Analyzer memory?

Similar Questions

• Leak memory caused by JavaPolicyProvider

  Hello

  After a lot of testing, I finally found what slows our ADF application, I was unable to have more than 200 concurrent users in daintiness of our ADF application. I made a report analyze of the heapdump 'Eclipse-Analyzer' memory, and here are the results:

  Loaded a single instance 'oracle.security.jps.internal.policystore.JavaPolicyProvider' of ' Sun.misc.Launcher$appclassloader$ AppClassLoader @ 0x1971c738 ' care 395,790,808 (62,10%) bytes. Memory is accumulated in a case ' oracle.security.jps.util.ReferenceMapFactory$ SoftKeyHashMap ' support of ' Sun.misc.Launcher$appclassloader$ AppClassLoader @ 0x1971c738 '.

  I found this post from December ' 09, where someone is having a similar problem. Unfortunately, I have not found any related on metalink.

  https://community.Oracle.com/thread/2142245

  I added the recommended the managed server JVM settings and my results are better.

  -XX: SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB = 100 - XX: + ParallelRefProcEnabled

  
  

  So, no don't know what could be wrong in my application to force me to have theses settings?

  Jdev 11.1.1.7

  WLS 10.3.6

  Thank you

  Guillaume

  Loaded a single instance 'oracle.security.jps.internal.policystore.JavaPolicyProvider' of ' Sun.misc.Launcher$appclassloader$ AppClassLoader @ 0x1971c738 ' care 395,790,808 (62,10%) bytes. Memory is accumulated in a case ' oracle.security.jps.util.ReferenceMapFactory$ SoftKeyHashMap ' support of ' Sun.misc.Launcher$appclassloader$ AppClassLoader @ 0x1971c738 '.

  I have

  -XX: SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB = 100 - XX: + ParallelRefProcEnabled

  It seems that there are only two solutions, the addition of these two parameters -XX: SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB = 100 - XX: + ParallelRefProcEnabled but I have the impression that they consume a lot of memory when users are connected (but memory is published when they connect) or using JRockit.

  We decided to move to JRockit, since it does not have this problem, and it is more efficient.

  Thank you

• After the effect CC 2015 - KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE (memory dump)

  Hello

  As is obvious, I had a problem after installation of AE and it gives me a blue screen with a message above (KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE). It seems that there is a failure of memory between AE and another software or driver. So I analyzed Memory.DMP file with WinDbg and gave me a result below.

  As you can see, I discovered, file dxgkrnl.sys with AEGPUSniffer.e process of do a memory crash. I have to say befor installation AE I uninstalled drivers for my graphics card (Geforce and Intell) and installed a pilot seller directly but AE has a problem with DirectX. (my edition of DirectX is 12)

  
  

  Here is the Configuration of my system:

  
  

  Laptop: HP with a UEFI Firmware (start secure power off)
  

  Windows 10 edition 10586

  RAM: 16 GB

  Graphics cards: Intel internal (1 GB) and dedicated Geforce GTX (4 GB)
  

  CPU: 2.3 GH core i7 (quad core and 8 logical processors)

  HARD DRIVE: 1 TB

  All drivers up to date

  
  

  Well, any help will be appreciated. If there is no any way to make it correct, can I do it just with a new edition of EI or will be the same?
  

  
  

  
  

  Debug version of Microsoft Windows (R) 10.0.10586.567 X 86

  Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

  Loading dump file [C:\Users\Babak\Desktop\MEMORY. DMP]

  The Bitmap core dump file: the kernel address space is available, the user address space will be may not be not available.

  Symbol search path is: srv *.

  Executable search path is:

  Windows Kernel Version 10586 MP (8 procs) free x 64 10

  Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS

  By: 10586.17.amd64fre.th2_release.151121 - 2308

  Computer name:

  Core = 0xfffff802 '6fa00000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0xfffff802' 6fcdec70

  The debugging session: killed Dec 29 01:11:09.512 2015 (UTC + 08:00)

  System Uptime: 0 days 0:00:54.331

  Loading the kernel symbols

  ........................................................... Page 105d4a not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  ....

  ................................................................

  .................................................

  Loading user symbols

  PEB is paginated on (Peb.Ldr = 00000000' 002e2018).  Type ".hh dbgerr001" for more details

  Loading unloaded module list

  .........

  *******************************************************************************

  *                                                                            *

  * Bugcheck analysis *.

  *                                                                            *

  *******************************************************************************

  Use! analyze - v to obtain detailed debugging information.

  Error checking 139, {3, ffffd00024267490, ffffd000242673e8, 0}

  Page 11b 860 not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  Page 110e88 not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  110515 page not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  Page 1280 not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  Page 1280 not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  Page 1280 not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  Probably caused by: dxgkrnl.sys (dxgkrnl! DXGDEVICE::DestroyAllDeviceState + 1cb)

  Follow-up: MachineOwner

  ---------

  7: kd >! analyze - v

  *******************************************************************************

  *                                                                            *

  * Bugcheck analysis *.

  *                                                                            *

  *******************************************************************************

  KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE (139)

  A core component has damaged a critical data structure.  Corruption

  could potentially allow a malicious user to take control of this machine.

  Arguments:

  Arg1: 0000000000000003, a LIST_ENTRY has been corrupted (i.e. double deletion).

  Arg2: ffffd00024267490, the address of the frame of trap for the exception that caused the error checking

  Arg3: ffffd000242673e8, address of the exception record for the exception that caused the error checking

  Arg4: 0000000000000000, reserved

  Debugging information:

  ------------------

  110515 page not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  Page 1280 not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  Page 1280 not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  Page 1280 not present in the dump file. Type ".hh dbgerr004" for more details

  DUMP_CLASS: 1

  DUMP_QUALIFIER: 401

  BUILD_VERSION_STRING: 10586.17.amd64fre.th2_release.151121 - 2308

  SYSTEM_MANUFACTURER: Hewlett-Packard

  SYSTEM_PRODUCT_NAME: HP ENVY 15 Notebook PC

  SYSTEM_SKU: K8U61PA #UUF

  SYSTEM_VERSION: 097F120000405F10000310100

  BIOS_VENDOR: Insyde

  BIOS_VERSION: F.22

  BIOS_DATE: 25/11/2014

  BASEBOARD_MANUFACTURER: Hewlett-Packard

  BASEBOARD_PRODUCT: A 22-0

  BASEBOARD_VERSION: KBC Version 83.12

  DUMP_TYPE: 1

  BUGCHECK_P1: 3

  BUGCHECK_P2: ffffd00024267490

  BUGCHECK_P3: ffffd000242673e8

  BUGCHECK_P4: 0

  TRAP_FRAME: ffffd00024267490-(.trap 0xffffd00024267490)

  NOTE: The frame trap does contain not all registers.

  Some registry values can be set to zero or incorrect.

  Rax = ffffe0017d079730 rbx = 0000000000000000 rcx = 0000000000000003

  RDX = ffffe0017d045890 rsi = 0000000000000000 rdi = 0000000000000000

  RIP = fffff8026fb59d82 rsp = ffffd00024267620 rbp = ffffd00024267729

  R8 = ffffc001f8dfe3f0 r9 = 0000000000000003 r10 = 7fffc001f8dfe3f0

  R11 = 7ffffffffffffffc r12 = 0000000000000000 r13 = 0000000000000000

  R14 = 0000000000000000 r15 = 0000000000000000

  iopl = 0 nv up ei pl nz na po cy

  NT! : FNODOBFM: 'string' + 0x8c82:

  fffff802'6fb59d82 cd29 int h 29

  Reset the default scope

  EXCEPTION_RECORD: ffffd000242673e8-(.exr 0xffffd000242673e8)

  ExceptionAddress: fffff8026fb59d82 (nt! FNODOBFM: 'string' + 0x0000000000008c82)

  ExceptionCode: c0000409 (security check failure or stack of saturation of buffer)

  ExceptionFlags: 00000001

  NumberParameters: 1

  Parameter [0]: 0000000000000003

  Sub-code: 0 x 3 FAST_FAIL_CORRUPT_LIST_ENTRY

  CPU_COUNT: 8

  CPU_MHZ: 8f7

  CPU_VENDOR: GenuineIntel

  CPU_FAMILY: 6

  CPU_MODEL: 3 c

  CPU_STEPPING: 3

  CPU_MICROCODE: 6, 3 c, 3, 0 (F, M, S, R) GIS: 1st ' 00000000 (cache) 1 ' 00000000 (init)

  DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: LIST_ENTRY_CORRUPT

  BUGCHECK_STR: 0 X 139

  Nom_processus: AEGPUSniffer.e

  CURRENT_IRQL: 2

  Error_code: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000409 - the system detected an in this application the stack-based buffer overflow. This overrun could could allow a malicious user to take control of this application.

  EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000409 - the system detected an in this application the stack-based buffer overflow. This overrun could could allow a malicious user to take control of this application.

  EXCEPTION_CODE_STR: c0000409

  EXCEPTION_PARAMETER1: 0000000000000003

  ANALYSIS_SESSION_HOST: HP-ENVY15

  ANALYSIS_SESSION_TIME: 29/12/2015 17:10:58.0743

  ANALYSIS_VERSION: 10.0.10586.567 x86fre

  LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff8026fb4d2e9 to fffff8026fb42760

  STACK_TEXT:

  ' ffffd000 ' 24267168 fffff802' 6fb4d2e9: 00000000'00000139 00000000'00000003 ffffd000 ' 24267490 ffffd000 ' 242673e8: nt! KeBugCheckEx

  ' ffffd000 ' 24267170 fffff802' 6fb4d610: 00000000 ' fffff802 00000000 ' 6fa3272f 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000: nt! KiBugCheckDispatch + 0 x 69

  ffffd000 '242672b 0 fffff802' 6fb4c7f3: ffffe001 '7b2bf010 ffffe001' 7b2bf010 00000000 00000000' ffffe001 7 d 168270: nt! KiFastFailDispatch + 0xd0

  ffffd000 ' 24267490 fffff802' 6fb59d82: ffffc001 'f8dfe330 ffffc001' f8dfe3f0 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000: nt! KiRaiseSecurityCheckFailure + 0xf3

  ' ffffd000 ' 24267620 fffff801' 4871147 b: ffffc001 ' ffffc001 00000000 'f7a6e010 ffffc001' f7a6e100 ffffc001 ' f7a6e100: nt! : FNODOBFM: 'string' + 0x8c82

  ffffd000 ' 24267650 fffff801' 48710653: ffffc001'f7a6e010 00000000'00000000 00000000' 0000000b 00000000 00000000': dxgkrnl! DXGDEVICE::DestroyAllDeviceState + 0x1cb

  ffffd000 ' 24267690 fffff801' 486f3717: ffffc001 ' f7a6e010 ffffc001 'f8dfe330 ffffc001' f8dfe330 ffffe001 ' 7cf74080: dxgkrnl! ADAPTER_RENDER::DestroyDevice + 0xa7

  "' ffffd000 ' 242676 c 0 fffff801 ' 486f00b4: 00000000 ' 00000100 ffffc001 'f8dfe330 ffffc001' f8dfe330 fffff960 ' c5492d90: dxgkrnl! DXGPROCESS: destroy + 0x2bf

  ffffd000 ' 24267790 fffff960' c53b6c9c: 00000000' 00001cb0 fffff901'407 a 3730 00000000 '00000007 00000000' 00000000: dxgkrnl! DxgkProcessCallout + 0 x 64

  ffffd000 '242677f0 fffff960' c5035cb9: fffff901'407 has 3730 fffff901 '407-3730 ffffe001' 7b72c080 00000000 00000001': win32kbase! GdiProcessCallout + 0x8c

  ffffd000 ' 24267870 fffff960' c53d08cb: ffffd000'24267 has 48 ffffd000 242679 c 0 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000007: win32kfull! W32pProcessCallout + 0xd9

  ' ffffd000 '242678-0 fffff802' 6fdfc262: ffffd000 ' 242679 c 0 ffffe001 ' 7b3e42b0 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000: win32kbase! W32CalloutDispatch + 0x6b

  ffffd000 ' 24267910 fffff802' 6fe06ddf: ffffe001 '7b3e42b0 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000 ffffe001' 7b72c080: nt! PsInvokeWin32Callout + 0x42

  ' ffffd000 ' 24267950 fffff802' 6fe812f2: ffffe001 ' 00000007 ffffe001 '7cf74080 ffffe001' 7cf74080 ffffe001 ' 7b72c080: nt! PspExitThread + 0x49b

  ffffd000 '24267-90 fffff802' 6fb4cfa3: ffffe001 ' 7cf74080 ffffe001 '7b72c080 ffffd000' 24267b 80 ffffd000 ' 24267b 80: nt! NtTerminateProcess + 0xde

  ffffd000'24267 b 00 00007ff8'14085364: 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000: nt! KiSystemServiceCopyEnd + 0x13

  00000000' 0014fd98 00000000'00000000: 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000000: 0x00007ff8'14085364

  STACK_COMMAND: kb

  THREAD_SHA1_HASH_MOD_FUNC: a0a5514a4d87706527c6f92c37842ea8c43b81ac

  THREAD_SHA1_HASH_MOD_FUNC_OFFSET: 11718e5c925d2d833f63315284a04f89616e7880

  THREAD_SHA1_HASH_MOD: c9f3f8c71ac99eb021b386cc891dde1c61018273

  FOLLOWUP_IP:

  dxgkrnl! DXGDEVICE::DestroyAllDeviceState + 1cb

  fffff801'4871147 b 488b4b50 mov rcx, qword ptr [rbx + h 50]

  FAULT_INSTR_CODE: 504b8b48

  SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 5

  SYMBOL_NAME: dxgkrnl! DXGDEVICE::DestroyAllDeviceState + 1cb

  FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner

  MODULE_NAME: dxgkrnl

  Nom_image: dxgkrnl.sys

  DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 5632d 261

  BUCKET_ID_FUNC_OFFSET: 1cb

  FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: 0x139_3_dxgkrnl! DXGDEVICE::DestroyAllDeviceState

  BUCKET_ID: 0x139_3_dxgkrnl! DXGDEVICE::DestroyAllDeviceState

  PRIMARY_PROBLEM_CLASS: 0x139_3_dxgkrnl! DXGDEVICE::DestroyAllDeviceState

  TARGET_TIME: 2015-12 - 28 T 17: 11:09.000Z

  OSBUILD: 10586

  OSSERVICEPACK: 0

  SERVICEPACK_NUMBER: 0

  OS_REVISION: 0

  SUITE_MASK: 272

  PRODUCT_TYPE: 1

  OSPLATFORM_TYPE: x 64

  OSNAME: Windows 10

  OSEDITION: Windows 10 WinNt TerminalServer SingleUserTS

  OS_LOCALE:

  USER_LCID: 0

  OSBUILD_TIMESTAMP: 2015-11-22 17:24:24

  BUILDDATESTAMP_STR: 151121-2308

  BUILDLAB_STR: th2_release

  BUILDOSVER_STR: 10.0.10586.17.amd64fre.th2_release.151121 - 2308

  ANALYSIS_SESSION_ELAPSED_TIME: 25 c 0

  ANALYSIS_SOURCE: KM

  FAILURE_ID_HASH_STRING: km:0x139_3_dxgkrnl! dxgdevice::destroyalldevicestate

  FAILURE_ID_HASH: {070f1ec5-2412-7644-8cb9-60ac33a7233f}

  Follow-up: MachineOwner

  ---------

  I thought about it! After rolling back to the previous edition of Geforce driver the problem disappeared

• Unrecognized RAM upgrade - HP Pavilion DV9628nr

  Hello! I recently updated my old Windows Vista 32-bit, HP Pavilion DV9628nr to a configuration of SDDR 2 x 1 GB for a 1 x 1 GB, 1 x 2 GB configuration, waiting for my RAM available for increase of 2 GB to 3 GB, but that's my BIOS or my system properties seem to take account of the change (I finished analyzing memory BIOS boot successfully). I did this because as I understand it, the 32-bit Windows System I'm running can recognize only 3 to 3.5 GB of RAM upgraded anyway, while I was trying to be economic. Is there a problem when you use an old 1 GB SDDR wand in a slot and a new 2 GB of SDDR stick in the other? I reinstalled the new stick in both slots, without success. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

  Hello:

  It is either poorly labeled or screwed up somehow.

  I would certainly return it and get another.

  If the replacement does not work, try a different brand of memory, and if it does not, you have a strange problem with your PC!

  Paul

• Can I install windows7 64 bit on hp pavalion 2000 2116tu. is it a 64 bit system?

  Hello

  I would like to know if it is possible to install Windows7 64 - bit os in HP Pavalion 2000 2116tu. Is also the system's 64-bit architecture.

  Thanks in advance

  Anish

  Hi, Anish:

  Depending on the product specifications on the link below, you can install a 64-bit operating system, but I would recommend that you upgrade the memory of at least 4 GB before installing a 64-bit operating system.

  http://support.HP.com/US-en/document/c03354595=

  Your product indicates that you can install up to 8 GB of memory.

  I even think that the laptop can handle 2 x 8 GB of memory.

  Run the Analyzer memory crucial free to confirm how much memory you can upgrade to.

  http://www.crucial.com/systemscanner/

  Paul

• Windows Vista (x 86) NetIO.SYS BSOD me HELP!

  Whenever I use uTorrent to download, I get the BSOD, usually this happens when you listen to music with WMP 11.

  I am running Vista SP2 with all latest UPDATES, installed the latest drivers for my motherboard on site manufactor and latest driver for my video card.

  Here is a dump to analyze MEMORY. DMP (300MB): http://pastebin.com/mjviD3uu

  analyze of mini dump bucket: http://pastebin.com/in5HuLaN

  I formatted my PC and reinstalled Vista Home Premium and happens again, OMG!

  I changed my BIOS settings for optimized def and again! even on Ultimate SP2 happens, OMG!.

  WHAT TO DO! ? It always happens even if I leave my PC alone for a few minutes! OMG!

  Download all 3 sites:
  http://www.speedyshare.com/files/21380459/dumps.rar

  Hello

  1. don't you see 0x000000D1 on BSOD error code? If not, what is the error code?
  2. using a single processor or a computer equipped with multi processors?

  This occurs usually after a driver for a third-party network adapter is installed. NETIO.sys is a driver file.

  We recommend that you uninstall the driver of network adapter in the Device Manager and allow Windows to install a generic driver. To do this, follow these steps.
  1. click on start, type devmgmt.msc, then right-click on devmgmt and click Run as administrator.
  2. from the list of objects, expand network adapters.
  3. right click on the sub elements and click on uninstall.
  4 restart the computer for changes to take effect.
  5. once the computer is restarted, windows will load the generic driver.

  Make sure that your computer is up-to-date.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards
  Syed
  Answers from Microsoft supports the engineer.
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• How to analyze the dump memory to a server file

  I had a problem on Windows Server 2008 R2.  A few weeks ago server was shut down unexpectedly, and he created the dump file to crash on a server (memory dump). The file size would be more than 3 GB. Please help me on this issue.

  Hello

  Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the Technet Forum. You can follow the link to your question:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer/

  Hope that helps.

• AVG says using too much memory because multiple firefox is open, but I only see one.

  AVG regularly analyzes in the background. Lately he has demonstrated a popup window that says multiple applications of Firefox are running and using too much memory, so I should close some. But I can only see 1. Tried CTRL ALT DEL to see if I could find the answer, but only showed 1 firefox, and that he used more than 28 000. So I think that AVG is correct, but does not know how to see what who or where they are. They DO NOT display in the lower menu on the main screen, so I guess they are in the background. Do not have the virus, and Firefox, regularly updates itself. What should I do to fix?

  Hi cmich80220.
  It is true, that you should only be able to run only one instance of Firefox at the same time. I searched but could not find someone else with a similar problem. If the problem comes back to Firefox running slowly, you can consult this article for troubleshooting:

  [Firefox is slow]]

  Hope that helps.

• Problem of memory on my Tecra S1

  Hello:

  My Tecra S1 has been used for more than 4 years and returned to replace one of the RAMs because of the callback activity launched by Toshiba about 3 years ago. A few days ago the OS (XP) becomes very unstable and crashed. After playing with him for a while, I realize that the RAM modules have a strange problem.

  In the past 3 years, these two Rams as well as the other very well, but for some reason they become incompatible type. A reminder of Toshiba activity is 256 MB DDR333, and the other is 512 MB DDR 266, which I've updated by myself when the laptop had just bought 4 years back. If I use one of them, no matter what slot, XP works great, but it becomes crazy and keeps sends me blue screens when I try to log into XP and keeps restarting by itself, if I put the two together. Moreover, I use Memtest86 to analyze the two Rams, and it has no error message about them.

  Anyone had a similar experience? or any suggestion will be appreciated.

  Thank you very much.

  I had a similar problem on my old laptop. The portable frisottés and a BSOD appeared from time to time.
  I replaced the modules because I thought one of them would be failures, but I was wrong a slot was faulty.

  But I don t think that your locations are memory may be faulty there is a compatibility problem between the different modules and therefore the BSOD appears.

  It might be desirable to launch Notepad with two100% similar modules

• Generate a digital waveform like memory on PXI cards

  Hello

  I'm looking for a way to send a large digital waveforms using a PXI digital signal generator. I saw DIO HS cards, but their memory is smaller than the files that I want to transfer. My understanding is that the PXI backplane bandwidth 132 MB/s. So, I shouldn't be able to stream a digital signal from the memory of the card that is slower than the CPU? For example, 50 Mbits / second (equivalent to only 6.25 MB/s)? However, I think I understand after reading their textbooks is that you cannot continuously transmitting a large waveform of the processor memory file, you must transfer the file to the memory of Council first and then transfer that out.

  Does anyone know if there is a way to have a flow of digital signal generation card an arbitrarily large directly from memory to the processor of digital signals? Or, what is the fastest card of pxi digital signal generation that does not require the storage of Council first files?

  Thank you

  Isaac

  Hello Isaac,.

  Take a look at the following area developer.

  NOR-HSDIO Stream from disk (generation) using Win32 file IO

  Note that you will not be able to take full advantage of the maximum rate of update HSDIO devices, because the data must be transferred in a bus.  Some other considerations are the width of the data as well as the HSDIO device you select, which may depend on other requirements not related to the size of file or waveform (for example the standard voltage or whether you need hardware compare).  For more information, take a look at the developer following items area.

  Data streaming of Architectures in the PXI systems
  The use of National Instruments Logic Analyzer and generator of test patterns Solution

  Advanced features of e/s high-speed digital devices White Paper Series

• "no memory to perform this operation? Help.

  Hello

  While I was running an explicit signal project, a window pops up that says "no memory to perform this operation" and "memory is full" in the power spectrum. Then he paused data collection. I wonder where I can set up the maximum memory and let express signal capture much data that I need. Thank you.

  Ningyu

  You push the limits of what can do SignalExpress.  You acquire data points about 8 million (internally, it is integrated 64MBytes, since they are arrays of doubles).  Analysis carried out additional copies of data (the originals must be kept for future use).  To do this, we need to minimize copies of data.  You have several options, in order of complexity:
  

  1. Take your data and store it in a file for later analysis.  Thanks to the acquisition of the data streaming into smaller pieces (10kS in the 100kS buffer) it would be easier to do using the SignalExpress integrated logging mechanism.  When you have finished to acquire data, analyze point by point in a different project, using the log for the entry.  This allows you to cut your use of memory by a factor of eight or more.  Note that the newspapers (which is a binary format - TDMS) can be converted to ASCII, if you wish.
  2. Your input file have specific areas of interest?  You can generate and analyze in pieces.  This isn't my first suggestion, as a power spectrum can be easily generated with segmented data (it is possible and National Instruments sells software for it, but it is not included in SignalExpress).  However, if you can live with ghosts of different power of different regions, this may be an option.  You have not included your file to generate, so I can't speculate further.  If you do so, back up your data to each piece.
  3. If you have LabVIEW, you can rewrite the project relatively easily here (the entire analysis is available as screw).  LabVIEW allows to optimize the memory at a much lower level that the Signal Express (see the tutorial Managing large data sets in LabVIEW, for example).
  The R & D department is aware of this problem of memory and strives to do better.  It is a question with many facets, so generally gets progressively improved with each release of SignalExpress.  If you would like more information, please let us know.

• FPGA an internal software error occurred. writing of memory

  Hello world

  We encounter an error during the compilation of an FPGA VI. It is probably related to our use of block FPGA memory. We have a non-timed while loop which is reading a host-target FPGA FIFO and writing in memory block (inside a Subvi called z_scan_write.vi). In another loop (this one is timed loop), there's a Subvi we called z_scan_read.vi, within which read us of the memory block.

  Does anyone have an idea what goes wrong and how to avoid this problem? Thank you very much in advance for any suspicion!

  The full error message is as follows. Note that this is for the two subVIs z_scan_write.vi and z_scan_read.vi...

  An internal software error occurred. Please contact National Instruments technical support on ni.com/support with the following information:
  nirviUIDToObject.vi
  Error getting of to the UID object reference.
  All the analyzed text:

  
  -61060
  C:\Program Files (x 86) \National Instruments\LabVIEW 2010\vi.lib\rvi\ClientSDK\Core\ErrorReporting\Private\nirviPersistentNameToProjectItemLineInfoCallback.vi
  zIntensityTuples/{29C03A58-DC8D-4BC7-BAFA-66AFAE4E42D1}/%s
  
  
  ProjItem
  
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.z_scan_write.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000021.VI
  2747
  Memory write 'memory method Node '.
  
  
  ProjItem
  
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.z_scan_read.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  194
  Reading memory "memory Node method.
  
  
  ProjItem
  
  
  
  

  
  -61060
  C:\Program Files (x 86) \National Instruments\LabVIEW 2010\vi.lib\rvi\ClientSDK\Core\ErrorReporting\Private\nirviPersistentNameToProjectItemLineInfoCallback.vi
  zIntensityTuples/{29C03A58-DC8D-4BC7-BAFA-66AFAE4E42D1}/%s
  
  
  ProjItem
  
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.z_scan_write.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000021.VI
  2747
  Memory write 'memory method Node '.
  
  
  ProjItem
  
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.z_scan_read.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  194
  Reading memory "memory Node method.
  
  
  ProjItem
  
  
  
  

  
  -61106
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  
  
  
  2
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.main.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  2803
  Subvi: ' NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI'
  
  
  
  3
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.main.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  2816
  Subvi: ' NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI'
  
  
  
  
  

  
  -61106
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  
  
  
  2
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.main.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  2803
  Subvi: ' NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI'
  
  
  
  3
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.main.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  2816
  Subvi: ' NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI'
  
  
  
  
  

  
  -61106
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  
  
  
  2
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.main.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  2803
  Subvi: ' NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI'
  
  
  
  3
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.main.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  2816
  Subvi: ' NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI'
  
  
  
  
  

  
  -61106
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  
  
  
  2
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.main.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  2803
  Subvi: ' NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI'
  
  
  
  3
  1
  
  C:\NIFPGA\compilation\FPGAWrapperAK101_PXI-7813R_main_C0C9511F\MungedForFPGA\NI. Munge.main.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI
  2816
  Subvi: ' NEITHER. Munge.generate_DAC_voltages.vi_FPGACompileCopy00000001.VI'
  
  
  
  
  

  We could solve the problem. It was actually caused by the fact that we had set some subVIs to not reentrant. Their semifinal implementation (with the option to clone preallocate) solved the problem.

• Analyze the text and identify which columns contain unpaired data

  Hello world

  I want to write an elegant solution in LabWindows-CVI to accomplish the same thing as what I implemented in LabVIEW.

  The client does not use or do not own LabVIEW.  I have to code the solution in the CVI.

  Order to simpify the explanation of what it is that I try to do, I wrote a small example in LabVIEW (see below):

  

  The code needs to parse a string to determine which data column includes unpaired.  To do this, I first removed the unwanted text on the top and bottom.  I also removed the extra space between the 2 groups of data by replacing the two separated by one to facilitate the next step.  The result string has been converted to a table 2D-string.  Only the columns you want to search for remained (total of 16 columns).  Table 2D has been transposed as the table 1 d of research searched each line, I want to look in each column.  2D table transposed in its entirety was sought of all no corresponding values, which fills a table 1 d of boolean.  I converted the table 1 d of boolean to a number to see if data 'no match' has been found.  If none have been found, the value would be zero.

  I need help to encode this in CVI.

  Thank you very much

  RayR

  Ray, aspect string makes me think that it's a memory dump, while I designed a solution that analyzes the values of the whole of the chain and operates on them, instead of working on the string itself. Take a look at the attached example which should be what you're looking for. feel free to add comments or ask for clarification on some instructions if you need.

• Wire terminal in diagram of Sub - VI Analyzer

  When I run the VI Analyzer I get the following results

  Class wired in diagram of sub-

  That terminal control 'path of the log file' does not reside on the upper level diagram.   To avoid memory copies useless, control and indicator of the terminals which are wired on the part of the connector must be placed on the top level diagram.

  This brings me to the question-

  Should the control terminals are located outside the case Error statement or between the case of the error and the case of the state machine?

  VI Analyzer is pleased that when the terminals are outside the case of the error.

  Jim

  The 'proper' method is to do like the VIAnalyzer.

  "Wrap-your-head-in-duct-tape", then read this thread.

  I HOPE students to review who would know, but I can't speak for the 'right answer '.

  Ben

• Leak memory in cRIO running RT

  I am running RT 2009 on a compact chassis of RIO.  My very basic VI causes the RIO to restart, which seems to be linked to a leak memory.  I use system monitor and you can watch the use of memory on the chassis of RIO grow very slowly.  Attached is the project and the target VI is pretty basic.  I even made the change to close the refence that opens when analyzing data, but I still have this persistent problem.

  chOff,

  The next thing I would look at, it's how you use the "allocate Array for entry Module.vi.  Based on the help of this function and this reading, I don't think you are using it correctly.  I'm sure it is planned to use this function outside the main loop.  Your vi called repeatedly in the loop.  Whenever you call, it allocates another segment of memory.