Connection of the GigE Vision camera

Hello

I develop a GigE Vision camera.

I want to connect GigE Vision Camera to NIMAX.

When you first connect GigE Vision camera, I can see the NOR-IMAQdx list devices. ("cam0:mycamera")

When I click on "cam0:mycamera", a the IMAQ error has occurred.

Error message is "cannot load the XML of the camera.

Attached file is the package that was the problem.

MAX OR send command "Read memory" to retrieve the device XML configuration file.

(Package no. 11, 13: address 0x200, 0 x 400 memory read command)

GigE Vision camera send response.

(No. 12, 14 package: XML URL first choice, second choice of URL)

I think the number of package 12 and 14 are erroneous data, but I can't find the point of evil.

Advice me please on this issue.

I would be greateful to receive the sample package.

Thank you.

Hi hkgige,

These questions can be better adapted to the Committee mailing list GigE Vision standard, I suppose that your company would be a member to develop a device with the GigE Vision standard.

However, I take a look at your track of package and I don't see anything that looks obviously incorrect. One of the reasons why the software could stop after reading the two URLS, is that he thinks he has already downloaded the file previously. These are cached in a directory on your local system (usually C:\Users\Public\Documents\National Instruments\NI-IMAQdx\Data\XML on Vista and Windows 7). Check if you have the XML file for your camera.

The error you get usually indicates GenICam has some difficulty in parsing the XML of your camera. If you join the XML itself, I could see if this is the problem.

Eric

Tags: NI Hardware

Similar Questions

  • XML file for GigE Vision camera

    Hello

    I'm working on a model of GigE Vision camera. It should be very simple linescan camera. I put in place the necessary set of registers GigE Vision, can communicate with the camera in MAX. The problem is that I need creata this XML file for the camera. There is this here XML file:

    http://www.EMVA.org/CMS/upload/standards/GenICam_Downloads/SFNC_Reference_Version_2_0_0_Schema_1_1.x...

    What should I do with it? My first version of the camera will have 2 functions: turn on and off I'm confused, because the model xml file has many functions, I don't really have. Should I remove them? Or leave it inside with default values? That she needs a configuration minimum XML file?

    Kind regards

    Linus

    Hi Linus,

    If you look at the GigE Vision specification, you will see that there is a minimal subset of functionality that must be present for the camera be declared compliant. That's all what IMAQdx will need for the camera works fine. All other functions in the XML file that you downloaded are part of the SFNC (features Standard Naming Convention) defines the names/behavior for common characteristics that are often found on machine vision cameras. As a general rule, cameras implement a subset of these features. You should not let any features that are not implemented in the XML because it would be just confused because they would do nothing.

    Eric

  • Do IMAQdx and NI GigE Vision 2.0 material support?

    Hello

    From my brief research, GigE Vision 2.0 has features very nice that I'm at the end which are not supported by previous GigE Vision 1.x standards:

    • Compression on the side of the camera

    • Timestamp and sync IEEE 1588 (PTP)

    OR those taking? If not, are there any plans to add support in the near future?

    Thank you!

    Hi again,

    Thanks for the extra frame.

    Assuming that your only using the camera is saving JPEG images on the disk, and you are concerned about the performance of the acquisition system, I think that an IP camera might be a better choice. These cameras acquire images compressed, so you can very well save the direct-to-disk with no extra charge. This will save time and bandwidth of the network processor. The bandwidth would be nice because you could probably just run 6 cameras in a gigabit switch and connect to a port on the PXI chassis instead of several 8234 ports. This is possible because not only if bandwidth is reduced, but the IP cameras can use TCP and sharing bandwidth much more enjoyable that can cameras GigE vision. To save the raw images on the disk, you can use the IMAQdx VI "Get Image Data", which is a JPEG file that you can save directly to an IP camera.

    Regarding the time stamp data, depends on the accuracy required. Since you recorded all the time after that image returned, is quite imprecise because it is not really correlate with the acquisition time. You might get a more exact time in two ways: record IMAQdx a CPU timestamp on receipt of driver that you can use (useful if the CPU is synchronized to GPS/NTP or similar) or you can use a timestamp saved in the image itself in the form of metadata (GigE Vision and IP cameras can do that). I think the Basler IP cameras can use NTP and testify to the time stamp for metadata EXIF JPEG images that you can extract. This mechanism is of course much more precise because it eliminates the delay/jitter of transmission at the time. If you have a few requirements of precision (microsec, milliseconds, seconds?), it would probably give a better idea of what your options are.

    I suggest you take a look at the range of cameras from Basler IP. You can not control the parameters of the image directly in the IMAQdx driver (you must use their web interface, or write additional HTTP code), but once you have the configured device it will keep these settings.

    http://www.baslerweb.com/en/products/network-cameras/IP-fixed-box-cameras

    It is likely that the cameras will be more expensive that some cheaper GigE Vision cameras can be, but I suspect that you could save enough on other system costs will in this way to make up for it. In my opinion, doing compression JPEG on-the-fly with 350 + MB/sec of camera raw data could be difficult, unless you had a tough multi-core system.

    Eric

  • GigE vision on OR cRIO-9068

    Hello:

    We are planning a project in which we intend to use embedded vision and transformation of vision GigE cameras. Our client is interested in the cRIO-9068 embedded platform.

    The question is: is there support for GigE Vision on the cRIO-9068?

    I can't find a document that says, so I guess that no public support is granted. If this is the case, I would like to know why.  I think that the VxWorks targets do not GigE support, but this cRIO running Linux. From the outside, I think it would be possible to provide a GigE for Linux support.  The only devices that seem to favor GigE run Phar Lap ETS.

    Thanks in advance for your kind reply.

    Just to answer he question, the 9068 does not support GigE Vision. Layer MAC Ethernet embedded on the chip of architecting it uses does not meet the requirements of GigE Vision (similar to the old cRIOs VxWorks/PPC).

    The 9068 does support USB3 Vision cameras via its USB 2.0 port well and a lot of GigE Vision cameras have identical models in variants of the USB.

    Eric

  • Prosilica GigE GC750C Camera do not acquire images using software of NOR

    We recently had a camera Prosilica GigE to GC750C. After activating the camera, Jumbo packets is recognized and acquires images with the help of allies Sample Viewer. The camera is also recognized by the NI Vision Assistand and MAX. But trying to acquire images results in the error message attached. I would be very grateful for any help.

    Best regards

    Benjamin

    Operating system: Windows 7, 64 bit

    Firewall disabled; Jumbo packets enabled

    Allied Sample Viewer 1.24

    NEITHER Vision Assistant 2010 (build 20100621052956)

    OR Max 4.7.2

    Benjamin UB says:

    Thank you much for multiple responses.

    The AVT UniCam Version 1.1.3.0 allies and Allied SampleViewer Version 1.24 buy images correctly. This is why I can't imagine that a firewall might be interfering. Also affecting the packet size to 1500 Max only has not solved the problem. Any other ideas?

    Hi Benjamin,

    If you use a software firewall, there are actually quite a few reasons that a piece of software can acquire, but the other may not. Software can set different layers to the network stack and the behavior can be very different. In my view, both software places AVT can reach are either user-mode (in which case the firewall software can easily be configured based by application to let traffic through) or as a network filter driver based on the core (which lies below the firewall, so it is not affected by the latter). If IMAQdx, two locations, it can attach to the network stack are either in kernel mode talk to the TCP/IP stack (above the firewall) or as a driver miniport directly above the hardware and below the firewall (if you have an NI GigE Vision card or one that is compatible with the Driver OR High Performance).

    New versions of the GigE Vision standard has a new feature that make the Protocol more 'user-friendly' firewalls. Our next version of IMAQdx (which I think should be on the web every day now) has support for this new feature. We tested the new AVT cameras and it is supported as well. This should be the firewall issues such less problems.

    Eric

    Eric

  • Connection to CVS GigE camera via a network switch

    It is a fundamental and very simple question!

    I intend to connect two GigE cameras to NI CVS-1458RT for an application of Imaging. When I tested the configuration in MAX, I realized that I can connect the cameras directly to the PoE ports, or alternatively, connect the cameras directly to the network switch and in both cases, connect the CVS to my network via its ethernet port. I was wondering if there is a benefit by connecting directly the VCA cameras, if I do not anticipate supply their Poe or if my switch has PoE Betacam.

    Thank you

    Usually, you always want your cameras on dedicated lines, or at least only sharing bandwidth with other devices. The mechanism of transport used by GigE Vision isn't really sharing good bandwidth with other devices. If you only share the bandwidth on a link given with other devices, you can throttle each take only a percentage of the total bandwidth. If you have devices without camera on the link, they don't usually have a mechanism to control the gap inter-frame limitation insofar as GigE vision made which would be necessary for properly sharing the bandwidth without remove the packages of bandwidth.

    If you end up sharing one of the ports for the operation and configuration of the CVS on the network, you will be at the risk of losing image data packets whenever the rest of the traffic is sent. Although there are mechanisms in place to return data, these add latency and jitter to your purchase.

    Eric

  • Use TM for wifi, connect the ethernet security camera system, that will work, if it does then how the Installer (need instructions, over 65 and not tech saavy)

    I use a time machine / capsule (latest generation) to my wifi. Just purchased a Lorex security for my home that needs to be connected to the internet (via ethernet). Can I plug the ethernet cable into my time machine without affecting my WIFI? Or I need to by a second router to the ethernet connection?

    I need the instructions very simple and complete, over 65 and not tech saavy!

    Currently using Yosemite 10.10.5 (refuse to upgrade to El Captain until they get the bugs worked, I can't handle many problems lol).

    Please help an old lady, so I can't call my son (he is a PC person and does not include Mac people).

    Thank you very much!

    Can I plug the ethernet cable into my time machine without affecting my WIFI?

    Yes, you can use one of the three <-->LAN ports for this.

    Regarding how specifically set up cameras... with very good luck... another user who has the same camera system could see this post and be able to offer help on how to configure things detailed.

    Other users who have created other camera systems may be able to help as well.  But that's where we need your help.  Do you have a link to the configuration Guide or the Setup Guide for your camera system you could provide?

  • Why can't connect using Apple Airport WIFI of my remote security cameras but can connect using the Xfinity WIFI Modem/Router open?

    Why can't connect using Apple Airport WIFI of my remote security cameras but can connect using the Xfinity WIFI Modem/Router open?

    Two possibilities:

    (1) your airport WiFi might have a network name that is not in line with best practices, wireless

    A good wireless network name is...

    ... In short no more than 20 characters

    Simple... no special characters like an apostrophe, dollar sign, asterisk, etc.

    Compact, without spaces in the name

    For example, a wireless network network name as... red .dfedoryk Apple wireless network... .is not what you want. Something like... .dfedorykwireless. .. masse are much more likely to connect to non-Apple devices.

    Same guidelines your password

    (2) Apple gives the same name to network 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz network that produces double router band.  Some non-Apple devices are confused by the present, you may need to use the option to assign a different name for the network of 5 GHz on the router from Apple. Then, 'point' your device to the network name specific to which you want to connect.

  • Why only part of the "basler GIGe scout" cameras are NEITHER taken care of?

    Is the pag web cameras OR update support?

    I do not think that NEITHER can list every single device that is compatible with GigE interface.  It may just be a list of cameras, they have actually tested and checked.  If some of the Basler Scout cameras are listed, I guess all they would work.  I don't know that they all have the same hardware to interface.

    Bruce

  • connect and configure the outputs (VBAI - camera Allied manta)

    Hello

    Currently, one of our projects has an exit. We now want to configure 2 outputs.

    • VBAI 2012
    • Allied camera: Manta G201C
    • Connected with plc

    So far, we used SelectSyncOut and SyncOutPolarity.When, try to use the same approach, we do not get the desired result.

    As an attachment, you see a simple drawing of our cable and exits. According to the provided table I think I need to connect to orange (10) to the (+) of the source. Then green (6) must be connected to the (+) electric user and the (-) (-) user of the power source.

    While we should do the same thing with our second user: connect white/Brown (12) to our user...

    Is this correct?

    Attachment (knipsel), you can see our program. In State 'zwart' we want to define these two our outputs low. "In States 'geen stuk' and ' ok 25" we want to set output 1 high and as 'Afkeur', we want to put the 2 high output.

    Can someone tell me how to proceed? I think I need to use the GPO to SyncOutSource and SyncOutLevels, but when I try this I don't get the results I want.

    With sincere friendships.

    Tom

    Your wiring looks right to me.  Note that if your power user is high impedance (Raffles< 5="" ma),="" you="" may="" need="" a="" shunt="" to="" ground. ="" the="" manual="" has="" the="" appropriate="" resistor="">

    With a quick read of the manual, SyncOutSource (1) the GPO and SyncOutSource (2) value value GPO seem correct.

    The SyncOutLevels must be a switch for outings.  For example, 0x0001 turns on output 1, output 2 and 0 x 0011 how activate 0 x 0010 turn on both.  It's how you used it?

    Activating/Deactivating the polarity will reverse the SyncOutLevel assigned a bit, although you must be able to specify which output that you handle.  Writing a new value to SyncOutLevels looks like the most effective way toggle.

  • Why the host computer is unable to connect to the smart camera on the network?

    My smart camera of NOR-1772 was connected to our network and functioning as a target to a host computer.  The two are running VBAI 2011.  The camera has been moved to another location on the network and another computer is used as the host? The host is connected to the wireless network.  The camera works fine when connected directly to the back of the computer.  Thank you.

    Hi Joel,

    Yes, it makes sense.  I noticed a corellation when I am set up and where I lose the connection.

    Thank you.

    Rob

  • I have my camera, a Kodak M1033, connected to the computer by a usb cable. The connection is not recognized. What I can do.

    My laptop with Windows XP does not connect to the camera?  How can I reconnect these?

    I have my camera, a Kodak M1033, connected to the computer by a usb cable.  The connection is not recognized.  What I can do.

    Install the software from the CD provided with the camera. If no CD not supplied with the camera, you can download Easyshare for XP to Kodak support on kodak.co.uk

  • Internet not connected during the installation of life Cam 3.0

    Original title: when I try to install my new life Cam 3.0

    He says that I am not connected to the internet and try again later. BUT I am connected and tried disabling my firewall, nothing works... Please help me, I'm windows xp2

    Hello

    1. What is the accurate and complete error message that you receive?

    You can try the troubleshooting provided in the links below steps to fix the problem.

    Troubleshoot installation of Intellipoint and IntelliType LifeCam software

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/953691

    Troubleshoot failures to find the new LifeCam hardware

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929087

  • Unable to connect to the camera HP Slate7

    I don't know where to post this, but we are.

    Admins: Please this place to the right place as needed.

    Not too long ago, I got a 7 2800 HP Slate Android tablet. ICS 4.1.1 Android.

    I got less than a month ago to be exact. And now, to my great disappointment, camera of the Tablet does not at all.

    I get just the error message "error: Can not connect to the camera.

    I would like to know what I could do to fix it. I already reset the Tablet through the Android user interface as long as the Hard Reset (hold flight +;) -Flight; Power button for a few seconds) to reset, all to nothing done.

    What could be the next course of action?

    Jocampo wrote:

    Yes, I did everything you said and still nothing.

    Any other ideas?

    Contact HP for warranty repair.

    There is, unfortunately, no other tests that you can perform.

  • Hello I can not connect using the camera Nikon D5 me please

    Hello I can not connect using the camera Nikon D5 me please :)))
    I've heard say that some work and I can not connect! Can someone help me to write on this topic?

    LR supports D5 attach now!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Firefox can not confirm because using the obsolete browser

    Has decided to update/upgrade my browser (IE current, 9). Downloaded Firefox, but cannot confirm my account, I get a "your browser" is obsolete message. I tried to make Firefox my default but it does not work. Should I update first IE? The other prob

  • Designjet 130nr: lines blue horizontal 130nr

    When I try to print a detailed plan of a PDF file, I get the blue horizontal lines or Cyan.

  • = (Y460 idea suddenly stop and only then put it

    I just got my phone yesterday. He was on for about an hour then suddenly the power down. Tried to turn it on again, but it just turned off about 2 seconds after I pressed the power button. =( Any idea?

  • HP solution center application for psc1610xi

    I reinstalled the drivers and software for psc 1610xi but I do not have the app Center ground to operate the scanner of HP laptop. Vista operating system. Scanner works from the button on the device. Down load seems to include the driver and the soft

  • HP Pavilion G6 - Radeon graphics card problem

    Hi all! I have a laptop HP Pavilion G6-2240SH, which has two graphics card. I use the Windows 8.1 operating system The motherboard graphics card works correctly. But there is another hyper-super card: Radeon HD 7600 M I tried to use the official driv