Comparison of model in gold

Similar Questions

• Created the model in gold, need help about sysprep

  Dear team,

  I created a template in gold for windows 2012 R2 STD edition. All virtual machines will be deployed now from this model.

  Once the new virtual machine is deployed, then I'll run sysprep.exe

  then I got these screen I just want to confirm which option should I select here IE enter Out - of - Box Experience (OOBE) or enter the system check Mode, and I have to restart or shut down the virtual machine.

  

  Need your help on the same.

  concerning

  Mr. Vmware

  Yes, the generalize option removes unique information from a Windows installation so that you can safely reuse this image on a different virtual machine.

• comparison qeustion models: when the unit is not perpendicular to the object

  Hi all

  I m new in OR vision. I have already created a program for pattern matching and hoping to get the angle of rotation.

  My problem is: when the subject turns in any higher than 20 ° angle, I can't get an accurate angular measurement.

  I assumed it might be because my camera was not perpendicular to the surface of the object. anyone of you nice guys could give me some advice please.

  Thanks in advance

  Just use the arrow as a generic object.  Place a fiduciary are in it and find the relationship between the arrow and the alignment.  I edited your photos to place a hole in the top of the arrow.  The VI concludes the arrow like a bright star.  It uses the bounding box as the search box to find the hole.  The center of the arrow and the center of the hole form a line pointing in the same direction as the arrow.  The VI and sample images are attached.

  

• Compare the gold - change of scale model?

  Hello

  I have a prototype system of control works very well with the Template.vi or compare and find most of the defects in my DataSet.

  However, currently I have position and scale information coming from the pattern match in compare it gold screw model (as in the example of OR). This works well when the samples have the same size, but if there are any changes to the scale but the comparison of the model begins to fight. (I tried the border thickness settings to ignore it, but it could be even better)

  I would like to be able to use the pass information on the scale of the Pattern Match in the model compare gold, but when I just wire the value in front of the cluster of pattern match (as is done with the information of position and angle) the program and then not picking up not the other flaws he did before, even when the scale has not changed.

  Has anyone encountered this problem before?
  I have to somehow prepare the VI of model or compare to a size change?

  (final application is a system of inspection of logo, very similar to the example of NOR provided)

  Obtained this sort ultimately (via a call to support) so leave a note for all those who in the future which has this problem:

  The scheme normal game VI does not scale ouput information.

  You must use the GEOMETRIC pattern match to get the information across.

• Corresponding template or gold color

  Hi all

  I posted an earlier question on what advice can be given for equipment that could be used to acquire a fingerprint. I got a very helpful answer. Now I'm still working on this project of fingerprint recognition and reflected in the logic to use on the corresponding images. I came across the "pattern matching" and features "gold model' on NI Vision assistant and hoped someone could tell me on the good sense that I could get more information on how one of these features overview to their matches.

  Thank you

  OC

  Hi OC,

  It comes with NI Vision than the 400 + page manual Concepts of vision.  That explains in detail all the features available in NI Vision, including filtering and comparison of model Golden.

  This document can be found in \National Instruments\Vision\Documentation\Concepts_Manual.pdf

• Change your selling model now!

  We are a large number of customers who do not want to use pirated copies of CC of Adobe Photoshop, first Pro CC, hearing CC etc. But what choice you give us when you want us to subscribe and then never really learn how to own software? This is unacceptable.

  
  Good models and comparison of models of sale Adobe.

  
  BEST MODEL EVER...
  1 lifetime membership, pay one time, all clean! (But say I only use Photoshop, I pay and then I don't even all future versions and Photoshop, including all future updates).

  
  THE BAD MODEL
  2. pay for a program like Photoshop CC and get all the updates to come. So for the next version of Photoshop, you would have to purchase again.

  
  THE GOURMET MODEL
  3. buy a program like Photoshop, but you can buy the updates separately.

  
  THE TERRIBLE ILLOGICAL ADOBE MODEL
  4. subscribe to the creative cloud and never actually own all the programs. Oh yes and the programs will be off when you stop paying.

  You realize that you have never any software... not you?  You purchase a license to use other software, you do not have the software... they retain all rights over it and you agree to abide by the agreement, you agree.

  While I have no use for it, the cloud is actually an option very inexpensive compared to one of your other projects, especially when you try to imagine what would cost a lifetime membership!  For people who do not want every patch/update that happens, it can be expensive to maintain, but those are the breaks.  When you own something, and you let people use it, you have the right to dictate the rules and operating costs.

• marked VM as a model

  Hello!

  What to do now? I was finishing my model in gold, when I accidentally marked a virtual machine as a model.

  How to I "uncheck". It was a kind of critical server as well.

  Thanks in advance for any help and assistance.

  ShoAss

  Just go home ===> Vm and models ===> and right click on the virtual machine and convert it back into a virtual machine

• Increased support of Type of object in Data Modeler

  Hello
  
  It is a matter primarily for the development team to shape data as well as the Group of tools. First of all, the production of Data Modeler 3.0 version is very nice and improvements in data types on which was in EA1 are large. Thanks for adding to the support of the domain to the definition, attributes and parameters for methods which makes life much simpler and opens the door to a range more wide object type modelling and ease of implementations because consistency can now be maintained much easier through areas. Support for the smoothing of lines is also impressive. It is the best app that I've seen, even better than what we had in the Design Editor in the Oracle Designer, Bravo still once the team which built the diagrammer interfaces.
  
  My question is, going forward will be Data Modeler has continued to be improved to fully support the Oracle objects and object relational (OR) model? I ask this question because as users of Oracle RDBMS, we do not have a tool that allows to fully model and implement the functionality provided by the server group in the field of object-relational features. Oracle Designer had a capacity of modeling of GOLD, but the end of the product life has stopped any further development. One of the common excuses is there is no request for the market for object - relational modeling. I would say, that the absence of the market demand for object - relational applications is because we have never had a tool that fully supports the relational Oracle - model object. Nor do we have a development tool that allows us to implement a fully developed relational Oracle - model object. The Tools group stopped the development of Oracle Forms support for nested objects and collections. The LOV REF columns feature is quite impressive, but we are unable to get nested collections, still less a nested collection of REFs.
  
  So as a member of the end user community, we are stuck in this Catch 22. The server group continues to support and improve the object - model relationship, but the tools and modelling groups have not kept with the tools to model or to implement the features and the features supported by the database. As a result, we have a partially constructed set of tools that allows you to scratch the surface of the object - model relationship, but is not able to take full advantage of the powerful features of legacy, legacy and extensive collections, the ability to inherit and extend methods, etc...
  
  The object - relational model introduced with Oracle8, 10g solved the problem of evolution of type which has made the implementation of the production of realistic objects. My question is; Data Modeler is finally going to fully support the relational Oracle - model object? If until the end user community, we finally get a tool that totally supported the model of GOLD, finally, we will be able to model, generate and deploy applications that will in turn create this market demand which is lacking for the relational model object.
  
  Thanks in advance,
  ACE

  Hi Ace,

  Thanks for the good words.

  will be the Data Modeler has continued to be improved to fully support the Oracle objects and object relational (OR) model?

  Short time - Yes. What do you want Besides lack of support now nested columns (and related to these constraints, including the PK constraint) and the generation of the 'Alter Instructions?

  Philippe

• The thickness of particle detection and eradication of these particles with thickniss less than a given value

  In my project after comparison of model or get I the image with defects.

  

  I defects (particles) are relevant with a thickness greater than a given value.

  I have tried a few methods, particle analysis, read a few articles in this forum... But I can't find any real solution to my problem.

  I need suggestions how to on this subject.

  Thanks in advance.

  Devrim

  Is there a way to filter the particles from erosion.  If the particle is still after N erosions, it is preserved.  Otherwise, it is removed.  The function is IMAQ RemoveParticle.

  Bruce

• Problem: by dropping a Table Check constraint

  I got a check from a table constraint in my model. Then wanted to synchronize data dictionary. The comparison of models- dialogue see the difference, but as I check the box drop -(which is unchecked by default) and click the DOF preview preview is empty. I mean it's totally empty, not even the ddl-comments standard as

  -Generated by Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeler 4.0.1.836

  show up! So I guess that this behavior as a bug.

  Dieter

  Hi Dieter,

  Thanks for reporting this problem.  I connected a bug on this issue.

  Note that this problem does not occur for check constraints that are defined in the definition of a column.   It only occurs to verify the constraints defined at the Table level.

  David

• Process of creating parent?

  The way in which everyone leads their parents linked clone?  Create a base with customizations image / optimizations that are fair to all pools from your view, and then create a template out of it?  So, we can create the VMs to parent and customize more until you're ready to snapshot and deploy?  If you do this we need to sysprep or run a specification custom when you create the parents leave the basic model or just clone?

  What we are doing with you, a model and reclone out as a model in gold, of course with the right naming convention so that we do not confuse the other. ignore us the thing as process, quickprep/sysprep sysprep will change later during the linked clone see the SID.

• Slow logon to VMware View

  Hello

  I have a wooded area view view 3.1.2 Agent 3.1.2 ESX 3.5 update 5, latest vmware tools.

  the environment was working fine... but the last week we have updated ESX 3.5 update 4 update 5. So we must update the vmare tools. I did it and I have also updated the image of gold or model for my non-critere - automated pool.

  After that, I've recreated the pool now, I noticed and my people notice of delays to log... they enter their credentials and to Windows XP SP3 about 70 seconds to log on when my initial stock took just 15 seconds...

  no idea what could be causing this delay important for users of the logon domain and we ready to work their jobs

  In fact when I use my model or gold imageto log my model users works very well it dry takes15 for any user...?  :|   It's only the pool that has problems.

  any idea abourt this?

  Thanks a lt

  Sorry it took me so long to answer, we had changes in firewall and apparently VMware Forums was blocked... which is very useful.  :-|

  Check your physical boxes and check that they are in the same OU as the virtual machines.  Run a gpresult to verify that they have the exact same GPs.  Finally, see specifications of material between physical and virtual mailboxes.  Need more RAM/CPU, these play a role at boot time.  In a normal newspaper should be between 10-20 seconds, nothing more than that normally can be blamed on GP, login scripts, or AV.

  -Gunnar

• ORA-30951 saving TPoX patterns

  Hello
  
  I am trying to record patterns of reference storage TPoX XMLType object / relational.
  
  BEGIN
  () DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.registerSchema
  SCHEMAURL = > 'fixml-fields-base-4 http://www.fixprotocol.org/FIXML-4-4 - 4.xsd',.
  SCHEMADOC = > bfilename('XML_FILES_DIR','fixml-fields-base-4-4.xsd'),
  LOCAL = > TRUE,
  CSID = > nls_charset_id ('AL32UTF8'));
  END;
  /
  
  I get the following error:
  
  ORA-30951: Element or attribute to Xpath/schema/simpleType [131] / annotation/appinfo [2] [@] exceeds the maximum length
  
  The element, he means, is indeed big enough:
  
  < xs: appinfo xmlns: x = "http://www.fixprotocol.org/fixml/metadata.xsd" >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "EUSUPRA" desc = "EuroSupranationalCoupons" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "College" desc = "FederalAgencyCoupon" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "RICA" desc = "FederalAgencyDiscountNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "PEF" desc = "PrivateExportFunding" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "SUPRA" desc = "USDSupranationalCoupons" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "WAS" desc = "Future" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = 'OPT' desc = "Option" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "CORP" desc = "CorporateBond" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "RPC" desc = "CorporatePrivatePlacement" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "CB" desc = "ConvertibleBond" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "DUAL" desc = "DualCurrency" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "EUCORP" desc = "EuroCorporateBond" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "XLINKD" desc = "IndexedLinked" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "STRUCT" desc = "StructuredNotes" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "YANK" desc = "YankeeCorporateBond" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "FOR" desc = "ForeignExchangeContract" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "CS" desc = "CommonStock" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "PS" desc = "PreferredStock" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "BRADY" desc = "BradyBond" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "EUSOV" desc = "EuroSovereigns" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TBOND" desc = "USTreasuryBond" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "HUE" desc = "InterestStripFromAnyBondOrNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TIPS" desc = "TreasuryInflationProtectedSecurities" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TCAL" desc = "PrincipalStripOfACallableBondOrNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TPRN" desc = "PrincipalStripFromANoncallableBondOrNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "UST" desc = "USTreasuryNoteDeprecatedValueUseTNOTE" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "USTB" desc = "USTreasuryBillDeprecatedValueUseTBILL" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TNOTE" desc = "USTreasuryNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "GOOD" desc = "USTreasuryBill" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "REPO" desc = "Redeem" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "FORWARDS" desc = "Forward" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "BUYSELL" desc = "BuySellback" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "SECLOAN" desc = "SecuritiesLoan" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "SECPLEDGE" desc = "SecuritiesPledge" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TERM" desc = "TermLoan" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "RVLV" desc = "RevolverLoan" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "RVLVTRM" desc = "RevolverTermLoan" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = 'BRIDGE' desc = "BridgeLoan" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "LOFC" desc = "LetterOfCredit" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "SWING" desc = "SwingLineFacility" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "DINP" desc = "DebtorInPossession" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "DEFLTED" desc = "Default" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "WITHDRN" desc = "Off" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "REPLACD" desc = "Replaced" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "AFFINÉ" desc = "Affiné" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MODIFIED" desc = "AmendedRestated" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "RETIREMENT" desc = "Retirement" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "BA" desc = "BankersAcceptance" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "NL" desc = "Tickets" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "BOX" desc = "BillOfExchanges" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "CD" desc = "CertificateOfDeposit" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "CL" desc = "CallLoans" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "CP" desc = "CommercialPaper" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "DN" desc = "DepositNotes" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "EUCD" desc = "EuroCertificateOfDeposit" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "EUC POLICY" desc = "EuroCommercialPaper" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "NQL" desc = "LiquidityNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MTN" desc = "MediumTermNotes" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "ONITE" desc = "Night" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "PN" desc = "PromissoryNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "PZFJ" desc = "PlazosFijos" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "STN" desc = "ShortTermLoanNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TD" desc = "TimeDeposit" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "XCN" desc = "ExtendedCommNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "YCD" desc = "YankeeCertificateOfDeposit" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "ABS" desc = "AssetbackedSecurities" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "GOOD" desc = "CorpMortgagebackedSecurities" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "CMO" desc = "CollateralizedMortgageObligation" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "EIT" desc = "IOETTEMortgage" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MBS" desc = "MortgagebackedSecurities" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MIO" desc = "MortgageInterestOnly" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MPO" desc = "MortgagePrincipalOnly" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MP" desc = "MortgagePrivatePlacement" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MPT" desc = "MiscellaneousPassthrough" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "PFAND" desc = "Pfandbriefe" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TBA" desc = "ToBeAnnounced" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "A" desc = "OtherAnticipationNotesBANGANEtc" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "COFO" desc = "CertificateOfObligation" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "COFP" desc = "CertificateOfParticipation" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "GO" desc = "GeneralObligationBonds" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MT" desc = "MandatoryTender" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "RAN" desc = "RevenueAnticipationNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "REV" desc = "RevenueBonds" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "SPCLA" desc = "SpecialAssessment" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "SPCLO" desc = "SpecialObligation" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "SPCLT" desc = "SpecialTax" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TAN" desc = "TaxAnticipationNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TAXA" desc = "TaxAllocation" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "NCPEC" desc = "TaxExemptCommercialPaper" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "TRAN" desc = "TaxRevenueAnticipationNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "VRDN" desc = "VariableRateDemandNote" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "WAR" desc = "Mandate" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MF" desc = "MutualFund" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "MLEG" desc = "MultilegInstrument" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "NONE" desc = "NoSecurityType" / >
  < x value: EnumDoc = "AMANDA" desc = "WildcardEntry" / >
  < / xs: appinfo >
  
  Should what setting I change in order to save the scheme?
  
  Any help much appreciated!

  Bug?

  I have reproduced on 11.2.0.2 and 11.2.0.3 using patterns from here: http://www.fixprotocol.org/documents/352/fixml-schema-4-4-20040109rev1.zip
  (and same problem when you try to sign up for binary XML)

  SQL> select * from v$version;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
  CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
  TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
  
  SQL> BEGIN
    2   DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.registerSchema(
    3     schemaurl => 'fixml-datatypes-4-4.xsd'
    4   , schemadoc => bfilename('TEST_DIR','fixml-datatypes-4-4.xsd')
    5   , local => TRUE
    6   , csid => nls_charset_id('AL32UTF8')
    7   );
    8  END;
    9  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> BEGIN
    2   DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.registerSchema(
    3     schemaurl => 'fixml-fields-base-4-4.xsd'
    4   , schemadoc => bfilename('TEST_DIR','fixml-fields-base-4-4.xsd')
    5   , local => TRUE
    6   , csid => nls_charset_id('AL32UTF8')
    7   );
    8  END;
    9  /
  BEGIN
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-30951: Element or attribute at Xpath
  /schema/simpleType[131]/annotation/appinfo[2][@] exceeds maximum length
  ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA_INT", line 37
  ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA", line 65
  ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA", line 136
  ORA-06512: at line 2
  

  I do not think that the appinfo elements will be used in the model of GOLD in any case, you can remove 'on-the-fly' and save the scheme resulting:

  SQL> DECLARE
    2
    3   v_schema xmltype := xmltype(bfilename('TEST_DIR','fixml-fields-base-4-4.xsd'), nls_charset_id('AL32UTF8'));
    4
    5  BEGIN
    6
    7   select deletexml(
    8            v_schema
    9          , '/schema/simpleType/annotation/appinfo'
   10          , 'xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"'
   11          )
   12   into v_schema
   13   from dual
   14   ;
   15
   16   DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.registerSchema(
   17     schemaurl => 'fixml-fields-base-4-4.xsd'
   18   , schemadoc => v_schema
   19   , local => TRUE
   20   );
   21
   22  END;
   23  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  

• default comparison gold

  Hey!

  If the first VI is used for the automatic creation of the model of the gold and the ground. This VI creates the model of an input image, puts the top mask (by default, ignore, Edge) and recorded in a specific location.

  The other VI - one for inspection using vision assistant. To WILL I use the photo entry form a camera, make the filtering using the model created in previous VI (pattern), I put the mark on the best match and then use this c.s.. To reposition the template created in the previous VI (golden) to do the inspection of gold model.

  So this algorithm works fine most of the time, but sometimes there is a problem with inspection of gold model. Match is found, c.s. is created, but when I use the template created in the previous VI, the region where there is no mask (the value of 0 in the mask pixels) are shown/presented as a default. This happens quite often (one of ten inspections). Why this region doesn't appear as a default because there is no default there. I did an inspection on peace even several times and sometimes there is a fault and other times everything is ok.

  I am not allowed to view poster or VI, since it is a commercial project. I'm sorry, but please help me, ask questions etc. I have to solve this problem.

  Thank you!

  Matej

  Dear DavidVr,

  I noticed that if I shared a model in two works very well. So I think the problem was that I saved Pattern matching model and tamplate in the same file, althougt the image is the same. So now when I run the VI for the automatic creation of models he saves two temlates as two files distinct, and everything is OK. Thank you!

  Matej

• Exclude foreign keys from the relational model comparison

  Hello!

  Is it possible to exclude foreign keys for comparison when comparing relational models?

  It's the same and when inporting dictionary of data in the relational model.

  Thank you very much for the help!

  Kind regards

  Dimitar Angelov

  Hi Dimitar,

  Yes it is possible to do using "generate DDL' flag - there is an option in the dialog box"compare models"- tab" Options > compare Options '-C' is a checkbox "use generate DDL settings to filter objects.

  You must make a DDL generation with open physical model that will be used - in the DDL generation options you can deselect items you don't want to have in comparison. You can save as a configuration of generation of DDL or simply do it before the comparison.

  After comparing models of dialog, you can check "Use generate DDL settings to filter objects" box to check (and probably to load a configuration of generation of DDL) and use the buton "refresh trees."

  You can use this method to filter the tables, constraints PK and UK, index, constraints FK and the views.

  Philippe