Cisco ASA ruled out a specific ip address of the split tunneling

Similar Questions

• How to add an external IP address to a split tunnel?

  Hello

  I've set up VPN access on my ASA box as customers use a split tunnel so that only on our internal network traffic through the tunnel. Now, I need to add an external IP address to this tunnel. Is this possible, and if so, how can I achieve that? Just add the address to the list of tunnel network does not; If I do this, the client cannot connect to the external address at all.

  Can anyone help?

  Cheers, Georg.

  Hello

  Will need to see some configurations.

  Usually incoming VPN traffic bypasses ACL interface. If you have the default setting, you will need to allow traffic to the pool/subnet VPN server. Unless of course the server already has a rule that allows traffic to a "some" source address.

  Also a likely problem may be your NAT configuration.

  The local IP address of the server the public IP address is included in the current NAT0 configurations for the VPN connection? If yes then which will probably cause problems for connections to its public IP address. Traffic could be abandoned due to a RPF NAT audit that basically checks the NAT that corresponds to the traffic in the opposite direction.

  Therefore to confirm the above things, or share configurations, then we can do it.

  To my knowledge by adding the address IP of the Split tunnel should naturally also be taken.

  EDIT: The number of the station 6000

  -Jouni

• Cisco ASA 5510 - restrictions of VPN (AnyConnect) based on the AD user or IP address

  Hello

  I want to test how to restrict access user on an ASA 5510 AnyConnect. In politics, I can define what networks will go through the VPN tunnel and which not (split tunneling). The ASA has a LDAP connection and only AD users with a special security group can connect over AnyConnect.
  On the other hand I would like to restrict access for special users within a VPN policy.

  So my question:
  What are your recommendations to implement this szenario?

  My two ideas would be:
  1. the access rules based on the user of the AD.
  2. special reserve IP addresses in the pool of addresses AnyConnect for some users, so I can limit access to the normal firewall rules base based on the source IP address.

  What are your recommendations and is it possible to realize my ideas (and how)?

  Thanks in advance

  Best regards

  Hello

  I will suggest that you configure a second ad group in the server and another group strategy in the ASA, you can configure certain access on each group policy "the installer of the filters, assign different split political tunnel, different ACL' and in the ad server, you can assign users for example to the AD Group A and AD Group B based on the access you want to give them now , you must configure LDAP mapping to assign the user specific group policy that you want based on the AD group that they belong.

  You can follow this documentation that will help you configure the LDAP Mapping:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  Best regards, please rate.

• Cisco ASA 5510, ipsec vpn. What address to connect the client to

  Hello

  It's maybe a stupid question, but I can't find the answer anywhere.

  I used the ipsec vpn configuration wizard, I activated the external interface to access ipsec and went through SCW pools of addresses etc. When I try to connect with the cisco vpn client to my address of the external interface (of a remote host) I'm unable to connect. I scanned the interface for open ports, but there is not, I have to allow traffic to ipsec at this interface?

  Best regards

  Andreas

  No, once you have configured the access remote vpn ipsec, it will be automatically activated, and you should be able to connect to the ASA outside the ip address of the interface.

  Can you please share the configuration? and also which group name you are trying to access the vpn client?

• VPN Cisco ASA 5540 L2L - one-way traffic only for the pair to a network

  Hello

  I'm a little confused as to which is the problem. This is the premise for the problem I have face.

  One of our big clients has a Cisco ASA5540 (8.2 (2)) failover (active / standby). Early last year, we have configured a VPN from Lan to Lan to a 3rd party site (a device of control point on their end). He worked until early this week when suddenly the connection problems.

  Only 1 of the 3 networks the / guests can access a remote network on the other side. 2 others have suddenly stopped working. We do not know of any change on our side and the remote end also insists that their end configurations are correct (and what information they sent me it seems to be correct)

  So essentially the encryption field is configured as follows:

  access-list line 1 permit extended ip 10.238.57.21 host 10.82.0.202 (hitcnt = 2)
  access-list line 2 extended permit ip 10.207.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 (hitcnt = 198)
  access-list line 3 extended permit ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 (hitcnt = 173)

  Free NAT has been configured as follows (names modified interfaces):

  NAT (interface1) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-VPN-SHEEP

  the INTERIOR-VPN-SHEEP line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  permit for Access-list SHEEP-VPN-INSIDE line lengthened 2 ip host 10.238.57.21 10.82.0.202

  NAT (interface2) 0-list of access VPN-SHEEP

  VPN-SHEEP line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.207.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252

  After the problem started only 10.207.0.0/16 network connections worked for the site remote 10.82.0.200/30. All other connections do not work.

  There has been no change made on our side and on the side remote also insists there has been no change. I also checked how long the ASAs have been upward and how long the same device has been active in the failover. Both have been at the same time (about a year)

  The main problem is that users of the 10.231.191.0/24 cant access remote network network. However, the remote user can initiate and implement the VPN on their side but usually get any return traffic. Ive also checked that the routes are configured correctly in the routers in core for the return of their connections traffic should go back to the firewall.

  Also used of "packet - trace" event raising the VPN tunnel (even if it passes the phases VPN). For my understanding "packet - trace" alone with the IP source and destination addresses must activate the VPN connection (even if it generates no traffic to the current tunnel).

  This is printing to the following command: "packet - trace entry interface1 tcp 10.231.191.100 1025 10.82.0.203 80.

  Phase: 1
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Implicit rule
  Additional information:
  MAC access list

  Phase: 2
  Type: FLOW-SEARCH
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  Not found no corresponding stream, creating a new stream

  Phase: 3
  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH
  Subtype: entry
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  in 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 outside

  Phase: 4
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype: Journal
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Access-group interface interface1
  access-list extended allow ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  Additional information:

  Phase: 5
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 6
  Type: INSPECT
  Subtype: np - inspect
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the http
  global service-policy global_policy
  Additional information:

  Phase: 7
  Type: FOVER
  Subtype: Eve-updated
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 8
  Type: NAT-FREE
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 outside 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  Exempt from NAT
  translate_hits = 32, untranslate_hits = 35251
  Additional information:

  -Phase 9 is a static nat of the problem to another network interface. Don't know why his watch to print.

  Phase: 9
  Type: NAT
  Subtype: host-limits
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  static (interface1, interface3) 10.231.0.0 10.231.0.0 255.255.0.0 subnet mask
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.0.0 255.255.0.0 interface3 all
  static translation at 10.231.0.0
  translate_hits = 153954, untranslate_hits = 88
  Additional information:

  -Phase 10 seems to be the default NAT for the local network configuration when traffic is to the Internet

  Phase: 10
  Type: NAT
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT (interface1) 5 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 outside of any
  dynamic translation of hen 5 (y.y.y.y)
  translate_hits = 3048900, untranslate_hits = 77195
  Additional information:

  Phase: 11
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: encrypt
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 12
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 13
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 14
  Type: CREATING STREAMS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  New workflow created with the 1047981896 id, package sent to the next module

  Result:
  input interface: interface1
  entry status: to the top
  entry-line-status: to the top
  output interface: outside
  the status of the output: to the top
  output-line-status: to the top
  Action: allow

  So, basically, the connection should properly go to connect VPN L2L but yet is not. I tried to generate customer traffic of base (with the source IP address of the client network and I see the connection on the firewall, but yet there is absolutely no encapsulated packets when I check "crypto ipsec to show his" regarding this connection VPN L2L.) Its almost as if the firewall only transfers the packets on the external interface instead of encapsulating for VPN?

  And as I said, at the same time the remote end can activate the connection between these 2 networks very well, but just won't get any traffic back to their echo ICMP messages.

  access-list extended allow ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.231.191.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.82.0.200/255.255.255.252/0/0)
  current_peer: y.y.y.y

  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
  #pkts decaps: 131, #pkts decrypt: 131, #pkts check: 131
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, comp #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
  success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
  Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  If it was just a routing problem it would be a simple thing to fix, but it is not because I can see the connection I have to confirm it by the router base on the firewall, but they don't just get passed on to the VPN connection.

  Could this happen due to a bug in the Software ASA? Would this be something with Checkpoint VPN device? (I have absolutely no experience with devices of control point)

  If there is any essential information that I can give, please ask.

  -Jouni

  Jouni,

  8.2.4.1 is the minimum - 8.2.4 had some issues (including TCP proxy).

  If this does not resolve the problem - I suggest open TAC box to get to the bottom of this ;-)

  Marcin

• Cisco ASA - ASDM will not launch (Please wait while the certificate information to be retrieved)

  I have a problem with a Cisco ASA 5505. ASA 9.0 (3) / ASDM 7.4 (1).

  I did a factory reset, format flash, all copied from tftp.

  Config copied from another SAA. Subsequently changed the host name entries.

  connect host name

  Crypto ca trustpoint ASDM_TrustPoint0
  name of the object CN =connect
  Crypto ca trustpoint ASDM_TrustPoint1
  name of the object CN =connect

  ASA works very well and the home tabs & follow-up in the works of the ASDM, but I'm not able to work on the configuration using ASDM :(

  When I go to the Configuration tab, I get this message (which remains forever):

  Please wait while the certificate information to be retrieved

  I tried a 'webvpn all come back' and backup/reloading. Did not help.

  Error message and flash content - see photo attached.

  Suggestions are greatly appreciated.

  ARO

  Nils

  HI Nils,

  Please use the asdm 7.4.2 who has a lot of bugs.

  Thank you

  VR

• Cisco easy VPN + loopback interface. static ip address for the client

  Good day people.

  I have a couple a question and answer on which I can't google for a period. BTW I maybe simly use bad aproach to choose keywords.

  Thus,.

  (1) is it possible to assign the same IP to the same customer every time that it authenticated, preferably without using DHCP? Definely im sure it is possible, but can't find match configuration examples (my camera's 1921 Cisco IOS 15.0.1).

  (2) is it possible to assign the dynamic crypto map to the loopback interface (to make EASY VPN Server accessible through two interfaces - maybe you recommend another approach instead?) - that I move the map workingcrypto of int phy loopback - I can not connect with reason "SA Phace1 policy proposal" not accepted

  Hello

  (1) you can attach to the same IP to the same username using RADIUS

  (2) If you have 2 outside interfaces

  Then, you would use

  mymap-address loop0 crypto card

  int gig0/0

  crypto mymap map

  int g0/1

  cryptp map mymap

  By doing so, the local address would actually be the loop0 but Cryptography card HAS to be applied on physical output interfaces

  See you soon

  OLivier

• Cisco ASA5520 facing ISP with private IP address. How to get the IPSec VPN through the internet?

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-top : 0 ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-left : 0 ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ;}

  Hello guys,.

  I have Cisco ASA5520 facing the ISP with private IP address. We don't have a router and how to get the IPSec VPN through the internet?

  The question statement not the interface pointing to ISP isn't IP address private and inside as well.

  Firewall configuration:

  Firewall outside interface Gi0 10.0.1.2 > ISP 10.0.1.1 with security-level 0

  Firewall inside the interface Ethernet0 192.168.1.1 > LAN switch 192.168.1.2 with security-level 100

  I have public IP block 199.9.9.1/28

  How can I use the public IP address to create the IPSec VPN tunnel between two sites across the internet?

  can I assign a public IP address on the Gig1 inside the interface with the security level of 100 and how to apply inside to carry on this interface?

  If I configure > firewall inside of the item in gi1 interface ip address 199.9.9.1/28 with security-level 100. How to make a safe lane VPN through this interface on the internet?

  I'm used to the public IP address allocation to the interface outside of the firewall and private inside the interface IP address.

  Please help with configuration examples and advise.

  Thank you

  Eric

  Unfortunately, you can only complete the VPN connection on the interface the VPN connection source, in your case the external interface.

  3 options:

  (1) connect a router in front of the ASA and assign your public ip address to the ASA outside interface.

  OR /.

  (2) If your ISP can perform static translation of 1 to 1, then you can always finish the VPN on the external interface and ask your provider what is the static ip address assigned to your ASA out of the IP (10.0.1.2) - this will launch the VPN of bidirectionally

  OR /.

  (3) If your ISP performs PAT (dynamic NAT), then you can only start the tunnel VPN on the side of the ASA and the other end of the tunnel must be configured to allow VPN LAN-to-LAN dynamics.

• Remote access VPN Cisco ASA

  Hello!

  I have 9.1 (3) version of Cisco ASA with remote access VPN set UP on the outside interface. When the user connects to the Internet on the outside interface, it works well. My goal is to allow the connection of all other interfaces (inside the dmz and etc.) to the outside interface. Cisco ASA allows to do? Order to packet - trace output is less to:

  MSK-hq-fw1 # packet - trace entry inside tcp 10.10.10.1 14214 1.1.1.2 443

  Phase: 1

  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH

  Subtype: entry

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  developed 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 identity

  Phase: 2

  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH

  Subtype: entry

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  developed 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 identity

  Result:

  input interface: inside

  entry status: to the top

  entry-line-status: to the top

  the output interface: NP identity Ifc

  the status of the output: to the top

  output-line-status: to the top

  Action: drop

  Drop-reason: (headwall) No. road to host

  Hello

  Well, you can of course turn VPN on other interfaces, but to be honest, I never even tried to set up the VPN it otherwise than of multiple multiple external interfaces in the case of the ISP and in this case only for testing purposes.

  Some things related to the ASA are well known but not well documented.

  The official document that I can remember: this is the following (which only refers to this limitation regarding the ICMP)

  Note 
  For  security purposes the security appliance does not support far-end  interface ping, that is pinging the IP address of the outside interface  from the inside network.
  

  Source (old configuration guide):

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa71/configuration/guide/conf_gd/trouble.html#wp1059645

  -Jouni

• Cisco ASA: Redundancy of double ISP VPN...

  Hello, if it anyway to configure vpn site to site redundancy using a cisco asa. I know that I can configure the redundancy using two ISP on my cisco ASA, pointing to the same peer, but what if I need to point to different peers but to protect the same networks...

  I know it's possible in routers using tunnels gre + ipsec or VTI, but if there of still something similar using cisco ASA?

  Any help will be appreciated! Thank you!

  

  Hello

  Yes, Nagiswaren is right. For example, you have this:

  Based on the image above and your answers, you need to configure something like this:

  Subnet mask IP address name interface method
  Ethernet0/0 outsideVPN 10.198.16.143 255.255.255.224 manual
  Ethernet0/1 inside 172.31.255.1 255.255.255.0 Manual
  Ethernet0/2 outside-VPN2 10.198.29.21 255.255.255.224 manual

  Ethernet0/3 INTERNET 12.12.12.12 255.255.255.224 manual

  155 extended access-list allow ip 10.0.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.10.0 255.255.255.0
  IP 10.0.20.0 allow Access-list extended sheep 255.255.255.0 10.0.10.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3DES-MD5

  correspondence address card crypto mymap 10 155
  map mymap 10 set peer 1.1.1.1 crypto 2.2.2.2
  mymap 10 transform-set 3DES-MD5 crypto card
  card crypto mymap interface outsideVPN
  crypto interface outside-VPN2 mymap map
  ISAKMP crypto enable outsideVPN
  ISAKMP crypto enable outside-VPN2

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  md5 hash
  Group 2
  life 86400

  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared-key cisco123

  tunnel-group 2.2.2.2 type ipsec-l2l
  2.2.2.2 tunnel-group ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared-key cisco123

  =============================================================================================

  FOLLOW-UP OF THE OBJECT

  Track 100 rtr 10 accessibility
  ALS 10 monitor
  type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 4.2.2.2 interface outsideVPN
  NUM-package of 3
  frequency 10
  Annex monitor SLA 10 life never start-time now

  course INTERNET 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 12.12.12.1 1

  Route outsideVPN 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 10.198.16.129 1 followed by 100

  Route outsideVPN 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 10.198.16.129 1 followed by 100

  Route outsideVPN 10.0.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.198.16.129 1 followed by 100
  Route outsideVPN 4.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 10.198.16.129 1

  Route outside-VPN2 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 10.198.29.1 254
  Route outside-VPN2 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 10.198.29.1 254

  Route outside-VPN2 10.0.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.198.29.1 254

  I used 4.2.2.2 but you can use the isps1 IP address.

  ==========================ROUTER===================================================================
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2

  access-list 133 allow ip 10.0.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.20.0 0.0.0.255

  ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 10.198.16.143 No.-xauth

  ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 10.198.29.21 No.-xauth

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

  primary-card 10 map ipsec-isakmp crypto
  defined by peer 10.198.16.143

  defined by peer 10.198.29.21
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  match address 133

  secondary-card 10 map ipsec-isakmp crypto
  defined by peer 10.198.16.143

  defined by peer 10.198.29.21
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  match address 133

  interface FastEthernet0
  IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
  crypto primer-card card

  interface FastEthernet1
  IP address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
  card crypto high school-map

  Interface Vlan1 * inside the interface *.
  IP 10.0.10.1 255.255.255.0

  1 IP sla monitor
  Protocol type echo 4.2.2.2 ipIcmpEcho
  timeout of 1000
  frequency 3
  threshold 2

  IP sla monitor Appendix 1 point of life to always start-time now
  accessibility of rtr 1 track 123

  IP route 4.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.254 permanent
  IP route 10.198.16.143 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.254 1 follow 123

  IP route 10.198.29.21 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.254 1 follow 123

  IP route 10.0.20.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.254 1 follow 123

  IP route 10.198.16.143 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.254 200

  IP route 10.198.29.21 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.254 200

  IP route 10.0.20.0 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.254 200

  -josemed

• Cisco Asa 5505 and level 3 with remote access VPN switch

  Today I had a new CISCO LAYER 3 switch... So here's my scenrio

  Cisco Asa 5505

  I have

  Outside of the == 155.155.155.x

  Inside = 192.168.7.1

  Address POOL VPN = 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.20

  3 layer switch configuration

  VLAN 2

  ip address of the interface = 192.168.1.1

  VLAN 2

  ip address of the interface = 192.168.2.1

  VLAN 2

  ip address of 192.168.3.1 = interface

  VLAN 2

  ip address of the interface = 192.168.4.1

  VLAN 2

  ip address of the interface = 192.168.5.1

  IP Routing

  So I want the customers of my remote access VPN to access all that these networks. So please can you give me a useful tip or a link to set up the rest of my trip

  Thanks to you all

  Al ready has responded

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Failover on Cisco ASA 5505 with EasyVPN

  Hello

  I've implemented a customer EasyVPN with a Cisco ASA 5505 and I am trying to configure the failover but I get this message:

  "Failover cannot be configured as Cisco Easy VPN remote is activated."

  However, I have seen in the link below, this dynamic rollover is compatible with the easy standard (and not with improved but I don't think I use easyVPN improved).

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/iOS-easy-VPN/e...

  The configuration I did through ASDM is very simple:

  vpnclient server * * *.
  vpnclient-mode client mode
  vpngroup vpnclient * password *.
  vpnclient username * password *.
  vpnclient enable

  My question is how can I implement failover with a client on a Cisco ASA 5505 EasyVPN?

  Thanks in advance

  You cannot configure the failover of a device that acts as a client

• Cisco ASA 5510 - IOS upgrade 7.0 failing. Not found Flash BIOS

  Hello everyone

  I have a Cisco ASA 5510 in a lab with none of the configurations environment what so ever.

  Objective: upgrade the IOS current version 7.0 (8) to 7.1.1 (possibly go to 8.2 until memory upgrade on the SAA: 256 MB to 1 GB and then move to the latest version of 8.2 IOS).

  Output to see the attached Version.

  Output Flash attached show.

  asa711 - k8.bin is the file that has been copied from a TFTP server to flash.

  The following commands have been executed in order to update the IOS

  ciscoasa (config) # boot flash system: / asa711 - k8.bin
  INFO: Conversion of flash: / asa711 - k8.bin to disk0: / asa711 - k8.bin
  ciscoasa (config) #.
  ciscoasa (config) # end
  ciscoasa # write memory
  Cryptochecksum: aaaa08ce ccde38f2 19c42e08 dea24cbd
  2713 bytes copied in 1,450 dry (2713 bytes/s)
  [OK]
  ciscoasa # reload
  

  PROBLEM: the device ASA goes in an infinite loop (guard restart). This is the message on the console:

  The system boot, please wait...

  CISCO SYSTEMS
  Embedded BIOS Version 1.0 (11) 15:11:51.82 5 08/28/08
  Memory: 631ko
  Memory: 256 MB
  PCI device table.
  Bus Dev Func VendID DevID class Irq
  00 00 00 8086 2578 host Bridge
  00 01 00 8086 2579 PCI to PCI bridge
  00 03 00 8086 PCI bridge to PCI 257 b
  00 1 00 8086 PCI bridge to PCI 25AE
  1 d 00 00 8086 25A 9 Serial Bus 11
  1 00 01 8086 25AA Bus series 10 d
  1 d 00 04 8086 25AB system
  1 d 00 05 8086 25AC IRQ controller
  1 d 00 07 8086 25AD Bus series 9
  1E 00 00 8086 PCI bridge to 244th PCI
  1F 00 00 8086 25A 1 ISA Bridge
  1F 00 02 8086 25 IDE controller has 3 11
  1F 00 03 8086 25A 4 Bus series 5
  1F 00 05 8086 25A 6 Audio 5
  02 01 00 8086 1075 Ethernet 11
  03 01 00 177 D 0003 encrypt/decrypt 9
  03 02 00 8086 1079 Ethernet 9
  03 02 01 8086 1079 Ethernet 9
  03 03 00 8086 1079 Ethernet 9
  03 03 01 8086 1079 Ethernet 9
  04 02 00 8086 1209 Ethernet 11
  04 03 00 8086 1209 Ethernet 5
  Evaluate the BIOS Options...
  Launch of the BIOS Extension installation ROMMON
  Cisco Systems ROMMON Version (1.0 (11) 5) #0: Thu Aug 28 15:23:50 CDT 2008
  Platform ASA5510
  Use BREAK or ESC to interrupt the boot.
  Use the SPACE to start boot immediately.
  Start the program boot...
  Startup configuration file contains 1 entry.

  Load disk0: / asa711 - k8.bin... The starting...

  256 MB OF RAM
  Total of SSMs found: 0
  Total cards network found: 7
  mcwa i82557 Ethernet to irq 11 MAC: 0024.974a.65af
  mcwa i82557 Ethernet to the irq 5 MAC: 0000.0001.0001
  Not found BIOS flash.
  Reset...

  The only way for me to do things to normal is if I BREAK the sequence starting with ESC and go into ROMMON mode. I then issue a start command for the SAA to start with 7.0 (8) default IOS Image.

  Please can someone explain what is the problem here?

  Apologies if I'm missing something obvious that I'm not an expert of the SAA.

  Looks like that the ASA is hitting a field notice: fn62378. The FN, it's because of the incompatible version of hardware and software. Please upgrade to version 7.1.2 instead of 7.1.1. If you plan to spend in 8.2. So instead of going 7.1.2 you could go to 7.2.5 (recommanded), then 8.2.5

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/620/fn62378.html

  It will be useful.

  Kind regards

  Akshay Rouanet

  Remember messages useful rate.

• Select Cisco ASA to replace Palo Alto PA 500

  Hello world

  Pls suggest a Cisco ASA (equivalent or superior) 5500 series to replace the PA500. Thank you

  Palo Alto PA500

  • Firewall of 250 Mbit/s throughput (App - ID¹active)
  • 100 Mbps threat prevention throughput
  • 50 VPN IPSec Mbps throughput
  • 64 000 max sessions
  • 7 500 new sessions per second
  • Tunnels/tunnel VPN IPSec 250 interfaces
  • 100 users, SSL VPN
  • 3 virtual routers
  • Virtual systems (basic/max) N/A
  • 20 security zones
  • 1 000 maximum policies

  Hi you can opt for the Asa 5510 or Asa 5520 two of them correspond to your needs. Here is a link to their characteristics http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/asa-5500-serie... Aditya cordially

• Cisco VPN client 3.5.1 and Cisco ASA 5.2 (2)

  Hello

  I have a strange problem about Cisco VPN client (IPSec) with Cisco ASA. The Cisco ASA runs software version 5.2 (2). The Cisco VPN client version is 3.5.1.

  The problem is the customer able Cisco VPN to authenticate successfully with Cisco ASA, but could not PING to any LAN behind the Cisco ASA. In any case, the problem disappeared when we used the Cisco VPN version 4.6 or 4.8 of the customer. All parameters are exactly the same. What has happened? What is the cause of this problem? How can I solve this problem?

  Please advice.

  Thank you

  Nitass

  I understand your problem, I never used 3.5.1 so I thought that maybe nat - t is not enabled by default as 4.x.