Connect together two switches SRW 2024

Similar Questions

• Connect together two GUI.

  Hi everyone, the joint is my GUI. Im trying to create two modes of the system. the first (running by optimization) who will be using this interface.

  the second (manual mode), which I want to move to a different GUI where I choose what he MORE stop the first GUI .and (running by optimization) when I back off the (ongoing optimization mode) I want (manual mode GUI) to stop.

  will it be possible?

  Please help me.

  Thank you very much

  
  

• A VM NIC connected to 2 switches?

  After you migrate a VM (with 2 network cards) of vSwitchs for a new dvSwitchs of the host is connected to two switches.

  Before:

  NIC1 - vswitch network 1

  NIC2 - vswitch network 2

  After:

  NIC1 - vswitch network 1 & 1 network dvSwitch

  NIC2 - vswitch network 2 & dvSwitch network 2

  Why the virtual computer is connected to both switches? (Each NETWORK adapter is connected to 2 switches)

  Not when you look at the view of VM, from this point of view it s only connected new dvswitch ehe, but the svitch discovers its connected at a time.

  Concerning

  Jan

  The virtual machine has snapshots? As long as there are snapshots that were created while the virtual machine was connected to the vSwitches, they will appear in the virtual machine of summer. This information is retained in case you want to revert to the snapshot.

  André

• Connect FI two directly attach FCoE storage and SAN switches

  Nobody tells me if I can connect FI two directly attach FCoE and SAN storage switches also, as you can see in the diagram of connected network?

  If so, should I FC Switch function Mode? Any concerns should I consider?

  Or the best solution would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  The UCS will be in Switch Mode FC, which means that it has a default area.  We cannot make a Zone merge with Brocade because we have no control to set up specific items such as domain and other articles CF IDS that need to be changed when you connect a Cisco FC switch to a Brocade.

  Usually in this situation with a 5 k or a MDS you might be placed in mode of interoperability, which changes the default settings and we will talk to them together - in this case, you can't change these settings, so the only supported configuration is CF Cisco at Cisco.

  See you soon,.

  Greg Scarlett.

• Connect two switch stacks without stack...

  OK, so we have a stack SG500 and another pile of SG500XG, we would like to connect the two piles together using a Direct attach cable (which we also used to create batteries).

  It is possible to attach the two piles together in this way without the two piles becomes a battery? (we have reasons that we do not want a big stack)

  I hope this makes sense?  Any ideas appreciated.

  Unfortunately no, if you use stacking cables and connect them to the switch equipment automatically reads the cable and start the process without any input from the end user.

  The only other option can think off is to create an etherchannel between the batteries have 1 battery as L2 L3 Garland battery like that

• I have a Linksys SRW 2024 switch but no cable series, how can I get/buy one?

  I bought my SRW 2024 on internet, it is delevered to me without the serial cable. How can I get/buy such a cable?

  I need the cable because I made a mistake and the switch is not very by web to cause any more. The management is connectet to one vlan where no ports are connected to more.

  Thanks for help.

  I recommend you to contact your distributor/supplier for a cable as it must be included with all orders valid.  Except that no matter what 9-pin (DB9) standard serial cable that can be purchased from an electronic retailer Frye Electronics, Micro Center, etc. should suffice.

  Best regards

• Can damage the FPGA module if I connect accidentally two pins writing together.

  My current configuration has a PXI chassis with two FPGA modules.  Each FPGA module has an adaptation Module 6581 on that.  I would like to test the signal through my system path by having the user to move some cables that would be a reason for a return to the other looping FPGA.

  I fear, however, the risk of the user is not correctly as shown and somehow a channel available in writing that connects to another channel write-enabled.  This damage to the FPGA or adaptation modules?

  Hi Brian,.

  Your concerns are correct. We never want to connect two pins that are output voltage. If two pins are outputs digital mistakenly connecting them together may damage one or both nodes in output since there is nowhere to flow the potential.

  It is well to connect to two pins that read a voltage. If both pins running entry digital (reading of the pins), as there is no risk, nor pin would be likely to be damaged.

• I have only 2 computers, a desktop computer and a laptop computer. Yet, every time I switch from one to the other, I get a message that I am already connected to TWO. It's impossible because I only have 2 and it is not connected. Any suggestions on fixing

  I have only 2 computers, a desktop computer and a laptop computer. Yet, every time I switch from one to the other, I get a message that I am already connected to TWO. It's impossible because I only have 2 and it is not connected. Any suggestions on fixing that?

  Hi Kelly,

  Maximum machines, the license can be activated is 2. Somehow, it seems that on your side the same license can be activated on any 3rd machine as well.

  Activating the license on any other machine, please select the option to disconnect all other devices and try again.

  Reference: connect and disconnect activate Cloud Creative applications (deactivated)

  Kind regards

  Sheena

• connect the m6220 switches stacked to existing Lan infrastructure

  I need to connect two powerconnect M6220 to LAN infrastructure existing.

  The switch of two are configured in the stack.

  Which is the best way to uplink the new switch to the other two powerconnect 5548.

  The old switch are not stacked and bound together by two 10GB Ethernet cable (one of the links is disabled).

  I need to implement the network tolerant to failures, maybe I need to configure the tree covering weight on the two links of 10 GB.

  I use Spanning tree to configure the uplink between the old and the new, too?

  Is there a better alternative? There is another way to prevent the loop network?

  Thanks, Francesco

  You have a few options.

  1. you can simply connect the cables between the M6220 switch stack and the 5548.  Set up a trunk connection which allows for VLAN needed overall.  Tree covering weight until it is enabled on the switch and not off on specific ports connecting the default switches prevent loops and allow the most profitable link to be active, leaving the second connection as an alternative link in a blocking state.

  2. you can configure LAG (aggregation of links).  This is where you configure the individual physical ports in a virtual port channel.  This indicates a covering tree to treat multiple physical ports as a single link aggregated to the other switch.  You will need to have the port at each end of the connection channel mapping. (On each switch).  This allows the same speed but more flow.  To move traffic more.

• OK to mix 'of connection to the switch"and"close relay switch?

  Hi all

  I'm developing a test sequence using the card multiplexer 2527 to the track signals.  To configure the card, I use DAQmx switch functions.  In my application, I have a Subvi routine that imports the data from a spreadsheet Setup and run a loop for to set the configuration for each step (each iteration of the loop contains the channel for 2527 card information).  The topology is set on the first iteration, as well as the configuration of the path to the first string.

  My concern is this: I need to close the extra channels/relays without changing the topology or resetting the device.  In the first round, I use "connection to the switch" function to set the initial path, (ch0 to com0 for example).  Then in subsequent iterations of the loop, I use "Relay close switch" function to close the additional channels individually (for example k2).  In the end, when the measure is taken, both ch0 ch2 must be closed and routed to com0.  This implementation is so sure, or am I somehow to make the adjustments to the initial loop?

  I would like to test this with the hardware, but it is not yet available.

  Also, I realize that I could use independent topology and configure all relays individually for each step, but I hope that my approach will be easier and safer.

  Please notify.  Thank you.

  GSinMN

  Hello GSinMN,

  It's OK to mix 'of connection to the switch"and"Close relay switch"If you understand what's happening below. "Switch Connect" connects two channels by closing a path of relay between the channels, then "Close relay switch" can be used to change the State of the individual relays. If you are not careful you can mess up your connection by activating / deactivating relays that are part of the route connecting your channels.

  "Also, I realize that I could use independent topology and configure all relays individually for each step, but I hope that my approach will be easier and safer."

  I would recommend the topology independent if you want to stick with connections to channels only. http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/375472G-01/switch/2527_independent/

  Initial connection:

  CH0-> pcom0

  pcom0plus-> icom0plus

  pcom0minus-> icom0minus

  icom0-> com0

  In each future iteration just connect to the next to pcom0 channel (which will be indirectly connect it to com0):

  CH1-> pcom0

  CH2-> pcom0

  ...

  ...

  Jarrod

• Connectivity between two piles of Dell 2048

  Hi guys, I'm very new to the configuration of the switches. We have a small office and just implement a new data room. We have 4 switches of POE Dell 2048 x stacked for VOIP and PCs phones and 2 x Dell 2048 switches stacked to our servers. I have 4 x 10 gb twinax cables to connect the two heaps as in the pic below:

  

  What is the best way to implement these four connections? I tried to do a SHIFT of four ports in each stack, and it seemed to fall some ping until I disabled STP for the LAG group. I'm a little worried about turning off STP however. These are the only switches that are on the network. Any ideas on what the best config for this would be appreciated. Sorry, as I said I am quite new to this.

  Thanks, Dave

  Hi guys,.

  Just to wrap this I configured LACP on the mentioned LAG today and now, she purrs like a kitten.

  See you soon,.

  Dave

• Connect the redundant switch

  Hello

  I have several Dell 2724 switches that I would like to set up redundantly.

  I joined two 2724 s with a trunk. I would now like to connect the access switch with one connection to each of the two switches to shared resources. One cable in switch1 everything works. Put the second cable switch2 and all breaks loose.

  Option1 = Switch2 (LAG)

  \       /

  Switch3

  Can someone tell me if it works and how?

  Thank you

  This kind of configuration can operate with switches that offer spanning tree or MLAG. But the 27xx series switches do not offer these features. With this type of installation, there is a loop that will cause a continual broadcast storm that will wreak havoc on the network. Your best form of redundancy will link redundancy switch, but you will not be able to get the redundancy of switch with 27xx switches.

  Switch1 SWITCH2

  \\       //

  Switch3

  Or

  Option1 = Switch2

  //

  Switch3

  Or

  Option1 = Switch2

  \\

  Switch3

  See you soon

• I have configured Link Aggregation on two Switch SF300

  The two links connect to both switches via two radios. The problem is that I can't access the attached radios http interface:

  radio_on_aggregation.PNG

  

  Everything else works fine and the radios are passing data according to PRTG monitoring of the towed gear

  Thank you

  Well, it looks like this is it.
  She looks like that ever, you can manage your bridges because of this.

  This is due to the notion of the Association and its operation
  L3 from the IP address of bridge management package can never be process as the etherchannel does not recognize. He treats only packets from his peers, etherchannel port in the etherchannel port.

  Overall, you cannot manage your bridges, to put it simply

• Linking the two switches SF300-8 and gvrp

  After passing the age trying to propagate VLAN one SF300 to another, I think that I finally did it.  It seems that we must implement the GVRP Protocol on both sides of the trunk AND manually create the VLAN on the slave switch.  Now I can ping machines on the two switches that share the same VLAN successfully.

  However; If I try and ping a machine on the passage of the slave from outside in the VLAN, which is a connection routed the master switch, it fails, succeeds the ping of a machine on the main switch.

  What I am doing wrong?

  Hi Nigel, GVRP is basically a terrible (and useless) Protocol.

  GVRP not to dispose of anything, unless it is predefined to what it can affect, the manually fresh General requirements is greater than the configuration comes actually port.

  Configuring you mentioned basically tells me that you built manually the trunk as vlan 1 UNTAG, tag 11 and 42. The GVRP Protocol should do it for you if it is properly implemented.

  To work successfully the port GVRP must send the GVRP join messages, the interface of the receiver must be configured to receive the join messages and then the database of VLAN switch advertising must have these VLANS constructed/defined manually as they are underway in the messages...

  If you need using the configuration, do not hesitate to post what is your goal, I'm sure I or someone can help you if you provide a network, the schema and configuration files.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Should two switches for the installation of iSCSI SAN - be stacked

  I mean by "stacked" should they be hung by backplane?  Reference Dell passes, btw.

  Just two hosts connected to an iSCSI SAN.

  If the goal is to be completely redundant, your server is able to cable a physical NIC directly on each switch and your San can connect to both switches, there is no reason for the connections between these switches. Stacking of the switches can provide options for a large number of cases, but I don't think it will be here.