Address - w-dynamic PIX 3000 LAN-to-LAN Configuration

Similar Questions

• Outlook Express: "address book failed to load. OE is configured incorrectly, please reinstall.

  Windows XP Home Edition. Suddenly cannot open my email. I searched the *.wab file and the 'read only' box is not checked. It is said that it has been changed a few days ago. I remember deleting an address duplicate at this time. What would I do? How should I do?

  Thank you

  If Office is/has been installed on this computer, see the reference by PA Bear in this thread
  http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/xpnetwork/thread/a8c8cf17-d792-481e-BCCA-13b03852a995

  If the Agency was never installed, check out these links. Don't worry, the references to older versions of OE. They still apply.

  Courtesy of Michael Santovec:
  http://pages.prodigy.NET/michael_santovec/techhelp.htm

  All of you who have the same cause.  Something is screwed up with your address book.

  It could be several specific problems, which include:
  -corrupted WAB file
  -damaged or incompatible DLL files for the addressbook
  -have OE set to use the Outlook98 / 2000 + contacts instead of the WAB
  folder and there is something wrong at the end of Outlook

  For more details, take a look at:

  Error message: the Message could not be sent. Some invalid recipients
  (Outlook Express: there was an error opening this message)
  (The address book failed to load. OE is configured incorrectly)
  (Corrupted or incompatible WAB32. DLL file)
  http://support.Microsoft.com/?kbid=239135
  OLEXP: Error Message: failed to load address book
  (There was an error opening this message)
  http://support.Microsoft.com/?kbid=269777
  http://support.Microsoft.com/?kbid=310873
  OLEXP: MSIMN has caused an IPF in Module Wab32.dll
  http://support.Microsoft.com/?kbid=247706
  Error message: failed to load address book, Outlook Express is...
  http://support.Microsoft.com/?kbid=191946
  Error message: could not open address book, a component is missing
  http://support.Microsoft.com/?kbid=192321

  The address book Windows (WAB)
  http://www.insideoe.com/files/WAB.htm

  To share Contacts between Outlook and Outlook Express
  http://www.slipstick.com/contacts/oeshare.htm

  Bruce Hagen
  MS - MVP October 1, 2004 ~ September 30, 2010
  Imperial Beach, CA

• VPN concentrator + PIX on LAN-> customers can not reach local servers

  Hello

  I have a problem wrt. remote access clients coming via a VPN3000 concentrator and trying to access local servers.

  For the topology:

  The internal network is 10.0.1.0/24. It connects with the outside world, as well as via a PIX DMZ; the PIX has 10.0.1.1 in the internal network.

  On the same LAN (internal), I have the VPN concentrator for the inside address 10.0.1.5. It assigns addresses in the 10.0.100.0/24 range to the

  VPN client-PCs.

  I can sucessfully connect using the VPN client SW to the hub, i.e. remote access clients out addresses

  the 10.0.100.0/24 range.

  The problem: access from VPN clients to internal network is * not * possible; for example, a customer with 10.0.100.1 cannot connect to

  internal to the 10.0.1.28 server.

  To my knowledge, this is a routing problem because the server (10.0.1.28) has no idea on how to reach customers in

  10.0.100.0/24. The only thing that the server is a default static route pointing to the PIX, i.e. 10.0.1.1.

  So I set up a static route on the PIX for 10.0.100.0 pointing to the hub-VPN, that is

  Mylan route 10.0.100.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.1.5 1

  This does not solve my problem though.

  In the PIX logs, I see the entries as follows:

  % 3 PIX-106011: deny entering (no xlate) tcp src trainee: 10.0.1.28 (atlas) / 445 intern dst: 10.0.100.1 (pending) 1064

  The PIX seems to abandon return packages, i.e. traffic from the server back to the client

  To my knowledge, the problem seems to be:

  Short traffic VPN - client-> Concentrator VPN-> Server-> PIX - where it gets moved.

  My reasoning: the PIX only sees the package back, i.e. the package back from the server to the client - and therefore decreasing the

  package because he has not seen the package from the client to the server.

  So here are my questions:

  (o) how do I configure the PIX that I be connectivity between my remote VPN clients (10.0.100.0/24) and

  computers servers on the local network (10.0.1.0/24)?

  (o) someone else you have something like this going?

  PS: Please note that the first obvious idea, installation of static routes on all machines on the local network is not an option here.

  Thank you very much in advance for your help,.

  -ewald

  Hello, PIX the because can not route traffic on the same interface (prior to version 7.0 anyway), I suggest you two places your hub to the outside with the inside of the legs on a zone demilitarized or (if you can not do a makeover of the network) you remove your pool with 10.0.100.0 - addresses and create a pool with 10.0.1.0 - addresses which is a part of the address space. No, NOT all. A little book that it is not used inside.

  Best regards

  Robert Maras

• NAT via LAN-to-LAN configuration between router IOS and Cisco VPN 3000

  Hello

  I have the following document on the creation of a virtual LAN2LAN including NAT private network.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00801ae24c.shtml

  It? s easily do this with the hub. Now, I have to set it up on the IOS router, and for this purpose, I can? t find any information. NAT, I have my private network to a single IP address that must be by tunnel as my local network official.

  Anyone have documentation on this szenario? I can? t is not on the OCC.

  Thanks for the support

  Hello.

  Concentrators are very friendly units (IMHO) to VPN with NAT and VPN.

  You build an acl defined traffic over the vpn (110) based on the nat wouldn't

  You create an acl to set what is NAT had (111) and create a NAT statement accordingly

  Here is an example configuration.

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  vpnsrock crypto isakmp key! address x.x.x.x

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

  !

  10 VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined peer x.x.x.x

  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA

  match address 110

  !

  interface Fa0

  NAT outside IP

  VPN crypto card

  !

  !

  interface fa1

  IP nat inside

  !

  IP nat inside source list 111 interface fa0 overload

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 y.y.y.y

  access-list 110 permit ip fa0 - ip network-remote control-generic generic-mask

  access-list 111 allow local-network ip network-remote control-generic generic-mask

  !

• Problems with VPN PIX 525 Lan-to-Lan Cisco 2610XM

  Hello world

  I have a VPN with PIX 525 versi problems? n 7.2 (1) and Cisco 2610XM Version 12.3 (18). When start the PIX, all tunnels works well, but 6-7 days, some of the tunnels do not work properly. Traffic passes the tunnel with some networks, but not with all networks. Sometimes the tunnel descends and it is imposible to go upward.

  Attach them files are the "debug crypto isakmp" in both devices.

  Thank you and sorry for my bad English

  If your configuration of the tunnel on router 7500 series, the tunnel interface are not supported for politicians to service in the tunnel interfaces on 7500

• Router for IP addresses public multiples go to LAN

  The customer has a Cisco RVS4000. There are 3 Internet devices must be accessible from the outside and use a public IP address for a single device. I see no option configuration on Cisco RVS4000 do 3 NAT. If Cisco RVS4000 does not work in this case, what router do?

  RV042G, RV180, RV180W, RV220W and all support them NAT 1 to 1, which allows multiple public IP addresses be mapped to IP addresses in the local network.

• DHCP service provides addresses to workstations on the LAN

  I am running Workstation version 6.5.3 build 185404 (recently updated) twice this week, I caught the service DHCP provides IP addresses to other positions in paid work (Physics) using DHCP. I have not experienced this problem in the past with previous versions. Everyone knows about this problem? For now I stopped the service that solves the problem, but only as a temporary work around.

  Thank you

  The only time that needs to happen is if you accidentally light one of the VMnet virtual network adapters on your host to one of the physical network adapters on your host.

• shared variable LAN configuration

  Hello everyone,

  I have a problem with deployment variable published network share and I hope that the experts of Labview in this forum could help me.

  I'm contacting a compactRIO (IP 192.168.10.100) via the published network shared variable. 32-bit LabVIEW version 2014. CompactRIO is AES.

  On the target, computer laptop, there is a port LAN (the usual) and it is used to connect to the internet with the IP (for example 10.115.22.200). There is also a USB adapter to ethernet, and it is used to connect to the compactRIO using IP 192.168.10.10. I am able to ping the compactRIo of the laptop.

  I called up the Manager of distributed system, but I couldn't see the compactRIO. I could see all the other devices on the 10.115.22.200 network.

  My question is, is it possible to set up a laptop with two IP addresses (192.168.10.10 and 10.115.22.200) with different subnets? I suspect that this is not possible and this is the reason why I do not see the compactRIO.

  Thanks in advance for your advice.

  chati

  Yes, shared variables are deployed.

  There is a solution. Apparently affecting USB) 1 Ethernet adapter to the network of 'Home' and 2) gateway defaults to the IP address of the cRIO, solves the problem.

  Thanks for the suggestions and the entries of Sam and natasftw.

  Your

  chati

• 3424 on LAN configuration

  Hi, I want to configure the 3424 via a connection to the local network using the Ethernet serial converter. Does anyone have any experience or recommendations to the use of such a facility? I guess I have to install some kind of drivers COM port on my computer can be used by the converter.

  Just to answer my own question; I ended up buying this converter: http://www.nordfield.com/rs232-ethernet-converter and I found that it was actually pretty easy to make it work. Simply connect the 3424 to the serial port of the inverter, connect the end of the LAN of the computer. Install the virtual COM software for the converter, and then the software will automatically search for and find the 3424. I can then communicate with him via the COM port that created the software. A very neat configuration that was easier to do then I expected.

• Several public address on a Pix outside interface spaces

  I currently have a pix (6.3) with the external interface configured as part of a public ip address space of 27 bits. We are running out of addresses and need to buy another beach. Can I make this work using the pix existing and without alteration of the existing range in use? Basically, can I get a new address to my existing pix space and configure static for this space, even if the interface is assigned an ip address on another beach?

  YES, you can do quite easily.

  Example: your external interface is

  129.174.1.1/27. Now, you want to add another

  141.141.141.0/24 to your external interface.

  Is this correct?

  The technique is to use the Routing IP NAT Pool.

  In this example, you add a static route

  on the router upstream like this:

  IP route 141.141.141.0 255.255.255.0 129.174.1.1

  Now you can make static on the pix as NAT

  this:

  static (i, o) 141.141.141.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  Easy right?

• problem; No secondray of ip address allowed on PIX

  Hi enfineers;

  I have 3 email server on the inside, outside and in the demilitarized zone.

  each of them must communicate with each other .i gave inside an invalid ip address.

  DMZ and oueside each of them have a valid but in another range to achieve a purpose.

  So what I have to do special dmz and outeside communicateable.

  any comment is appreciated.

  Hello

  So what I understood from your email

  -You have 3 email servers. Each of them is inside, outside and dmz and you want to make communication allow all three.

  If the above is the case, then don't forget the following rules

  -If you go to safe area higher to the lower security zone (inside the area demilitarized or inside outwards or dmz for outside) so you must use nat and global declarations

  -If you come from security zone than the security zone higher (like outdoors indoors or outside dmz or demilitarized zone, inside) then you must create static translations for the machines that you want to make visible to the lower security areas and open the access list for those who translated the IPS with the correct destination ports.

  Hope the above helps

  Thank you

  Zia

• BONES of PIX v6.3: Load Balancing Configuration

  Using the new feature of balancing by OSPF, is it possible to create a parallel table of the PIX to simulate a "dynamic load balancing environment"? Please explain why or not.

  If the answer is no, then, is it possible to create an environment of load balancing 'static '? How would this work? advantages and disadvantages?

  Kind regards.

  Fix... You need something in front of and behind the Pix to ensure that a session is maintained through the same Pix. This can also be done by NAT.

• PIX 525 config and VPN configuration

  Hello

  I was asked to work on a customer request to replave sound no cisco FW with a pix 525 and also lead to a VPN solution using this PIX 525.

  I'm not a FW as my main experience is with Routing/Switching, but I have read some documentation and had some hands on a client of vpn300 501 PIX and cisco.  I managed to make it appear the vpn connection, even if all tests have failed (you need to solve any further).

  Customer has its main site with an application that runs on a Web server that must be accessed only through the vpn to: 3rd party + a few remote users.

  The solution, I want to propose to the client is:

  option 1:

  PIX 525 as a vpn server + Cisco vpn 3000 client on all PCs of remote users.

  option 2:

  PIX 525 as a vpn server + vpn client windows on all PCs of remote users

  option 3:

  PIX 525 as vpn + PIX 501 to 3 rd party server + vpn client windows on all PCs of remote users

  First I want to confirm that these motions are feasible.  So which option should I go for knowing that the remote users are only about 10.

  Client doesn't no Ganymede or RADIUS should go for statis userid/pass set up on PIX525?

  Any idea, advice, suggestion is welcome.  Thanks in advance

  Kind regards

  ngtelecom

  Hello

  Option 1

  In my opinion, is the best solution because the PIX 525 will act as a firewall and the VPN server.

  Then, all the clients connect via VPN using Cisco's VPN IPsec client software.

  Option 2

  The advantage of this option is that you do not need to install VPN software on clients (not a problem, only 10 clients)

  The problem is that it does not come with split tunneling and don't provide as good protection as Cisco software.

  Option 3

  This is also valid, and you can do an EasyVPN connection where the 525 is the server and the 501 to the customer.

  Local authentication on the PIX 525 sounds great.

  As a recommendation, the PIX are EoS and the replacement are the ASAs.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• Syslog. Include the address IP of VTY in each message (the configuration changes)

  Hello guys,.

  I discovered that Huawei has a syslog messages different format when it comes to saving the configuration changes in external syslog, however if in Cisco you use a universal login for many users, it is impossible to know what connected IP address who commands...

  I know, a solution would be to allow all users to use its own login, however, I wanted to know is possible for a Cisco router associate the vty from the payer 'connected command' and include this information in Syslog.

  Here is the example for Huawei:

  %%10SHELL/5/cmd (l): - DevIP = 10.219.3.2 - 2 - task: vt0 ip:10.200.7.138 user: * command: display buffer

  Cisco has kind of understands the final message where says what was the IP address of the VTY, however, this IP address is not present in each message syslog like Huawei.

  68954: 168799: sep 22 14:29:21.839: % PARSER-5-CFGLOG_LOGGEDCMD: user: XXXXX connected command: no connection host 10.200.100.10 transport udp port 515

  68952: 168796: 14:18:25.341 Sep 22: % PARSER-5-CFGLOG_LOGGEDCMD: user: XXXXX connected command: exit

  68953: 168797: sep 22 14:18:26.053: % SYS-5-CONFIG_I: configured from console by XXXXX on vty5 (10.200.7.138)

  Is it possible to do something similar in Cisco

  If you Splunk or another business journal reports server you can correlate these events by building a transaction whenever you see a % SYS-5-CONFIG_I event. I have support for this in my application of networks Cisco for Splunk: https://apps.splunk.com/app/1352/ & https://apps.splunk.com/app/1467/

  Take a look and see what you think.

• Need help on the issue with wireless connectivity on Win7 - dynamic key exchange did not within configured time

  Hello

  I get below error when you try to connect to the wireless router. It was working fine until a few days back.

  InterfaceGuid {1F8AA774-8AE0-48BA-87EB-5522A6070F3E}
  InterfaceDescription Dell 1540 802.11a/g/n (2.4 GHz/5 GHz) Wireless
  ConnectionMode automatic connection with a profile
  BSSType infrastructure
  Key exchange dynamic FailureReason failed within configured time
  Used 294917
  ConnectionId 0x9

  What is the reason code 294917?

  Any help to solve the problem would be useful.

  Kind regards

  Srinivasa

  Hi Richard,

  Thanks for the quick response.

  I tried diff incl. power options. Nothing has worked.

  Finally, I reset my router unit today and it works now.

  Hope that this issue would not yet :-)

  Kind regards

  Srinivasa