Diagnosis of Norton reports that 'key performance or security patches' lack of Vista

Similar Questions

• Oracle RDBMS security patch reports

  Apart from the use of costly commercial vulnerability scanners, are there easy techniques to produce a user-friendly management report on what security patches are missing from a server Oracle 11 g? Or better still to produce a 'fully patched security' type assurance to management report.
  
  Could you provide some simple steps to make the report or management of a sample report?
  In addition, that excuse my ignorance, but I've heard systems administrators say that they often fall security patches from database that they refer, apply the hotfix could cause problems with the operation of the application, it's a legitimate concern or a load of nonsense? Have you ever applied a security patch that had an unfortunate knock on effect on the request which it gives life.
  
  Please keep simple answers to the DBA/management not friendly.

  Hello

  in my experience in customer support, I found that customers often confuse the severity of a vulnerability of security with the effects
  correction, for example a typical vulnerability would involve validating the incorrect settings, so it would be possible to abuse an API
  call to "do their thing", however well behaved applications never try to do more than documented, so for those the fix has zero effect.

  Also in my experience regressions are very rare and even more exceptional in patches of CPU, since they do not plan to change the
  feature but only to stop bad things or possible.

  The best practice is to catch up with the CPU patches (or power supply) as they are made available and do not fall too far behind, each time as Oracle
  emits an alert or quarterly a patch of CPU, there is a risk matrix that lists scores of vulnerability on a scale of 1 to 10
  detailing how he is this time for the CPU quarterly most people forget that it only lists the problems reported since the previous.
  then when they fall with wonder and patching, if the issue is serious enough to apply a patch for it, they forget to check
  the severity of all issues fixed since the last CPU they applied.

  The Advisor must simply apply these patches as soon as they are made available as they are low-risk and fix serious problems.

  To check which hotfixes are installed in household use of database: opatch lsinventory-patch, for example with the last power supply on 11.2.0.3 it looks like this:

  Patch 14727310 : applied on Wed Jan 16 08:11:22 THIS 2013
  Patch ID: 15663328
  Patch description: "Set update database: 11.2.0.3.5 (14727310).
  Created on December 27, 2012 00:06:30 hrs PST8PDT
  Sub -patch 14275605; "Game of the database update fixes: 11.2.0.3.4 (14275605).
  Sub -patch 13923374; "Game of the database update fixes: 11.2.0.3.3 (13923374).
  Sub -patch 13696216; "Game of the database update fixes: 11.2.0.3.2 (13696216).
  Sub -patch 13343438; "Game of the database update fixes: 11.2.0.3.1 (13343438).
  Bugs fixed:
  

  Inside the database, you can query the registry history $ for example (for the same database):

  SQL > set linesize 90
  set pagesize 100
  Select substr(action_time,1,30) action_time,
  substr(ID,1,8) id,
  substr action (action, 1, 10),
  version of substr (version, 1, 8),
  substr(BUNDLE_SERIES,1,6) BUNDLE_SERIES,
  substr (Comments, 1, 20) comments
  history of registry of $; SQL > SQL > 2 3 4 5 6 7

  ACTION_TIME ID ACTION VERSION
  -------------------- ---- -------- --------------------------------
  BUNDLE_SERIES COMMENTS
  ------------------------ ----------------------------------------
  10.21.11.5 17-SEP-11 0 TO APPLY 11.2.0.3
  95816 AM
  Group patches PSU 11.2.0.2.0

  JULY 6, 12 02.11.35.3 0 IS APPLIED 11.2.0.3
  33630:
  Group patches PSU 11.2.0.2.0

  20 NOVEMBER 12 04.55.45.3 4 TO APPLY 11.2.0.3
  98041 PM
  POWER SUPPLY PSU 11.2.0.3.4

  16 JANUARY 13 08.13.40.6 5 IS APPLIED 11.2.0.3
  13726 AM
  POWER SUPPLY PSU 11.2.0.3.5

  For more information, see:

  notes 821263.1 How confirm that an update critical Patch (CPU) has been installed on Linux / UNIX

  Greetings,

  Damage ten Monkshood

  Published by: hnapel on January 16, 2013 03:41

• Activation of Windows7 get error 0xc004c020 "the activation server reported that the Multiple Activation key has exceeded its limit."

  I installed Win7 Pro 64 - bit about 4 - 5 times with the same original key on the same computer, but now I have a problem; When I want to activate key, always error has occurred with this 0xC004C020 with description error Code: the activation server reported that the Multiple Activation key has exceeded its limit. How do I fix this problem?

  Hello

  Please find your resolution from this link: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff793399.aspx

  MAKs by design have a limited number of activations. Contact the Microsoft Activation call center.

  Hope that helps.

  Kind regards

  Joel

• "The activation server reported that the product key has exceeded its limit of unlocking". Error

  Hello

  I recently changed my motherboard and processor because my old card mother and fried CPU. I had Windows 8 Pro (64-bit) installed earlier, an upgrade to Windows 7 (64-bit). As soon as I started first of all, I got a notification asking me to re - activate my Windows but when I try to activate it with my original key, I get this error: "the activation server reported that the product key has exceeded its limit of unlocking".

  I tried to activate by phone, but instead connect to the automated system, I keep to redirect to voicemail after a few rings. Can someone help me to activate my Windows again? I'm in Karachi, Pakistan.

  The report shows that it is been activated previously, but that the material has changed considerably since the activation - hence the request for reactivation.

  Not too surprising if you traded motherboards. :))

  Telephone activation is definitely the way to go - but it's in the lap of the gods (i.. activation e. operator the MS) as to if they will allow it if the original Win7 installation was an OEM.

  My belief is that they will allow him - of some people hold that they will not :)

• Bad performance on the reports that were migrated from 6i to 10g

  We 6i migration client server to the report server in 10g and mediocre performance on various reports. Reports that work in seconds in 6i take much more time to run or even time out.
  
  Report server:
  Version 10.1.2.0.2
  initEngine = 1
  maxEngine = 20
  minEngine = 1
  engLife = 1
  engLife = 1
  maxIdle = 30
  
  The reports are called forms of 10 g with the following:
  T_repstr: = '... rwservlet/reports /? Server = rep_aporaapp_frhome1'
  || '& report =' | T_prog_name
  || '& userid =' | T_nds_uid;
  || '& destype = cache'
  || ' & paramform = 'yes '.
  || "& mode = default '"
  || '& desformat = pdf'
  "|' orientation = landscape."
  Web.show_document (T_repstr, '_blank');

  The use of these and have not heard a lot of bad

  Init 1 engine
  Engine max 6
  Engine min 0
  Eng life 10
  MaxIdle 30
  Spot an error
  Replacement of the trace

  I put my report server settings

  SIZE OF CACHE - 700
  CACHE DIRECTORY = (you decide)
  Timeout 120
  Max 120 connections
  The size of the queue Max 4000
  trace options = trace_err
  trace_replace mode trace

• Firefox is up to date, but several sites report that it is not the latest version. What can I do about it?

  There are several sites that I connect to (Netflix, Amazon, Hello Firefox, etc.) who are reporting that I use an older version of Firefox. I'm versions 36.0 performer, who reports to be updated. I am at a loss.

  Hi, your useragent (information, the browser sends to websites to identify its version) - apparently by mistake - shows, you're on version 3 of firefox.
  Please refer to this article to reset the settings of the user agent in firefox: websites say that Firefox is obsolete or incompatible, even if it's the latest version

• security of Norton says that my google toolbar is infected with a virus and I can't move to a newer version, because it is not compatible with firefox 5 or newer, what should I do?

  In the menu tasks of my norton Security window, there is a place to check protection against vulnerabilities. One of the concerns that he has an infection in my toolbar on firefox. He suggests that the best way to resolve was made to upgrade to a new version og. google, because as the still there is apparently no problem for it. When I tried to upgrade to a new version of google to cancel the former an open window and told firefox or most recent is not compatible with it. They said that I should either download something from firefox to fix or connect with firefox. Ido know even where to start, not very informed on the problems of this kind. / your help would be very appreciated. What should I do?

  You can use firefox 3.6, which is old, but always taken in charge and course. However, the best solution is to renounce the use of Google Toolbar because Google no longer support this with firefox, mainly because he has little to offer.

  You can always google bookmark by copying in Firefox. Please take a look at

  • Is Google Toolbar is no longer compatible with Firefox - here's some alternatives < - clickable link.
    What can help with ideas and solutions.

  I hope that the Norton report, you make reference to simply says that your system has vulnerabilities, rather that he suffers from a real infection (or that he has treated or quarantined malware).

• I can't install antivirus software, because Windows XP reports that additional protector is installed, despite having removed the malware.

  I followed the instructions on bleepingcomputer.com as suggested and am trying to run a clean boot using msconfig to disable all startup programs and the non-microsoft services. reports of msconfig access denied error when you try to change a service.

  Suite McAfee was previously installed on this system, but is more work after that "Additional Guard" has appeared and has been uninstalled due to the failure of an attempt to reinstall. The McAfee software will not be installed successfully. AVG Free edition does not install because it indicates that the additional guard already is installled. I was able to run Malwarebytes Anti-malware to remove Additional Guard system and am unable to find any remaining files or registry keys. I scanned for rootkits, but was unable to find anything. What else could happen? More precisely:

  (1) what is causing access denied error in msconfig (I get this despite running as administrator in normal mode and safe).

  (2) If, if not in the registry, the false information on guard is running might be coming from?

  Let alone msconfig for the moment. To ensure that all references to McAfee are removed, use the removal tool.

  McAfee Removal Tool - http://service.mcafee.com/FAQDocument.aspx?id=TS100507
  Reboot after running the tool.

  If the malware is really out of the system, and you can't always install AVG after you run the McAfee removal tool, you can try to reset the Windows repository that keeps track of security programs you have installed.

  Start > run > cmd [OK]
  The command prompt opens. At the prompt, type:

  net stop winmgmt [Enter]
  [Answering the prompt Yes or no with 'Yes'. See the message on the stopping services].
  CD C:\Windows\System32\wbem [Enter]
  repository.old repository ren [Enter]

  Exit command prompt and restart the system. Try to install AVG again. If it fails, you will have to enter back to BleepingComputer to ensure that your malware has been removed really. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• How can I block my keyboard so when my cat button, the keys perform the functions? I have a lock on my computer so I need a password to sign, but I can't find any info on how to lock keyboard features in.

  How can I block my keyboard so when my cat button, the keys perform the functions? I have a lock on my computer so I need a password to sign, but I can't find any info on how to lock keyboard features in.

  A quick Google for "lock keyboard" raised a certain links that seem promising. Here's one of eHow that answers your questions to kitty:

  http://www.ehow.com/how_4925264_lock-keyboard.html MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Error code: 0xC004E002, the software licensing service reported that the license store contains data of the unstable after installing Windows updates.

  Original title: I installed a windows update and all of a sudden I can't connect to my computer using my password it says error data is unstable with microsoft

  It says the software licensing service reported that the license store contains inconsistent data.      I have a windows vista hp pavillian

  Code 0xC004E002

  Hi JillCollas,

  When you are in the display of error message you will get a support contact option once you click on it, it should open up Internet explorer. If you are able to open IE page, then follow the steps and see if it helps.

  a. Click Start and type cmd in the search box.

  b. right click on cmd and then click Run as administrator.

  c. at the command prompt, type the following commands and press ENTER:

  Type: net stop slsvc (it may ask you if you're sure, select Yes)

  Type: cd %windir%\ServiceProfiles\NetworkService\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\SoftwareLicensing

  Type: Rename tokens.bar tokens.dat

  Type: cd %windir%\system32

  Type: net start slsvc

  Type: cscript slmgr.vbs - FLIR (it may take time for this will be complete, please be patient)

  Reboot twice

  You may enter the product again key, and then activate.

  For more information, you can consult the following articles:

  Error 0xC004E002 during activation of Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008

  Activating Windows: Frequently asked questions

  Hope this information is useful.

• Windows is not activated error "The Software Licensing Service reported that the license evaluation failed with error 0xC004E003"

  OT: Windows is not activated

  PC Specs: -.

  Windows 7 ultimate 64 bit

  Intel 3rd gen i3 - 240 GHZ x 4

  Intel HD graphics card.

  Hello

  I have a very serious problem with my laptop. First of all, my laptop's HARD drive crashed, I bought a new one, then I installed ubuntu 14, as I have the installation disc, & then I downloaded Windows 7 one day before yesterday & then I installed on yesterday afternoon. Everything was fine, that the installation was successful

  USB drive but most shocking is error: invalid product key, when I entered and tried to activate it again once I've upgraded to windows 7 & part empty left product key & then I connected to internet & entered the product by typing key just today to activate in the search from the start menu & got the following error :

  --------------------------
  Error details
  ---------------------------
  The following information was found for this error:

  Code:

  0xC004E003

  Description:

  The Software Licensing Service reported that license evaluation failed.

  ---------------------------
  Ok
  ---------------------------

  When I received this laptop as a gift from my family, it has Windows 7 Home premium preinstalled, so I updated windows on my laptop to ultimate edition using Windows Anytime upgrade using the same product key that I use today to activate my Windows. Any body here has any fix on how to activate Windows?

  Thanks in advance.

  The key you are using is a key Acer OEM SLIC (installed at the factory of Acer) and you have an HP computer.

  SYSTEM >Hewlett-Packardlaptop HP G72

  Your key will not work to install Windows 7 Ultimate or use the Express Upgrade option.

  J W Stuart: http://www.pagestart.com

• SNMP and key performance indicators

  I have implemented SNMP card and sending traps.  When I create a KPI, which has a threshold critical, will be a generated SNMP trap when this threshold is exceeded?

  In vC Ops v5.8, would come from a SMART or CLASSIC type alert, depending on the type. You will need to just filter the emailFilter.xml according to the catch on SMTP, however SNMP is completely non-filtered, so you will get it by default. You can show abnormalities of type KPI in the alert widget as well.

  In vR v6 Ops, key performance indicators are specified in the policy, but you must create symptoms + alerts if alerts. Simple definition of KPI indicator in politics will place high important on these measures when calculated health + anomalies, but that's all as much as it works. Alerts will be generated only if you have symptoms and alerts. You can no longer show abnormalities in the alert widget. V6 takes emphasis away only anomalies and shifts the focus to the definition of the symptoms + alerts for performing more action on the environment.

• How can I adapt the decision XML report that comes with a warning event?

  Through the web determinations warning events can be used.
  
  To make visible warning events in the response following XML must be added to the XML query:
  
  < typ:show - events > true < / typ:show - events >
  
  
  
  When a warning event is present in the XML response I also get a report of decision with report-style = 'basic attributes.
  
  When many warning events are present in the output XML file, this has a negative impact on performance.
  
  It's the reason I'm looking for a possibility to delete or configure the standard decision report that comes with a warning event.
  
  Is this possible?

  You can make smaller decision reports by setting the "silent" or "Invisible" option on attributes (see 'Hide information in a record of decision' in http://docs.oracle.com/html/E38269_01/toc.htm the political Oracle © modelling User Guide)

  It's really the only option to change the records of decision.

  See you soon
  Frank

• On certain pages of Firefox gold lock is on, but the Norton toolbar does not indicate that the page is secure. On some, the opposite is true. Why is this?

  There are pages where I think that the page should be secure is starts with https:// and the lock however seems to show it's safe. However the Norton toolbar only indicates that the page is secure; It doesn't mean it's safe. Sometimes the lock is not displayed but the Norton toolbar says the page is secure. Most of the time the two indicators are okay, but I was wondering why there are moments where they are not.

  Hello! The question you have posted is really an interesting question. The following could be the reasons for this:

  • NORTON provides a security seal to the owners of Web sites. Sometimes these joints can be revoked or expire. That's when NORTON Security Toolbar will display it "Insecure". But the same site may use SSL, then Mozilla poster protection the golden padlock and identify as "Secure".
  • Sometimes, a site cannot use SSL, but to use Norton seals. While Mozilla identifies it as "Insecure" and Norton identifies as "Secure".

  Security measures could change the behavior of the different measures of protection. But as Mozilla checks the SSL certificate on the Web site (and not for any joints!), a better option would be to trust of the sites identified by the golden padlock, because it guarantees a total safety.

  We hope that these reasons would cause.

• I get requests to update Firefox, but Norton said that there is a problem

  I thought that Mozilla Firefox automatically updated itself when it is used. However, I constantly get a white
  Block bottom right of my screen telling me to click it to upgrade to a new version of Firefox.
  When I tried this Norton claims that there is a danger in doing that, so I'll stop.

  You probably downloaded the stub installer that needs to download additional files from the Mozilla server and some security software identifies this version as a threat.

  You can find the full version of the latest version of Firefox 24.0 in all languages and for all systems operating here:

  • http://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/all.html

  Download and save the complete Firefox installation program on the desktop and start the installation with a double click on the desktop icon.