BlendMode.LAYER & amp; wmode = transparent & amp; FF bug

Similar Questions

• Firefox suddenly some wmode transparent lines. Instead, view the contents of my white instead of transparent. Help.

  Please help solve my problem of flash! The menu has always worked perfectly for several years. Suddenly, it works yesterday.

  The DOM Inspector shows that the menu has wmode = "opaque" in the EMBED for Firefox.

  It seems that there is a running script that modifies wmode = "transparent" wmode = "opaque" to the EMBED tags (OBJECT still has wmode = "transparent").

• Photoshop opens the dialog box when you try to fill a layer with locked transparent pixels

  This script should set the layer to lock transparent pixels and then fill the layer with a color. She is doing this, except when it is in the filling phase, it opens the dialog box fill, and you have to hit OK.

  If you omit the transparent pixel line, it works as not expected, no dialog boxes.

  Is there a way to remove the box? Or I'm doing something wrong, which is causing the box to open?

  #target photoshop
  app.bringToFront();
  
  doc = app.activeDocument;
  doc.artLayers[0].isBackgroundLayer = false;
  doc.artLayers[0].transparentPixelsLocked = true;
  app.activeDocument.selection.fill(app.foregroundColor); 
  

  Not sure why this is happening.

  But I would recommend blocking the above and using the AM code for a fill that pays tribute to transparency.

  #target photoshop

  app.bringToFront ();

  doc = app.activeDocument;

  doc.artLayers [0] .isBackgroundLayer = false;

  doc.activeLayer = doc.artLayers [0];

  // =======================================================

  idFl var = charIDToTypeID ("Fl");

  var desc18 = new ActionDescriptor();

  var idUsng = charIDToTypeID ("Usng");

  var idFlCn = charIDToTypeID ("FlCn");

  var idFrgC = charIDToTypeID ("FrgC");

  desc18.putEnumerated (idUsng, idFlCn, idFrgC);

  var idOpct = charIDToTypeID ("PCT");

  var idPrc = charIDToTypeID ("#Prc");

  desc18.putUnitDouble (idOpct, idPrc, 100.000000);

  TSM var = charIDToTypeID ("Md");

  var idBlnM = charIDToTypeID ("BlnM");

  var idNrml = charIDToTypeID ("Nrml");

  desc18.putEnumerated (TSM, idBlnM, idNrml);

  var idPrsT = charIDToTypeID ("PrsT");

  desc18.putBoolean (idPrsT, true);

  executeAction (idFl, desc18, DialogModes.NO);

• PROBLEM incorporating an as3 swf whith wmode = "transparent".

  Hello I know it seems stupid and that this code is a javascript script, but I have this peace of code and I don't know where to put the setting wmode = "transparent".

  " < script type =" text/javascript"src =" http://AJAX.googleapis.com/AJAX/libs/SWFObject/2.2/SWFObject.js "> < / script > .

  var flashvars = {};

  var params = {};

  attributes of var = {};

  Attributes.ID = "as3_js";

  swfobject.embedSWF ("MandalaPlayer.swf", "alt", "244" and "245", "9.0.0"", false, flashvars, params, attributes);

  It actually load the swf file into the 'alt' DIV, but I need transparency. :-)

  The thing is that I know how to embed with the wmode = "transparent" with the post parameter in flash, but knit something else does'nt then it is my comunication javascript to Flash (I use javascript to control my mp3player of the htmlpage) so I don't know what to do :-)

  I think it is asigned as one of the params...

  params = {wmode: "transparent"},

• When I unlock the background layer, everything is transparent.

  I use the 64-bit version of Photoshop CS6 on Windows 7 Home Premium.

  
  

  When I double click on the background, the new transparent layer. It also happens when I drag the image to the duplicate icon.

  

  I did something wrong? What should I do?

  Update your driver from the website of the manufacturer of the GPU video card.

  If you cannot update the driver for a reason, disable GPU design in Photoshop and then restart Photoshop, until you can get ann updated driver that corrects bugs in the video card driver.

• Photoshop CC: Layer behavior merging with Assembly Animations (Bug?)

  Hello

  We work a lot with the chronology of Photoshop in our society. After upgrading Photoshop CC, we met a different behavior with CS6.

  Picture of a file with an animation of script consisting for example of 8 frames, with 8 layers, each layer visibility, exposed on a single image (Layer 1 presentation in frame 1, layer 2 presentations in box 2, etc.) and all the other non-visible layer.

  In Photoshop CS6, if I create a new layer for example in box 4 of my calendar above layer 4 (which is the layer that is visible only in this context) and he merged down on layer 4 (by selecting it and pressing the shortcut CTRL + E), the resulting layer inherited all the exposure of layer settings 4 , but contained visual content merged layer 4 and previously new layer above it. This is what I want.

  Now in Photoshop CC, when you perform the same action, the layers are merged and kept the name of layer 4, however the visibility of the Pavilion is not inherited properly. The layer resulting is exposed (visible) on all the images in the scenario, while it actually should only be exposed in frame 4.

  Also note that the timeline "New layers visible in images" option is disabled. So even if treated Photoshop layer merged as a new layer real, it should not expose its visibility in all the other frames.

  The only solution I have found so far is to "unify the visibility of the layer", hiding the layer, then disabling "unify the visibility of the layer" again. It is annoying however and the brand-new behavior seems to be a bug for me. Do developers comment on that? Thank you.

  Kind regards

  Hannes Drexl

  This corrected by Photoshop CC 2015.

• How can I add just a solid layer? (not transparent)

  Hello. How can I add just a fill layer Uni? I click on 'Add a layer' and the layer that is added is transparent. Thank you guys

  PES 9 there is a button at the bottom of the layers panel, you press

  for a list of adjustment layers.

  Also the layer > fill new layer > solid color.

  

  MTSTUNER

• How to make a transparent dynamic textbox - BUG!

  For some reason any dynamic text box has a white background and a black border, that I can't remove. Is there a way I can change the color, or make transparent as before, so that the way in which the text is only showing?

  If you have manually set the textfield on the stage then you can set if it has a background in the properties panel.  You can also assign to do not have a background with Actionscript, but try using the properties panel, if you are not familiar with this encoding.

• Click on the layer behind a transparency mask

  Is this possible to do?

  The mask is laid out in front of the layer that I want to click.

  If the mask is a symbol, then he's locked in a div. It's somewhat misjudged CSS which is very convenient for the passage of the click event handler in one div to another. (At least it was unknown to me until very recently.)

  pointer-events:none;

  See
  http://StackOverflow.com/questions/3680429/click-through-a-div-to-underlying-elements

  for some conditional expressions of IE. I hope this helps.

• WMode = Transparent not available for all browsers

  Is there a another way of div using the z-index while still exposing the features of Flash in a div of lower order of the stack?  I looked around and it seems to me that almost everyone has just given up trying.  Personally, I can give up on this too, but this means not to use Flash Content.  I'd really rather use Flash because the content of my Bill is for my SIG. the Flash of Adobe I working on a demo showing various film techniques, using Flash.  The project is incomplete, but you can see it would be ill-advised to launch a Flash without any Flash demo

  The demo is on my site staff cinematics

  Check it out and let me know if you have any ideas.  I hope that the ideas will not deal, avoid Firefox, Safari and Chrome, or take the divs and simply run the Flash.  Thank you, people, you're awesome!

  -james

  Content Flash is still sitting on top of any other content.

  Just to expand a bit on this comment, the Flash is called "Active content", which means that it is comic permanently even after the page is rendered.  All active content, therefore, will rise to the top of the page, including Flash, ActiveX, and certain elements of the form (such as select tags).  I'm guessing that there are other active elements, I remember everything, but these three give you an idea of the scale.

• Weird bug?  Transparent background is black instead of checkered in RGB mode

  If I try to do a new RGB document with the content of the value Transparent canvas background is filled with black instead of the motif model.  However more in the layers window the small icon of the layer shows as transparent with the checkerboard. In the channels window, it seems too transparent, and if I click on one of the channels that allows to select only one canvas changes from black to the ground.  If I click on the RGB layer above the canvas becomes again black.

  Why this is happening and how to fix it?

  If I open a new document in CMYK mode, I get the checkerboard like I'm supposed to.

  I bought a new PC a few days ago and it is a new installation of Adobe CS4 on Windows 7.  Photoshop is updated to version 11.0.2.

  I swear that this was not the case a couple of days, when I installed it first, and it has never happened on my old XP computer.

  Edit to add: all files show a black background in RGB mode rather than the ground grid, not only when you create a new document.

  What are the Photoshop > Preferences > transparency & Gamut > transparency settings?

  Mat-text:

  Powering the OpenGL in the Performance preference and restarting Photoshop have no bearing on the question?

  Except that are Photoshop and OS fully updated and have you performed routines normal troubleshooting (trashing prefs in now command-alt-shift/ctrl-alt-shift key while starting Photoshop, deactivation of 3rd-party plug-ins, system maintenance, validation of fonts, etc.)?

• z index / layer of problems with the new YouTube widget!

  Hello!

  I am facing a problem with the new 'youtube' of social media widget. I currently have two layers in my projects. This is a project for which the menu scrolls initially and then sticks to the top of scrolling parallax. By continuing to scroll, the embedded YouTube video widget does not scroll under the menu as it should but scrolls through the menu. It's strange, as the YouTube widget was placed on level 1 and the menu is at level 2. Shouldn't the menu then always be on top? Only the new widget is not properly defined index-z?

  You can check my web project (and look at the code) here: http://www.firstlight.at

  Any help is greatly appreciated!

  I managed to solve the problem, and I believe this to certainly be a bug in Muse...

  In order to avoid widgets Youtube iframed swim on top of all the other div tags, I had to change the code, add wmode = "transparent" and wmode = "Opaque" to the class of the iframe. This works if you replace all the other parameters behind the CBC "&" by "& amp"tag.

  Here's the original code generated by Muse. This could not prevent my "2nd layer" slip below "Layer 1".

  Makes the following changes to the code, forced the Youtube widget below all other div again (I pinned all changes to "BOLD", so you can see the changes easily):

  Ensure that you do not miss the following change: you need to change all of the vipers '&' to '& amp' this procedure will not work!

  After the new version, I'm sure the Adobe team is working hard to bust of bug last version. But I hope that we will be dismantled soon, otherwise users using the youtube widget will have to recode output Muse whenever we make a change and it is exactly what is the Muse striving to prevent (; After all, in Dreamweaver, you can hardcode the change and he would stick!

  I hope that it will be useful to someone!

• Major problem with transparency using Flash Player 11 on IE 9 with Intel HD graphics card

  There are some problems with Flash Player 11,0,1,152 with Intel HD graphics card when using Internet Explorer 9 with hardware acceleration enabled.

  Transparencies are not working!

  They appear just like the black areas on the page when wmode = "transparent".

  See my bug for details, test URL and screenshots.

  I logged a bug:

  https://bugs.Adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-4370

  I've also seen a few similar posts:

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/3992938

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/3992736

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/3992735

  To work around this problem, you can disable hardware acceleration in the settings of IE9 to prevent this, but performance is terrible and this is not a solution.

  Can someone from Adobe please tell me when this is likely to be resolved - this is a pretty catestrophic bug!

  Everyone knows this?

  Thank you

  Luke

  Transparency bug has been fixed in 11.1.102.55 to today release so please check if your problem still exists or resolved. It is useful if you update result on above bugs.

• Wmode, overflow: hidden, Firefox, help!

  Ok. I have a problem.
  
  I have a video player that I created which can be dynamically sized. The SWF file will reside in a div positioned absolutely which has overflow: hidden. The SWF file is set to no, and the viewable area is cut by the visible area of the div.
  
  Ok no problem.
  
  Then, I wanted to make the transparent SWF. wmode = "transparent", I come here. OK, that's fine. The SWF is searchable very well it is clipped div in FF and IE.
  
  So now, I want to add the ability to go full screen. OK, apparently full screen cannot be used with wmode = "opaque" or wmode = "transparent" OK, I can live without the transparent SWF. Bye-Bye, wmode parameter.
  
  BUT now, in FireFox, without wmode = "transparent" or wmode = "opaque", the overflow: hidden is IGNORED for the SWF! Darn huge SWF all appear independently of overflow of the div.
  
  Is this a bug? Is there a way around it other than the use of wmode (and thus, loss of ability to full screen)?
  
  It's really frustrating - full screen is such a good feature, but all the warnings are makes it less usable.
  
  Any help is appreciated.

  Well, the problem is that I had an area of very large document (2000 x 2000) because I mistakenly thought that the canvas (size of the document) should be larger than the largest size possible I would need to use (I am forced to use noscale for this project for a lot of reasons).

  Anyway, I have a solution. Instead of using my settings object/embed 2000 width and height of 2000, I used instead '100% ' for both and then made the very small size of the canvas (1px). I did not know before, now the Player CAN and will display the content outside the size of the canvas, as a 'noscale' is set and width/height is set to 100% of the container it is in.

  So, I changed these things and get my wmode settings, and that solved the problem was to have FireFox. As long as the size of the canvas of the flash animation is small, FireFox is not ignoring overflow: hidden. He did that only when the SWF file was a large canvas size when wmode was not present.

  Thanks for your comments!

• Need help to transform a shape layer in a layer mask blur adjustment

  I understand how to do a blur mask on the image adjustment layer, so it blurs the images below, which is essentially what I'm trying to do, but in this case, I already have the shape layer (or rather imported from Illustrator > converted to a shape layer) and is in a nested composition.

  First of all, is it possible to blur the images of a composition if the adjustment layer is nested in a composition of the child, or the adjustment layer must be in the parent publication; the composition is blurry?

  Second of all, how we simply take a form that they have already created and use that for a mask, in this case, a mask that will blur everything below?

  Forum thanks!

  There are a few things that are not effective in your workflow and your approach.

  Lets talk first about the Illustrator files in After Effects. Firstly, absolutely the only reason you would ever convert a layer to illustrator in a form would be to use animator tools found in the add menu at the top of the shape layer properties in the timeline panel or to animate a Bézier path on this layer. There is no other advantage in converting a vector layer to a shape. NONE.

  Second, if you want to hide an adjustment layer then you can draw the mask directly on the adjustment layer or any layer with transparency, including an illustrator layer, layer photoshop, any hidden layer or layer shape directly on top of the adjustment layer and use this layer with transparency as an Alpha or Alpha reverse cache by approach to the adjustment layer.

  You can use the luminance values of any layer that has no transparency that a luma or reversed hides by luma approach. The white areas offer transparency with luma standard. IOW, if you have a radial with white in the middle and black gradient on the edge and you use a luma matte and white will be transparent on the layer below.

  Standard caches only affects the layer immediately below the source.

  Adjustment effect layers each layer directly under the adjustment layer. Masks and caches can be used to control the effects of an adjustment layer.

  You can also use masks on any layer to control the effect added to this layer if you have a recent version of AE. You will find the option under options to Compositing.

  If you have any layer with transparency or the strong luminance values, you can use Auto Trace to generate a cache for this layer based on transparency or luminance. Any way shape mask or Bézier path can be copied and pasted to another layer.

  We will take your last question now. You should be able to answer. To use any shape you created as a mask, you use this layer as a track matte.

  We will change that approach a bit and assume that you have created a shape layer by using the pen tool or converted an Illustrator layer to a shape. You have a path that you can be found by selecting the shape layer and by pressing twice the key U. find the path you want to copy, rotate options path to reveal animation controls and to set a single keyframe and then copy (Ctrl/Cmnd + c). Even of the forms created with parametric tools like star, ellipse, rectangle can be converted into a path by right-clicking the shape and selecting convert to paths. When you have copied the path put you on the layer where you want to paste the path, select the pen tool to begin to draw a mask, click anywhere on the layer and paste it (ctrl/cmnd + v) and that you have created the mask. This works for forms and masks on any layer.

  Here's a bet to keep everything by copying and pasting masks. The size and position of a path is calculated from the center of the layer and has no relationship to scaling, rotating, or the position of the layer. If you drew a mask on a layer that is resized to 50% and moved to the top right of the comp and rotated 45 ° and then paste this path to any other layer you will NOT get a path in the same position and the same size as the layer sampled in the model. You end up with a path that match if every sampled layer transformation properties have been reset and the layer was at the center of the model and the rotation and scale were normal. You must pay attention to this issue by copying and pasting traces of Bézier.

  I missed a question type. If you nest or call a layer previously and there is an adjustment layer in the main computer it will affect all layers below. If you dial before a layer and a top adjustment layer then only layers in the nested model will be influenced by the adjustment layer.  I replied before but wanted to make sure.

  BE very careful when you watch YouTube tutorials on workflow because a growing number of them is bad teaching techniques and pointing you to the bottom of the dead-end alleys. Make sure you vet your training.

  If you have any other questions the best place to find good community resources is to type a word in the search help field in the upper right of the AE. For example, if you typed layer adjustment or masks, you would find a lot of very good advice on how to use these features.