Cisco RV110W
Hi all
I have the following question: I have 3 router CISCO rv110w. One of them is the most important for me is in my warehouse. The other two are in my shop. I want to do the first router (in-store) to the vpn server and the other two to be its vpn customers. Can you explain in detail how to proceed.
Thanks in advance
Dear Lubo,
Thank you to the small community of Support Business.
Please refer to the following document for a "VPN client" configuration on routers RV110W; "
http://sbkb.Cisco.com/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&PID=2&app=search&VW=1&articleid=2501
For a step by step over procedure detail consult the Administrator's guide, p.96;
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/RV110W/Administration/Guide/rv110w_admin.PDF
I hope you find this information useful and please let us know if there is any other assistance, we can help you.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Rodriguez S... : | :. : | :.
Support Engineer Cisco client
* Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
Cisco RV110W supports up to 1 VPN policies
Best regards
I use a router Cisco RV110W to 20 natoinwide of branches with a central site for interconnection, however, although VPN correctly between a branch and the central location it is not possible to add another tunnel in the RV110W to another secondary site (see photo)
In the data sheet RV110W it is said that this router supports up to 5 VPN tunnels, but apparently these 5 tunnels are supposed to establish via the software QuickVPN from a computer.
so: is there a real limit to VPN site to site (router to router) 1 with RV110W?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Please contact Cisco,
The RV110w supports only 1 site to tunnel
Of the data sheet:
1 tunnel IPSec Site to Site
The RV130W will allow 10 site to site tunnels, datasheet below:
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/small-business-...
Best regards
-
Fall of connection Cisco RV110W
Hi guys,.
I was wondering if someone could help me,
I bought a box of Cisco RV110W about a month ago and finally got around to setting up, but I have connection problems and have to reboot the box to make it work again, I am currently under the latest version of the firmware 1.2.0.10.
I have a PPPOE connection on the WAN port with the correct credentials as the status page shows my IP address internet and WAN light is green, I have also 4 VLAN is configured.
Trying to access the router outwardly I can't and I have to ask someone to restart while I can, but after a few minutes it will start to play. Y at - it somewhere I can access log files to see if the connection is down on the router.
Thanks, Nick
I am pleased to hear that it was a simple solution as the MTU. :)
I believe you must have a syslog server to obtain complete connects (especially when you have a problem of blocking/restart as you did), although looking at the logs incoming and outgoing can be good for the basic diagnostic. I hope that you can never look at the logs, now that everything works!
-
AnyConnect licenses for Cisco RV110W
Hi all
Thank you in advance for taking the time to respond - I tried for the last hour and seek more information on the AnyConnect client for an entry level firewall - CiscoRV110W, but I'm still confused.
To say simple things, my questions are:
If I buy this firewall of entry-level VPN connections supports 5 + 5, can users download the AnyConnect client and connect to the VPN for free (once it is set up), or do I have to pay extra for the AnyConnect licenses? How much would that cost?
My experience with AnyConnect has been so far limited to the end user, use it to connect to the network through the VPN at work, but now I take into account set up something similar for a small office with a few teleworkers.
Connection of the device:
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/RV110W-wireless...
I already read the FAQ for AnyConnect, but it is still is not clear.
Thank you for your time!
Hi mmihai.toma,
As far as I know, is not supported on devices RV Anyconnect. If you want to use Anyconnect you must have a Firewall ASA or IOS, router IO - XE.
According to the documentation it looks like the only VPN options for the device of RV are: quick VPN, Site to Site, and PPTP.
It may be useful
-Randy-
-
Hello
I have a router Aztech DSL1015EW (S) and Cisco RV100w. Here's my setup.
Phone - RJ11---> DSL1015EW (S) - RJ45---> RV110W
-J' tried to build the portable computer remote VPN connection to RV110W (failed)
-Also failefk quick VPN
-PPTP failed
Port forwarding on DSL1015EW
I don't have the public ip address
I use dydns.
What can I do? Please help me.
Fast VPN error message is "bridge not answer do you expect ot.
PPTP error code is cannot estiblishe to the remote host.
Hello
Hi, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I left the community of support to small businesses.
I apologize for your stress, in this case I advise you to check this link with useful information about the VPN fast https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29399
I hope you find this answer useful,
"* Please mark the issue as response or write it down so others can benefit from.
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodríguez Miranda.
Support of Cisco network engineer.
-
Hello
Is it possible to configure the router via CLI (command line interface)
In other Cisco devices, we could always just insert a configuration through the CLI.
However, it seems that it is only possible with the Webbrowser.
Kind regards
Tom
Tom,
N ° the RV110W can only be configured via a web browser. There is no support for this router command line interface.
Chris
-
Configuration VPN Cisco RV110W.
Hello
We have a new RV100W router. I would like to use it for iPhone, PC and MAC for you connect via IPSec (QuickVPN) or PTTP.
Whenever I go to the VPN configuration, it tells me that I need to set up a 10.x.x.1 network. How can I use VPN without doing?
Thank you!
Hi bndbrennan,
Try to change the IP address, set up your VPN clients, and then restore the IP 192.168.1.1. The reason for which the router wants to change is because there are so many routers out there that have 192.168.1.1. If you always try to connect from one of these routers, the connection will fail. We see a lot of people that use 192.168.2.1 and it works fine.
-
I am installing a Cisco RV110W router in my network, currently I have a service contract with TalkTalk broadband, which uses PPOA to connect to the internet. They advised me to put the router in that had mode bridged, what I've done. Te router that they provided is a D-Link DSL-2680.
After plugging the ethernet to the WAN of the Cisco port cable and port LAN 1 of the D-link I can't get the Cisco to initialize the internet.
I select the PPPoE function in the Cisco router, however, when you use the D-Link router, it's usually a PPoA VC Mux connection. It doesn't seem to be an option to select a PPPoA connection in the Cisco router.
When it try to connect there is no response from my modem/router in Bridge mode.
I would use the Cisco router with my current router in this way. If this is not possible, I would like to give the address IP of Cisco have all computers on the network through the Cisco route before arriving to the internet enabling my firewall and access control setting etc to work. I don't know if this would work but that I would use the VPN and QoS options on the cisco too.
Is it possible to have the D-link router/modem function normally and connect the LAN of the D-Link port to the LAN/WAN port on my new cisco to achieve without forcing cisco to connect to the internet and to recognize the connection?
Any help is very appreciated.
Here you can see the Cisco GUI; Launch the emulator from device online
The different subnet mask thing that should not be, it was just to avoid having two routers using the same network, which has taken care of by changing the 2680 to 192.168.0.1.
You're right about the strange gateway on the WAN connection, it should be 192.168.0.1 (2680). I think it might be the problem, because your pings are never power the 2680, the RV110W routing table sends those 192.168.0.2 for some reason any.
I'm going to put in place here at home so I can go on it as well, in the average to make sure that you have power cycled at least once, and you might want to try resetting the RV110W and setting up again (what you have done so far has been correct) sound silly I know but sometimes things just stuck.
I put the same scenario here right now, and I'll see if I can make it work.
Oh and the only ping you were missing was the 2680 WAN IP address, but since you can't even ping the router LAN port, it, it won't work anyway, so don't worry it.
-
Problem comments RV110W wireless network access
Hi all!
I am facing a problem that was not represent earlier, and I can't solve this...
We have a small business running an apartment as a business next door. To provide access for guests - separated from the SME network, that we have created a wireless network of comments on our CISCO RV110W router which worked well for months. But for more 2 weeks now on the network of comments simply do not accept the password set in the router management console - I tried to change it, but without any proogress, also restarted the router several times - no effect...
Anyone have a suggestion, what happens?
Details:
Updated firmware to update to the most recent available on CISCO's Web site. (1.2.0.10)
Screencapture of the basic Panel Wireless of the management console:
( http://i40.tinypic.com/2lm6x53.png )
Screencapture of the parameters of the management console Net comments:
( http://i41.tinypic.com/2lxilbc.png )
Password complexity checking is disabled, it cannot be the root of the problem.
And the error message we receive when you try to access internet from comments:
( http://i40.tinypic.com/ek21kx.png )
I don't know what to do, but hit my head against the wall...
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hi Pal, another thought perhaps to factory default from the router then see how it behaves. I see no reason why it work for so long, and then stops working unless perhaps something is damaged in the software.
Were there any configuration changes from when it works and now does not work? Add or remove of anything?
You can try to factory reset the router and see if it works then?
-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful -
RV110W inter-VLAN-routing is not possible
In Cisco RV110W, I set up 2 VLANS, a 192.168.1.xxx (Green Net) and the second with only a fixed address 192.168.2.100 192.168.2.xxx (Server), which is configured in the DMZ area. I enabled in Cisco "inter-VLAN-Routing", described "routing between separate VLANs on Cisco RV110W" I can Ping the server in a direktion, the other I got an error. It is just expected and ok! All other abilities expected work well!
Now, I want to see the Green network server. (firewall on the server is off)
I configured the network/router with exactly the values of the index and has been an error: "destination LAN IP may not be the same as the router's IP subnet.
Sorry, I don't understand this. Can anyone help?
Thank you in anticipation
Anton
If I understand correctly, you have a second vlan, 192.168.2.x. The RV110W is a member of this subnet so that's why we do not have a static route for something that the router knows that she welcomes this subnet.
-Tom
Please evaluate the useful messages -
Hello guru, VPN
I am running a little question here...
I have a router setup Cisco RV110W small business home. It has one of these HTML GUI interfaces, check all boxes, etc., to work things out. Basically, your typical home router with VPN. I activated the VPN, PPTP, added the password, and it has now automatically configured! I can successfully VPN home with a client of Windows7. Here's my problem, I now need VPN in my home router with a 2801. Is this possible? Everything I found on the subject was to configure a Cisco IOS router as a VPN server or "tunneling" to another router IOS. No example using an IOS router according to the client.
Any help would be wonderful. Thank you in advance, please
Eric
Hi Erick, the 2801 cannot be configured as PPTP Client. You should check if the RW110W allows you to configure Lan to Lan tunnels, and configure a L2L against your 2801. Or try to connect behind the 2801 with your PPTP client as you normally do.
I hope this helps.
Raga
-
I have a RV110, and I am interested to extend the reach of the WiFi using WDS function.
Simply indicates the data sheet RV110W... "can wireless be repeated signals by up to 3 compatible devices,"
Where can I find these "devices", and has anyone had success using WDS with any APs of the range of SMB products?
Thank you
Hello Chris,
All Small Business support WDS Access Points. You can take a look at the different models of AP here:
I have install WDS for several clients successfully.
The only thing to keep in mind is that, for each position (or access point) that you repeat until the line speed on the remote will be reduced by half.
Also several of thewireless routers support WDS, so you can use another RV110W for example.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Christopher Ebert
Network support - Cisco Small Business Support Center Engineer
* Please note the useful messages *.
-
VLAN a layer 2 switch, two WAP121 and RV110w
Hello
I try to configure the 4 VLANS in an office with 2 WAP121 and a RV110W, between the two is a switch POE from D-link DES-1210-28 P. I have a patch cable to the d-link to the router. How to configure the router so all VLAN light them well port on the router? Because soon I change the id VLANS on one of the SSID on the WAP121 I lose the connection to the internet and local servers for this SSID.
the switch is on on the ports of the WAP121 and the RV110W connected to untagged.
Best regards
Villy
You can call us at the 866-606-1866 in the Canada or the United States. If you are in another country, you will find your number for local support from the link below. Please have your CCOID (your Cisco.com user name) and the serial number of the RV110W of ability when you call.
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/Web/TSD-Cisco-small-business-suppor...
Kind regards
Mike.V
-
Configuration of VPN RV110W - please help
First of all, I would like to thank you for all the tips I have ever set up a VPN before.
I am looking for help on setting up a VPN connection to a remote device. I need to be able to connect from a laptop that could be in my office, home, or a hotel room in a city at random in North America. The RV110W will have a static IP address and the device behind him that I need to connect. What I need to know, I have to also take a RV110W with me when I travel to connect through a VPN for this device? Or can it be set up if I can connect from anywhere?
Hi Bill,
My name is Mehdi from the Cisco Technical Support.
Customer support RV110W VPN IPsec and PPTP, and you can connect from anywhere using QVPN client or a Windows-based PPTP client.
Before evrything, check if you have the latest firmware, if not here's the link to download the latest firmware: http://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283879340&software...
Latest firmware is 1.2.0.10
Here are the steps:
Solution 1: Configure PPTP
---> Under VPN--> VPN Clients enable the PPTP server
-IP address for the PPTP server: IP address of the PPTP server, for example if the router has the IP 192.168.1.1, we can have 192.168.1.200 (must be in the same subnet as the LAN and DHCP server)
-IP address for the PPTP Clients: will give the range of the IP address to clients, in my view, is of maximum 5 IP
-Under VPN--> Clients VPN--> VPN Client configuration table
-Click Add a line and add the user name and password to enable checkbox and choose PPTP
-Click the button Save
Now on the PC to configure the client, here's example:
http://www.strongvpn.com/setup_windows_7_pptp.shtml
Solution 2:
We need to download and install the client use IPsec QVPN QVPN from this link:
http://software.Cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283879340&software...
-On the router under VPN--> VPN Client--> add Row and do the same steps, but instead of PPTP, choose QVPN
-Also under firewall allow remote management on port 443
now on the client he will ask for username and password for the client who already configured on the router and the server, the server is the public IP address of the router's WAN interface
I hope that I was clear for these steps to configure the VPN, please rate and click on answer to help other client from cisco for more of her.
-
I'm trying to get a site to site VPN working between two routers RV110W, obviously in different places with different public IPs and different internal addressed IP networks.
For some reason, the IPsec Security Association gets 'established', but no traffic will travel between the two.
I use the "basic VPN setup" on routers and type in their respective information below.
Public IP have been replaced by x.x.x.x.
Router A:
Connection: - name -.
Key: - PSK-
IP / domain FULL: - public IP address of the remote site.
Local WAN: - local WAN.
Remote LAN: 10.151.238.0
Remote mask: 255.255.255.0
Local NETWORK: 10.151.237.0
Local mask: 255.255.255.0
Router b:
Connection: - name -.
Key: - PSK-
IP / domain FULL: - public IP address of the remote site.
Local WAN: - local WAN.
Remote LAN: 10.151.237.0
Remote mask: 255.255.255.0
Local NETWORK: 10.151.238.0
Local mask: 255.255.255.0
I am very confused.
Site A:
Public IP address
10.151.237.0/24 network
Cisco VPN Firewall RV110W
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'x.x.x.x\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: the proposed peer: 10.151.237.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.238.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: response to a proposal of fast Mode {msgid:6ecb39e8}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: us: 10.151.237.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.238.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0x2fadc90d ESP tunnel mode<0xa6393cfc xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.164.121\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp proposal d = AES (12) msgid:0779895 #3 _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0x8d260557 mode<0xad4da835 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0x8d260557 mode<0xad4da835 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:53 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request for e0: c9:7 has: 7 a: 3d:2 b b8:62:1f:51:ad:a9 BSSID
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: e0:c9:7 a: 7 a: 3d:2 b IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:ad:a9
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: received REQUEST from E0:C9:7 A: 7 A: 3D:2 B
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.237.5
' 2013-07-11 16:17:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_R2
2013-07-11 16:17:43 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: INFORMATION from 38:60:77:13:C0:48
Site B:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public IP address
10.151.238.0/24 network
Cisco VPN Firewall RV110W
2013-07-11 16:13:11 RV110W daemon.info httpd [22952]: Administrator 10.151.238.201 logined
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. PFKEY open, create socket 19
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: 1success is enabled
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: NAT-Traversal port 4500 floating off setting
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: port floating nat_t activation criteria = 0/port_float = 1
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version 0.6 c) [disabled]
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC_SSH of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_SERPENT_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_AES_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_BLOWFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_512 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_256 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: commissioning 1 cryptographic support
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6789]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: begun assistance pid = 6789 (fd:5)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface using Linux 2.6 IPsec on 2.6.22 code (experimental code)
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: Ok (ret = 0) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change directory \'/etc/ipsec.d/crls\'
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: empty directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: listen to IKE messages
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface ppp0/ppp0 10.151.238.200:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface br0/br0 10.151.238.1:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface eth1: 0 / eth1: 0 127.0.0.3:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface adding vlan2/vlan2 x.x.x.x:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. PFKEY 18 failed: no such file or directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: forget the secrets
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ': termination of SAs by using this connection
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: removal of State (STATE_MAIN_I2)
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\": removal of connection
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp #2 msgid:6ecb39e8 = AES proposal (12) _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: the proposed peer: 10.151.238.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.237.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: respond to the Quick Mode proposal {msgid:0779895 d}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: us: 10.151.238.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.237.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: keep refhim = 4294901761 to the course to generate a new key
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0xad4da835 ESP tunnel mode<0x8d260557 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:16:43 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request a BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72 cc:af:78:60:9e:9
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: cc:af:78:60:9e:9 a IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 A
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.105
2013-07-11 16:18:52 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:20:15 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST for 00:01:80:5 C: 98:B9
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.101
2013-07-11 16:13:11 RV110W daemon.info httpd [22952]: Administrator 10.151.238.201 logined
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. PFKEY open, create socket 19
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: 1success is enabled
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: NAT-Traversal port 4500 floating off setting
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: port floating nat_t activation criteria = 0/port_float = 1
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version 0.6 c) [disabled]
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC_SSH of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_SERPENT_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_AES_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_BLOWFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_512 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_256 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: commissioning 1 cryptographic support
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6789]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: begun assistance pid = 6789 (fd:5)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface using Linux 2.6 IPsec on 2.6.22 code (experimental code)
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: Ok (ret = 0) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): activation
: FAILURE (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change directory \'/etc/ipsec.d/crls\'
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: empty directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: listen to IKE messages
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface ppp0/ppp0 10.151.238.200:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface br0/br0 10.151.238.1:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface eth1: 0 / eth1: 0 127.0.0.3:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface adding vlan2/vlan2 x.x.x.x:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. PFKEY 18 failed: no such file or directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: forget the secrets
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ': termination of SAs by using this connection
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: removal of State (STATE_MAIN_I2)
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\": removal of connection
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp #2 msgid:6ecb39e8 = AES proposal (12) _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '\x.x.x.x\ '.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: the proposed peer: 10.151.238.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.237.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: respond to the Quick Mode proposal {msgid:0779895 d}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: us: 10.151.238.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.237.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: keep refhim = 4294901761 to the course to generate a new key
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0xad4da835 ESP tunnel mode<0x8d260557 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:16:43 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request a BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72 cc:af:78:60:9e:9
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: cc:af:78:60:9e:9 a IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 A
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.105
2013-07-11 16:18:52 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:20:15 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST for 00:01:80:5 C: 98:B9
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.101
Please help if you can.
Aaron,
When the tunnel is up, you can ping the LAN IP of the remote router? What type of traffic you are trying to send? What equipment and what device?
If you are trying to reach a PC through the tunnel, be sure that there is no firewall software blocking traffic between a different LAN. Repeatedly PCs will respond to connections on the same network, but not to a different subnet.
Please give us more information about what devices are involved and what they try to do.
-Marty
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can I share pictures and videos via Bluetooth to an android device?
mini iPad - 12.7 GB capacity I can't find a Bluetooth icon when I click the button share. And I can't share a photo from an even android device with a paired device. It is a problem for Apple in Myanmar because the internet connection is not very goo
-
have we not back up our data to an external device before the update to windows 8.1
have we not back up our data to an external device before the update to windows 8.1. update to windows 8 8.1 will affect the data in the laptop...
-
update the drivers of yoga are very old?
I have laptop 2 13 Yoga... I have downloaded/installed new driver for my laptop from lenovo.com Once installed (driver genius proffesional)... When the scanner for the new driver gives me 9 new update for the driver then installed (drivermax) to veri
-
Error codes 12, 31 - PXI my system does not work
I tried to solve the erros on my pxi system using the software compatibility MXI-Express BIOS 1.3 - Windows 7 64 bit/7 x 86/XP x 86/Vista Vista / x 86 x 64 This software is intended to solve error code 12 or 31 showing in windows Device Manager. But
-
W7 x 64 SP1 programs that require admin access stop responding
PC G560 Windows7 64 bit with SP1 (happened before SP1) Hello When logged in as a user if I click on anything that requires administrator privileges, the box is to enter the admin password, it does not matter if I get the password or if I click Cancel