ASA VPN with Fortgate

Hello people!

I still have the problem with VPN... Laughing out loud

I have to create a new VPN site to site between ASA 5510 (8.42 IOS) and Fortgate, but something is very strange, Don t VPN came and I see in the debug crypto 10 ikev1 the newspaper to follow:

[IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

But if I ask the other peer to change in Group 2, the msg in the SAA is:

[IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1

Fortgate is possible to activate the two specific groups of VPN 1 and 2, and I would ask the other peer left this way and the ASA show:

[IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1
[IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

The show isakmp his:

9 counterpart IKE: 179.124.32.181
Type: user role: answering machine
Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG3

I have delete and creat VPN 3 x and the same error occurs.

Everyone has seen this kind of problem?

Is it using Fortigate version 5 by chance?

I saw Cisco ASA VPN problems repeatedly with this code Fortigate, but above all it has been a problem of Phase 2 and defining KB life maximally on the side of the ASA has solved it... However this seems not to be your problem here.

The first thing in your config I see you have PFS enabled - have you insured it is located on the side of Fortinet or tried to turn it off on the side of Cisco to see if it happens?

Be stuck at MM_WAIT_MSG3 means that you sent your return policy, but then you have not received the third package in the ISAKMP riding so either the Fortigate is unhappy with something or there's a routing problem (however unlikely given that you have already had communication)

Try on the side of the ASA:

debug crypto isakmp 7
You can also confrm your external interface is 'outside1 '? You can see this "see intellectual property."

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • ASA vpn with a public ip address different addresses

    Hello world. I can not find someone who can give me an answer 'for sure' of this thing. I want to connect via vpn ASA5505, called 2A and b. inside one we have net 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.0.1.0/24 net b. now, we can have 2 outside for one ip addresses (e.g. 215.18.18.10 and 222.26.12.12) because we have 2 providers to connect to the internet. the asa can follow 2 VPN - with the same cryptomap for the destination inside) so that if a grave he will switch to the other vpn by itself?

    This thing can be done with other cisco devices (for example, a 2800 series router?)

    Thank you very much

    Who are you looking to

    1. If the failure of the connection to B then A will use secondary WAN connection to try to raise the tunnel.

    I would use the backup ISP for this function.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806e880b.shtml

    2. If the connection to A failed then B will try to set up the tunnel with secondary address peer.

    You can set several counterparts by using cryptographic cards to provide redundancy

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080450b73.html#wp1042941

  • ASA VPN with ISE and different backends WBS for authentication

    Hello

    I have an AAA-problem I hope to have a few problems help.

    The problem ultimately is: how the ASA via ISE send Radius Access requests to different given OTP backends provided a connection to a certain group of Tunnel.

    BACKGROUND:

    I'll try to give you a brief picture of the scenario, this is what I currently have.

    A VPN system (ASA 8.4 (4)) where I let my users to choose among 3 different methods of authentication being

    (1) certificate (on chip card)

    (2) token - token of the OTP (One Time Password provided via the smartphone application: using pledge of Nordic OTP-Edge transport server)

    (3) SMS - OTP token (Nordic OTP - Edge transport server SMS OTP)

    The choice corresponds to different groups of profiles/Tunnel connection.

    Today, all authentication requests go directly to the OTP server and authorization goes directly to the AD via LDAP.

    THE PROBLEM:

    The problem occurs when I try to put in the ISE in the mixture.

    What I obviously (?) would like to do is have all the network authentication/authorization to go through my ISE platform to take advantage of a centralized administration, monitoring etc.

    Again I would need to use data bases different backend such as AD and Nordic OTP - Edge server, but then mandated by ISE.

    For me to be able to know what back-end AAA to the proxy system, to somehow be able to distinguish the incoming Radius Access-requests.

    WHAT WE CALL:

    At the time of the ASA 8.4.3 Radius access request contains 2 new attributes, the name of Group of Tunnel and the Type of customer, when a VPN user connects.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/ref_extserver.html#wp1802187

    QUESTION:

    The seams, that I can achieve what I want by looking at the access request attribute Radius "Tunnel Group Name" and forward my request to different backends OTP for the authentication part therefore in theory. But, how do I actually go ahead and set that up in ISE?

    I don't see this attribute when I look at the details of Radius Authentication for an authentication AAA of the ASA at the ISE.

    Best regards

    / Mattias

    I think you can hit the following problem:

    CSCtz49846: ISE does not match the condition with VPN 146 Tunnel-Group-Name attribute

    This issue is not specific to this attribute, as shown in the solution shown in the accompanying note

    Workaround

    Ensure that the attribute name does not include a '.' character. This also applies to some of the existing attributes in the dictionary of Cisco-VPN300. Attribute names should be changed so that they do not include a "." character.

  • ASA VPN with certificates

    I'm after abit of consultation.

    I have an ASA 5510 in my hub, static public IP address.

    Then I have an ASA 5505 like my talk, with a dynamic IP address.

    I used a dynamic encryption with PSK card and everything seems functional.

    One of my concerns are that I was forced to use aggressive mode to make it work. I am well aware of the security risks.

    I seek to use certificates in read in aggressive mode.

    If I use an internal Windows certificate authority, what will happen with the revocations.

    If my trying to connect but cannot check Revocation because the server is internal to the VPN will connect?

    Also can I put my certifcates to be valid for a long time, for example ten years so that I don't have to worry about certificates expireing?

    Answer online

    If I use an internal Windows certificate authority, what will happen with the revocations.

    < if="" you="" enable="" revocation="" check,="" you="" have="" to="" make="" your="" internal="" server="" accessiable="" to="" the="" remote="">

    Otherwise you can disable revocation checking.

    If my trying to connect but cannot check Revocation because the server is internal to the VPN will connect?

    Also can I put my certifcates to be valid for a long time, for example ten years so that I don't have to worry about certificates expireing?

    < it="" is="" controled="" by="" ca="" server="" which="" issue="" the="" certificate="" to="">

  • Between Cisco ASA VPN tunnels with VLAN + hairpin.

    I have two Cisco ASA (5520 and 5505) both with version 9.1 (7) with Over VPN and Security Plus licenses. I try to understand all the internet a traffic tunnel strategy VLAN especially on the 5520 above the 5505 for further routing to the internet (such as a hair/u-turn hairpin). A few warnings:

    1. The 5505 has a dynamically assigned internet address.
    2. The 5505 has sometimes no device turned on behind her, bringing interfaces down to the inside (which can cause problems from site to site).
    3. The 5520 cannot be a client of ezvpn due to its current role as a server of webvpn (anyconnect).

    Let me know if I need to post my current config. Basically, I'm starting from scratch after several attempts.

    Thank you!

    1. The 5505 has a dynamically assigned internet address.

    You can use the following doc to set up the VPN and then this document to configure Hairping/U tuning

    2. the 5505 has sometimes no device turned on behind her, bringing interfaces down to the inside (which can cause problems from site to site).

    Make sure that the interface is connected to a switch so that it remains all the TIME.

    3. 5520 the may not be a ezvpn customer due to she has current as one role anyconnect webvpn ()) server.

    You can use dynamic VPN with normal static rather EZVPN tunnel.

    Kind regards
    Dinesh Moudgil

    PS Please rate helpful messages.

  • Redundancy with double tis on cisco ASA VPN Site to Site

    Dear supporters,

    Could you help me to provide a configuration for the network as an attachment diagram.

    I am suitable with your help.

    Thank you

    Best regards

    Hi Sothengse,

    You can visit the below link and configure ASA @ head and Canes accordingly to your condition.

    You must change the configuration of the similar example with ends... Double TIS @ ends in your scenario...

    http://networkology.NET/2013/03/08/site-to-site-VPN-with-dual-ISP-for-BA...

    I hope this helps.

    Concerning

    Knockaert

  • site to site vpn with ASA 5500 series SSL?

    We have routers DLink DIR - 130 5505 s ASA and PIXen, all work well with our PIX 515E, we need to replace.

    We also have Internet satellite in two places. High latency makes IPsec VPN to DLinks on these very slow sites.

    We were informed by HughesNet that a SSL VPN will mitigate some of the problems of latency.

    However, we cannot use a VPN client for the biometric timeclocks in these places, the clocks need static IP addresses and are more or less "dumb terminals".

    The machine of series 5000 ASA VPN site to site similar to OpenVPN or only the most comment client-server type SSL VPN connections?

    Thank you, Tom

    Hi Thomas,

    The SSL VPN on ASAs feature is a client/server relationship where the remote computer can connect without client (browser) or clientbased (AnyConnect) to the ASA.

    Federico.

  • Remote access VPN with ASA 5510 by using the DHCP server

    Hello

    Can someone please share your knowledge to help me find out why I'm not able to receive an IP address on the remote access VPN connection so that I can get an IP local pool DHCP?

    I'm trying to set up remote access VPN with ASA 5510. It works with dhcp local pool but does not seem to work when I tried to use an existing DHCP server. It is tested in an internal network as follows:

    !

    ASA Version 8.2 (5)

    !

    interface Ethernet0/1

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    IP 10.6.0.12 255.255.254.0

    !

    IP local pool testpool 10.6.240.150 - 10.6.240.159 a mask of 255.255.248.0. (worked with it)

    !

    Route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.6.0.1 1

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac FirstSet

    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

    Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

    Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1jeu transform-set FirstSet

    dynamic mymap 1 dyn1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    mymap map crypto inside interface

    crypto ISAKMP allow inside

    crypto ISAKMP policy 1

    preshared authentication

    3des encryption

    sha hash

    Group 2

    life 43200

    !

    VPN-addr-assign aaa

    VPN-addr-assign dhcp

    !

    internal group testgroup strategy

    testgroup group policy attributes

    DHCP-network-scope 10.6.192.1

    enable IPSec-udp

    IPSec-udp-port 10000

    !

    username testlay password * encrypted

    !

    tunnel-group testgroup type remote access

    tunnel-group testgroup General attributes

    strategy-group-by default testgroup

    DHCP-server 10.6.20.3

    testgroup group tunnel ipsec-attributes

    pre-shared key *.

    !

    I got following output when I test connect to the ASA with Cisco VPN client 5.0

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: (4) SA (1) + KE + NUNCIO (10) + ID (5), HDR + VENDO

    4024 bytesR copied in 3,41 0 seconds (1341 by(tes/sec) 13) of the SELLER (13) seller (13) + the SELLER (13), as well as the SELLER (13) ++ (0) NONE total length: 853

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, SA payload processing

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing ke payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing ISA_KE

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, nonce payload processing

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing ID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received xauth V6 VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, DPD received VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received Fragmentation VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: real aggressive Mode: false

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received NAT-Traversal worm 02 VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, the customer has received Cisco Unity VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, connection landed on tunnel_group testgroup

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA payload processing

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 9 entry overall IKE acceptable matches # 1

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build the payloads of ISAKMP security

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building ke payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building nonce payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Generating keys for answering machine...

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, construction of payload ID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash for ISAKMP

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of Cisco Unity VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing payload V6 VID xauth

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building dpd vid payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing the payload of the NAT-Traversal VID ver 02

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, NAT-discovery payload construction

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, NAT-discovery payload construction

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, construction of Fragmentation VID + load useful functionality

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, send Altiga/Cisco VPN3000/Cisco ASA GW VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR SA (1) KE (4) NUNCIO (10) + ID (5) + HASH (8) + SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) NAT - D (130) + NAT - D (130) of the SELLER (13) + the seller (13) + NONE (0) total length: 440

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + NAT - D (130) + NAT - D (130) of the SELLER (13) + the seller (13) + NONE (0) overall length: 168

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash for ISAKMP

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing notify payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload NAT-discovery of treatment

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload NAT-discovery of treatment

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, useful treatment IOS/PIX Vendor ID (version: 1.0.0 capabilities: 00000408)

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, the customer has received Cisco Unity VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, I

    [OK]

    KenS-mgmt-012 # P = 10.15.200.108, status of automatic NAT detection: remote end is NOT behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = d4ca48e4) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 72

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = d4ca48e4) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 87

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, transformation MODE_CFG response attributes.

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: primary DNS = authorized

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: secondary DNS = authorized

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: = authorized primary WINS

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: = authorized secondary WINS

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Compression IP = disabled

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Split Tunneling political = disabled

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: setting Proxy browser = no - modify

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: browser Local Proxy bypass = disable

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, (testlay) the authenticated user.

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 6b1b471) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 64

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 6b1b471) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + NONE (0) overall length: 60

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, cfg ACK processing attributes

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 49ae1bb8) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 182

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, treatment cfg request attributes

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the IPV4 address!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the IPV4 network mask!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for DNS server address.

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the address of the WINS server.

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, transaction mode attribute unhandled received: 5

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the banner!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for setting save PW!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: receipt of request for default domain name!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for Split-Tunnel list!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for split DNS!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for PFS setting!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the Proxy Client browser setting!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the list of backup peer ip - sec!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for setting disconnect from the Client Smartcard Removal!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the Version of the Application.

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Type of Client: Windows NT Client Application Version: 5.0.07.0440

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for FWTYPE!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: request received for the DHCP for DDNS hostname is: DEC20128!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the UDP Port!

    Jan 16 15:39:32 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, in double Phase 2 detected packets.  No last packet retransmit.

    Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = b04e830f) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84

    Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing notify payload

    Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, in double Phase 2 detected packets.  No last packet retransmit.

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE has received the response from type [] at the request of the utility of IP address

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, cannot get an IP address for the remote peer

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, case of mistaken IKE TM V6 WSF (struct & 0xd8030048) , : TM_DONE, EV_ERROR--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_IP_FAIL--> TM_BLD_REPLY NullEvent--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_GET_IP--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_NEED_IP--> TM_WAIT_REQ, EV_PROC_MSG--> TM_WAIT_REQ, EV_HASH_OK--> TM_WAIT_REQ, NullEvent

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, case of mistaken IKE AM Responder WSF (struct & 0xd82b6740) , : AM_DONE, EV_ERROR--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG_V6H, EV_TM_FAIL--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG_V6H NullEvent--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG, EV_WAIT--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_CHECK_QM_MSG--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_TM_XAUTH_OK--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H NullEvent--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_ACTIVATE_NEW_SA

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA AM:bd3a9a4b ending: 0x0945c001, refcnt flags 0, tuncnt 0

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, sending clear/delete with the message of reason

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing the payload to delete IKE

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 9de30522) with payloads: HDR HASH (8) + DELETE (12) + (0) NONE total length: 80

    Kind regards

    Lay

    For the RADIUS, you need a definition of server-aaa:

    Protocol AAA - NPS RADIUS server RADIUS

    AAA-server RADIUS NPS (inside) host 10.10.18.12

    key *.

    authentication port 1812

    accounting-port 1813

    and tell your tunnel-group for this server:

    General-attributes of VPN Tunnel-group

    Group-NPS LOCAL RADIUS authentication server

    --
    Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
    http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

  • VPN with ASA 5500 VPN with PIX 515E vs

    I wonder what are the differences between the use of an exisitng PIX 515E for VPN remote users as appossed to acquire an ASA 5500 VPN remote users? Information or advice are appreciated to help me lean toward one or the other.

    Craig

    According to the version of the code that you run on the PIX on the PIX or ASA VPN features must be the same. So if the choice is not based on differences in features, what else would help guide the choice? You can consider if the existing PIX has sufficient resources to add the extra processing VPN load or if you should put that on another box. You might consider that the PIX is an older product range, and his end is near, while the ASA is the product that is the strategic replacement for the PIX. Given a choice I probably prefer to use a technology newer than the old technology. I also believe that the ASA will give you more choice of technology to go forward (a way of better growth) while the PIX provides current capacity but no path of growth.

    On the other hand, there is the aspect of consider that using the existing PIX does not need not to buy something new and ASA would be an expense you have to cover in the budget. And for some people the budget constraint is an important consideration.

    HTH

    Rick

  • ASA VPN RA, iPad, PC

    Hello

    I apologize if this has already been asked.  If you see a thread asked that same question, please link.

    I am currently overseas and want to set up my house (WE) ASA 5505 with two profiles VPN; a complete tunnel, a tunnel split.  This will allow me to connect to my PC or iPad and access my things at home (split tunnel), or reach Web sites are supplied with of my U.S. address (full-tunnel).

    I prefer to go on this configuration via CLI as I am not too familiar with the GUI.

    My first question is just a base: what I?  Remote access VPN with several groups?  AnyConnect?  Eazy VPN?  I'm not strong on the platform of the SAA, so any help would be appreciated.  I'd like to use the iPad built-in optional IPSEC VPN (marked "Cisco").

    Thanks for any help

    -Scott

    ASA 5505 9.1 (1)

    Do you mean to give your VPN internet access users while using the complete tunnel? Then Yes you would do a NAT and allow also the ASA send traffic on the same interface, that he received the.

    purpose of VPN network

    subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    dynamic NAT interface (outdoors, outdoor)

    permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  • Issue of ASA vpn site to site isakmp

    Hello

    He has been asked to configure on ASA a new vpn site-to-site. For that vpn should I put:

    crypto isakmp identity address
    crypto ISAKMP allow outside

    .. the configuration of my identity crypto isakmp is automatic and isakmp crypto is not enabled on any interface. I love vpn with ike enabled on the external interface. My question is: why should I enable isakmp on the external interface and especially can create disturbances to ike vpn that are already in place?

    By elsewhere-group or tunnel-group strategy, it was me asked to set up, the two do not have indication of ike. Never seen this kind of configuration before vpn, something new.

    Thank you

    Hi, Giuseppe.

    The crypto isakmp command activate outside changed ikev1 crypto Enable outside in the new ASA versions you need not enable this.

    There is also no need configure isakmp crypto identity address such that it is set to auto.

    This command indicates that the tunnel would be negotiated on the basis of the IP address but since it is set to auto it on it own will therefore not need to specify this command.

    Yes, you can create a new group policy group for this new tunnel and tunnel and there should be no impact on other tunnels of work.

    Kind regards

    Aditya

    Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

  • Data capture ASA VPN

    Hello

    We have an asa 5585 on the network and it is configured for remote access VPN with RSA.

    When a VPN user connects to their VPN, he is invited for a PIN followed their secure ID token code.

    We want to simplify our VPN configuration if we starting from a perspective of support and management, users use a hard chips. Currently, many lose their chips or have a connection problem, so I would like to know what simple VPN solution, we have in place.

    Then is it possible on the ASA when I check my VPN traffic to determine what users are using the VPN for, since the purpose is if they only use it for email, so we can advise them to use webmail rather and can disable VPN access.

    With respect to the VPN, I see only two options; you either empty tokens to make life easier or you keep them and put up with it.

  • Assign the static IP address by ISE, ASA VPN clients

    We will integrate the remote access ASA VPN service with a new 1.2 ISE.

    Authentication is performed in Active directory. After authentication, can address assigned to a specific user of VPN by ISE IP?

    This means that the same VPN user will always get the same IP address. Thank you.

    Daniel,

    You can override the IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address in the authorization policy.

    However if I may make a suggestion:

    Unless you have only a handful of users to do so, it may be appropriate to assign the address of ISE pool or perform the mapping of LDAP attributes on ASA itself.

    In the latter case, the IP addresses are kept on the server as LDAP attributes and ASA will map the IP address. You don't want to keep address IP DB in several places.

    M.

  • question links to site 2 site VPN with authentication cert

    Currently we are accumulate tunnel site-2-site VPN with our client. Usually we use pre-shared key as authentication with other customers without any problems, but it must use authentication cert with her this time. But the question is that our CA is different from theirs. I tried a few times, but he failed. Is it someone please let me know that he must have the certificate issued by the same certification authority to create the VPN tunnel?

    Thank you very much!

    Hello

    You can read this document to get a simple example of setting up a VPN S2S using certificates on an ASA:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080aa5be1.shtml

    Basically the sides must have the same certification authority and If there is an intermediate certificate that must be installed also. The ASA 2 will generate a CSR (certificate access code request), now then PKI will create a certificate for both parties, commonly called "certificate of identity".

    Please pass a note and mark as he corrected the post helpful!

    David Castro,

    Kind regards

  • ASA VPN positive = SSL VPN?

    Hello

    I have a pair of FO, I need to exchange an ASA5520 who owns a license of VPN over 750

    Can I use an ASA5520 with ASA5500-SSL-750 instead

    Regards Tony

    Yes, it is always available on order. Part number: ASA5520-VPN-PL =

    In addition, this more ASA VPN would be much much cheaper than the SSL VPN license.

    Thank you

    Kiran

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to contribute to office for french communities firefox?

    I want to contribute to forefox by providing aid for french users.How can I contribute taking tutorials or other documents. Thanks for your reply.Kind regardsJBTron.

  • HP Photosmart C4780 MAC OSx 10.8 Mountain Lion

    When printing, a few lines of text, from the left to the right of the page, only display the top part of the letters.  Other lines are fine.  Printer status report shows same problem, but otherwise ok.

  • New hard drive, OS transfer?

    I have a 2000 2b09wm hp. He just broke, gives me the error message saying in that I needed a new hard drive. Suppose the old went kaput (even though I bought this pc on eBay not a month or two before). So, I now have a new hard drive, but not bone. I

  • On USB AutoRun.inf does not run automatically when I insert a flash drive

    All that happens is a Windows Explorer window, display the content of the flash player. I have configured my Windows XP (SP3) not to run CD when I insert the. Change that has had no effect on the flash drive. Here is the content of the AutoRun.inf fi

  • Good Ram for my Acer?

    Hey guys I just wanted to make sure if it's the right ram for my acer aspire E11 2.16 ghz laptop 11.6. http://www.Amazon.com/crucial-PC3-12800-204-pin-notebook-CT102464BF160B/DP/B006YG8X9Y/ref=sr_1_1?IE=...