Cisco ISE and Meraki RADIUS

Similar Questions

• Cisco ISE and WLC Access-List Design/scalability

  Hello

  I have a scenario that wireless clients are authenticated by the ISE and different ACL is applied depending on the rules in the ISE. The problem I have seen is due to the limitation on the Cisco WLC that limit only 64 input access list. As the installer has only a few IVR/interfaces and several different access lists are applied to the same base on user groups interface; I was wondering if there may be an evolutionary design / approach according to which the access list entries can evolve next to create a vlan for each group of users and apply the access list on the interface of layer 3 instead? I illustrated the configuration below for reference:

  Group of users 1 - apply ACL 1 - on Vlan 1

  User 2 group - apply ACL 2 - on the Vlan 1

  3 user group - apply ACL 3 - on the Vlan 1

  The problem appears only for wireless users, he does not see on wired users as the ACLs can be applied successfully without restriction as to the switches.

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  In fact, you have limitations on the side of the switch as well. Long ACL can deplete resources AAGR of the switch. Take a look at this link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/Catalyst-3750-series-switches/68461-high-CPU-utilization-cat3750.html

  The new WLCs based on IOS XE and not the old OS Wireless/Aironet will provide the best experience in these matters.

  Overall, I see three ways to overcome your current number:

  1. reduce the ACL by making them less specific

  2 use L3 interfaces on a switch L3 or FW and the ACL is applied to them

  3. use the SGT/SGA

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco ISE and external syslog server

  Hi Security Experts,

  We start with deployment cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) in our network. We have allocated 250 GB of space for the node (Admin + monitor) ISE.

  I want to know if we can send tracking of nodes of external syslog server logs after a defined time interval.

  For example, newspapers that are more than 10 days are for external syslog server. So basically our node monitoring will have the marbles which are the Max 9 days. Is this possible? Could you tell me some doc that explains the configuration of the same thing?

  Thank you

  Boudou

  No this is not possible via syslog. What you need is database purge, so that the monitoring database is purged after a determined time interval. Here's a guide that will help shed some light on this:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/user_guide/ise_mnt.html#wp1054328

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Cisco ISE and the fast user switching

  Greetings,

  In our deployment, we are interested in using the "fast user switching" which lies in the functionality of Windows.   After searching for a while, I see that the native Windows supplicant is not compatible with the fast user switching.   It does not appear that Anyconnect is either.   Can you please inform me as to what suppluicant, I need research to enable the functionality of Switchign user?

  We currently use ISE 1.2 Patch 4.

  Thank you for any assistance.

  David

  Cisco EHT NAC Agent does not support Windows fast user change when you use the native supplicant. This is because there is not clearly the older user disconnecting. When a new user is sent, the Agent is hung on the ID process and the old user session and therefore a new posture cannot take place. According to Microsoft Security policy, it is recommended to disable the fast user switching.

  Source:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.2/user_guide/ise_pos_pol.html

• Cisco ISE and question Admin CLI

  Hello.

  I have a strange problem with my installation of ISE. First of all, I use AD users for authentication. It works very well on HTTPS. I can connect with my admin AD by HTTPS.

  The problem starts when I try to log in via the CLI (SSH). I got login prompt. When I type my credentials AD that he said "Login Incorrect" and I got the same result if I try it with the local administrator account.

  I tried to reset the password for the local administrator over HTTPS to check this kind of wrong password. But no effect.

  My ISE is installed VMware.

  Experiences with it?

  ARM

  CLI authentication which is the base Linux OS is not / cannot be bound to AD to the admin authentication. Only, you integrate the application on top of Linux, which in this case is ISE, to AD. So, if you want to connect to the cli shell, you will need to use the username/password you configured during installation. If you do not remember those you need to perform a rest of password via the installation CD / ISO

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco ISE and the new Version of AntiVirus... not DAT

  I am ready to go to our VPN ISE users. It was a great test and it seems that we are ready to roll.

  Then comes a new version of our corporate AntiVirus software. We had Kaspersky EndPoint Security v8 since last August. Kaspersky now comes to Endpoint Security v10. It took about 3 months for compliance in ISE Module to allow the NAC Agent to recognize KESv10. But now, when we connect I get an error from the NAC stating bascially that the version of installed KES is no posture installation rules and he can't do anything. (see attachment for the exact wording)

  I remember when we first set up the ISE, there was a screen that broke down the different manufacturers of AV and the different versions that would support ISE/NAC. I have no idea where it is now.

  How to I update my sanitation/policies/rules to take account of two KES10 including, or simply change to allow version 8 +, or even ANY version?

  I'm sure this is a simple solution, but I can't find it. I looked through a lot of documentation, and I even looked through a PDF of global laboratory on-site ISE posturing, and he can find.

  Thank you

  Dirk

  Unfortunately, there are various known bugs related to the use of the browser "bad" that have been around for a while

• Cisco ISE posture assessment and client provisioning

  Hello

  I have the Cisco ISE and Cisco IOS device. I configured the RADIUS between these devices.

  Also, I configured RADIUSbetween ISE of Cisco and Cisco ASA. Now I want to know that how to posture assessment for these devices (ISE of Cisco and Cisco ASA or ISE Cisco Cisco IOS). Please give me the steps together for assesment for cisco ios device posture in Cisco ise.

  In addition, please give me related to posture assessment and the provisioning client logs.

  Thanks in advance.

  You can go through the list link below to download a PDF link

  Assessment of the posture with ISE.

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/CZ/expo2012/PDF/T_SECA4_ISE_Posture_Gorgy_Acs.PDF

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• Authentication (Windows Server 2013) AD Cisco ISE problem

  Background:

  Has deployed two Cisco ISE 1.1.3. ISE will be used to authenticate users wireless access admin WLC and switches. Database backend is Microsoft running on Windows Server 2012 AD. Existing Cisco ACS 4.2 still running and authenticate users. There are two Cisco WLCs version 7.2.111.3.

  Wireless users authenticates to AD, through works of GBA 4.2. Access admin WLC and switches to the announcement through ISE works. Authentication with PEAP-MSCHAPv2 access and admin PAP/ASCII wireless.

  Problem:

  Wireless users cannot authenticate to the announcement through ISE. This is the error message '11051 RADIUS packet contains invalid state attribute' & '24444 Active Directory failed because of an error that is not specified in the ISE'.

  

  Conducted a detailed test of the AD of the ISE. The test was a success and the result seems fine except for the below:

  xxdc01.XX.com (10.21.3.1)

  Ping: 0 Mins Ago

  Status: down

  xxdc02.XX.com (10.21.3.2)

  Ping: 0 Mins Ago

  Status: down

  xxdc01.XX.com

  Last success: Thu Jan 1 10:00 1970

  March 11 failure: read 11:18:04 2013

  Success: 0

  Chess: 11006

  xxdc02.XX.com

  Last success: Fri Mar 11 09:43:31 2013

  March 11 failure: read 11:18:04 2013

  Success: 25

  Chess: 11006

  Domain controller: xxdc02.xx.com:389

  Domain controller type: unknown functional level DC: 5

  Domain name: xx.COM

  IsGlobalCatalogReady: TRUE

  DomainFunctionality: 2 = (DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003)

  ForestFunctionality: 2 = (DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003)

  Action taken:

  Log Cisco ISE and WLC by using the credentials of the AD. This excludes the connection AD, clock and AAA shared secret as the problem.

  (2) wireless authentication tested using EAP-FAST, but same problem occurs.

  (3) detailed error message shows below. This excludes any authentication and authorization policies. Even before hitting the authentication policy, the AD search fails.

  12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response

  11808 extracted EAP-response containing EAP - MSCHAP VERSION challenge response to the internal method and accepting of EAP - MSCHAP VERSION such as negotiated

  Evaluate the politics of identity

  15006 set default mapping rule

  15013 selected identity Store - AD1

  24430 Authenticating user in Active Directory

  24444 active Directory operation failed because of an error that is not specified in the ISE

  (4) enabled the registration of debugging AD and had a look at the logging. Nothing significant, and no clue about the problem.

  (5) wireless tested on different mobile phones with the same error and laptos

  (6) delete and add new customer/features of AAA Cisco ISE and WLC

  (7) ISE services restarted

  (8) join domain on Cisco ISE

  (9) notes of verified version of ISE 1.1.3 and WLC 7.2.111.3 for any open caveats. Find anything related to this problem.

  10) there are two ISE and two deployed WLC. Tested a different combination of ISE1 to WLC1, ISE1 to WLC2, etc. This excludes a hardware problem of WLC.

  Other possibilities/action:

  1) test it on another version WLC. Will have to wait for approval of the failure to upgrade the WLC software.

  (2) incompatibility between Cisco ISE and AD running on Microsoft Windows Server 2012

  Did he experienced something similar to have ideas on why what is happening?

  Thank you.

  Update:

  (1) built an another Cisco ISE 1.1.3 sever in another data center that uses the same domain but other domain controller. Thai domain controller running Windows Server 2008. This work and successful authentication.

  (2) my colleague tested in a lab environment Cisco ISE 1.1.2 with Windows Server 2012. He has had the same problem as described.

  This leads me to think that there is a compatibility issue of Cisco ISE with Windows Server 2012.

  
  

  
  

  Yes, it seems that 1.1.3 doesn't support Server 2012 as of yet.

  External identity Source OS/Version

  Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2003 R2 32-bit and 64-bit

  Active Directory Microsoft Windows 2008 32-bit and 64-bit

  Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2008 R2 64-bit only

  Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2003 32-bit only

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.PDF

• Cisco ise license command

  I have a question

  1. is it possible to install the Cisco ISE software on the server machine to physical HP (without solution VMware or without the use of SNS-3415-k9 cisco device)?

  2. for 2500 users online, I'll order L-ISE-BSE-2550, L-ISE-PLS-S-2500 and L-ISE-APX-S-2500 of basis, more and apex licenses. My question is HA (primary and secondary) application I need 2 licenses for each? (2 * L - ISE - BSE - 2550, 2 * L - ISE - PLS - S - 2500 and 2 * L - ISE - APX - S - 2500)

  or just a license for each is enough?

  3. If I implement Cisco ISE and HA on VMware environment, can I 2 L-ISE-VM-K9 licenses for each VM machines? and also I need 2 licenses for each basic, plus, and at the apex?

  4. What is smart net Cisco and Cisco SASU? need to buy these for support and ticketing system?

  5. What is license for cisco anyconnect (L-AC-APX-1 year-G)?

  thnx in adv.

  You can install ISE on a HP ONLY Server if you are using software virtualization (VMware or KVM).

  The Guide of Installation of ISE sets out three options:

  1 hardware appliance from cisco SNS

  2. virtual machine VMware

  3 Linux KVM.

  The AnyConnect license is required to qualify with the features of the Apex. It is not installed on the ISE server, however.

• Cisco ISE 1.3 question Active Directory

  Hi people

  I'm having a problem with our Cisco ISE and would love some comments or a solution. I configured to ISE to use our Active Directory setup and so far it seems to be functional. I could connect to retrieve ad groups and use AD for authentication. The problem I encounter is that when I try to go to the ' Administration > Identity Management > Sources external page and select our instance AD in the window side left hand screen hangs and won't load.  Any advice?

  ad_error.PNG

  

  You are using a supported browser and have you tried an alternative one?

  If you are using a supported browser, it looks like a bug in the layout of the page. I was opening, in this case, a case of TAC. I had this same work of page very well for me in the three different 1.3 deployments.

• Session of endpoint on Cisco ISE 2.1

  Hello

  I installed 2.1 ISE with patch 1.

  I have a question about the session on Cisco ISE calendar.

  If a n receives an Access_Accept message for an endpoint, ISE installs a session that is visible on the Live session section.

  If endpoint disconnects from the network, which is the time-out for this session?

  Is it possible to set this timer?

  I try to put an end to the session with the CoA on Live Session Action, but this action fails because my switch does not support cost.

  So I reboot Cisco ISE and after its reloading, the session is deleted.

  In a case that it is not possible to use the feature of 'end', is it possible to delete the session in some other way?

  Thanks in advance

  Antonio

  Hi Antonio,.

  • Completed sessions are cleaned up 15 minutes after the end.
  • If there are authentication, but no accounting, these sessions are deleted after an hour.
  • All idle sessions are cleaned after seven days.

  But your n should send account opening and stop the message for the best operation.

  For the manual uninstall, you can use under method as shown in the link I pasted. You can consult the section "withdrawal embusked sessions.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-4/api_ref_guide/API _...

  Also, you might be interested in the discussion below:

  https://communities.Cisco.com/thread/61587?start=0&TSTART=0

  Kind regards

  Kanwal

  Note: Please check if they are useful.

• Cisco ISE 1.1.1 with Windows posturing

  Hello

  We tired for configured windows posturing here's the scenario

  We saw five ise boxes 3315 with version 1.1.1 off them 2 is admin, 2 is PS and 1 MNT

  and we have local Symantec and WSUS Server.

  We make posturing for Windows where I have a few questions

  (1) is there an integration here of the local WSUS server with Cisco ISE where Cisco ISE can automatically take all the mandatory WSUS update according to the crititcality of the WSUS server.

  (2) what is advised to set up the strategy of the Posture of the posture of windows in Cisco ISE and if manually configure windows political posture using specific KB and if there is an update available on Microsoft will we be able to configure the policy for the new update.

  (3) we have configured authentication dot1x in cisco ise and asked as well as on switch port where once the user must be connected to dot1x port of the switch it invites username and password dot1x and therefore, authorization policy, it gives vlan appropriate dynamics.

  But what are the ways where we can restrict the machine which is rather than the assets of the company and even if the user's user name and password in short any employee aware how we can restrict the user making the machine rather than the assets of the company?

  (4) can configure US policy posture for antivirus which will keep us in normal mode and at the same time, we can put posturing for windows which monioring mode which only monitor policy posture and reflected in the monitoring, log in which does not restrict the network for windows posturing

  That will be great if any one can please help me to get the issues

  Thank you

  Pranav

  What follows is under the POLICY-OF ELEMENTS of STRATEGY-POSTURE-> REQUIREMENTS > >

  

  What follows is located under

  POLICY OF-> ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY-> POSTURE->

  REPAIR-> WINDOWS SERVER UPDATE SERVICES REMEDIATION ACTIONS

  

  What follows is part POLICY-> POSTURE

  

  These settings work ALMOST flawlessly for me by forcing her we approved on our WSUS server for our group of workstations updated (all of our laptops are members of the) which meet the criteria of severity EXPRESS (critical and Important). Now, what I've discovered in the last few days is that... MS seems a bit random in their identification of what severity level they assign to their updates. For example... I think that a service pack of the operating system would be considered IMPORTANT if not CRITICAL... however... Look at this from the identification of the server WSUS from Windows 7 Service Pack 1:

  

  Thus, those who updates you deleted, I'd go throgh your WSUS server to identify how they are identified by gravity, then according to your needs set the parameters of the ISE accordingly to ensure that you get updates you plan.

  Hope this helps everyone out there who has similar problems.

  Thank you

  Dirk

• Cisco ISE with GANYMEDE + and RADIUS both?

  Hello

  I'm wired opening of authentication on a network using Cisco ISE. I studied the conditions for this. I know that I need to enable the RADIUS on the Cisco switches on the network. The switches in the network are already programmed to GANYMEDE +. Anyone know if they can both operate on the same network at the same time?

  Bob

  I suppose that Ganymede is configured (with ACS 4.x or 5.x) for the peripheral administration via telnet/ssh, and now you need the RADIUS (radius) to authenticate 802. 1 x. Yes they can both work on the same network at the same time.

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• Access VPN ASA and cisco ISE Admin

  Hello

  Currently I'm deployment anyconnect VPN Solution for my client on ASA 9.2 (3). We use the ISE 1.3 to authenticate remote users.

  In the policy stipulates the conditions, I put the condition as below.

  Policy name: Anyconnect

  Condition: DEVICE: Device Type Device Type #All Device Types #Dial - in access EQUALS AND
  RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type is equal to virtual

  I'm authenticating users against the AD.

  I am also restrict users based on group membership in authorization policies by using the OU attributes.

  This works as expected for remote users.

  We also use the ISE to authenticate administrators to connect to the firewall. Now what happens is, Cisco ASA valid also against policy, administrators and their default name Anyconnect.

  Now the question is, how to set up different political requirement for access network admin and users the same Firewall VPN.

  Any suggestions on this would be a great help.

  See you soon,.

  Sri

  You can get some ideas from this article of mine:

  http://ltlnetworker.WordPress.com/2014/08/31/using-Cisco-ISE-as-a-generic-RADIUS-server/

• Cisco ISE 1.2 and the ad group

  Hello

  I have Cisco ISE installed on my EXSi server for my test pilot. I added several ad groups at ISE as well.

  I created a condition of authorization policy, that is WIRELESS_DOT1X_USERS (see screenshot)
  Basically, I just replicate the default Wireless_802.1X and added Network Access: EapAuthentication, Equals, EAP - TLS.

  My problem is, I have been unable to join the wireless network, if I added my ad group to the authorization strategy (see screenshot). The user I is a member of WLAN USERS. If I removed the authorization policy group, the use is able to join the wireless network.

  I have attached the screenshot of ISE newspapers as well. I checked the ISE, AD/NPS, WLC, laptop computer time and date, and they are all in sync.

  I also have the WLC added as NPS client on my network.

  I checked the newspaper AD and I found it, it was the local management user WLCs trying to authenticate. It is supposed to be my wireless user Credential is not the WLC.

  It's the paper I received from the AD/NPS

  Access denied to user network policy server.

  Contact the server administrator to strategy network for more information.

  User:

  Security ID: NULL SID

  Account name: admin

  Domain account: AAENG

  Account name: AAENG\admin

  Client computer:

  Security ID: NULL SID

  Account name: -.

  Full account name: -.

  OS version: -.

  Called Station identifier: -.

  Calling the Station identifier: -.

  NAS:

  NAS IPv4 address: 172.28.255.42

  NAS IPv6 address: -.

  NAS identifier: RK3W5508-01

  NAS Port Type: -.

  NAS Port:                              -

  RADIUS client:

  Friendly name of client: RK3W5508-01

  The client IP address: 172.28.255.42

  Information about authentication:

  Connection request policy name: Windows authentication for all users use

  The network policy name: -.

  Authentication provider: Windows

  Authentication server: WIN - RSTMIMB7F45.aaeng.local

  Authentication type: PAP

  EAP Type:                              -

  Identifier for account: -.

  Results of logging: Accounting Information was written in the local log file.

  Reason code: 16

  Reason: Authentication failed due to incompatibility of user credentials. The provided username is not mapped to an existing user account or the password is incorrect.

  Hello

  The problem is with what ISE name, it's choosing to search of the AD. If you look in the ISE newspapers down, you'll see the username that use ISE (firstname, lastname) to search for the AD.

  In your certificate template see what attribute containst name AD (possibly the dns name or email or the name of principle of RFC 822 NT), go to your profile to authenticate cerificate and use this attribute for the user name.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.