ASA status interface failover: Normal (pending)

Similar Questions

• ASA outside interface

  Hello

  I configured as a vpn firewall, where nat 0 is configured to asa and card crypto applied on the external interface.

  can I allow to go ith the same firewall (inside the interface and an external interface where isakmp is enabled and crypto map is applied) a normal navigation of traffic for internet surfing?

  I would add that refuse lines in the accesslist nat 0 or all simply do not add the IP traffic source who will use the firewall vpn to simply surf the internet?

  B R,.

  Of course - what you describe is a common way to use the ASA. Your list of nat 0 indicates the ASA who NOT NAT because it is through a VPN tunnel and retaining its original address. Other traffic should be covered by a global NAT (and translated into something like the address of the external interface). Something like this:

  Global (inside) 1 interface

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound

  .. .for an example ASA 8.2 or earlier version.

• Status of the ticket pending - 1291226 # and #1293080

  Hello

  I presented that an update of application for 'SMS Blocker Pro' on 4 March.My release application has been denied. I received an email saying that I need to use BlackBerry with two upper B in the application. I corrected the problem and had forwarded the request again to the portal provider for approval.

  But the status of ticket was then changed to 'pending' the next day. It is in the same status since March 5.

  The ticket number is #1291226.After that there was a bit more change in my application. Still, I introduced a new version with ticket number #1293080.This the other was also put on Hold.I am really not able to understand why the tickets are put on hold.

  I tried to contact the approver team, but I got no answer.

  I hope to have a solution to this problem here.

  Welcome to the forums.

  Just in case you don't know, this is a forum for peer to peer, there is no official support for BlackBerry through these forums which means that your post could not be read and even less responded by a person to the BlackBerry.

  A few days of work isn't really nothing to fear, give 10 working days and if nothing happened to try to make contact again via the provider Portal Support form.

  Maybe there's something that needs to be checked with your app or maybe they just a big queue at the moment.

• ASA with different failover module IPS

  Hi all

  Is it possible to configure the failover of the ASA with different IPS module configuration because we have: ASA 5585-X with firepower PHC-10 and ASA 5585-X with IPS SSP-10

  Thank you

  N °

  Inventories of material (basic unit, memory and optional modules) must be the same in a pair of failover ASA.

• Levels of security ASA Firewall interface and access lists

  Hello

  I am trying to understand the correlation between the ACL and the levels of security on an ASA of the interface.

  I work with an ASA using both! ??

  Is this possible?

  Assumptions: Any ACL applied below is on the wire of transmission (interface) only in the inbound direction.

  Scenario 1

  interface level high security to security level low interface.

  No ACLs = passes as I hope

  What happens if there is an ACL refusing a test package in the above scenario?

  Scenario 2

  Low security to high

  No traffic = ACL will not pass as I hope

  What happens if there is an ACL that allows the trial above package.

  I have trawled through documentation on the web site and cannot find examples, including the two (using ACL in conjunction with security levels).

  Thank you in advance for any help offered.

  Levels of security on the interfaces on the SAA are to define how much you agree with the traffic from this interface.  Level 100 is the most reliable and 0 is least reliable.  Some people will use a DMZ 50 because trust you him so of internet traffic, but less traffic then internal.

  That's how I look at the levels of security:

  A security level of 1 to 99 always two implicit ACL.  To allow traffic down interfaces of security and the right to refuse traffic toward higher level security interfaces.  100 has a security level IP implicitly allowed a full and level 0 has implicit deny ip any one.

  In scenario 1, if you apply an ACL to deny a security level of 1-99, it will eliminate implicit permit than an entire intellectual property and deny traffic based on the ACL and all traffic.  You create an ACL to allow some other desired traffic.  If this ACL is applied to a security level of 100, he'll refuse essentially all traffic because it will remove the authorization implicit ip any any ACL.  Once again, you will need to create an another ACL to allow traffic.

  In scenario 2, if you apply a permit ACL to an interface of level 0 of security, it will allow that traffic, but continue to deny all other traffic.  However, if the security level is 1-100, it will be all traffic to that destination and remove the implicit ACL (permit and deny)

• Can the interface of management firepower & ASA-Inside interface be on separate subnet?

  HI -.

  Need a few more details, please.

  I have a requirment needed to put the power of fire management interface and the interface of the ASA-Inside on different subnets, supports?

  From what I've read so far, most of the document suggests to put two interfaces on the same subnet, is there a reason to do so?

  I may be wrong but I think that fire use management interface to communicate with FireSight for control and comamnd traffic, data traffic real plan always flows from ASA-outside to inside and vice versa, both there are connectivity ip between FireSight and firepower, it should be ok, right? or am I totally wrong, that they must be on the same subnet?

  ASA5515-x with the firepower 5.3.1

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Separate subnets are fine.

  As you have seen correctly - the module of firepower has need to contact FireSIGHT Management Center (IP-wise).

  This path is completely independent of the plan through the ASA data path. The ASA redirects the traffic via the service strategy for the module of firepower entirely internally to the unit.

• The ASA CX Module failover

  Hello

  I didn't send a CX module before. We are about to deploy firewalls 2xASA5585-X with CX (for STROKE and WSE) modules.

  I'm sure I know the answer to this (I've deployed a lot of old OLD ASA with CSC modules in them, and I'm guessing that the CX module has the same).

  1 will be the failure of the module CX trigger a failover event (fail-over active standby)? My guess is not?

  2. If it is not and policy service is set to 'closed' this means that the client should perform a manual failover to the secondary/sleep to restore access, web - this correct?

  Pete

  www.petenetlive.com

  Hi Pete,.

  1 will be the failure of the module CX trigger a failover event (fail-over active standby)? My guess is not.?

  Yes he custom of tipping your ASA, depends on configuration either will be allowed or close the traffic

  In the area if ASA CX card fails, click permit traffic or close traffic. The narrow traffic option defines the ASA to block all traffic if the ASA CX module is not available. Permits for movement option sets the ASA to allow all traffic through, if not inspected, the ASA CX module is not available.

  2 if it is not and the service policy is set to 'closed' this means that the client should perform a manual failover to the secondary/sleep to restore access, web - this correct? .When set to allow traffic CX failure, there is no need to manually failover your ASA firewall between HA

  

  Step 8 check the ASA CX check this box traffic flow.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/Quick_Start/CX/cx_qsg.html#wp49530

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/modules_cx.PDF

• The AIP - SSM to unused ASA connection interface

  Hi people,

  Perhaps, someone has already raised this issue, but I was unable to find anything relevant. We have an ASA with an unused interface (gig0/3). The sensor of the AIP - SSM is physically connected to this interface with the following IP settings:

  Sensor (192.168.2.2/30,192.168.2.1)---interface ASA (192.168.2.1/30)

  It's basically point to point connectivity, and I can reach the ASA of the sensor and the other way around.

  This design is dictated by the lack of a free port on the switch.

  Technically, it should work without any problems, but I can't seem to be able to reach the sensor. There is a switch between my PC and the sensor and the switch has the corresponding static route added. I can reach the switch sensor.

  Is there a security feature hidden I don't know that prevent communication with the sensor.

  And ACL of the sensor allows the traffic to all networks (0.0.0.0/0)

  With the sensor acl set to 0.0.0.0/0, the sensor must be allowing connectivity.

  You can use the 'View of package' command on the sensor to look at packets on the interface command and control to see if the packets are what makes the sensor.

  You say that you have a static route on your switch for the switch reach your sensor. Do you know if your PC is configured to use the switch as the computer's default router. If the PC is to use a different default router, then the other router should also the static route.

  The other possibility is that the SAA itself can be deny traffic.

  Since this is an ASA connected to the MSS interface, the traffic must be routed through the ASA. Standard firewall rules apply to this traffic. The security level of the interfaces can prevent traffic, and an ACL may be necessary in order to allow the circulation of your PC be routed to the SSM.

  NOTE: If you don't want to have to worry about roads, the other alternative is to make the network between the ASA and SSM to be an isolated network that only 2 machines know.

  You can then use PAT static to map a port on the inside of the ASA interface with the address of the SSM 443 https port and map a second port of the SAA within the interfaces to the address of the SSM SSH port.

  How your home PC would simply plug the ASA IP using these specific ports and the ASA would do the translation of port and transmit on the MSS.

  The SSM address could also be dynamically PAT would have on the SAA within the address, so SSM could start the connection to other machines on the inside network.

  Another alternative if you have addresses available on your inside network IP is to use static NAT instead of PAT. And just go forward and has the ASA statically map an IP network on IP of the SSM on the network that only the ASA and the SSM inside could know.

  In both cases the network between the ASA and SSM would not routable at, and you wouldn't have to worry of reproducing static routes anywhere.

  SIDE NOTE: A separate network for the SSM you Becase you will also need to NAT or PAT address of the SSM for the ASA to outside interface. In this way the SSM will be able to connect to Internet to download cisco.com auto updates, and/or pull overall correlation of servers cisco information. It's probably the same configuration that you would already other internal addresses, and just to be sure, you cover the SSM since you have it on a separate subnet.

• ASA 5540 Stateful failover routing errors

  Hello

  Having two 5540's configuration in a failover scenario. Make the LAN failover and failover state. * See attachment *.

  Failover LAN use 192.168.2.1 as active and 192.168.2.2 as before, with the subnet mask of 30. On both LAN failover use G0/2 and there is a crossover cable connecting them.

  The failover of the State uses 192.168.3.1 as active and 192.168.3.2 as before, with the subnet mask of 30. With "enable HTTP replication" checked in ASDM. On both devices State failover uses G0/3 and there is a crossover cable connecting them.

  The ASDM syslog connects errors every 10 seconds or so to say that:

  SOURCE IP ADDRESS: 192.168.3.1

  DESTINATION IP: 192.168.3.2

  Description:

  "Routing could not locate the next hop for igrp NP identity 192.168.3.1/0 in statefull:192.168.3.2/0".

  The ASA use static routes to meet the network, these roads, there are two, and both are in the 10.x.x.x network. No routing protocol is in use.

  I don't know why these errors are "spamming" my syslog and would like to get rid of them.

  Glad to hear that it works, that's the most important thing. I don't mean to preach, but Cisco does not recommend using ADJUSTABLE wires to fail on. Devices cannot always say that the captain should be and usually causes questions more than a simple link to the bottom.

• tunnel upward but not ping of the asa inside interface

  Dear all

  I am establishing a tunnel vpn between cisco asa 5510 and a cisco router. The tunnel is up, and I can ping both cryptographic interfaces. Also, from the console of the asa I can ping to the router lan interface but the router I can not ping the lan interface of the asa, this message appears in the log

  % ASA-3-713042: unable to find political initiator IKE: Intf liaison_BLR, Src: 128.2

  23.125.232, DST: 129.223.123.234

  Here is the config of the equipment.

  I was able to successfully establish an ipsec with an another ROUTER 1841 tunnel. I have 1 hub site and 3 remotes sites with asa as a hub.

  Help, please.

  Your crypto that ACLs are not matching. They must be exact mirror of the other.

  In addition, you can consider setting the levels of security for the interfaces. They are all at 0. The value internal/private those a higher value.

  Let me know how it goes.

  PS. If you find this article useful, please note it.

• ASA - question Interface (IPSec)

  Is it possible on an ASA to "split" the interfaces (e0/0-e0/1 * e0/2-e0/3) to behave in ways that work as distinct from the ASA?

  Goal (2 separate functions)

  --------------------------------

  Function 1

  E0/0 - outside Interface - ISP

  E0/1 - inside Interface - traditional LAN

  2 function

  E0/2 - Interface Outside2 - to be used for an IPSec tunnel through another external network (BGP cloud)

  restricted E0/3 - Inside2 - LAN

  *****************************************

  -e0/2 e0/3 do not cross e0/0 or e0/1 (or vice versa).

  -e0/2 is only used to connect to a remote site, so that the network of remote sites and e0/3 network communicate with each other.

  *****************************************

  I'm not sure it will work, as the route default statement e0/0 quad kill my traffic lanes of the tunnel between the remote and e0/3 site.

  Thoughts or comments?

  Yes, you should be fine. The command I posted above shows that packets are getting encrypted / decrypted. The ASA increments hit ACL of the charges for traffic encrypted/decrypted.

• ASA management interface

  After reading the management description of the command. It seems that only management traffic to the ASA is allowed on this interface (ASDM, Telent, SSH). It cannot be used for NTP, SNMP, or logging. Is that correct. Thank you

  the documents given the management interface only will accept only incoming traffic. SNMP, as will be the outgoing traffic, NTP will not work... you can convert the dedicated management0/0 port in a port routed by way of licensing for asa5510 and higher.

  The low port out-of-band management of the table reference.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html

  the rate of all useful messages.

  Rgds

  Jorge

• Local ASA CA to failover

  people

  I has implemented a vpn ssl on an asa 5540 (8.2), but cannot establish the local authority of ca

  its a pair of active failover / standby

  I knew that this was not enabled on active/active, but I didn't know that it was not also enabled on active/passive

  has one came across this or know if it can be activated?

  Hello

  Unfortunately it is also not supported in Active script / standby.

  There is an enhancement request to have this feature implemented so I would advise you to contact your account team if this feature is important to you, so that they can have it prioritized accordingly: CSCsm17487 CA Local: failover / load balancing Support.

  Kind regards

  Nicolas

• Working status interface Windows does not

  I have a Lexmark X 6575 printer with a wireless connection to a Dell PC with Windows 7. Whenever I feel that I have to manually close the window status of the job to print again!

  Hello

  Step 1: Try Microsoft fix it in

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/troubleshoot-printer-problems

  Step 2: See also: http://support.lexmark.com/index?page=content&id=SO5456&actp=search&viewlocale=en_US&userlocale=EN_US&segment=SUPPORT&productCode=&searchid=1287630111407

• ACS 5.1 / ASA AAA local failover if unknown user

  Hello

  I know that the way to set the ASA to the relief of LOCAL authentication, if the Radius Server is not available.

  Now, we want authenticate users, if the user is not in the ad. Is this possible and how do I set it up with new policies? I tested it with a 'fall' when the user is not in the ad, but then the Radius Server will be marked as 'dead' and other users of the AD can not connect during a given period. Perhaps we can set the timeout to 0, but it's not as nice as it could be.

  Thank you very much in advance and consider better?

  Dominic

  This can be done by creating a sequence identity (users and identity stores > identity store sequences)

  A sequence of identity store gives you access to several databases in sequence until the user authenticates

  Create a sequence, and then select the database password, then AD1 followed by "Internal users" in the "authentication method list. Once created, the sequence is selectable so as the result of corresponding identity politics