CWDM between Powerconnect 6200's
Hello
I try to get CWDM working between two sites in London on Dell Powerconnect 6224 and 6248 a. I have the 2 x 10 GB SFP + modules both at the back and some optical CWDM SFP + listening that are coded to dell.
I have a link on both sides, however, cannot get any job adequate connectivity. Another post suggested that they were working with these switches before CWDM.
I've put the transceiver diagnostic information below: Site1: Temperature 54.1 (oC) Voltage 3.293 (V) Current 23.3 (mA) Ouput Power -2.470 (dBm) Input Power -10.685 (dBm) Transmitter Fault No Loss of Signal No Site2: Temperature 50.1 (oC) Voltage 3.239 (V) Current 29.9 (mA) Ouput Power -0.496 (dBm) Input Power -13.747 (dBm) Transmitter Fault No Loss of Signal No On both sites we are seeing transmit data but no received: Site1: Receive Statistics Total Bytes(Octets) 0 Unicast Packets 0 Multicast Packets 0 Broadcast Packets 0 Packets with Errors 0 Packets Discarded 0 Transmit Statistics Total Bytes(Octets) 390208219 Unicast Packets 50889 Multicast Packets 140321 Broadcast Packets 1106698 Packets Discarded 3 Site2: Receive Statistics Total Bytes(Octets) 0 Unicast Packets 0 Multicast Packets 0 Broadcast Packets 0 Packets with Errors 0 Packets Discarded 0 Transmit Statistics Total Bytes(Octets) 2346760 Unicast Packets 0 Multicast Packets 24674 Broadcast Packets 0 Packets Discarded 0 Any suggestions, should CWDM SFP+ optics work in these switches? Thanks,Peter
Hello
I don't think that no matter what optical CWDM provided by Dell.
Anyway, I managed to borrow some perspective to test with and they work very well. CWDM works on these switches...
Peter
Tags: Dell Switches
Similar Questions
-
PowerConnect 6200 series interoperability with 3Com Switch 5500.
Hi all
We offer to our customer Dell PowerConnect 6224 and 6248 as they are expanding their network.
Their existing network is 3Com Switch 5500 and the main switch is 5500G - EI. Of course, on their network, they have mutiple VLAN and switch 5500G - EI core will make the VIRTUAL LAN routing.
I would like to know, is it questions about interoperability between 3Com Switch 5500 and Dell PowerConnect 6200 Series, especially on the VLAN routing?
Know your opinion.
Thank you and best regards,
Syed.
I'm not aware of any questions that you would see with the use of these switches together. On switches 62xx you set them VLAN, and then set the connection of 3Com in general or Trunk mode, allowing the VLANS on the connection.
Create a VLAN
Console (config) # vlan database
VLAN console(config-VLAN) # 2
VLAN console(config-VLAN) # 3
VLAN console(config-VLAN) # 4
output console(config-VLAN) #.
Configure the interface in Trunk mode and allow for VLAN through it.
console switchport mode trunk #.
console # permit trunk switchport vlan add 2,3,4 tag
You may need to set a static route on the 62xx switch so the traffic on the next hop.
Console (config) # ip route 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.0.2
Here are a few good white papers to look over. Not all of them concern the 62xx switch, but the information is always good.
www.Dell.com/.../app_note_38.pdf
www.Dell.com/.../app_note_2.pdf
www.Dell.com/.../pwcnt_link_aggregation.pdf
www.Dell.com/.../pwcnt_VLAN_interoperability.pdf
www.Dell.com/.../app_note_4.pdf
Thank you.
-
PowerConnect 6200 ACL does not seem to work
Hello
I have a total of four 6248 s two groups at different locations that are configured with VRRP + OSPF. I tried to set up a simple ACL on either a VLAN to allow a portion of the traffic and block everything else, but I can't make it work. I have tried many combinations to try to get this working, but so far without success. It's just a simple ACL, which should allow the web/http traffic on the 10.1.30.100 server and blocks everything else.
The only type of ACE that seem to work are either a "deny ip any any" or "permit ip any any" If you try an ACE with a destination host and subnet mask 0.0.0.0 it's just all this blocking. Has anyone else had problems of the ACL or is it just my incompetence in preventing me from getting the 6200 ACL work properly? I didn't have this problem, get the ACL list to work on our Cisco 2811 routers, just at the moment where I tried on the PC6248s.
- config
- int vlan 720
- no ip-group vlan720-in in access
- output
- No list of access-vlan720-en
- access-list vlan720-in permit tcp any 10.1.30.100 0.0.0.0 eq 80
- int vlan 720
- IP access-group vlan720-in in
- output
- output
- copy, run start
- There
Just an update on this issue. I worked with Dell to determine why the ACL does not seem to work. We discovered that the 6200 apply ACL to the traffic as a VLAN ACL Cisco card as opposed to a router ACL entry. This causes the ACL to apply to not only routed or transferred but also traffic switched in the same VLAN.
This has been the source of my problems that my traffic is not limited to a single 6200. I developed a simple laboratory to check that the 6200 applied traffic switched in the same VLAN ACL.
First the 6200 has one ACL applied to VLAN5 both PC1 and PC2 are in VLAN 5. They are both on the same subnet 192.168.5.0/24. The ACL has a statement of "permit icmp any one" but nothing else. The PC1 and PC2 are running Windows XP Pro with IIS is installed for the test. The firewall on both is disabled.
PC #1 IP: 192.168.5.2/24
PC #2 IP: 192.168.5.3/24[6200]
| |
| |
| [2950T #2] <-->[PC #2]
|
|
[2950T #1] <-->[PC #1]In this scenario PC1 and PC2 can ping each other without problem because of the permit icmp any any statement, but you cannot access the IIS site on each of the other computers.
Dell said that this is normal and if you want communication VLAN VLAN you 'license ip
' to make it work properly. I also found that traffic back from other VLANs were also denied because of the ACL applied on all of the incoming traffic. As a solution, the license statement should be included for ALL traffic back to the limited subnet other subnets. So in this case "ip enable any ". I find it a bit annoying that ACL is applied in the form of maps of VLAN not like real incoming router ACL as they are on similar Cisco devices as the 3750. So there is a work around. I hope they can solve the problem in a future update, because I really think that the 6200 is a great device.
Here you can see the difference between VLAN ACLs cards and router entry ACL where they are applied in what concerns local traffic to VLAN.
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst3750/software/release/12.2_25_see/configuration/guide/swacl.html#wp1572522 -
Creation of the VLAN between Powerconnect 5548 and F10 s4810...
In the coming months we will replace our network equipment. I was able to get their hands on the new gear at the beginning, and if I'm not traditionally a guy from the network, the project has been given to me and I started playing. The first thing that I wanted to work on was implemented VLANs. I have configured the switches like the picture below:
When I have IP every PC connected to the same subnet and apply VLAN10 to their respective ports, they aren't to pings within the same stack or between cells. My basic understanding is that they are, do they not? Did I miss something in my understanding of VLANS or is there a problem with my configs? I posted the configs below.
RTTMOACCESS01 config:
database of VLAN
VLAN 10,20,30,40,50
output
Add a voice vlan Yes-table Nortel___ 000181
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0001e3 Siemens_AG_phone___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00036 b Cisco_phone___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00096e Avaya___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 000fe2 H3C_Aolynk___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table Shoretel___ 001049
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0060 b 9 Philips_and_NEC_AG_phone
VLAN voice Yes-table add 00907 Polycom/Veritel_phone___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00e0bb 3Com_phone___
860 port address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
port 3260 address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
port 9876 address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
port 20002 address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
20003 port address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
port 25555 address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
hostname rttmoaccess01
no console logging
privilege 15
!
interface vlan 10
Name IT
!
interface vlan 20
name UserPCs
!
interface vlan 30
name UserTCs
!
interface vlan 40
the voice name
!
interface vlan 50
Name printers
!
gigabitethernet1/0/1 interface
switchport access vlan 10
!
tengigabitethernet1/0/1 interface
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 10 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 20 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 30 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 40 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 50 tag
!
gigabitethernet2/0/1 interface
switchport access vlan 10
!
tengigabitethernet2/0/1 interface
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 10 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 20 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 30 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 40 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 50 tag!
Default settings:
Service etiquette: 76BYTS1
SW version 4.1.0.8 (28 August 2012 time 11:17:36)
Gigabit Ethernet ports
=============================
Speed 1000
full duplex
negotiation
flow control
Auto MDIX
no back pressure
interface vlan 1
interface port-channel 1-32
spanning tree
spanning tree mode RSTP
basis of QoS
QoS trust cos
Enable IASRTTMOACCESS02 config:
database of VLAN
VLAN 10,20,30,40,50
output
Add a voice vlan Yes-table Nortel___ 000181
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0001e3 Siemens_AG_phone___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00036 b Cisco_phone___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00096e Avaya___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 000fe2 H3C_Aolynk___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table Shoretel___ 001049
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0060 b 9 Philips_and_NEC_AG_phone
VLAN voice Yes-table add 00907 Polycom/Veritel_phone___
Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00e0bb 3Com_phone___
860 port address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
port 3260 address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
port 9876 address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
port 20002 address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
20003 port address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
port 25555 address 0.0.0.0 iSCSI target
hostname rttmoaccess01
no console logging
privilege 15
!
interface vlan 10
Name IT
!
interface vlan 20
name UserPCs
!
interface vlan 30
name UserTCs
!
interface vlan 40
the voice name
!
interface vlan 50
Name printers
!
gigabitethernet1/0/1 interface
switchport access vlan 10
!
tengigabitethernet1/0/1 interface
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 10 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 20 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 30 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 40 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 50 tag
!
gigabitethernet2/0/1 interface
switchport access vlan 10
!
tengigabitethernet2/0/1 interface
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 10 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 20 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 30 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 40 tag
switchport general allowed vlan add 50 tag
!
Default settings:
Service etiquette: 76BYTS1
SW version 4.1.0.8 (28 August 2012 time 11:17:36)
Gigabit Ethernet ports
=============================
Speed 1000
full duplex
negotiation
flow control
Auto MDIX
no back pressure
interface vlan 1
interface port-channel 1-32
spanning tree
spanning tree mode RSTP
basis of QoS
QoS trust cos
Enable IASConfig RTTMOCORE
! Version 8.3.12.0
! Last modification of the configuration to Fri Jun 14 13:31:58 2013 default
! Startup-config updated Fri Jun 14 13:32:40 2013 default
!
start the primary system battery-unit 0: A:
start a system secondary battery-unit 0: B:
start the system stack-unit 0 default: A:
start the primary system battery-unit 1: A:
start a system secondary battery-unit 1: B:
start the system default stack-unit 1: A:
!
redundancy full automatic synchronization
!
Hardware watchdog
!
no console logging
!
hostname rttmocore
!
disposal of battery-unit 0 S4810
!
stack-unit 0 battery-group 14
!
stack-unit 0 battery-group 15
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet 0/46
no ip address
switchport
FlowControl rx tx off
no downtime
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet 0/47
no ip address
switchport
FlowControl rx tx off
no downtimedisposal of battery-unit 1 S4810
!
stack stack-unit 1-group 14
!
stack stack-unit 1-group 15
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet 1/46
no ip address
switchport
FlowControl rx tx off
no downtime
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet 1/47
no ip address
switchport
FlowControl rx tx off
no downtime
!
!
interface Vlan 1
!
interface Vlan 10
Description IT
Name IT
no ip address
Tagged TenGigabitEthernet 0/46-47
Tagged TenGigabitEthernet 1/46-47
Shutdown
!
interface Vlan 20
Description UserPCs
name UserPCs
no ip address
Shutdown
!
interface Vlan 30
Description UserTCs
name UserTCs
no ip address
Shutdown
!
interface Vlan 40
Speech description
the voice name
no ip address
Shutdown
!
interface Vlan 50
Printers description
Name printers
no ip address
Shutdown
!
Lldp Protocol
!
0 line console
line vty 0
line vty 1
line vty 2
line vty 3
line vty 4
line vty 5
line vty 6
line vty 7
line vty 8
line vty 9
!
endI would say lets start with one side and obtain communication of work between the two computers on the same stack at RTTMOACCESS01. The port settings for the 1/01 and 2/01 look great both in access mode for VLAN 10. Which IP addresses and subnets you assign to computers?
5548 to battery power battery connection 10 also appear to not be in a LAG, then we run two connections like that and they aren't in a SHIFT, we create a loop and a single connection will enter a blocking state.
For the connections between the 5548 and force 10, I suggest to turn them into a GAP. The command should look like this.
Console > activate
Console # configure
Console (config) # (config) # interface tengigabitethernet 1/0/1
Console (config) # port - 1 automatic mode group
output console #.
Console (config) #.
Do the same for Te2/0/1
Then we set up this OFFSET to set it up, and I would try to use the trunk instead of general mode mode.
Console (config) # interface port-channel 1
console switchport mode trunk #.
console # permit trunk switchport vlan add 10,20,30,40,50 tag
The same should be done for the Force switch 10.
Te0/46.1/46 in a SHIFT
Te0/47.1/47 in another SHIFT
Put in the trunk and let the VLANS on the trunk.
Allows to study these settings and see if we can make any progress.
Thank you
-
Aggregation of links between Powerconnect 7048 battery and battery S55 Force 10
Hi all
I'm trying to connect a battery 7048 with a stack of S55 (2 switches in each stack). I would use two ports (one on each switch) each battery to connect to each other. Can someone help me with the configuration of this please? I guess I'd go with LACP in this situation?
If orders to fill what could be made, it would be much appreciated.
Thank you, Carl.
On the 7048, placing the ports in a SHIFT with LACP looks like this:
Console (config) # interface gigabitethernet 0/1/2
Console (config-if) active in mode channel-group 1 #.
Console (config-if) output.
Console (config) # interface gigabitethernet 0/2/2
Console (config-if) active in mode channel-group 1 #.
Console (config-if) output.
Console (config) # interface port-channel 1
Console (Config-if-PO1) #.
And then configure the port channel but you need.
On the S55, this tech tip article will guide you in the process of creating a GAP.
Let us know if you have any questions.
See you soon
-
PowerConnect 6224: Dell SFP + port supports combine Dell SFP?
I have a Dell Powerconnect 6224 switch and I installed a Dual Port SFP + Module of adaptation for PowerConnect
6200 series at bay2 at the rear of the switch. I inserted a transceiver, SFP 1000BASE-LX, wavelength 1310nm 10km Reach in the SFP slot + and the other end is connected to a connector SFP 1gbe. I don't have any link. My question is if Dell SFP ports + supports SFP transceivers or it only supports SFP transceivers +?I checked the ports to help an SFP + SFP +, 10GbE, copper Direct Attach cable Twinaxial, and link LEDs are lighting up.
I believe that the SFP ports + back work with SFP transceivers. Ports before combo will work with SFP transceivers. Another thing to look at is the cable being used. Don't forget that there are specifications that are compatible with transceivers FPS are you wanting to use. A SFP + SFP connection would require that the SFP transceiver + supports a connection of 1 GB.
Hope this info helps.
-
N2048 vs PowerConnect 6248 switch
Hello
I would like to ask the professional.
For the communication of internal servers of our company, what to spend more powerful N2048 or PC6248?
We would like to use only ports of the team, LAG. No VLAN, no routing. Just "layer 2".
Thank you.
Best regards
MAxim Krol
Hi, Maxim,.
If you do not give me layer 2 the N2000 is the newer model. It has several CPU memory 1 GB vs. 256 MB and increased capacity of fabric and a faster transfer rate.
http://www.Dell.com/us/business/p/networking-N2000-Series/PD
http://www.Dell.com/us/business/p/PowerConnect-6200-series/PD
-
Adding a new Powerconnect 6248 switch to battery of existing production
A happy user PowerConnect here. I was wondering what were the experiences of others when you add an additional switch to an existing fireplace. My stack of 4 switches Powerconnect run happily on my side LAN and add a 5th to the stack. Any thoughts?
Here is a good article that deals with stacking Dell PowerConnect 6200 Series Switches. Page 13, adding a member of the battery with minimal Interruption
www.Dell.com/.../pwcnt_stacking_switches.pdf
Hope this helps,
-
How to get to the internet through several VLANs
I have 20 and 2 vlan configuration vlan10.
vlan10 can talk to vlan20 and vice versa.Gateway ip: 192.168.1.250
The only remaining problem is, customers/workstation on the VLANs can not access internet.
Here is my current config.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Current configuration:
! Description of the system "PowerConnect 6248, 3.3.4.1, VxWorks 6.5.
! 3.3.4.1 system software version
! Passage mode is configured as disabled
!
Configure
database of VLAN
VLAN 10.20
VLAN 10 1 routing
VLAN 20 2 routing
output
battery
1 2 Member
output
IP address no
IP routing
Route IP 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.250
IP route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.250
interface vlan 10
Routing
IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0output
interface vlan 20
Routing
address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g1
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g2
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g3
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g4
switchport access vlan 10
output!
interface ethernet 1/g5
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g6
switchport access vlan 10
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g7
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g8
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g9
switchport access vlan 20
output
!interface ethernet 1/g10
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g11
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g12
switchport access vlan 20
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g48switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10.20
output
output--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just for the route on gateway. :-)
Honestly, I didn't apply / edit my gateway settings, but the scenario had left me no place but
want to change. Kind of wanting the power of layer 3 cap-abilities.After adding 2 static routes x to the gateway. Clients/workstations were able to ping 8.8.8.8
(or access the internet).Here are the current routes.
Route ip console #show
The traffic code: R - RIP derived, O - OSPF derived, C - connected, S - static
B - BGP derived, IA - OSPF Inter zone
E1 - OSPF external Type 1, E2 - OSPF external Type 2
N1 - OSPF NSSA external Type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external Type 2S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.77.254, vlan 30
C 192.168.10.0/24 [0/1] directly connected, vlan 10
192.168.20.0/24 C [0/1] directly connected, vlan 20
192.168.77.0/24 C [0/1] directly connected, vlan 30Able to ping gateway now.
Reply from 192.168.77.254: bytes = 32 time<1ms ttl="">1ms>
Reply from 192.168.77.254: bytes = 32 time<1ms ttl="">1ms>
Reply from 192.168.77.254: bytes = 32 time<1ms ttl="">1ms>
Reply from 192.168.77.254: bytes = 32 time<1ms ttl="">1ms>Able to ping google now as well.
Response of 8.8.8.8: bytes = 32 time = 25 ms TTL = 49
Response of 8.8.8.8: bytes = 32 time = 25 ms TTL = 49
Response of 8.8.8.8: bytes = 32 time = 17ms TTL = 49
Response of 8.8.8.8: bytes = 32 time = 16 ms TTL = 49Thanks Blake for that, passing by really appreciate it. I hope this will be useful to others;
who know the * treats * Powerconnect 6200 series.FMP
-
What is the RAM size, buffer and flash, a PC 6224P
Hello!I need to know what the RAM buffer and the size of the memory, switch Dell PowerConnect 6224P Flash.Let me know.Kind regards!Hi lasandroLopez,
The size of the RAM is 256 MB. Flash memory is 32 MB and the packet buffer is 6.1 Mb
-
PowerConnect 6224 VLAN created, but impossible to do a ping between customers
1 created vlan 2 with two ports 17.19 with ip 10.0.1.2/24
2 created vlan 3 with two ports 13.15 with ip 10.0.2.2/24
attempt to create inter routing vlan
1 pc windows connected with ip 10.0.1.3/24 and a gateway to port 17 10.0.1.2
2 connected windows pc with ip 10.0.2.3/24 and a gateway 10.0.2.2 to port 15
Unable to get the Ping between two clients any help would be much appreciated, thank you in advance and running config pasted below
coresw1 #show running-config
! Current configuration:
! Description of the system "PowerConnect 6224, 3.3.7.3, VxWorks 6.5.
! 3.3.7.3 system software version
! Passage mode is configured as disabled
!
Configure
database of VLAN
VLAN 2-3, 5
VLAN 2 1 routing
VLAN 3 2 routing
output
location of SNMP Server "Data Center"
contact SNMP Server «»
hostname "coresw1".
unicast SNTP client enable
10.0.0.1 SNTP server
clock timezone 5 minutes 30 zone 'IST '.
battery
1 1 member
output
IP 10.0.0.193 255.255.255.0by default-gateway IP 10.0.0.1
IP - peekaygroup.com domain name
name-server IP 10.0.0.1
without enabling ipv6
IP routing
interface vlan 2
name "LAN1.
Routing
10.0.1.2 IP address 255.255.255.0
bandwidth 10000
IP mtu 1500
output
interface vlan 3
name "LAN2.
Routing
IP 10.0.2.2 255.255.255.0
bandwidth 10000
IP mtu 1500
output
interface vlan 5
name "RIL Internet"output
level of 8a9f2a72d65baf40b48108874cd50592 user name 'admin' password encrypted 15
!
interface ethernet 1/g13
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g15
switchport access vlan 3
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g17
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g19
switchport access vlan 2
output
!
interface ethernet 1/g20
switchport access vlan 5output
!
interface ethernet 1/g22
switchport access vlan 5
output
SNMP-server community public rw
outputThis blog does a good job of showing the different firewall rules to add. You said that you have already tweaked the firewall some, I would just check the measures taken.
http://www.sysprobs.com/enable-ping-reply-Windows-7
If there is no antivirus software installed, try a break/disabling it to test and see if it makes a difference.
I don't see anything on the config which would prevent pings happen.
-
VLAN between 2 powerconnect 6224 using XFP modules
Dear friends,
I have 2 switches powerconnect 6224 interconnected using optical fiber and XFP ports on the rear panel of the switch.
There is no configuration of the battery between them.
The distance between the two switches is 500 metres and they both work correctly when you use the vlan by default (use of the LAN)
I created a virtual LAN using 2 ports on a firewall and I created the same vlan on the second firewall, but I can't see a VLAN traffic goes to the other.
Also, I tried to configure the port as trunk but same result.
The vlan works very well in a single switch, but traffic is not able to flow to the second switch.
You have an idea why does not?
Maybe is not posible to have VLANs using xfp connections...
Any idea would be greatly popular.
Thanks in advance!
Rear ports are labeled xg1, 2, 3, 4. So, if the connection is made using the xg1 on a single switch for xg1 on the other switch. Then you enter interface 1/xg1 and make configuration changes.
-
Vs LACP LAG between two PowerConnect 5448 s
Hi all.
Just got a switch configuration quad for our infrastructure EqualLogic SAN using PowerConnect 5448 s. One thing I never did before her configuration of aggregation of links.
If I wanted to set up an aggregate of 4-port connection between two switches, say on ports 1 to 4, and our iSCSI VLANS is 1000, the below will work?
serial interface ethernet g(1-4)
channel-group mode 1 on
interface port-channel 1
switchport general
switchport General pvid 1000
I've seen documentation on how to get the ports-working channels between a 5000 or 6000 switch and a Cisco Catalyst switch, but not just any what docs on how to connect two switches PowerConnect. The doc of interoperability for Cisco <->Dell seems to want to use LACP on the side of Dell. I wonder, should I configure and link LACP on the two 5448 aggregate s I have are running?
Thanks for in advance for any advice or assistance!
Joe
-> -
Anyone know if knew that Opteron 6200 (Interlagos) are compatible with Opteron 6100 (Magny Cours) VMotion?
VMware used to maintain an up-to-date list of processors with a compatibility matrix, but I didn't see a current copy of this document within a certain time. The last that I could dig up was 2008, so I ask my question here.
Also, if anyone knows of a compatibility matrix was updated that they could tell me, that would be helpful.
Thank you!
Allen Beddingfield
Systems engineer
The University of Alabama
Allen: I can confirm that VMotion works between Opteron 6100 and 6200 if you are using the CVS 'AMD Opteron Genesis 3 (no 3DNow!) '.
-
Difference between Dell Powerconnect N4032F and 8132F
Hello!
In the last days, the Dell PowerConnect 8100 disappeared from the Dell Web site and now, the M4000 series with the same characteristics are presented.
It's just a change of name or these devices differ in some way? The M4000 firmwares is usable on 8100 switches in the future?
Thank you
Kind regards
Stril
Dell PowerConnect N4000 switches series both Dell Networking PC8100 series share the same version of the firmware of the image (for example, N4000v6.1.0.1.stk). The Dell Networking N4000 series switches can be stacked with switches Dell Networking PC8100 of the series with any battery necessary for the performance of 6.0.0.8 or later firmware (6.1.0.1). Dell Networking PC8100 switches can support the firmware both 5.x and 6.x versions, but Dell Networking N4000 can support only the 6.0.0.8 and later versions of firmware (6.1.0.1)
I hope this helps.
B
Maybe you are looking for
-
Sometimes after using the password to access an account during a given session of firefox, I want to "repeal" this ability of automatic access (i.e. require type the password again once) without having to put an end to the current session and restart
-
El Capitan 10.11.3 running very slow. A suggestion of the community, I downloaded EntreCheck software to check everything. Here is the report. I hope someone can take out its contents and tell me how to fix? Thank you, Steve EtreCheck version: 2.7.7
-
Hello I use the LabVIEW Vi series to send commands to a DUT. I use the a Sparkfun USB to Serial converter cable for the interface, by connecting directly to the TX and RX pins of my DUT (an MCU). I am able to send and receive data without any problem
-
The microphone works on my other laptop so I know it's good. I entered in the control panel and did all the standard tricks without success. The same microphone works well with Skype on my other HP Pavilion dv5000 XP using the old driver. Maybe I'm m
-
Missing: "liveupdate.dll.
Bought new hp h8 1234 pc, tried to install one of my wise programs care 365 utility progam, installs successfully, but when I open the program, missing popup error: ' liveupdate.dll "" "and does not open. This wise care 365 ran fine on my old pc: hp