"" Cisco ASA multiple defects remote control let users deny Service and bypass the security controls ".

Similar Questions

• You are looking for a way to set permissions of files on a folder so that users can view and copy the files out, but may not change the original file in the folder.

  You are looking for a way to set permissions of files on a folder so that users can view and copy the files out, but may not change the original file in the folder.  They will have to copy the files in the folder to make changes and then copy a review of back in.  Locally and on the network

  Hello

  1. In Windows Explorer, right-click the file or folder you want to work with.

  2. In the context menu, select properties and then in the Properties dialog box, click the Security tab.

  3. In the name list box, select the user, contact, computer, or group to which you want to display permissions. If the permissions are grayed out, this means that the permissions are inherited from a parent object.

  https://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727008.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396

• Activate the user audit logs and hide the other audit logs account system on computers in a domain by using Group Policy

  Hello

  Please could someone advise me on how to activate the user audit logs and hide the other audit logs account system on computers in a domain by using Group Policy. Your help would be much appreciated.

  Kind regards

  RocknRollTim

  Hello

  Please contact Microsoft Community.

  We have a specific forum for the computers in the domain and they are experts in this field of investigation and would be in a better position to address the concerns. So refer to the link below and post your query on the TechNet Forums.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  I hope this helps. If you have any questions on Windows, please answer. We will be happy to help you.

• The user profile service is not the user of the sign-in profile cannot be loaded

  Hello. Can someone please help me urgently? My laptop is running windows 8. When I start it up and get the sign in the menu and try to connect, it says "the user profile service is not the user of the sign-in profile cannot be loaded. I saw a lot of people say to go in safe mode or use the admin account but I can't access the desktop computer or whatever it is. When I try pressing F2 repeatedly, it brings me to this menu (I think it is the BIOS, I'm not sure). I don't know what to press on it. I just reset my laptop, or something like that. Someone has an idea?

  I have the same problem with a Lenovo ThinkPad. I had to call Lenovo and pay $40 for a reinstall of the operating system drive.  I had to pay because the laptop is more than 1 year and out of warranty.  I'm always looking for options to repair the laptop before using it on Reset it which will scan all hard disk. Refreshing, it will also remove a lot of programs after the purchase.

• I have first items 13, recently installed on a new laptop of Dell Inspiron 17 5000 Series. The program works very well. However, when I have access to the program, I get a message that there is an update available, 13.1. I let you go ahead and do the upda

  I have first items 13, recently installed on a new laptop of Dell Inspiron 17 5000 Series. The program works very well. However, when I have access to the program, I get a message that there is an update available, 13.1. I let him go ahead and do the update before using the program. It only updated, then restarts first elements 13. As soon as the program loads, I again get the message that 13.1 update is available. How to stop the happy ground?

  RTA,

  Thank you very much for your answers. As you suggest, I went to the help/updates and found that 3 points were scored update, Manager, 13 Photoshop and first elements 13 elements. On a hunch, instead uncheck one of them, I thought I'd see what would happen to let update all 3. It took a while, but, long story short, stopped the happy Vangogh and everything seems fine. Thank you for your messages, much appreciated.    Walt Maken

• user profile service does not the logon, user profile cannot be loaded

  I can't login under my user profile.  It's the administrator user.  I can log in as another user, but can't access my files.  Someone who has had this problem and found a solution, please let me know how they did it?  I read through many answers and don't know which way to go.

  ·                        Restore point:

  Try typing F8 at startup and in the list of Boot selections, select Mode safe using ARROW top to go there > and then press ENTER.

  Try a restore of the system once, to choose a Restore Point prior to your problem...

  Click Start > programs > Accessories > system tools > system restore > choose another time > next > etc.
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  If the above does not work:

  ·                        http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/130095-user-profile-service-failed-logon-user-profile-cannot-loaded.html

  See if the information in the above tutorial will help you.

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-AU/help/769495bf-035C-4764-A538-c9b05c22001e1033.mspx

  Difficulty of a corrupted user profile

  After creating the profile, you can copy the files from the existing profile. You must have at least three user accounts on the computer to perform these operations, including the new account that you created.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• The user profile Service and the user profile cannot be loaded

  My Windows Vista has just received an automatic update online.  Now I can login to my administrator account more.  I get two error messages) 1 the user profile Service does not logon and the user profile 2) cannot be loaded.

  I can sign in as a guest, but I don't see any of my documents and files as they are accessible only when I log in under my logon administrator... Help

  Try this:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/947215

  "A programmer is just a tool that converts the caffeine in code" Deputy CLIP - http://www.winvistaside.de/

• The user profile Service failed - all the usual bugs do not work

  I have Windows 7 family on a Lenovo laptop and received the 'User profile on logon Service failed' message when you try to connect.  I have only one profile and that you do not have a backup disk.  There is also no set restore point.  I can access the Safe Mode tried all of the fixes that have been previously published on this issue, but no change, I can't still connect in all but safe mode and any changes such as the removal of the user account and create a new one that takes place is safe mode affects the normal connection the same user apparently damaged, the same message profile.  What can I do else? Windows 7 can be reinstalled in safe mode, I have a disc from another laptop?

  I had to throw in the towel and wipe the computer and reinstall Windows. Punishment for not having a back-up or an administrator account.

• the user's selection by setting the security filter in the ASO to unsort database

  We found a very annoying feature of Essbase: when we make the security filter setting in the ASO database through the console of Regional service, we found that the selection of the user list is not sorted. It is very very difficult to identify the appropriate user name to set the security filter.
  
  All the tips and tricks can improve the process?

  I don't think that this problem is related to ASO - filters are filters.

  All you need to do to sort the column filters is to change the filters, then click on the column heading "name of the filter. It sorts fine in the EE 9.3.1.

  Kind regards

  Cameron Lackpour

• Multiple messages while trying to change the attributes of the user, check service cannot resolve the identity of the user

  Hello

  When you try to modify a user, I got this message. It's not compatible but it appeared second time while I captured a screenshot.

  
  

  

  What could be the problem here. Please suggest

  Thank you

  EXTWEBLOGIC was in a disabled in IMO State because it was the date of expiry.

  Now we are not the problem now.

  Thank you

• How can I keep the active profile so that it will not be closed by the user profile service and crash my application?

  I'm a 1530 entry in the event log of user profile for a custom .net application service that is managed by a scheduled task (non-interactive) followed an appcrash for my request entry. The application performs a treatment and if it is impossible to delete some files because of the activity of the user will sleep for a few minutes before trying again. It is usually during this period of sleep that I have noticed this issue. It's on a Windows Server 2008 R2 computer.

  Hello

  The question you posted would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winservergen/threads

  I hope this information is useful.

• Disable users to download and install the files?

  After you create the user accounts standard on Windows 7, how to put their account if they cannot download files or install or use executable files.

  Just try to stop files to be downloaded and better protect against viruses and other unwanted threats.

  Thank you

  In the standard user account, users can NOT install anything because the facility, they would need admin right.

  They can still download but you can stop using Group Policy as mentioned.

  AppLocker is also advised to do, it's in the Group also policy.

• How to allow users to sign and return the forms fillable

  Hello

  I completed a form to complete with a signature box (it is a registration form) to send to the users. I got responses that say (based on the extended rights) that the form can be completed and saved but not signed or signed and completed but not recorded.

  is it possible to have the form completed, signed and returned.

  My apologies if I'm missing something really obvious.

  Thank you

  (should mention I use convert function Echosign, but some fields have javascript that is not sopported after conversion).

  It should be, since compatible with Acrobat Pro documents will be signed digitally sign digital applied right use, allowing player.

• Cisco ASA 5505 unable to access the remote network

  Hello

  I have a Cisco ASA 5505, with 50 basic license, which is connected directly to the Modem cable with a public IP address. I have configured and active VPN on the outside interface. When connect us, we connect well without error, but we are not able to access all the resources on the remote network.

  ASA IOS version 8.2 (5)

  Remote IP network: 10.0.0.0/24

  VPN IP Pool: 192.168.102.10 - 25

  I have attached the config: llc.txt

  Please let me know if you have any questions.

  Thank you!

  Hello

  Try adding NAT 0 because inside subnet--> subnet distance

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list TEST

  TEST access ip 10.0.0.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.102.10 255.255.255.224

  HTH

  MS

• VPN Cisco ASA 5540 L2L - one-way traffic only for the pair to a network

  Hello

  I'm a little confused as to which is the problem. This is the premise for the problem I have face.

  One of our big clients has a Cisco ASA5540 (8.2 (2)) failover (active / standby). Early last year, we have configured a VPN from Lan to Lan to a 3rd party site (a device of control point on their end). He worked until early this week when suddenly the connection problems.

  Only 1 of the 3 networks the / guests can access a remote network on the other side. 2 others have suddenly stopped working. We do not know of any change on our side and the remote end also insists that their end configurations are correct (and what information they sent me it seems to be correct)

  So essentially the encryption field is configured as follows:

  access-list line 1 permit extended ip 10.238.57.21 host 10.82.0.202 (hitcnt = 2)
  access-list line 2 extended permit ip 10.207.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 (hitcnt = 198)
  access-list line 3 extended permit ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 (hitcnt = 173)

  Free NAT has been configured as follows (names modified interfaces):

  NAT (interface1) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-VPN-SHEEP

  the INTERIOR-VPN-SHEEP line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  permit for Access-list SHEEP-VPN-INSIDE line lengthened 2 ip host 10.238.57.21 10.82.0.202

  NAT (interface2) 0-list of access VPN-SHEEP

  VPN-SHEEP line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.207.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252

  After the problem started only 10.207.0.0/16 network connections worked for the site remote 10.82.0.200/30. All other connections do not work.

  There has been no change made on our side and on the side remote also insists there has been no change. I also checked how long the ASAs have been upward and how long the same device has been active in the failover. Both have been at the same time (about a year)

  The main problem is that users of the 10.231.191.0/24 cant access remote network network. However, the remote user can initiate and implement the VPN on their side but usually get any return traffic. Ive also checked that the routes are configured correctly in the routers in core for the return of their connections traffic should go back to the firewall.

  Also used of "packet - trace" event raising the VPN tunnel (even if it passes the phases VPN). For my understanding "packet - trace" alone with the IP source and destination addresses must activate the VPN connection (even if it generates no traffic to the current tunnel).

  This is printing to the following command: "packet - trace entry interface1 tcp 10.231.191.100 1025 10.82.0.203 80.

  Phase: 1
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Implicit rule
  Additional information:
  MAC access list

  Phase: 2
  Type: FLOW-SEARCH
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  Not found no corresponding stream, creating a new stream

  Phase: 3
  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH
  Subtype: entry
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  in 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 outside

  Phase: 4
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype: Journal
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Access-group interface interface1
  access-list extended allow ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  Additional information:

  Phase: 5
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 6
  Type: INSPECT
  Subtype: np - inspect
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the http
  global service-policy global_policy
  Additional information:

  Phase: 7
  Type: FOVER
  Subtype: Eve-updated
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 8
  Type: NAT-FREE
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 outside 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  Exempt from NAT
  translate_hits = 32, untranslate_hits = 35251
  Additional information:

  -Phase 9 is a static nat of the problem to another network interface. Don't know why his watch to print.

  Phase: 9
  Type: NAT
  Subtype: host-limits
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  static (interface1, interface3) 10.231.0.0 10.231.0.0 255.255.0.0 subnet mask
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.0.0 255.255.0.0 interface3 all
  static translation at 10.231.0.0
  translate_hits = 153954, untranslate_hits = 88
  Additional information:

  -Phase 10 seems to be the default NAT for the local network configuration when traffic is to the Internet

  Phase: 10
  Type: NAT
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT (interface1) 5 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 outside of any
  dynamic translation of hen 5 (y.y.y.y)
  translate_hits = 3048900, untranslate_hits = 77195
  Additional information:

  Phase: 11
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: encrypt
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 12
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 13
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 14
  Type: CREATING STREAMS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  New workflow created with the 1047981896 id, package sent to the next module

  Result:
  input interface: interface1
  entry status: to the top
  entry-line-status: to the top
  output interface: outside
  the status of the output: to the top
  output-line-status: to the top
  Action: allow

  So, basically, the connection should properly go to connect VPN L2L but yet is not. I tried to generate customer traffic of base (with the source IP address of the client network and I see the connection on the firewall, but yet there is absolutely no encapsulated packets when I check "crypto ipsec to show his" regarding this connection VPN L2L.) Its almost as if the firewall only transfers the packets on the external interface instead of encapsulating for VPN?

  And as I said, at the same time the remote end can activate the connection between these 2 networks very well, but just won't get any traffic back to their echo ICMP messages.

  access-list extended allow ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.231.191.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.82.0.200/255.255.255.252/0/0)
  current_peer: y.y.y.y

  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
  #pkts decaps: 131, #pkts decrypt: 131, #pkts check: 131
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, comp #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
  success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
  Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  If it was just a routing problem it would be a simple thing to fix, but it is not because I can see the connection I have to confirm it by the router base on the firewall, but they don't just get passed on to the VPN connection.

  Could this happen due to a bug in the Software ASA? Would this be something with Checkpoint VPN device? (I have absolutely no experience with devices of control point)

  If there is any essential information that I can give, please ask.

  -Jouni

  Jouni,

  8.2.4.1 is the minimum - 8.2.4 had some issues (including TCP proxy).

  If this does not resolve the problem - I suggest open TAC box to get to the bottom of this ;-)

  Marcin