closed the loop in IOM reorganization concept?

Similar Questions

• Why out of the loop after a managed exception is thrown

  I am trowing a custom exception inside a nested for loop. The execption notes, however, both the inner and outer loop output once the exception is thrown. I tried to add a continue statement, but that has not solved the problem.

  Jet moves execution of capture, closing the loop.  You can send a cancelable event instead.

• How to get the items on a loop at the same time during the execution of the loop for

  Hello

  I am a student. I would like to know how to get the outside loop counter values For in parallel so that the loop runs rather than obtaining the value finally outside the loop for future prospects for the answers.

  Thank you

  Frederick

  You already said yes, and you have said some of the different ways (registrants, locals, reference, queue, etc.). Since the information was provided to your request, the thread can be considered closed? If you want details about how to implement something, you must provide the details on what you are doing.

• high school: when closing the reference?

  Hi, just a quick question if anyone can it clearify I thank so much.

  I found the secondary example called "Simple Subpanel.vi" and he put an inactive during the loop to "hold" the front of the called vi, here, is the "plugin1.vi". (Sorry I am still not very clear why it must be slowed down while loop here.)

  

  However, if we put the vi 'close' after the while loop, like the one I changed, is there a chance that the vi will overflow from the memory of the PC after the long period of running? What is the difference between these two methods?

  

  Lets say, I load my VI in a secondary, then after it's in high school I want to show or hide the menu bar.  Can I use a node property to show or hide the menu bar of the VI in the secondary, but I can only do this by using the reference to the VI, if it has not yet been closed.  In this case, you don't want to close until you are done with it.

  You do not leave open indefinitely in both cases that you have demonstrated, so there is no memory problem with both methods of references.

• Too much time in the queue empty in the loop of consumption

  I'm working on a VI used to screen analog converters above temperatures from room temperature to 175 C.  I have it set in place with a producer and a consumer loop.  The loop of producer makes all the measures, while consumer loop allows you to write tests that all measures in a spreadsheet file. There are 23 steps taken and recorded every second.  The test is run for about 60 minutes.

  Initially, I had trouble with data in the queue being lost when I stopped the VI.  I fixed that by ensuring that the queue was completely empty before you stop the VI.  Now my VI will continue to work long after I pressed the stop button.  I let it run for up to an hour and finally abandoned the operation and still lost a large number of measures on the end of the queue.  From my reading on the forums, it's because of the overload to write to a file of measure.  Opening and closing of the file every second is any slowdown.

  I've seen examples of creating a table of measured data and only writing every 100 samples or more.  Can someone help me see how I could implement something like this in my code?  Is there another reason, it takes so long to write all my test data?

  Thank you

  Matt

  You must use the real file i/o functions.  That made the express VI to write files to measure opens the file, writing the data and then close it.  When you do this several times, you get a really slow performance.  If you must open the file before you consumer loop and close it after the loop.  You will then be able to write as much as you want inside the loop.  But now, you need to format the data yourself.

• While the loop Tunnel help

  I have a variable inside a while loop, that I want to access outside the loop, that is, in my VI, I have two indicators, one inside the loop and the other outside the loop.  The variable is incremented on each iteration.  However, I am not able to see this iteration of the loop.  I see that the last value of the variable.  Is there anyway for me to access the variable inside the loop as it is running.  In regards to my VI, is it possible for my indicator "inside" correspond to the indicator 'outside '?  Any help with this will be appreciated.  Thank you.

  Kind regards

  David

  Yes.  You must use a local variable of the 'Inside' indicator that writes to the indicator 'outside '.

  There are other ways to do so, such as pass the data via a queue or a notifier.

  The concepts of tunnels, flow of data, and that data is not available to that structure, it is finished, is all notions of LabVIEW.

• Headless Application Crash when closing the user interface

  For some reason, my application without head started crashing whenever the user interface is closed. Here is the stack trace that I get headless application when I close the user interface:

  Thread [1] (STOPPED) (Suspended : Signal : SIGSEGV:Segmentation fault)
      QHostAddressPrivate::clear() at qhostaddress.cpp:293 0x1822926c
      QAbstractSocket::disconnectFromHostImplementation() at qabstractsocket.cpp:2,714 0x18243466
      qt_static_metacall() at moc_qabstractsocket.cpp:154 0x18245fa8
      QAbstractSocket::qt_static_metacall() at moc_qabstractsocket.cpp:140 0x18245fa8
      QMetaMethod::invoke() at qmetaobject.cpp:1,664 0x196a47d8
      QMetaObject::invokeMethod() at qmetaobject.cpp:1,179 0x196a6334
      invokeMethod() at qobjectdefs.h:418 0x182421e0
      QAbstractSocket::disconnectFromHost() at qabstractsocket.cpp:2,609 0x182421e0
      QAbstractSocketPrivate::canReadNotification() at qabstractsocket.cpp:634 0x18244974
      QAbstractSocketEngine::readNotification() at qabstractsocketengine.cpp:168 0x18237a60
      event() at qnativesocketengine.cpp:1,159 0x1824aeba
      QReadNotifier::event() at qnativesocketengine.cpp:1,156 0x1824aeba
      QCoreApplicationPrivate::notify_helper() at qcoreapplication.cpp:1,083 0x1969e00e
      QCoreApplication::notifyInternal() at qcoreapplication.cpp:953 0x1969de60
      sendEvent() at qcoreapplication.h:231 0x196c379e
      QEventDispatcherUNIX::activateSocketNotifiers() at qeventdispatcher_unix.cpp:894 0x196c379e
      QEventDispatcherUNIXPrivate::doSelect() at qeventdispatcher_unix.cpp:291 0x196c4042
      QEventDispatcherUNIX::processEvents() at qeventdispatcher_unix.cpp:936 0x196c42f0
      QEventLoop::processEvents() at qeventloop.cpp:149 0x1969cace
      QEventLoop::exec() at qeventloop.cpp:204 0x1969cd28
      QCoreApplication::exec() at qcoreapplication.cpp:1,225 0x196a0eda
      main() at main.cpp:39 0x10659de4
  

  Now, you will see the entire track, with the exception of the entrance of main(), seems to be part of the loop of events or other system libraries. Anyone happen to know what is happening here or be willing to help?

  Thanks in advance!

  Well, I found a solution for the bug here. I was using sockets to communicate between my headless and requests for benefits and in my slot look for disconnect events in my application without a head, I got this code:

  void disconnected()
  {
      ...
      _socket->close();
      delete _socket;
      ...
  }
  

  I then changed this slot to look something like this, that solved my problem:

  void disconnected()
  {
      ...
      _socket->close();
      _socket->deleteLater();
      ...
  }
  

  My guess is that I tried to remove the plug while he was still waiting to be delivered to her events. Using deleteLater(), the event loop is responsible for the removal of the plug once all the events have been delivered, preventing the application from crashing.

• Issue with the exception of the loop

  Hello

  I had 4 database, I use dblinks to check some tables and write the results in a table. I have created a table to contain the instance names so that my loop check and perform my procedure.

  declare

  sql_string1 VARCHAR2 (4000);

  sql_string2 VARCHAR2 (100);

  Start

  sql_string2: = "truncate table Backup."

  immediately run sql_string2;

  for r in (select INSTANCE_NAME, del HOST_NAME)

  loop

  sql_string1: = ' insert into Backup

  SELECT "' | r.HOST_NAME | " '  '||', '''|| r.INSTANCE_NAME | " '  '||' ,

  INPUT_TYPE, STATUS, START_TIME, END_TIME V$RMAN_BACKUP_JOB_DETAILS@'|| r.INSTANCE_NAME;

  immediately run sql_string1;

  COMMIT;

  end loop;

  exception

  WHILE OTHERS THEN

  NULL;

  end;

  /

  If all listeners work or dbs work this procedure to work with no problems but if one of them is closed, simply insert the values until it gets error but I want that if she gets error will be another value. How can I do?

  I changed the values in the table led

  SYS@crofxd01:WSTORED: > select instance_name del;

  INSTANCE_NAM

  ------------

  BLABLA

  BLABLA

  BLABLA

  BLABLA

  FPT

  only the FPT is actual instance after I performed the procedure, I want to see that FPT values inserted DB.

  Thank you

  You must move the exceptions in the loop. Like this

  declare
  sql_string1 VARCHAR2 (4000);
  sql_string2 VARCHAR2 (100);
  Start
  sql_string2: = "truncate table Backup."
  immediately run sql_string2;
  for r in (select INSTANCE_NAME, del HOST_NAME)
  loop
  sql_string1: = ' insert into Backup
  SELECT "' | r.HOST_NAME | " '  '||', '''|| r.INSTANCE_NAME | " '  '||' ,
  INPUT_TYPE, STATUS, START_TIME, END_TIME
  OF V$RMAN_BACKUP_JOB_DETAILS@'|| r.INSTANCE_NAME;
  Start
  immediately run sql_string1;
  exception
  When then
  null;
  end;

  COMMIT;
  end loop;
  end;

  But make sure that you specify that the exception in the EXCEPTION block. Do not THEN use than OTHERS. Because it will catch all exceptions (long-awaited by you and should not not by you). It will hurt one day.

• Can I have Firefox ask before closing the window if I hit Ctrl-W by accident.

  When filling out forms in the browser I sometimes accidentally hit Ctrl-w to muscle memory. The ctrl-w is a function of writing in another program I use. When I hit Ctrl-w window close without warning and I can potentially use an hour of work.

  Is it possible to configure firefox, then it will appear a confirmation box when I click the Ctrl-w warning me that the browser window closes.

  It's a safety device great for touch typist who sometimes moves too fast.

  Thank you.

  I thing the warning appears only when you have 2 or more tabs open in the same window if the checkbox is checked in the Options (warn me when closing multiple tabs).

  With a single tab, I fear that it is not possible to be warned: in Firefox, CTRL + W closed the tab current, different from CTRL + SHIFT + W (or ALT + F4) to close the active window.

  If this shortcut is really a problem for you, you may replace it with an add-on like customizable shortcuts.

• Thunderbird is stuck in the loop. Can not stop in the Task Manager.

  links will not open in thunderbird. I followed the instructions in this link: http://www.ghacks.net/2013/01/20/fix-for-thunderbird-not-opening-links/.
  After you set the 3 True values, I left and restarted thunderbird.
  I then clicked on a link in an e-mail message and the LAUNCH APPLICATION box appeared.
  I accidentally entered "thunderbird" instead of "firefox".
  When I clicked on the link in the e-mail, it goes into a loop where the hourglass icon will flash constantly.
  I couldn't go back to the LAUNCH APPLICATION window to change.
  Then, I deleted the Thunderbird folder in program files and reinstalled thunderbird OK.
  Everything works fine until I click on a link in a message. He then goes into the loop, and I have to restart.
  Is there something in the registry that I can change to fix this?
  Thanks for any help you can offer.
  Kind regards
  Geoff Wight

  Go to the menu Tools (alt + T) > options > attachments and delete any reference to Thunderbird.

  Change the preferences to their default values. by https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Hyperlinks-in-Messages-Not-Working#w_check-for-an-incorrect-preference then you can read any article that the incorrect pref is usually only a question after using the Thunderbrowse add-on.

• If I click once on an e-mail in the message window while I closed the preview window, I opened that makes e-mail?

  If I click once on an e-mail in the message window while I closed the preview window, I opened that makes e-mail? I worry because I don't want to open a message that my bad-ware download on my computer. If the preview window is closed, I noticed that the number of e-mails read does not change when I click once on e-mail. Can I assume that unread means that it has not been opened.

  Read the answer! Your question is answered there.

  Read / unread is purely an indicator. It has no real meaning. If you go into the menu (alt + T) tools > options > advanced > reading and display, you can change when a mail is marked as read in immediately to 10 seconds (this is what outlook express used) up to 1000 seconds.

  The software marked the email read is that this logic can go. It's always "BOLD", the software did not mark the message read.

  You open the mail? It is an unquantifiable statement.

  In the context of Thunderbird an individual mail is not a discrete element that is stored. It is a part of your data for mail/News. So try to equate open to action just does not fit.

  Thunderbird received mail as a series of lines. He collected in an email that he stores in a file with all your other emails for this folder. You open the file in that the mail is stored? Totally irrelevant Thunderbird opens to get mail every time that mail is added to the folder or to view a mail in this folder.

  Each time a letter is displayed (any mail) the file all your emails for this folder are saved in the opening and reading.

  If clicking on the mail list 'open' the file. Probably not, it was probably already open. The file is opened, read, written to and updated probably half a dozen times since Thunderbird started so if you click on the mail to see won't change anything good at all. If the e-mail file has been closed it will be open to view the contents of the mail, but he is perhaps already open.

  The key is that you try to apply assumptions to mail that simply do not apply. That's why I sound as if I'm going in circles.

  You also may ask, when I fill the kerosene tank my electric light.

  • The software mark mail as read when you say
  • It opens files underlying storage constantly. Clicking on an entry may or may not cause the opening of the file.
  • Your mail is not in a file on its own, it is in a file that contains all the messages in the folder and the mail deleted until the folder is compacted.

• I accidentally closed the dialog box when Firefox was asked if it was OK for a program to change my computer. Now, I can't open the program.

  I have a game (Neverwinter Nights) that updates periodically. Yesterday, I got a dialog box asking if it was OK for game to change my computer (happens from time to time). I meant to click 'Yes', but instead accidentally closed the box (which I think will remain always to 'no'). Now, I can not open the game. How can I fix?

  Hello stmanley1970, these dialog boxes are not from Firefox, but your windows operating system 7. Therefore, please contact support for this game publisher channels to receive help for that matter...

• After playing games online, I closed the window and sees a piece of the game into my office window. It looks like a virus. What should I do?

  After playing games online, I closed the safari window but I can barely see the walkthrough of word written in my office. I changed my desktop to a solid color, so I can see it better. I also see the Netflix pause button and if I reduce the window as I type right now I see Select a community to Post To my office. Is this a virus? If yes what should I do to fix it?

  Thank you!

  Are you referring to the "ghost image" or "ghosting"?

  Avoiding persistence on Apple displays - Apple Support

• Web site will not disappear after closing the tab AND restart Firefox.

  I went to a website to watch a video, and when I had finished I closed the tab on what the site was. When I had finished on my computer, I closed Firefox. The reopening of Firefox later he restored the page. I don't know why it does this, and I can't make it disappear. I deleted all my cookies/cache, etc., as well as do a virus scan and nothing can tell me why this is happening. It's pretty boring, and I would that my browser to work properly. I've recently updated to the latest version of Firefox, so everything is up-to-date. I'll take any suggestions anyone can throw on me because I am fresh out of ideas.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello
  Thanks for letting us know about your problem. The problem can be solved very easily. Just reset your Firefox and your problem can be solved. To reset instructions, please see this article Firefox Refresh - reset the parameters and modules

  Please let us know if your problem cannot be fixed by above mathod.
  Concerning

• Close the last tab without closing the application firefox

  Greetings!

  1.i would like to close the last tab without closing the application. The behavior I expect is the application to open a new empty tab when I close the last tab currently I can't close the last tab which already has some open site in it.

  2. when I open a new tab, I have to enter a Web site address. I expect the app to just open a new empty tab and let him to enter an address or not for me.

  Thank you for your support. I love firefox for Android.

  It is being developed and will be changed to allow the closure of the last tab in Firefox 18 or 19.