Cisco ISE - adding wireless AP s ISE

I am currently in audit mode with my implementation of ISE.  I have a Cisco CAPWAP 2602 access point connected to a provisioned ISE 3750.  My policy of Auth is a failure on the AP because it does not find in any store identity.

So, my question is, what is the best way to inventory all of my network of the AP?  We have about 300.   They are obviously not in AD and I'm not sure I want to bulk add the AP store internal endpoints and must constantly manage the inventory if AP is swapped.

My thought was to have ISE dynamically reference my WLC for all my AP registered to authenticate them, but I don't see a way to do it.

Ideas?

THX

If you are somewhere where normally supply you new APs, you can use 802. 1 x to authenticate, all you have to do is the WLC config for 802. 1 x for APs, boot on a non-dot1x port so that they can get the config of your WLC first, then move to where they should be in your building.

Otherwise, you will need to return to the less secure and method heavy managing more than make an inventory of the mac address.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Cisco Ise 1.3 with Flex to connect wireless supported function

    Hello

    My environment is formed ROUND of flex-mode connection wireless and cisco Ise 1.3, these features are supported?
    Basic functions of the AAA
    profiling
    posturing
    Substitution VLAN
    Substitution of the ACL
    Comments commissioning

    TrustSec 2.0 this MDC is not supported? someone try this feature?

    These all work with ISE 1.3 and FlexConnect WLAN.

    You need the right license ISE - the type of mobility (wireless) license will cover everything. If you have wired and wireless, then you must have basic (for most features) + more (for profiling) + Apex (for Posturing).

  • Integration of CISCO ISE with another controller wireless lan of the seller

    Hi all!

    I am currently working on an assignment and eager to integrate the identity service provider in the network. the only problem is that the deployed wireless network earlier of another provider I just need to know that either ISE has integration with the other controller feature wireless provider and can provide guest access control. The LDAP integration is also required.

    Waiting for help!

    Hello

    According to my knowledge Yes, Cisco ISE can be integrated with another controller wireless LAN of the seller, but limited. (Aruba, Rukus) and if you want to add the external identity group to your network, then LDAP integration is required.

  • Cisco ISE 1.2 and the ad group

    Hello

    I have Cisco ISE installed on my EXSi server for my test pilot. I added several ad groups at ISE as well.

    I created a condition of authorization policy, that is WIRELESS_DOT1X_USERS (see screenshot)
    Basically, I just replicate the default Wireless_802.1X and added Network Access: EapAuthentication, Equals, EAP - TLS.

    My problem is, I have been unable to join the wireless network, if I added my ad group to the authorization strategy (see screenshot). The user I is a member of WLAN USERS. If I removed the authorization policy group, the use is able to join the wireless network.

    I have attached the screenshot of ISE newspapers as well. I checked the ISE, AD/NPS, WLC, laptop computer time and date, and they are all in sync.

    I also have the WLC added as NPS client on my network.

    I checked the newspaper AD and I found it, it was the local management user WLCs trying to authenticate. It is supposed to be my wireless user Credential is not the WLC.

    It's the paper I received from the AD/NPS

    Access denied to user network policy server.

    Contact the server administrator to strategy network for more information.

    User:

    Security ID: NULL SID

    Account name: admin

    Domain account: AAENG

    Account name: AAENG\admin

    Client computer:

    Security ID: NULL SID

    Account name: -.

    Full account name: -.

    OS version: -.

    Called Station identifier: -.

    Calling the Station identifier: -.

    NAS:

    NAS IPv4 address: 172.28.255.42

    NAS IPv6 address: -.

    NAS identifier: RK3W5508-01

    NAS Port Type: -.

    NAS Port:                              -

    RADIUS client:

    Friendly name of client: RK3W5508-01

    The client IP address: 172.28.255.42

    Information about authentication:

    Connection request policy name: Windows authentication for all users use

    The network policy name: -.

    Authentication provider: Windows

    Authentication server: WIN - RSTMIMB7F45.aaeng.local

    Authentication type: PAP

    EAP Type:                              -

    Identifier for account: -.

    Results of logging: Accounting Information was written in the local log file.

    Reason code: 16

    Reason: Authentication failed due to incompatibility of user credentials. The provided username is not mapped to an existing user account or the password is incorrect.

    Hello

    The problem is with what ISE name, it's choosing to search of the AD. If you look in the ISE newspapers down, you'll see the username that use ISE (firstname, lastname) to search for the AD.

    In your certificate template see what attribute containst name AD (possibly the dns name or email or the name of principle of RFC 822 NT), go to your profile to authenticate cerificate and use this attribute for the user name.

    Thank you

    Tarik Admani
    * Please note the useful messages *.

  • Cisco ISE and Meraki RADIUS

    I am very new to Cisco ISE and Meraki.  I try to get the Radius configuration for wireless authentication.  When I do a test of the Meraki to ISE, it passes.

    When I try to connect from my laptop, I look at the logs of the Radius and it passes; However, it does not connect me to good policy.  I keep hitting the default policy.  I have my Meraki police above the default policy in the strategy defined in article.  I have attached what looks like my strategy game.

    Devices does not really matter. Here is what I see when I create a device group (where you add the access point to this group), and then create the condition:

    And here is where I create the condition of strategy game and you should be able to select the Meraki access points:

    This will give you the condition similar to what I posted above. This is perhaps why you aren't hit that is not matching the condition for this game.

  • Cisco ISE 1.3 disable "Identity Resolve" step?

    Currently, I am working for a client with a Cisco ISE 1.3 deployment.

    The Cisco access point are currently authenticated by MAB, the customer wants to improve that I proposed to implement EAP-FAST speed of the MAB for the AP for a quick and easy solution.

    I work in the test and production environment, but I was cycling through the authentication process and found something strange.

    I created a rule that if the Tunnel network protocol is EAP-FAST are authenticated by internal users.

    It works very well, the ISE recognizes the flow and internal users through authenticatie.

    15041 assessment political identity
    15048 questioned PIP - Network Access.EapAuthentication
    15048 questioned PIP - Network Access.EapTunnel
    15004 Matched rule - EAP-FAST
    15013 selected identity Source - internal users
    24210 Looking user in IDStore of internal users - >
    24212 found user in internal users IDStore
    Authentication 22037 spent

    On the way he also decided to search for the user in Active Directory.

    Given that the user has not been created in Active Directory, that it does not.

    Looking 24432 user in Active Directory - >
    Identity resolution 24325 - >
    Search 24313 of corresponding accounts at the junction - >
    24318 no corresponding account found in the forest - >
    24322 identity resolution detected no corresponding case
    Failure of the 24352 - ERROR_NO_SUCH_USER identity resolution
    24412 not found user in Active Directory - >
    15048 questioned PIP - >. ExternalGroups
    15048 questioned PIP - Network Access.EapTunnel
    15004 Matched rule - AP_EAPFAST
    15016 selected the authorization - AP_Lan profile
    11002 returned access RADIUS acceptance

    So the authentication and authorization is successful but he try's to resolve the user in active directory.

    I checked the authentication for MAB process, and here I see the same error.

    The MAC address of the device used to MAB also is added to the ISE, then authentication through internal users, authentication and authorization is successful, but ISE wants to solve the (MAC address of the device) user in Active Directory.

    We also see this step for the flow of EAP - TLS, and in this case the identity stage via resolution is successful.

    Is it possible that I can disable the resolution of identity through AD when the internal user group? (or in the world?)

    I did some research and found this (search for LDAP users)

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.0/user_guide/ise10_man_id...

    When I look at our deployment, it is nothing configured under LDAP.

    If you have rules in your authorization rules that use ad groups that are in front of your MAB or the EAP-FAST rules, ISE will do a search to see if it needs to match this rule. Put your MAB and EAP-FAST rules about AD membership rules, and it won't do the research.

  • Authentication (Windows Server 2013) AD Cisco ISE problem

    Background:

    Has deployed two Cisco ISE 1.1.3. ISE will be used to authenticate users wireless access admin WLC and switches. Database backend is Microsoft running on Windows Server 2012 AD. Existing Cisco ACS 4.2 still running and authenticate users. There are two Cisco WLCs version 7.2.111.3.

    Wireless users authenticates to AD, through works of GBA 4.2. Access admin WLC and switches to the announcement through ISE works. Authentication with PEAP-MSCHAPv2 access and admin PAP/ASCII wireless.

    Problem:

    Wireless users cannot authenticate to the announcement through ISE. This is the error message '11051 RADIUS packet contains invalid state attribute' & '24444 Active Directory failed because of an error that is not specified in the ISE'.

    Conducted a detailed test of the AD of the ISE. The test was a success and the result seems fine except for the below:

    xxdc01.XX.com (10.21.3.1)

    Ping: 0 Mins Ago

    Status: down

    xxdc02.XX.com (10.21.3.2)

    Ping: 0 Mins Ago

    Status: down

    xxdc01.XX.com

    Last success: Thu Jan 1 10:00 1970

    March 11 failure: read 11:18:04 2013

    Success: 0

    Chess: 11006

    xxdc02.XX.com

    Last success: Fri Mar 11 09:43:31 2013

    March 11 failure: read 11:18:04 2013

    Success: 25

    Chess: 11006

    Domain controller: xxdc02.xx.com:389

    Domain controller type: unknown functional level DC: 5

    Domain name: xx.COM

    IsGlobalCatalogReady: TRUE

    DomainFunctionality: 2 = (DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003)

    ForestFunctionality: 2 = (DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003)

    Action taken:

    Log Cisco ISE and WLC by using the credentials of the AD. This excludes the connection AD, clock and AAA shared secret as the problem.

    (2) wireless authentication tested using EAP-FAST, but same problem occurs.

    (3) detailed error message shows below. This excludes any authentication and authorization policies. Even before hitting the authentication policy, the AD search fails.

    12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response

    11808 extracted EAP-response containing EAP - MSCHAP VERSION challenge response to the internal method and accepting of EAP - MSCHAP VERSION such as negotiated

    Evaluate the politics of identity

    15006 set default mapping rule

    15013 selected identity Store - AD1

    24430 Authenticating user in Active Directory

    24444 active Directory operation failed because of an error that is not specified in the ISE

    (4) enabled the registration of debugging AD and had a look at the logging. Nothing significant, and no clue about the problem.

    (5) wireless tested on different mobile phones with the same error and laptos

    (6) delete and add new customer/features of AAA Cisco ISE and WLC

    (7) ISE services restarted

    (8) join domain on Cisco ISE

    (9) notes of verified version of ISE 1.1.3 and WLC 7.2.111.3 for any open caveats. Find anything related to this problem.

    10) there are two ISE and two deployed WLC. Tested a different combination of ISE1 to WLC1, ISE1 to WLC2, etc. This excludes a hardware problem of WLC.

    Other possibilities/action:

    1) test it on another version WLC. Will have to wait for approval of the failure to upgrade the WLC software.

    (2) incompatibility between Cisco ISE and AD running on Microsoft Windows Server 2012

    Did he experienced something similar to have ideas on why what is happening?

    Thank you.

    Update:

    (1) built an another Cisco ISE 1.1.3 sever in another data center that uses the same domain but other domain controller. Thai domain controller running Windows Server 2008. This work and successful authentication.

    (2) my colleague tested in a lab environment Cisco ISE 1.1.2 with Windows Server 2012. He has had the same problem as described.

    This leads me to think that there is a compatibility issue of Cisco ISE with Windows Server 2012.



    Yes, it seems that 1.1.3 doesn't support Server 2012 as of yet.

    External identity Source OS/Version

    Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2003 R2 32-bit and 64-bit

    Active Directory Microsoft Windows 2008 32-bit and 64-bit

    Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2008 R2 64-bit only

    Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2003 32-bit only

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.PDF

  • Cisco ISE to jailbroken or android block specific versions

    We have Cisco ISE deployed with advanced subscription license. Is it possible to block jailbroken IOS devices and devices with the old android OS version (or root) to join the wireless network.

    You can only do that with ISE. You will need to purchase a supported MDM solution (Airwatch, MobileIron, Extend360, etc.) and integrate with ISE. The MDM can then be queried by ISE and check for things like rooted device, PIN, encryption, etc.

    Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

  • That treats the assignment do VLAN authorization Cisco ISE?

    Hello

    When I create an authorization policy in Cisco ISE, under common tasks, it is the assignment of VLANS. What makes that? Is it puts the user on this VLAN?

    Thank you.

    Yes, this will overwrite the VLAN configured on the switch port/SSID or wireless. For example, all ports can be configured to be part of VLAN 10, but you want users to finances in VLAN 20. You can use the profile of EHT permission to do exactly this.

    Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

  • Cisco ISE profiling - Split-Corporate/guest access

    Hi all

    I currently deploying a Cisco ISE for my wireless network and I would like to divide my WLAN in two different "authorisation profile": comments and Corporate.

    For now, I use my active Directory to authenticate users and profiling to authorize the device with the host name. I would like to sort by domain name with DHCP probe but I can't because there is always an answer of DHCP message with the domain given by the DHCP server, you have a solution to separate unit with domain name or other attributes?

    Thanks in advance for your answer!

    You can create different authorization profile based on the identity group they belong to, therefore, make two profiles based on two membership group (guests / corporate AD users) and assign them different access. consult the ISE 1.2 config guide.

  • Cisco ISE comments Portal - DNS problem - External area

    Hello

    I have a client that has the following sceanrio:

    In a wireless deployment and deployment Cisco ISE 1.1.3 with CWA, when the wireless client receives the URL ISE redictect (URL to access the portal of ISE comments), this URL is based on the ISE DNS name, not on its IP address. Thus, the PC cannot solve this problem by DNS name because there is no DNS in the external area (for the guets) or by using the addresses of servers DNS ISP provided by the DHCP server, and therefore it cannot access the portal comments at all;

    I know that in an attempt to manually code the IP address - it doesn't (IE in the authorization profile CWA, the equivalent URL redirection via the pair av CISCO as follows:)

    Cisco-AV-Paire = redirect url =https://10.10.10.10:8443/guestportal/gateway? sessionId = sessionIdValue & action = cwa,)

    given that the sessionIdValue variable is not replaced by its real value when sending to the wireless client)

    My question is: this question has been addressed in version 1.2 of Cisco of ISE - has anyone tried it if has been processed? If not in Cisco 1.2 - does anyone know iof this feature will become available?

    Thanks in advance for your answers.

    Robert C.

    Robert,

    Manual assignment has been made available in version 1.2 of the ISE.

    M.

  • I need Cisco ISE VM part # L - ISE - VM - K9 = to install ESXi

    Hello

    Do I need permit L-ISE-VM-K9 to install Cisco ISE on an ESXi?

    In fact, Cisco ISE can be downloaded with an Eval license for 90 days.

    I know, ISE license (basic license, for example) is required.

    Thank you very much.

    Greetings,

    Norbert

    Although the demonstration you use is free, you have to pay for L-ISE-VM-K9 when you move to a production model because it uses an Oracle database licensed under it.  You must do this for each instance of ISE you are running.  You can then buy licenses wireless as necessary for your number of devices.

  • Cisco first 2.1 / 2.2 support for Cisco ise 1.3?

    Hi, I just tried to connect cisco IP 2.1 to cisco ISE 1.3, but fails.
    I read the Release Notes, only 1.2 ISE ist supported.
    But I was wondering that the ssl negotiation fails (I made a packet capture).
    So PI 2.1 has not tried to connect to the ise 1.3 via api, because of the connection fails during the ssl handshake.

    Anyway, does anyone know if ISE 1.3 will be supported with a PI or PI 2.2 version 2.1.x?

    ICC 2.1.2 supports up to 1.2 ISE.  ICC 2.2 release date is scheduled for December 2014.  Read below.

    Table 4 The Infrastructure first, Cisco and Cisco wireless version compatibility matrix

  • Cisco ise license command

    I have a question

    1. is it possible to install the Cisco ISE software on the server machine to physical HP (without solution VMware or without the use of SNS-3415-k9 cisco device)?

    2. for 2500 users online, I'll order L-ISE-BSE-2550, L-ISE-PLS-S-2500 and L-ISE-APX-S-2500 of basis, more and apex licenses. My question is HA (primary and secondary) application I need 2 licenses for each? (2 * L - ISE - BSE - 2550, 2 * L - ISE - PLS - S - 2500 and 2 * L - ISE - APX - S - 2500)

    or just a license for each is enough?

    3. If I implement Cisco ISE and HA on VMware environment, can I 2 L-ISE-VM-K9 licenses for each VM machines? and also I need 2 licenses for each basic, plus, and at the apex?

    4. What is smart net Cisco and Cisco SASU? need to buy these for support and ticketing system?

    5. What is license for cisco anyconnect (L-AC-APX-1 year-G)?

    thnx in adv.

    You can install ISE on a HP ONLY Server if you are using software virtualization (VMware or KVM).

    The Guide of Installation of ISE sets out three options:

    1 hardware appliance from cisco SNS

    2. virtual machine VMware

    3 Linux KVM.

    The AnyConnect license is required to qualify with the features of the Apex. It is not installed on the ISE server, however.

  • Cisco ISE with GANYMEDE + and RADIUS both?

    Hello

    I'm wired opening of authentication on a network using Cisco ISE. I studied the conditions for this. I know that I need to enable the RADIUS on the Cisco switches on the network. The switches in the network are already programmed to GANYMEDE +. Anyone know if they can both operate on the same network at the same time?

    Bob

    I suppose that Ganymede is configured (with ACS 4.x or 5.x) for the peripheral administration via telnet/ssh, and now you need the RADIUS (radius) to authenticate 802. 1 x. Yes they can both work on the same network at the same time.

    ~ BR
    Jatin kone

    * Does the rate of useful messages *.

  • Cisco ISE 1.1.2.145 Admin authentication via the LDAP protocol

    I have configured the LDAP protocol and able to retrieve our LDAP directory structure. Now, I'm trying to point authentication "Admin Access" Source 'External identity', which is the new LDAP IS I created. But I couldn't find an option to authenticate locally if for some reason the LDAP configuration does not work. I learned that the ISE can automatically return to local auth as external sources Idenitity are inaccessible. How can I test the LDAP authentication with breaking them our Admin Access? I thought to open two parallel sessions, one with Super Admin account Local and one with the domain account. But I noticed that ISE communication is smart enough for the closing session/connection no matter what other sessions in different browsers so, basically, I can't open two parallel sessions the same machine to test. Suggestions? or am I missing something here?

    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Srinivas,

    Even if you configure LDAP as a source of external identity of admin access, you can always internal relief without having locked. According to the ISE user guide:

    During the operation, Cisco ISE is designed to "fall back" and try to perform the internal identity database authentication, if the communication with the external identity store has not been established, or if it fails. In addition, whenever an administrator for which you have configured external authentication launches a browser and initiates a logon session, the administrator must still the option authentication of demand through the local Cisco ISE database by choosing 'Internal' to the Selector drop-down storage of identity in the Connect dialog box.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/user_guide/ise_man_identities.html#wp1351543

    Please see the attached screenshot by my lab ISE:

    I configured the admin authentication against AD, but I still see both 'Internal' and 'AD' at the time of the connection.

    I hope this helps.

    Thank you

    Aastha

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error, need to restore previous Firefox

    Firefox has been very slow, constantly showing Oswald, then tried to use 'Firefox restore', ' new profile ' etc., must have done the damage with the result that now I have a new page in Firefox without Favorites or links, and can't see how to restore

  • Someone else has volume function keys stop working?  If so, I know a fix?

    Sometimes, my function keys stop working.  The small volume box appears and the volume is shown to change but there is no real effect on the volume.  Anyone know a fix for this other than to restart the computer?

  • CLICK DISAPPEARED

    IM RUNNING WINDOWS XP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE PACK 3.  Windows xp lost his sound.when ' by clicking on ' a new page or movement occurs it is usually a "click" of the bip. There is now no 'click' sound. It used to be there. That's happened? How to restot

  • Vista Vostro 1000 restore to factory settings.

    I'm restoring my Vostro 1000 Vista laptop to factory settings. Following the restoration (full installation instructions factory) everything goes well until the advanced boot option screen is displayed (after pressing F8 repeatedly) after selecting "

  • Windows 7 will not be updated, so can't update to Windows 10

    Hello I'm updating someone laptop computer from 7 to 10, but the updates seem to cause problems. The machine is just looking for updates for hours. I tried to install Win10 from a USB memory created by the media creation tool, but they want to to che