Affect the size of paper in the drawer - Canon - C5250i

Similar Questions

• 'For' loop with a different number of iterations. Second, the auto-indexation of the tables with different sizes is done. It can affect the performance of the Vi?

  Hello

  I have a loop 'for' which can take different number of iterations according to the number of measures that the user wants to do.

  Inside this loop, I'm auto-indexation four different 1 d arrays. This means that the size of the tables will be different in the different phases of the execution of the program (the size will equal the number of measures).

  My question is: the auto-indexation of the tables with different sizes will affect the performance of the program? I think it slows down my Vi...

  Thank you very much.

  My first thought is that the compiler to the LabVIEW actually removes the Matlab node because the outputs are not used.  Once you son upward, LabVIEW must then call Matlab and wait for it to run.  I know from experience, the call of Matlab to run the script is SLOW.  I also recommend to do the math in native LabVIEW.

• problems affecting the correct size of fonts

  I have problems affecting the correct size of the font in mail and print, how do I return the policy to the original settings?

  Hello
  • What mail client do you use?
   
  It depends on what email client / browser you are using.
  Each browser / email client must have the print properties which should allow the user to adjust the print size.

  If you use IE, check the zoom settings. Do follow link below:

  http://www.Microsoft.com/enable/training/windowsvista/webzoom.aspx

• Reduce the size of the image without affecting the animation

  After hurt, I realized that the images that he I scanned are even too high resolution for my computer HD.  For my next project, I know, but for this project, is it be possible to know how to reduce these images in an appropriate way and replace so that I won't have to do any new images keys or something? A way that I can just edit the files in Photoshop and ask them to update to be low res in AE without affecting their size?

  Generally, there is no simple solution to this problem.  Simplify your life by resizing your images in Photoshop by a fixed amount, for example 50%.  Then re-scale in After Effects the appropriate amount.

  If there is an animation based on the scale on the layers, you can add a Null value to your model, parent the value Null to the layer in question and the scale of the signal zero the amount appropriate.  You can delete the Null value when you are finished.

• increase the font size without affecting the spacing

  Hi, when I change the font size, why does affect the vertical spacing of lines of text in a textbox? the principal is the same, but when I change a single line to police 13, with the rest at 10, it bumps a line downwards out of the text box and the rest of the text is not aligned with the opposite page. Is it possible to increase the size of the font of a line without affecting the spacing? Basically I want the lines and space out them to be the same for each page, I'm not sure I know the proper way to do it. Currently, I attack at 13.6 and spacing of the paragraphs to 13.6

  In this case, you can change the Options of object Style for the basic text frame - basic front-line Options. Change it through instead of ascension.

  Window > object Styles

  Double-click on the [basic text frame]

  

  The first line will then honor your fixed attack.

  Edit: If your policy is increased sufficiently, so the characters can extend beyond the top of the text block. You should be fine with 13 points, however.

  Post edited by: MT Freelance

• Library affects the size of the swf file?

  When I first learned Flash (oh, so long), I learned that unused items in your library would affect the the file size of your swf file. Is this true?

  unused items do not affect the size of the swf file at least export for actionscript is checked.  in this situation, they affect the size of SWF that it is used or not.

• Column (varchar2) size does affect the performance of database?

  Hi friends,
  
  I have a table with most of the fields with the varchar2 data type and size of more than 1000. 99% of the scenarios I have no values greater than 100 size column, but as a precaution, I gave more than size. This affects the performance of the database or allocates more space in the tablespace? ...... Or it is fine if I have plus size column since it is a varchar2.
  
  Database: Oracle 11g
  
  Need your advice.
  
  
  
  Kind regards
  Suresh

  On disk, a VARCHAR2 column consumes only the number of bytes required to store the actual data. A string of 4 bytes in a column VARCHAR2 (1000) will consume only 4 bytes of space on the disk.

  Memory is a separate issue. In the structures of memory that deals with blocks (i.e. the cache buffers), blocks are identical to the blocks on the drive, so you would only store 4 bytes in the SGA for the VARCHAR2 field in the row discussed above. When you start writing PL/SQL code, however, Oracle can pre-allocate space for the VARCHAR2 variable. In PL/SQL, Oracle could pre-allocate 1000 bytes if you declare a VARCHAR2 variable (1000). However, Oracle would not pre-allocate memory if you declare a variable VARCHAR2 (3000) (here, the cutoff is 2000 bytes, see this askTom thread).

  Client network and the performance of allocation memory still is another problem. If you have a client application that is fetch data from the database, it has probably declare one large enough to hold the maximum size of each column in the result set, that it is fetching buffer. Related to this, the client application must be able to display the largest size of each field - if you allow a VARCHAR2 column (1000) but the GUI dies if you have over 100 bytes in the field, you have a problem.

  Finally and most importantly, is the model number of database. Columns should be sized to accept the amount of data required. It's a poor practice to declare tons of VARCHAR2 (1000) fields rather than appearing on the actual data size limits you want to apply and declare the columns for these fields sized correctly. Because it would be unwise to have a string of 500 bytes in a column of the CITY in a database, it wouldn't make sense to build a data model that would allow this situation.

  Justin

• affect the quality of the thumbnails in fotos-app

  iPhone and iPad have enough capacity for a better quality of thumbnails in fotos-app, but not enough for the original library. Is there a setting to affect the quality of the thumbnails? Synchronization by iTunes crates a library with sufficient stamps or vouchers but fotos download each image icloud.

  Another way would be to affect the fotos are downloaded and saved! Maybe special or more recent albums.

  Someone at - it a trick? Excuse the mistakes in English, a foreign language for me.

  What are you trying to do, Schiffmann?  You want to synchronize selected iTunes Sync of Photo albums, or you want to use iCloud photo library?

  • If you synchronize with iCloud photo library, pictures of your iCloud photo library can be synced to your iPad, you can not be selective.  However, you can activate "Optimization of storage", so only small versions will be stored on the iPad. The size of these smaller versions is determined automatically, you cannot influence that.
  • If you want to only synchronize selected photos from a library of iCloud, do your little photo library iCloud. Create two libraries on your Mac - one for synchronization with iCloud and the other with the photos you want on your mobile devices.

  https://help.Apple.com/photos/Mac/1.0/?lang=en#/pht6d60b524

• Optical Aberration correction 7DM 2 does affect the image RAW or just JPEG?

  New 7DM 2. If the optical Aberration Correction is activated in the menu of this does affect the RAW image and JPEG files or any size JPEG created? My new camera first stoopid question! Did not answer in the manual!

  There are no stupid questions here

  Lens corrections will be recognized and applied to JPEG in RAW if you use Canon DPP. If you use Lightroom or any other software other than Canon that they are not recognized.  Lightroom has its own set of Canon lens correction profiles.

• I am unable to open the drawer of the dvd can help you

  I inserted the DVD to transfer my photo file but now cannot open the drawer

  Hello

  To add to the advice of Fixer Upper:

  For the readers of the status bar:

  Sometimes they get stuck. There is a small hole on the front of the CD drive that you can stick a
  a paper clip that will release him and the reader to open.

  Create a trombone in car Opener
  http://pcsupport.about.com/od/tipstricks/HT/ppdropen.htm

  Open a CD/DVD player with a paper clip.
  http://www.josepino.com/?open_cd-dvd_paperclip

  =================================

  For the readers of the slot:

  Check with the manufacturer of system on how do to eject the disc.

  Dell xps m1330 dvd drive will not eject cd inside<-- check="" these="">
  http://www.FixYa.com/support/t2643828-dell_xps_m1330_dvd_drive_will_not_eject

  Be careful as you may damage the player using the method below:
  
  You may need to get the driver to work 1 However, this could still work.
  http://www.tech-tweak.NET/2009/11/how-to-eject-STUK-DVD-from-slot-load.html

  The method used on the Mac could work
  http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=wpWieIoBBrk

  How to disassemble the laptop (Dell XPS M1330)<--- voids="" any="" warranty!="" this="" is="" an="">
  http://ahwee.com/how-to-disassemble-laptop-Dell-XPS-M1330

  Also have heard double tape on a credit card or play can work.

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle="" -="" mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

• 'Open the drawer out press ok' message with the tray open output and pressed OK.

  'Open the drawer out press ok' message with the tray open output and pressed OK. Seems that the device does not believe that the drawer is open. This has happened directly after deletion of a paper jam.

  Sometimes a small part being out of alignment can make a sensor turn off inside the printer, so make sure you put everything back together right first.  Although you to act this way, looks at the printer closely for any broken pieces.  If you do not see what has obviously broken, try to do a hard reset.  Instructions that are below.  If the hard reset does not clear the error, the output bin sensor may be broken.  If this is the case, you will need to get a new printer, as the sensor is not repairable.

  To do a hard reset:
  1. make sure that the printer is turned on.
  2. pull on the power cord from the printer.
  3. pull out the power cord from the wall.
  4. wait for 30 seconds.
  5. plug in the printer and turn it on.

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• Quick display of Web pages - how does this affect the document?

  Hi all

  I find conflicting information on the option "Optimize for Fast Web View", which is enabled by default on most predefined PDF conversion setting.

  I use the PDFmaker plugin (installed CC 2016) to convert Microsoft Word (2016 installed) to PDF files for printing. Word files contain the text, tables, images and objects MS really about anything that you can put in a Word file. These files are produced for web applications and press, so I'm mostly concerned about high quality print presets and press quality, if that makes a difference.

  If I understand correctly, the device is intended to linearize the document. According to the help guide online to distill:

  Restructures the file for faster access (page-at-a-time of download,) or byte serving of web servers. This option compresses text and line art, the substitution of compression on the Images Panel selections.

  Adobe PDF conversion settings

  However, I found the following in the forums

  For at least the Adobe applications that produce PDFS, the Optimize for fast Web view results option in no difference in the quality of the resulting PDF file. Yes, the file is a bit bigger, but there is no difference in quality.

  Optimize the PDF for fast Web view

  Thus, this option really makes a difference in the appearance of the PDF?

  Thanks in advance!

  Fast web view shouldn't affect the quality somehow, unless it is combined with other changes. I think I can see the source of your dilemma.

  This option compresses text and line art, the substitution of selections of compression on the Images Panel.

  Compression of text and line art should always be done because it has no impact on the quality. A form of ZIP compression is used, not JPEG. The text is stored as strings to display; line drawing is stored as coordinates to fill. There is no possibility of destructive compression.

• Where can I get a decent tutorial for the drawing of photoshop for ipad application?

  One I see here on the Adobe website doesn't help - I see not what is affecting the narrator and his presentation of the screen is different to mine, so I'm lost before it even started. I am based in the United Kingdom - but I can't imagine why that would be important.

  Hopefully I can help...

  Hi Rie.

  There is SO little. Really. It's on my list of things that we need. For now, I like it better; It is not very common, but most of the features and functions are still very similar: ch http://tv.adobe.com/watch/learn-photoshop-cc/quickly-draw-and-share-concepts-in-adobe-sket /

  Let me know if it helps. Or does not work.

  Sue.

• I have Acrobat Pro on my computer and I work with the drawing that have been digitized in PDF format. The scanners are not aligned or place because of the poor scanning process. Anyway is to align the document even if it requires me to crop or lose

  I have Acrobat Pro on my computer and I work with the drawing that have been digitized in PDF format. The scanners are not aligned or place because of the poor scanning process. Is there anyway to align the document even if it requires me to crop or lose some on the edges?

  Hi brad.

  Yes. You can use the analysis tools to straighten and crop your document. Here is a link to a new tutorial. The key to activate the sliding options recovery is to choose the option of the camera Image in the drop to Enhance, and gives you tools to set the correct page for smoothing areas.

  fundamental https://helpx.adobe.com/Acrobat/How-to/scan-Paper-documents-Searchable-PDF.html?Set=Acroba--principes t - create a pdf file

  Donna.