DAQmxReadAnalogF64 gives unexpected results with 9239 of Ni - DAQmx

Similar Questions

• Oracle 12 c - unexpected result with the insertion of the DBA_VIEWS view

  Hello

  I try inserting the DBA_VIEWS fields in a table belonging to a common C a PDB file ##SA user:

  (a) the PDB PDBORCL using user C ##SA connection:

  SQL * more: Production of liberation 12.1.0.1.0 kills him Sep 10 16:21:39 2013

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2013, Oracle.  All rights reserved.

  Enter the password:

  Last successful login time: kills Sep 10-2013 16:18:26 + 02:00

  Connected to:

  Database Oracle 12 c Enterprise Edition Release 12.1.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production

  With the options of partitioning, OLAP, advanced analytics and Real Application Testing

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > see the con_name

  CON_NAME

  ------------------------------

  PDBORCL

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > see the con_id

  CON_ID

  ------------------------------

  3

  (b) I create the table user SA_VIEWS_V

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > select count (*) in the dba_views;

  COUNT (*)

  ----------

  6220

  1 selected line.

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > create table sa_views_v (owner varchar2 (128), view_name varchar2 (128));

  Table created.

  (c) the insertion in the table SA_VIEWS_V gave me only 65 rows at the same time lines of content 6220 dba_views:

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > INSERT INTO SA_VIEWS_V (OWNER, VIEW_NAME) SELECT MASTER, VIEW_NAME DBA_VIEWS;

  65 lines were created.

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > commit;

  Validation complete.

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > SELECT MASTER, VIEW_NAME DBA_VIEWS;

  ...

  IX

  IX

  IX

  SH

  6220 selected lines.

  (d) you will find above the executed plan of the insert and the single select statement:

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > select * from table (dbms_xplan.display_cursor ('aj3vkggtvv9d9'));

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  SQL_ID, aj3vkggtvv9d9, number of children 0

  -------------------------------------

  INSERT INTO SA_VIEWS_V (OWNER, VIEW_NAME) SELECT VIEW_NAME, MASTER OF

  DBA_VIEWS

  Hash value of plan: 1585970530

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | INSERT STATEMENT.                  |       |       |   136 (100) |          |

  |   1.  LOAD TABLE CLASSIC |                  |       |       |            |          |

  |*  2 |   FILTER                         |                  |       |       |            |          |

  |*  3 |    HASH JOIN |                  |    65.  6045.   136 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  4 |     HASH JOIN |                  |    65.  4875.   132 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |   5.      NESTED LOOPS |                  |       |       |            |          |

  |   6.       NESTED LOOPS |                  |    65.  3315 |   131 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |   7.        INDEX SCAN FULL | I_VIEW1 |    65.   325.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  8 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_OBJ1 |     1.       |     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |   9.       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | OBJ$             |     1.    46.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |  10.      INDEX SCAN FULL | I_USER2 |   131.  3144 |     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |  11.     TABLE ACCESS FULL | USER$ |   131.  2358.     4 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  | * 12 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL | USER_EDITIONING$ |     1.     6.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |  13.    SEMI NESTED LOOPS.                  |     1.    29.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  | * 14 |     INDEX SKIP SCAN | I_USER2 |     1.    20.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  | * 15 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_OBJ4 |     1.     9.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  | * 16.    TABLE ACCESS FULL | USER_EDITIONING$ |     1.     6.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  2 filter (((IS NULL AND "O". ("TYPE #" <>88) OR BITAND ("O". ("" FLAGS ", 1048576) = 1048576 OR

  BITAND ("U". "" SPARE1»(, 16) = 0 OR (((SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv', 'current_edition_name') = ' ORA$ BASE ", AND)))"

  "U"." TYPE #"(<>2) OR ('U'." ' TYPE # '= 2 AND 'U'. "SPARE2" = TO_NUMBER (SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv ',' current_e)) "

  dition_id'))) or IS NOT NULL) AND IS NOT NULL)))

  3 - access("O".") SPARE3 '=' U '. ("" USER # ")

  4 - access("O".") "OWNER # '=' U '. ("" USER # ")

  8 - access("O".") ' OBJ # '=' V '. (' ' OBJ # ")

  12 filter (("TYPE #" =: B1 ET "UE".)) "THE USER #" =:B2))

  14 - access("U2".") TYPE # "= 2, AND"U2"." SPARE2 "= TO_NUMBER (SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv ',' current_editi))"

  on_id')))

  filter (("U2". "TYPE #"= 2, AND "U2"."" SPARE2 "= TO_NUMBER (SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv ',' current_edit))"

  ion_id')))

  15 - access("O2".") DATAOBJ #"=: B1 AND 'O2'." ' TYPE # '= 88 AND 'O2'. "OWNER #"= "U2". ("" USER # ")

  16 filter ((' EU'. "TYPE #" =: B1 AND 'EU '. "THE USER #" =:B2))

  47 selected lines.

  C##SA@pdborcl 10.09.2013 > select * from table (dbms_xplan.display_cursor ('bc4f1jh1snwdp'));

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  SQL_ID, bc4f1jh1snwdp, number of children 0

  -------------------------------------

  SELECT THE OWNER, DBA_VIEWS NOM_DE_VUE

  Hash value of plan: 1508506130

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Pstart. Pstop |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                  |       |       |     1 (100) |       |       |

  |   1.  PARTITION LIST ALL |                  | 10000 |  1289K |     0 (0) |     1.     2.

  |   2.   TABLE FIXED FULL | X$ COMVW$ 5885ef62 | 10000 |  1289K |     0 (0) |       |       |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  14 selected lines.

  You have an idea about this result?

  Thank you in advance,

  Arnaud.

  Arnaud,

  This has a fairly simple explanation.

  In 12cR1, there are common objects, and there are local objects. The definition of a common object is stored in the ROOT, and only a stub for the object is stored in the PDB. The definition of a local object is stored in the PDB.

  When DBA_VIEWS is questioned in a PDB file, so we must return to lines of views both as common as the result of the query. If views Commons are not returned, then several views that a client is used to see in the result of a query DBA_VIEWS to 11.2 and earlier versions not will be seen in paragraph 12.1. For example, ALL_TABLES, DBA_OBJECTS, etc.

  When DBA_VIEWS is questioned in a PDB file, then we extraction of lines for local opinions of PDB and common views of ROOT lines. The first has value ORIGIN_CON_ID equal to the ID of the container of the PDB to which you are connected, and they value ORIGIN_CON_ID equal to the ID of the ROOT container. Given that the recovery of these lines should be done in two different containers, we go through a fixed table X$ COMVW$ *.

  The gap that you are experiencing is because this fixed table based assessment is used only to SELECT and not for etc. SELECT, INSERT AS SELECT, CREATE TABLE AS.

  Let me know if that makes sense.

  Thank you

  Thomas

• Unexpected result with select max (colmn) in anonymous block

  Hello
  
  The following query gives me 28 800 like sum (sal)

  SELECT SUM(salary)
  FROM employees 
      WHERE department_id =60
  O/P is :  28800

  But when I use the above query in anonymous block, it gives me 684400

  DECLARE
   v_sum_sal NUMBER;
   department_id employees.department_id%TYPE := 60;
  BEGIN
      dbms_output.put_line ('The department_id is'||department_id);
     SELECT SUM(salary)
        into v_sum_sal 
      FROM employees 
      WHERE department_id = department_id ;
     dbms_output.put_line ('The sum of sal is'||v_sum_sal);
  END;

  Exit instructions above gives me 684400 as output... But the grounds are 28800
  
  You can me why the output differs block anonymous reference please

  Hello

  What about prefixing all your PL/SQL variables so that they do not match a column_name :

  DECLARE
   v_sum_sal NUMBER;
   v_department_id employees.department_id%TYPE := 60;
  BEGIN
      dbms_output.put_line ('The department_id is'||v_department_id);
     SELECT SUM(salary)
        into v_sum_sal
      FROM employees
      WHERE department_id = v_department_id ;
     dbms_output.put_line ('The sum of sal is'||v_sum_sal);
  END;
  

  Because, with the first names, where clause was equivalent to:

  where 1=1
  

• Unexpected result with Array.sort

  There seems to be a problem with the sort function when sorting the table contains several elements that are equal. I tried to illustrate this in the most simple form below:

  var test1:Array = ['a', 'b', 'this,' would be '];

  var test2:Array = [', 'c', 'b', 'a'];

  var test3:Array = ['a', 'b', 'c', ' a'];

  var test4:Array = ['a', ' a ',' b ', 'a'];

  trace (test1.sort (Array.RETURNINDEXEDARRAY)); Should be 0,1,2,3 (well!)

  trace (test2.sort (Array.RETURNINDEXEDARRAY)); Should be 3,2,1,0 (good!)

  trace (test3.sort (Array.RETURNINDEXEDARRAY)); Must be 0,2,3,1 (evil)

  trace (test4.sort (Array.RETURNINDEXEDARRAY)); Must be 0,1,3,2 (evil)

  / * Output

  0,1,2,3

  3,2,1,0

  3,0,1,2

  3,1,0,2

  */

  Can anyone find a reason of incompatibility, or is this a bug in the sorting method?

  test3: must be 0,3,1,2 or 3,0,1,2.  They are the same.

  test4: 0,1,3,2 is the same as 3,1,0,2 is the same as 1,0,3,2 is the same as 0,3,1,2 etc.  That is to say, as long as the index 2 is the last, they still.

  Oh, I see the problem.  you think flash is assign an index to the elements of the original array.

  It is not the case.  the method released the list of indices in the sort order.  IE, 0,3,1,2 means the original elements of 0th and 3rd tables are first and 2nd and the 1st element is the third and the 2nd element is the last.

  so, if you wanted to list the elements of original paintings using your sort order for test3, for example, you would use:

  test3 [0], test3 [3], test3 [1], test3 [2] and you expect, a, b, c

• PL/SQL procedure in another scheme gives unexpected result call

  I have a SQL Script that does this:
  Conn pnr / < password of user pnr >;
  Set serveroutput on;
  exec vms.disable_all_fk_constraints;
  SELECT the owner, constraint_name, status FROM user_constraints WHERE constraint_type = 'R ';
  
  and the disable_all_fk_constraints procedure, which is owned by the user 'vms' is defined as:
  create or replace
  procedure disable_all_fk_constraints is
  v_sql VARCHAR2 (4000);
  Start
  dbms_output.put_line ('disable all referential integrity constraints.');
  for rec in (SELECT table_name, constraint_name FROM user_constraints WHERE constraint_type = 'R') loop
  dbms_output.put_line ('Disabling constraint' | rec.constraint_name |) 'from ' | Rec.table_name | '.');
  v_sql: = 'ALTER TABLE ' | Rec.table_name | "DISABLE THE CONSTRAINT ' | Rec.constraint_name;
  execute immediate (v_sql);
  end loop;
  end;
  
  When I run the script SQL, the call to vms.disable_all_fk_constraints disables the FK forced in the schema "vms", while I wanted to disable the FK constraints in schema "pnr" (the applicant of the procedure). I know I could do this job by copying disable_all_fk_constraints to the 'pnr' schema procedure and calling it as "+ exec disable_all_fk_constraints; +"inside, the SQL script but I want to avoid having to duplicate the PL/SQL procedure in each schema that uses it.
  
  What can I do?
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Create the procedure with AUTHID CURRENT_USER, like this:

  create or replace
  procedure disable_all_fk_constraints
  AUTHID  CURRENT_USER               -- Added
  is
      v_sql VARCHAR2(4000);
  begin
      ...
  

  With AUTHID DEFINE (which is the default), everything that happens inside the stored procedure goes as if the Owers of procedure was done, except that the USER function returns always the name of the actual user.

  Published by: Frank Kulash, January 11, 2011 11:07
  I just see response to Sven. It is true, that it is a very dangerous thing to do.

• Unexpected behavior with the Option "record in the result.

  Hello

  I have unexpected behavior with the Option "record in the result.

  I have a few steps in the subsequence 'X', this subsequence passes a Boolean parameter. According to the value of the parameter I change the "Recorgind results" Option to report it or not. The thing is that if 'result Recorgind' set at race time I modofy by changing the value of Step.ResultRecordingOption to "Enable" and "Disable", the step is not reported until the same sous-suite 'X' is called for the second time (without changing the parameter passed).

  For example: (Preconditon: result Recorgind Option of all value sous-suite x are defined as Disable)

  1 CallSubsequenceX(Parameter: Enable)

  2 CallSubsequenceX(Parameter: Enable)

  3 CallSubsequenceX(Parameter: Disable)

  4 CallSubsequenceX(Parameter: Disable)

  Expected result:

  1. measures have been reported.

  2. measures have been reported.

  3. measures have not been reported.

  4. measures have not been reported.

  Result:

  1. measures would not same value Step.ResultRecordingOption has been changed to 'enable '. (Not Ok)

  2. measures have been reported. (Ok)

  3. measures reported same value Step.ResultRecordingOption has been changed to 'disable '. (Not Ok)

  4. measures have not been reported. (Ok)

  I use TestStand 2013 (5.1.0.226)

  Thanks in advance.

  -Josymar.

  Hi josymar_guzman,

  I just review the sequence and indeed we´re experience unexpected behavior with the Step.ResultRecordingOption callback. By a reason when you run the callback in the expression before each step section, the statement runs only until the next sequence is called, which is not what we want.

  To avoid this, you can place a statement before each step of the sequence, so you can change the State of the Option "record result" for the sequence running (and it is only the following). You can try something like this

  

  where the expression of the statement will be the recall "RunState.NextStep.ResultRecordingOption is YourCondition". With this, we guarantee that the results of the next step will be saved or not. I also remove the expression in the expression prior to each step section, because the condition is now on the statement before each step.

  I tried and it works fine. I´ll set the sequence that you share with me, with the changes. I hope this will help you and solve your problem.

• Satellite L10 and keyboard:-shift key gives wrong results

  Using the SHIFT key with most of other than a-z keys gives bad result.
  I tried to re - install a driver via Control Panel / keyboard with the Toshiba XP Home CD inserted but not better driver is found.
  Control Panel / regional and language setting is English UK

  Hello, Alan

  It will be nice if you can give us more information. What specific keyboard of the country you have? What you want to do exactly? Give us a few examples please.

• When I subtract two numbers DBL and try to compare the result with another DBL, it fails

  I found a curious problem with subtraction and compare numbers DBL in LabVIEW (8.6). Here's how it works:

  1. subtract two numbers DBL such that the result is not incorporated. (Say, 3.2 - 3.1)

  2. compare the result with a constant/control that is on the result of the subtraction (in the example, 0.1)

  3 see the output of the comparison.

  If the result of the subtraction is an integer, the Boolean result is (as expected). If the result is not complete, the comparison fails.

  (Now, if I simply compare two floating point numbers, it works, so the issue is not with the node comparison itself, but with the data that is entered to the node). Can someone understand why this happens? It's unexpected, it's a pretty serious bug.

  It is provided with all programming languages. Numbers do not have an exact binary floating-point representation. This has been discussed endlessly. Never use the equal function with floats. You can use the function in the range and force.

• LEFTOUTER join querry which gives bad result

  Hello

  I have tables like below.when I perform a left outer join issue IDs and startdate he gives invalid results.when I write in request

  It does not correct result because there is no data for 16 jan. It should give no results. But it shows all records. How do I solve this problem

  SQL:

  Select a.id, a.date, b.val, a.tot, b.net, b.cre

  FROM table1 a

  join table2 b left

  "on a.id = b.id and a.date = b. and a.date ='02-Feb-2014."

  In the tables below contains no data for the month of February but still im getting the incorrect data. He must not returnany files right?

  Table1:

  ID	Date	Val	tot
  1	January 1, 13	1	9
  2	2 January 13	3	8
  3	3 January 13	4	7
  4	January 4, 13	5	6
  5	5 January 13	6	5

  Table2:

  ID	Date	NET	CRE
  1	January 1, 13	1	9
  2	13 January 13	3	8
  3	3 January 13	4	7
  4	January 4, 13	5	6
  5	5 January 13	6	5

  "It should not returnany files right?

  Wrong, there is no where clause so it should return all the records in a padded with NULL values for b.

• Analyze the result with C4680

  A few days ago my printer gives a copy with a black beam down.

  The printer is just two years.

  It seems that the scantransport will not return to its initial position.

  Can someone help me to follow or to solve this problem.

  Thank you for helping and to everyone who says a 2013 good and healthy

  Sometimes when I make a copy of an original. Printing is no problem.

  It seems that the bar goes all the way up to the form I want to copy or scan.

  I get an error on the printer screen message telling me that the scan has failed.

  I'll try the HP support as well.

  Thanks again.

  Sjer

• Computer started to delay the result with a click of a button, etc. by seveal seconds.

  Have aw computer laptop Dell Inspiron 1501 XP SP3. Computer started to delay the result with a click of a button, etc. by seveal seconds.  A ran the anti-virus, malware search, keylogers search and found nothing.  The delay also occurs when you use an application such as CorelDRAW, Word, WordPerfect programs, etc.  any ideas what is happening or where to look? Thank you.

  You experience this delay all the time, or they occur from time to time?

  Could complete you the following procedure to obtain information about your current system and post here, so I can be more specific in suggestions.
  0 close the programs as open as you can before the first step.
  1 copy the following line below exactly as it appears:
  Taskpad cmd /C /V > tempo & tempo notebook
  2. press on + R
  3. paste copied line run window and press enter or click Ok.
  4 copy all the information from the Notepad window. (The list can be long, you can use + a combination to select all)
  5 paste info copied to the next reply.
  6. after that you can close the Notepad window.

• 0xC000021A {fatal system error}, the initial session process or the process of the complete system in unexpected ways with the blocking state 0 x 00000000 (0xc0000034 0x001008ac) the system has been halted

  Hello! I got this message from malware (I clicked to delete) in surfing on firefox and after awhile the explorer.exe closes with an error. I try to open the Task Manager and it says explore cannot be found!
  I rebooted and then I got this message "0xC000021A {fatal system error}, the initial session process or the process of the complete system in unexpected ways with the blocking state 0 x 00000000 (0xc0000034 0x001008ac) the system has been halted" and can't get anywhere.
  I can't even go in safe mode, the same error messages appears.

  Hi James,

  You could try the Startup Repair to see if it solves the problem:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/startup-repair-frequently-asked-questions

  Chris
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Help in parsing the XML result with ksoap2

  Hi, I have another problem. I used KSOAP2 to call a web service net but when I catch him to display the result with a selectionneret, it shows the following screen:

  

  reading on the web, I didn't find a good way to analyze the result. Could you help me with this? Thanks in advance

  Thanks, the problem here is that we use the same webservice for more devices and a web page in .NET) that's why we use this webservice. Anyway thanks for the help. I read a lot of posts and the only way is perhaps to save the XML document in the SD card

• script which gives the hostname with more CPU resources and memory available

  Hello

  Anyone have a script which gives the hostname with more CPU resources and memory available in the cluster?

  Concerning

  Vickie

  Hello, VicMware-

  You can get the host with the free CPU, or with the most free memory resources, using the following:

  ## get the host with the most free CPU cyclesGet-Cluster myCluster0 | Get-VMHost | Select-Object Name,    @{n="CpuMhzFree"; e={$_.CpuTotalMhz - $_.CpuUsageMhz}} | Sort-Object -Property CpuMhzFree -Descending | Select -First 1
  
  ## get the host with the most free memoryGet-Cluster myCluster0 | Get-VMHost | Select-Object Name,    @{n="MemGBFree"; e={$_.MemoryTotalGB - $_.MemoryUsageGB}} | Sort-Object -Property MemGBFree -Descending | Select -First 1
  

  The first would have produced something like:

  Name          CpuMhzFree
  ----          ----------
  myVMHost0          25384
  

  And the latter didn't would be out:

  Name           MemGBFree
  ----           ---------
  myVMHost4        122.323
  

  .. .or each of these host computers are those with the most free memory/CPU cluster, respectively.  What to do the things for which you are looking?

• ASCIISTR function that gives different results

  Hi Experts,
  
  I use the function ASCIISTR and it gives different results in SQLPLUS and TOAD
  
  SQLPLUS
  

  SQL> SELECT ASCIISTR('é') UC FROM DUAL
    2  ;
  
  UC
  -----
  \201A
  
  SQL> SELECT ASCIISTR('ú') UC FROM DUAL;
  
  UC
  -----
  \00A3

  TOAD
  

  SELECT ASCIISTR('ú') UC FROM DUAL
  
  \00FA
  
  SELECT ASCIISTR('é') UC FROM DUAL
  
  \00E9

  I know experts here will be reluctant to respond to questions about the TOAD, but I wanted to understand if I'm missing something. I checked the NLS_SESSION_PARAMETERS in SQLPLUS and TOAD, and they are the same. :-(does not understand this behavior
  
  Version of database Oracle Database * 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production *.
  
  Thanks in advance!

  The default code for the command line page is 437, identical to TOAD, you want to get the code page 1252

  SQL> host chcp
  Active code page: 437
  
  SQL> SELECT ASCIISTR('é') UC FROM DUAL;
  
  UC
  _____
  \201A
  
  SQL> host chcp 1252
  Active code page: 1252
  
  SQL> SELECT ASCIISTR('é') UC FROM DUAL;
  
  UC
  _____
  \00E9
  
  SQL>