE + authentication response

  Are there ideas, I can try so that it can find my account as the structure of the AD did? ideas please?

  see you soon

  HI Ed,

  Try using a standard LDAP browser (www.ldapbrowser.com ) to view LDAP structure.  Verify base DN used for searches matches
  
  structure.
  
  Regards,
  
  ~JG
  Do rate helpful posts
  
  

• Cisco Secure ACS groups 5.1 Active Directory and RSA Authentication Manager 7.1 for profiles

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style - qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 cm 0 cm 5.4pt 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0 cm; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font-size: 11.0pt; font family: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-make: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-make: minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-make: minor-latin ;}"}

  Hello

  I'm deploying an ACS connected to an RSA AuthManager (that is connected to an Active Directory domain)

  I create several groups within the Active Directory server, I try to give to users for their groups different access rights.

  I tried to define an access policy "NetOp/NetAdm" and two authorization rules:

  Rule-1 AD - AD1:ExternalGroups contains all dir. INTRA/groups/NETOP 'Auth for net operators' 0

  Rule 2 AD - AD1:ExternalGroups contains all dir. INTRA/groups/NETADM 'Auth net admin' 0

  Default: refuse

  In the identity, I have configured the RSA identity source, so that users get authenticated by the RSA Authentication Manager.

  But I still refuse to get access, RSA authentication is successful, but the group membership, active directory does not work, even with the unix attributes or group principal defined for the user.

  My question is this valid configuration scenario? Is there another way to define several profiles according to the Group of users of external source?

  The stages of monitoring:

  Measures

  Request for access received RADIUS 11001

  11017 RADIUS creates a new session

  Assess Service selection strategy

  15004 Matched rule

  Access to Selected 15012 - NetOp/NetAdm service policy

  Evaluate the politics of identity

  15004 Matched rule

  15013 selected identity Store - server RSA

  24500 Authenticating user on the server's RSA SecurID.

  24501 a session is established with the server's RSA SecurID.

  24506 check successful operation code

  24505 user authentication succeeded.

  24553 user record has been cached

  24502 with RSA SecurID Server session is closed

  Authentication 22037 spent

  22023 proceed to the recovery of the attribute

  24628 user cache not enabled in the configuration of the RADIUS identity token store.

  Identity sequence 22016 completed an iteration of the IDStores

  Evaluate the strategy of group mapping

  15006 set default mapping rule

  Authorization of emergency policy assessment

  15042 no rule has been balanced

  Evaluation of authorization policy

  15006 set default mapping rule

  15016 selected the authorization - DenyAccess profile

  15039 selected authorization profile is DenyAccess

  11003 returned RADIUS Access-Reject

  Thank you

  Christophe

  I think you need to do is to create a sequence of identity with RSA as a selection in

  Authentication and recovery research list of attributes and AD in the additional attribute list recovery research. Then select this sequence as a result of the politics of identity for the service

• IPSec vpn cisco asa and acs 5.1

  We have configured authentication ipsec vpn cisco asa acs 5.1:

  Here is the config in cisco vpn 5580:

  standard access list acltest allow 10.10.30.0 255.255.255.0

  RADIUS protocol AAA-server Gserver

  AAA-server host 10.1.8.10 Gserver (inside)

  Cisco key

  AAA-server host 10.1.8.11 Gserver (inside)

  Cisco key

  internal group gpTest strategy

  gpTest group policy attributes

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list acltest

  type tunnel-group test remote access

  tunnel-group test general attributes

  address localpool pool

  Group Policy - by default-gpTest

  authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

  authorization-server-group Gserver

  accounting-server-group Gserver

  IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group test

  pre-shared-key cisco123

  GBA, we config user group: VPN users. all VPN users in this group. ACS can visit his political profile: If the user in the 'VPN users' group, access ACS.

  When we connect from a VPN Client to the server, all users connect to success. When you see the parser in ACS journal, each user success connect also get

  error:

  22040 wrong password or invalid shared secret

  (pls see picture to attach it)

  the system still works, but I don't know why, we get the error log.

  Thanks for any help you can provide!

  Duyen

  Hello Duyen,

  I think I've narrowed the issue. When remote access VPN using RADIUS authentication we must keep in mind that authentication and authorization are included on the same package.

  Depending on your configuration, the ACS is defined as a server RADIUS (Gserver Protocol radius aaa server) and becomes the VPN Tunnel authenticated and 'authorized' on this server group:

  authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

  authorization-server-group Gserver

  As noted above, the RADIUS of request/response includes authentication and authorization on the same package. This seems to be a problem of incorrect configuration that we should not set up the 'permission' in the Tunnel of the group.

  Please remove the authorization under the Tunnel of Group:

  No authorization-server-group Gserver

  Please test the connection again and check the logs of the ACS. At this point there are only sucessful newspaper reported on the side of the ACS.

  Is 'Permission-server-group' LDAP permission when authenticating to a LDAP server so to retrieve the attributes of permission on the server. RAY doesn't have the command as explained above.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards.

• Configuration of the Cisco ACS 5.3 AnyConnect VPN and management of a Cisco ASA 5500.

  We have configured a Cisco ASA 5505 as a VPN endpoint for one of our user groups.  It works, but it works too well.

  We have a group called XXX we need to have access to the Cisco AnyConnect Client.  We have selected this group of our Active Directory and added to our ACS configuration.  We've also added a group called YYY that will manage the ASA. However, this group has no need to access the VPN.

  We added XXX movies for the elements of the policy of access to the network-> authorization profiles.  We also have a profile of YYY.

  She continues to knock on our default Service rule that says allow all.

  We have also created a default network access rule. for this.

  I am at a loss.  I'm sure I missed a checkbox or something.

  Any help would be really appreciated.

  Dwane

  We use Protocol Management GANYMEDE ASA and Ray for VPN access?

  For administration, you must change the device by default admin access strategy and create a permission policy. Even by the way, you can change the network access by default for vpn access and create a respective policy for that too.

  On the SAA, you must configure Ganymede and Ray both as a server group.

  For the administration, you can set Ganymede as an external authentication under orders aaa Server

  AAA-server protocol Ganymede GANYMEDE +.

  Console HTTP authentication AAA GANYMEDE

  Console Telnet AAA authentication RADIUS LOCAL

  authentication AAA ssh console LOCAL GANYMEDE

  Console to enable AAA authentication RADIUS LOCAL

  For VPN, you must set the authentication radius under the tunnel-group.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Jousset

  The rate of useful messages-

• Anyone know of a doc covering using ACS 5.3 to control the VLAN using GANYMEDE?

  Hello

  If someone could help with this, I'd appreciate it.

  I configured a system ACS 5.3 and all my groups etc fucniton corrcetly both for network access and for the Administration of the unit.

  However I am stuck trying to allow clients to authenticate on the page web of the router or the Web authentication, using GANYMEDE + between the router and the ACS5.3.

  I watched this and I need to configure a custom attribute of 'service' with the type bound and in relation to a permission policy.

  I think that the custom configuration attributes is where I'm stuck.

  Once agin thanks for any help

  Brian

  Your best bet is to use the RADIUS, ACS supports RADIUS and most of the time you try to users access to the network of your admins of device segment, and the best way to do that is using RADIUS versus Ganymede.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• 5.2 ACS with authorization SRX GANYMEDE +.

  I'm trying to get the job GANYMEDE + on SRX 11.4R7.5. However, during my packet captures on SRX. I found the authorzation SRX with service request = junos-exec but ACS returns no value. causing the SRX to use the 'remote control' as a local user name and take the parameter class to it.

  "ACS, I found"Group mapping"policy correspondence to the"default rule"and leave" policy corresponded to the "default rule" as well.

  Please help to provide me with a link to the document on how to configure Group mapping and the authorization policy.

  You have to push the attributes in the policy elements > custom attributes even as fact here:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3417297#3417297

  After that go to the access policies > default device admin > customize > it will open a page customize, in which you choose the types of use of the condition in the policy.

  something like AD1: External group and Nas ip address and used to match the authorization rule.

  External group: in case you want to check if user on AD should belong to this group.

  NAS ip address: go where the Ganymede request here

  Jatin kone
  -Does the rate of useful messages-

• CSD before logon with VPN policy without client check

  I'm testing the CSD before political logon controls while I use the VPN without client. I found that if java is not detected then I will this information, "Weblaunch for Cisco Secure Desktop has failed. If you want to manually start the Cisco Secure Desktop, you can download a native Cisco Secure Desktop Launcher. »

  But underneath, I also see "or log in using the link below (some resources may not be available):
  Login»

  This means that I can bypass the verification before opening of political of CSD session if JAVA is not installed.

  Is this good? or I do not miss anything?

  You can use Dynamic Access policies (RAP) to perform additional checks. These controls to use CSD and if CDD is not running (or bypass) the DfltAccessPolicy is applied. You can set it to terminate the connection and display a message to the user. Before the DfltAccessPolicy you must have a permissive policy where check you something that is always true (e.g. the all kinds of operating systems) and the value of the action to continue.

  If you do not have only clientless connections additional tuning may be necessary.

  Update:

  A good docs on the verification of existence of CSD:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-8283

• OIM 11 g - authorization of the user management policy questions

  Hello
  
  (1) created a body-> human resources
  (2) created a role-> HR_Admins
  (3) assigned HR_Admins roles as the administrative role of human resources
  (4) user1 created with the Organization as a role of human resources & HR_Admins assigned to this user.
  (5) permission policy created for the management of users with the following selections
  -> Create user authorization.
  Constraints of data-> Selected "Users who are members of certain organizations" & selected above human resources organization.
  Transfer-> role of the HR_Admins.
  now, when I log in User1 I am not able to see Administration tab where I can choose create user.
  I'm working on this issue for a few days, but not able to find the solution & I missed some configurations?
  
  Thank you
  Rahul Shah

  Hello Rahul,
  I tried your scénarion... with clause below
  1) founded an organization-> human resources
  (2) created a role-> HR_Admins
  (3) assigned HR_Admins roles as the administrative role of human resources
  (4) user1 created with the Organization as a role of Human Resource & allocated HR_Admins to this user. : default role all users
  (5) permission policy created for the management of users with the following selections
  -> Create user authorization. :-* "Select ALL."
  Constraints data-> Selected "Users who are members of certain organizations" & selected above human resources organization.
  -> HR_Admins role assignment.

  Data constraints
  Organization security setting hierarchy aware (include all children's organizations)

  Now I am able to see the user tab to create, and I can create user in resources human org only.

  If it does not work for you. Just assign 'ADMINISTRATOR of REQUEST' in the AUTH POLICIES. The result of the test.

  Also, what is your version of the IOM?

  Test with updated as new role name, org, and user data.
  -kuldeep

  Published by: Kuldeep on May 22, 2012 04:19

• OIM 11 g - authorization policy to create/update via API

  Hello
  
  Anyone know if it is possible to day/create a permission policy to the OIM 11 G (11.1.1.5) via the API?
  I already managed to create an access policy, but can't get something like "AccessPolicyResourceData" for authorization policies in the API.
  
  THX!

  Haven't tried it but can you try PolicyDefinitionService.class or the OESPolicyService.class and check if it works for you?
  It has the following methods:

  createPolicy(AuthzPolicy paramAuthzPolicy)
  
  modifyPolicy(AuthzPolicy paramAuthzPolicy)
  
  deletePolicy(String paramString)
  

  HTH

• y at - it a detailed explanation of the advanced options?

  

  I was wondering if there is a document that details the options advanced.  The default values are selected to reject, refuse, drop.  However, if the user is not located and select continue instead to reject, what is the next step in authentication.

  Here are my exact question:

  If you select continue, where GBA seems next?

  Look for the following rule in this access policy or does go to the next access policy?

  Do not have a document but may try to explain in this post

  There are three cases which can apply this configuration and for each case three options control the behavior of

  The behavior of three options is:

  -Reject: send a rejection of demand response

  -Deposit: send no response on demand

  -Continue: continue to assess the conditions of authorization policy

  The three cases for which options can be configured are:

  -Failed authentication: user name were found in ID store but a password is incorrect or the user is disabled

  -Not found user: username was not found in one of the ID stores that have been assessed

  -Process failed: couldn't get a response from the ID store

  As I said, if continue is to select the continuous treatment to evaluate the permission policy for access service that was previously selected. No other service access is evaluated.

  Note that in the authorization policy, there is an additional attribute that can be used to determine the special cases which occurred during authentication. The attribute is "Authentication status" and can take the values of 'AuthenicationPassed', 'AuthenticationFailed', 'ProcessError', 'UnknwonUser '.

  So in the political authorization can define different results depending on the result of the "authentication status"; for example to set default VLAN

• 1.1.7 BIOS bug on XPS 13 (9350)

  Hello

  The latest BIOS 1.1.7 on the XPS 13 (9350) which increases the life of the battery for Windows users does not for Linux because of the SSD NVME users not be allowed to access the standby modes.

  At the start, several from ACPI error messages occur (see http://pastebin.com/8E6iXKMM ), here are a few:

  [0.155273] ACPI FADT says the system is not support PCIe ASPM, so turn it off

  [0.185298] [firmware bug]: ACPI: _OSI (Linux) ignored BIOS query

  [0.203571] ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, while assessing sleep state [\_S1_] (20150930/hwxface-580)

  [0.203580] ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, while assessing sleep state [\_S2_] (20150930/hwxface-580)

  ACPI [0.850917] PNP0C0B:00: cannot change to D0 power state

  ACPI [0.870806] PNP0C0B:00: can not the crossing of (unknown) D3hot

  Glances at Arch Linux forums and reddit/r/Dell, it seems that Linux users have not benefited from the last update of the BIOS. My system boots also all other time and the case ends with a black screen.

  No matter what other updates BIOS that we can expect to solve these problems?

  Thank you very much!

  more info about 1.1.7 buggy bios bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi

• Authorization of comments in ise 2.0

  Hi all

  I'll install 2.0 ise in one of the corporate network that has routed many branch, I have a few questions about the guest user permission policy.

  If authorization profile is configured with dynamic ACLs where I can give details of identification vlan for guest users consider id vlan for guest users is different for each branch? How guest users will obtain the IP address of rite VLAN?

  Hello

  If the VLAN is different on each location, you can make local switching AP instead of central switching within the WLC. This mode is called Flexconnect.

  In combination with ISE and Flexconnect CWA, you a few resources available on Cisco's Web site.

  I here copy a link to a step by step config:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-Eng...

  Hope this answer your question.

  PS: Please do not forget to rate and score as good response if this solves your problem

• Domain name of ISE, certificates and portal comments

  Hello world

  We have a deployment ISE using our internal domain for its FULL domain name (example: ise01.private.local). Now, we want to use for authentication of access as a guest and have noticed that the default redirect URL uses the FULL of the ISE Server domain name.

  It works very well for our business machines that we have our own generated certificates and internal certification authority. As we don't want a certificate, that the errors that occur for our clients, we need to use a public domain FULL name.

  Are we better off by changing the domain name used by the servers of the ISE, or is it possible to change the redirect URL to use a custom domain?

  I've heard suggestions that change the domain name is not supported, but I can't find another way.

  Thank you
  Mark

  Mark,

  You already have a public domain FULL name pointing to your ISE?  If so, let's assume that you authenticate you if you use a CWA.  First creat a new profile authorization, under common tasks, select redirect Web (CWA, DRW, MDM, DK, RPC), choose the authentication method (in this case, CWA) and set the ACL to use.  Just below, select the name of the static host/IP and enter the COMPLETE public domain name that points to your ISE.

  

  From there, you can create a permission policy to reference the profile that you just created.

  Please rate useful messages and mark this question as answered if, in fact, does that answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post additional questions.

  Charles Moreton