CUCM and UCCX version compatibility

Hello

We are re-hosting UCCX to vmware with CUCM 9.x version 8.5.1

CUCM and UCCX both will be on VMware.

Someone let me know what CUCM 9.x supports UCCX 8.5.1base.

We have only UCCX 8.5.1base DVD version for installation. I'm looking for the compatible version of 9.x CUCM to install.

Pls let me know the CUCM 9.x compatible with version 8.5.1base UCCX

Rgds

Rajesh Kumar

Hi Renon,

This info is on Page 40 of the attached guide;

Software and hardware compatibility for Cisco Unified Contact Guide

Center Express and Cisco Unified IP IVR

http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/CRS/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.PDF

See you soon!

Rob

"May your heart always be joyful".
And your song may always be sung
Can remain you forever young. "

-Dylan

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

APEX and DB version compatibility
Will be the last version to work APEX in a 10.2.0.4 database?

All development has been 11.2.0.2. We recently learned our schedule so for a production that is still on 10.2.0.4 pushed and we wonder if that should be a matter of concern.

Thank you

-Joe
Yes, Apex 4.1 will run on a 10.2.0.4 db.

If you're fine as long as you have not used anything 11g specific in your pl/sql code.

cs6 and cc version compatibility

I was wondering if anyone can help as I go and autour on the adobe site trying to work this out and my patience is wearing thin.
I am the owner of a small company with two complete workstations using Design Premium 5.5
I just bought a third workstation that will be busy some days a week and was originally thinking that I would upgrade to cs6 on both machines and buying a cs6 new edition for the third work station. Until yesterday's announcement of the development of the subscription, it is.
I'm not terribly interested in crossing of subscription for two work stations which currently have 5.5 on them, especially because it was a great investment to buy a legitimate copy of the software in the beginning and continue to be upgraded over the years. It seems such a waste of money.
So I thought, if I had to put in place the new workstation on the subscription (it seems inevitable that we are pushed in that direction), my files from the upgraded cs6 workstations would be compatible with CC, or is there work issues in both directions between the two?
However, it seems that adobe has supported me in a corner. Initially investment of $2850 to have all workstations running the cs6 seemed like a good idea, but with the announcement of the subscription yesterday I'm not sure if I would be throwing money down the drain, so to speak. Both versions are compatible? I'm just better to throw my premium 5.5 design perfectly fine editions and start from scratch with the subscription?
Thanks for any idea or help, you can offer.
- As of this moment (with Creative Cloud CS6 apps running) most of your files are compatible, but all cloud only features that change the contents of the file don't are of course not supported in the version under license.
- When the new version (CC) ships, only some of the applications will include support to save files in formats compatible CS6. CS6 will officially become a legacy at this time that version.

9.1 CUCM and 8.5 CUPS compatible?

Hello

made the CUPS 8.5 is compatible with the CUCM9.x?

We plan to upgrade a CUCM8.6 to 9.1. But do not want to upgrade the CUPS8.5.

the CUP8.5 will work with CUCM 9.x?

I have not seen any document on the compatibility matrix, that's why I sent this message here.

Kind regards

Antra

No, the major and minor version must match, you MUST upgrade to IM & P 9.1.

From 9.x, CUCM and IM & P versions must be aligned to the x.y level.

mIVR in UCCX version 7.0.1

Is it possible to collect newspapers UCCX version 7.0.1 mIVR?

In fact, I want to know the numbers that the customer presses the after trigger

Please help me.

Thank you in advance.

RDP on the UCCX server and search for the MIVR connects under location:

C:\Program Files\wfavvid\log\MIVR

Concerning

Deepak

Server of the UCS for retransmission of CUCM/UnityCnx/UCCX cause

I installed CUCM, UnityCnx and UCCX using VMware 4.1 on a server C210M UCS. I thought that the web interface has been a bit slower to change between menus than we have on a physical server, but do not think it was too bad. The real problem was found when I tried to upgrade the 3 comments UC systems. I see the continuous transmissions between the SFTP server and servers CUCM, UnityCnx and UCCX. It takes a long time to upgrade systems because of the broadcast. Anyone else see this issue?

Not specific broadcasts, no.. But they are just an indicator of another problem somewhere. Don't know what you have, never saw your environment, don't know you from Adam. But if you are running 4.1 with comments of the CPU, then you must be aware of the TCP LRO problem if you're not already. LRO is enabled by default and it is fixed now with a new patch, but in 4.1 before the hotfix will stop the vast "TCP" usually in the form of poor performace TCP as a general statement. This may cause retransmissions among many other things of course. Here is the link to turn off RSO on our guests and to restore back to normal TCP transmissions, will it affect you in the first place. You mention that you fixed LRO known issue before indicating a tcp problem, so I'll post it on the assumption that you specifically called a tcp-based protocol and no udp based.

Good luck, let me know if she takes care of it.

http://docwiki.Cisco.com/wiki/Disable_LRO

IPS 6.1 and ASA / versions ASDM

I've upgraded to the latest version 6.1 for my IPS module, but now I can't get the IPS via the ASDM or IME config. I can however at the CLI. I have to upgrade my ASDM on the ASA, ASA, or both? I have included a copy of the IME of logs. I also have the IPS through the IDM. My version of the SAA is 7.1 (2) and the ASDM 5.1 (2). Any help would be apperciated.

Hello

Please see the ASA and IPS software compatibility matrix in the URL below.

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/compatibility/asamatrx.html

concerning

Ashok

WCS & WLC version compatibility

Are there compatibility issues between the 7.0.164.0 of the WCS and WLC version 7.0.116.0 version?

Hi Jason,

Table 1-WCS Versions

WCS version	Controller supported versions	Rental Server Versions supported	Versions supported for MSE	Release date	Upgrade took in charge of	Operating system requirement
7.0.172.0	7.0.116.0 7.0.98.218 7.0.98.0 6.0.202.0 6.0.199.4 6.0.196.0 6.0.188.0 6.0.182.0 6.0.108.0 5.2.193.0 5.2.178.0 5.2.157.0 4.2.209.0 4.2.207.0 4.2.205.0 4.2.176.0 4.2.173.0 4.2.130.0 4.2.112.0 4.2.99.0 4.2.61.0	6.0.202.0	7.0.201.0	April 2011	7.0.164.3 7.0.164.0 6.0.202.0 6.0.196.0 6.0.181.0 6.0.170.0 6.0.132.0 5.2.148.0 5.2.130.0 5.2.125.0 5.2.110.0	Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit RHEL 5.x Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above No support for 64-bit
7.0.164.3	7.0.98.0 6.0.202.0 6.0.199.4 6.0.196.0 6.0.188.0 6.0.182.0 6.0.108.0 5.2.193.0 5.2.178.0 5.2.157.0 4.2.209.0 4.2.207.0 4.2.205.0 4.2.176.0 4.2.173.0 4.2.130.0 4.2.112.0 4.2.99.0 4.2.61.0	6.0.103.0	7.0.105.0	December 2010	7.0.164.0 6.0.196.0 6.0.181.0 6.0.170.0 6.0.132.0 5.2.148.0 5.2.130.0 5.2.125.0 5.2.110.0	Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit RHEL 5.x Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above No support for 64-bit
7.0.164.0	7.0.98.0 6.0.202.0 6.0.199.4 6.0.196.0 6.0.188.0 6.0.182.0 6.0.108.0 5.2.193.0 5.2.178.0 5.2.157.0 4.2.209.0 4.2.207.0 4.2.205.0 4.2.176.0 4.2.173.0 4.2.130.0 4.2.112.0 4.2.99.0 4.2.61.0	6.0.103.0	7.0.105.0	June 2010	6.0.181.0 6.0.170.0 6.0.132.0 5.2.148.0 5.2.130.0 5.2.125.0 5.2.110.0	Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit RHEL 5.x Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above No support for 64-bit
6.0.202.0	6.0.202.0 6.0.199.4 6.0.199.0 (taken from EAC) 6.0.196.0 6.0.188.0 6.0.182.0 6.0.108.0

5.2.193.0
5.2.178.0
5.2.157.0
5.1.163.0
5.1.151.0
4.2.209.0
4.2.207.0
4.2.205.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

6.0.202.0

April 2011

6.0.196.0
6.0.181.0
6.0.170.0
6.0.132.0
5.2.148.0
5.2.130.0
5.2.125.0
5.2.110.0
5.1.65.4
5.1.64.0
4.2.128.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

6.0.196.0

6.0.199.4
6.0.199.0 (taken from EAC)
6.0.196.0
6.0.188.0
6.0.182.0
6.0.108.0
5.2.193.0
5.2.178.0
5.2.157.0
5.1.163.0
5.1.151.0
4.2.209.0
4.2.207.0
4.2.205.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

6.0.102.0

6.0.105.0

July 15, 2010

6.0.181.0
6.0.170.0
6.0.132.0
5.2.148.0
5.2.130.0
5.2.125.0
5.2.110.0
5.1.65.4
5.1.64.0
4.2.128.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

6.0.181.0

6.0.196.0
6.0.188.0
6.0.182.0
6.0.108.0
5.2.193.0
5.2.178.0
5.2.157.0
5.1.163.0
5.1.151.0
4.2.207.0
4.2.205.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

6.0.101.0

6.0.103.0

February 17, 2010

6.0.170.0
6.0.132.0
5.2.148.0
5.2.130.0
5.2.125.0
5.2.110.0
5.1.65.4
5.1.64.0
4.2.128.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

6.0.170.0

6.0.188.0
6.0.182.0
6.0.108.0
5.2.193.0
5.2.178.0
5.2.157.0
5.1.163.0
5.1.151.0
4.2.207.0
4.2.205.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

6.0.97.0

November 8, 2009

6.0.132.0
5.2.148.0
5.2.130.0
5.2.125.0
5.2.110.0
5.1.65.4
5.1.64.0
4.2.128.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

6.0.132.0

6.0.182.0
6.0.108.0
5.2.178.0
5.2.157.0
5.1.163.0
5.1.151.0
4.2.205.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

6.0.85.0

June 11, 2009

5.2.130.0
5.2.125.0
5.2.110.0
5.1.65.4
5.1.64.0
4.2.128.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.2.148.0

5.2.193.0
5.2.178.0
5.2.157.0
5.1.151.0
5.0.148.2
5.0.148.0
4.2.207.0
4.2.205.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

5.2.100.0

June 25, 2009

5.2.130.0
5.2.125.0
5.2.110.0
5.1.65.4
5.1.64.0
5.0.72.0
5.0.56.2
5.0.56.0
4.2.128.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.2.130.0

5.2.178.0
5.2.157.0
5.1.151.0
5.0.148.2
5.0.148.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

5.2.91.0

February 21, 2009

5.2.125.0
5.2.110.0
5.1.65.4
5.1.64.0
5.0.72.0
5.0.56.2
5.0.56.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.2.125.0

5.2.178.0
5.2.157.0
5.1.151.0
5.0.148.2
5.0.148.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

5.2.91.0

February 10, 2009

5.2.110.0
5.1.65.4
5.1.64.0
5.0.72.0
5.0.56.2
5.0.56.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.2.110.0

5.2.157.0
5.1.151.0
5.0.148.2
5.0.148.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

5.2.91.0

November 24, 2008

5.1.64.0
5.0.72.0
5.0.56.2
5.0.56.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.1

RHEL 5.0

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.1.65.4

5.1.163.0
5.1.151.0
5.0.148.2
5.0.148.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

5.1.35.0

January 9, 2009

5.1.64.0
5.0.72.0
5.0.56.2
5.0.56.0
4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.x

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.1.64.0

5.1.151.0
5.0.148.2
5.0.148.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.173.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0

5.1.30.0

July 21, 2008

5.0.56.2
5.0.56.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.1

RHEL 5.0

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.0.72.0

5.0.148.2
5.0.148.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0
4.1.185.0
4.1.171.0

4.0.38.0

Does not apply

August 5, 2008

5.0.56.2
5.0.56.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0
4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.1

RHEL 5.0

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.0.56.2

5.0.148.0
4.2.61.0
4.1.x.x

4.0.33.0

Does not apply

April 14, 2008

5.0.56.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0
4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.0

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

5.0.56.0

5.0.148.0
4.2.61.0
4.1.x.x

4.0.32.0

Does not apply

February 16, 2008

4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0
4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 5.0

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

4.2.128.0

4.2.207.0
4.2.205.0
4.2.176.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0
4.1.185.0
4.1.171.0
4.0.216.0
4.0.206.0
4.0.179.11
4.0.179.8
4.0.155.0

3.1.43.0

Does not apply

May 13, 2009

4.2.110.0
4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0
4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0
4.0.100.0
4.0.97.0
4.0.96.0
4.0.87.0
4.0.81.0
4.0.66.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 4.0

RHEL 5.0 (No. 5.1 and later supported)

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

4.2.110.0

4.2.176.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0
4.1.185.0
4.1.171.0
4.0.216.0
4.0.206.0
4.0.179.11
4.0.179.8
4.0.155.0

3.1.42.0

Does not apply

29 sep 2008

4.2.97.0
4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0
4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0
4.0.100.0
4.0.97.0
4.0.96.0
4.0.87.0
4.0.81.0
4.0.66.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 4.0

RHEL 5.0

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

4.2.97.0

4.2.176.0
4.2.130.0
4.2.112.0
4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0
4.1.185.0
4.1.171.0
4.0.216.0
4.0.206.0
4.0.179.11
4.0.179.8
4.0.155.0

3.1.38.0

Does not apply

June 3, 2008

4.2.81.0
4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0
4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0
4.0.100.0
4.0.97.0
4.0.96.0
4.0.87.0
4.0.81.0
4.0.66.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 4.0

RHEL 5.0

Windows/RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

4.2.81.0

4.2.99.0
4.2.61.0
4.1.185.0
4.1.171.0
4.0.216.0
4.0.206.0
4.0.179.11
4.0.179.8
4.0.155.0

3.1.36.0

Does not apply

March 17, 2008

4.2.62.11
4.2.62.0
4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0
4.0.100.0
4.0.97.0
4.0.96.0
4.0.87.0
4.0.81.0
4.0.66.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 4.0

RHEL 5.0

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

4.2.62.11

4.2.61.0
4.1.185.0
4.1.171.0
4.0.216.0
4.0.206.0
4.0.179.11
4.0.179.8
4.0.155.0

3.1.35.0

Does not apply

January 25, 2008

4.2.62.0
4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0
4.0.100.0
4.0.97.0
4.0.96.0
4.0.87.0
4.0.81.0
4.0.66.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 4.0 update 5

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

4.2.62.0

4.2.61.0
4.1.185.0
4.1.171.0
4.0.216.0
4.0.206.0
4.0.179.11
4.0.179.8
4.0.155.0

3.1.35.0

Does not apply

November 9, 2007

4.1.91.0
4.1.83.0
4.0.100.0
4.0.97.0
4.0.96.0
4.0.87.0
4.0.81.0
4.0.66.0

Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit

RHEL 4.0 update 5

Windows / RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above

No support for 64-bit

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/wireless/WCS/release/notes/WCS_RN7_0_172.html

See you soon!

Rob

PS: + 5 to my friend Leo with the invisible stars

Question about commissioning of the E20s - CUCM and TMS

If we now run software CUCM 8.6.2 and 4.1 E20. I played with CUCM and TMS supply by and a few questions.

It seems that there are some features that can be set via the TMS models that cannot be resolved via CUCM (MTU, custom, etc commands). Is it possible to apply these settings through TMS while having the unit registered in CUCM?

Essentially, I want my call recording platform CUCM and control, but want to keep the granularity that TMS offers in terms of commissioning etc.. I expect the same problems with C-series, etc.

Am I right in saying that, in order to get the E20 to join CUCM, I need to define the external Manager to "CUCM", and thus eliminate any possibility of TMS to manage? Otherwise, what is I could have managed by TMS and then set the SIP of the E20 to point to CUCM via templates in TMS?

Any tips on that?

Hello

Having both TMS and CUCM to manage endpoints is not a good idea (yet). TMS and CUCM will return to each of the other toes with unpredictable results.

With TMS 13.2, I understand that you should be able to import the CUCM in TMS and then find all systems registered to it and import these into TMS, however in this case TMS plan only systems conferences and will manage them not active (you can see status of the call as well). 13.2 TMS is not yet released, so that's what I said must be in this version.

So basically now if you use CUCM, use CUCM provisioning and don't use TMS. We focus on interactions with systems registered with CUCM TMS and it will be more developed on this in the future. I recommend you check out the TMS13.2 release notes released to see if it is mentioned.

Thank you

can't make an external call with CuCM and H323 gateway

Hi experts, I have a problem with CuCM and h323 Gateway. I use a 2811 router to make a gateway H323, CuCM server and Switch layer 2 build a VoIP LAB, this my network:

and my router configuration:

Current configuration: 2335 bytes

!

version 12.4

horodateurs service debug datetime msec

Log service timestamps datetime msec

no password encryption service

!

router host name

!

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

!

forest-meter operation of syslog messages

!

No aaa new-model

!

!

!

dot11 syslog

IP source-route

!

!

IP cef

DHCP excluded-address 192.168.1.1 IP 192.168.1.10

!

IP VOICE dhcp pool

network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

option 150 ip 192.168.1.2

default router 192.168.1.1

!

!

No ipv6 cef

!

Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

!

!

voip phone service

h323 connections allow h323

allow connections h323 to SIP

allow connections sip h323

allow sip to sip connections

service additional h450.12

Fax protocol cisco

!

!

!

vocal h323 class 1

H225 timeout tcp establish 3

!

!

!

translation of the voice-rule 1

rule 1 / ^ 9.

!

!

voice translation-profile PSTN

translate 1 called

!

!

voice-card 0

!

!

application

Service flash aa1: its - cisco.2.0.2.0.tcl

paramspace English language en

paramspace English index 1

Param aa-driver 0839959204

paramspace location English flash:

prefix English paramspace

!

!

!

Archives

The config log

hidekeys

!

!

interface FastEthernet0/0

IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

automatic duplex

automatic speed

H323-gateway voip interface

port of link voip H323-gateway 192.168.1.1

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

no ip address

Shutdown

automatic duplex

automatic speed

!

IP forward-Protocol ND

no ip address of the http server

no ip http secure server

!

!

!

control plan

!

!

!

voice-port 0/0/0

cover of the echo - cancel 32

connection ERA opx 3100

Description 08395959204

activation of the caller ID

!

voice-port 1/0/0

!

voice-port 0/0/2

!

voice-port 0/0/3

!

!

!

1010 Dial-peer voice pots

Service aa1

incoming called number 08395959204

direct line to inside

port 0/0/0

!

voice pots Dial-peer 2020

PSTN description

translation-profile outgoing PSTN

destination-model 9 t

Setup progress_ind allow 3

progress_ind enable progress 8

port 0/0/0

Forward-digits all the

!

Dial-peer voice 10 voip

destination-model 1...

Setup progress_ind allow 3

progress_ind enable progress 8

h323 voice-class 1

session target ipv4:192.168.1.2

DTMF-relay h245 alphanumeric

Codec g711ulaw

No vad

!

!

!

!

Line con 0

line to 0

line vty 0 4

Cisco password

opening of session

!

Scheduler allocate 20000 1000

end

I have configured the gateway h323 and attach files to router parttern on follow CUCM

What is the problem and how to solve?

Thanks for all the help.

Your DP pointing CUCM is wrong, or your ÉRA OPX, depending on what you need.

voice-port 0/0/0

cover of the echo - cancel 32

connection ERA opx 3100

Description 08395959204

activation of the caller ID

Dial-peer voice 10 voip

destination-model 1...

Setup progress_ind allow 3

progress_ind enable progress 8

h323 voice-class 1

session target ipv4:192.168.1.2

DTMF-relay h245 alphanumeric

Codec g711ulaw

No vad

Your DP is waiting for 1... and you send 3100, they must match.

You might need to change the significantt numbers and entering CSS, but only you can know

For outgoing, you are throwing 9 predot, but again, expect it in your RFP, again, change as you need.

voice pots Dial-peer 2020

PSTN description

translation-profile outgoing PSTN

destination-model 9 t

Setup progress_ind allow 3

progress_ind enable progress 8

port 0/0/0

Forward-digits all the

You cannot transfer the numbers all send you also 9 for each call

Change your configuration you want / need.

HTH

Java

If it helps, please note

www.Cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

First Pro CC and older versions of After Effects

I have a film Premiere CS6, which I will upgrade to CC.
There are several AE files related to the first file.
Also should I acquire After Effects CC for compatibility? Are there problems that I need to worry?

CC PrPro, AfterEffects and SpeedGrade versions must be in the versions 'corresponding' to knit back and forth & back. Then... If you go to keep the AE comps 'living' or change, you will need the same version of AE also. I suggest also using a copy of the original files, save their project in which case do not work in older programs. And... you can have CS6 and a CC version of the 'same' on-line applications on your computer.

Neil

Latest version of iTunes Mac and PC version of library conflicts

I have a few years held of my iTunes library on a NAS server and you are using a PC and a Mac to access the library. When I switched from Mac to PC or PC to Mac program would take a few moments 'update library' and then work normally.

Since the upgrade to the last version 12.4.3 PC and Mac version 12.5.0.158 is no longer, it works and on PC, get an error that the library was created in a newer version and cannot access I can work around this problem using the previous library but drop all changes made in the Mac version.

All the latest versions of OS and Windows, in addition to iTunes installed

Does anyone know if emissions are to be synchronized sometime soon so that they can be used interchangeably as in the past?

I'm 12.4.3.1 iTunes version on my Mac with no available iTunes update. Where did you got the new iTunes? Eve Apple has only available 12.4.3, https://www.apple.com/itunes/download/

I had version 9 ff. When I tried to get on FF, I got the 404 error code on the server. I uninstalled ff and reinstalled version 12. Always get the code 404. Help

I have Windows XP. I can not access FF. When I do I get error code 404 and the message "URL/firefox is not found on this server." It started today, I had version 9 ff. I've uninstalled and reinstalled version 12, but still not same error when you try to access the FF.
PS: Other browsers work fine

Try to open Firefox and Google by typing in the address bar at top and press on enter... If it works, I'd say something happened to your homepage settings and try this: How to set the home page

Where can I get a brief history of versions of Firefox, including the current and beta versions?

I just upgraded to 3.6 to 5.01 and received a message saying that this version is obsolete, and should I upgrade to 6.0. OK, well I would like to know just where, in the history of Firefox, it will take me. This is not the first time I have wondered about the Firefox version history and tried to find the information. Looks like you have all hide information or are ashamed of something (the number of versions, maybe?) and make it difficult to find this information. I don't understand the logic of making this information so difficult to find, if it is available to all.
(BTW, I'm a software sales engineer retirement for Tivoli/IBM products.)

Kind regards
Lynn Larsen

Is not hidden; not a secret. Relatively easy to find.

Enter "versions of firefox" (including the quotes) in Google, you can get: https://encrypted.google.com/search?sclient=psy & hl = in & lr = & tbs = qdr % 3Ay & source = hp & q = % 22firefox + releases % 22 & btnG = Search
- In the "Advanced search" options, I have "Date" set for the year passed
Second point, releases-MozillaWiki, gives you future versions, current and past.

You'll see version news on all the 6 weeks, with a few numbers of minor version, if any, as you had with Firefox 3.6.x and earlier versions.

If this answer solved your problem, please click 'Solved It' next to this response when connected to the forum.

How can I eliminate the undesirable bookmarks in the bookmarks on MAC bar, I use firefox 4.0.1 and previous version Ff 3.6, I had to organize the button bookmark on this version I have no

How can I eliminate the undesirable bookmarks in the bookmarks on MAC bar, I use firefox 4.0.1 and previous version Ff 3.6, I had to organize the button bookmark on this version I have no

Organize bookmarks is now labeled display all bookmarks.

CUCM and UCCX version compatibility

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for