Deterimining broadband bandwidth/competitor users / connect from newspapers

Similar Questions

• Read current user connected from java code VOImpl

  Hi experts,

  I use Jdev 12.1.3 and I would like to read the value of adf.context.securityContext.getUserName () in the java code of a VOImpl so I can pass it as a parameter to a PLSQL stored procedure.

  How can I do?

  Thank you very much
  Jose.

  You can use the code below:

  String currentUser store = ADFContext.getCurrent () .getSecurityContext () .getUserPrincipal () .getName ();

  Thank you

• How to prevent users from a domain network to connect from another pc

  We have a domain based LAN with 6 users with individual workstations and a server (windows server 2003).
  Is it possible to configure a workstation in such a way that they would make newspaper-on the system using only a user ID?
  Currently all users can connect from any workstation using his ID and password. I want to avoid this.
   
  For example:
  The USER is a user who uses a WS-1 station,
  B the USER is a user who uses WS-2 workstation,
  USER-C is a user using the workstation WS-3
  then currently USER 1, USER 2 and USER-3 can log - on the system from any workstation using a credential.
   
  I want to avoid this.
   
  What I want is, WS-1 workstation can only be connected to the USER-A credentials, the WS-2 workstation can only be connected by the credentials of the USER-B and so on.
   
  Is this possible?

  Hello Chetan,

  You're in the wrong Forum for this type of question which is one most appropriate for the ad server and group policy (with possibly the local policy on the workstations).  I would move this if I could, but we do not have this feature in our magic Toolbox.

  To start, see if the information contained in this TechNet article help: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/3639e354-3a41-41b9-bf2e-74abc49e23d6/user-permision-on-workstations.

  If not, then open a new question/thread in this same forum http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/ and ask your question there.  I am sure that you will get detailed advice covering both sides of the situation (Server and workstation) better than here where there is a tendency to focus only on client computers, not servers, unless that quite simple (and being an MCSE, I know that's not really simple - but it also isn't really very difficult if you understand the basics - and even then they should be able to help) to find articles or provide instructions to pass you this part).  I have no doubt that they can also bring about changes, you need to establish which are specific to the workstation (and maybe even have a model of batch file to semi-automate the process - but now I'm guessing / hoping).

  In any case it is really where you should start and return only if explain you what it is about the customers that they cannot handle and need us to help you (because I can't imagine that happening).

  Good luck!

  Kosh

• How to allow connect to user only from specified ip addresses?

  Hello.
  How to allow connect to user only from specified ip addresses?
  For example,.
  User1 can connect only from 192.168.1.10
  User2 can only connect from 192.168.1.11
  and etc...
  Thank you.

  Web says:

  CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER "A1_AFTER_LOGON" AFTER LOGON ON DATABASE BEGIN
  IF UPPER(SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','IP_ADDRESS')) <> '192.168.1.10' THEN
  
  HOW TO FORBID ACCESS ????
  
  END IF;
  END;
  ALTER TRIGGER "A1_AFTER_LOGON" ENABLE
  

  How to deny access?

  Check the blog post that I've provided above

  RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20000, 'You don't have permission to login!');
  

• Public link connected from a sys user database

  people, pls aplogise me if this is a silly question...
  
  I create a public database link connected through "sys" username (sysdba role) on the source db
  
  I don't use 'connect to' clause and therefore connected default value 'sys' will be taken for the user connection
  
  sys users everywhere to the db of the source and target have the same password
  
  Now, when I query select * from dual@linkname
  
  of the source database, it does not work... Why?
  
  Also tried connecting from another user, same problem.
  
  Error returned:
  
  SQL > select * from dual@db4_jpnprd;
  Select * from dual@db4_jpnprd
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-01017: name of user and password invalid. connection refused
  ORA-02063: preceding the line of DB4_JPNPRD
  
  Please help... as it's quite urgent... thnx

  A public database link created with only the 'USING' clause and not the "CONNECT to...". IDENTIFIED BY... "provides the same username/password pair (SCOTT/TIGER in your example) exist in the remote database. Username and password must be the same.

• Why is-36 of Firefox on Windows receiving connections from DNS servers? Option network.dns.get - ttl

  Following update Firefox 36, my firewall was flooding asking me to allow external connections from the Internet to my browser. Looking at it more closely, Comodo Firewall indicates that external websites are trying to connect to Firefox, port 53 to an arbitrary port on my machine.

  If I disable the option FF36 new network.dns.get - ttl, it stops. I can't find any documentation or help on this option.

  Why Firefox do this? Is Comodo incorrect when he labels it as an external connection attempt? (It has normally been extremely good to differentiate the incoming and outgoing traffic). I guess that Firefox is trying to determine the TTL for DNS caching, but it is not make sense why DNS servers then try to connect to me.

  I am reluctant to create a firewall rule to that arbitrary Internet connections on my machine are OK as long as their origin on port 53, tips on how to manage all that this new feature is firmly States would be appreciated.

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Hi grammarye,

  Yes, you're right in thinking that Firefox is trying to find the TTL value. This is new in Firefox 36 behavior and was presented as services frequently changing DNS records (such as Cloudflare) were not working properly for Firefox users.

  Firefox makes asynchronous DNS searches - which means it will make a DNS query and then proceed to perform another task instead of waiting for an answer.

  Your ISP DNS server puts in cache only TTL an area for a short time, so if it does not the current LIFE expectancy, he will interview with other DNS servers to find.

  IANAE, but probably what is happening is:

  1. Firefox tries to find the DNS record for the domain that you want to connect to
  2. Your ISP DNS server does not have the current LIFE expectancy, then connects with other DNS servers to find
  3. During this time, Firefox lingers with something else
  4. DNS server, then reconnects to give you full DNS, including the TTL check
  5. Comodo sees the packets of the DNS server and panic

  I completely agree that arbitrary ports of white list is a bad idea, but in this case, the behavior is completely harmless.

  You can want to whitelist Firefox in your Comodo Firewall, or continue to let network.dns.get - disabled ttl.

  (edited to fix broken links and add a sentence)

• servermgr validation of connection from 0: 100000

  Hello.

  Get flooded with messages in my journal... Everything works well, as far as I can tell. Just curious as to what these means.

  We had some DNS problems, but they all seems to be resolved and all services are running in the event of a problem.

  Thanks for all the ideas.

  OSX Yosemite

  Server 5 latest version

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 550 serveradmin [95773]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 551 servermgr_accounts [95601]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 565 serveradmin [95774]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 567 servermgr_accounts [95601]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 568 servermgr_accounts [95601]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 591 serveradmin [95775]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 592 servermgr_afp [95604]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 608 serveradmin [95776]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 609 servermgr_afp [95604]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 611 servermgr_afp [95604]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 630 serveradmin [95777]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 631 servermgr_caching [95606]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 647 serveradmin [95778]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 648 servermgr_caching [95606]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 658 servermgr_caching [95606]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 678 serveradmin [95779]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 680 servermgr_devicemgr [10315]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 698 serveradmin [95780]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 699 servermgr_devicemgr [10315]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 721 serveradmin [95781]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 722 servermgr_dirserv [95609]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 926 serveradmin [95793]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 927 servermgr_dirserv [95609]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, servermgr_dirserv 929 [95609]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 948 serveradmin [95794]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 949 servermgr_dns [95622]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 966 serveradmin [95795]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 968 servermgr_dns [95622]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 969 servermgr_dns [95622]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, 989 serveradmin [95796]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:01, servermgr_ftp 990 [95624]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 005 serveradmin [95797]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, servermgr_ftp 007 [95624]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 017 servermgr_ftp [95624]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 036 serveradmin [95798]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02: servermgr_info 037 [95626]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 058 serveradmin [95799]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, servermgr_info 059 [95626]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 060 servermgr_certs [10138]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 291 serveradmin [95800]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, servermgr_jabber 293 [95628]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 328 serveradmin [95802]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 329 servermgr_jabber [95628]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, servermgr_jabber 359 [95628]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 382 serveradmin [95804]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 383 servermgr_network [95632]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:02, 408 serveradmin [95805]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:02: servermgr_network 409 [95632]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03: servermgr_network 549 [95632]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 571 serveradmin [95806]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 573 servermgr_nfs [95634]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 588 serveradmin [95807]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 589 servermgr_nfs [95634]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 618 servermgr_nfs [95634]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 639 serveradmin [95809]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 640 servermgr_radius [95637]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 733 serveradmin [95813]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 735 servermgr_radius [95637]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 737 servermgr_radius [95637]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 756 serveradmin [95814]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 758 servermgr_san [95650]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 772 serveradmin [95815]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03: servermgr_san 773 [95650]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 774 servermgr_san [95650]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 795 serveradmin [95816]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 796 servermgr_sharing [95652]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 817 serveradmin [95817]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 818 servermgr_sharing [95652]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 828 servermgr_sharing [95652]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 847 serveradmin [95818]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 848 servermgr_smb [95654]: 0 connection validation: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 863 serveradmin [95819]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 865 servermgr_smb [95654]: 0 connection validation: 100000

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 865 servermgr_smb [95654]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 885 serveradmin [95820]: connected to the notification Service

  2015-12-25 10:02:03, 886 servermgr_swupdate [95656]: 0 connection validation: 100000

  I get them as well on a clean installed El Capitan + OS X Server (10.11.2 + 5.0.15) system.

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_wiki Server [16649]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_web Server [16698]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_swupdate Server [16697]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_devicemgr Server [16696]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_jabber Server [16699]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_san Server [16778]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_mail Server [362]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_dirserv Server [16779]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_documents Server [16780]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_radius Server [16781]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:16:44 servermgr_vpn Server [16782]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:17 serveradmin Server [16795]: connected to the notification Service

  Dec 28 09:17 Server servermgr_mail [362]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  Dec 28 09:17:48 certadmin Server [16843]: connected to the notification Service

  Dec 28 09:17:48 servermgr_certs Server [16642]: validate the connection from 0: 100000

  The server has been very carefully the correct installation with very attentive to the DNS, etc. of valid certificates. Since the install I have reviewed all the settings and looking at the newspapers. I did all the services - not wiki, web, Messaging [jabber], san - active, but it seems to have them running and talk with the Server Manager.

  My server is running OK with services I active, so I hope it's just cruft.

• There are other users connected to your system, you still want to close?

  Hello

  I use Microsoft for MSDos operating systems and have never encountered a problem like this. I have Windows XP on one of my systems - all the other PC in my family have Windows 7 installed on it. When I shud down my Windows XP system, I get the message "another user connected to your system, you always want to stop there?". I installed all the Windows 7 systems on all family systems and Windows XP Professional I am writing on the subject. There is that one account on this Windows XP system and nothing else existed. Security software, that I am running is Microsoft Security Essentials. I don't let just anybody use my system or never have what means the messge above. Were there a security breach? I do not know. Help, please. Thanking you.

  Kind regards

  Mr. V. Khambhaita

  E-mail address is removed from the privacy *.

  It is possible that one of your machines connected on a network share of this machine.
  The next time this happens, right-click on 'My computer' then -> 'Manage'-> System Tools-> Shared Folders-> Sessions.  See if a session is appear on this screen.

  HTH,
  JW

• Client VPN blocks inbound connections from remote desktop?

  I am running Vista x 64. To connect to a VPN Windows via the built-in VPN client works except that it seems that all incoming connections from the local network (including remote desktop) are blocked.

  Is this a known problem or design? It is a problem for us because the computer that is running the VPN client is a virtual machine running in hyper-v, so accessible by users via remote desktop - only connection to the console of the hyper-v Server is not an option.

  Are there alternatives?

  I am running Vista x 64. To connect to a VPN Windows via the built-in VPN client works except that it seems that all incoming connections from the local network (including remote desktop) are blocked.

  Is this a known problem or design? It is a problem for us because the computer that is running the VPN client is a virtual machine running in hyper-v, so accessible by users via remote desktop - only connection to the console of the hyper-v Server is not an option.

  Are there alternatives?

  It sounds like the question to split the tunnel . On the VPN client you can enable/disable split tunneling. See this article for help with that.

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb878117.aspx

  Note the security ramifications...

  In addition, I can not comment on this issue and a virtual machine, so as always YMMV...
  MS - MVP Windows Desktop Experience, "when everything has failed, read the operating instructions.

• RDP to connect from an external PC

  Small domain with Windows Server 2012.  Several users connect to their work PC when it is off site.  Usually, I have no problem with setting this up for them.

  About 4 to 6 weeks ago a user bought a new Dell OptiPlex, Windows 7 PC for home use.  It runs Windows 7 Pro.  I implemented a RDP connection to his work PC and tested at home, as I usually do, to make sure it works OK.  I sent him the link and it fails to connect.  I won his personal PC and tested.  No luck at all.  I changed the setting of firewall - I even completely its firewall, temporarily disabled.  I am sure that the RDP connection is implemented, as I have copied from my own PC, it runs OK.

  Any thoughts, please?

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum
  
  
  If you give us a link to the new thread we can point to some resources it

• ACS 4.0 new administration users connect.

  We just migrated to 3.3 something to 4.0 a few weeks ago. The old system, we had two administrative users: administrator (from right) and hd (with the rights to see registered users and failed attempts). After the conversion and moving to a new server, which works perfectly, user administrator has worked. However, the hd user gets a "connection failed" whenever someone tries to connect, even with a good password. (I have reset the password to things easy, I removed the password, etc.).

  Also, if I change the hd user and click on "Grant All" to access, hd can connect. I tried through the elements a little at a time to see if there is one that can be turned on and let it work, but have not found one and it is a lot of time to go through one of the attributes at the same time, disconnect and reconnect you to solve problems. This happens with a brand new administrator as well - if it has not obtained all rights, he cannot og in.

  The administration audit log is not very useful, registration only:

  24/05/2006 10:36:26 - SECURITY - 192.168.11.95 administrator 'hd' connection failed.

  This worked fine before the upgrade, allowing the assistance of members of the Bureau check which were used on which machines (VPN or dial), and why they did not comply if it was.

  Is this a bug?

  Hi rich,

  I tried this in the laboratory and it works well (only failed attempts and connected users access) with ACS 4.0. I don't know if this is specific to an upgrade.

  BTW, have you tried to remove the 'hd' admin and add another admin using another name of user with rights to failure and registered users?

  How to add an admin without any privileges? Can he successfully connect?

  Obaid.

• notification when a vpn user connects or rear

  Is it possible to implement the ASA config so when a specific user logs in or out via the vpn client, an email is sent?

  You can distinguish the syslog message generated when the VPN authentication and send this message only by e-mail.

  You cannot, on the SAA itself, distinguish this message for a particular user and send notification of this user connection (AFAIK). You could probably send all connection events to a syslog server and then use it (with scripts) to send from the details of the events of the user.

• VBScript does not run in the Windows 7 Task Scheduler 'execute if user connected or not' is checked.

  I'm trying to run a vbs file using a batch file windows scheduled in the Task Scheduler in windows 7.  The vbs runs under the Scheduler if the option "run only when the user connects" is checked.

  When I go to 'Execute if user or not' task does not, either manually (by command file) or through the schedule.

  The vbs is a project of SAS Enterprise Guide.  These scripts, vbscripts worked in Windows XP.

  This is the vbscript code (I don't know anything about vbs, this is generated from SAS for EXAMPLE):

  Option Explicit
  Dim app

  Call to dowork

  "Stop the app
  Otherwise (app IsNot Nothing) then
  App. Quit smoking
  Set app = Nothing
  End If

  Sub dowork()
  On Error Resume Next
  '----
  "Start Enterprise Guide by using the name of the project
  '----
  Dim prjName
  Dim prjObject

  prjName = "------network patht\SQL_tst.egp" ' name of the project
       
  Set app = CreateObject ("SASEGObjectModel.Application.4.3")
  If Checkerror ("CreateObject") = True Then
  Exit Sub
  End If
     
  '-----
  "Open project".
  '-----
  Set prjObject = app. Open(prjName,"")
  If Checkerror ("app. Open") = True Then
  Exit Sub
  End If
     
         
  '-----
  ' run the project
  '-----
  prjObject.run
  If Checkerror ("Project.run") = True Then
  Exit Sub
  End If
     
             
  '-----
  ' Save the new project
  '-----
  prjObject.Save
  If Checkerror ("Project.Save") = True Then
  Exit Sub
  End If
     
  '-----
  "Close the project
  '-----
  prjObject.Close
  If Checkerror ("Project.Close") = True Then
  Exit Sub
  End If
        
  End Sub

  Function (fnName) Checkerror
  CheckError = False
     
  Dim strmsg
  Dim errNum
     
  If Err.Number <> 0 Then
  strMsg = "error #" & Hex (Err.Number) & + "\n" & "as" & fnName & + "\n" & Err.Description
  'MsgBox strmsg' Uncomment this line if you want to be notified via MessageBox to errors in the script.
  CheckError = True
  End If
          
  End Function

  Hello Carolyn111,

  I suggest that you post in TechNet in the official Scripting Guys Forum.
  Click on the link here to post your question. They would be better able to answer your question.

  Thank you

  Marilyn

• We look for details user for all users directly from Active Directory in a webcenter portal application?

  We look for details user for all users directly from Active Directory in a webcenter portal application?

  Hi again.

  Is not just WebCetnerDS in WebLogic... If it's a CustomPortal you had created a CustomPortalDS.

  You need to do a DB connection in your y JDeveloper Portal App than a link to the WebCenterDS schema.

  Deployment and testing of your WebCenter Portal: Application Framework - 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.7.0)

  Follow the links provided by Vinay on the WLST.

  Kind regards.

• Users connect in several sessions, even if they are not allowed to...

  Does anyone know what would cause the SAME user to log on multiple sessions even if we do not allow several connections in our environment from view?

  We've seen a lot with view 4.6.1 and sometimes with View 5.1.1.

  According to me, the question is the desktop VM is selected for the user by the broker is busy doing something (100% CPU) and Agent of the view in the virtual machine is unable to process the request of the broker in a timely. I believe that the broker gives up after a few seconds of no response from the officer and then selects another available office.

  So if the user disconnected from their office and then come back later, but their office has a blocked process in a loop and using 100% of CPU, the agent has a hard time getting back to the broker for the broker gives up and chooses another office.

  Desktop computers that we use are WinXP SP3 with 1 vCPU and 2 GB of ram.