Hi all I HAV done an interface for a simple source data transfer to the target. When I run it, the records are stored in the target table. Now, I want to launch the interface (for the same or different source table) and add the records to existing records in the target table.
Kindly guide me, explaining how shud I do the addition in the target table.
Thanks in advance.
Hello
You can use the IKM control add... it will add records...
I am facing a problem in an interface and don't know why it's happening.
In my table target 'TBL_X', I have 100 records and table target 'TBL_Y', I'm 130 records! When I also 100 records to the target.
My target table is a fact table and my IKM is 'SQL control Apend' because the target I won't have a update, simply insert.
In my interface there are four research to collect the ID of Dim tables.
But I do not know why more records I have the source.
Do you have a person were faced with this or a similar problem?
Concerning
Thank you
My first impressions are that you entered twice in your lookup tables of dimension for the same value of research. I would check that first because it will probably be following your criteria to join in one or more of the tables you have found the issue.
I have a map where I fill in a column of my target table using a database sequence. Now my mapping is supposed to load the target gradually table. So I need a revenge for update and incremental insert. Now with this differential IKM it compares all the columns to match all colmuns line to understand, it should be an insert or update. Now, the following code shows that when the ROW_WID is loaded with a sequence of database.
If NOT EXISTS
(select 1 from W_LOV_D T
where T.ROW_WID = S.ROW_WID
and ((T.CREATED_BY = S.CREATED_BY) or (T.CREATED_BY IS NULL and S.CREATED_BY IS NULL)) and
Please suggest if there is no other IKM I should use or if there is another way around it without changing the code IKM...
Hi Marc,
Thanks for your reply.
I had solved it. The incremental update process inserts all rows from the source table to I$ table that exists in the target table. It does so by the where sql such as mentioned in my questions as
WHERE THERE is NOT ( . COLUMNS = . COLUMNS)
Now in the incremental update IKM Oracle to retrieve all the columns it uses the substitution with parameter as TABLE TARGET. Due to this column sequence will in the comparison and the request fails. When I used the IKM SQL incremental update it used INTEGRATION TABLE as parameter table to pick up the columns, as I'd mentioned in the target sequence is run, so it does not get the sequence column.
Simple answer: to solve this, use incremental update of the SQL IKM.
I developed a scenario in an interface, where I planned keeping the option Truncate as false, right there the data is been going to target without any problems, but when I changed the status of truncate to TRUE, the interface is been run, but the array is not get truncated, rather the data's been loading again to target. (when running manually, the target table is been truncated perfectly) but not in programming.
Can someone help me in this problem.
Thank you
Shakur.
Have you regenerate the scenario in question since you changed the option Truncate. If you have not the regular job must still run the old code
Oracle running on Oracle Linux 6.4 12.1.0.2.0 database:
During his studies of FUSION with invisible columns, I discovered that invisible columns in the target table cannot be read. Workaround seems to be
MERGE INTO (SELECT <column list> FROM <target table>) AS <alias>
However, the documentation does not seem to allow this. Here are the details.
Test data
> CREATE TABLE t_target(
k1 NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
c1 NUMBER,
i1 NUMBER invisible
)
table T_TARGET created.
> INSERT INTO t_target (k1,c1,i1)
SELECT 2, 2, 2 FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 3, 3 FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 4, 4, 4 FROM dual
3 rows inserted.
> CREATE TABLE t_source(
k1 NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
c1 NUMBER,
i1 NUMBER invisible
)
table T_SOURCE created.
> INSERT INTO t_source (k1,c1,i1)
SELECT 1, 1, 1 FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 2, 2, 9999 FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 3, 3 FROM dual
3 rows inserted.
First try
Please note that I have a WHERE clause in the WHEN MATCHED clause. Its purpose is to avoid the update of a row when data are already correct. The WHERE clause is trying to read the invisible column of the target table.
> MERGE INTO t_target o
USING (
SELECT k1, c1, i1 FROM t_source
) n
ON (o.k1 = n.k1)
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET
c1=n.c1, i1=n.i1
WHERE 1 IN (
decode(o.c1,n.c1,0,1),
decode(o.i1,n.i1,0,1)
)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT
(k1, c1, i1)
VALUES(n.k1, n.c1, n.i1)
...
Error at Command Line : 10 Column : 12
Error report -
SQL Error: ORA-00904: "O"."I1": invalid identifier
As you can see, I put a subquery after the USING clause so that 'n.i1' would be 'visible', but this is not enough since the 'I1' column in the target table is always invisible.
Second test
> MERGE INTO (
SELECT k1, c1, i1 FROM t_target
) o
USING (
SELECT k1, c1, i1 FROM t_source
) n
ON (o.k1 = n.k1)
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET
c1=n.c1, i1=n.i1
WHERE 1 IN (
decode(o.c1,n.c1,0,1),
decode(o.i1,n.i1,0,1)
)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT
(k1, c1, i1)
VALUES(n.k1, n.c1, n.i1)
2 rows merged.
Here I used a subquery in the INTO clause thus, and it worked.
Unfortunately, this does not seem to be admitted in the documentation: IN fact refers to a table or a view as schema objects.
My question is:
How can I refer to invisible columns in the target table without creating a new object? My workaround using a subquery solution seems to work very well, but can I recommend if it is not documented?
Can I replace a "inline view" for a view and still be supported?
During his studies of FUSION with invisible columns, I discovered that invisible columns in the target table cannot be read. Workaround seems to be
However, the documentation does not seem to allow this. Here are the details.
Here I used a subquery in the INTO clause thus, and it worked.
Unfortunately, this does not seem to be admitted in the documentation: IN fact refers to a table or a view as schema objects.
My question is:
How can I refer to invisible columns in the target table without creating a new object? My workaround using a subquery solution seems to work very well, but can I recommend if it is not documented?
Can I replace a "inline view" for a view and still be supported?
But the documentation DO ALLOWS not only! You use a view - a view online and those that can be changed in a MERGE statement.
All versions of the doc for FUSION since 9i specifically say this:
INTO clause
Use the INTO target clause to specify the table or view you are updating or inserting into. To merge the data in a view, the view must be updated. Please refer to the "Notes on the editable views" for more information.
Here are the links for the doc. 9i, 10g, 11g and c 12, ALL OF THEM (the last three), except 9i have this EXACT clause above.
9i doc does not have this specific quote in the INTO clause section, but it doesn't have that quote a little later:
Limitation of the update of a view
You cannot specify DEFAULT when refreshing a view.
You cannot update a column referenced in the ONcondition clause.
merge_insert_clause
The merge_insert_clause specifies the values to insert into the column of the target table, if the condition of the ON clause is false. If the insert clause is executed, then all insert triggers defined on the target table are activated.
Restrictions on the merger in a view
You cannot specify DEFAULT when refreshing a view.
If your "workaround" isn't really a workaround solution. You SHOULD use an inline view if you need to reference a column "invisible" in the target table, since otherwise, these columns are INVISIBLE!
My workaround using a subquery solution seems to work very well, but can I recommend if it is not documented?
I have provided the script below, I want to single fecth record in the second table in the join query,
based on the example below, I want to go get one record of the table emp2 what matches with the emp_id of table emp1, please note emp2 may contain more record for the emp_id emp1 which respects
My output should be the same as the result set of query above, but I don't want this logic, please provide the solution by using a different logic, thanks in advance.
2811876 wrote:
Thanks for your comments :-)
My business logic will change to 'Fetch N second timeline table', that's the reason why I asked for a different approach, if I use max, min to achieve this does not allow me to evolve dynamically.
Although logic has not been expressed at all in your original question, so good job I asked.
You could do something like:
SQL > ed A written file afiedt.buf
1 with emp1 (select 1 as the emp_id of union double all the) 2. Select 2 double 3 ) 4, emp2 (select 1 as emp_id, 'name 1' as emp_name double union all 5. Select "name 2' Union double every 2 6 select 1, 'name' 3' from dual union all 7. Select 2, 'name 4' double union all. 8 select 1, 'name 5' from dual union all '. 9 select 2, 'name 6' from dual '. 10 ) 11- 12. end of test data 13- 14 select emp_id, emp_name 15 of) 16 select t1.emp_id, t2.emp_name 17, row_number() over (partition by order of t2.emp_name t1.emp_id) rn emp1 t1 18 19 join t2 emp2 (t1.emp_id = t2.emp_id) 20 ) 21 * where rn<=> SQL > /.
Enter the value for rows_required: 1 21 Alumni: where rn<=> 21 news: where rn<=>
EMP_ID EMP_NA ---------- ------ 1 name 1 2 name 2
SQL > /. Enter the value for rows_required: 2 21 Alumni: where rn<=> 21 news: where rn<=>
EMP_ID EMP_NA ---------- ------ 1 name 1 1 name 3 2 name 2 2 name 4
Can someone tell me how to extract the date max of the target table.
Thank you.
Azhar
Sorry why again once you are not able to use the aggregator operator to get a max value. You don't need a group of when taking a max value what from a table, unless otherwise specified
Try it with a simple table b table card
table (several itemno)
table b (number maxitem)
Use aggregator and don't put anything in the section of owb agg transformation group. Generate the code and take a look
OWb, I try to update the target table with the game and the update on the same ground is this possible. I'm a match merge error indicating that you cannot update and match on the same ground. But in SQl is my selection
Update table define RFID = 0 where RFID = 1 and ID_processus = 'TEST '.
Can HWO I do this in OWB.
I have check but in the case later (last one) that he warns no error if you can go with it. and I tested it it works
You can check the first case (from where we start) if it has been warned and then try to run.
I created a map after import target tables in my ODI 12 C studio. The mapping is complete and it works without any errors. Now I intend to create some clues that I have an obligation to report. SO, I have to reimport these after creating indexes.
Thank you
SM
Hello
Here's the thing. The indexes that you created, if you plan to use as a unique index, or as your key to updating ODI you can go ahead and add the template manually in or hit the table again. However, if these indices are purely to make your report more quickly and will have no impact on you data loading then it is pointless to ODI. In the future when you make changes to the table and refresh it in ODI indexes will be added automatically.
I'm trying to add a record of the child to a resource DBAT (11.1.1.5). The structure of the Table is set up like this:
OIM_USR
Usr_key
First name
Last_name
OIM_ROLE
USR_KEY
ROLE_KEY
Where OIM_USR is the parent, and OIM_ROLE is the child that can store multiple values per user. The problem arises when there is already an existing value in the child table. Consider the following example for instance
OIM_USR
Usr_key
First name
Last_name
45
John
DOE
OIM_ROLE
USR_KEY
ROLE_KEY
45
2454
45
4453
If I add another line to the role of the identity UI table Edit tab added resource role, but IOM is remove the previous two lines and then adding them back. We know that it is because the source OIM_ROLE table contains a timestamp of creation triggered update time when a row is added. If I add a line to OIM_ROW then all three are getting updates for a reason any. We can also see the history of resource shows three updates. Inserting a record of the child should not call the process of update tasks. I've attached a screenshot of the history of the resource.
In addition, I upped the DBAT Connector logs and he showed a trace of remove:
DELETE FROM OIM_ROLES WHERE OIM_ROLES. USR_KEY =?
Why he deletes all children lines before an insertion?
I think you use OOTB DBAT connector without modification. I think that's how its design to add/change/delete files. For child process also updated form, we follow the same approach.
Are you facing any functional problem in connector DBAT to reach your use cases?
I hv created 2 tables as shown below the code sql. I want to insert some record (line current value) column of the first table, next sequence value and sysdate into second table. I hv created trigger but I gave warning. so I want to know what is the problem in my sql code. Pls correct!
SQL > CREATE TRIGGER MYTRIGGER 2 AFTER INSERT ON myuser1 3 FOR EACH LINE 4 BEGIN 5 INSERT INTO myuser2 (reg_no, reg_date, u_id) 6 VALUES (myuser2_seq.nextval, SELECT SYSDATE FROM DUAL, select u_id myuser) 1) 7 END; 8.
WARNING: Trigger created with compilation errors.
JKMourya wrote: I hv created 2 tables as shown below the code sql. I want to insert some record (line current value) column of the first table, next sequence value and sysdate into second table. I hv created trigger but I gave warning. so I want to know what is the problem in my sql code. Pls correct!
SQL > CREATE TRIGGER MYTRIGGER 2 AFTER INSERT ON myuser1 3 FOR EACH LINE 4 BEGIN 5 INSERT INTO myuser2 (reg_no, reg_date, u_id) 6 VALUES (myuser2_seq.nextval, SELECT SYSDATE FROM DUAL, select u_id myuser) 1) 7 END; 8.
WARNING: Trigger created with compilation errors.
SELECT inside VALUES clause is NOT allowed. do SELECT statements before the INSERT command
Two Tables Table1 has a primary key named ID column Tabel2 contains a column named table1_id, this is a foreign key to table1.
I have a tabular report that contains an add record button and a button submit to table1. (this table has other columns that require attribution)
I want to insert a record into table2 automatically whenever the user presses submit.
I have a query like this to get the last record in table1:
SELECT MAX(id)
FROM table1
and I would use it in a submit after procedure like this:
DECLARE v_id NUMBER;
BEGIN
SELECT MAX(id)
INTO v_id
FROM table1
INSERT
INTO table2(table1_id)
VALUES (v_id);
END;
The thing that worries me, is that the application that I use is a multi user environment. I'm afraid that if two or more people use as MAX recording is not the right one. It's a legitimate concern? If so, is there a best way to do this kind of thing.
Ben:
The triggers are usually avoidable IMO. But, there is always a but, you already use triggers elsewhere in your application, and probably your form the apex uses the routines of APEX MRU for DML and thus leaves the trigger as the only viable option to achieve what you're trying to do.
Summary Firefox abandons its http request in nearly 60 seconds (period till)waiting time varies) and says nothing to users. This has happened at a time ofNginx and Apache. Environment Client browser: Firefox 35.0.1Client OS: Windows 7 Enterprise 32-b
I have a new USB Flash Drive 32 DB/GB and I want to put all my music in my iTunes top. I saw instructions on apple, but they do not make sense. Help, please. Thank you.
Got the BEFW11S4 wireless 4 ports with the latest firmware. Connect my PC directly to the Comcast modem I get 16 Mbps download speed. Addition of my router (MODEM-> ROUTER-> PC) he falls up to 9 MB/s - so lose a helluva lot of bandwidth. And more obv
