Breaking point taking up too much time for each step for every time to Jdeveloper 11.1.1.7

Hi all

I use Jdeveloper to ADF application development 11.1.1.7 and I use 64 bit JDK. When I run my application in debug mode, if the program control passes to the location of the breakpoint taking too in time for the next step (F8) a few times because of this I need to restart the server from WL. During this time of progress/loading showing symbol on the screen. I don't know why this is happening... ? Please someone help me on this.

Vinoth-

Try closing the Panel of the Structure of the ADF. I noticed a lot of requres JDev struggle to maintain synchronization with the Structure of the ADF. It helps in the design of JSF page and in brakepoints in support beans and other JSF related classes.

I also had problems with 64 bit JDK on Windows and came back to 32-bit. (do not remember if I had WLS crashes but I know I had a lot of problems)

Try growing JDev memory and heap WLS.

Tags: Java

Similar Questions

  • I signed up for a year of 10 photos per month.  I am connected to adobe. I can't communicate with a real human being. I can't upload a picture to my computer. Mac 10.5.8. desktop computer. It takes too much time.

    I signed up for a year of 10 photos per month.  I am connected to adobe. I can't communicate with a real human being. I can't upload a picture to my computer. Mac 10.5.8. desktop computer. It takes too much time.

    Since this is an open forum, not Adobe support... you must contact Adobe personnel to help

    Chat/phone: Mon - Fri 05:00-19:00 (US Pacific Time)<=== note="" days="" and="">

    Don't forget to stay signed with your Adobe ID before accessing the link below

    Creative cloud support (all creative cloud customer service problems)

    http://helpx.Adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-CCM.html

  • A query that takes too much time with the dates?

    Hello people,
    I'm trying to pull some data using the status date, and for somereason its taking too long to return the data
       and trunc(al.activity_date) = TRUNC (SYSDATE, 'DD') - 1     --If i use this its takes too much time
    
    
      and al.activity_date >= to_date('20101123 000000', 'YYYYMMDD HH24MISS')
       and al.activity_date <= to_date('20101123 235959', 'YYYYMMDD HH24MISS') -- If i use this it returns the data in a second. why is that?
    
    How do i get the previous day without using the hardcoded to_date('20101123 000000', 'YYYYMMDD HH24MISS'), if i need to retrieve it faster??

    It seems that al.activity_date is indexed and is not TRUNC (al.activity_date). Your problem is not with the TRUNC(sysdate,'dd')-1. So use:

    and al.activity_date >= TRUNC(SYSDATE)-1
    and al.activity_date < TRUNC(SYSDATE)
    
  • I removed 3 SP in a continuous effort to 'fix' iexplore.exe to take too much time processor to do everything he does. Now I can't reinstall because of "access denied."

    original title: cannot re - install SP 3

    I removed 3 SP in a continuous effort to 'fix' iexplore.exe to take too much time processor to do everything he does.  Now I can't reinstall because of "access denied."  I have REMOVED all antivirus programs and malware and always get "access denied".  Need help!

    Don B

    Click HERE. Scroll down the page and click on the automated FixIt. Follow the prompts to run it. After that he did try to install the service pack that you downloaded from the source of IT.

  • I have a dell pc n series (Intel core duo) it take too much time starting last I started at 3: 00.

    Original title: problem in multidisciplinary

    I have a dell pc n series (Intel core duo) it take too much time starting last I started at 3 a.m. what will I do?

    you have eliminated the problems of virus/malware?

    have you recently installed on the computer or updated drivers, etc?

    See: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-au/windows/optimize-windows-better-performance#optimize-windows-better-performance=windows-7

  • What I do when I get an error message indicating that my ID adobe was allowed too much time

    What I do when I get an error message indicating that my ID adobe was allowed too much time

    Hi Kjsoden,

    I found a thread that might help you: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/821424

    Let me know if this helped.

    Thank you

    Preran

  • First Pro CS5 taking too much time to comply

    Why Premiere Pro takes too long (over an hour) to "conform" my mp4 files after I import them?

    I swear that he never used for it took long, even if I don't usually upload mp4 files.

    My computer isn't that hot crash (Quad Core Q6600 2.4 GHz) but he never really used to take THAT long.

    This is essentially a function of the speed of the drive.

  • I need to speak to a representative for the problems with having bought and cannot install. Spend too much time trying to solve through this method.

    What number can I reach a representative?

    Hello

    Please contact our support chat for assistance:http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-b.html

    Kind regards

    Florence

  • vCenter takes too much time to respond after the withdrawal of DC?

    It is a weird one and might or might not be related, but I need help.

    Yesterday, I finally had the time to blow up one of my old DCs (leaving other 3 x all global catalogs).   When I tried to take it off I hit the problem where it says

    The operation failed because

    Active Directory domain services could not transfer the remaining data in the directory DC = ForestDnsZone partition, etc...


    Research in this and following the guide here I could change it to a correct domain controller, and then remove all good scheduled class.  Form of share a brief replication error I think it was changes it all seems good.  dcdiags and repadmin checks show everything goes OK then I thought any good.

    But then, a few hours later, I went to connect to vCenter to do something else and I get

    "The server xxxxx was taking too long to respond. (The order has expired because the remote server taking too long to respond.)


    Now, I had not been in vCenter that day but it was fine the day before so I'm not 100% sure if its related or not.  In any case, last night my backups of Veeam while working, took twice as long, but all long worked OK, if something looks upward.   My first thought was SSO was pointing to the deleted domain controller, it was not that I checked this and it shouldn't be anyway that one I removed was only a temp DC anyway.  So this morning, I restarted the VM vCenter and it restarts OK, services start but I cannot yet connect his too long to answer said.  Any ideas?  Is it related to the removal of DC?  Does not see why it would be with the exception of SSO who seems to find but chronology going home.

    What's weird, is that if I try the web client on that a few times, he sits authentication in a long time and then finally allows me in and everything seems fine.  BUT, if say I go to the permissions section and try and add a my domain account, it is right there for a solid 3-5 minutes before completing all of my usernames, so it's out of AD...   You really don't know why he would do this because when I installed vCenter 4 years it's just 2 x DCs, this one I removed yesterday only installed 6-8 months when I was going to upgrade the domain controllers, but never got round to it, so it's just kind of sitting there waiting but I is no longer necessary so he decided to remove.

    For reference, my domain name has 2 x 2003 DCs (DNS, GC etc. which are preferred and secondary), 1 x new 2008 R2 DC, which was OK in a few weeks and the 2008 deleted domain controller.  Also have Exchange 2003 still (going) but touch wood it seems OK as well, all correct DCs and GCs statement.

    vCenter is 5.1 with 3 x 5.1 hosts also running.  vCenter is running on a 2003 R2 x 64 VM with SQL running on the same virtual computer.  DB is about 8 GB and log is 1.5 GB.

    FWIW, I think I found the problem.

    SSO was the basis of my domain name, that she always, but recently our office parent put in place a program called quest address book synchronization, which meant our small estate of 200 users had suddenly and extra few thousands of added entries.  Don't know no why he decided now is the time to break, but change the SSO to watch a smaller ORGANIZATIONAL unit and not the base for the domain DN solved my problem of access.

  • Open with options: I want to add a new application to the list right click on file-&gt; open with and rearrange the list so my search app is first. I know that I can use open with-&gt; other and select any application, but it takes too much time since I u

    I want to add a new application to the list right click on file-> open with

    and also reorder the list so my search app is first / top of the list.

    I know that I can use open with-> other and select any application, but it takes too long I should use my intended application in this way several times a day.

    Basically, I'm looking for a configurable way configure open with, something more to send to Windows.

    Thank you very much for all the advice offered.

    The operating system, not you, not control that open with the menu command.

  • Query to consume too much time.

    Hello
    I use the Release of oracle 10.2.0.4.0 version. I have a query, its takes too long (about 7 minutes) for indexed read. Please help me understand the reason and workaround for same.
      select *
     FROM a,
             b
       WHERE  a.xdt_docownerpaypk = b.paypk
             AND a.xdt_doctype = 'PURCHASEORDER'
             AND b.companypk = 1202829117
             AND a.xdt_createdt BETWEEN TO_DATE (
                                                                 '07/01/2009',
                                                                 'MM/DD/YYYY')
                                                          AND TO_DATE (
                                                                 '01/01/2010',
                                                                 'MM/DD/YYYY')
    ORDER BY a.xdt_createdt DESC;
    
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id  | Operation                      | Name                    | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads  |  OMem |  1Mem | Used-Mem |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                 |                         |      1 |      1 |    907 |00:06:45.83 |   66716 |  60047 |   478K|   448K|  424K (0)|
    |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | a                       |      1 |      1 |    907 |00:06:45.82 |   66716 |  60047 |       |       |          |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                |                         |      1 |      1 |   6977 |00:06:45.64 |   60045 |  60030 |       |       |          |
    |   4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| b                       |      1 |      1 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       4 |      0 |       |       |          |
    |*  5 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_PAYIDENTITYCOMPANY  |      1 |      1 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       3 |      0 |       |       |          |
    |*  6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IDX_XDT_N7              |      1 |   3438 |   6975 |00:06:45.64 |   60041 |  60030 |       |       |          |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    ---------------------------------------------------
    
       2 - filter(("a"."XDT_CREATEDT"<=TO_DATE(' 2010-01-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
                  "a"."XDT_CREATEDT">=TO_DATE(' 2009-07-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')))
       5 - access("b"."COMPANYPK"=1202829117)
       6 - access("XDT_DOCTYPE"='PURCHASEORDER' AND "a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"="b"."PAYPK")
           filter("a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"="b"."PAYPK")
    
    
    32 rows selected.
    
    
    index 'idx_xdt_n7' is on (xdt_doctype,action_date,xdt_docownerpaypk).
    index idx_xdt_n7 details are as below.
    blevel   distinct_keys   avg_leaf_blocks_per_key   avg_data_blocks_per_key   clustering_factor       num_rows 
    3         868840             1                         47                     24020933               69871000
    
    
    But when i am deriving exact value of paypk from table b and applying to the query, its using another index(idx_xdt_n4) which is on index 'idx_xdt_n4' is on (month,year,xdt_docownerpaypk,xdt_doctype,action_date)
    and completes within ~17 seconds. below is the query/plan details.
    
    
      select *
      FROM a
        WHERE a.xdt_docownerpaypk = 1202829132
              AND xdt_doctype = 'PURCHASEORDER'
             AND a.xdt_createdt BETWEEN TO_DATE (
                                                                  '07/01/2009',
                                                                  'MM/DD/YYYY')
                                                           AND TO_DATE (
                                                                  '01/01/2010',
                                                                  'MM/DD/YYYY')
     ORDER BY xdt_createdt DESC;
    
     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id  | Operation                    | Name                    | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads  |  OMem |  1Mem | Used-Mem |
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY               |                         |      1 |   3224 |    907 |00:00:02.19 |    7001 |    339 |   337K|   337K|  299K (0)|
    |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| a                       |      1 |   3224 |    907 |00:00:02.19 |    7001 |    339 |       |       |          |
    |*  3 |    INDEX SKIP SCAN           | IDX_XDT_N4              |      1 |  38329 |   6975 |00:00:02.08 |     330 |    321 |       |       |          |
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    ---------------------------------------------------
    
       2 - filter(("a"."XDT_CREATEDT"<=TO_DATE(' 2010-01-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
                  "a"."XDT_CREATEDT">=TO_DATE(' 2009-07-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')))
       3 - access("a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"=1202829132 AND "XDT_DOCTYPE"='PURCHASEORDER')
           filter(("a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"=1202829132 AND "XDT_DOCTYPE"='PURCHASEORDER'))
    
    
     
    index idx_xdt_n4 details are as below.
    
    blevel   distinct_keys   avg_leaf_blocks_per_key   avg_data_blocks_per_key   clustering_factor       num_rows 
    3         868840             1                         47                     23942833              70224133
    Published by: 930254 on April 26, 2013 05:04

    the first query uses the predicate "XDT_DOCTYPE" = "PURCHASEORDER" to determine the order of the index IDX_XDT_N7, which needs to be scanned, and uses the other predicates to filter most of the index blocks. The second query uses an INDEX SKIP SCAN without consider the first column of the index IDX_XDT_N4 and use the predicates for the following columns ('a'. ("XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"= 1202829132 AND "XDT_DOCTYPE" = "PURCHASEORDER") to get a much more selective access (reading only 330 blocks instead of > 60 K).

    I think that there are two possible options to improve performance:

    1. If the creation of a new index is an option, you can define an index on the table A (xdt_doctype, xdt_docownerpaypk, xdt_createdt)
    2. If the creation of a new index is not an option, you can use an indicator of INDEX SKIP SCAN (INDEX_SS (an IDX_XDT_N4)) to order the CBO to use the second index (without a hint the CBO tends to ignore the possibility of using a SKIP SCAN in a join of NL). But with production advice is rarely a good idea... 11g you could you baselines sql to avoid these indications in the code.

    Concerning

    Martin

  • Too much time in the queue empty in the loop of consumption

    I'm working on a VI used to screen analog converters above temperatures from room temperature to 175 C.  I have it set in place with a producer and a consumer loop.  The loop of producer makes all the measures, while consumer loop allows you to write tests that all measures in a spreadsheet file. There are 23 steps taken and recorded every second.  The test is run for about 60 minutes.

    Initially, I had trouble with data in the queue being lost when I stopped the VI.  I fixed that by ensuring that the queue was completely empty before you stop the VI.  Now my VI will continue to work long after I pressed the stop button.  I let it run for up to an hour and finally abandoned the operation and still lost a large number of measures on the end of the queue.  From my reading on the forums, it's because of the overload to write to a file of measure.  Opening and closing of the file every second is any slowdown.

    I've seen examples of creating a table of measured data and only writing every 100 samples or more.  Can someone help me see how I could implement something like this in my code?  Is there another reason, it takes so long to write all my test data?

    Thank you

    Matt

    You must use the real file i/o functions.  That made the express VI to write files to measure opens the file, writing the data and then close it.  When you do this several times, you get a really slow performance.  If you must open the file before you consumer loop and close it after the loop.  You will then be able to write as much as you want inside the loop.  But now, you need to format the data yourself.

  • Report takes too much time to PROD and ends in a few seconds on UAT

    Hello

    11.2.0.3 Oracle database version

    OS: RHEL 6

    EBS Version 12.1.3

    A strange thing is happening in PROD and CLONED bodies.

    The user triggers a (CRI) and it runs for hours on the PROD instance and ends a few seconds on the UAT.

    > I have checked and found no blockages.

    > Other programs are underway on the PROD, but the difference is much too huge (several hours and seconds).

    > I cannot grant the request using sql tuning advisor as id sql changes dynamically.

    > Despite this I tried tuning, but it errors with timeout (increased from 1800 to 3000) but always gets timeout error.

    Please suggest what else I can check this report?

    Concerning

    Karan


    Problem has been resolved.

    In one of the SR, Oracle had asked to remove the stats on one of the tables GT.

    I had removed the same two weeks ago. UAT clone has been a month and so it reflected there.

    Today, I tried to remember what all has changed have been made and I found that this has been done.

    I collected stats at 100% for this table. The report running for almost 5-6 hours on PROD now complete in just 35 seconds.

    Learning: track the changes make you.

    Concerning

    Karan

  • Import to take too much time

    Hi all
    I'm quite new to database administration.my problem is that I am trying to import the dump file, but one of the table taking too long to import.

    Description:
    1 export source database, which is in character set oracle 8i is WE8ISO8859P1

    2 I take import in 10 g with character set utf character set and 8 national is also the same.

    3 dump file is about 1.5 GB.

    4 I am error value is too large for column while in db target is in utf-8 convert all the coloumn varchar2 to char.

    5 all taking an importation of other tables get very quick bt import in perticular offer very slow EEG

    Please help me thanks in advance...

    Hello

    ORA-06502: PL/SQL: digital or value error: character string buffer too small
    ORA-06512: at the 'SYSADM '. TRGSTMT_KATVERF001IU', line 4
    ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger ' SYSADM. TRGSTMT_KATVERF001IU'

    It seems that something is wrong with the trigger SYSADM. TRGSTMT_KATVERF001IU when you import the Table KATVERFAHREN.

    I do not know your application and what that do trigger (may be it updates another Table).

    But I think that you will have to first ask for developers or support for this application. Can be a variable is declared in this trigger with a data type definition that does not support the change due to the new set of characters ( string too small buffer*).

    It's just a hypothesis.

    Best regards
    Jean Valentine

  • Download XP SP3 takes too much time

    I started to update my computer XP 2004 [Dell latitude C540] download of Service pack 3 16 hours! Since 7 hours dialog box displays "Running process installation af ter" ["finish installation" section]

    It normally takes this long?  If not, what can I do?  Help!

    Thanks for the reply. Although I think I've sorted it, it's good to know that this service works... in case I have problems in the future.

    The firewall was Sophos [expired in March 2011]

    I went to Task Manager and saw that the Explorer was running. When I clicked on 'end process' all again mobile. A dialog box saying that SP3 has been installed.

    How long should it take to download? I assumed that it was taking so long because the computer has never been used on the internet while he was largely obsolete!

    Relating to question 4. It's an old unused computer, I dug into the closet fo to use when my partner commandeer my brand new computer

    [Thanks:] kath

Maybe you are looking for