AnyConnect FireSight through ISE user

Similar Questions

• FireSight and ISE User Identity Integration

  We are eager to move from CX/PRSM has the power of fire/FireSight. I am researching feature parity.

  Today, I use the integration of CDA with ISE to passively capture the identity of the user of the 802.1 x authenticated wireless employees.

  The aim is on request, produce reports map a username to their traffic in a passive way.

  I was told by an engineer Cisco ISE has been a source of identity consumable for FireSight in the same way that LDAP is with the User Agent. Furthermore I was assured that this was the case without the permission of the PXGRID.

  I'm unable to find information proving it's true. The only thing I find is how to use ISE as an authentication method.

  I don't want to authenticate users actively. I want to just user name information of scape for reporting purposes. I read the following URL and not what I'm looking for on our current configuration.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/firesight-management-...

  I think before moving that Cisco plans to integrate these kind of multiple data sources in the user through PxGrid. Even if I would prefer CDA as it appears more stable than SFUA.

  There was some proof of concept of laboratory work has shown in Cisco Live Milan a couple of weeks.

• Is FDMEE runing through the user interface or batch process?

  In an event of jython script, how can I determine if the FDMEE process is run through the user interface or as part of a batch?

  Use the method getBatchJobDetails (BigDecimal pLoadId) API, if it returns a result set, then there a batch process, if it is not it is not.

• ASA 5525 X Anyconnect configuration with ISE 2.1

  I have a new deployment of ISE 2.1 which is used only for the management of the devices at the moment.  The intention is that it will serve as radius for authentication of our VPN server.

  5525 x is a brand new ASA runs the 9.4 code.  I want to configure VPN on the SAA strategy so that each user is assigned a DAP based on their Department.

  I already have the designation of the Department for user accounts assigned in AD through a group membership.  I don't know how to get ISE to belonging to a group at the ASA so that she can associate the user based on this correct in RAP group membership.

  I succumbed to determine how this is supposed to work.  Thanks for any help.

  @Jonathan Harrison ,

  Normally we authenticate and authorize users and then push DACL or allow connection from ISE etc. of such conditions profiles that check results Posture or parts constituting the identity of the user (such as AD or another external identity store belonging to a group).

  There are a couple of good guides to do so, including detailed examples:

  https://communities.Cisco.com/docs/doc-68158

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/Adaptive-Security-app...

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/AnyConnect-secure-mob...

  While they focus on the case of use of Posture, they can be adapted to add other uses. For example, ISE registration condition may be the result of not only a Posture check also membership in a given group or another if you make it a State.

  I do not think we can specify to the ASA to call a given font of DAP like Hostscan module cannot be used at the same time that the module ISE Posture. However, you should be able to accomplish just about everything you used to depend on the DAP with ISE Posture Module AnyConnect (assuming you have AnyConnect 4.x Apex licenses).

  If you want to stick with the ASA DAP model, you can forgo using policies and module ISE Posture and instead create an authorization profile (result) to send the ASA, a pair of RAY - V based on a correspondence (in the authorization of the ISE policy) with the ad group. He is a "Cisco-VPN-3000" A - V called "PIX7x-members-from' that can be used in ASA dynamic access policies. You can see (and all other pairs A - v supported buy ISE) here:

  https://communities.Cisco.com/docs/doc-67894

• Option of DAP for the verification of the registry for remote access VPN Anyconnect v 3.0 + users

  Hi all

  I'm trying to assign the attribute DAP users VPN (Anyconnect 3.0 +) who fulfil certain conditions of registry. When setting up political DAP, while selecting the condition of the register, it is in error as "secure desktop cisco (CSD) is not enabled, CSD should be enabled to configure the registry endpoint attribute. But as I link percevied, to check the attribute registry "scan host' which is integrated in the module anyconnect 3.0 will be charged. So why he asks me to activate the CSD? CSD is really necessary to verify the registry attribute even if we use anyconenct 3.0 +? Any pointer

  The end of the ASA must be activated and more bits based on AnyConnect.

  Notes elsewhere in the link you quoted, it is said ' host Scan automatically identifies the operating systems and service packs on any remote device establishing a clientless SSL VPN and AnyConnect Cisco client session and when the host Scan/CSD or CSD is activated on the SAA. " (emphasis added).

  FYI Cisco is to denigrate these features over time for the Posture of scanning at the ISE in conjunction with the new posture AnyConnect 4.0 module.

• AnyConnect deploy through SCCM

  We need help AnyConnect via Microsoft SCCM deployment. All the world did this and willing to share how they did it. Our AD administrator has not done this before. We deploy 4 msi files, but also a profile folder. We use the SCCM to ensure that users do not uninstall AnyConnect. We want to deploy by using the domain administrator credentials, as some users are not admins and can not install the software. In our first test with the SCCM, we got a message that it was missing a module. Software was on the computer but want to the user permission to run, but no not admin, they couldn't do it.

  Thanks for any help.

  Here is an example that I used successfully for NAM + module ISE Posture (and no tile VPN). You would of course replace your version for one I've used below:

  msiexec /package anyconnect-win-4.2.00096-pre-deploy-k9.msi /norestart /passive PRE_DEPLOY_DISABLE_VPN=1 TRANSFORMS=anyconnect_client_novpn.mst

  msiexec /package anyconnect-nam-win-4.2.00096-k9.msi /norestart /passive TRANSFORMS=nam.mst

  msiexec /package anyconnect-iseposture-win-4.2.00096-pre-deploy-k9.msi /norestart /passive TRANSFORMS=iseposture.mst

  XCopy /Y /F /C /E  "\\\\profile.xml" "c:\ProgramData\Cisco\Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client\Network Access Manager\newConfigFiles\"

• From AnyConnect VPN through an RDP Session

  Hello

  We have AnyConnect (ver. 3.1.01065) set up on our ASA5520 boxes. VPN works well from the office, but I also need the ability to establish a VPN connection through a RDP connection (i.e. I use RDP to connect to a PC that has installed AnyConnect, then try to establish a VPN connection).

  I downloaded the Cisco VPN profile editor, chaned the option to 'AllowRemoteUsers '. Then the relevant group policy profile applied. Connected PC (and not via RDP) VPN, so that it downloads the new profile and then disconnected again.

  However, I can't yet start VPN through an RDP connection. (Error is "the ability to set up VPN for remote desktop is disabled.) A VPN connection cannot be established.")

  I checked the file XML on the local PC to confirm the profile was downloaded (and is, and I do not see the option AllowRemoteUsers.)

  This has also happened with the previous AnyConnect version (3.0.xxxx).

  Local routing tables of the PC look good, and I don't see any conflicts that would cause the RDP session to drop.

  Also - if I connect the VPN, then RDP on the PC, the VPN and the RDP sessions work fine.

  Any ideas would be appreciated!

  Thank you

  Tony

  Hi Tony,.

  To do this both the ASA and the client must have the same XML profile.

  I just tested this with AC 3.1 and ASA 8.4 and it works beautifully.

  I included the XML file.

  * BTW, make sure that the profile is assigned to the appropriate group strategy.

  HTH.

  Portu.

  Please note all useful posts

• How to give different Anyconnect profiles for some users

  Hello

  I am very new to Anyconnect but managed to configure our ASA5510 with connection files 2, one with split tunneling is active and the other without.  How to configure the ASA/Anyconnect client so that most users see the connection with split tunneling profile disable but others the chance to see two connection profiles in the client?  Currently, all users the chance to see the two profiles in the client and I'm stuck at the moment to try to understand how I control what they have a chance to see the profiles of connection...  Users are authenticated on a Microsoft IAS server if what counts and the ASA is running V8.2 (1) and ASDM 6.2 (5) 53.  Thanks for any help.

  Kind regards

  Terry

  Microsoft IAS is a good piece of information. Thank you.

  So I assume you are using for Radius Authentication.

  You have 2 options:

  (1) configure the radius server IAS user mapping to a specific group by using attribute radius policy.

  Here is an example of configuration using Cisco ACS radius for your reference server:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_configuration_example09186a00808cf897.shtml

  (Sorry, can't find an example of configuration using the Microsoft IAS server, but the concept is the same)

  (2) as you run microsoft IAS, I assume you are using Active Directory? Assuming it's true, you can actually authenticate via the LDAP protocol and LDAP mapping to place the user in specific group policy.

  Here is the sample configuration for LDAP authentication:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00808c3c45.shtml

  and here is the example of mapping of LDAP attributes configuration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008089149d.shtml

  Hope a using the option.

• Can WOL while the port is configured to authenticate through ISE

  Hi all

  I tried setting up WOL

  The L3 switch configuration I have no problem in it

  Configuration of the L2 switch without configuration of ISE

  interface fa0/1

  switchport access vlan 100

  switchport mode access

  spanning tree portfast

  It works well, but after that I put the ISE configuration on the port, WOL is not working.

  so please help can I use ISE + WOL or there will be problems because of that.

  I read a custom ' authentication control direction in "which should enable ISE and WOL.

  then, which will affect on something.

  Thank you.

  Yes, that's correct. If you add the command "authentication control-direction in" on a switchport then he will allow the "Magic Packet" WoL should be sent to the unit of the end and wake him up.

  By default, a switchport configured to dot1x will only allow EAP traffic initially to the switchport (thereby breaking WoL) you don't need to add the command "authentication control-direction in" to allow WoL functionality to continue working while ensuring that the endpoint can still only send EAP frames to the switchport prior authentication of 802. 1 x.

• The ISE - user not found internal user authentication failed

  Salvation of the Forumers

  I try to make wireless 802. 1 x, where the identity store using the internal users.

  But I got this error message when I try to connect

  Authentication failed                                                                                 :

  22056 object was not found in the identity of the point of sale

  My authrorization rules is built like that

  identity groups = user identity group / "mygroup".

  condition = no setting

  Permissions = standard / PermitAccess

  Question 1

  Any troubleshooting step to do about it?

  Question 2

  For authorization rules, what is the condition put to use internal user as the identity store?

  Thank you

  Noel

  The error is due to an authentication failure and is not a problem with authorization

  You must watch your authentication (policy-> authentications) and see what storage of identity has been authenticated against

  Moreover can do authentications Live page (monitor-> authentications) and to record failure, click the icon under details. This will give you details of the request processing and you can see what rule was accompanied in the politics of identity (matching political identity rule) and "banks chosen identity.

• Dynamic transformations (Case statements) conducted through the user interface

  Hello

  I have a vision that a lot of business logic with values coded hard and would like to re - design the view make the transformation of dynamic business logic. I would like to give an example to tell the requirement in detail with the example below.

  Example SQL view: -.

  SELECT

  A.EMP_ID,

  A.EMP_NAME,

  BOX WHEN A.STATE = 'CA' AND A.DEPT_CODE = "C123" THEN 10 '

  WHEN ELSE A.STATE = 'NJ' AND A.DEPT_CODE IN ('N111', 'N454') AND A.GRADE = 'AAA' THEN '08'

  ELSE END '00' AS TAX_RATE,

  CASE WHEN A.JOIN_DT > = '20010101' OR (A.EMP_ID IN ('E134', "E456") OR A.DEP_CDE IN ('C222', "F222")) THEN '30'

  WHEN of OTHER A.JOIN_DT < '20010101' OR A.EMP_ID IN ('J133', "K556") THEN '20'

  ELSE '10' END AS BONUS_PERCENT

  A.ADDRESS

  FROM EMP A

  WHERE A.END_DATE > = '20000101'

  AND NVL (A.DEL_FL, 'N') = ' don't

  AND EXISTS (SELECT DEPT 1 D)

  WHERE D.EMP_ID = A.EMP_ID)

  Result: -.

  
  

  I wish I had the TAX_RATE and logic BONUS_PERCENT dynamically generated fields which has a lot of statements of case and hardcode, where the USER can change the logic and its values according to rank.

  To do this, we can design a table EMP_BUS to have fields that can be modified and the transformation of the UI logic. Please share your ideas in the design of the table or the applicable...

  Thank you in advance.

  Hello

  One way is to have all the settings defined by the user that is stored in a global Table Temporay and join at this table in your point of view.  The advantage of a global temporary Table is that each session has its own set of parameters which does not interfere with the other, so you can have multiple sessions using the view at the same time, and everyone will see the results based on its own parameters.

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) for all of the tables involved and also publish outcomes from these data.
  If you ask on a DML statement, such as UPDATE, the sample data will be the content of the or the tables before the DML, and the results will be the State of the or the tables changed when it's all over.
  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).

  See the FAQ forum: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002

• ISE - Anyconnect wireless

  Hello! We have a doutb concerning our ISE installation. We have created a new SSID with validation EAP Chaninng (user + validation machine using the Anyconnect client) through ISE and the posture of the NAC.

  The problem is that when a user has never connected to a PC and trying to connect for the first time through this wireless, does not work. The facts are like this:

  -L' user introduced user/pass for the first time to the computer

  -Computer must contact AD to download profile

  -Computer associates with the network

  -ISE puts the user 'pending' until it is compatible NAC

  -Computer launches never process the NAC, it is never

  -ISE does not give access to the network

  -Cannot connect to the computer user.

  This happens only the first time a user attempts to access the network, because you need to download the profile, if the user has connected previously, this isn't a problem. Do you think that there is no solution for this problem?

  Use EAP with EAP-FAST v2 chaining. During the authentication attempt, the supplicant provides credentials for the machine (ISE) authentication server and the user on each attempt to auth.  Supported by the Cisco AnyConnect 3.1/supplicant client. In ISE to allow its support (policy-policy-> results >-> authentication-> protocols allowed-> default access to the network-> enable EAP-FAST).

• The band multiple @domaine used in user name on the integration of commercials with Cisco ISE?

  Hello

  How to remove multiple domain suffixes through ISE with AD user name used as an external identity Source. Username is used in [email protected] / * / format.

  Cisco ISE 1.2 patch introduced 4 Strip prefix or suffix @domaine Kingdom of the username through ISE with AD used as external identity Source. But the documentation is not updated for this feature. I am able to band 1 domain successfully suffix but following conditions listed in the list of suffixes fails to get stripped.

  Any thoughts on the same.

  Thanks Kumar

  In the ISE under Administration > identity management > external identity Sources

  Choose the Active Directory on the left, select your ad server and Advanced settings

  Under identity band of suffix, make sure prefixes band below: is selected (I know, it says prefix).

  In the list of Suffixes box, enter your list of domain suffixes to undress.  The separator character is a comma (,).

  

  If this does not solve your problem, then I fear that a call to TAC may be in order.

  UPDATE *.

  Spaces are significant characters.  The registration of domains, so as such:

  @domain.com, @domain.local, @testdomain.com

  END UPDATE *.

  Please rate useful messages and mark this question as answered if, in fact, does that answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post additional questions.

  Charles Moreton

  Post edited by: Charles Moreton

• Static IP for AnyConnect user LDAP/RADIUS

  Hello.

  We have the situation, we have built a RAS AnyConnect solution for many users on LDAP or RADIUS - we can choose what we like.

  We now have the problem that some users (round about 1,000) the same must address static ip on a swimming pool all the time, so they can get through the firewall behind the RAS connection.

  I do not have fould a possibility to add a static IP address via DAP values or attributes RADIUS and LDAP.

  A solution, anyone knows how we can assign a static ip address to our RAS users? No experience?

  Hi Marco,.

  on the Radius Server, configure the box-IP-address (attribute IETF 8) for each user, with the ip address as the value.

  HTH

  Herbert

• Cisco ISE 1.1.2.145 Admin authentication via the LDAP protocol

  I have configured the LDAP protocol and able to retrieve our LDAP directory structure. Now, I'm trying to point authentication "Admin Access" Source 'External identity', which is the new LDAP IS I created. But I couldn't find an option to authenticate locally if for some reason the LDAP configuration does not work. I learned that the ISE can automatically return to local auth as external sources Idenitity are inaccessible. How can I test the LDAP authentication with breaking them our Admin Access? I thought to open two parallel sessions, one with Super Admin account Local and one with the domain account. But I noticed that ISE communication is smart enough for the closing session/connection no matter what other sessions in different browsers so, basically, I can't open two parallel sessions the same machine to test. Suggestions? or am I missing something here?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hi Srinivas,

  Even if you configure LDAP as a source of external identity of admin access, you can always internal relief without having locked. According to the ISE user guide:

  During the operation, Cisco ISE is designed to "fall back" and try to perform the internal identity database authentication, if the communication with the external identity store has not been established, or if it fails. In addition, whenever an administrator for which you have configured external authentication launches a browser and initiates a logon session, the administrator must still the option authentication of demand through the local Cisco ISE database by choosing 'Internal' to the Selector drop-down storage of identity in the Connect dialog box.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/user_guide/ise_man_identities.html#wp1351543

  Please see the attached screenshot by my lab ISE:

  

  I configured the admin authentication against AD, but I still see both 'Internal' and 'AD' at the time of the connection.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you

  Aastha