Console port (serial) on Powerconnect 6248 switch
Hi all
I have two powerconnect 6248 s. The first I've had for several months. The second, I just ordered recently.
I can't go to the console in to the second switch. I use the same settings (minicom) and cable that I use regularly to connect to the first switch.
Any thoughts on how to solve this problem? I don't see any startup dialog after resetting the switch 2.
Thank you
Looks like you have experienced just about everything that you can. You checked restarted cable, the emulator settings, confirmed working on the other switch, switch, and the default value and it still does not work. It sounds more like it could be a hardware problem with this port. Is the unit still under warranty?
Tags: Dell Switches
Similar Questions
-
My PowerConnect 6248 switch loses its settings when disconnected from the power
Hello
I'll put up a PowerConnect 6248 switch on my local network through Web interface (I can't use serial to do).
I put the IP, login, password, a LAG, SNTP server address, etc.
It works fine until I unplugged the power cord to the switch to simulate a power outage. When I plugged in the power cord, the switch will reboot by displaying its default settings and I release all of mine.
Y at - it a specific command, I missed to save all my settings in the switch?
Thank you for your help.
Pascal.
The switch has two separate configuration locations, a running configuration and startup configuration. This allows you to change configuration and test running before engaging them in the startup configuration. Once you have the running configuration, how you want it, you need to run the # copy running-config startup-config command, or just copy # run start.
See you soon
-
Blocking MAC address on PowerConnect 6248 switch
Hello
I have a PowerConnect 6248 switch where we want to block a specific MAC address from the rest of the network.
I created a list of MAC access with the following commands:
Console (config) #mac access-list extended BLOCK
Console (config-mac-access-list) #deny 001D.09D4.B08E ffff.ffff.ffff allConsole (config-mac-access-list) #permit a whole
I then apply it to all interfaces:
console (config) #mac group-access BLOCK
What ends by goes, is that all hosts connected to the switch are blocked when my rule should only be blocking the host with mac address 001D.09D4.B08E.
What I am doing wrong?
Thank you!
Have you tried changing your statement to:
Console (config-mac-access-list) #deny 001D.09D4.B08E 0000.0000.0000 everything
-
I have a stack of 7 6248 switches. I added an 8th battery ok but I can get it configured like the rest.
It just says: its on Default VLAN 1
I have 3 VLAN 1.22 and 201. All ports show deafault VLAB but only switches 1-7 in the VLAN 22 and 201.
How can I copy the config info to go to 8?
1 default ch3-48,
3/3/xg3-xg4.
4/4/xg3-xg4.
5/5/xg3-xg4.
6/6/xg3-xg4.
7/7/xg3-xg4.
8/8/g2-g30.
8/8/g32-g48.
8/8/xg3-xg4
22 c 1-2,
1/1-g3/g48.
1/1/xg3-xg4.
2/2-g1/g48.
3/g1-3/g48.
4/4-g1/g48.
5/5/g1-g48.
6/6/g1-g48.
7/g1-7/g48
201 c 1-2,
1/1/xg3-xg4.
2/2-g1/g48.
3/g48
5/g1-5/g48
1/1-g1/g2.
1/1/xg3-xg4.
3/g48, 5/g48
If all ports are going to have the same configuration, you can configure them at the same time.
Console (config) # interface range ethernet 8/8-g1/g48
See you soon
-
Errors of battery port (PowerConnect 6248 switch)
Please see the logs below. What is that saying? The question is on the network or physical problem on the cable/port?
Log buffer:
Errors detected on the Port of pile 1/xg1 (oldRxErrors = 3001 = currentRxErrors 3003 oldTxErrors = 0 currentTxErrors = 0). Use BRCM_escape_apos; See the battery-port diagBRCM_escape_apos; Watch detailed statistics.
See the battery port diag:
1 - xg1:
RBYT:3e5cfaaa RPKT:9a4ba4b TBYT:e4c25325 TPKT:7d81423d
RFCs:BC0 RFRG:0 RJBR:0 RUND:0 ROVR:0
TFCS:0 TERR. : 01 - xg2:
RBYT:c2277bb1 RPKT:6b2c0473 TBYT:ea7e75d3 TPKT:4b0cf8ae
RFCS:0 RFRG:0 RJBR:0 RUND:0 ROVR:0
TFCS:0 TERR. : 02 - xg1:
RBYT:32f4ae8 RPKT:17590db0 TBYT:dcc05da9 TPKT:330ea6d7
RFCS:1 RFRG:0 RJBR:0 RUND:0 ROVR:0
-Other - or ITU (q)
TFCS:0 TERR. : 02 - xg2:
RBYT:1e243193 RPKT:7ca8563e TBYT:dce26ec1 TPKT:4bb4d53
RFCS:15 RFRG:0 RJBR:0 RUND:0 ROVR:0
TFCS:0 TERR. : 03 - xg1:
RBYT:670d9fbf RPKT:8553d2af TBYT:82112954 TPKT:b6b0d342
RFCS:0 RFRG:0 RJBR:0 RUND:0 ROVR:0
TFCS:0 TERR. : 03 - xg2:
RBYT:fae703cb RPKT:d9fe988e TBYT:79ddb35 TPKT:b0647900
RFCS:0 RFRG:0 RJBR:0 RUND:0 ROVR:0
TFCS:0 TERR. : 04 - xg1:
RBYT:25865503 RPKT:4f3df21b TBYT:27359088 TPKT:6e8f38a5
RFCS:0 RFRG:0 RJBR:0 RUND:0 ROVR:0
TFCS:0 TERR. : 04 - xg2:
-Other - or ITU (q)
RBYT:8210be41 RPKT:b6b0d2dc TBYT:670cbb4d TPKT:8553d1cd
RFCS:0 RFRG:0 RJBR:0 RUND:0 ROVR:0
TFCS:0 TERR. : 0Thank you
Ok. Finally I found the downtime. We had to add a new switch of the battery.
I took 1/xg1 cable and put it in the 4\xg1 port to connect to the new switch.
Also updated to the latest firmware.
Result:
-There was no errors for 2 the first 2 days.
-first 8 mistakes happened today on port 4/xg1
------------TX-------------- ------------RX--------------
Data error data error
Rate rate rate rate Total
Interface Unit (MB/s) (errors/s) errors (MB/s) (errors/s) errors
---- ---------------- ------ ---------- ---------- ------ ---------- ----------
1 xg1 554 0 0 288 0 0
1 xg2 820 0 0 972 0 0
1 xg3 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 xg4 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 xg1 428 0 0 298 0 0
2 xg2 291 0 0 549 0 0
2 xg3 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 xg4 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 xg1 53 0 0 17 0 0
3 xg2 295 0 0 435 0 0
3 xg3 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 xg4 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 xg1 971 0 0 821 0 8
4 xg2 18 0 0 52 0 0
4 xg3 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 xg4 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 xg1 973 0 0 818 0 0
5 xg2 818 0 0 973 0 0
------------TX-------------- ------------RX--------------
Data error data error
Rate rate rate rate Total
Interface Unit (MB/s) (errors/s) errors (MB/s) (errors/s) errors
---- ---------------- ------ ---------- ---------- ------ ---------- ----------
5 xg3 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 xg4 0 0 0 0 0 0
It's the fault of physical cable. I have to replace the cable.
Thank you all for help in the investigation.
-
PowerConnect 6248 switch for Cisco router
Hello
I'm new to this forum and I have a problem at the moment between a Cisco router and a dell pc6248. The problem is that I lost conectivity in VLAN 1 when I connect the router to a trunk port in the switch, however I conectivity VLAN 2 through this link to trunk. The configuration of the switch:
interface ethernet 1/g48
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 1-2
output
interface ethernet 1/g43
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 2
output
On router
fast interface 0/1
no ip address
no downtime
fast interface 0/1.1
encapsulation dot1q 1 native
IP 192.200.3.1 255.255.255.0
fast interface 0/1.2
encapsulation dot1q 2
IP 192.168.51.33 255.255.255.248
output
With the above configuration, I lost conectivity with the host in the vlan 1 - 192.200.3.x/24, but I win conectivity VLAN 2, when I connect the router to the 48 trunk port in the switch. This means that the trunk link for VLAN 2 work but not for VLAN 1.
I read on the port of general mode, where I can configure the pvid of the port as 1 (vlan1) and it would be the unttag VLAN (even natively in Cisco), and I can configure the VLAN 2 like the tag, all this in the same port. What do you think about this? Someone have set up something like that?
Best regards
Erasmo
PD: I write from Chile, I apologize for my English.
I agree with you, I would try the general mode on the PowerConnect switch.
mode console # switchport general
Console # switchport General allowed vlan add 2 tag
Console # switchport pvid General 1
Keep us updated.
-
The PowerConnect 6248 switch, RAY and selected methodological issues
I think this should be simple enough, but doesn't work that way. I have multiple 6248 and a handful of other switches in PC and I'm RADIUS deployment as primary authentication mechanism. I'm going through some preliminary tests here and a simple thing is not just to work this way. Profile networklist I put RAY first of all that the method of selection and LOCAL for the second. The RADIUS user authenticates very well, but while trying to search the LOCAL user, it is rejected. I thought that if the local user is not found by DEPARTMENT policy, he is sent to the next method? I'm only using telnet for the moment method before changing the HTTP methods. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you!
Could answer my own question here, but I think that the NPS server should probably 'time' or not meet the demand of the initial authentication for the local aspect until you reach? have not tested, but may do so shortly.
-
N2048 vs PowerConnect 6248 switch
Hello
I would like to ask the professional.
For the communication of internal servers of our company, what to spend more powerful N2048 or PC6248?
We would like to use only ports of the team, LAG. No VLAN, no routing. Just "layer 2".
Thank you.
Best regards
MAxim Krol
Hi, Maxim,.
If you do not give me layer 2 the N2000 is the newer model. It has several CPU memory 1 GB vs. 256 MB and increased capacity of fabric and a faster transfer rate.
http://www.Dell.com/us/business/p/networking-N2000-Series/PD
http://www.Dell.com/us/business/p/PowerConnect-6200-series/PD
-
Adding a new Powerconnect 6248 switch to battery of existing production
A happy user PowerConnect here. I was wondering what were the experiences of others when you add an additional switch to an existing fireplace. My stack of 4 switches Powerconnect run happily on my side LAN and add a 5th to the stack. Any thoughts?
Here is a good article that deals with stacking Dell PowerConnect 6200 Series Switches. Page 13, adding a member of the battery with minimal Interruption
www.Dell.com/.../pwcnt_stacking_switches.pdf
Hope this helps,
-
PowerConnect 6248 stacking using the front SFP Ports
I am trying to stack two Dell Powerconnect 6248 switches. Currently they are chained together, but I modules fibre for the front sfp ports. Theoretically, I should be able to stack them. But when I try:
stack 1/g45 #stack - port console (config-battery)
Could not set the front panel stacking mode.
Any ideas? Thank you!
The PCT6200 requires a stack of modules installed in Bay 1 (XG1 XG2) at the rear of the switch. The stacking module uses CX4/Infiniband type stacking spacers.
Stacking of front port / user is not supported
-
Dell PowerConnect 6248 10 GB ports reference works do not
Hello
We have recently installed a module SFP + (part # c107d) in our Dell PowerConnect 6248 switch. The switch does not seem to see the module because before install us the plug-in, it showed a port xg3 xg4, and after the addition of the module, it shows that these ports.
So I have a few questions:
Is the SFP + above compatible with this model of switch?
If so, how can verify us that the ports are active?
Here is the result of the port details:
#show interface ethernet 1/xg3 in detail
Port Type Duplex speed Neg Admin link
A State
----- ------------------------------ ------ ------- ---- ----- -----
1/xg3 10G - level s/o unknown Auto Up Down
Port description
---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/xg3
Flow control: enabled
Port: 1/xg3
Belonging to a VLAN: access mode Mode
Operating parameters:
PVID: 1
Capture filtering: enabled
Acceptable frame type: no label
Default priority: 0
GVRP status: Disabled
Protected: disabled
-Other - or ITU (q)
Port 1/xg3 is a member of:
Rule of VLAN name evacuation Type
---- --------------------------------- ----------- --------
1 by default not marked by default
Static configuration:
PVID: 1
Capture filtering: enabled
Acceptable frame type: no label
Port 1/xg3 is configured statically:
Output name rule of VLAN
---- --------------------------------- -----------
Prohibition of VLAN:
Name of VLAN
---- ---------------------------------
Port 1/xg3 Enabled
Status: Disabled role: disabled
-Other - or ITU (q)
Identification of the port: 128.51 shipping cost: 0
Fast port: No. (configured: no) root Protection: No.
Designated the bridge priority: 32768 address: 80:00:00:25:64:19:92:1 C
Identification of the designated port: 0.0 cost of access road designated: 0
Root regional CSE: 80:00:00:25:64:19:92:1 C CSE Port cost: 0
BPDU: 0 sent, received 0
Yes, this module is listed as compatible with the switch. It seems that you install in Bay 2? He may have listed these ports but they probably do not appear as active. Have you tried to make a connection with ports?
-
PowerConnect 6248 routing problem
Hi all
I have a very frustrating problem with routing using a PowerConnect 6248 switch.
Network configuration is the following:
VLAN3
172.16.0.254/24
VLAN4
192.168.0.254/24
PC on each VLAN using the switch VLAN interface IP (x.x.x.254) as the gateways.
Switch has configured default route to 192.168.0.248 which is a router with excess of 100 subnets frame relay cloud. 192.168.0.248 has routes suitable for all remote subnets via a serial interface, a static route to VLAN 3 (172.16.0.0/24) traffic through 192.168.0.254 and one way by default via a PIX 515 (192.168.0.253). Router and PIX is connected to access VIRTUAL 4 LAN ports. The PIX has a route to VLAN 3 traffic through 192.168.0.254.
The problem is that VIRTUAL 3 all hosts on the local network cannot access the Internet. They can ping the gateways in the order - 172.16.0.254, 192.168.0.248 and 192.168.0.253. I have disabled IP forwarding on the router and the switch with no effect.
I built this configuration in Cisco Packet Tracer 5.0 (it works) and we are running exactly the same IP configuration with a Nortel switch instead of the Dell 6248 (this also works).
Absoloutely perplexed to find out what I'm missing! I also noticed that if I perform a traceback while in the CLI on the router using a source IP address of the interface VLAN that it blocks the interface on the switch.
I would be very grateful to anyone who can punch me in the right direction.
I've included the config switch below.
Configure
database of VLAN
VLAN 2-4
subnet of VLAN association 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0 3
subnet of VLAN association 192.168.11.0 255.255.255.0 2
subnet of VLAN association 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 4
output
battery
1 2 Member
output
IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
no console logging
no ip redirection
IP routing
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.248
bootpdhcprelay enable
bootpdhcprelay IP_serveur 192.168.0.3
router RIP
no activation
output
interface vlan 2
name of the "voice."
Routing
IP 192.168.11.254 255.255.255.0
output
interface vlan 3
name "workstations".
Routing
IP 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0
output
interface vlan 4
"Name servers".
Routing
IP 192.168.0.254 255.255.255.0
output
level of 3c9fd59f1a240ff455a9d9e8eebae936 user name 'admin' password encrypted 15
router ospf
no activation
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g2
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g3
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g4
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g5
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g6
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g7
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g8
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g9
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g10
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g11
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g12
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g13
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g14
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g15
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g16
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g17
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g18
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g19
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g20
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g21
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g22
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g23
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g24
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g25
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g26
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g27
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g28
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g29
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g30
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g31
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g32
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g33
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g34
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g35
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g36
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g37
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g38
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g39
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g40
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g41
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g42
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g43
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g44
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g45
switchport access vlan 4
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g46
switchport access vlan 4
output
output
-
Incoming packets were discarded on Dell 6248 switch
Hello guys,.
I'm having a problem on my network. From time to time the icmp echo packets are lost and this causes our monitoring system trigger false alarms.
I checked interfaces for switches and found the discarded packet counter is incremented in one of them.
Flow control is enabled on the interface and there is no frame break sent.
The duplex on both ends are correct are the port speeds.
The firmware of the switch is 3.3.9.1 and the model is a PowerConnect 6248 switch.view statistics ethernet 1/g48
Total packets received (bytes)... 2019770477
Packets received 64 bytes... 945800
Packets received from 65 to 127 bytes. 1105872
Packets received from 128 to 255 bytes... 152970
Packets received 256-511 bytes... 445738
Packets received 512-1023 bytes... 155436
Packets received 1024-1518 bytes... 414040
Packets received > 1518 bytes... 634118
64 bytes of RX and TX packets... 946019
RX and TX 65-127 bytes packet... 3294655
Packet RX and TX 128 to 255 bytes... 235082
RX and TX 256-511 byte packets... 893732
RX and TX 512-1023 byte packets... 311408
RX and TX 1024-1518 byte packets... 436671
RX and TX 1519-2047 bytes packets... 873826
RX and TX 2048-4095 bytes packets... 0
RX and TX-9216 4096 bytes packets... 0Total packets received without errors... 3853974
Unicast packets received... 3421088
Received multicast packets... 211575
Received broadcast packets... 221311
-Other - or ITU (q)
Receive packets ignored... 506Total packets received with errors of MAC... 0
Jabbers received... 0
Fragments / sousdimensionnés has received... 0
Alignment defects... 0
FCS Errors..................................... 0
Overruns....................................... 0
802. 3 x Pause frames received... 0
Unacceptable frame type... 0Total of transmitted packets (bytes)... 858789293
64 byte packets transmitted... 219
65-127 bytes transmitted packets... 2188783
Packets transmitted 128 to 255 bytes... 82112
256-511 bytes transmitted packets... 447994
512-1023 bytes transmitted packets... 155972
1024-1518 bytes transmitted packets... 22631
Transmitted packets > 1518 bytes... 239708
Size of the image of max... 1518Total packets transmitted successfully... 3137419
Transmitted unicast packets... 3034928
-Other - or ITU (q)
Multicast packets transmitted. 1628
Broadcast packets transmitted. 100863
Transmit packets ignored... 0Total transmit packets ignored... 0
Single Collision frames... 0
Several images of Collision... 0
Excessive Collision management... 0802. 3 x Pause frames transmitted... 0
GVRP PDU received... 0
GVRP PDUs of transmitted... 0
GVRP failure records... 0
BPDU: 0 sent, received 0EAPOL frames transmitted... 0
EAPOL Start received frames... 0Thanks in advance.
Humm,
We have changed our duo of remote of a failure wan link and the interface mistakes of count stop. Everything is the same: traffic, applications, etc. Not a clue about what happened because there is a Linux between the equipment of the carrier and the switch (bad packets would have fallen in the interface of linux machine).
We turn now to the carrier of the explanations/solutions.
Thank you for your time!
-
PowerConnect 6248 - Crossover (MDIX) Configuration
Is it possible to configure a single port with the PowerConnect 6248 MDIX switch? I can't find any reference in the manual of the CLI.
The switch is automatically, no manual setting.
Page 25 of the user guide:
Support auto-MDI/MDIX
The switch supports automatic detection between the direct and cross cables.
Media-Dependent Interface (MDI) is the standard wiring for terminal stations and standard for wiring
hubs and switches is known as Media - Dependent Interface with Crossover (MDIX).
http://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_networking/esuprt_net_fxd_prt_swtchs/PowerConnect-6224_User%27s%20Guide_en-us.PDF
See you soon
-
Latest Firmware for 6248 switch
I want to ask you what is the latest firmware available for 6248 switch.
I 3.3.14.2, the last?
Thank you
It is the most recent. It just came out in December according to support.dell.com: www.dell.com/.../DriversDetails; Starts = 3504032857 & osCode = NAA & productCode = powerconnect 6248 switch & languageCode = EN & categoryId = NOR
B
Maybe you are looking for
-
Thunderbird is not updated in the ubuntu repository
Hello Thunderbird 38 is not yet in the repository Ubuntu 15.04? Thank you
-
New download of Firefox browser, HOW to search?
I just downloaded firefox browser, but I do not understand how to enter web addresses to look up, as there is no a search bar, at the top, as in other browsers.I said I don't want firefox as my default browser, because I already have Google Chrome an
-
Presario cq62: System disable the code 51281743
model: co62-219wm shows system disable 51281743 pls help! thnks
-
Run the sequence TestStand silently in c# with report
Hello I use TestStand 2012 SP1 and Visual Studio 2010. I want to run a TestStand sequence silently in my c# software. I saw on this web site, how to run a TestStand sequence (https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-29585). This example is really inte
-
Architecture feature producer consumer
I was wondering if the loop of consumer in a producer consumer architecture works only when the loop of producer send him something, or he still works, even if it receives nothing from the loop of the producer?