Cisco ISE posture assessment and client provisioning

Similar Questions

• Cisco ISE 802.1 X Client Provisioning

  Hello

  I have a customer requirement ISE provisioning for Windows and mac. I have the following configuration:

  1 2 SSID, comments and employees

  2. guest of free access

  3. employee is 802.1 x eap-peap (name of user and password)

  I was wondering if the client local administrator privilege is required for 802.1 x windows client provisioning? Consider me it necessary for MAC OS however not too sure if it may be required for Windows?

  Example employee a. connect the SSID and redirection to the web portal of comments. During his connection, they will be presented with the device registration portal. To be presented by the ISE on the wizard of supplication, they will be asked for administrator/local domain admin privilege install wizard begging package/supply agent successfully?

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Yes, you need admin rights to install agent

• Cisco ISE 2.0 and WLC 5508 with 7.6.130.0

  I have looked on the release notes and compatibility n for ISE 2.0 and have not seen the answer to that. For the WLC 5508, the minimum AirOS is 7.0.116.0 but he limited the AAA authentication and support for comments. The recommended version of AirOS is 8.0.121.0.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/2-0/compatibility/ISE _...

  What airos 7.6.130.0? I know that AirOS release works with 1.3 and 1.4, even if they show the same support for version 2.0. I'm just afraid that something may have changed with 2.0. I am concerned only about the AAA authentication and guest access. No BYOD, posture or MDM is necessary.

  No change. Works well.

• Cisco ISE 1.2 and the ad group

  Hello

  I have Cisco ISE installed on my EXSi server for my test pilot. I added several ad groups at ISE as well.

  I created a condition of authorization policy, that is WIRELESS_DOT1X_USERS (see screenshot)
  Basically, I just replicate the default Wireless_802.1X and added Network Access: EapAuthentication, Equals, EAP - TLS.

  My problem is, I have been unable to join the wireless network, if I added my ad group to the authorization strategy (see screenshot). The user I is a member of WLAN USERS. If I removed the authorization policy group, the use is able to join the wireless network.

  I have attached the screenshot of ISE newspapers as well. I checked the ISE, AD/NPS, WLC, laptop computer time and date, and they are all in sync.

  I also have the WLC added as NPS client on my network.

  I checked the newspaper AD and I found it, it was the local management user WLCs trying to authenticate. It is supposed to be my wireless user Credential is not the WLC.

  It's the paper I received from the AD/NPS

  Access denied to user network policy server.

  Contact the server administrator to strategy network for more information.

  User:

  Security ID: NULL SID

  Account name: admin

  Domain account: AAENG

  Account name: AAENG\admin

  Client computer:

  Security ID: NULL SID

  Account name: -.

  Full account name: -.

  OS version: -.

  Called Station identifier: -.

  Calling the Station identifier: -.

  NAS:

  NAS IPv4 address: 172.28.255.42

  NAS IPv6 address: -.

  NAS identifier: RK3W5508-01

  NAS Port Type: -.

  NAS Port:                              -

  RADIUS client:

  Friendly name of client: RK3W5508-01

  The client IP address: 172.28.255.42

  Information about authentication:

  Connection request policy name: Windows authentication for all users use

  The network policy name: -.

  Authentication provider: Windows

  Authentication server: WIN - RSTMIMB7F45.aaeng.local

  Authentication type: PAP

  EAP Type:                              -

  Identifier for account: -.

  Results of logging: Accounting Information was written in the local log file.

  Reason code: 16

  Reason: Authentication failed due to incompatibility of user credentials. The provided username is not mapped to an existing user account or the password is incorrect.

  Hello

  The problem is with what ISE name, it's choosing to search of the AD. If you look in the ISE newspapers down, you'll see the username that use ISE (firstname, lastname) to search for the AD.

  In your certificate template see what attribute containst name AD (possibly the dns name or email or the name of principle of RFC 822 NT), go to your profile to authenticate cerificate and use this attribute for the user name.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Cisco ISE Posture compliance

  Hello!

  Is anyone know about Cisco ISE?

  I have a problem with the respect of the Posture. I installed the NAC Agent on PC, Catalyst 2950, and ISE. Authentication is great, but the Posture of compliance does not. I'll send you information if you want to help me.

  Thank you!

  Catalyst 2950 does not support costs (RADIUS permission change) which is required for enforcement to work: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0.4/compatibility/ise104_sdt.html#wp55038

• Cisco ISE with GANYMEDE + and RADIUS both?

  Hello

  I'm wired opening of authentication on a network using Cisco ISE. I studied the conditions for this. I know that I need to enable the RADIUS on the Cisco switches on the network. The switches in the network are already programmed to GANYMEDE +. Anyone know if they can both operate on the same network at the same time?

  Bob

  I suppose that Ganymede is configured (with ACS 4.x or 5.x) for the peripheral administration via telnet/ssh, and now you need the RADIUS (radius) to authenticate 802. 1 x. Yes they can both work on the same network at the same time.

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• CIsco ISE with HP and Fortigate

  Hello

  I configured the switches HP 5820 X and 5130 for authentication radius AAA with Cisco ISE 2.0.0.306.

  The switch receives the response from authorization successful; but unable to connect. What are the Advanced profile Radius authorization attributes in

  ISE?

  In addition, ISE supports Fotigate firewall?

  Oh and Yes ISE supports any device using the RADIUS in accordance with rfc, it is usually only a question about this that av-pairs to send to that specific device, there is not really standard for this.

• Only Cisco NAC Posture assessment ongoing support?

  Hi all

  Cisco does not seem to support the continued study of posture when running out of band or band? What I mean is after authentication during the approval of phase I've been assigned to a role and function to the role that I will receive a result of posture, if that result is pass then Ive been evaluated as a healthy end point and receive a certificate. Then the switchport to which I am connected is assigned to the company VLAN. Subsequently up to what my certificate expires system will always think that I am in good health.

  Ive crossed the 4.8 release notes, he still seems not to be supported?

  Your comments are appreciated.

  Dumlu

  I think this is mentioned in the release notes; did you check the next section?

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/NAC/appliance/Release_notes/48/48rn.html#wp1105597

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• Cisco ISE - eap-peap and eap - tls

  Hello

  Does anyone have an example of a policy of ISE, where from a WLC authentication requests can be processed by TLS and PEAP?

  I don't seem to get that working, I however do the accident of ISE application with my config that is not the idea.

  If peap uses this identity source, if tls uses 'this profile of authentication certificate '.

  THX

  Don't need to do in politics

  Can create a sequence identity and understand that it contains a certificate OmniPass profile and identity store

  Administration > identity management > identity Source sequences

  Can then select and define the Certfiicate authentication profile for OmniPass based certificate and a list of authentication search

• POSTURE of ISE Cisco + Client Provisioning - 2.1

  Hello classmates

  I have a situation with an implementation of posture on Ise 2.1.

  When I try to perform a posture, everything works fine when I set up and enable the customer to commissioning.

  When I disable the anyconnect client provisioning policy did not find "server policy" and dnt start posture.

  the Configuration of the customer strategy is required to launch a posture on the client machine?

  Thank you!!!

  Yes, client provisioning is required.

  In the CP strategy, will check for any download of connect module and posture.

  It works in cascade with the rule of the posture.

  Concerning

  Gagan

  PS: rate if this can help!

• Evaluation of posture transmitted by mistake using Cisco ISE

  Hi all

  I would like to help try to understand why a customer who has not been connected to the network for a little over a month has allowed full network access despite being older than 28 days AV definitions.

  We have 2 mandatory requirements of posture,

  1 Symantec Av MUST be installed

  2. the definitions AV MUST be expired LESS THAN 28 days

  Currently, the machine I have watch the defs AV as being 25 March 2013.

  When I produce the detailed report posture, it shows me even that the two mandatory requirements described above were successfully which means that the endpoint is compliant posture. Clearly this is not the case if...!

  Is there anything else I can check on the ISE to help debug this?

  Mario

  Hello

  You may have two problems:

  1 al ' ISE, you have a set global clients not supported of the NAC Agent (Android, etc.) that specifies what their default state of compliance. If the default setting is "consistent" and you do not have a rule in this customer service or you simply do not have client provisioning rules, any machine that does not fit in the provisioning rule (IE thinks them ISE which is not supported) Gets a consistent event compliance status if NAC Agent is installed and that the rules are not met.

  2. problem of ANC Agent version?

  I saw in the papers that you use NAC 4.9.1.6 agent but the latest NAC Agent recommended to be used with (later) ISE is version 4.9.0.51.

  4.9.1.6 is a version of NAC Appliance and Cisco does not guarantee that is 100% compatible with ISE.

  Check

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html#wp78131

  Cisco NAC Agent Interoperability Between NAC Appliance and Identity Services Engine (ISE)
  Cisco supports different versions of the NAC Agent for integration with  NAC Appliance and ISE. Current releases are developed to work in either  environment, however, interoperability between deployments is not  guaranteed. Therefore, there is no explicit interoperability support for  a given NAC Agent version intended for one environment that will  necessarily work in the other. If you require support for both NAC  Appliance and ISE using a single NAC Agent, be sure to test NAC Agent in  your specific environment to verify compatibility.
  Unless there is a specific defect or feature required for your NAC  Appliance deployment, Cisco recommends deploying the most current agent  certified for your ISE deployment. If an issue arises, Cisco recommends  restricting the NAC Agent's use to its intended environment and  contacting Cisco TAC for assistance. Cisco will be addressing this issue  through the standard Cisco TAC support escalation process, but NAC  Agent interoperability is not guaranteed.
  Cisco is working on an approach to address NAC Agent interoperability testing and support in an upcoming release.
  

• Issue of Posture 1.3 Cisco ISE.

  Hi all

  Small issue: assessment of posture for ISE customer how you configure ISE to use several AV vendors?

  Example: I have configured ISE posture rating for Sophos AV definitions that works well, if I have introduced another provider of antivirus for the posture of the client assessment does not pass compliance because she's trying the two AV vendors? How do you ensure ISE verifies and marks as consistent customer for each suite AV?

  Clients use AnyConnect V4.

  Thanks in advance for any response.

  Actually, after checking I don't think you can use two terms consisting of the VA, in another State, so you will need to create it using both your requirements in the same requirements, and then select "any condition to succeed", only problem is that you can have as a repair action, which can be a problem.

• ASA Anyconnect and Posture assessment

  Hello

  I have read the configuration guide Cisco ASA VPN ASDM 7.2 and also the Anyconnect Client Admin Guide 4.1 and can't find a clear answer as to how to implement assesment of endpoint.

  I see options for the use of the Module of Posture AnyConnect, HostScan and Secure Desktop. They appear on the page to download the Cisco software as

  separate downloads be prédéployées customers. I have a client who wishes to also VPN connections without client on the SAA to have an evaluation of the endpoint.

  I don't know what software to use three options, or how it should be deployed to the client, or client VPN connection. If anyone has all the answers to what precedes, or can point me to a link with the information, I would be grateful.

  Thank you

  Jim

  Without client by definition means we do not have any software installed on the client. So the Module of Posture AnyConnect can not be used for Clientless SSL VPN.

  HostScan and Secure Desktop are modules of execution if they can be invoked for connections without client.

  Note that this are not very actively developed and will probably eventually deprecated. Cisco tries to refer clients to a solution complete including the ISE and the AnyConnect ISE Posture of the AnyConnect Client module option ensure complete mobility.

• Access VPN ASA and cisco ISE Admin

  Hello

  Currently I'm deployment anyconnect VPN Solution for my client on ASA 9.2 (3). We use the ISE 1.3 to authenticate remote users.

  In the policy stipulates the conditions, I put the condition as below.

  Policy name: Anyconnect

  Condition: DEVICE: Device Type Device Type #All Device Types #Dial - in access EQUALS AND
  RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type is equal to virtual

  I'm authenticating users against the AD.

  I am also restrict users based on group membership in authorization policies by using the OU attributes.

  This works as expected for remote users.

  We also use the ISE to authenticate administrators to connect to the firewall. Now what happens is, Cisco ASA valid also against policy, administrators and their default name Anyconnect.

  Now the question is, how to set up different political requirement for access network admin and users the same Firewall VPN.

  Any suggestions on this would be a great help.

  See you soon,.

  Sri

  You can get some ideas from this article of mine:

  http://ltlnetworker.WordPress.com/2014/08/31/using-Cisco-ISE-as-a-generic-RADIUS-server/

• Cisco ISE 1.1.1 with Windows posturing

  Hello

  We tired for configured windows posturing here's the scenario

  We saw five ise boxes 3315 with version 1.1.1 off them 2 is admin, 2 is PS and 1 MNT

  and we have local Symantec and WSUS Server.

  We make posturing for Windows where I have a few questions

  (1) is there an integration here of the local WSUS server with Cisco ISE where Cisco ISE can automatically take all the mandatory WSUS update according to the crititcality of the WSUS server.

  (2) what is advised to set up the strategy of the Posture of the posture of windows in Cisco ISE and if manually configure windows political posture using specific KB and if there is an update available on Microsoft will we be able to configure the policy for the new update.

  (3) we have configured authentication dot1x in cisco ise and asked as well as on switch port where once the user must be connected to dot1x port of the switch it invites username and password dot1x and therefore, authorization policy, it gives vlan appropriate dynamics.

  But what are the ways where we can restrict the machine which is rather than the assets of the company and even if the user's user name and password in short any employee aware how we can restrict the user making the machine rather than the assets of the company?

  (4) can configure US policy posture for antivirus which will keep us in normal mode and at the same time, we can put posturing for windows which monioring mode which only monitor policy posture and reflected in the monitoring, log in which does not restrict the network for windows posturing

  That will be great if any one can please help me to get the issues

  Thank you

  Pranav

  What follows is under the POLICY-OF ELEMENTS of STRATEGY-POSTURE-> REQUIREMENTS > >

  

  What follows is located under

  POLICY OF-> ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY-> POSTURE->

  REPAIR-> WINDOWS SERVER UPDATE SERVICES REMEDIATION ACTIONS

  

  What follows is part POLICY-> POSTURE

  

  These settings work ALMOST flawlessly for me by forcing her we approved on our WSUS server for our group of workstations updated (all of our laptops are members of the) which meet the criteria of severity EXPRESS (critical and Important). Now, what I've discovered in the last few days is that... MS seems a bit random in their identification of what severity level they assign to their updates. For example... I think that a service pack of the operating system would be considered IMPORTANT if not CRITICAL... however... Look at this from the identification of the server WSUS from Windows 7 Service Pack 1:

  

  Thus, those who updates you deleted, I'd go throgh your WSUS server to identify how they are identified by gravity, then according to your needs set the parameters of the ISE accordingly to ensure that you get updates you plan.

  Hope this helps everyone out there who has similar problems.

  Thank you

  Dirk