Cisco Nexus 5548UP switch current Version 5.2 (1) N1 (4)

Hi, we are currently have Cisco Nexus 5548UP switch current Version 5.2 (1) N1 (4)

It is not listed as affected version:

Known affected releases:
(5)
5.2 (1) N1(8A)
6.0 (2) N2 (5)
7.0 (3) N1 (0.125)
7.0 (4) N1 (1)
7.1 (0) N1 (0.349)

The fixed versions known as follows:

Known fixed releases:
(7)
6.0 (2) N2 (4.3)
6.0 (2) N2(5A)
7.0 (1) ZN (0.615)
7.0 (5) N1 (0.173)
7.0 (5) N1 (1)
7.1 (0) N1 (0.371)
7.1 (0) N1 (1)

It needs to be updated to the latest versions?

If Yes, what version of the fixed known better adapt our current version

Cisco Nexus 5548UP switch current Version 5.2 (1) N1 (4)

Thank you.

Advertisement

I had the same question, so I opened a folder of TAC to find the version of the software. I was told that the software listed as available in the bug report are versions of NX - custom OS and that there was no version patched for the 5548p. The support engineer also said that the updates of Nexus 5 k should not until November or December. The best advice I could get was to subscribe to the bug report and wait to be notified of an available upgrade.

Tags: Cisco Tools

Similar Questions

  • Cisco Nexus 1000v switch

    Hi, I have 2 questions about the Switch Cisco Nexus 1000v.

    First of all, why use it rather than the standard vswitch distributed?

    Second, if an environment currently works using distributed vswitches, what are the impacts and the problems likely to introduce a Switch Cisco Nexus 1000v? Is there a process for the upgrade?

    See you soon

    Here is a comparison for the most up-to-date between the optioins network:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9902/solution_overview_c22-526262.PDF

    The great driver with most of the people running the 1000v I talked to is give visibility to the network team and streamlining changes made to the virtual network environment. In a great organazation with a network operations team, they will create an IVR to route a new VLAN, and then create the new VLAN on all switches distribution and access in the area of layer 2, just 1000v allows them to move forward and it create on the hypervisor using a set of commands that they already know.

  • Cisco Nexus 1000V Virtual Switch Module investment series in the Cisco Unified Computing System

    Hi all
    I read an article by Cisco entitled "Best practices in Deploying Cisco Nexus 1000V Switches Cisco UCS B and C Series series Cisco UCS Manager servers" http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9902/white_paper_c11-558242.html

    A lot of excellent information, but the section that intrigues me, has to do with the implementation of module of the VSM in the UCS. The article lists 4 options in order of preference, but does not provide details or the reasons underlying the recommendations. The options are the following:

    ============================================================================================================================================================
    Option 1: VSM external to the Cisco Unified Computing System on the Cisco Nexus 1010

    In this scenario, the virtual environment management operations is accomplished in a method identical to existing environments not virtualized. With multiple instances on the Nexus 1010 VSM, multiple vCenter data centers can be supported.
    ============================================================================================================================================================

    Option 2: VSM outside the Cisco Unified Computing System on the Cisco Nexus 1000V series MEC

    This model allows to centralize the management of virtual infrastructure, and proved to be very stable...
    ============================================================================================================================================================

    Option 3: VSM Outside the Cisco Unified Computing System on the VMware vSwitch

    This model allows to isolate managed devices, and it migrates to the model of the device of the unit of Services virtual Cisco Nexus 1010. A possible concern here is the management and the operational model of the network between the MSM and VEM devices links.
    ============================================================================================================================================================

    Option 4: VSM Inside the Cisco Unified Computing System on the VMware vSwitch

    This model was also stable in test deployments. A possible concern here is the management and the operational model of the network links between the MSM and VEM devices and switching infrastructure have doubles in your Cisco Unified Computing System.
    ============================================================================================================================================================

    As a beginner for both 100V Nexus and UCS, I hope someone can help me understand the configuration of these options and equally important to provide a more detailed explanation of each of the options and the resoning behind preferences (pro advantages and disadvantages).

    Thank you
    Pradeep

    No, they are different products. vASA will be a virtual version of our ASA device.

    ASA is a complete recommended firewall.

  • issue of Nexus 5548UP architecture base

    Hello community,

    Displays first - time researcher long

    Could a system architect or a person of vSphere networking experienced respond with a few thoughts on my theoretical network design below.  Please think not too technically specifications of each component other than the Nexus:

    Background:

    • I have a SAN (FC)
    • I have 8 Gbps FC HBA for 3 ESXi 5.0 servers that I currently run
    • I have multiple Cisco core switches more elders (4506, 4510) - max 1 Gbps fiber - * sigh - upgrade will talk later.
    • I have a few 3750 s Cisco for redundancy
    • Currently, I did NOT sufficiently put at my disposal of fiber ports

    Question:

    I did research on various methods to stimulate my backbone of fibre to accommodate my environment more and have developed the wth the Cisco Nexus 5548UP.  This seems to be appropriate switch in what ways to 'UP' Unified Ports that can be configured individually to run 1 Gbps and 10 Gbps FC for network 8, 4, 2 or 1 Gb/s FC to the SAN (among other options) connectivity.  Here's the datasheet if the link is allowed to send:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps11681/index.html

    Should I not I can attach my SAN FC HBA to the Nexus to manage all my needs of SAN (my SAN provider said it will be seen by the HBAs via a switch when the targets are correct), while at the same time to connect to my existing network of the base to the Nexus on I have configured network (FC ports Uplonk trunk)?  I'm assuing the vCenter maintains routing necessary to serve requests for these virtual machines / servers on the network.  (Please assume this networking within vSphere and on switches are configured correctly).

    Is currently the throughout of Ethernet and iSCSI (software initiators) but I get my game and scalability - so the fiber portion must still be purchased/deployed.

    I have already excluded the Cisco MDS 4198 optionally because it only manages SAN - no network.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10703/index.html

    I just want to be sure that all talk properly with this configuration.

    I am mixes answers through different providers, but I think that it "s because they were not in the VMWare environment to see what I'm asking.  Some say FC and Ethernet won't talk to each other on the same switch (which is understandable) - but I do not know what matters in the world of vSphere/vCenter.  This my question.

    Here are the crude diagram:

    3 X ESXi 5.0 w / 8 Gb/s FC HBAS each-> 5548UP-> SAN Nexus

    ports of routers base CF Gbic (unfortunatley LC and SC mix)-> link 5548UP

    Someone at - it try?  Seems pretty likely to me, but I am certainly learning.

    Thank you

    Alex

    RTCRM,

    You are right.  The 5548UP can also manage Ethernet and FC set up / running on the same 5548UP at the same time.  With the correct configuration and licensing, this switch will handle both simultaneously and efficiently.

  • help required for cisco nexus 1000v

    Hello

    I have three esxi host in my environment and I want to integrate these hosts with cisco nexus 1000v switch.

    I installed vsm on host1 and adding the remaining host via vsm Update Manager. exchanges I have already create in SMV shown in the welcome that I've added to the vsm, but the port group is not shown on the host1 esx on which I have installed vsm, should I also add the host that contains MSM in the cisco nexus switch?

    I want to say that I have installed the MEC on any army three esxi. is it good?

    Hi Mohsin,

    Where did you read that? In the past, we have added the guests, including one who executes the VSM. Usually run us both VSMs (primamry and secondary) and add anti rules affinity so that the two VSMs are on different hosts. I'm not a person CISCO, but having worked with CISCO engineers, we had no problem with what you have just mentioned. It would really be a waste of host in my opinion. I don't see why this could be a problem... As long as you have all your trade (PGs for your packages VSM etc etc) in place, you should be able to add all hosts in my experience.

    Follow me @ Cloud - Buddy.com

  • Switch Cisco Nexus 6004 removes more than 300 bytes IP packets

    Hi all

    We have a circuit of wave level 3 10 G running between two switches Cisco Nexus 6004. The circuit came online between our two data centers (in the same city) without problem.

    When attempting to ping to the remote-end 10G interface, it works very well with packets of 64 bytes. CDP is enabled and that we see the CDP information remote switch. However, if we increase the size of the ping to more than 300 bytes packets, we lose 1 in every 20.

    We settings MTU verifed, type of cable of 10G and duplex settings.

    Level 3A tested clean and we will move forward with more testing.

    Any ideas on the problem? We feel the carrier out and end to test with their testers. But so far, the circuit's own test. I was not sure if it is something related to Cisco. I am at a loss at the moment.

    Thank you.

    Mike

    Hi Mike,.

    There is nothing wrong with your switches or circuit.  NEXUS devices have a default COPP on the control plan that limit the size and the amount of traffic that must be the CPU process.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/switches/Datacenter/SW/6_x/NX-OS/security/configuration/guide/b_Cisco_Nexus_7000_NX-OS_Security_Configuration_Guide__Release_6.x_chapter_011001.html

    HTH

  • Cisco Nexus switches

    I'm looking to deploy a series 5100 Cisco NEXUS switch at 10 Gbps.

    I know that the Nexus is supposed to work with the converged network adapter (for 10 Gbps FCoE, etc.), but can it operate without an ANC?

    I want to put some passthrough 10 Gbps modules in my Dell m1000 chassis and the cables directly to the Nexus switch.

    I know that the Nexus is perhaps overstated for this solution, but it is a step in the UCS solution for us.

    Thoughts?

    James

    Hi, you don't need special drivers for "low latency" 10 Gbit ethernet on a 5 k.

    for example, to switch non-nexus 5 k

    PING 10.10.10.1 (10.10.10.1) 56 (84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes of 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 255 time = 0,530 ms

    64 bytes of 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq = 2 ttl = 255 time = 0.618 ms

    and a nexus 5000 with a qlogic 8152

    PING 172.16.78.3 (172.16.78.3) 56 (84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 172.16.78.3: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 128 time = 0.150 ms

    64 bytes from 172.16.78.3: icmp_seq = 2 ttl = 128 time = 0,134 ms

    Oracle rac cluster will fly!

  • Nexus 5548UP uplinks to the Catalyst 4510R

    I design my entirely 10g data center access layer with a pair of 5548UP switches in an EvPC and a pair of double hosted 2232PP FEX. I need to be able to uplink my pair of 5500 s up to my pair of classic 4510R aggregation switches. Each 4510R has two supervisors SUP of v, each with two ports 10g X 2. I have a trunk double 10g in a port between each 4510R channel.

    What is the ideal method for uplink to the 5500's to 4510R switches? Like many, I understand that one of the two ports of 10 g on each V Sup can be active. I should double home each 5548 to each 4510R STP and let it do its thing? I am able to do it with my SUP of V? And if so, I've always will be able to junction ports dual 10g in a port between the two switches 4510R channel? I need to maintain a large pipe between the regular for my campus traffic aggregation swithces which do not cross to the data center.

    Thank you!

    Well since you cannot cluster the 45K as a virtual switch (Cisco with new sup will start the supported VSS in the 4500 try to check which sup exactly and if you get like this will make a significant improvement in your design)

    Anyway the only method you can use currently is the traditional way, which is a function of STP (use rapid-PVST)

    each N5K use a separate link for each 45K and STP will be on links in blocking mode

    However, you could do some STP design and vlan for load sharing where you can send the vlan x more link1 and vlan y b at 45 K using cost PLEASE link

    HTH

  • Cisco Nexus 3548/3524 SNMP Interface traffic problem

    Hi all!

    I would like to share with you the problem I've encountered SNMP interface respect tracking on the Cisco Nexus 3500 of traffic devices.

    We is transferring our network infrastructure in the Nexus and we encountered a problem with the interface bitrate of tracking traffic on Nexus 3548: deltas SNMP counter ifHCInOctets and ifHCOutOctets show no valid data.

    We have investigated this issue and figured he could be linked with the refresh rate of the meter.
    I measured, by snmpwalk, the time between simple increments the counter ifHCInOctets to Interface VLAN and it apears to about 140seconds. But for physical interfaces (Eth), the interval of interface SNMP counters are 15 seconds and with sampling frequency of the 1960s for the queries we can still observe the problems on graphs (see attached screnshot).

    We get the same results when testing the question on various physical devices (3548 Nexus) on versions of different software - including the last being.

    And for Ethernet interfaces (same NMS - ZABBIX-config):

    We tested a wide Huawei s6700 switches and the range of Cisco IOS devices and there is no such problems.

    The main problem is that we cannot monitor our crucial nexus, via SNMP devices (as you can see from the attached chart).  Results are the same when configure us Cacti or Zabbix to monitor Nexus devices.

    The results of this monitoring not having meritorical value or use.

    We are working on this case with Cisco TAC, and they manage to reproduce the problem in their LAB environment. But for now, they cannot provide any solution and they claim that this isn't a bug. If we get any final statement for this case, I'll post here for your information.

    I'll be more than happy if you can post ideas that help me solve the problem described.

    Thank you in advance!

    Michal

    Looks like a bug to me.  His return of erroneous data.

    Maybe try asking your file be traced back to the team leader.

  • Cisco Nexus 5596 does not start after NX-OS upgraded from 5.1.3.N1.1 to 6.0.2.N2.5 [CSCun66310]

    Hello friends,

    I want just to save your valuable time & effort, while Nexus 5596 upgrades so I wanted to share some useful information that you can have a quick glance before your Cisco Nexus 5596 device updates.

    Recently, I ran into trouble when upgarding 5596 Nexus data center switch does not boot and after investigation of the Cisco TAC it comes out to be Bug described below.

    https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCun66310/?reffering_site=dumpcr

    My way of upgrading the device was: 5.1 (3) (1) to 6.0 (2) N2 N1 (5).

    As this upgarde involves an upgrade of Bios and power purposes, I had some doubts to get this properly upgraded, but he had more twist involved in this upgrade I got to know after contacting Cisco TAC for my death 5596 Nexus device and got info if you have version impacted in your Nexus 5596 device and you plan to upgrade , then you migh RUN in this serious BUG aftre which device will not come at all and only Option left is to replace with device of RMA.

    Material affected PID versions Versions updated

    UCS-FI-6296UP                                            1.0                                       1.1

    N5K-C5596UP                                              1.0                                        1.1

    N5K-C5596T                                                 1.1                                         1.2

    You can check with hardware version command from your device below.

    5596 # display sprom sup | H/W Inc.

    H/W Version: 1.1

    So please be careful when you plan your Nexus 5596 update and check over things that this Bug is not present anywhere in the docuemntations upgrade unfortunately.

    Hope this will help and save valuable time of a person.

    This bug affected me. Before upgrade you the equipment, to track:

    It's procedure, there will be no allocation to apply.
    Is attached to the case of the dplugin for each NXOS, check out the name associated with each version.
     
     
    Step 1
     
    -------------------------------
    Copy the file dplugin and update, load Plugin
    Copy the ucd - update.tar to the bootflash
    Copy the debug plugin into the bootflash
    Load the image via the load control
     
     
    Note You can access the command line without leaving the plugin to debug via command vsh
     
    Example:
     
    n5K-1 # dir bootflash:. grep debug
    3023275 23 Jan 15:28:48 2013 ucd - update.tar
    283423 23 Jan 15:12:28 2013 nuova-or-dplug - mzg.5.2.1.N1.5.bin
    n5K-1 # load bootflash:nuova - or - dplug - mzg.5.2.1.N1.5.bin
    Loading of plugin version 5.2(3a)
    ###############################################################
    WARNING: debug plugin is for engineering for internal use only!
    For reasons of security, plugin image has been removed.
    ###############################################################
    Debugging properly load-plugin!
    Linux (Debug) #.
     
     
     
    Step 2
     
    -------------------------------
    After you load the dplugin file into NX - OS, please follow the steps to update the module of TI.
     
     
    Copy the ucd - update.tar of bootflash to the tmp directory and unzip the file
     
    Linux (Debug) # cp /bootflash/ucd-update.tar/tmp
     
    Linux (Debug) # cd /tmp/
     
    Linux (Debug) # tar - xvf ucd - update.tar
     
    UCD.bin
     
    Address_91_A.csv
     
    Address_92_A.csv
     
    Linux (Debug) #.
     
    Step 2
     
    ----------------------------------
     
    Run the ucd.bin file:
     
    Linux (Debug) #./ucd.bin
     
     
     
    You will see the prompt on the version 1.1 update.
     
    --------------------------------------------------
     
    principal: correctly upgraded TI inst 2 to version 5.
     
    New SPROM HW version 1.1. Charging must reflect in 'show the sprom' output.
     
    Release Linux (Debug) #.

    The problem is how to get the plugin. Only Cisco can provide this.

  • Update Virtual Center 5.0 to 5.1 (using Cisco Nexus 1000V)

    Need advice on upgrading production please.

    current environment

    Race of Virtual Center 5.0 as a virtual machine to connect to oracle VM DB

    3 groups

    1: 8 blades of ESXI 5.0 IBM cluster, CLuster 2: 5 IBM 3850 x 5

    2 cisco Nexus 1000v of which cluster only 1 use.

    I know that the procedure of upgrading to 5.1

    1. create DB SSO, SSO of installation

    2 upgrading VC to 5.1

    3. install WEB CLient set up AD authentication

    IT IS:

    I have problems with the Nexus 1000? I hope the upgrade will treat them as he would a distributed switch and I should have no problem.

    He wj, treat the Nexus as a dVS.

  • Cisco Nexus to use authentication Radius AAA using Microsoft 2008 NPS

    I have a Nexus 7010 running

    I was wondering if you can help me with something. I'm having a problem with the approval of the order through our aaa config. We have not an authentication problem of command approval that does not work. From what I've seen and read Nexus NX - OS 6.x has not all orders for the aaa authorization, unless you configure GANYMEDE +. My basic config is below if you can help would be much appreciated.

    > ip source interface mgmt radius 0

    > key RADIUS-server XXXXX

    > host X.X.X.X key radius server authentication XXXXX accountant

    > RADIUS-server host X.X.X.X XXXXX key authentication accountant aaa

    > authentication login default group aaa authentication Radius_Group

    > RADIUS server logon group console local aaa Radius_Group

    > server X.X.X.X

    > server X.X.X.X

    > mgmt0 interface-source

    Also nobody how to configure Microsoft 2008 NPS as Raduis server to work with Nexus? I read a few post that suggests to change the

    Shell: roles = "vdc-admin" in the value field of the attribute in the RADIUS server

    Anyone know if it works?

    Thank you

    I haven't used NPS before but sounds like you are on the right track. As Ed mentioned in his post, GBA, you can set the type of protocols that you will accept during an authentication session. Authentication Nexus sessions is considered as PAP/ASCII, so you should be good to go. I don't have a Nexus switch to test with, but if you can use wireshark to capture the session and see the exact protocol / method used. However, I am sure that PAP is the way to go:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/Datacenter/SW/4_1/NX-OS/se...

    I also found the link that you might find useful:

    http://www.802101.com/2013/08/Cisco-Nexus-and-AAA-authentication.html

    Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

  • Cisco Nexus with vSšhere Enterpise?

    Is it possible install Cisco Nexus on vSphere4 with license of the company?

    I heard he'd be Enterpise more

    Thank you

    One company more supports distributed, required by the software Cisco Nexus switches. According to KB http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1010579.

  • Doubt sober licenciamento Cisco Nexus 1000V

    Algume pode me dar uma luz como works o licenciamento sequence Cisco Nexus 1000V?

    I have a cluster of 8 hosts com 4 processors hexacore, esx 3.5.

    Good afternoon Romeu.

    O recurso CISCO NEXUS e licenciado a parte e voce so you can use-lo com a versão o more VMware vSphere Enterprise edition. O Preço image para licenciamento CISCO NEXUS $ 695.00 por processador e.

    Para maiores information, you can access site o produto:

    http://www.VMware.com/products/Cisco-Nexus-1000V/

    Veja has comparison between NEXUS o e recursos other Soluções como vSwitch ESX 3.5:

    http://www.VMware.com/products/vNetwork-distributed-switch/features.html

    Espero ter colaborado.

    Att.

    Brahell

  • To Cisco Nexus VSM VEM

    Hello

    When I try to go Cisco Nexus VSM the MEC connect get lost and never come back to the top again.

    We have configured uplink port profile as mentioned in the Cisco Document "Install the Cisco Nexus 1000V software". Then, we added three profile more port for control and administration of the package VLAN. But as soon we will the NIC1 (control) of the connection to the lost GET VEM VSM and MEC never appears again.

    -We missed to add the system of virtual local area network for the uplink port profile and the profiles of port for control and Packet of Cisco 1000V network.

    Make a long story short - VSM can now be connected and also tied the MEC. But we constently receive messages "KERN-1-SYSTEM_MSG: a fall received executives of MSM in double - core" as soon as we add a second physical NETWORK adapter to the uplink port group.

    Someone at - it a tip would be what is the problem?

    THX

    Tom

    Tom,

    I was able to recreate what you see. The problem is that just to add another NIC to the uplink without going through the uplink configured for a kind of switch teaming causes issues. Because the N1KV is essentially a switch she expected all NIC teaming to be a port channel or vPC - HM (virtual host port-channel mode). This must be set in the profile of uplink port. When you attach a second NETWORK card without going through the proper switch configuration, you can get the packets of streaming double and a host of other issues. This is why the MSM is complaining.

    I don't know a lot about the 3010. If it only supports a port-channel vPC - HM is the way to go. vPC - HM will create a port channel virtual between the network cards on two different switches without having to make any changes on the physical switches. As long as the switches supported the CDP and the ports are configured the same it should work.

    Louis

Maybe you are looking for

  • My iPhone 6 is erratic when outdoors

    My iPhone 6 is now 1.5 years, upgrade 9.3.5 just a few days. Most of the day, I'm in my own environment of Home/Office Wi - Fi and the phone works perfectly. Yesterday (and today as well), when outside, with my phone trying to find a connection Wi -

  • Virtual PC and XP mode

    Hello I want to use XP mode in Virtual PC but error message as your cpu is not taken care of virtuliziation, really need your help. I run Windows 7 64 bit Ultimate edition x

  • With a point of foot to cut support it?

    I am running Native Instruments 'Battery' in MainStage, control everything with a keyboard and a Drumkat percussion controller. I want to be able to cut a note support (choke note) with a foot switch, similar to a function of starter of Charleston. A

  • Welcome to nginix virus

    While trying to access Yahoo or Facebook, am getting otherwise empty with screen "welcome to NGINIX" on this subject.  Virus analyses anything bad.  How can I remove this virus?  Using Vista. Thanks in advance

  • Move from Vista to Win 7 - multiple computers

    I just bought an another Win 7 Home Premium to upgrade three of my computers Vista to Win7. Only, I bought a package.  How and where to go (url please) I can easily and cheaply buy the two additional product keys?


HashFlare