Cisco VPN Client is blocking incoming connections
Hello
I somethimes (not always) a problem with the Cisco VPN Client.
As soon as the CISCO VPN Client is installed (it must not be running) it blocks inbound connections from the local network.
The problem is that I use Ultra VNC SC to support some of my clients. Another client is supported by Cisco VPN. With UltraVNC SC customer clients try to connect to my PC.
But if I installed the cisco VPN Client, no incoming connections are possible.
How can I change this behavior?
This behavior is not always the same. Last incoming connections of two months were possible, but from one day to another is not possible more.
I recently installed the Client, but it takes no effect :-(
I have NOT activated the firewall Cisco on the VPN Client and the behavior is NOT only if the Client is activated. This is the behavior even if it is NOT active and just installed.
Hi Chris,
Zone alarm is installed on the PC that is defective?
Try to restart the Cisco VPN service and launch the vpn client.
I remember having a similar problem with the Cisco VPN Client. Some conflict between the VPN client and Zone-Alarm, installed on the same PC.
The problem was with VSDATANT variables in the registry key.
Please see the following mail took from another forum:
http://www.OutpostFirewall.com/Forum/showthread.php?t=9917
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
VPN3015 + Cisco VPN Client 3.1 - IPSEC connection problems.
I have set up a VPN3015 and am using 3.1 Client on a Windows 2000 laptop. Dial my ISP and you connect through the client. I get a message "peer remote no longer" on the client. 3015 journal display the message "filter on interface 1, data missing peers x.x.x.x IKE dropped."
I have the filter set to '- None -' in the 'general' tab of the configuration of the group. I created an IKE and a company monitoring and makes sure they use pre-shared keys. I checked that the group name and the password on the client matches the 3015.
Any help or ideas would be appreciated.
Marv
Marv
You MUST have a filter defined on the interface to which you are connected through otherwise, you get the above message.
The filter is selected using a downs drag in the configuration of the Interface. The filters were created (from memory) somewhere of in policy management of-> traffic management.
Start by using the private network filter that allows any and then start to restrict once you have all this work.
I hope this helps. Regards, Barry
Barry Hesk
Network Manager
Notability solutions
-
PIX: Cisco VPN Client connects but no routing
Hello
We have a Cisco PIX 515 with software 7.1 (2). He accepts Cisco VPN Client connections with no problems, but no routing does to internal networks directly connected to the PIX. For example, my PC is affected by the IP 172.16.2.57 and then ping does not respond to internal Windows server 172.16.0.12 or trying to RDP. The most irritating thing is that these attempts are recorded in the system log, but always ended with "SYN timeout", as follows:
2009-01-06 23:23:01 Local4.Info 217.15.42.214% 302013-6-PIX: built 3315917 for incoming TCP connections (172.16.2.57/1283) outside:172.16.2.57/1283 inside: ALAI2 / 3389 (ALAI2/3389)
2009-01-06 23:23:31 Local4.Info 217.15.42.214% 302014-6-PIX: TCP connection disassembly 3315917 for outside:172.16.2.57/1283 inside: ALAI2 / 3389 duration 0:00:30 bytes 0 SYN Timeout
2009-01-06 23:23:31 Local4.Debug 217.15.42.214% 7-PIX-609002: duration of disassembly-outside local host: 172.16.2.57 0:00:30
We tried to activate and deactivate "nat-control", "permit same-security-traffic inter-interface" and "permit same-security-traffic intra-interface", but the results are the same: the VPN connection is successfully established, but remote clients cannot reach the internal servers.
I enclose the training concerned in order to understand the problem:
interface Ethernet0
Speed 100
full duplex
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP address xx.yy.zz.tt 255.255.255.240
!
interface Ethernet1
nameif inside
security-level 100
172.16.0.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
!
access extensive list ip 172.16.0.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.2.56 255.255.255.248
!
access extensive list ip 172.16.0.0 outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.2.56 255.255.255.248
!
VPN_client_group_splitTunnelAcl list standard access allowed 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0
!
IP local pool pool_vpn_clientes 172.16.2.57 - 172.16.2.62 mask 255.255.255.248
!
NAT-control
Global xx.yy.zz.tt 12 (outside)
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound
NAT (inside) 12 172.16.0.12 255.255.255.255
!
internal VPN_clientes group strategy
attributes of Group Policy VPN_clientes
xxyyzz.NET value by default-field
internal VPN_client_group group strategy
attributes of Group Policy VPN_client_group
Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
value of Split-tunnel-network-list VPN_client_group_splitTunnelAcl
xxyyzz.local value by default-field
!
I join all the details of the cryptographic algorithms because the VPN is successfully completed, as I said at the beginning. In addition, routing tables are irrelevant in my opinion, because the inaccessible hosts are directly connected to the internal LAN of the PIX 515.
Thank you very much.
can you confirm asa have NAT traversal allow otherwise, activate it in asa and vpn clients try again.
PIX / ASA 7.1 and earlier versions
PIX (config) #isakmp nat-traversal 20
PIX / ASA 7.2 (1) and later versions
PIX (config) #crypto isakmp nat-traversal 20
-
Problems to connect via the Cisco VPN client IPSec of for RV180W small business router
Hello
I tried to configure my router Cisco of RV180W as a customer VPN IPSec, but have encountered a problem that I hope someone can help me with. "" I managed to do the work of configuration so that the Cisco's VPN IPSec client authenticates successfully with the XAUTH user, I put on the router, but during the negotiation, the client ends with the following, which appears several times on the router error message: ' Mar 20 Oct 19:41:53 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for
> [34360] has no config mode. I've read around the internet and a number of people seem to say that the Cisco VPN Client is not compatible with the router, but the same thing happens to my iPhone VPN client.
Is it possible that this can be implemented? Below, I have attached the full configuration files and the log files. Thank you much in advance.
Router log file (I changed the IP
addresses > respectively as well as references to MAC addresses) Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: floating ports NAT - T with counterpart
> [44074]
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: notification to ignore INITIAL-CONTACT> [44074] because it is admitted only after the phase 1.
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for> [4500]
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for> [44074]
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: is located behind a device. NAT and alsoPeer is behind a NAT device
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: request sending Xauth for> [44074]
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for> [4500] - > [44074] with spi = >.
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REPLY' of> [44074]
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: login successful for the user "myusername".
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser connected from the IP>
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: Notify payload [10381]
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REQUEST' of> [44074]
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: ignored attribute 5
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28683
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no mode config
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28684
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no config mode
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for> [44074] has no mode config
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: remove the invalid payload with doi:0.
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: purged-Association of ISAKMP security with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi =>.
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser Logged Out of the IP>
Mar 20 Oct 20:03:16 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association deleted for> [4500] - > [44074] with spi = > The router configuration
IKE policy
VPN strategy
Client configuration
Hôte : < router="" ip=""> >
Authentication group name: remote.com
Password authentication of the Group: mysecretpassword
Transport: Enable Transparent Tunneling; IPSec over UDP (NAT/PAT)
Username: myusername
Password: mypassword
Please contact Cisco.
Correct, the RV180 is not compatible with the Cisco VPN Client. The Iphone uses the Cisco VPN Client.
You can use the PPTP on the RV180 server to connect a PPTP Client.
In addition, it RV180 will allow an IPsec connection to third-party customers 3. Greenbow and Shrew Soft are 2 commonly used clients.
-
Cisco vpn client is supported on the analogue ppp connection
can someone pls tell me if we can use the client vpn cisco on a ppp connection analog and put a pix that is not PPPs running. If it works, then why do we need to VPN L2tp/ipsec. can someone pls tell me something abt it. It is very urgent.
concerning
Assane
Assane,
If I understand your question, you speak with PPP initially to get an IP address from your service provider, then use the Client VPN VPN in your Pix Firewall. If so, yes it is possible.
To name a few reasons why PPTP or L2TP/IPSEC is used instead of Cisco VPN Client are:
1. because companies have used a PPTP or L2TP/IPSEC solution for some time and are migrating to Cisco VPN
2. do not install vpn on the PC client software
3. won't pay for the VPN Client software licenses
Let me know if it helps.
Kind regards
Arul
-
Unable to connect via the Cisco VPN Client
Hello
I have configured remote access VPN to ASA and tries to connect via the Cisco VPN Client 5.0
I am not able to connect and watch the journal on the SAA
ASA-3-713902: Group = xxxxx, IP = x.x.x.x, withdrawal homologous peer table is placed, no match!
ASA-4-713903: Group = xxxxx, IP x.x.x.x, error: impossible to rmeove PeerTblEntry
ASA does not support the K9 i.e. VPN - DES is enabled and VPN-3DES-AES is disabled.
What could be the reason.
Concerning
Hi, I had this same problem, here is the solution:
When you perform a debug crypto isakmp 255, so you see that the cisco vpn client does not support SHA +, you must use MD5 + AN or sha with 3DES/AES.
Be careful, this debugging is very talkative, but that's the only way I found to get ITS proposal on debugging.
Well, change your strategy using MD5 isakmp / OF would do the trick.
-
Unable to connect using the Cisco VPN client
Hi all. I recently configured a 5510 ASA to allow remote access using the Cisco VPN client. The problem is that everything works fine when I connect using a modem classic or on a computer with a public address that I use for testing purposes, but whenever I try to connect with on an ADSL line, I can't access to the resources. I have connection and after that nothing, I can not achieve anything.
I enclose the relevant configuration information in the attachment. Any help is welcome.
Depending on the version, add...
ISAKMP nat-traversal
or
ISAKMP nat-traversal crypto
Should be all you need.
-
Slow initial connection using Cisco VPN Client
I am currently using Cisco VPN Client v5.0.07.0290. Whenever I start my connection, it takes me about 90 seconds for the prompt to display authentication and another ~ 90 seconds to finish the auth. and connect successfully. I have another computer laptop w / the same WIN7 OS and version of Cisco VPN Client and he ends the connection to<30 sec. ="" why="" is="" this? ="" any="" suggestions="">
Hi Sergio,
You import the .pcf for the VPN Client file? If so, please try to recreate a new file .pcf locally on the machine itself and try to connect. Let me know how it goes.
Thank you
Delvallée
-
connect Cisco VPN client v5 to asa 5505
I have remote vpn configuration issues between ASA5505 and Cisco VPN client v5. Successfully, I can establish a connection between the client Vpn and ASA and receive the IP address of the ASA. Statistical customer VPN windows shows that packets are sent and encrypted but none of the packages is received/decrypted.
Cannot ping asa 5505
Any ideas on what I missed?
Try adding...
ISAKMP nat-traversal crypto
In addition, you cannot ping the inside interface of the ASA vpn without this command...
management-access inside
Please evaluate the useful messages.
-
Cisco vpn client to connect but can not access to the internal network
Hi all
I have a VPN configured on cisco 5540. My vpn was working fine, but suddenly there is a question that the cisco vpn client to connect but can not access to the internal network
Any help would be much appreciated.
Hi Samir,
I suggest that you go to the ASA and check the configuration to make sure that it complies with the requirements according to the reference below link:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml
(The link above includes split tunneling, but this is just an option.
Please paste the output of "sh cry ipsec his" here so that we can check if phase 2 is properly trained. I would say as you go to IPSEC vpn client on your PC and check increment in packets sent and received in the window 'status '.
Let me know if this can help,
See you soon,.
Christian V
-
Cisco VPN Client 5.0.0 does not connect
Hello
I am trying to establish the VPN session the firewall to 5525 X Cisco ASA crossing 9.1.1 Cisco VPN Client. Although AnyConnect is the way to go, the inherited method must always be supported for some time as part of a migration. I tried two VPN users (authenticated by ad) on two client computers running Windows 7 64 bit and Cisco VPN Client 5.0.07.0440. Both users are able to establish a session to a computer at the ASA, but not the other. Entering credentails evil, the login popup will appear immediately. On the combination of username/password correct name, the following VPN client log messages are generated and the session drops that is "not connected" in the status bar. The PCF file is the same on both client computers.
Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.07.0440
Copyright (C) 1998-2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Client Type(s): Windows, WinNT
Running on: 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
119 22:49:16.933 06/23/13 Sev=Info/6 IKE/0x6300003B
Attempting to establish a connection with 203.99.111.44.
120 22:49:16.939 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000001
Starting IKE Phase 1 Negotiation
121 22:49:16.942 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NON, ID, VID(Xauth), VID(dpd), VID(Frag), VID(Nat-T), VID(Unity)) to 203.99.111.44
122 22:49:16.973 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
123 22:49:16.973 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NON, ID, HASH, VID(Unity), VID(Xauth), VID(dpd), VID(Nat-T), NAT-D, NAT-D, VID(Frag), VID(?)) from 203.99.111.44
124 22:49:16.974 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000001
Peer is a Cisco-Unity compliant peer
125 22:49:16.974 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports XAUTH
126 22:49:16.974 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports DPD
127 22:49:16.974 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports NAT-T
128 22:49:16.974 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports IKE fragmentation payloads
129 22:49:16.977 06/23/13 Sev=Info/6 IKE/0x63000001
IOS Vendor ID Contruction successful
130 22:49:16.977 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK AG *(HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_INITIAL_CONTACT, NAT-D, NAT-D, VID(?), VID(Unity)) to 203.99.111.44
131 22:49:16.977 06/23/13 Sev=Info/6 IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
132 22:49:16.977 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000083
IKE Port in use - Local Port = 0xCA7C, Remote Port = 0x1194
133 22:49:16.977 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000072
Automatic NAT Detection Status:
Remote end is NOT behind a NAT device
This end IS behind a NAT device
134 22:49:17.000 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
135 22:49:17.000 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
136 22:49:17.211 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IPSEC/0x63700008
IPSec driver successfully started
137 22:49:17.211 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
138 22:49:23.207 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
139 22:49:23.393 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
140 22:49:23.393 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
141 22:49:23.393 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
142 22:49:23.401 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300005E
Client sending a firewall request to concentrator
143 22:49:23.401 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
144 22:49:23.427 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
145 22:49:23.427 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
146 22:49:23.427 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000010
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_ADDRESS: , value = 10.2.193.69
147 22:49:23.427 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000010
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_DNS(1): , value = 10.2.5.2
148 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000010
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_DNS(2): , value = 10.1.5.2
149 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SAVEPWD: , value = 0x00000000
150 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SPLIT_INCLUDE (# of split_nets), value = 0x00000001
151 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300000F
SPLIT_NET #1
subnet = 10.0.0.0
mask = 255.0.0.0
protocol = 0
src port = 0
dest port=0
152 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300000E
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_DEFDOMAIN: , value = example.org
153 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_PFS: , value = 0x00000000
154 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300000E
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = APPLICATION_VERSION, value = Cisco Systems, Inc ASA5525 Version 9.1(1) built by builders on Wed 28-Nov-12 11:15 PST
155 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SMARTCARD_REMOVAL_DISCONNECT: , value = 0x00000001
156 22:49:23.428 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = Received and using NAT-T port number , value = 0x00001194
157 22:49:23.445 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000056
Received a key request from Driver: Local IP = 10.2.193.69, GW IP = 203.99.111.44, Remote IP = 0.0.0.0
158 22:49:23.445 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK QM *(HASH, SA, NON, ID, ID) to 203.99.111.44
159 22:49:23.477 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
160 22:49:23.477 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_RESP_LIFETIME) from 203.99.111.44
161 22:49:23.477 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000045
RESPONDER-LIFETIME notify has value of 86400 seconds
162 22:49:23.477 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x63000047
This SA has already been alive for 7 seconds, setting expiry to 86393 seconds from now
163 22:49:23.477 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
164 22:49:23.477 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, NOTIFY:NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN) from 203.99.111.44
165 22:49:23.478 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, DEL) to 203.99.111.44
166 22:49:23.478 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000049
Discarding IPsec SA negotiation, MsgID=F3E3C530
167 22:49:23.478 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000017
Marking IKE SA for deletion (I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65) reason = DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED
168 22:49:23.478 06/23/13 Sev=Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
169 22:49:23.479 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000058
Received an ISAKMP message for a non-active SA, I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65
170 22:49:23.479 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(Dropped) from 203.99.111.44
171 22:49:24.310 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
172 22:49:26.838 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x6300004B
Discarding IKE SA negotiation (I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65) reason = DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED
173 22:49:26.849 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000001
IKE received signal to terminate VPN connection
174 22:49:26.855 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
175 22:49:26.855 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
176 22:49:26.855 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
177 22:49:26.855 06/23/13 Sev=Info/4 IPSEC/0x6370000A
IPSec driver successfully stopped
Any ideas why the second client of Windows 7 does not work?
Kind regards
Rick.
Rick
Thanks for the additional output. It shows the xauth authentication step, which is good to see. But it does not offer much clarity on what is causing the problem.
My attention is drawn to a couple of message on the balls that are in line with the two sessions for which you posted newspapers.
32 00:36:08.178 24/06/13 Sev = Info/5 IKE/0x6300005E
Customer address a request from firewall to hub
I'm not sure that we see any answer to this, but it makes me wonder if it is somehow involved in the issue. Is it possible that there is a difference in the configuration of firewall and operating between two clients?
I am also interested in this series of posts
48 00:36:08.210 24/06/13 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000056
Received a request from key driver: local IP = 10.2.193.69, GW IP = 203.99.111.44, Remote IP = 0.0.0.0
I don't know why the pilot requested a key at this point, and I wonder why the remote IP is 0.0.0.0?
It is followed by a package in which the ASA provides the value of the life of SA - which seems to be on the path to a successful connection. that is followed by
55 00:36:08.350 24/06/13 Sev = Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F
Received packet of ISAKMP: peer = 203.99.111.44
56 00:36:08.350 24/06/13 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000014
RECEIVING< isakmp="" oak="" info="" *(hash,="" notify:no_proposal_chosen)="" from="">
during which the SAA indicates that no proposal has been selected. It seems therefore that the ASA is not happy about something.
If we do not find indications of the client that allows to identify the problem, then maybe we look at the ASA. Are all log messages generated on the SAA during this attempt to establish VPN that could show us the problem? Would it not be possible to run debugs on the SAA in a trial of this machine?
HTH
Rick
-
Allow Cisco VPN Client through the firewall?
Hello
How can I allow a cisco VPN client work from the inside of our network to an external IP address?
We have customers who wish to make use of their Cisco VPN Client companies but our ASA blocks I think?
Also (sorry to ask) a friend in South America is having the same problem but I am not hink they use Cisco, is there a default port used by the client to Cisco? then I can send this info?
Thank you
Generally, the ASA will allow the IPSEC from the inside to outside traffic. This is when you want it came outside and connect to you - this is where it gets creative. You restrict outgoing traffic at all? You deny all ip/tcp/udp outgoing?
But may depend on if the remote end is compaitable NAT - T, and if they have configured. Another question would be how they allow VPN traffic go?
-
Cisco VPN Client anything cannot access through VPN on an ASA5505 8.4
Hello
Completely new to Cisco ASA and the need to get this working ASAP.
8.4 (1) ASA 5505 is the secondary FW and I need to authorize all out and block everything coming, but for the VPN clients. Since a jerk of Cisco, I used the ASDM and it's sorcerers to make this work, which may explain my situation.
192.168.101.0/24 is the local network
192.168.101.5 is the IP of ASA
192.168.101.2 is the primary FW (and the default gateway for servers, I have to access through the VPN)
10.10.101.0/24 is the VPN IP range (this can be what you want, I'm not married to it somehow)
My Cisco VPN Client connects to the ASA and receives 10.10.101.1 IP address, but I get no connectivity to the ASA or any other 192.168.101.x or service server (tried RDP, telnet, ping, etc.)
Configuration file is attached.
Help pretty please!
Thank you.
Did you add a route for the VPN Pool on the main firewall to the ASA?
Best regards
Peer
Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App
-
Cisco VPN Client causes a blue screen crash on Windows XP Pro (Satellite M30)
Hello
I have a Satellite Pro M30 running Windows XP Professional.
After you start a vpn Tunnel via a customer of Cisco VPN (Version 4.6 and 4.7), the system crashes with a blue screen.
I see that the key exchange is successful, but immediately after the vpn connection is established Windows XP crashes with a blue screen.
Someone has any idea how to solve this problem?
Perhaps by the updated device driver? And if so, which driver should be updated?
Kind regards
Thorsten
Hello
Well, it seems that the Cisco client is a problem.
I m unaware of this product because it of not designed by Toshiba.
I think that the drivers are not compatible with the Windows operating system.
However, I found this site troubleshooting cisco vpn client:
Please check this:
http://www.CITES.uiuc.edu/wireless/trouble-index.html -
windows\system32\vsinit.dll
I try to run CISCO "VPN Client" connect from my PC at home for my work PC.
Then, I get a message:
Validation failed for C:\WINDOWS\System32\VSINIT.dll
Any ideas?
Martin
Hello
Run the checker system files on the computer. Link, we can see: Description of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 System File Checker (Sfc.exe): http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310747
Note that: if he asks you the service pack CD, follow these steps from the link: you are prompted to insert a Windows XP SP2 CD when you try to run the tool on a Windows XP SP2 computer system File Checker: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900910 (valid for Service pack 3)
If the steps above is not enough of it please post your request in the TechNet forum for assistance: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/category/windowsxpitpro
Maybe you are looking for
-
I run windows XP on PC. A window Explorer windows asking me to update Firefox 21 popped up. The window includes a link 'more info' and a 'remind me later' and 'install' button. Never seen this style of notification before anything so I clicked and re
-
Pavilion 15 ab268ca: laptop HP Pavilion 15 5 GHz Wifi upgrade?
Model: HP Pavilion 15 ab268ca laptop (http://h20386.www2.hp.com/CanadaStore/Merch/Product.aspx?id=T0E05UA & opt = ABL & salt = NTB) Wireless card installed: (1 x 1) 802.11b/g/n and Bluetooth® 4.0 combo Hey guys! I recently bought this laptop new. Wi
-
Re: Installation of AOL on the laptop Satellite Pro A210-1 b 1
Hello I'm on AOL broadband - trying to install it on my laptop Toshiba - guard connecting the internal modem - I don't want to do - auto dial-up and additional costs. How to stop or disengage the interal modem - broadband is travel bt usb? Concerning
-
That's I have, once again, maybe speak for all owners of i1 when I say: What a fuck's happening? (Sorry, but I need to talk like that). What is happening with the loyalty with consumers? You sell a 'new' phone with an old operating system and it is n
-
connecting xbox 360 to the monitor through hdmi
I can't connect my Xbox 360 with hdmi on my monitor cord while the connection is correct. Thank you for helping me come.