ASA 5505 - I can't create an IPSEC VPN between two ASA 5505
Hello
I have two ASA 5505 with basic license and I'm trying to create a VPN IPSEC using the CLI. Here are the steps I did:
1 Configure ASA-1 (host name, vlan 1 and vlan 2).
2. configure a static route
3. create object network (local and remote)
4. create the access list
5. create ikev1 crypto
6. create tunnel-group
7 Configure nat
and I repeat the steps above with the ASA but another change IP.
Are to correct the above steps?
Why can I not create an IPSEC VPN between devices?.
No, you needn't. The ASA configuration is ok. Packet trace proved it. I think it can be a problem on the hosts. Please, check the firewall on the PC and try to put out of service, if it is running.
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
IPsec VPN between two routers - mode ESP Transport and Tunnel mode
Hi experts,
I have this question about the Transport mode and Tunnel mode for awhile.
Based on my understanding of 'Transport' mode is not possible because you always original "internal" private in the IP headers or IP addresses. They are always different as public IP on interfaces enabled with Crypto Card addresses. When encapsulated in the VPN tunnel, the internal IP addresses must be included or the remote VPN router won't know where to forward the packet.
To test, I built a simple GNS3 with three routers laboratory. R1 and R3 are configured as VPN routers and the R2 must simulate Internet.
My configs are also very basic. The R2 is routing between 1.1.1.0/24 and 2.2.2.0/24. It is defined as the gateway of R1 and R3.
R1:
crypto ISAKMP policy 100
BA aes
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key 123456 address 2.2.2.2
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP_null null esp esp-sha-hmac
!
10 map ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined peer 2.2.2.2
transformation-ESP_null game
match address VPN!
list of IP - VPN access scope
ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
!R3:
crypto ISAKMP policy 100
BA aes
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key 123456 address 1.1.1.2
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP_null null esp esp-sha-hmac
!
10 map ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined peer 1.1.1.2
transformation-ESP_null game
match address VPN!
list of IP - VPN access scope
Licensing ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255I configured transform-"null" value, while it will not encrypt the traffic.
Then I tried the two 'transport' mode and mode "tunnel". I ping a host in the internal network of the R1 to another host in the internal network of the R3. I also tried 'telnet'. I also captured packets and carefully compared in both modes.
Packets encapsulated in exactly the same way!
It's just SPI + sequence No. +
+ padding I will attach my screenshots here for you guys to analyze it. I would be grateful for any explanation. I confused maybe just when it comes to the NAT...
I guess my next step is to check if the two modes to make the difference when the GRE is used.
Thank you
Difan
Hi Difan,
As you point out the mode of transport is not always applicable (i.e. applicable if IP source and destination is equal to corresnpoding proxy IDs).
A typical scenario in this mode of transport is used:
-Encryption between two hosts
-GRE tunnels
-L2TP over IPsec
Even if you set "transport mode" this does not mean that it will be used. IOS routers and I blieve also ASA will perform backup even if the mode of transport is configured but does not apply in tunnel mode.
I can take a look at your traces to sniff, but all first can you please check if you transport mode on your ipsec security associations? "See the crypto ipsec his" exit you will show the tunnel or transport mode.
HTH,
Marcin
-
Configure several IPSec VPN between Cisco routers
I would like to create multiple ipsec VPN between 3 routers. Before applying it, I would like to check on the config I wrote to see if it works. It's just on RouterA configuration for virtual private networks to RouterB, and RouterC.
As you can apply in a cyptomap by interface, I say with the roadmap, that it should be able to manage traffic for both routers. Or is there a better way to do it?
RouterA - 1.1.1.1
RouterB - 2.2.2.2
RouterC - 3.3.3.3
RouterA
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key RouterB address 2.2.2.2
ISAKMP crypto keys RouterC address 3.3.3.3
invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP
ISAKMP crypto keepalive 5 10 periodicals
ISAKMP crypto nat keepalive 30
!
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set AES - SHA esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac
!
outsidemap 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined peer 2.2.2.2
game of transformation-AES-SHA
match address 222
outsidemap 30 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined peer 3.3.3.3
game of transformation-AES-SHA
match address 333
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
Description * Internet *.
NAT outside IP
outsidemap card crypto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
Description * LAN *.
IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
IP nat inside
!
IP nat inside source map route RouterA interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
!
access-list 222 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 223 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 223 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 333 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 334 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 334 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
!
!
RouterA route map permit 10
corresponds to the IP 223 334
Hi Chris,
The two will remain active.
The configuration you have is for several ste VPN site is not for the redundant VPN.
The config for the redundant VPN is completely different allows so don't confuse is not with it.
In the redundant VPN configuration both peers are defined in the same card encryption.
Traffic that should be passed through the tunnel still depend on the access list, we call in the card encryption.
This access-lsist is firstly cheked and as a result, the traffic is passed through the correct tunnel
HTH!
Concerning
Regnier
Please note all useful posts
-
Problem with IPsec VPN between ASA and router Cisco - ping is not response
Hello
I don't know because the IPsec VPN does not work. This is my setup (IPsec VPN between ASA and R2):
my network topology data:
LAN 1 connect ASA - 1 (inside the LAN)
PC - 10.0.1.3 255.255.255.0 10.0.1.1
ASA - GigabitEthernet 1: 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ASA - 1 Connect (LAN outide) R1
ASA - GigabitEthernet 0: 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.252
R1 - FastEthernet 0/0: 172.30.1.1 255.255.255.252
---------------------------------------------------------------------
R1 R2 to connect
R1 - FastEthernet 0/1: 172.30.2.1 255.255.255.252
R2 - FastEthernet 0/1: 172.30.2.2 255.255.255.252
R2 for lan connection 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------
R2 to connect LAN2
R2 - FastEthernet 0/0: 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
PC - 10.0.2.3 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.1
ASA configuration:
1 GigabitEthernet interface
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
no downtime
interface GigabitEthernet 0
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.252
no downtime
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.30.1.1------------------------------------------------------------
access-list scope LAN1 to LAN2 ip 10.0.1.0 allow 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0
object obj LAN
subnet 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0
object obj remote network
10.0.2.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
NAT (inside, outside) 1 static source obj-local obj-local destination obj-remote control remote obj non-proxy-arp static-----------------------------------------------------------
IKEv1 crypto policy 10
preshared authentication
aes encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 3600
Crypto ikev1 allow outside
crypto isakmp identity address------------------------------------------------------------
tunnel-group 172.30.2.2 type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group 172.30.2.2 ipsec-attributes
IKEv1 pre-shared-key cisco123
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-192 ASA1TS, esp-sha-hmac ikev1-------------------------------------------------------------
card crypto ASA1VPN 10 is the LAN1 to LAN2 address
card crypto ASA1VPN 10 set peer 172.30.2.2
card crypto ASA1VPN 10 set transform-set ASA1TS ikev1
card crypto ASA1VPN set 10 security-association life seconds 3600
ASA1VPN interface card crypto outsideR2 configuration:
interface fastEthernet 0/0
IP 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
no downtime
interface fastEthernet 0/1
IP 172.30.2.2 255.255.255.252
no downtime-----------------------------------------------------
router RIP
version 2
Network 10.0.2.0
network 172.30.2.0------------------------------------------------------
access-list 102 permit ahp 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2
access-list 102 permit esp 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2
access-list 102 permit udp host 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2 eq isakmp
interface fastEthernet 0/1
IP access-group 102 to------------------------------------------------------
crypto ISAKMP policy 110
preshared authentication
aes encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 42300------------------------------------------------------
ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 172.30.1.2-----------------------------------------------------
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 128 R2TS------------------------------------------------------
access-list 101 permit tcp 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255
------------------------------------------------------
R2VPN 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
match address 101
defined by peer 172.30.1.2
PFS Group1 Set
R2TS transformation game
86400 seconds, life of security association set
interface fastEthernet 0/1
card crypto R2VPNI don't know what the problem
Thank you
If the RIP is not absolutely necessary for you, try adding the default route to R2:
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.2.1
If you want to use RIP much, add permissions ACL 102:
access-list 102 permit udp any any eq 520
-
Public static IPsec tunnel between two routers cisco [VRF aware]
Hi all
I am trying to configure static IPsec tunnel between two routers. Router R1 has [no VRF] only global routing table.
Router R2 has two routing tables:
* vrf INET - used for internet connectivity
* global routing table - used for VPN connections
Here are the basic configs:
R1
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key 7V7u841k2D3Q7v98d6Y4z0zF address 203.0.0.3
invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac TRSET_AES-256_SHA
transport mode
!
Crypto ipsec TUNNEL-IPSEC-PROTECTION profile
game of transformation-TRSET_AES-256_SHA
!
interface Loopback0
10.0.1.1 IP address 255.255.255.255
IP ospf 1 zone 0
!
interface Tunnel0
IP 192.168.255.34 255.255.255.252
IP ospf 1 zone 0
source of tunnel FastEthernet0/0
tunnel destination 203.0.0.3
ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
Ipsec TUNNEL-IPSEC-PROTEC protection tunnel profile
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
IP 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.0!
IP route 203.0.0.3 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/0 102.0.0.2
#######################################################
R2
IP vrf INET
RD 1:1
!
Keyring cryptographic test vrf INET
address of pre-shared-key 102.0.0.1 key 7V7u841k2D3Q7v98d6Y4z0zF
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP
crypto isakmp profile test
door-key test
function identity address 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac TRSET_AES-256_SHA
transport mode
!
Crypto ipsec TUNNEL-IPSEC-PROTECTION profile
game of transformation-TRSET_AES-256_SHA
Test Set isakmp-profile
!
interface Loopback0
IP 10.0.2.2 255.255.255.255
IP ospf 1 zone 0
!
interface Tunnel0
IP 192.168.255.33 255.255.255.252
IP ospf 1 zone 0
source of tunnel FastEthernet0/0
tunnel destination 102.0.0.1
ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
tunnel vrf INET
Ipsec TUNNEL-IPSEC-PROTEC protection tunnel profile
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
IP vrf forwarding INET
IP 203.0.0.3 255.255.255.0!
IP route 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/0 203.0.0.2
#######################################################
There is a router between R1 and R2, it is used only for connectivity:
interface FastEthernet0/0
IP 102.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
IP 203.0.0.2 255.255.255.0The problem that the tunnel is not coming, I can't pass through phase I.
The IPsec VPN are not my strength. So if someone could show me what mistake I make, I'd appreciate it really.
I joined ouptup #debug R2 crypto isakmp
Source and destination Tunnel0 is belong to VRF INET, the static route need to be updated.
IP route vrf INET 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/0 203.0.0.2
crypto isakmp profile test
VRF INET
door-key test
function identity address 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 -
IPSec VPN between Cisco and ScreenOS
Hello
I'm trying to set up a simple IPSec VPN between a Cisco 2911 router and a Juniper Netscreen ScreenOS (not exactly now the model) device. Initially the debbuging seems good (QM_IDLE), but the ISAKMP Security Association is deleted.
The guy managing the Juniper device send me an extract from his diary:
###########################################################################
2012-08-28 10:24:16 info 00536 IKE Phase 2 msg ID
System 9b 839579: negotiations failed.
2012-08-28 10:24:16 info system 00536 rejected a package of IKE loopback.11
of
: 500 to 217.150.152.45:500 with cookies
87960e39d074ca49 and 9302d26c7ce324a5
because there is no acceptable Phase
2 proposals...
It has defined the following phase 2 proposals:
IKE the value p2-proposal "G2_esp_aes256_sha_1800s" group2 esp aes256-sha-1, 1800 second
###########################################################################
And I use these:
###########################################################################
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA aes 256
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
ISAKMP crypto key
address 217.150.152.45 Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac
card crypto ipsec vpn 2 isakmp
Description * VPN Anbindung nach PKI in Magdeburg *.
defined by peer 217.150.152.45
define security-association life seconds 1800
the value of the transform-set esp - aes
match address PKI-TRAFFIC
!
###########################################################################
Here is my Log:
#################################################################################################################
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL)
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 217.150.152.45, peer port 500
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: new position created post = 0x2A2D7150 peer_handle = 0x8000003A
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x2A2D7150, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): insert his with his 31627E04 = success
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): cannot start aggressive mode, try the main mode.
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-07 ID NAT - t
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-03 ID
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_MM1
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): Beginner Main Mode Exchange
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE
28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP (0): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM1 = IKE_I_MM2
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 239
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key local found
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: analysis of the profiles for xauth...
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 1 against the policy of priority 1
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: SHA hash
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: group by default 2
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: keylength 256
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 1 0 x 51 0x80
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): atts are acceptable. Next payload is 0
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): Acceptable atts: real life: 0
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): Acceptable atts:life: 0
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): fill atts in his vpi_length:4
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): fill atts in his life_in_seconds:86400
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): return real life: 86400
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): timer life Started: 86400.
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 239
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM2 = IKE_I_MM2
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
28 August 08:23:46.452: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
28 August 08:23:46.452: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM2 = IKE_I_MM3
28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP (0): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP
28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM3 = IKE_I_MM4
28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): processing KE payload. Message ID = 0
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (0): processing NONCE payload. Message ID = 0
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM4 = IKE_I_MM4
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): send initial contact
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): ITS been pre-shared key, using id ID_IPV4_ADDR type authentication
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP (1049): payload ID
next payload: 8
type: 1
address: 92.67.80.237
Protocol: 17
Port: 500
Length: 12
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): the total payload length: 12
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM4 = IKE_I_MM5
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP (1049): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): payload ID for treatment. Message ID = 0
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP (1049): payload ID
next payload: 8
type: 1
address: 217.150.152.45
Protocol: 17
Port: 500
Length: 12
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (0): peer games * no * profiles
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 0
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): SA authentication status:
authenticated
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): SA has been authenticated with 217.150.152.45
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: try inserting a peer
/217.150.152.45/500/ and inserted 2A2D7150 successfully. 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM5 = IKE_I_MM6
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM6 = IKE_I_MM6
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM6 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): start Quick Mode Exchange, M - ID of 1582159006
28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): initiator QM gets spi
28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE
28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): entrance, node-1582159006 = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_INIT_QM
28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_QM_READY = IKE_QM_I_QM1
28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE
28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP (1049): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) QM_IDLE
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: node set-452721455 to QM_IDLE
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): HASH payload processing. Message ID =-452721455
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): treatment protocol NOTIFIER PROPOSAL_NOT_CHOSEN 1
SPI 0, message ID =-452721455, his 0x31627E04 =
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive.
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): remove the reason for HIS "fatal Recevied of information' State (I) QM_IDLE (post 217.150.152.45)
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): node-452721455 error suppression FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: node set 494253780 to QM_IDLE
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): purge the node 494253780
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_DEST_SA
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): remove the reason for HIS "fatal Recevied of information' State (I) QM_IDLE (post 217.150.152.45)
Intertoys_Zentrale_Waddinxveen_01 #.
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: Unlocking counterpart struct 0x2A2D7150 for isadb_mark_sa_deleted(), count 0
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 217.150.152.45: 2A2D7150
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): node-1582159006 error suppression FALSE reason 'IKE deleted.
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_DEST_SA = IKE_DEST_SA
#################################################################################################################
Is there something special that needs to be addressed when creating a VPN for Juniper devices?
Greetings
Thomas
The peer IPSec a PFS enabled, do the same in your crypto-map:
card crypto ipsec vpn 2 isakmp
PFS group2 Set
--
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni -
I got a prob while creating a link/link between two tables in a jdeveloper11g
Hi guys...
I got a prob while creating a link/link between two tables in a jdeveloper11g, help me.
I use two table employee, Department.
Unfortunately there is no primary key and foreign key in these tables.now i updated on those of table structure.
I want to create a form like it should be a link between the Department data, i.e. data and employee while the Department is changed then only present corresponding employees in this block...
Table structure as follows
Employee:
-------------------
employe_id,
name,
Department,
GR,
Date of birth
Department of justice
Department:
--------------------
department_id,
department_name;
Note: in the employee department table is the same as in the department table department_id...
So, you want to build master / detail between Department & sub_departments?
In the same way, create a new, yet another link between departments & sub_departments, so that the connection is:
Department.Department_Id = sub_departments.department_id
-
IPSec VPN between ASAs with same subnet for disaster recovery
Hello
I need some clarification from you guys.
To do disaster EasyVPN tunnels for the Cisco ASA 5505 firewall recovery site. Now, there is only one main site and 3 remote sites.
Dr., must use the same subnet that it is on the main site because virtual machines Vmware will be replicated to DR.
For the DR we use Double-Take software.
What is the best solution for this? I think we could use NAT of Destination on ASAs. Other sites (HQ and remote control) will be directed to only address NAT of the
DR and not real which is the same as on the main site.
So guys, will this work? We are using IPSec VPN? In packet - trace on ASA, I see that the package is the first using a NAT, and then encrypted, so it should work, Yes?
I hope someone can confirm this.
I can confirm that this will work certainly,
for prior type natting see 8.3:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080b37d0b.shtml#diag
for 8.3 and later it is also achievable.
-
Can connect to the IPSec VPN, but can not see the internal network
I have several users that can connect to our rooms of ussing IPSec VPN on a 5505. I have a user who can connect, but cannot see the internal network. This user is using DSL with a speedstream 4100. However, I have another user with the same configuration that can connect and see the internal network. Newspapers in ASDM show the link, but do not seem to show any errors trying to access internal. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Bill.
Add...
ISAKMP nat-traversal crypto
-
IPSec VPN between Cisco ASA and Fortigate1000
Hello
I find a useful document on how to create a tunnel VPN IPSec with ASA 5510 firewall Fortigate 1000...
the configuration of the coast FG is done without any problem, BUT the document (. doc FG) said I must configure the ASA with a GRE interface and assign an internal IP address in order to communicate with the FG...
The question is: How do I configure the interface on the SAA ACCORD?
Thanks in advance, Experts...
Kind regards...
ASA firewall does not support the interface/GRE GRE tunnel.
If you need to have GRE configured, you will need to complete the GRE tunnel on router IOS.
If you want to configure just pure tunnel VPN IPSec (lan-to-lan), here is an example of configuration on the side of the ASA:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080950890.shtml
Hope that helps.
-
Multiple IPSec tunnels between two international research reports
Hello, I have a no. 2851 to HQ and 2821 2nd site. Using IPSec VPN to connect two LANs and it works very well. Now, I want to connect another local network on each site through the same VPN. I want to separate the traffic between the LANs. Is this possible?
You cannot use another crypto card if you must use the same IP for the peers you.
If you have other addresses ip at each end to close the tunnel, you can use another crypto card.
If the answer is no, then you can manipulate you acl of the traffic of interest to decide which lan can reach for witch lan.
-
Traffic is failed on plain IPSec tunnel between two 892 s
Have a weird case and you are looking for some suggestions/thougs where to dig because I have exhausted the options.
Note: I replaced the Networkid real to a mentined below.
Topology: a classic IPSec VPN tunnel between two 892 s of Cisco, with pre-shared key and no GRE. A 892 (branch_892) has access to the Internet using PPPoE and has three network / VLAN behind it. A VLAN is coordinated to the PPPoE internet access. Access to the other two VLAN - VL92 (100.100.200.0/24) and VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) is performed via the VPN tunnel.
Second 892 (892_DC) has just one interface - WAN on Gigabit enabled/connected and a static route to the default GW. It doesn't have any defined interal network. If the router is strictly used to send traffic to VL92/VL93 to the domestic 892 via IPSec tunnel.
Here's the problem: access to VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) works, however for VL92 (100.100.100.0/24) - does not work.
Devices in VL92 I ping IP address of 892_DC through the VPN tunnel. The 892_DC router I can ping devices in VL92. However, I can't VL92 ping any device beyond the 892_DC and at the same time the packets arriving on 892_DC for VL92 are not sent through the VPN tunnel.
I took the package trace on 892_DC using capture point/buffer to nathalie caron to VL92 packages and saw that the traffic coming to the 892_DC. I run the nathalie caron even on Branch_892, and there was not a single package.
So... What's the problem? More interesting, I modified the way left on VL92 access list and still - no packets are sent through the tunnel.
Any idea? Two routers config are below
-------
892_DC #show ru
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
hash sha256
preshared authentication
Group 2
isakmp encryption key * address 1.2.3.4
ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals
!
address of 1.2.3.4 crypto isakmp peers
Description of-COIL-892
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac
Crypto ipsec df - bit clear
!
map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp
defined peer 1.2.3.4
disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association
86400 seconds, life of security association set
the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value
match a lists 101
market arriere-route
QoS before filing
!
interface GigabitEthernet0
IP 10,20,30,40 255.255.255.240
IP 1400 MTU
IP tcp adjust-mss 1360
automatic duplex
automatic speed
card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map
!
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.30.41
!
access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 connect
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Branch_892 #sh run
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
hash sha256
preshared authentication
Group 2
isakmp encryption key * address 10,20,30,40
ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals
!
address peer isakmp crypto 10,20,30,40
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac
Crypto ipsec df - bit clear
!
map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp
defined peer 10,20,30,40
disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association
86400 seconds, life of security association set
the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value
match address 101
market arriere-route
QoS before filing
!
FastEthernet6 interface
Description VL92
switchport access vlan 92
!
interface FastEthernet7
Description VL93
switchport access vlan 93
!
interface GigabitEthernet0
Description # to WAN #.
no ip address
automatic duplex
automatic speed
PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1
!
interface Vlan1
Description # local to #.
IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
IP nat inside
IP virtual-reassembly in
!
interface Vlan92
Description fa6-nexus e100/0/40
IP 100.100.200.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan93
Description fa7-nexus e100/0/38
IP 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Dialer0
no ip address
No cdp enable
!
interface Dialer1
IP 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.248
IP mtu 1454
NAT outside IP
IP virtual-reassembly in max-pumping 256
encapsulation ppp
IP tcp adjust-mss 1414
Dialer pool 1
Dialer-Group 1
Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol
PPP chap hostname ~ ~ ~
PPP chap password =.
No cdp enable
card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map
!
Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow
!
access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 any
!
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
Yes correct sounds - so another possible problem is the routing is routing 100% correct on both sides? Can you put the two sides config for review?
-
Easy VPN between two ASA 9.5 - Split tunnel does not
Hi guys,.
We have set up a site to site vpn using easy configuration vpn between ver 9.5 race (1) two ASA. The tunnels are up and ping is reached between sites. I also configured split tunnel for internet traffic under the overall strategy of the ASA easy vpn server. But for some unknown reason all the customer same internet traffic is sent to the primary site. I have configured NAT to relieve on the side of server and client-side. Please advise if no limitation so that the installation program.
Thank you and best regards,
Arjun T P
I have the same question and open a support case.
It's a bug in the software 9.5.1. See the bug: CSCuw22886
-
I can weight of the IPSec Tunnels between ASAs
Hello
Remote site: link internet NYC 150 MB/s
Local site: link internet Baltimore 400 MB/s
Backup site: link internet Washington 200 Mb/s
My main site and my backup site are connected via a gigabit Ethernet circuit between the respective base site switches. Each site has its own internet connection and my OSPF allows to switch their traffic to the backup site if the main website is down. We are opening an office in New York with one ASA unique connected to 150 Mbps FIOS internet circuit. We want to set up an IPSec tunnel on the main site and the backup on the remote site, but want the remote site to prefer the tunnel in Baltimore, except if it is down.
Interesting traffic would be the same for the two tunnels
I know that ASA cannot be a GRE endpoint. How can I force the New York traffic through the tunnel in Baltimore as long as it works? An IPSec tunnel can be weighted?
Thank you
It is not in itself weighting, but you can create up to 10 backup over LAN to LAN VPN IPsec peers.
For each tunnel, the security apparatus tried to negotiate with the first peer in the list. If this peer does not respond, the security apparatus made his way to the bottom of the list until a peer responds, or there is no peer more in the list.
-
How can I create a smoother transition between master pages?
Hello
I am creating a click full screen via the site (see attachment) using different templates. I think that gives me greater control of a slideshow using page layouts. The type remains in the same place but the copy changes according to the different image. Is still making the transition from the masters to be smoother, as in a slide show?
Try using the ToolTip Widget's Composition.
You would do your links triggers are, how your content would be the target. In the properties of the widget, you must set the target to "Stacked".
In this way, when you click on your links on the left you would like to refresh the content (target) without refreshing the entire page.
Maybe you are looking for
-
What type of TV apple TV requires
The purchase of apple TV-two questions: -. Do I need to purchase apps to access the movies using Apple TV? What are the minimum requirements for TV to be compatible with Apple TV?
-
My mozilla has a lock on it, how do I get rid of it
When I turn on my pc, I go to mozilla. the logo has lock on it, how can I get rid of it
-
How to get the BT works after removing the battery of BT on a Satellite A120
Hello I have a new satellite A120 and it had bluetooth...IT HAD bluetooth.I clicked by mistake on the prog to install for battery bluetooth... and it UNINSTALLED. Now, it will not install again. It just happens to 'Setup Bluetooth device', waits, and
-
Satellite A100 - external LCD monitor problems
I love the world of electronics.If you have multiple components built by different people, the problem is always the fault of other manufactuers. I have an A100 and can't seem to find out what happens on the screen, resolution and laptop.I had this s
-
Unable to create the new project Windows Digital Image in 2006.
Original title: Digital Image 2006 Windows? My operating system is Windows XP SP3. I have installed Windows Digital Image 2006 but when I clicked on "create a new project" he has opened with a page containing a red X, calendar, frog and a butterfly,