ChnList box filter search

Hello

I have 1000 channels, and try to create a search filter to the ChnList box in my dialog box - is this possible?

Thank you

Hi Marville,

I think you absolutely want to stay with the channel list box control.  I suggest that you use programmatically filter shape in the data portal to filter, as this string matching:

Set PortalDisp = Portal.Structure
< your="" filter="" string="" here="">
Call PortalDisp.FilterForm.Expand (1)
FOR each group of Data.Root.ChannelGroups
FOR each channel in Group.Channels
IF (Channel) PortalDisp.IsElementDisplayed THEN
i = i + 1
' add to ChnListBox
' ChnListBox.Items.Add Channel.Name, I
MSG = Msg & Channel.Name & + "\n"
END IF
NEXT "channel
NEXT "group
MsgBox Msg

Brad Turpin

Tiara Product Support Engineer

National Instruments

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • Need to hide options "filter, search and list of exports.

    Hi, we can hide the filter, search and list export options in the user interface. Please see the summary below.

    Hiding.JPG

    You cannot change the user interface for existing objects of vSphere.

    You do not have your own list of objects in support of these options:

    -Sort and export icons will not be displayed if you specify no sortProperty or exportProperty in your list of ColumnDataSourceInfo.

    -The filter box will always be there but will be inactive if your data provider does not support a node PropertyConstraint with Comparator.TEXTUALLY_MATCHES (see example of frame-app)

  • whenever I type in the google box to search for each letter i firefox type which application I would like to use to open this file, this is so embarrassing, how to stop this?

    whenever I type in the google box to search for each letter i firefox type which application I would like to use to open this file, this is so embarrassing, how to stop this?

    You are welcome

    Can you tell us which extension caused your problem?

  • All of a sudden an extra box of 'Search Web' appeared on my firefox under the toolbar above the tab bar and bookmarks. I'm not able to remove it through customize toolbars as you do with all the other icons, etc. Could someone help me?

    This new "Web search" box/bar has a magnifying glass on the left and on the right, just outside the box, there is "- or -". I'm unable to remove or even just move the toolbars, and it does not meet all left or right click. When it appeared everything first, he appeared with the shortcut for Facebook and Twitter icons. It would be really appreciated if someone could help me with removing permanently from the foregoing. I had already tried to remove Firefox from my Mac OS, but when I re - install a new one, all plug-ins, bookmarks, etc are kept. If not, could someone advise me how to do a clean uninstall of Firefox?

    http://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

  • Customize the filter/search text, but display the original text of the research to adf 12.1.3

    After customization of search in the QueryFilterBean text, how always display the original text entered by the user if the results of the table appear.

    It is in the ADF 12.1.3 version. Is this possible?

    You introduce new variables to filter for the entrance of users as is described in this blog https://tompeez.wordpress.com/2015/04/11/how-to-filter-adf-bound-tables-by-date-range-jdeveloper-12-1-x/

    Then read the values of variables in the onQueryListener in your bean method that you introduced in the filter and apply both in terms of filter criteria.

    Timo

  • filter search

    What are all the possible tags to filter the palettes in Adobe Kuler? For example, I can filter by tags when I enter the search bar the following convention:

    Tags: fire (this Adobe Kuler search and display all the palettes of colors associated with the 'fire' tag.)

    Thank you

    Tags are created by the author of the theme.  So, there is really no limit to the words that can be searched using the "tags".

  • Apex 4.1 LDAP auth filter search does not

    Hi, I am creating the authorization with LDAP
    It works with:
    cn=%LDAP_USER%,cn=Users,DC=xxxx,DC=yyyy
    But it's like my cn
    Smith John
    If I want to use my login instead:
    jsmith
    Using apex said that, for the name distinguished not exact it use serarch instead of simple_bind_s so my search filter is:
    (&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=jsmith))
    String of distinguished name (DN) and:
    DC=xxxx,DC=yyyy
    But I still get "Invalid Credentials", same handling with string of distinguished name (DN) (maybe the hard coded to ONE_LEVEL instead subtree search parameters) and setting the value:
    cn=Users,DC=xxxx,DC=yyyy
    Does nothing

    I know that successful bind must be done before research is apex who know?

    It's bug or I'm missing something?

    jareeq wrote:
    @tom
    Thanks for the reply

    but it still does not work

    Using the distinguished name (DN) exact string:

    cn=%LDAP_USER%,cn=Users,dn=xxxx,dn=yyyy
    

    and put:

    Smith John
    

    for connection - works
    but using

    cn=%LDAP_USER%@xxxx.yyyy,cn=Users,dn=xxxx,dn=yyyy
    

    using

    jsmith
    

    -is without work

    Do not use

    cn=%LDAP_USER%@xxxx.yyyy,cn=Users,dn=xxxx,dn=yyyy
    

    but use

    %LDAP_USER%@xxxx.yyyy
    

    apex_ldap will not work because he does things with the OID, which is a problem if you don't use that...
    You can sift through {: identifier of the thread = 2336146} to get an idea of some of the problems there.

  • AD Conector question - filter search

    Hi all!
    I tried to set the search filter custom job 'AD user target Recon ":
    (& (objectClass = user)(title!=xxx))
    but get the error:
    < error > < OIMCP. A/d converters > < BEA-000000 > < javax.naming.directory.InvalidSearchFilterException: invalid attribute description. remaining name ' OU = xxx, DC = yyy, DC = com "."
    I have the connector documentation we have information and examples the use NOT operator, but in my setup it does not work.
    Is - this correct bahavior?
    The best
    MP

    Try this

    (& (objectClass = user) (! title = xxx))

  • Firefox 8 - How to be able to use the address box to search with Google by default?

    The posted instructions did not work... it took me to YouTube... y at - it a string that I use in "keyword.url" that will change the search from address bar of Google instead of Yahoo?

    Thank you very much for the instructions - they worked perfectly.

  • With Firefox 12 I'm impossible to drag-and-drop text in the text boxes or search bars. Is there a way to activate this feature?

    Firefox 11 allowed drag-and - drop text and the other two programs inside the browser itself. in FF12, I can do neither. How to restore this function?

    I had this problem too and couldn't add or move bookmarks either. If you have torbutton add-on installed, try disabling the addon. Perhaps it is caused by another addon

  • Why not Win 7 search easily or reliably find files from subfolder and file specified?

    I've been using Windows for a while now, since version 2.x. I am currently using Windows 7 64 bit. I need to find a file. Not exactly rocket science. Let's say it's fichier.ext. I know that one or more copies of filename.ext reside inside or under C:\folder\subfolder1.

    So I open C:\folder\subfolder1 in Windows File Explorer. I press {COMMAND} + {e} for the search box and type filename.ext, then {ENTER}. The search returns 99 items. Unfortunately, 98 of them are not named fichier.ext. It sucks, but whatever. 98 results for the most part irrelevant are sorted by ascending file name. UH... I know by running DIR/s that there are actually 7 files named filename.ext residing in these subfolders. But Windows 7 search gave only 1 of them. The resolution of the problems of research said that everything was fine. All seem to have file system permissions. So here I am with 1 relevant result and literally 98 irrelevant results. It sucks. The files are not hidden. ATTRIB shows that they hear only the flags of A (rchive). I can find no reason why search gave no relevant results 98, yet returned only 1 of 7 planned relevant results. No, I'm starting to do this just to write a rant on the search for Win 7. I wanted just to finish a task, which would have been relatively easy in all previous versions of Windows, I used.

    Given that the search for C:\folder\subfolder1 does not work, I try searching for C:\. Guess what. 43 items returned, and only 34 of the results are irrelevant. From C:\, search found 7 all the relevant files. It's a Festivus miracle! But how a top-level folder got no less relevant results, but most relevant results doesn't make much sense.

    16% of the relevant results are grouped because they are sorted by filename ascending. Now, the company, right? I want the full path and the name of each of the 7 compliant files that I know exist. Who do not ask too, right? Except that there is no way to copy the text in the column of the file. And the text in the folder column is absurd anyway. The folder column shows "subfolder5 (C:\Folder\Subfolder1\Subfolder2\Subfolder3\Subfolder4). Why on Earth is subfolder5 on the left? And there is no place I can copy the path. OK, no problem, I'll just do a right click and open the file location. In fact I use {SHIFT} + {F10}, {i} instead of Right-Click, but it's because I have old habits when there was usually effective ways of doing things in Windows using the keyboard.

    Thus, opens the folder containing my first relevant result. {ALT} + {d} which brings me to the address bar, where I already have the full path. Now I just type "\" and the first characters of the file name and it completes automatically. {COMMAND} + {a}, {COMMAND} + {c} and it is all copied to the Clipboard. Yay, I got my first string path\filename successfully, so I can really accomplish something. I launch an instance of Notepad and paste it in for later use. Now back to my remaining 6 to search relevant results... Hmmm... {ALT} + {left} does nothing. Focus changes often without apparent reason in Win 7 files and the Search Explorer, which prevents the work strikes. So I move the mouse and click the left arrow to go back to my 6 other relevant results. That's when I find that search threw all the results. I have to wait while it does search through each file under C:\. Ugh.

    In an effort to avoid having to search several times C:\ 5 times more unnecessarily for fichier.ext, I'm thinking maybe I can click the button start and try to type here, let semi-automatic paths as I type the content of the column of the file. It does not, because the start menu obscures my 7 relevant results. I later I knew that even if they are hidden, I could select the relevant 7 of 99 total results and the selection color stick while the start menu hidden items in the name column. But in the end, the fastest way to get the 7 paths was actually copy via the mode prompt QuickEdit on DIR /S FILENAME command. Results of the EXT. I mean, really?

    Windows search cannot locate surely known names of files in a subfolder that is known? Win7 search not only gave me 98 irrelevant results, but also failed to find 6 of the 7 specified files. How screwed is that? But DIR/s gave me no irrelevant results at all and find files with 100% reliability. Does this strike anyone as being a little... uh... bad?

    Find names of files specified in a specified subfolder does not appear as a rare user scenario. Simply how to find a record of a known file in a known subfolder name seems ridiculously too complicated in Windows 7.

    Now, there is a _ a lot of good things on Win 7. My favorite features are probably support for multiple processors, accident of insulation, and the incredible improvements in design and material compatibility layer makes this Win 3.x prey. But please, I seriously hope that someone will take a look at some of the pieces of this real scenario common and try to improve things in a future service pack or something? Pretty please?

    Noel, thanks for the great suggestion! I * never * would have discovered the ' file name: ' filter with the help of Windows.

    I had no idea that there was a search syntax. It seems totally weird to me that the add a drop-down list box filter search doesn't give IU for update and size filters. I think that corresponding filename deserves its own button there and something to direct users to this overview of query language syntax.

    It's really great to know adding "leader:" to restrict the results to only compliant file names. I am completely floored that it is completely impossible. I would * NEVER * have discovered that the link of query syntax. There is no link between the search Help topics. Windows Search 4.0 is somewhat a component name internally. As an end-user of Windows 7, I consider that the search for files to be an integral part of the operating system. I would have never thought to search for help on "Windows Search 4.0". FYI - I just went to the research, a help file topic or a folder and a suggestion to make a link to the news of search query to win 4 left.

    I fiddled with the columns, remove the folder column and replacing it with the much more logical folder path column. I was happy to find that the next time I opened a search for C:\, the path of the folder column persisted.

    When I search libraries, I have the search box offers some filters, like, Date of modification, Type, name, path, Tags. This never was told to the "queue:" filter that I needed. The "name:" filter only appears when searching for my libraries, do not then the research to another part of my drive. Research on "name:filename.ext" returns all files where {(extention == «ext») & (filename contains "filename")}, for example, returns 'fu_filename.ext', 'filename_bar.ext', 'fu_filename_bar.ext', etc.

    In the results, the context menu doesn't give me a copy as path option. The closest I can find is going to file properties, I can manually copy the contents of the location.

    Rest of questions that I hope THAT MSFT would consider to improve:

    1. "file name:" filter is totally impossible, causing in search of filename otherwise quick to take minimum two times longer, useless due to analysis of the content of the file.

    2. DIR /S C:\FILENAME. EXT runs twice faster than Win with essential Search but impossible ' file name: ' filter, often up to 8 times faster than without the discoverable ' filename: ' filter.

    3. DIR /S C:\FILENAME. POST do not clutter results with files whose content contains the string.

    4. DIR /S C:\FILENAME. Reliable EXT returns all the relevant results.

    5. I can copy each path of results returned by DIR /S C:\FILENAME. POST in a single step (with QuickEdit active guest).

    It's not too terribly demanding to expect a file search v7 o/s to at least on par with the performance and ease of use of a query of type MS-MS-DOS age 30 is?

  • I want to search for messages, but the search box wants rather Google search!

    In Xubuntu 14.04 24.5.0 Thunderbird. Your help indicates that the research above the filter box will search for messages but mine happens only with a Google search on the web!

    When you type less than 3 characters in the search box, the option is to Google search. Less than 4 characters, the options are Google and the corresponding entries in the address book. Less than 5 and the options include "the Messages mentioning: asdf" and Google. For example, you must enter a string of at least 4 characters.

  • How to add the option to search (filter) to my existing code?

    Hello

    The following code works fine. I want to just add a text box to search for the item in the huge list. Please help me in this regard. I would like to pay in return for any help & support because I am in urgent need of this code (I am from INDIA).

    [code]

    Import fl.data.DataProvider;
    Import fl.controls.dataGridClasses.DataGridColumn;
    import flash.events.Event;
    import flash.net.URLRequest;
    Import fl.events.ListEvent;


    var COL_SLNO:DataGridColumn = new DataGridColumn("SL_NO");
    myGrid.addColumn (COL_SLNO);
    COL_SLNO. Width = 40


    var COL_DATE:DataGridColumn = new DataGridColumn("DATE");
    myGrid.addColumn (COL_DATE);
    COL_DATE.width = 130


    var COL_PDFURL:DataGridColumn = new DataGridColumn("FILE_NAME");
    myGrid.addColumn (COL_PDFURL);
    COL_PDFURL.sortOptions = Array.NUMERIC;
    COL_PDFURL. Width = 195


    var allDatabase:Array = [] ;// contains all users as in xml
    var currentDatabase:Array = [] ;// contains users that should be displayed


    var _loader:URLLoader = new URLLoader();
    var _data:XML = new XML();


    _loader.addEventListener (Event.COMPLETE, readXML);
    _loader. Load (new URLRequest("EHSSDocs/Database.xml"));


    function readXML(event:Event):void
    {
    _data = new XML (event.target.data);
    for each (var in _data.user usr)
    {
    allDatabase.push ({id: usr.@id, SLNO: usr.@SLNO, DATE: usr.@DATE, PDFURL: usr.@PDFURL});
    }
    currentDatabase = allDatabase.concat ();
    updateList();
    }


    function updateList (): void
    {
    myGrid.dataProvider = new DataProvider ();


    for (var i: int = 0; i < currentDatabase.length; i ++)
    {
    myGrid.addItem ({SL_NO: currentDatabase [i].}) SLNO, DATE: currentDatabase [i]. DATE, file name: currentDatabase [i]. PDFURL});
    }


    myGrid.addEventListener (Event:ListEvent.ITEM_CLICK, gridItemClick);
    myGrid.addEventListener (ListEvent.ITEM_CLICK, gridItemClick);
    function gridItemClick (e:ListEvent): void
    {
    var urlR:URLRequest = new URLRequest (e.target.getItemAt (e.rowIndex). FILE_NAME)
    navigateToURL (urlR, "_blank");
    }
    }

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

    I hope that the following code may solve the problem. But do not know how to edit because I am recovering data using the XML file.

    [code]

    var itemTextInput:TextInput = new TextInput();
    itemTextInput.move (10, 10);
    itemTextInput.addEventListener (Event.CHANGE, changeHandler);
    addChild (itemTextInput);


    function changeHandler(event:Event):void {}
    var arr:Array = dp.toArray ();
    var filteredArr:Array = arr.filter (filterDataProvider);
    myGrid.dataProvider = new DataProvider (filteredArr);
    }


    function filterDataProvider(obj:Object,_idx:int,_arr:Array):Boolean {}
    var txt1:String = itemTextInput.text;
    var txt2:String = obj.item.substr (0, txt1.length);
    If (txt1.toLowerCase () is {txt2.toLowerCase ()})
    Returns true;
    }
    Returns false;
    }

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    to start, you need to import a TextInput component in your library and your code.

    Next, you need to define RFP and change of position in the filter function to match one of your column names (IE, the one that you want to filter).

    [code]

    Import fl.data.DataProvider;
    Import fl.controls.dataGridClasses.DataGridColumn;
    import flash.events.Event;
    import flash.net.URLRequest;
    Import fl.events.ListEvent;

    var COL_SLNO:DataGridColumn = new DataGridColumn("SL_NO");
    myGrid.addColumn (COL_SLNO);
    COL_SLNO. Width = 40

    var COL_DATE:DataGridColumn = new DataGridColumn("DATE");
    myGrid.addColumn (COL_DATE);
    COL_DATE.width = 130

    var COL_PDFURL:DataGridColumn = new DataGridColumn("FILE_NAME");
    myGrid.addColumn (COL_PDFURL);
    COL_PDFURL.sortOptions = Array.NUMERIC;
    COL_PDFURL. Width = 195

    var allDatabase:Array = [] ;// contains all users as in xml
    var currentDatabase:Array = [] ;// contains users that should be displayed

    var _loader:URLLoader = new URLLoader();
    var _data:XML = new XML();

    _loader.addEventListener (Event.COMPLETE, readXML);
    _loader. Load (new URLRequest("EHSSDocs/Database.xml"));

    function readXML(event:Event):void
    {
    _data = new XML (event.target.data);
    for each (var in _data.user usr)
    {
    allDatabase.push ({id: usr.@id, SLNO: usr.@SLNO, DATE: usr.@DATE, PDFURL: usr.@PDFURL});
    }
    currentDatabase = allDatabase.concat ();
    updateList();
    }

    function updateList (): void
    {
    myGrid.dataProvider = new DataProvider ();<- i="" don't="" see="" where="" this="" does="">

    for (var i: int = 0; i
    {
    myGrid.addItem ({SL_NO: currentDatabase [i].}) SLNO, DATE: currentDatabase [i]. DATE, file name: currentDatabase [i]. PDFURL});
    }

    var dp:DataProvider = myGrid.dataProvider; //<- import="" this="">

    myGrid.addEventListener (Event:ListEvent.ITEM_CLICK, gridItemClick);
    myGrid.addEventListener (ListEvent.ITEM_CLICK, gridItemClick);
    function gridItemClick (e:ListEvent): void
    {
    var urlR:URLRequest = new URLRequest (e.target.getItemAt (e.rowIndex). FILE_NAME)
    navigateToURL (urlR, "_blank");
    }
    }

    --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------

    [code]

    var itemTextInput:TextInput = new TextInput();  Add to your library and import the class
    itemTextInput.move (10, 10);
    itemTextInput.addEventListener (Event.CHANGE, changeHandler);
    addChild (itemTextInput);

    function changeHandler(event:Event):void {}
    var arr:Array = dp.toArray ();
    var filteredArr:Array = arr.filter (filterDataProvider);
    myGrid.dataProvider = new DataProvider (filteredArr);
    }

    function filterDataProvider(obj:Object,_idx:int,_arr:Array):Boolean {}
    var txt1:String = itemTextInput.text;
    var txt2:String = obj.item.substr (0, txt1.length);  change element to match one of your column names
    If (txt1.toLowerCase () is {txt2.toLowerCase ()})
    Returns true;
    }
    Returns false;
    }

  • AF:table with the search query present bindvariable name in the filter text field

    I created a simple display with a criterion of the view object. The criteriy defines a group with 4 criteria. Each element of the criteria has a STARTSWITH operator and compare a column to a binding parameter. The binding variable is marked as optional.
    Then I move the data control named on my page and selected criteria "Read - Only ADF filtered table"

    When the page is displayed to the user, I had the table containing the search field in the header.
    Unfortunately, the entry to the filter of the table fields are not empty, but containing the name of the connection variable.

    text in a filter for GebeCode: VarGebeCode *.
    text in a filter for NiedCode: VarNiedCode *.
    ...

    When the user just wants to filter on a property, for example GebeCode, the user must
    (1) type in the GebeCode
    (2) delete the input for other filter box filter: NiedCode,...
    Step 2 is heavy, but if the user does not specify an empty text in the filter, no lines are selected in the query.

    1 question
    How can I get the boxes of entry filter empty the first time the page is loaded?

    2 question
    As see you in the criteria listed below, I put the box "Ignoe box" (-> UpperColumns = '1') to make my case insensitive search.
    How ever, it does not work: it is always case sensitive.

    How can I get the framework to do things?


    It is the resuling query where clause:
     ( ( ( UPPER(MITA_NAME_VORNAME_CODE) LIKE UPPER( :VarMitaNameVornameCode || '%')  )  OR  ( :VarMitaNameVornameCode IS NULL ) ) 
    AND ( ( UPPER(MITA_CODE) LIKE UPPER( :VarMitaCode || '%')  )  OR  ( :VarMitaCode IS NULL ) ) 
    AND ( ( UPPER(GEBE_CODE) LIKE UPPER( :VarGebeCode || '%')  )  OR  ( :VarGebeCode IS NULL ) ) 
    AND ( ( UPPER(NIED_CODE) LIKE UPPER( :VarNiedCode || '%')  )  OR  ( :VarNiedCode IS NULL ) ) ) 
    Code MitarbeiterViewRVOCriteria
      <ViewCriteria
        Name="MitarbeiterViewRVOCriteria"
        ViewObjectName="model.mitarbeiterDetails.view.MitarbeiterViewRVO"
        Conjunction="AND">
        <Properties>
          <CustomProperties>
            <Property
              Name="displayOperators"
              Value="InAdvancedMode"/>
            <Property
              Name="autoExecute"
              Value="false"/>
            <Property
              Name="allowConjunctionOverride"
              Value="true"/>
            <Property
              Name="showInList"
              Value="true"/>
            <Property
              Name="mode"
              Value="Basic"/>
          </CustomProperties>
        </Properties>
        <ViewCriteriaRow
          Name="vcrow12"
          UpperColumns="1">
          <ViewCriteriaItem
            Name="MitaNameVornameCode"
            ViewAttribute="MitaNameVornameCode"
            Operator="STARTSWITH"
            Conjunction="AND"
            Value=":VarMitaNameVornameCode"
            IsBindVarValue="true"
            Required="Optional"
            UpperColumns="1"/>
          <ViewCriteriaItem
            Name="MitarbeiterViewRVOCriteria_vcrow12_MitaCode"
            ViewAttribute="MitaCode"
            Operator="STARTSWITH"
            Conjunction="AND"
            Value=":VarMitaCode"
            IsBindVarValue="true"
            Required="Optional"
            UpperColumns="1"/>
          <ViewCriteriaItem
            Name="MitarbeiterViewRVOCriteria_vcrow12_GebeCode"
            ViewAttribute="GebeCode"
            Operator="STARTSWITH"
            Conjunction="AND"
            Value=":VarGebeCode"
            IsBindVarValue="true"
            Required="Optional"
            UpperColumns="1"/>
          <ViewCriteriaItem
            Name="NiedCode"
            ViewAttribute="NiedCode"
            Operator="STARTSWITH"
            Conjunction="AND"
            Value=":VarNiedCode"
            IsBindVarValue="true"
            Required="Optional"
            UpperColumns="1"/>
        </ViewCriteriaRow>
      </ViewCriteria>
    Edited by: Stefan1979 the 06.11.2009 20:45

    Hello

    the case sensitive search is controlled by the 'filterFeatures' on the af: column. Due to a bug that is fixed in the next Patch set 1 of JDeveloper 11 g R1, that the search is always case-sensitive.

    Frank

  • How can I do the quick filter Toolbar NOT search in type-I?

    Research during the strike makes it extremely slow search. I would prefer if it seeks ONLY when I hit enter and NOT while I type.

    https://support.Mozilla.org/en-us/KB/quick-filter-toolbar

    There is no way I know of to freeze the quick filter search until you press ENTER.
    It dynamically adjusts the list according to what has been entered, and how broad you are looking.

    TB built in functionality 'search Messages... " you wait for you to press on enter. You can search for a single file, or the parent folder and all its subfolders. It uses the same list of filter as the message filter criteria.
    "Edit - Find -"Find Messages... ', or
    Right-click any folder in the folders pane, and select 'search Messages... »

Maybe you are looking for

  • Facebook Desktop notifications

    Given the previous questions with the same topic with no response says. So I ask you once again. El Capitan 10.11.5 OSX Mid-2015 15 "MacBook Pro / 2.5 GHz i7 / 512GB / 16 GB of RAM I do absolutely no notification from facebook on my desktop. I'm corr

  • Installing XP on Satellite P300 - 18 M - BSOD

    Hi guys,. problematic BSOD during XP installation (you want to rid the Vista laptop of course). BSOD 0x7B / 0034, making allusion to the missing SATA drivers I guess? OK, so the fact that follows: dl the pack of ATI XP drivers for this laptop, found

  • Win XP / Word 2000 for Win 7 / Word2010 transfer

    Hello everyone, I have a list of things on a diskette, 93 KB in size. My previous (8100?) Dimension running XP Home Edition, the MS Word 2000 using the extension. doc. My 2010 Studio XPS 8100 running the version of Home Premium 64 - bit Win 7. even i

  • WinDbg.exe requires the .natvis file

    I'm reading the .dmp files that I get from program crashes and everywhere where I look online told me that the tool of go - to for this task is windbg. I have windbg installed but now I find to complain that it cannot find all the files ".natvis" whe

  • Can I deploy WebWorks app on several private aircraft?

    Hey! Sorry for the noob question... I'm new on this. I developed an application of training, and I don't want to put it on App world. I want to just deploy in about 10 PlayBooks. How / can I do? Thank you.