Compatibility matrix for Cisco Catalyst 3012 Switch Module

Hello

I'm checking the compatibility of the VMware vSphere 5.5U1 Guide and an IBM switch module Part Number: 43W4401 product name: Cisco Catalyst Switch Module 3012. The search of the matrix returns Cisco 1GigE I350 LOM who seems to identify the drivers of Cisco.

Can anyone help clarify and check if this IBM re-branded chassis switch module is supported and to a specific firmware for the switch code? Thank you all.

L2/L3 switches are off-limit of drivers for vSphere hypervisor, so you don't find on the HCL...

Here's IBM BladeCenter matrix interop for VMware:

IBM ServerProven compatibility

and here is the interoperability of the switch Cisco Catalyst 3012 with IBM BladeCenter chassis:

IBM BladeCenter Interoperability Test program

I hope this helps...

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

  • PoE for Cisco Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-L

    Hello

    Will deploy this device for a small office. Just a quick question, a Cisco Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-l switch provides PoE on all its 8 ports or simply powered through his PoE uplink port.

    Read the URL below, but did not have much info. TIA!

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/produc...

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

    Sorry John, my comment is not directed at you.  The link you posted, the content is very, the lack of a better term, misleading.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps12200/prod_models_comparison.html

    Go to this site instead.  It shows that the model you have chosen has NO PoE.  Instead, it uses the PoE of a switch upstream to turn.

  • Cisco Catalyst 4503-> Cisco 3560 L3-> Cisco 2960 L2-> Cisco SMB switch

    Hi Experts,

    I am trying to add a Cisco SMB SF300 - 24 Switch to an infrastructure that has only the Cisco Catalyst switches

    The base layer is Cisco Cataylst 4503. Distribution is Cisco Catalyst 3560 and Cisco 2960 switches access layer.

    There are about 30 VLAN present in the infrastructure that is announced to all switches using VTP. Inter VLAN routing takes place at basic switches

    by creating the Interface VLAN for each VLAN of L2.

    1. the new 150 VLAN must be created on the new Cisco SMB switch. If I create a corresponding interface 150 VLAN on core switches, it will forward the other VLANs traffic just as he is currently working for Cisco 2960 Catayst switches?

    2. While they inspected, I could see that the DERIVATIVE is not supported on the Cisco SMB switches and I would need to go GVRP if I need to make advertising information to other switches VLAN. But since GVRP is only supported on CatOS and there is no inter operability between GVRP and DERIVED, I would need to manually create the VLAN on the new switch. Is this correct?

    Help, please!

    Thank you very much

    ANUP

    Good afternoon Anup Sasikumar

    Please use our forum

    My name is Johnnatan I am part of the community of support to small businesses, I saw your post and I understand that you want to configure VTP and GVRP.

    I'm afraid you will have to configure it manually each Vlan in each device CatOS GVRP, in order to keep their databases vlan in sync. As you say, VTP is support it not in CatOS

    You can try to connect the two protocols, but I encourage you do not follow this procedure.

    On your question about intervlan routing, if you create a corresponding interface 150 VLANS on switches to base it is routed, if your configuration is correct (port access, ports of junction, intervlan etc..)

    I hope that you will find this answer useful, if it was satisfactory to you, please indicate the question as answer.

    Please evaluate the useful messages.

    Greetings,

    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.

    Support of Cisco network engineer

  • Power switch module

    The power switch of my old HP Pavilion a320n PC motherboard has failed.  Someone at - it a source for a new power switch module?

    Thank you... Stony

    Hello

    The SPST momentary switch would have been my first choice.

    If I keep the power switch on my depressed e9280t he powered stops after three seconds.

  • Cisco Catalyst 2960-S switch configured for 802. 1 x sends a query to access the Radius Server Radius

    Setup

    Cisco Catalyst 2960-S running 15.0.2 - SE8

    Under Centos freeRadius 6.4 RADIUS server

    Client (supplicant) running Windows 7

    When Windows client is connected to the port (port 12 in my setup) with authentication of 802. 1 x active switch, show of Wireshark that catalyst sends ask EAP and the client responds with EAP response. But it made not the request to the Radius server. The RADIUS test utility 'aaa RADIUS testuser password new-code test group' works.
    Here is my config running. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    #show running mySwitch-
    mySwitch #show running-config
    Building configuration...

    Current configuration: 2094 bytes
    !
    version 12.2
    no service button
    horodateurs service debug datetime msec
    Log service timestamps datetime msec
    no password encryption service
    !
    hostname myswitch
    !
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    !
    activate the password secret 5 $1$ Z1z6$ kqvVYRQdVRZ0h8aDTV5DR0 enable password!
    !
    !
    AAA new-model
    !
    !
    AAA dot1x group group radius aaa accounting dot1x default start-stop radius authentication group!
    !
    !
    AAA - the id of the joint session
    1 supply ws-c2960s-24ts-l switch
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    control-dot1x system-auth
    pvst spanning-tree mode
    spanning tree extend id-system
    !
    !
    !
    !
    internal allocation policy of VLAN no ascendant interface FastEthernet0 no stop ip address!
    GigabitEthernet1/0/1 interface
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/3
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/5
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/6
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/7
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/8
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/9
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/10
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/11
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/12
    switchport mode access
    Auto control of the port of authentication
    dot1x EAP authenticator
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/13
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/14
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/15
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/16
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/17
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/18
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/21
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/22
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/23
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/26
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/27
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/28
    !
    interface Vlan1
    IP 10.1.2.12 255.255.255.0
    !
    IP http server
    IP http secure server
    activate the IP sla response alerts
    recording of debug trap
    10.1.2.1 host connection tcp port 514 RADIUS-server host 10.1.2.1 transport auth-port 1812 acct-port 1646 timeout 3 retransmit testing123 key 3.
    Line con 0
    line vty 0 4
    password password
    line vty 5 15
    password password
    !
    end

    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/16
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/17
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/18
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20

    Have you run wireshark on the server because the request to switch? If so you make sure that there is a response from the server? For Windows network POLICY Server (I've never tried Centos), you must ensure that the request is related to a policy which then authenticates, or denies access. Usually, it is a matter of such attributes and the seller.

    Regarding the configuration, it seems a bit out of the AAA. Try to remove the:

    line "aaa dot1x group service radius authentication" and this by using instead:

    "aaa dot1x default radius authentication group". After the dot1x word you are supposed to provide a list of the authentication or the default Word if you do not want to use a list.

  • Replacement Module supervisor in Cisco Catalyst 6500 VSS 1440

    Hello forum Cisco team!

    I am trying to replace a defective supervisor (Sup720 VS 10 G) on a pair of Catalyst 6509 VSS. I received the RMA and the document Replace Module, supervisor of the Cisco Catalyst 6500 Virtual Switching System 1440 (the document is attached) with the procedure. After going through the steps, I have a few questions during the installation of the new supervisor:

    1. do all links (including the VSL) must be connected before feeding the new supervisor? It comes from before that image and the boot config is copied to the new supervisor.

    2. once the startup config and the image is copied from the active VSS switch in the new supervisor, the document said to check orders for priority switch in the copied startup config form the active VSS, but the priority of each switch is not stored in the startup configuration as far as I know. Can you please clarify this?

    My goal is to add the new supervisor engine without disrupting the current active VSS switch.

    Thank you in advanced for your support!

    Hey,.

    With regard to your questions:

    1. do all links (including the VSL) must be connected before feeding the new supervisor? It comes from before that image and the boot config is copied to the new supervisor. - Yes

    2. once the startup config and the image is copied from the active VSS switch in the new supervisor, the document said to check orders for priority switch in the copied startup config form the active VSS, but the priority of each switch is not stored in the startup configuration as far as I know. Can you please clarify this? - Once you convert the switch for VSS priorities will be stored in the startup configuration file. Please visit the following link:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst6500/IOS/12-2Sx/configuration/guide/book/VSS.html#wp1111770

    However, it is no longer recommended and therefore should be avoided. I suggest you not setting is not the priority.

    HTH.

    Kind regards

    RS.

  • Cisco Nexus 1000V Virtual Switch Module investment series in the Cisco Unified Computing System

    Hi all
    I read an article by Cisco entitled "Best practices in Deploying Cisco Nexus 1000V Switches Cisco UCS B and C Series series Cisco UCS Manager servers" http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9902/white_paper_c11-558242.html

    A lot of excellent information, but the section that intrigues me, has to do with the implementation of module of the VSM in the UCS. The article lists 4 options in order of preference, but does not provide details or the reasons underlying the recommendations. The options are the following:

    ============================================================================================================================================================
    Option 1: VSM external to the Cisco Unified Computing System on the Cisco Nexus 1010

    In this scenario, the virtual environment management operations is accomplished in a method identical to existing environments not virtualized. With multiple instances on the Nexus 1010 VSM, multiple vCenter data centers can be supported.
    ============================================================================================================================================================

    Option 2: VSM outside the Cisco Unified Computing System on the Cisco Nexus 1000V series MEC

    This model allows to centralize the management of virtual infrastructure, and proved to be very stable...
    ============================================================================================================================================================

    Option 3: VSM Outside the Cisco Unified Computing System on the VMware vSwitch

    This model allows to isolate managed devices, and it migrates to the model of the device of the unit of Services virtual Cisco Nexus 1010. A possible concern here is the management and the operational model of the network between the MSM and VEM devices links.
    ============================================================================================================================================================

    Option 4: VSM Inside the Cisco Unified Computing System on the VMware vSwitch

    This model was also stable in test deployments. A possible concern here is the management and the operational model of the network links between the MSM and VEM devices and switching infrastructure have doubles in your Cisco Unified Computing System.
    ============================================================================================================================================================

    As a beginner for both 100V Nexus and UCS, I hope someone can help me understand the configuration of these options and equally important to provide a more detailed explanation of each of the options and the resoning behind preferences (pro advantages and disadvantages).

    Thank you
    Pradeep

    No, they are different products. vASA will be a virtual version of our ASA device.

    ASA is a complete recommended firewall.

  • 1400 series 802. 11 a bridge with Catalyst 3524 switch?

    According to the documentation below, "you cannot provide redundant power to 1100 and 1200 access points with the two power DC to its port and inline power from a patch panel or powered switch to the access point Ethernet port'. How about the 1400 series bridges? You can use a power injector to power and also connect it to a catalyst 3524 switch (WS-C3524-PWR-XL-EN)? He will know not to draw power from the switch? Or should it be plugged into a hub, and the hub plugged into the switch? Or what would be the recommended configuration? 3524 switch already has 350 access points and a trendy 350 bridge. What would be the risks, if any, plug the bridge 1400 series also in the switch so that it is also a power injector-shoot?

    Thanks for the tips!

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/wireless/ps458/prod_release_note09186a00801d0607.html

    Use the power only one Option

    "You cannot provide redundant power to 1100 and 1200 access points with the two power DC to its port and inline power from a patch panel or powered switch to the Ethernet port on the access point. If you are using power to the access point from the two sources, the switch connection control panel or power could close the port to which the access point is connected. Figure 1 illustrates the configuration of power, which can stop the port on the Panel of brewing or powered switch.

    "Figure 1 bad power Configuration with the help of two Power Sources

    "Operating Radio 5 GHz requires power injector, power Module or Catalyst 3550-24 PWR Switch

    "The series 1200 power injector and power module support operation 1200 series of the 5 GHz in the access point radio." Currently, the Catalyst 3550-24 PWR switch supports power for radio 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz radio. other switches and power patch panels could provide not enough power for the 5 GHz radio.

    "Access point requires 1200 Series universal power supply and power injector.

    "The 350 series universal power supply and power injector are not compatible with the 1200 Series access point. If you use a power injector or a power module to power a series 1200 access point, you must use a universal power supply series 1200. If you need to use an injector to power to inject into the access point Ethernet port, you must use a power injector 1200 series. »

    The power injector is between the switch and access point online. If your power injector fails, you have lost connectivity to the switch anyway. And to power from a device to a switchport works only if they are directly linked together; You can't have any other intermediate devices in the path.

    In short: No. is not a matter of being a bad idea, it is not be possible to try again.

  • PC8132F to Cisco Catalyst 3600

    Nice day

    I hope someone can help me here, I'll have questions, get a channel on port with 802. 1 q, working between a stack of 2 devices of the switches 8132F and a single Cisco Catalyst 3600, this switch series switch cannot be removed due to regulations graduates by a Government Department that works to and I need to put an effective link between the switch and our new 8132F switches (this was easy until the network was fully Cisco) but for the life of me I can't not operate. When I connect the ports (well I connect only 1 because I'm testing only at this stage, in the end, it will be two)

    Here's the configs for two switches

    Cisco:

    Interface Port-Channel 4

    Description box EtherChannel to Dell Core

    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4

    switchport mode trunk

    broadcast storm control 60.00

    interface GigabitEthernet1/3

    Description box to Dell Core EtherChannel * PORT 01 *.

    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4

    switchport mode trunk

    broadcast storm control 60.00

    spanning tree portfast trunk

    spanning tree guard root

    channel-group mode 4 on

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet1/4

    Description box to Dell Core EtherChannel * 02 PORT *.

    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4

    switchport mode trunk

    broadcast storm control 60.00

    spanning tree portfast trunk

    spanning tree guard root

    channel-group mode 4 on

    !

    Dell:

    interface port-channel 24
    Description "2 Port EtherChannel link Cisco 3600"
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4
    dvlan-tunnel mode
    port-channel min-links 1
    output
    !
    interface Te1/0/24
    Description "2 Port EtherChannel link Cisco 3600"
    active in mode channel-group 24
    Storm-control broadcasts 60
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4
    dvlan-tunnel mode
    output
    !
    interface Te2/0/24
    Description "2 Port EtherChannel link Cisco 3600"
    active in mode channel-group 24
    Storm-control broadcasts 60
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4
    dvlan-tunnel mode
    output

    Any help would be appreciated more

    Concerning

    Justin

    jpsimmonds, I sent an email and look forward to your response.

  • 6248 FI Cisco's UCS with Cisco catalyst 2960 connectivity

    In our environment, UCS, connects the two fabric as a Cisco Nexus 9 k switch upstream with vPC and it works well. But we need to isolate some virtual servers on the blades of the UCS on an entirely separate DMZ switch which is Cisco catalyst 2960.

    (1) so can we connect cables separate physical twinax of FI uplink ports to catalyst 2960 and connectivity to the servers in the DMZ keeping YEW to nexus connectivity as it is?

    (2) in this case, as there are 2 switches to nexus core 1 and 2 so we will require 2 cisco catalyst 2960 for disjoint such a network? or otherwise we can connect A FI and FI B to one on his 2 numbers 2960 switch. Gig SFP ports + 10?

    (3) also suggest things must be taken in charge, the best guides practice or an illustration in this context.

    The assignment is static and cannot be changed.

    location 1 - uplink 1

    slot 2 - uplink 2...

    If a property has no blade, the corresponding uplink is not used and that can not be changed!

    This dedication of uplinks of IOM is of course a lot of resources: cables, ports on FI, allowed port,...

  • Connection Cisco UCS 6120 FI directly to Cisco Catalyst 6500?

    I watch a lot of design with the Cisco UCS solution guide and everywhere it is Cisco Nexus 5000/7000 connects to the uplink ports of Cisco UCS 6120 FI with the benefits of technology to the vPC.

    How about connect Cisco UCS 6120 FI directly to 10GE ports in Cisco Catalyst 6500 (without VSS and VSS)? It is possible to design?

    If I use C6500VSS there will be port-channel of the aggregation of the UCS Nx10GE all the bandwidth?

    And what happens if I use C6500 (without VSS) - how it will be on the many links between UCS and two boxes C6500? It will be blocked by STP? A little on the other?

    Please explain to me, because we have only C6500 switches in our data center and want to test a Cisco UCS schassis.

    Yes, you can connect the 6120 s to cat6500s with or without vs. With VSS, you get a vPC as port channel where 2 links to a single 6120 can be connected to different 2 6500 s in a port LACP-channel.

    VSS is not necessary, you can connect a 10 G uplinks / 1 G of 1 or more of a 6120 at cat6500s. I you have 2 cat6500s (non - vss) and 2 uplinks by 6120, then you want to connect 1 cat6500-1 and the other to cat6500-2. I would recommend going ahead and creating a single port-channel port so that you can easily add the uplinks in the furture without interruption of service.

    Ideally, for non - vss, I would have 4 10 uplinks by 6120; 2 in a channel port cat6500-1 and 2 in a port in cat6500-2 channel

  • There is a maximum amount of hosts for Cisco SF300?

    Hello world

    I m using a Cisco (SRW224G4P) SF300 in my network and I m using Vlan´s.

    I m a lot of loss of packet´s in the network and the users are facing in the absence of performance.

    There are altogether seven switch´s in the network, 6 SF200 Cisco as 'access' switch´s and 1 Cisco SF300 as the 'core' switch.

    It has almost 170 devices connected to the network, mainly IP cameras, other devices are the DVR´s and the NVR´s, a server a certain stand-alone.

    Thing is I m, including the loss of packet´s, and I found this alarm in the SF300:

    2147480831 2012-Jul-06 13:14:45 % of IPFFT-W-SFFTREDYELLOW warning: IP SFFT Table Overflow, aggregated (1)

    2147480831 2012-Jul-06 13:14:45 % IPFFT-W-SFFTREDYELLOW WARNING: IP SFFT Table Overflow

    Some people say this switch (SF300) support´s only 100 guests and that s why I m get this alarm and lose packets.

    But I can't find the limit of host´s in the specification of the switch in any document from Cisco.

    Think you on this?

    There is a limit of 100 guests for this switch?

    Thanks in advance!

    Carlos

    Hi Calavalle, the module layer 3 can only the hardware switch 100 until it starts to change software. The switch can support up to 510 IP addresses but anything over 100 have wait performance degradation.

    -Tom
    Please evaluate the useful messages

  • VSphere VM - FEX compatibility matrix

    Hello

    I intend to upgrade an instance vCentre to 5.5, before that I need to know what versions of VM - FEX / VIBs will work with him. I have searched for a while and can not find a compatibility matrix, does anyone know where I could find it?

    Thank you.

    have you checked http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/interoperability/matrix/r_hcl_B_rel2.21.pdf

  • Cisco Catalyst 3750 G cable StackWise Query

    Hi everyone, I hope you can shed some light on my question.

    I have a job reserved Friday to add a switch to an existing fireplace. I was wondering at what point I need to use a longer cable to complete the ring.

    The existing stack consists of 2 x Cisco Catalyst 3750 G-24TS-24 switches are the 1.5U models and I will be adding a 3750 G-12-12 to the stack. So a total of 4U.

    So I guess my question is, do you think that the CAB-STACK - 50CM = cable supplied with the unit will be long enough, or do you think I will need to order a CAB-STACK - 1 M =? It's been a while since I've done it and I think remember me being quite stiff and bulky cables. All switches are in order without a space.

    Kind regards

    Mike

    Disclaimer

    The author of this announcement offers the information in this publication without compensation and with the understanding of the reader that there is no implicit or explicit adequacy or adaptation to any purpose. Information provided is for information purposes only and should not be interpreted as making the professional advice of any kind. Use information from this announcement is only at risk of the reader.

    RESPONSIBILITY

    Any author will be responsible for any damage that it (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profits) arising out of the use or inability to use the information in the view even if author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

    Poster

    If you do the 'classic' connections, i.e. 1 to 2, 2 to 3, 3, 4, and 4 to 1, and the 50CM won't reach between 1 and 4, you should be able to use shorter cables as: 1-2 and 1-3 and 4-2 and 4-3.

    PS:

    BTW, remember that 12-12 can use SDM models incompatible with the 3750 G.  I.e., ensure the 12-12 has a model SDM compatible before connect you to the battery.

  • Cisco first 2.1 / 2.2 support for Cisco ise 1.3?

    Hi, I just tried to connect cisco IP 2.1 to cisco ISE 1.3, but fails.
    I read the Release Notes, only 1.2 ISE ist supported.
    But I was wondering that the ssl negotiation fails (I made a packet capture).
    So PI 2.1 has not tried to connect to the ise 1.3 via api, because of the connection fails during the ssl handshake.

    Anyway, does anyone know if ISE 1.3 will be supported with a PI or PI 2.2 version 2.1.x?

    ICC 2.1.2 supports up to 1.2 ISE.  ICC 2.2 release date is scheduled for December 2014.  Read below.

    Table 4 The Infrastructure first, Cisco and Cisco wireless version compatibility matrix

Maybe you are looking for