Conflicts with native Firewall VPN

Similar Questions

• Public static political static NAT in conflict with NAT VPN

  I have a situation where I need to create a VPN site-to site between an ASA 5505 using IOS 7.2 and a Sonicwall NSA4500. The problem arises where the LAN behind the Cisco ASA has the same subnet an existing VPN currently created on the Sonicwall. Since the Sonicwall cannot have two VPN both run on the same subnet, the solution is to use policy NAT on the SAA as well as for the Sonicwall, the new VPN seems to have a different subnet.

  The current subnet behind the ASA is 192.168.10.0/24 (The Sonicwall already has a private network virtual created for another customer with the same subnet). I try to translate it to 192.168.24.0/24. The peer LAN (behind the Sonicwall) is 10.159.0.0/24. The ASA relevant configuration is:

  interface Vlan1

  IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.24.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  list of access VPN extended permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.24.0 (inside, outside) - list of VPN access

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  In addition, there are other static NAT instructions and their associated ACLs that allow certain traffic through the firewall on the server, for example:

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface smtp SERVER smtp netmask 255.255.255.255

  The problem is this: when I enter the static strategy statement NAT, I get the message ' WARNING: real-address conflict with existing static "and then it refers to each of the static NAT statements reflecting the external address to the server. I've thought about it, and it seemed to me that the problem was that policy NAT statement must be the first statement of NAT (it is the last one) so that it is run first and all traffic destined to the VPN to the Sonicwall (destination 10.159.0.0/24) tunnel would be properly treated. If I left him as the last statement, then the other static NAT statements would prevent a part of the 10.159.0.0/24 network-bound traffic to be correctly routed through the VPN.

  So, I tried first to my stated policy NAT upward in the ASDM GUI interface. However, moving the declaration was not allowed. Then I tried to delete the five static NAT statements that point to the server (an example is above) and then recreate them, hoping that would then move up the policy statement NAT. This also failed.

  What Miss me?

  Hello

  I assumed that we could have changed the order of the 'static' , the original orders, but as it did not work for some reason any then it seems to me that you suggested or change, that I proposed should work.

  I guess that your purpose was to set up static political PAT for the VPN for some these services, then static PAT of public network access, then static NAT to policy for the rest of the network in-house.

  I guess you could choose any way seems best for you.

  Let me know if get you it working. I always find it strange that the original configuration did not work.

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• Need help with native VPN client for Mac to the Configuration of the VPN router RV082

  Guys,

  I am trying to set up router RV082 VPN Client with native Mac for my remote access. However, no matter what I did, I'm not able to make works. Can any give me an example of how to set my router RV082 and Mac Book Pro (Mountain Lion)?

  Thank you

  Hi Jixian, the native client MAC does not work. The IPSEC VPN client is the same as the 5.x Cisco VPN client is not supported on this device.

  Your alternatives are to use PPTP or a 3rd party IPsec client such as ipsecuritas.

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• problem with windows 2003 vpn servers. and xp pro clients vpn using bridge nic

  I have installed 2 guests windows 2003 on 2 laptops. both are configured with 1 CC of backend and frontend 1 nat/vpn server that has 2 interfaces, a bridge and one configured for host only.

  I configure nat on both servers windows 2003 rras and vpn services and have them connected to my local network. they are able to access internet, ping between them and other computers on the network, as well as the host systems on which they run.

  the problem is that I am not able to connect to the vpn servers remotely from inside a guest virtual machine. I wanted to try a vpn site-to site between the guests 2 windows 2003, but the operation failed.

  I then tested customer to type of a guest virtual computer pro xp vpn server. It is also a failure.

  but I discovered that if I initiate a VPN from any one of the host computer system laptop or another computer on the physical network I am able to connect to the vpn servers I have set up.

  I wish I could have these laptops to operate normally and

  time to time be able to turn on virtual machines with vpn

  servers and test as dfs things and replication active directory as if

  they were running 2 separate real-world offices. the two laptops have invited Setup for 192.168.0.0 networks with subnet mask 255.255.255.192. each host that it supposed to be running a 1 subnet for the popular virtual machine with the servers vpn/nat connect together the 2 sites.

  laptop computers are running xp pro and vista ultimate as the host systems. I'm only using the windows firewall but also tested with them disabled vpn connections. also launches the service ipsec on laptops to secure internal lan traffic, I have also tested with two guests with disabled ipsec.

  is there something I'm missing here with the installation of the vmware bridge network?

  Oh I forgot to mention, I test using pptp and ms-chap v2

  I managed to do work by unchecking the tcp/ip settings and the microsoft file sharing on the bridged NIC resaeau.

  now it works very well but who explain to me why it cannot work when you are using the same network as the host card. they all have two different ip addresses and mac addresses. but something seems to be in conflict

• Connection with the client VPN for RV110W problem

  Hi guys: I just installed a RV110W router to my small business and I try to connect via VPN from home client.  I was unable to do so, no matter what I try.  Relevant information:

  1. I can connect to the router via remote very well management, so I know that the router is accessible from the Net.

  2. internal address of the router: 10.81.208.1

  3. active PPTP.  PPTP server IP address: 10.0.0.1

  4 IP addresses for PPTP clients: 10.0.0.10 - 14

  5. two VPN clients added - one with PPTP, with the QuickVPN Protocol Protocol.  Both are enabled (and Yes, I triple checked passwords)

  6 encryption MPPE and Netbios active.

  7 IPSec, PPTP and L2TP all active gateways.

  8 VPN client: 1.4.1.2

  9. computer: laptop running Windows 7 family (64-bit), with the firewall Windows is activated.

  10 home network: 192.168.2.196

  It is causing to tear my hair out.  What Miss me?

  Shannon

  Hi Shannon,

  I am pleased to see that you're progress.

  Shannon Rotz wrote:
  I changed the RM port to 443.  Unfortunately, now I can't connect to the router via browser, either by remote management or from the local network - I get the usual "page cannot be displayed".  How do I get back into the router configuration GUI?
  

  You should be able to reach the GUI by typing https://192.168.1.1(assuming that you have not changed the default IP address) normally once you replace http (port 80) with https (port 443) the internal router web server automatically will redirect you to the https page if you type http. Open your command prompt and try to do a ping of the IP address of the router to ensure that it still meets this address

  With regards to the VPN client:   Up until I changed the port, the same error message kept coming up, i.e. "Unable to establish connection" (or something like that), with a list of possible reasons why it couldn't connect. Now the message has changed - I'm getting "Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer".  If I continue trying to connect, then it says "Activating Policy", followed by "Verifying Network", then "The remote gateway is not responding.  Do you want to wait?"  This is definitely progress, since I never got this far before.

  You are a quarter inch offline. If you look at the log.txt in C:\Program Cisco Small Business\QuickVPN Client, in my view, you will see "Failed to ping router remote VPN! This means that your PC is blocking the ping to the router response. Usually, if you look at this point the status of Client VPN in the router (first of all need to remote management) you will see that your user status is "connected." If the router thinks that the connection is established, but the PC does not work. You might want to try another PC at this stage to verify that it is indeed a problem with your PC. This problem is usually caused by the 3rd party software antivirus/firewall blocking the ping response. Microsoft Security Essentials can do this as well, so if you turn it off. If you do not have another PC to test from, call Cisco Small Business Support and ask a technician, try to connect to the lab. You can find the number to call here

  On an impulse, I tried setting up a Windows VPN connection, i.e. created a new VPN connection in Network and Sharing Center, using a PPTP client ID that I had created.  That connection actually worked, except for one problem:  I can't see the remote network.  If I could solve that problem, I'll just tell the other clients to use a Windows connection rather than QuickVPN.
  

  Good thought. If you do not see the remote devices, make sure that they do not block VPN connections. (Windows or third-party firewall, antivirus, antispyware) With a connection, PPTP or QuickVPN, you should be able to go to run, type the IP address of the device that you want to connect to (i.e. \\192.168.1.101 ) and see the list of shared folders. After the PPTP connection is established, try to ping the address LAN IP of the router. If it is successful, try to ping a LAN device such as a network printer or a PC. Again, PCs may block ping requests if they have a firewall running watch so for this.

  Answer please if you have any questions.

• IOS mixed Crypto Maps with Checkpoint Firewall

  I have a config encryption that works very well with a remote CheckPoint Firewall:

  -------------- \/ CONFIG 1 \/--------------------

  crypto ISAKMP policy 5

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  !

  ISAKMP crypto key address 1.2.3.4 cryptokey1

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac txfrmset1

  !

  crypto dynamic-map vpn Dynamics 10

  Set transform-set txfrmset1

  !

  secure1_in card crypto ipsec isakmp 1

  defined by peer 205.245.184.2

  Set transform-set txfrmset1

  match address 105

  !

  IP nat inside source overload map route sheep interface Ethernet0

  !

  sheep allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 110

  !

  access-list 105 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255

  ------------/\ CONFIG 1 /\ --------------------

  I need to add a card for remote clients using the Cisco VPN 3.6 client.

  I have a card encryption that has worked great for me in the past. The combination

  Both looks like this:

  ---------------\/ CONFIG 2 \/ --------------------------

  Nine AAA

  AAA authentication login userauthen local

  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

  crypto ISAKMP policy 5

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  cryptokey1 key crypto isakmp address 1.2.3.4 No.-xauth

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac txfrmset1

  !

  crypto dynamic-map vpn Dynamics 10

  Set transform-set txfrmset1

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group remote1

  cryptokey2 key

  DNS 10.0.0.4

  WINS 10.0.0.5

  VPN-pool

  !

  card crypto client secure1_in of authentication list userathen

  card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor secure1_in

  client configuration address card crypto secure1_in answer

  secure1_in map ipsec-isakmp crypto 5

  defined peer 1.2.3.4

  Set transform-set txfrmset1

  match address 105

  vpnclient 10-isakmp ipsec vpn dynamic-dynamic crypto map

  !

  IP VPN-pool pool 172.16.30.1 room 172.16.30.254

  IP nat inside source overload map route sheep interface Ethernet0

  access-list 105 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  access-list 110 deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 110 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  sheep allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 110

  ---------------/\ CONFIG 2 /\---------------------------

  It's classic crypto right out of the playbook of Cisco. This card works

  very well with the Cisco VPN client, but produced the following errors after a

  successful with Checkpoint Firewall P1 installation:

  --------------\/ ERROR OUTPUT \/ -----------------------

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): send package to 1.2.3.4 (R) MM_KEY_EXCH

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE

  Former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): need to config/address

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): need to config/address

  05:13:02: ISAKMP: node set 1502565681 to CONF_ADDR

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): pool of IP addresses not defined for ISAKMP.

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): node 1502565681 error suppression FALSE reason «»

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE

  Former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_CONFIG_MODE_SET_SENT

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): 1.2.3.4 received packet (R) CONF_ADDR

  05:13:02: ISAKMP: node set-1848822857 to CONF_ADDR

  05:13:02: ISAKMP (0:2): entry unknown: status = IKE_CONFIG_MODE_SET_SENT, major, minor = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE

  05:13:04: ISAKMP (0:2): 1.2.3.4 received packet (R) CONF_ADDR

  --------------/\ ERROR OUTPUT /\--------------------------

  This does not happen to config 1. If it's a PIX, I would use the

  No.-config-mode keyword after the No.-xauth on isakmp crypto "key."

  command line. It is not available on IOS IPSEC and I have never

  needed to do before. I am running Cisco IOS 12.2 (5.4) T on a VPN of 1721

  router. The static map seems to work by itself. What I am doing wrong?

  I saw her a couple of times and to be honest have never taken down to an exact cause, although in this case it looks like almost to the point of control request an IP address which is weird. Try the following:

  1. Add "card crypto secure1_in client configuration address to initiate" and see what it does.

  2. try 12.2 (8) code T5 with it, I had a previous user running 12.2 (11) T and we got the same error messages, returning to this level of code it is resolved.

  In addition, you wouldn't need:

  > access-list 110 deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.30.0 0.0.0.255

  for example, so that you do not NAT client VPN traffic?

• Avast free with comodo firewall - READ-

  I read that these two running together will cause no conflict as long as you clear the sandbox in Avast and comodo firewall but my main question is which is the best way to install
  First avast then restart then Comodo firewall or vice versa any help would be thank you very much.

  Hello

  Frankly I run Avast and forget about Comodo or any firewall left 3rd. Use of the Windows Firewall
  that is extremely effective. Most routers today also have a built-in firewall hardware that works
  Well well with Windows Firewall software.

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Low-cost 3rd part firewall software are quite a lot of problems delayed. They all have
  compatibility, issues and offer only a few improved controls. In fact their problems often actually lower
  the overall security instead of laying. The Windows Firewall has no problem of compatibility and is
  extremely safe, if you know enough to work around most of the hype. Cost of firewalls software quality
  thousands. Most routers have hardware firewalls built in and those are much better additions
  for the money than any firewall at low prices and low-cost software.

  How to change the Notification settings of Windows in Windows 7 firewall - see also related articles
  section at the fair before the response section.
  http://www.SevenForums.com/tutorials/523-Windows-Firewall-change-notification-settings.html

  How to manage the firewall of Windows 7.
  http://www.thewindowsclub.com/how-to-manage-Windows-7-firewall

  How do I add or remove a Windows Firewall Exception in Windows 7
  http://www.SevenForums.com/tutorials/542-Windows-Firewall-Add-Remove-exception.html

  How to use Windows Firewall with advanced security in Vista (also Windows 7)
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/92748-Windows-Firewall-Advanced-Security.html

  What's new in the Windows 7 firewall?
  http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/whats-new-Windows-7-firewall.html

  How to enable or disable Windows Firewall in Windows 7
  http://www.SevenForums.com/tutorials/522-Windows-Firewall-turn-off.html

  ------------------------------

  Avast and Prevx proved extremely reliable and compatible with all I have
  launched on them. Microsoft Security Essentials and Prevx have also proven to be very
  reliable and compatible. Use MSE or Avast and Prevx, Prevx 3 but not all.

  Avast Home free - stop any shields is not necessary except leave the file system, Web,.
  Operational network (Script and behavior are also recommended in Ver 6 +).

  Prevx - Home - free

  Windows Firewall

  Windows Defender (is not necessary if you use MSE)

  Protected IE - mode

  IE 8 - SmartScreen filter WE (IE 7 phishing filter)

  I also IE always start with asset if filter InPrivate IE 8.
  (It may temporarily turn off with the little icon to the left of the + bottom
  right of IE)

  Two versions of Avast are available 6.x and 4.8 x

  Avast - home - free - 6.x stop shields you do not use (except files, Web, network, &)
  Shields of behavior) - double click on the icon in the Notification area - real time Orange - click on the
  Shield that you want to stop - STOP. To stop the Orange icon to show an error indicator-
  Click on the Orange icon - top right - settings - click on the status bar - uncheck shields you
  disabled - click OK
  http://www.avast.com/free-antivirus-download

  Avast 4.8 x - home - free - stop shields, you don't need except leaving Standard, Web,.
  and the network running. (Double-click the blue icon - look OK. - upper left - Shields details
  Finish those you don't use).
  http://www.avast.com/free-antivirus-download#TAB4

  Or use Microsoft Security Essentials - free
  http://www.Microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/

  Prevx works well alongside MSE or Avast

  Prevx - home - free small, fast, exceptional protection CLOUD, working with other security
  programs. It is a single scanner, VERY EFFICIENT, if it finds something come back here
  or use Google to see how to remove.
  http://www.prevx.com/   <-->
  http://info.prevx.com/downloadcsi.asp?prevx=Y<-->

  Choice of PCmag editor - Prevx-
  http://www.PCMag.com/Article2/0, 2817,2346862,00.asp

  Also get Malwarebytes - free - use as scanner only. If you ever think malware and that
  would be unusual with Avast and occasional Prevx running with the exception of a low level cookie
  (not much), to UPDATE and then run it as a scanner. I have a lot of scanners and they
  never find anything of note that I started to use this configuration.
  http://www.Malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free

  I hope this helps. Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP - Windows Expert - consumer: bike - Mark Twain said it right.

• Problem with remote access VPN

  Hello

  I installed a remote access VPN on my firewall ASA5505 via the ASDM Assistant.

  I can successfully connect with the Cisco VPN client. My firewall also shows me the VPN session and shows the Rx packets. However, Tx packets remain 0, so no traffic is getting out. My ASA5505 is configured as a router on a stick with 25 different VLAN. I want to restrict traffic to one VLAN specific using a card encryption.

  When I run a command to ping t on my connected Windows box, the firewall log shows me the following message:

  "Unable to find political IKE initiator: outside Intf, Src: 10.7.11.18, Dst: ' 172.16.1.1

  "This message indicates that the fast path IPSec processing a packet that triggered of IKE, but IKE policy research has failed. This error could be associated calendar. The ACL triggering IKE could have been deleted before IKE has processed the request for initiation. "This problem will likely correct itself."

  Unfortunately, the problem is correct.

  The "sh cry isa his" and "sh cry ips its ' commands show the following output:

  2 IKE peers: 62.140.137.99

  Type: user role: answering machine

  Generate a new key: no State: AM_ACTIVE

  Interface: outside

  Tag crypto map: SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP, seq num: 65535, local addr: 85.17.xxx.xxx (outside interface IP)

  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0)

  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.16.1.1/255.255.255.255/0/0)

  current_peer: 62.140.137.99, username: eclipsevpn

  dynamic allocated peer ip: 172.16.1.1

  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0

  #pkts decaps: 4351, #pkts decrypt: 4351, #pkts check: 4351

  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0

  #pkts uncompressed: 0, comp #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0

  success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0

  Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0

  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  local crypto endpt. : 85.17.xxx.xxx/4500, remote Start crypto. : 62.140.137.99/3698

  Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 82, media, mtu 1500

  current outbound SPI: B3D60F71

  current inbound SPI: B89BA14A

  SAS of the esp on arrival:

  SPI: 0xB89BA14A (3097207114)

  transform: aes - esp esp-sha-hmac no compression

  running parameters = {RA, Tunnel, NAT-T program,}

  slot: 0, id_conn: 196608, crypto-card: SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP

  calendar of his: service life remaining key (s): 25126

  Size IV: 16 bytes

  support for replay detection: Y

  Anti-replay bitmap:

  0xFFE1FFF8 0xFFFFFFFF

  outgoing esp sas:

  SPI: 0xB3D60F71 (3017150321)

  transform: aes - esp esp-sha-hmac no compression

  running parameters = {RA, Tunnel, NAT-T program,}

  slot: 0, id_conn: 196608, crypto-card: SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP

  calendar of his: service life remaining key (s): 25126

  Size IV: 16 bytes

  support for replay detection: Y

  Anti-replay bitmap:

  0x00000000 0x00000001

  I really have no idea what's going on. I installed a remote access VPN countless times, but this time it shows me the error as described above.

  Hi Martijn,

  just a few quick thoughts:

  -is your ok NAT exemption, i.e. ensure that the return traffic is not NAT' ed.

  -Make sure that there is no overlap crypto ACL

  -When connected, make a package tracer to see what is happening with the return packages.

  for example

  packet-tracer in the interface within the icmp 10.7.11.18 0 0 172.16.1.1 detail

  (where is the name of the interface on which 10.7.11.18 resides)

  This will show you all the steps the rail package in-house (routing, nat, encryption etc.) so it should give you an idea of what is happening, for example when it comes to the bad interface, nat evil rule, wrong entry card crypto etc.

  HTH

  Herbert
  

• Firewall VPN, VMs and VLAN

  It is just a simple example to help me understand.

  Let's salsa in my data center, I have a simple setup with 1 firewall (LAN port) connected to the server physical 1' data network port. The server has two network, 1 data and 1 management ports.

  3 branch offices are connected to the WAN port on the firewall via VPN, and each office is on a separate subnet. The firewall is capable of creating VLANs of course. For example, I can direct traffic to office 1 to go to the VLAN 1 which is the 1st Port of the firewall.

  The requirement is that each office wants their own virtual machines. Virtual machines for an office are not allowed to talk to other virtual machines for other offices.

  How can I set up? How I would order traffic to office 1 to go to the VLAN1 where VMs for Office 1 would also live and then do the same for Office 2 & 3? I need 3 network ports (one for each office) on the physical server to accomplish this or I could use "vSwitch' function?

  No additional need to NICs. We establish Setup with existing maps.

  1. create 3 VLANs (for example: 11,12 and 13) for each office.

  2. set the switch port physical/firewall which is connected to taking data network of servers in TRUNK mode. Its to allow the traffic of all the VLANS.

  3. create 3 exchanges in vswitch (for example: 1, 2 and 3 office)

  4 VLANs for each card exchanges.

  VLAN 11-> office1

  VLAN 12-> office2

  VLAN 13-> guidelines3

  5. connect the virtual machines to their respective trade.

• Firefox is in conflict with pxhlpa64.sys

  (1) installed firefox 25 and auditor of race and got the 1st BSOD pxhlpa64.sys

  (2) installed run fix automatix and fix all clicked again.

  (3) restarted with the Auditor, got the 2nd pxhlpa64.sys BSOD

  (4) automatic fix does not resolve pxhlpa64.sys.

  (5) Firefox uninstalled, run the checker no. BSOD

  100000% sure for my conclusion that firefox is in conflict with pxhlpa64.sys.

  With firefox installed, two of my discs were read and write, but not safe for writing perfect.

  Fix it please I run win7 64 bit, registered.

  http://www.SevenForums.com/BSOD-help-support/295136-BSOD-restart-watching-DVD-incomplete-start-11.html#post2611617

• Satellite R840 - 12 c - conflict with the RFBUS "Bluetooth."

  My Toshiba Satellite R840 - 12 c has a problem with bluetooth.

  On the Device Manager tab, I see a conflict with the RFBUS "Bluetooth."
  So my bluetooth setting does not work... In other words my laptop cannot detect bluetooth despite being bluetooth devices "on"...

  > Tab in Device Manager, I see a conflict with the "Bluetooth RFBUS.
  So uninstall the device first, then download the stack of BT from Toshiba BT portal and after reboot again install this new.
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/Bluetooth/

• Re: Satellite P300 - conflict with the display driver

  Yesterday, I suddenly had a conflict with my display driver. While working on my laptop, a blue screen appeared and then the screen went black and stayed like that. When you use an external monitor, it is possible to start in SafeMode (in normal mode, a blue screen appears). It is possible that a Windows Update has occurred, but I can nog
  cancel anything (no Windows recovery point).

  I uninstalled the display driver and downloaded the latest version, but it doesn't seem to help. Reinstalling Windows won't work or the other cause the installation DVD detects a hardware error (the display driver).

  Does anyone knows how to fix this?

  Kind regards
  Jeroen

  Hey Buddy,

  > Reinstall Windows won't work or the other cause the installation DVD detects a hardware error (the display driver).
  What Windows disk, you used exactly?
  Normally before starting with the installation of Windows, you must format the hard disk and create partitions. If everything is clean at the disk Windows installation starts.

  I advise to use the Toshiba recovery disc. This disk can restore the original settings of the case and before Installation starts the drive HARD to wipe completely.

• El capitan is in conflict with my printer.

  El capitan upgrade is in conflict with my Kodak printer. I would like to delete el capitan from my computer. How can I do?

  El Capitan is the operating system. You can not remove it. The computer would not go.

  What do you mean, exactly, by "competitor" with your printer?

  Barry

• 800 - 030qe envy: conflict with the new video card

  I bought and installed an EVGA GEForce GTX960 graphics card and discovered a conflict with the SATA cable on the motherboard connector. EVGA has recommended that I find a SATA cable with a connector at right angles. Can anyone suggest a source for a suitable cable? Mine is red (?).

  @bobsun2, welcome to the forum.

  This is a cable that should work for you.

  Please click on the button + Thumbs up if I helped you and click on accept as Solution If your problem is resolved.

• Toshiba software conflicts with Microsoft and prevent the wireless connection

  The Toshiba Software on this laptop I have is causing a conflict with Microsoft software and I can't connect wirelessly to an ad - hoc network. Wireless Auto configuration does not automatically start as Toshiba Software is causing a conflict, above, this rolling. If you have also encountered this problem please can you me what you can do to permanently solve this problem? For the moment, I have to go through a process of manually start the Wireless Zero Configuration services and fiddling around with disable and then re-enable wireless network connections if I'm lucky then it finally works, and I have internet! If you are unsure how to permanently solve this problem you know what the telephone support number is for Toshiba UK?

  Thank you very much

  John

  Hello John

  What model of laptop and operating system are you using?
  Do you use the preinstalled original Toshiba OS?

  If you want to talk with Toshiba Toshiba s call hotline in the United Kingdom. The number is on the Toshiba UK support page.