custom, rule do not fire as expected

Similar Questions

• Rule does not fire

  Hi, I wrote a custom rule for checking a failover from the primary to a database of pending. The agent runs very well - without problems. Any other rule based on this agent also works. Information based on:

  The agent collects among other database status - which is a StringObservation. Te PRIMARY, STANDBY PHYSICAL values. Now I will inform each other DBA that a database from the database role.

  Scoping:

  _Table

  Data-driven

  Rule multiSeverity:

  Cond WARNING:

  def statusListe is server. DataService.retrieveLastNValues(scope,"database_role",2).value

  If (statusListe.size == 2) {}

  return statusListe [0]! = statusListe [1]

  } else return false;

  MessageText: whatever it is, all tested (with or without severity-level variables)

  If a failover is taken I don't receive any of my rule. But the condition in the rule editor (Scoped th my database) is true. Actual values:

  return the server. DataService.retrieveLastNValues(scope,"database_role",5).value--> [PRIMARY, PRIMARY, STANDBY PHYSICS, PHYSICAL STANDBY, PRIMARY]

  To test, I changed the rule also hunted time (30 years), but the result is the same - in no case.

  FMS is 5.5.4.7. Tips are welcome.

  Concerning

  Jochen

  Hi all

  solution of the problem of the rule:

  If a rule condition works with the server. DataService and that you do not use the ' #metric / observation #' notation in your rule, the services of the State has no knowledge on the correct extended metric and does not trigger the rule. The solution is quite simple:

  make a false definition with the notation "#". In my case:

  def a = #database_role #;

  It works, the rule fires.

  Concerning

  Jochen

• Customer reviews second day in a row: and you should inform your contact at Echosign I couldn't fill it electronically via my iPhone in Safari or Chrome.  I got the signature part via mobile phone to work but the submit button would not FIR

  Customer reviews received the second day in a row.

  And you should inform your contact at Echosign I couldn't fill it electronically via my iPhone in Safari or Chrome.  I got the signature part via mobile phone to work but the submit button not not fire and typing method did not work at all.  Suppose what echosign knows the percentage of people who are currently working off the coast of their mobile phones.

  WTF?

  Aaron, no thanks to Adobe (and a big thank you using Google Apps,) I finally could solve this problem.  The way the document authenticates in the back-end is through Google + Apps Admin profile.  Once I entered in the Console administration, compatible Google + for the created domain a + profile for the admin of the field, the auto shape filled the signature form after that I have authorized access to authentication on the shortcut menu.  Not sure if your situation is in Google Apps, but even if not, I'd be willing to bet that the problem on your side is the account that is used for authentication when you open your form.  I hope this helps!

• Canon 70 D my internal flash does not fire. It is broken or do I have an error in the settings.

  My Canon 70 D internal flash does not fire. I'm not sure if I made a mistake in my settings.  I usually shoot with a distance of exile 580 flash on the slave. The custom internal flash now or trigger a pre-Flash. So I think that it's broken by need help to rule out any possible error in the settings... Thank you

  CCTeen wrote:
  All these answers are in the correct sessions. If the "bulb" can break on the flash?

  Yes, certainly.

  High value Multi Shot Noise reduction option ISO NR will also disable flash, however.  To check this option too.

  

  If in doubt, perform a reset to the default values.  Now I'm really out clues .  You will need to send it.

• FxCop Custom rule. Creating rules files

  Hello

  In Visual Studio 2013, I try to add a custom rule to enfore Logging to all methods of code. I created DLLs as mentioned in the msdn article below

  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/CodeAnalysis/archive/2010/03/26/how-to-write-custom-static-code-analysis-rules-and-integrate-them-into-Visual-Studio-2010.aspx

  But after you create and test the dll I'm not able to create the. RuleSet file. And looks like without creating a. RuleSet file is not possible to add the rule to the project in 2013 VS.

  Pls share if there is no work around for this.

  Thank you

  Parag Dave

  Parag,

  This forum is for the generic of troubleshooting and solving problems like yours, you can ask here

• Creating custom rules of MARCH

  I want to be able to create a rule on:

  [Info/UncommonTraffic/Chat]

  [Info, UncommonTraffic, Chat, FileTransfer]

  [Info/UncommonTraffic/Chat/Proxy]

  .. .but be able to use the 'KEYWORD' field to trap on words like SSN / DOB and other keywords to trigger an e-mail action. Im guessing that this is not how the KEYWORD was intended to be used, but it is sure that looked like it when I put up. But as you may have guessed his does not work.

  Can someone tell me what im doing wrong or how can I achieve this to trap for PHI in our Organization.

  I've included a screenshot which may help to explain what page I'm looking at.

  http://razors-edge.org/dropbox/screenshot.jpg

  Thanks in advance.

  Jim,

  Good question! You did the correct support you use the 'keyword' option incorrectly. A device of MARCH is designed to parse and messages of aggregates of the declaration of the devices. In the example of "UncommonTraffic/Info/chat", typical features of statement are firewalls and IDS/IPS solutions. These all simply report on the presence of 'cat' traffic, no report the actual textual conversation. Unforunately the unit in MARCH is not really designed to work the way you want. Is this possible? Yes... you must have an application that is able to decode chat conversations before messages to MARS. In all honesty, it's a lot of work to make the MARCH camera doing something it's not designed to do. I hope this helps and don't forget to check my blog below for examples on how to use 'keywords' in a custom rule!

  -Mike

  http://CS-Mars.blogspot.com

• How to improve the custom rule by checking the existence of the role with INSERT permission?

  Hello

  following a custom rule to check the existence of some columns of audit - how can I improve this rule only to run for tables where there is a role with privileges to INSERT?

  Günter cordially

  function checkAudit (table) {}

  inserted_by = false;

  inserted_at = false;

  ruleMessage ="";

  tNom = table.getName ();

  If (tname.indexOf ('_DWH_') == - 1).

  {

  columns = table.getElements ();

  l = columns.length;

  for (var c = 0; c < l; c ++)

  {

  CNAME = columns [c] .getName ();

  If (cname == "INSERTED_AT") {inserted_at = true}

  If (cname == "INSERTED_BY") {inserted_by = true}

  }

  If (! inserted_at) ruleMessage = ruleMessage + not 'INSERTED_AT ';

  If (! inserted_by) ruleMessage = ruleMessage + not 'INSERTED_BY ';

  }

  If (ruleMessage! = "")

  Returns false;

  on the other

  Returns true;

  }

  checkAudit (table);

  Hi Gunter,

  the function to check if the column of table a insert privilege for role is less.

  It is possible insert are defined in table instead of the column - that does not check the function below.

  Philippe

  function hasColumnWithInsertForRole(table){
      sd = table.getRelationalModel().getStorageDesign();
      tp = sd.getStorageObject(table.getObjectID());
      if(tp!=null){
          roles = sd.getRoleSet().toArray();
          for(var i=0;i-1){
                  return true;
              }
          }
      }
      return false;
  }
  hasColumnWithInsertForRole(table);
  

• Custom rule works in the view RDF model?

  We create a model to view RDF from relational tables.

  Based on triplets mapped, we've created some custom rules in the rules of user base.

  Drop the involvement and create involvement again.

  But the query on the view model of RDF with defined rules of user base seems to be nothing happens.

  Could you please confirm if RDF model view support def rule base?

  Thank you.

  Note that user-defined inference would always regenerate involvement anyway.

  But, in addition, in the case of the model of RDFView materialized, the relational RDF conversion must be re-materialized if the content of the source tables changed since the last materialization of the RDF triple.

  Thank you

  -Smiled.

• How to apply a custom rule just for a relational model?

  Hello

  My drawing has several relationship models, but I want to check custom rules or apply custom transformations just to a specific relational model.

  So, I created a 'personal library' called 'Custom design rules' with the following function:

  function checkColComments() {}

  result = true;

  ruleMessage ="";

  If (! column.getCommentInRDBMS ()) {}

  ruleMessage = 'no comment in RDBMS defined ";

  errType = "error";

  result = false;

  }

  return the result;

  }

  In the 'custom design rules", I created a rule"Comments column Check", referring to the library and the method created previously.

  But, even if I chose the "relational model" which I intend to apply this validation rule, run the script for all open models.

  This seems a bug (I use v3.3.0.747 DDM,) because it is asked to select the template to apply the script, but subsequently, this selection is ignored.

  I have not yet tried the v4.0EA to see if it has been resolved or not and the release notes does not refer to the list of the bugs fixed (or I have not found) as it was in version 3.3.0.747.

  No idea if I'm doing something wrong or if the bug still exists?

  Thank you!

  Hello

  design (including custom) rules are still applied on a relational model. I wasn't able to reproduce a case when this rule is broken.

  However, there is a bug in the 'Custom Design Rules' functionality and the rule is applied on what is called "current" model and model selected is ignored.

  Which works very well in the "Design rules" feature, where the selected model is used.

  As workaround for 'Custom Design Rules' - you can generate DDL by using "Generate the DDL" icon and this model will become as "current"relational model. "

  Philippe

• Global rules, does not the kickoff when calling service Web CHECKIN_NEW

  Hi all
  
  We are trying to call web services CHECKIN_NEW/CHECKIN_UNIVERSAL with the required fields like the doctype, securitygroup, primary file title etc...
  
  It works fine, but the global rules were not the kickoff.
  
  Ex: Say, we have a rule that says that Field_A is mandatory when SecurityGroup = Public.
  
  But when we are invoking the webservice with SecurityGroup = Public, content is to check-in even if we do not value Field_A.
  
  We need global rules to kick sending and we give the error/warning that there is missing field...
  
  Can you please let us know if we are missing something here, there or another way to get this requirement?
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  See you soon,.
  V

  Funny... I created a global profile rule that triggers a RIDC for CHECKIN_NEW call (my rule checks for the existence of a value in the comments field), and the call to RIDC fails (as I expected) when I only provided no commentary and works when I provided a comment. If the rule engine is indeed fired.

  I think you must post your profile rule. More precisely, exactly how do you define your rule? I think you use the check box "use default value" for the field, which is incorrect for your use case. Also post the rule conditions of activation. They are also probably wrong for the case of the intended use.

  Please do not ask for examples of code until you post your profile in the rule details.

• Card rules do not run in the correct order

  Hello
  
  I am using FDM 11.1.2.1.
  
  I imported data and used the card rules: mapping was not what you expected, so I had to modify the sequence of the rules on the map.
  So I updated the sequences of the rules on the map and re-validated (even re-imported) = > I still have the same problem: the card rules do not run in the correct order.
  
  Below is an example of a line imported with this problem:
  
  Export of the import mode:
  PARTITIONKEY | CATKEY | PERIODKEY | ACCOUNT | ENTITY | AMOUNT | * UD5 *.
  749. 12. 2011-03-31 00:00:00 | 60413031 | MM31N0 | 773. * 000000 *.
  
  Rules of the card for the dimension of the UD5 (exported from FDM) (sorry it is not well presented :-/))
  
  %{DIMNAME/} SRCKEY SRCDESC TARGKEY WHERECLAUSETYPE WHERECLAUSEVALUE SEQUENCE VBSCRIPT PARTITIONKEY
  749 UD5 MTN424 project MTN424 MTN424 1
  749 UD5 R_PROJ_AXMECH project AXMECH #SCRIPT IN * 2 * ' * If Left (varValues (15), 2) = "" MM"" Then. "
  
  * Result = ""AXMECH *"
  Else if varValues (15) = "" MSIND0"" Then
  Result = ""AXMECH"
  Else if varValues (15) = "" MSTLP0"" Then
  Result = ""AXMECH"
  End If '.
  UD5 749 * 000000 * project undefined PROJET_NON_DEFINI * 3 *.
  749 UD5 R_PROJ_AUTRES other projects * AS * 4
  
  If despite the sequence 1-2-3-4, the UD5 000000 is mapped to PROJET_NON_DEFINI (rule explicit map with sequence 3) instead of AXMECH (IN the rule of the map with sequence 2).
  
  Thanks in advance for your help
  
  Fanny

  The card sequence numbers have effect in a single mapping type (Explicit, between, in, analogues), not through multiple types of mapping only. Explicit cards always take precedence.

• the custom words does not appear in my iPhone

  Hello

  I joined my iPhone IOS 10 6 more and I noticed that the custom words does not appear in my iPhone, even if I have them in my iTunes library. I signed up with the same Apple ID on all devices. Very few of them, I can access the lyrics in my phone, but not all of them (as he used to be in iOS 9)

  any help is appreciated.

  Thank you

  Ahmed

  I downloaded a program on my Mac (no app store unfortunately) called "get lyrical". automatically add lyrics to iTunes. Then in iTunes file > library > Update music library to iCloud. doing this during the last 20 minutes and so far it seems to work.

• E-mail rule does not always work.

  I have attached a copy of this message and the State which must have managed to get rid of it. If I change the rule and apply it, it works, but tomorrow if I get a similar message, the rule does not work. What's wrong?

  Thank you, Fred

  Try to delete the order and leave just the command Delete.  Back up e-mail in the junk mail folder in the Inbox and use the menu option Message ➙ apply rules to see if that solves it.

  

• Updated in 9.3 apps do not work as expected

  Phone AFterupdating 9.3 9.3 updated apps do not work as expected

  Can you describe the issue in more detail?

• Question of Safari and Chrome. indicates on the navigation screen. "An element of the Protection of the family filter does not work as expected. Restart your computer. If the problem persists, contact support.  Error: failed to hose CPI. »

  Question of Safari and Chrome. indicates on the navigation screen. "An element of the Protection of the family filter does not work as expected. Restart your computer. If the problem persists, contact support.  Error: failed to hose CPI. »

  Quit Safari, Chrome to quit smoking. If necessary Forcequit.

  Start Safari while holding the SHIFT key, select the menu Safari ClearHistory, then after this check that the homepage is the one you want.

  Do the same for Chrome.

  Close all browsers, restart the mac.