build the table by concatenating berries 2

Similar Questions

• How can I write time to build the table in just a few seconds?

  Hello world

  I am able to use "elapsed time" to send a time stamp to "build the table" using the output of 'elapsed time to text.  But after 59 seconds, it gives then a minute.  In the excel file, it is as follows:

  0 00:00:59

  0 00:01:00

  0 00:01:01

  I want to continue to 60, 61 seconds and so fourth.  When I try to connect to an another Subvi, it gives me a connection error.  Any help would be greatly appreciated?

  Thank you

  Ferriol

  I guess that's the Express VI, you can use the output of the time elapsed (s) instead of the number of seconds passed.  If you want a string, use the Format String VI, or build an array of DBL to add to the rest of your data.

• build the table when values change at run time

  Hi all

  I have a continuous stream of frequencies that continue to change during execution. I need to make a table of these values. I use the array build function. This option stores the first value only and the order of the day replaces the stored rather than settle down after that. I was going through the examples of labview and I think that by using the shift register can somehow solve this problem. However after an hour of futile play with lag, while loop records and build blocks table that I decided to post on this problem. I would like if someone can delete my concepts as well as a solution. The conceptual linkage is for what the first value to maintains have replaced. If I use the table of generation block the values that come should then fill the following vacant location logically. Instead, it replaces one only.

  You are right that I have simply the case that I warned the first sentence.

  Other methods require a certain amount of planning on the structure of data-handling. It is suggested at least...

  A better approach would be something like a circular buffer where you initialize an array of the desired size (for example 10000 items) and then start to replace the items. You can use the iterator of the loop you have to 'reduce' using quotient & reminder (which is the 'modulo' mathematical operation).

  hope this helps,

  Norbert

• How to build the table with all the combinations of a source table?

  Hello

  I have a 2D array that contains the list of the power user-defined settings. The number of PSs (table rows) is not fixed. For example - 3 PSs:

  Stage of Min Max name

  PS1 3.0 3.6 0.3

  PS2 0.9 1.2 0.1

  PS3 1.7 1.9 0.1

  I need to build, from this list, a table of all the combinations as below:

  PS1 PS2 PS3

  3.0 0.9 1.7

  3.0 0.9 1.8

  3.0 0.9 1.9

  3.0 1.0 1.7

  3.0 1.0 1.8

  3.0 1.0 1.9

  3.0 1.1 1.7

  3.0 1.1 1.8

  3.0 1.1 1.9

  3.0 1.2-1.7

  3.0 1.2-1.8

  3.0 1.2-1.9

  3.3 0.9 1.7

  3.3 0.9 1.8

  3.3 0.9 1.9

  3.3 1.0 1.7

  3.3 1.0 1.8

  3.3 1.0 1.9

  3.3 1.1 1.7

  3.3 1.1 1.8

  3.3 1.1 1.9

  3.3 1.2 1.7

  3.3 1.2 1.8

  3.3 1.2 1.9

  3.6 0.9 1.7

  3.6 0.9 1.8

  3.6 0.9 1.9

  3.6 1.0 1.7

  3.6 1.0 1.8

  3.6 1.0 1.9

  3.6 1.1 1.7

  3.6 1.8 1.1

  3.6 1.1 1.9

  3.6 1.2 1.7

  3.6 1.2 1.8

  3.6 1.2 1.9

  How to build this table programmatically?

  (Note also that the number of rows in the source table is not fixed).

  Thanks in advance!

  Hi Berezka,

  using a magic of automatic indexing:

  

• build the table only if a case structure

  
  

  Hi adamkse,

  Here are a couple of screws for you to watch. I think they both what you want, the second is a better way.

  Notes:

  Enjoy the indexing feature in order to remove the indexing of tables yourself. So you don't have to change for the iterations of the loop if the size of your input array changes.

  You have been reset table "ucodes' each time as the outer loop. Then, which has been corrected.

  The reason why the second vi is better, because a table in a loop construction is generally a bad idea. LabView must make memory allocation as the table grows (does if the picture remains very low). It may take time, so its best to avoid it. First do you the big picture as he possible can get, then replace the elements starting at zero. Keep track of the actual size with a shift register, and then resize the table at the end.

  I hope this helps.

  Steve

• How to convert an array into a cluster of the same type as the one used to build the table previously?

  I have a group of 6 items I need to change in a table for the part of the VI process.  What I can do, but then I need to change in a cluster of the same type to be used elsewhere.  When I change the table in a cluster, I find myself with a cluster of 9 elements, which of course is not compatible!

  I am attaching snapshots of context-sensitive help in the initial cluster, the intermediate table and the final cluster (bad).  Regarding the photos, the length of the 1 d tables and values in their midst are the only subject to change things.

  Please could someone help by suggesting ways to work around this problem.  Thank you

  Please do not post bitmaps by chaning simply .jpg file name extension. Do not change the file type. There is a good reason why the forums software does not bitmaps, and this is because the file sizes are huge.

  To your question: right click on the table of the Cluster service and select 'Size of Cluster' in the context menu to set the size of the cluster of output.

• Build the table to 2 dimensions to plot a graph from UIMessages

  Hello guys,.

  I need some advice, the problem I have is that I want to pass an array [0 5] numbers to my throwugh of custom UI UIMessage to plot a graph with these data in the same grapgh (see the behavior of the 6 signals on the same graph), but so far I could only pass a value and see only a signal in the graph.

  Is there a way to pass the french table UIMessage using the activeXDataParam? Or may be otherwise?

  Thanks for your comments.

  Eder

  I threw together a simple example in TS 2014 and 2014 LV.  I think it does what you want.  Simply run the main vi in the project and select the random sequence file Array.

  In addition, attached is a photo of my UserMessage vi.

  Hope this helps,

• build the table high sampling frequency

  Hello

  I have implemented a simple vi which curve data from incoming analog channels, and when you are prompted to save the data, it generates an arrary. When recording is complete, the data is written to a file. I use a local variable between while loops to add data to table. Everything works smoothly. However, when I increase my sampling rate in a few thousand s/s (> 5000 s/s) my final table is not as large as expected. Suggestions to optimize this? I do not undestand where is the neck of the bottle. In the end, I intend to be sampling 8 channels at least 8 000 s/s. The vi is attached in case someone wants to kick something. LabVIEW is fairly new to me.

  Thank you

  Trevor

  Search for "producer/consumer" and how a queue can be used to transfer data between the loops.

  What is happening is the loop of your is slows and not juggling with incoming data. The local is being written too.

  Put a flag on the terminals of your index fo the two loops to see that a single loop is ahead of the other.

  Ben

  And if you do not belive me just wait a few minutes and crossrulz will tell you the same thing.

• Disable an entry to build the table according to the user input

  Hello

  I'm using labview to perform a mass spectrometer.  I made a program to monitor up to five masses, where it sends mass to mass spec (DAC) and then receives data (analog signal) and the locations / records, it is then repeated for the next four masses before returning to the first.

  I have five controls on the front panel, where the user can enter and then the five masses that they wish to follow.

  My problem is how to disable some of the masses, if I only want to follow masses 1,2,3 or 4 instead of five.  Because obviously, it takes more time to complete each cycle with the masses more.  How can I disable the entries if the user upgrades to zero for example?  Or have a way to control the masses to follow.  Who will stop the five tensions sent through DAC and send only 1,2,3 or 4 depending on what is selected?

  I enclose my vi.

  I don't see a Structure of the event in your vi. It is the best and easiest way to capture the change event and manipulate. Search Help on the Structures of the event and you will find many examples. You need the full version of LabView to have access to the Structure of the event.

• Build the name of guard of the table of the last element, but not the others. Workaround solution?

  Hello

  Sorry if this has been posted before, I did the search first, but can't find anything.

  Problem is that I have two configurations which are identical and must be ordered by a single vi. Given that they are the same, they are configured with the same sets of parameters so I decided to create a cluster of these and then build an array of clusters. In this way I need to use only a thread and if I need a given parameter I can get it easily from here (or so I thought) and also because I need to see if anything changes I can compare a thread instead of each of the parameters.

  The gui has the list of parameters, then in the block diagram I group them appropiately, using "Bundle name" and then each bundle in a table by using "build the table. Problem is when I have the index in the array for the first place of the configuration and usage to unbundle the parameters I need, using "ungroup by name" (although if I use "Unbundle" the same thing happens) and lo and behol, the output names come from the configuration of the second, not the first.

  Here's the curious thing, though, even if the names are all wrong, that the values are correct. I could live with that, but it's more boring it will be another very difficult user to understand the schema more this is just a proof of principle to test with two, eventually there will be eight or more and who's going to get really confusing.

  Is there a way to get around this? Even if it is to change the names after unbundling.

  Check the attached vi to see what I mean.

  I think you forget an important point on the tables.  The only thing that may be different between each element of a table is its value.  The elements in the array must all share the same properties.  This would therefore include the names of the different elements that make up the cluster that is a table element.

  It seems that the last group that builds in the table is the one that defines the names of the items that are in the element of the cluster.  You must give all elements of the array with the same name within the cluster.  Or use a cluster of clusters rather than a table of cluster to create your data structure.

• Splitting the tables in the tables more

  Hello world

  I couldn't find a similar problem on the forum, hency my new post. I have a number of paintings in need of splitting.

  Say I have data stored in 4 tables (or columns), appointed IGS, VGS, VDS and IDS. These four columns each have n * 80 cells, where n is the number of measures. What I want to do is to have the n number of times IGS, CGS, IDS and VDS, where each table is only 80 cells long. Thus, when displayed in Excel for example, the first row would look like:

  IGS VGS IDS VDS VGS ID VDS IGS VGS GHI...

  Thanks a lot for help.

  You can start by finding the size of you individual tables, IGS, CGS, IDS and VDS.  I guess they would be of the same size.  Divide size by 80 and that's your hand for loop index.  Use the subset of table VI and shoot 80 pieces of each array element.  Once you have the 80 item chucks you can set up another loop on the berries and build the table 1 d longer with an Array function construction with a CONCATENATE entry-level feature.  Using shift registers and another function of matrix to build to add the following line in the main table.

  I think that's what you wanted.

• Connecting leads to build the array in a VI script

  Hello

  I'm looking for a way to connect the wires to a knot of "generation table" in a script of VI.

  I have a table of entries that should translate in a table via node 'building the table '. I added successfully to the input terminals for 'building the table' node in a script of VI. However, the program fails when I try to execute a loop to wire all of the entries in the order. The problem is, all the sons of entry to the first element of the' generation '. Snapshot of the code is attached.

  Please suggest me a way to link the different elements at different entrances to the node 'building the table '.

  Thank you.

  Concerning

  HB

  LV12 running at the moment, the fastest to write a small example that so open LV14 and watch your VI.

  

• Insert in the table, the table does not grow

  I'm currently learning Labview 2009.

  Problem:

  I have a chart 2D with 3 columns I initialize outside my main loop.  In my loop, I want to add new lines in the table as I collect the data.  I tried to use "Insert into array" but can't seem to get new lines to add.

  I've attached an example VI to show you what I'm doing.  Basically, I initialize the table outside the loop to 0 rows, 3 columns.  Inside the loop, I look at the number of rows found and then try to insert a 1 d of the 3 column table.

  I am an old VS / encoder VB trying to adapt some skills to Labview.

  The purpose of this table is also to collect temperatures over a period of time and to determine the overall variation over a given period.  Additional ideas would be welcome.

  You can use a shift register and build the table. See attached example

• Insert tables in the tables

  Well, it is a Board problem.  I have an experience that changes the parameter 1 (temp), then parameter change 2 (v) a number of times, with data output.  the process is then repeated.  I would like to get a picture that looks like

  V1 T1 data table

  V2 T1 data table

  V3 T1 data table

  V1 T2 data table

  V2 T2 data table

  V3 T2 data table

  V1 T3 data table

  etc.

  'case 2' is my first attempt at implementation of the table in the data stream to write the file.  Clearly, this does not work and does not the data of the most recent temperature.

  'case 4' is my last attempt.  I enter all the data in a table, but it seems that it is an array of 3 - d when the schema specifies only 2D table.

  The problem is at the end of the block diagram.  Any advice on cleaning the other parts of the program are also accepted (Note: the interface should avoid visa - for reasons that I won't go in).  I'm sure it's a quick fix and thank you for taking the time to help me.

  Some ideas I had, but has failed to implement create a sub-table and inserting them in a main draw (4 cases).  Creation of 2D (outside the cycle of volt) tables and add them.  Insertion of simple elements in arrays of brute force (I know not how to do this, but there must be an easier way, it comes to Labview).

  Maybe you are frustrated to see the table reset with each iteration, showing that the current measure. Shift registers are your solutions:

  

  Of course, as Jorn wrote, if you have a large number of measures you should initialyze the table with the appropriate number and the use of 'replace' instead of 'Building the table', but it seems that this is not your case.

  LVM/TOC files are not Excel files, but can be imported using TDM Excel Add - In. In addition, you can write directly to Excel using automation or screw of Report Generation Toolkit, if you (search in the finder of the example excel).

• Build a table or merging of signals?

  I know that there is more than one way to merge waveform signals to display in a waveform chart. The two that I know are a fusion signal express vi and build the table. But I was wondering which of the two were more effective. I read once somewhere in this forum that this "generation" is one of the tasks much more time.

  Not very critical of what I'm doing (a data acquition loop takes a few milli seconds with table generation) but was just wondering if one or the other has a better way to do it. Or it could both be the same.

  Thank you.

  If I understand correctly, you only build a piece of data in an array of 1 x 1 each time through the loop.  If this is the case, then there is no problem with the way you use table build and build waveform to get your data on the graph with the timestamps of law.  It is perhaps not the most effective approach, but at a rate of 200ms update, you are unlikely to have problems.

  Build problems when you add constantly in an existing table because the table maintains more and needs to be reallocated whenever a new item is added.