Compatibility of Freelancer

Similar Questions

• Running a server of Freelancer with Windows XP and have problems with updates

  I run a server for a game called freelancer who has been released by Microsoft in 2003. My problem is that, in recent years, when I tried to get the server working after doing a clean install of WinXP Pro and get the updates, the server hanging and not start working properly. After several installations with various combinations of what has been installed after the OS, I finally got the server works, but get this: the server runs only on Windows XP with NO updates. WHY?

  I have a theory that I can't prove it on WinXP... When Freelancer was released in 2003, XP was new and she has no security features there now, and I think that one or more of the mess of updates with the server of DirectPlay 8 which is integral to the operation of the server. Of you Eggheads Microsoft must know what I mean... I don't know enough on XP to do more to make a guess, and it's my guess...

  Thank you for allowing me to escape,
  Tanamir

  Hello

  DirectPlay has been moved to support engineering and is an obsolete API. This was done mainly because of security problems and the fact that most of the features of DirectPlay is no longer relevant. TCP/IP is the ubiquitous network protocol and support for the head-to-head modem, serial port,

  NetBIOS, IPX and other suppliers is no longer relevant. Native API for TCP/IP in Windows is WinSock, and the usefulness of the library is so limited.

  There are technologies in Windows XP SP 2 or later version that provide server under protocols of discovery to manage the features of lobbying (P2P and PNRP), and many third-party solutions exist for matching. Future Microsoft technologies for this will be based on WinSock and not of DirectPlay.

  Support in future versions of the operating system will be determined primarily by the problem of application compatibility and will continue to be available through the Platform SDK for those supporting legacy streaming of DirectPlay applications.

  For reference: error messages when you try to connect to the game multiplayer matchmaking: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/829151/en-us

• Backward compatibility in CS5 inDesign a MAJOR issue

  I'm a print designer who works in InDesign. I bought CS3 Design Premium in summer 2008. Shortly after CS4 came out, but after only having forked on a big piece of change, I decided against upgrading to CS4 right away. Recently, I considered the upgrade but then heard that CS5 came out so I decided to postpone the upgrade and wait for the new software. I just checked the trial version of InDesign CS5 and after talking with Support Adobe came to the conclusion that I can not upgrade to CS5. Why? Compatibility BACK to CS3. Export functions previously available which provided a way for worms backward compatibility via an .inx file disappeared.

  I design freelance for a large number of different clients, and once the design is complete, I need to provide my customers the InDesign file and all associated policies ad images. Most of my clients are still on CS3. If I upgrade to CS5 I instantly not will be able to work for 2/3 of my clients, I would have no way to save a file back to CS3. Adobe support told me that I would need to buy CS4 and CS5, as I could save my CS5 file to the IDML format and open it in CS4 and then I could save the CS4 file as an INX file and open that is CS3. THEY ARE CRAZY? It must first be version 3 and InDesign running on my computer all the time and secondly, why should I buy CS4 when I pay extra to upgrade to CS5 because I didn't upgrade from CS4 versions? It's so messed up that it must be an oversight - please tell me there is a current patch!

  PS - I have never posted on a forum before, so if I have broken the rules of etiquette of forum or somehow offended, I apologize now and if I (and Adobe Support staff I talked to) have forgotten something, please enlighten me!

  Just semantic, Cynthia.

  Retail, commercial. Same thing.

  Updates are exactly the same as their counterparts full commercial/retail except for the price.

  Adobe also student and academic awards.

  The link that I you provided with is for CS3 Mac updated CS4 Design Premium and assumes that you have one of the CS3 suites.

  Bob

• software compatibility

  Before I dive and upgrade to Sierra, I'm looking for a reliable source check the compatibility of the applications, I currently rely on.  Many are a bit dated.  Any suggestions?

  Main applications:

  Microsoft Office for Mac 2011 v 14.6.8

  Quicken for Mac 2007 v 16.2.4

  Photoshop CS5 x 64 new v12.0

  Roxio Toast 10 Titanium v 10.0

  Apple Pages, Numbers and Keynote ' 09

  Running OS X Lion mountain.

  Click here.

  (145086)

• I have to stay with OS10.7.5 due to software compatibility, but is it possible to update Safari to latest version during your stay on OS10.7.5

  I have to stay with OS10.7.5 due to software compatibility, but is it possible to update Safari to latest version during your stay on OS10.7.5. How this is done. Thank you very much.

  It is not possible to update Safari past 6.1.6 on Lion.

  (144969)

• How to: Crush 3/iMac 5 k (compatibility mode)

  Hello friends,

  I see quite a few new features on the market with Thunderbolt 3. According to the FAQ of TB3 Intel, TB1 and TB2 was designed with future upgrades in mind. This means that you can connect, once a solution is available, on a host of TB2 TB3 system using compatibility mode. It will only work to 20Gbps TB2, but work remains. The same is true of peripheral TB2 TB3 host computer (will work but at slower speed)

  This would be similar to the connection of a USB 3 device on a USB 2 or 1 USB host but only get speeds over slow or vice versa.

  
  

  The question I have is that if someone came out with these fittings/adapters? What I've seen online seems to go using a device of TB2 and TB3 host and each of these adapters is Windows only. I have spent too many hours searching so I'm curious to know if someone has yet to fall on an adapter or converter that connect DisplayPort TB2 host and have the device USB-C/TB3 (USB - C not only) in compatibility mode.

  The reason? Peripheral TB3 are already less expensive than TB2 devices. I don't know who will get the most expensive. I don't care 40Gbps if he gives me a simple way to add multiple devices USB 3.0, exhibitions and maybe the eSata device. I know there are hubs, but I would prefer something that is the test of the future TB3 would be cheaper and future proof for NeXTGen computers.

  (Sorry for the TL; DR but it is always a person who does not read or "assume" it is a noob question and gives an answer "Captain Obvious". Don't BE this guy here...)
  

  Sincere greetings,

  Jorge Uptown

  JLopez. Chicago wrote:

  The question I have is that if someone came out with these fittings/adapters?

  bolt-adapter https://www.StarTech.com/cables/Thunderbolt-3-cables/Thunderbolt-3-USB-c-Thunder ~ TBT3TBTADAP

  

• DIGITAL CAMERA RAW COMPATIBILITY UPDATE 6.21

  ***? How many times I have to do? I'm FED UP! I don't care ABOUT RAW! Update your program... I have

  NEVER USE!  NOT my computer!

  You're not talking Apple here.  It is a moderated forum for Apple to discuss features and troubleshooting. Apple-> system-> software update Preferences menu contains options to disable automatic downloads, although the Mac App Store update itself for Snow Leopard activates the automatic notifications of updates.  While a nuisance, you have just to tell more later, only choose to update once you have read the documentation to verify that its good operation with what you have.  Always back up your data before allowing updates.

  For direct feedback to Apple, who may have only one impact of future operating systems, http://www.apple.com/feedback

  If you find that a specific update has compatibility issues, we invite you to sign up for a free developer online account on http://developer.apple.com and submit a bug report to http://bugreporter.apple.com where you can know at least that if it's something reported before.  But this will not use or disclose this information here because of a confidentiality agreement.

• ANT or heart Bluetooth Monitor strap compatibility?

  That is, compatibility with A separate more specific ANT/Bluetooth Heart Monitor strap?

  Hello

  If preferred to use the integrated heart rate monitor, Apple Watch can measure your heart rate via an external pair Bluetooth chest strap cardiofrequence-meter.

  More information:

  Your heart rate. What it means, and where on Apple Watch you will find. -Apple Support

  Use the Bluetooth with your Apple Watch - Apple Support Accessories

• Corrupt Digital Raw compatibility update

  I have my macbook set to do automatic updates. I see a light red on the App Store, which shows an updated - and when I check it said provision, "Digital Raw Compatibility Update, version 6.20. I scroll down and see that it has installed this update even at least 10 times start on 13 August through 24 August! Even updated, same version and I think it's a corrupted file or virus! Help, I want to stop saying that I need to update!

  Hello cdaniels31.

  Thank you for using communities Support from Apple. I understand that the Digital Raw compatibility update, version 6.20 performed several times, but the App Store there is always a full update. I am pleased to provide you with advice for this problem.

  First of all, let me put your mind at ease. It is an updated official Apple for the compatibility of the RAW for OS X El Capitan image, not a virus. It seems that OS X is not recognizing that it was already done.

  Let's start troubleshooting by restarting your MacBook. Then we will try to complete the update by using the link below, instead of using the App Store.

  Digital Raw Compatibility Update, version 6.20

  Finally, restart your MacBook, once more.

  Kind regards.

• Compatibility «?» (Mac Pro Tower / Firewire / climax together, etc..)

  I take Logic Pro 9, but after looking at all the improvements for Logic Pro X, I can't wait to get up to speed.

  I like the look of the improvements to the plug-in; logic adding distance (not available for LP9?); Drum Kit Designer, synthesizer, etc.

  When he (LP10) announced that there is a flagrant limitation I had with my current set-up but I don't remember what the hiccup was... perhaps there is none and I could be good-to-go.  Can anyone confirm if and where I'm looking at compatibility problems?

  System: Mac Pro Tower (mid-2010) 2.8 GHz Quad Core Intel Xenon

  OS: 10.10.5 (Yosemite)

  Interface: Climax together - Firewire

  If I remember, the question I met was first introduced with the announcement of Logic Pro X was he needed El Capitan - which did not offer the divers "Core Audio" / support, which means that overall height (Firewire) would be uncertain if even not work at all.  "" Looking at the "tech specs" on Logic Pro X, it supports OS X 10.10.  That looks promising (if it in fact the issue with El Capitan and the lack of support for Core Audio driver still exists).

  Can I run Logic Pro X to Yosemite?

  Can I run overall height (FireWire) in El Capitan without the Core Audio Driver issues / Firewire?

  Thanks in advance!

  I must add, additional hardware, I am running is a UAD PCI card in the tower.

• compatibility update

  Hi I'm still stuck with Firefox and their nasa night launch addon - belt LavaFox & BlackFox Orions w / Grim Reaper (one who is all black, no shit bar gray and the drop-down boxes are black with white writing), it's the best setup I like for my computer and I've just updated to the new firefox and it is incompatible? I tried to download the other launch night nasa and that ' s when I got pissy gray bar and white drop-down boxes (shit) so I had to remove firefox and download a previous version of 2014 to correct the problem and disable all future updates.
  How you do this? you boast of personalization and are never compatible previous addons, that I don't want any other addons that this ive got! I think it's the best it is its completely black all the boxes included and somehow you will find it is too hard to make sure that all the addons have a single line of code that is also added to your updates, so they all work together and now I can't update and continue my experience with firefox now I am looking for the alternative browser options that give me what I like and allow me to keep it because it is always, unless I'm finding that you took my situation seriously and we will integrate the compatibility section of addon for all the new updates.

  Yours Sincerely
  Disgruntled users

  You were able to use this theme through 41 of Firefox, but it stopped working in Firefox 42?

  I think others have mentioned problems with the complete themes in Firefox 42, but I don't remember the details. I hope an update will come.

  In the meantime, rather than running a version with known security vulnerabilities, you might consider another variant of Firefox called the Extended Support Release (ESR). It is currently based on Firefox 38 with a few security updates. It is unlikely to have any change relating to the compatibility of the Add on, until next year.

  If you decide to try it, here's how I suggest to install:

  Clean reinstall it

  We use this name, but it isn't about deleting your settings, this is to ensure that the program, files are clean (not incompatible, corrupt or exotic code files). As described below, this process does not disrupt your existing settings. Don't uninstall NOT Firefox, that does not need.

  (A) download a fresh Installer for Firefox 38.4.0esr of https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/all/ in an ideal location. (Scroll down your preferred language).

  (B) the release of Firefox (if any).

  (C) to rename the program folder, either:

  (Windows 64-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files (x86)\FxOld
  

  (Windows 32-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files\FxOld
  

  (D) run the installer downloaded to (A). It should automatically connect to your existing settings.

  Success?

  Note: Some plugins can only exist in this FxOld file. If it is missing something essential, present in these files:

  • \FxOld\Plugins
  • \FxOld\browser\plugins

• Why can't Norton Identity Safe compatibility be integrated into the latest versions of Firefox? IE seems not to have problems with it.

  Firefox constantly asks me to upgrade to the latest version, which is not a problem as long as the new generation is compatible with applications that I serve throughout and rely on every day. I use the 40.0.3 version and it wants me to update to 41.0.2. If the Norton Identity Safe toolbar work with my current version of Firefox, what is the compatibility issue with a newer version of Firefox? IE does not appear to have this problem of update... which makes me consider the switch back to IE as my default browser. I rely on the Identity Safe to take care of my connection problems, and there is no need to deal with problems of incompatibility. I know I'm not alone in finding this aggravation with updates. (I use Win7 Home Premium, 64-bit).

  Sorry, this is a change in the types of code Add - ons are allowed to include. It was supposed to change in Firefox 40, but at the request of vendors such as Symantec, it was postponed to 41 of Firefox. I don't think this change will flip over. Norton is working on a new version, but I understand that it takes longer than expected.

  Here's what I suggest for users who need Norton password security features:

  Instead of freezing your Firefox on a non secure version, consider using the Extended Support Release (ESR). It is designed for businesses that require a cycle time longer between changes to the features, but anyone can use it. ESR is currently based on Firefox 38. It will get updates of security over the coming months, but not to get new features, so changes in Firefox 41 concerning the compatibility of the add-on will not be out for a good time.

  Norton is likely to continue to support the ESR until the new toolbar update is finished, maybe next month. After that, I don't know what they will do because normally they don't take over a small range of versions.

  If you decide to try it, here's how I suggest to install:

  Clean reinstall it

  We use this name, but it isn't about deleting your settings, this is to ensure that the program, files are clean (not incompatible, corrupt or exotic code files). As described below, this process does not disrupt your existing settings. Don't uninstall NOT Firefox, that does not need.

  (A) download a fresh Installer for Firefox 38.3.0esr of https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/all/ in an ideal location. (Scroll down your preferred language).

  (B) the release of Firefox (if any).

  (C) simply rename the program folder, either:

  (Windows 64-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Fx41
  

  (Windows 32-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files\Fx41
  

  (D) run the installer downloaded to (A). It should automatically connect to your existing settings.

  Success?

  Note: Some plugins can only exist in the old folder. If it is missing something essential, present in these files:

  • \Fx41\Plugins
  • \Fx41\browser\plugins

• The addon compatibility?

  Just a thought.
  I had a complete theme I really liked called Silvermel.
  So, with the latest updates, it is more compatible with Firefox. I went to complete themes in Firefox Addons to see if I could find something else I liked and found that 95% of them are not compatible. It is not as bad with my other addons as with complete themes, but I'm still losing the use of 1 or 2 update of Firefox addons.

  Firefox is always talking about how customizable they are and then their advances make less. Improve things to the point where you're tell them improved it is counterproductive.
  Would ask you the developers of Firefox not change the things that the addons must be usable? If they don't then they should not be updated.
  Thank you!

  Thanks for the comments!

  Firefox is built by users for users. Feedback is very important to the development process.

  The best place to leave comments for Firefox is here:
  https://input.Mozilla.org/en-us/feedback/Firefox

  You can also access this page at any time to in Firefox by clicking the Menu icon (the one with three lines, looks a bit like a hamburger), then click the question mark at the bottom of the drop down, then click on 'submit your comments... '. »

  With regard to the compatibility of the add-on broken; updates do not usually break a lot of modules. But right now Firefox is going through major changes in how modules work. We worked closely with add-on developers to ensure that their modules are updated to be compatible with these changes.

  Unfortunately, some developers are trolling or have abandoned their modules in total. You can read more about these changes in the blog of Mozilla post titled The Future of development of Firefox Add-ons

• Verification of the compatibility conducted and ultra firefox slow

  When I started Firefox yesterday (19/05/2015), he said that she was performing a verification of the compatibility of Firefox Add-ons and has been really slow. Entry of a same character is lagging far behind what anyone typing in Firefox. I tried Firefox rearmament and deletion of the recent modules. Firefox seems to work OK in Mode without failure.

  Hi Pubdef, try Disabling graphics hardware acceleration. You will have to perhaps restart Firefox for it to take effect, so save any work first (e.g. you compose mail, documents online that you are editing, etc.).

  Then perform the following steps:

  1. Open the Firefox Options tab as follows, click on the menu button

     

     then select Options .

  2. In the Options of Firefox tab, click Advanced, and then select general.
  3. You will find in the list of parameters, the checkbox use hardware acceleration when available . Uncheck this box.
  4. Now restart Firefox and see if the problems persist.

  In addition, please check the updates for your graphics driver by following the steps in the following knowledge base articles:

  • Troubleshoot extensions, themes, and issues of hardware acceleration to resolve common problems of Firefox
  • Update your graphics drivers to use hardware acceleration and WebGL

  This solve your problems? Please report to us!

  Thank you.

• I'll try to find "compatibility view settings" to add a Web site that I use for work. Help, please!

  I received a 'how to' care how do to be able to view this Web site, but it wants me to download Internet Explorer (excuse me if I say yuck!)...

  If the directions state: under 'Tools', click 'compatibility view settings. Where is said to write 'add this Web site' in the Web site, then click on add and close. Close and restart.

  I live on Mozilla on all my devices. I recommend it to anyone who has not yet been introduced. I cringe to think to be forced to use internet explore!

  Thanks for all you do!

  So I downloaded the addon. Now to set "a different useragent" I go on the site. Click UAControl options for this site? Click Custom, and then enter ' Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ". INTERNET EXPLORER 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)"?