Arithmetic overflow Tick counter with GetLastInputInfo (User32.dll)

Similar Questions

• Satellite M100-178 - user32.dll.relocated dll system memory-> HHCTRL.ocx

  Dear Sir

  I bought a new laptop in Dubai a month ago and I did no changes in the software since I bought it, except download adobe acrobat 8, the windows media player 10, the office macintoshëoperating new edition.

  Suddenly from 2 days a window message appear each time windows starts.

  The message is:

  (user32.dll.relocated system in memory because dll c:\windowws\system32\HHCTRL.ocx occupied an address reserved for windows system DLLs. seller box or fed the dll should be contacted for the new dll)

  my laptop model is a Satellite m100-178 with the serial number 76883164G.
  waiting for your response,

  Thank you

  Dr./tamer moh kotby
  dermatologist
  [email protected]

  I have the same prolem suddenly! I think that this comes from Internet Explorer and I found a copy of the HHCTRL. OCX in the net, replace it but after 1-2 restarts, the result is the same error.

• DLL from the Windows API (user32.dll) causes a fatal error

  Hello
  On installation, we using a touch screen. LabView software is running in full-screen. I need to deactivage my Panel before if the screen saver is to warn the user start anyting. I use user32.dll SystemParametersInfoA and it works well, except, if I left the software. "myexe a fin a mistake and should be closed" (something like that my XP is in french).

  I have no issues in debug mode, this error happens in exe mode.

  I use LV 8.6.1. Do you have any idea why?

  Thank you

  CFiset wrote:

  Thanks, I'll take care of the details. But unfortunly, it does not.

  uint32_t SystemParametersInfoA (uint32_t SPI, uint32_t 0, uint32_t * value, False uint32_t);

  SPI = 114 = SPI_GETSCREENSAVERRUNNING

  If * value! = 0, screen saver, ON the other scresaver OFF

  Still have the fatal error of Windows.

  Thank you

  I noticed the node having a rather odd way of user32.dll on the initial load of the library call. You happen to have copied this DLL somewhere and SEO with full path to your VI?

  It is a very big NO-NO! User32.dll and several other Windows system dll weird for the system and are all bad behavioured if you try to load another copy elsewhere on the disk as the system directory. Just rename the user32.dll library only and let Windows choose the good DLL from the system directory.

  Another problem with specifying the full path to a copy of such a DLL, it of that LabVIEW you will think that you must have this built application-specific DLL and will include it in the build. However your user32.dll is almost 200% VERY incompatible to any other Windows system there, because of the Windows Service Pack version and upgrades of the correction of a bug, as well as different versions of Windows.

  Rolf Kalbermatter

• crash application (user32.dll) report

  

  I have a request from the actor. When I use "user32.dll - keybd_event" function, application returns the exception above. I used the function "keybd_event" of the example that has been downloaded on the link below.

  https://decibel.NI.com/content/docs/doc-9001

  I am attaching the report of accident for more information. Am I doing something wrong with 'user32.dll' call or it is a bug?

  Seems I solved the problem. I made the original example application and saw that he also threw this exception. I thought I had a copy of 'user32.dll' to the data directory must cause a system error. After the removal of the copy "user32.dll", running the application correctly. But how do I prevent "application builder" to create a copy of 'user32.dll' to the data directory. I see not all parameters in this topic inside the construction specifications.

• LabVIEW 2010 crash when calling user32.dll

  Interesting LabVIEW 2010 'characteristic', I discovered this morning.

  Attached are two identical screws, a registered in 2010 and a registered in 2009.  These screws have been written specifically to demonstrate the bug, I came across this afternoon.  Each VI when it is run needs you to find a specific program (window) opened in Microsoft Windows and bring it to the foreground.  It is based on 'user32.dll' to perform this operation.  It also allows you to specify the calling convention for the function call.

  LV 2009, calling convention works without error.  However, in LV 2010 the calling convention of the function must be "stdcall (WINAPI)" and not the default value of 'C '.  If the calling convention is 'C' LabVIEW hangs and then closes without warning.

  If you happen to have LV 2009 and 2010 LV on your computer, I would like to hear if this phenomenon is duplicated so that I can identify if the bug is LV 2010 related or is more specific to my personal configuration.

  Thank you

  ~ David

  221113 Return

  COLD LAKE with the calling convention incorrect siliently crash LabVIEW can. LabVIEW 8.5 2009 could adjust the convention to call at run time if the user has selected the wrong option. In 2010, it is no longer a case. More information is located in the 59KB14WI knowledge base Workaround: Use the correct calling convention Reported Version: 2010 32-bit    Solved Version: N/A    Added the: 2010-07-23

  Release notes for 2010.

• tick count vs get time in seconds

  Hello

  I have a question about dt different then as 'number of cycles' and "get time in seconds" on a loop.

  I am attaching the picture which should describe the problem.

  Why is there a difference and what would be the best to do?

  Yves

  jyang72211 wrote:

  Number of cycles vs. get date/time in second do roughly the same thing, but if you use functions to calculate the time difference, you should be aware that tick count will finally make a loop around.

  Regarding your block digram, you have a table that are used to calculate the elapsed time for each iteration of the loop, and it will always be 150ms, because that is the job of the time – the loop to ensure that it completestobegin each loop to the exact amount of time specified, which is 150ms in your case.  However, regardless of the inside, the loop can be executed at any time during the 150ms you have allocated to the loop, i.e., you 150ms to run everything that's in the loop, but when run the code in the loop exactly is indeterminate.

  However, it seems that clock Tick would give you a pretty consistent result, 150ms.  It is possible that the execution time for the clock to tick is more consistent than the other function.

  Anecdote:

  Differnce between the counties of the tick will always be correct even when it rolls.

  Time loop determines when it starts, the code that runs in it determines when it ends.  If it was the other way around I would be snapping this code that takes 5 minutes to run in a defined time loop to traverse once per second.

  I agree with Yair you see the resolution in the timestamps of OS.

  Ben

• Repositioning of the authorized system DLL: the user32.dll system DLL has been moved in memory.

  ERROR MESSAGE

  Repositioning of the authorized system DLL: the user32.dll system DLL has been moved in memory. The application will not work correctly. The move took place as C:\WINDOWS\system32\SHELL32.dll DLL occupied an area of address reserved for Windows system DLLS. The vendor supplying the DLL should be contacted for a new DLL.

  PROBLEMS

  This error causes my Calculator do not open it, also not allowing my flash drive to date, Chrome, Nokia PC and more. There also cause Chrome, Nokia PC, Flash player and other programs do not to install. Therefore, I would like to Note that system Restore will not restore the computer.

  MY COMPUTER DESCRIPTION

  Microsoft Windows XP

  Home Edition

  Version 2002

  Service Pack 3

  QUESTION

  (1) which can caused a user32.dll / corrupt relocated in memory, dll files are missing?
  (2) the error message says move. What are the step to go to find the DLL that comes to mind? are how we go about replacing?
  (3) how do I fix this?
   
   
  DLL system. User32.dll

  Hello

  Let us first start the sfc scan and check if there are any file system corruption.
  a. to do this, click Start, click principally made programs, Accessories, right-click on command prompt and then click run as administrator. If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type the password, or click allow.
  b. type the following command and press ENTER:
  sfc/scannow
  The sfc/scannow command. analyzes all protected system files and replaces incorrect versions with appropriate Microsoft versions.

  More information on SFC scan found in this document:
  Description of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 System File Checker (Sfc.exe)
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310747

• Cannot locate component user32.dll

  OK... so... help my mother at a distance.

  Yesterday, everything was fine... Today she then turns on his Dell to this error:

  "Stop c0000135 Unable of component located. This application has failed to start because user 32. dll not found.  Reinstalling the application may fix this problem.

  I tried to boot mode safe place... the same bsod and messages

  I tried the last good known... same error message and bsod

  Can't seem to fix it... guess I need the installation cd?

  Try to get to the system restore to save one day...

  Any help would be great

  Simply replace the file... and you will have to start on something to do.

  The instructions explain how to make a bootable CD.

  You create the CD, stick it in the afflicted system and boot on the CD.  Mini XP looks like Windows, if you find a copy of the file and replace/copy in the right place, remove the CD and reboot your system with the hard drive.

  I hope that's all you need to do.

  You ar at a disadvantage if you are working remotely.  Somehow the CD you made and the afflicted system must meet physically. Maybe your mother has a close friend who can make the CD and give it, and then you can help remotely.  It would be useful that you (using your own system) also made a CD so you can see how it works and practice.

  This will be the big challenge for you in this operation.

  Then you can think of the upgrade or replacement of McAfee with something else.

  I suspect that McAfee quarantined to your way of thinking of user32.dll file he was afflicted.  Sometimes anti-malware or anti-virus software will quarantine (deletion) of the critical files on the XP system and leave your system unbootable.

  Do not guess what the problem might be - understand and resolve it. I need YOUR voice and the points for helpful answers and propose responses. I'm saving for a pony!

• User32.dll Problem__

  I am running XP Professional. I have a virus it is indicated in the file c:\windows\system32\user32.dll after trying many fixes suggested by my antivirus provider (Bullguard) they offer now use the Windows Recovery Console to replace the file user32.dll with that on my original windows CD. By following the instructions in the Microsoft 315241 support article I can rename the file user32.dll as user32.bak OK but when I try to expand/copy the file from the Windows CD, using the expand c:\windows\system32 d:\i386\user32dl_ I get an error stating that "the system does not file or the specified directory. It's as if the pc does not see the drive d: (cd), but it must be because he used to start Recovery console program. Can anyone suggest what is wrong or I'm doing something wrong? Thank you, KEVIN

  Thanks, OK Mike. Moreover, for some reason any Microsoft wouldn't let me in so I had to ask a new password that doesn't let me use my original username (where the slight modification). Interestingly, I had tried directly access to the D drive (Yes the CD drive is D) the RC, but it wouldn't let me change for her (all very strange), I could work only of in the C drive - I don't understand that everything as the D drive must have worked it was where I ran RC of!)

  Anyway, I solved the problem in a different way. I found the file in the folder cache dll in system 32 and after you rename the .bak version suspicious, I copied the version of dll cache intot the System 32 and then deleted the rrenamed one folder. This seems to have done the trick and a virus scan has now no current infection.

  Thanks for your help.  KEVIN

• The procedure entry point DwmHintDxUpdate be found in USER32.dll dynamic link library.

  I have a Win 7 Ultimate machine.  I get the error message
  The procedure entry point DwmHintDxUpdate be found in USER32.dll dynamic link library.
  What it means?  Is he serious? How can I get rid of him?
  Thank you
  Chas

  The top of the box, said Aurora.src.  This is the screensaver provided by Microsoft.  The DEFAULT screensaver supplied with Windows 7 is not compatible with Windows 7 64 bit, causes a message box and often freezes the system for a few minutes.  Is not on the beta version.
  Certainly picked a different screen saver seems to fix the problem.

• How to write data in mode intertwined with TDMS C DLL 2.0?

  Hello

  How to write data in mode intertwined with TDMS C DLL 2.0?

  I use DAQmx features in Visual Studio C++ without Measurment Studio.

  This function returns the data in interlaced mode.

  How can I configure the functions of DLL C TDMS to store this data in the tdms files?

  I see that it is not possible with the PDM version 2.0 with 1.0.

  Thank you

  -TDM C Dll is not able to do

  -TDM header writer may be usable for this but is not able to be used for tdms files.

• How to generate a single Point (On-Demand) edge counting with relaxing break

  I have problem when creating a Labview program to generate a single Point (On-Demand) edge counting with relaxing break illustrated in FIGURE 1 below. I only know how to build counter edge without relaxing break and my program is illustrated in FIG. 2 and gaskets also. Should what changes I make on my program? The DAQ card that I use is 6259 PCI/USB.

  

  FIG1. Single edge counting with break Point (on request)

  

  Fig.2 my program to generate the edge without relaxing break

  It is resolved

• Using a counter with FiniteSamps and one with ContSamps

  I am using 2 counters on the NI USB-6229 (or USB-6259), case where a counter is implemented for FiniteSamps and another for ContSamps. I have the following MeasurementStudio code:

  ErrChk DAQmxCreateCOPulseChanTicks(hCnt0, "Dev1/ctr0", "", "20MHzTimebase", DAQmx_Val_Low, 0, 400, 400);
  ErrChk DAQmxCfgImplicitTiming(hCnt0, DAQmx_Val_FiniteSamps, 100);

  ErrChk DAQmxStartTask (hCnt0);

  ErrChk DAQmxCreateCOPulseChanTicks(hCnt1, "Dev1/ctr1", "", "20MHzTimebase", DAQmx_Val_Low, 0, 400, 400);

  ErrChk DAQmxCfgImplicitTiming(hCnt1, DAQmx_Val_ContSamps, 2);

  ErrChk DAQmxStartTask (hCnt1);

  When I run it, I get an error-50103 "the resource specified is reserved". If I change the FiniteSamps to ContSamps on the first counter, everything works fine.

  If I use only one counter with FiniteSamps, everything works very well.

  Is this a bug in DAQmx or the use of double counter on M Series devices is limited to ContSamps?

  VIC

  Hey Vic,

  It is actually planned on a device of the M series.  Here's a time diagram of the M Series user manual which might make this a little clearer:

  

  The device uses actually one counter for the other door so the result is a generation of finite pulse.  If you can provide the door from another source, you can configure a generation of continuous pulses on two counters and their door (DAQmx calls it a "relaxing break") of this external signal.

  You can also look at the use of the digital I/o correlated to generate impulses over multiple (up to 32 lines on your 6229 and 6259).  You could use one of the counters to generate a time base for digital lines and build the waveform as a result.

  One thing to note is that our new X series cards can generate a generation of impulses finished on a "single" counter (it was actually a paired internal counter that allows this).  There are four accessible counters by the user on the X series devices, which means you could generate four pulse trains finished.

  Best regards

  John

• GetGuiResources handle question User32.dll

  Hello

  I need help for my LabVIEW 2009 vi. I'm basically trying to get the number of GDI objects for a process, the same newspaper for some time (something like the Windows Task Manager - but I intend to use LabVIEW for this as a learning experience)

  I have a vi prototype that gets the ID of a process name process (say, notepad.exe), gets a handle for this ID and calls user32.dll [GetGuiResources] method to get the number of GDI objects. When I use C# for the programming, I am able to get the number of GDI, but when I followed the same steps in LabVIEW, I get the same. I narrowed the problem to the last step where the "handle" is passed to user32.dll. I don't know what Iam doing wrong in vi. Calling the method also seems fine - no error is reported. I'm I doing something wrong when using type cast step?

  Steps to reproduce the problem: launch the application Notepad and file performance c# or LabVIEW vi. Observe that we do not get the GDI County in case of LabVIEW.

  Please suggest me a solution. I have attached the code c# and LabVIEW vi for reference.

  Well, I really doubt that the .net object handle is directly handle Windows value itself. It is rather a refnum of LabVIEW encapsulating the actual object which may or may not be the handle itself. So you cannot just that cataloged and hope for Windows to recognize as valid a process handle.

  Instead, you must treat them as object and execute a method on it to convert its value internal in a LabVIEW data type such years Int64. ;-)

  And btw. your VI repeatedly running causes a big memory leak. You must close each object refnum properly in order not to have LabVIEW and .net continue to create objects that are still lingering around until you close your LabVIEW application.

  .NET is a removal of automatic object that marks all objects whose last variable referencing is out of reach for the deletion program flow. Should therefore no obj.dispose () or a similar method. LabVIEW manages only a little different for different reasons and deletions only objects automatically, when the VI of highest level in the hierarchy was created an object refnum going inactive.

  

• Where can I find the User32.dll header files?

  Hello

  Is it possible to get the header file and a file of the User32.dll library or if I want to use a function by a User32.dll where can I get the parameters and arguments for this function that is required to call.

  Thank you & best regards

  Samuel J

  System engineer

  CAPTRONIC systems

  [email protected]

  Hello

  In general you don't need 'user32.h' because the functions declared in Winuser.h (you must include Windows.h).

  Otherwise, if you need user32.h only, you can get this file as well as debugging tools

  After installation, you will get this file in C:\Program Files\Debugging Tools for Windows\winext\manifest\user32.h

  Kind regards

  Andrey.