App approval process terrible/broken?

Similar Questions

• Versions app playBook and approval process problem.

  Hello

  my app (http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/32722?lang=en) has been approved and submitted to App World March 22, version 1.1.
  After this new 0.9.4 SDK came out with permissions function.
  My application uses the file system, so I simply complied with this new SDK and added to the review (version 1.2).
  But right now it's still under discussion with the status "waiting for Test House"(plus d'un mois déjà). "»
  PlayBook users now download app v1.1 of App World and it turns out that the app does not work on devices, because of the old SDK.
  So, should I remove my App World app or just wait for the approval of the v1.2?

  Hi bvb_infinity,

  If the application does not work, it may be a good idea to take it down while the new version is in the approval process, but more than a month waiting on a new version is not normal.

  I checked the State of it and push it along.  It will take a few hours to be propagated in the App World, but in the next day or users should start to download 1.2 or get update notifications (if they download 1.1).

• retail in-app purchases and the apple approval process

  Hi, I would like to clarify and discuss a workflow for the presentation of the folios of the retail and apple application approval process. When you submit in-app for download purchase at retail how to let team demonstration/test purchase app from apple? Since the in-app purchase is not yet approved and I publish in the public Manager of folio + purchase, it will not be displayed in library view. Apple first approve/activate the ID of the product before the test? How apple examines this folio at retail?

  Apple first approve/activate the ID of the product before the test?

  Yes, it is recommended to present an in-app purchase with a demo of screenshot of the question in advance. Apple customers in-app purchases based on metadata and the screenshot. Most of the publishers get a lot of in-app purchases pre-approved to avoid problems closer to the date of publication.

• Dangerous change in the approval process for iBooks

  you remember long time for approval of new iBooks users author books that publish their books on the iBook Store since the beginning. Originally, it was WEEKS, sometimes even months to get through the approval process. Fortunately, which improved considerably over time and now it's down to a period of 24 hours. remove your book from the store.

  I have published more than 17 books so far since the beginning of the iBook Store, and certainly, I look forward to this improvement. However, I just found out the hard way that this improvement comes with a terrible price.

  The new procedure:

  Is the approval process faster (not only) not due to more staff to go through the comments. Instead, it is due to an approval procedure has changed as it has been explained to me by the customer support. Now, the examiner spends less time going through the books to get quickly to the store. I don't know the details, but I guess they check the side more art if works and not actually reading it Word by Word.

  With this first less carefully past obviously comes a new stage. The Department for approval now takes books later (perhaps if they have more time or something) and check for any errors and delivers a ticket while your book is already on the iBook Store. In fact, at that time, that is not on the iBook Store more and this is the great potential disaster you should be aware of. If you get a ticket issued, your book get ripped the store until you propose changes and he crossed successfully a new review process, which could take days. It's wrong, really wrong, and he just happened to two of my books.

  Out of the blue, I got a ticket of the iBooks team for my book 'Logic Pro X - how it works', which lies on the line store since 2013 has been updated (and approved) last September. On one page, I had misspelled the name of "iBook" Store instead of "iBooks Store" and on another page, I got a link to the page of my book by asking readers to write a comment Amazon if they like my book. Of course, it was also a no-no (a multi-billionaire company referring to a competitor of billions of dollars with a link).

  I made the changes immediately and has the new version uploaded in an hour. But the review process took over 2 days, after I contacted support and recovery from the case. And here's the reason:

  At the moment they have issued the ticket, my book was not available on the iBook Store more, nothing, not even a mention that it is "temporarily unavailable" like Amazon. The visitors couldn't find the book, all the links from my Web site, twitter, facebook and other sites related, everything was made immediately a dead link. Not only did I lose money, I had to deal with customer e-mails explaining why they could not find the announced book. Last week, it happened with another book when I was in town for a week and had no files with me. And even once, it took 3 days to review the correction that I added 's' to the iBook Store.

  It is mind-boggling that the Team did iBook ' t think that through

  Why not keep the booking online during the update

  Why not give priority to the presentation (check two typos took longer than the initial review of the book).

  I asked the support team to issue feedback on this subject, so they can correct this procedure. In the meantime, you better watch for potential new tickets, or someone had the same problem already?

  HI Edgar,

  It's really good to know. Thank you

  Difficult to have a work around for this.

  (Got a ticket) Right now, I'm waiting for approval,

  After correcting a few minor problems.

  I hope this will get fixed soon.

  I like your idea to keep the original "approved."

  live version, until the update is approved.

  Should be a simple and logical

  changes to the procedure.

  Kind regards... Thomas

• Approval process playBook (Initial submittal vs) tracking of versions

  If it was weird.  I had downloaded v1.0.0 of a game of mine in the approval process.  Now a few days after I patched it and uploaded a second version to v1.0.1.  Of course, the first version had not approved yet because it was only a few days.  Now I would have assumed that the examiners would reazlied with output a v1.0.0 and v1.0.1 in my queue that they should have only watched v1.0.1 (latest!)

  They don't do well.  They have reviewed and approved v1.0.0 for sale and v1.0.1 is still being investigated.  How is it comes to the process?  Why review and approve what has obviously been patched with an update?  Now, I don't want to approve the app for sale until the follow-up is considered.

  Should I have deleted the v1.0.0?  Should I have resubmitted a cool application?  What all do you when this process seems backward and useless?

  Hi HybridMind,

  I don't know why the examiner may have missed v1.0.1 but I have run it through a review and has approved.

  We apologize for the confusion.

• App approval time

  Hello world

  I wonder what people know in what concerns app approval times.  I introduced a native application of the PlayBook on 14 December and it has not been approved yet (he has no control of the special export or to one of these types of complications).  Recognizing, of course, the holiday season and also the rise to the BB10 launch impact of approval for applications PlayBook times.  But I think 2 weeks and counting seems to be a bit long (especially for the devs having to spend several months in the development of a native app and want to release to the market :-))

  I was wondering if it's just me experience this purgatory of long time waiting :-)

  Direct link to email based on the forms of support of the seller:

  https://www.BlackBerry.com/profile/?EventID=8109

  To access this page through the supplier portal:

  Sign in to your account on the supplier portal and click on 'Help' in the left navigation column.

  This will bring you to https://developer.blackberry.com/devzone/appworld/

  and from there scroll down to the section that says "the vendor management features.

  and click on the button "Get a Vendor Management Support".

• Is it possible to easily view the status of the approval process for a specific campaigns without having to open it?

  Hello

  Is it possible to easily view the status of the approval process for a specific campaign without having to open it?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Yes. Campaigns launch area, select open an existing campaign.

  Thank you

  edynamic expert Eloqua

• Questions about the approval process

  I'm currently waiting on my plug-in to be approved and it has been about 2 days... to better manage my own and our customers expectations on updates of the extension that we have done, I have a few questions:

  • I have been informed that approval takes up to 2 weeks. Is it possible to speed up the process?
  • Is there a way to see the status of your approval beyond "submitted changes?
  • After approval, the addition of extension patches also require an approval process?
  • After approval, updates like text descriptions or image updates require an approval process?

  Thank you for your time and consideration, any help is appreciated.

  (1) maybe if you write an email to [email protected]

  (2) no

  (3) Yes

  (4) Yes

• Planning approval processes in 11.1.2.2 - 'approved' to 'not started '.

  
  Hello

  We are on the planning of the 11.1.2.2.Last year, we used a unit planning with "Custom" hierarchy to activate approvals and "Free-form" model options Now the planning unit is in status 'approved' as budget process is completed last year. We plan to launch our budget next year.

  How can I change the status of the workflow to "not started".

  Please suggest

  Thank you

  You will use the same planning units and the same approval process, used to you? all you need to do is start again.

  Don't forget: once an administrator excludes a unit planning, all annotations and history associated with the planning unit are ignored. Status of the planning unit is returned to not started and the owner is set to non-owner. However, the data values are kept. The stored data will include retail support.

  See you soon... !!

  Rahul S.

• Error in the approval process

  Hi all
  
  I am a new bie to OIM 11 g. I developed a custom (single level parallel) composite approval and it works very well.
  According to my new condition, I need to add two blocks of approval set before the parallel approval block. Throughout the approval process contains 3 levels of approval with the third level as a parallel approval block.
  
  Level 1 approval will be a default approval and by default, all requests must be routed to this level.
  Based on a condition (create/edit/delete user), the request must be routed to the 2nd and 3rd level approval.
  
  In one scenario (condition), requests are routed to 1st, 2nd, 3rd level. In another scenario, requests are routed to approval level 1st and 3rd. In the two scenarios above, the request is completed successfully.
  
  In the last scenario (where lack of condition for the 2nd and 3rd level) the request is only forwarded the approval level 1 and not the other two levels. In this scenario, I get the following error, and demand is a failure.
  
  WLSPropertyUtils:getOperationName, the operation name is null
  Invalid result COMPLETED received the SOA for the id of the request 3058.
  [CALLBACKMSG] Plugin to change internal State for request 3058 and the status is: query failed.
  [CALLBACKMSG] Inside the plugin for adjustment of status to request 3058, target tye is resource and the operation is MODIFYRESOURCE.
  [CALLBACKMSG] Inside the plugin for adjustment of status to request 3058, target tye is resource and the operation is MODIFYRESOURCE.
  An attempt was made to search for unversioned
  resources global 'tail' of a version of the application "IOM [Version 11.1.1.3.0 =] '. This can potentially lead to conflict the uses of the global resource between multiple versions of the application.
  WLSPropertyUtils:getOperationName, the operation name is null
  
  Let me know if I am wrong anywhere or please suggest what to do to solve this problem.
  
  Thanks in advance for the help.
  
  Thank you
  PT

  Below you will find the link
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/request.htm#BABJGIFJ
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/request.htm#BABFIAIH

  check the mapping of "task results is REJECTING" and "results of the task is APPROVED.

• Object is not be displayed during the approval process

  Hello
  
  The purpose of my custom connector shape is not get displayed in the IOM 10 g approval process. We have upgraded to patch BP19. Previously, Im doubting if it occurred after the upgradation of patch and work... Can anyone please share your suggestions?
  
  Thank you

  Try below

  1. Please provide all permissions as insert, update and delete for role in object permissions (hopefully you did)
  2. just to check Add your role or all USERS tab

  3. check in the resource object 'itself demand allowed'

  Kind regards
  Nayan

• Q: integrate the approval process

  Hi all
  
  I'm looking for some information with an approval process for a resource regarding.
  
  I m having resources, called 'X '. I want to integrate an approval process when users are created through manual processes and for the same resource users should get created automatically via GTC flat file.
  
  
  Please guide me on how to make this implementation.
  
  
  Kind regards
  877247

  Access policy: used for the supply of users in the target Application when they enter the IOM after reconciliation.

  You can create two cgroups employee and contractor
  Create the rule of membership for both of these groups as role is used and role == contractor

  Create two access with and without the approval policies and attach it to the corresponding group.

  Second case:

  Create an approval workflow
  Add a task (UNCONDITIONAL), connect your adapter that will check the type of user as employee or Contrcator and decide whether or not you need approval.
  This task will return answers "NEED_APPROVAL" and "APPROVAL_NOTREQUIRED".

  On NEED_APPROVAL, call your other task which will be simultaneously assign a group
  On APPROVAL_NOT_REQUIRED does not call something.

• Cool - can't route to the AP approval process

  Hello
  
  I have a problem to route an expense report after the approval process a Manager (Spending). The workflow no route it to the AP approval process. The flow stop spending administrator somehow. The error said that it can not locate the supervisor (cannot locate one supervisor has approved expense report). Can you advice guys what's causing the problem. What is the configuration to maintain the employee? I didn't change anything for the workflow.
  
  Thank you for your help.

  In the workflow designer, change the access level to a lower number. You can do to help--> on the workflow Builder

  To learn more about the access levels are trying http://oracle.anilpassi.com/oracle-workflows-access-protection-concepts.html

• Approval process to disable the user

  Hello
  
  I need to have an approval process before disabling the user and the approver is not not responsible for the user. I'm not sure how to implement it. Please guide.
  
  Thank you

  You can simply create a task assignment adapter that will assign the task to a dynamic user which if present in the field OWNER UDF on this user.

  findGroups - error when getting the group list for the user of the connection

• Send Emial - approval process

  Hello
  
  I have a two IOM groups say group "Admin" and the group "group Emp. The "Admin" group is defined as the management of the 'group of Emp' group.
  
  I have an approval process, then I defined the call of the process task "Admin Group Approval". Using the assignment of this task 'Admin Group Approval' tab, the request is assigned to the "Admin" group (I used the adapter to task assignment to determine the group, 'Admin Group'.).
  
  I want to send the e-mail to the assignee (in this case, the members of the group "Admin") so I set the email and set it above the allocation rule and checked the box "Send E-mail" as well.
  
  The approval process works fire but the problem is, the mail is sent only to the administrator, but members of the group "Admin" not getting any emails.
  
  Can someone help me on this?
  
  HERE
  thirlk

  Uncheck send it an email to the task and send e-mails to the task assignment adapter itself (where you return the key to group) using tcEmailNotificationUtil API