display type def

Similar Questions

• How to display scrollbars on Type Def

  Dear programmers,

  Question:

  Does anyone know how to display scroll bars in a window of Type Def after that both have been disabled?

  Background:

  I have a several projects where the scroll bars do not appear on some Type definitions. It is possible that they may have been disabled by other programmers in the past. This prevent me to see big bouquets stored inside and I have to physically move the entire cluster which takes a long time. I can't find a way to reactivate them (assuming both have been disabled).

  You can reproduce my problem if you start with a new Type def...

  

  Disable the two scroll bars...

  

  After that the scroll bars disappeared, how do I return? Using the control properties > appearance window will not allow the user to customize the scroll bars, and is no longer a right click menu available because you have to click with the right button on the bar itself scrolling.

  For those who work for the glory, I can provide the !

  It's funny, I couldn't find a simple way to do it either!

  You can try this code snippet. Please backup your control before you run it. Just browse the constant path to the location of your command, then run.

  

• How to add or edit data in a file Type Def CTL?

  I'm learning the mode with the RIO evaluation package more recent fiscal year to "create a real-time Application.  I want to do something simple to change the function to output audio to produce waveforms that I do in addition to the included "ding" sounds "boing", etc..  I believe that (1) the data are contained in the SoundOptions.CTL file, and (2) I can use "export to Clipboard" to display the data in the existing table, and (3) in the Panel before the Type Def CTL, I can add a new element of the Enum.  My question: how to associate my new element an array of data new1D?  Or modify existing data to different waveforms?

  Thank you!

  JEB

  
  

• type def

  Trying to use and understand the strict type def and def/control type.  Thought I heard until I opened the Level.vi of Simulation-Tank delivered w Labview (2014).  On the front panel are two Boolean flags.  They have been modified to look like symbols of value (I guess) "ISA symbology.  If I understand type defs must be a file *.ctrl with the updated the boolean.  I can't find a.  How were these implementation to the management of both Boolean and still put in the Simulation-tank Level.vi.  I read what strict type def and def type are and think I understand.  What is control? and how it is used.  When I change mode in the def type edition and make a right click on the Boolean value, select "photo", it shows four photographs of the Boolean in 2 different States... ON/OFF/ON/OFF.  Why 4?  Why not just in MARKET.

  There are three options for custom controls: control and definition of Type strict definition of Type. Only the last two are related to a master copy. A custom control has no such connection; When it is placed on the front panel, it is independent. That's what you see in this example. If you don't need or want every instance of a control to update when you change the .ctl file, then you must use a control rather than a type definition.

  There are 4 States of image to Boolean values:, off the coast of the transition to and on the transition from Off to (I don't remember the order of the last two). This is useful when you want to display an image for the transition, for example while you hold the button of the mouse over the control.

• problem with the tab control type def

  Hello community,

  There is still much more to learn more about LabVIEW.

  I have a tab control which is a (non-strict) type definition. It has 5 tabs with indicators.

  When I open type def and insert another tab, say three position and close type def, the tab on my fp control will of course win the additional tab.

  But the new number three tab will contain this as the former number tab three content and only the last tab will be empty.

  This isn't what I wanted. I think that I am doing it wrong.

  Is it possible to get an empty tab posted on three without defeat the purpose of a def type (because obviously I could decouple the def of type control, insert the tab and do a new type def).

  Best regards

  Florian

  Florian,

  I hope that you will display the tab as a user interface control in one place. In this case, you can have a typedef enum to subVIs and disconnect the the typedef tab control.

  Thank you

  George S

• HP G62 b01ET: display types: System 67596881 disabled

  Help, please:

  Laptop of HP 2000 crashes after 3 attmpts to enter the administrator password!

  Display types: System off

  67596881

  Thanks in advacne!

  Hello

  Enter: 78494207

  Kind regards

  DP - K

• password type def

  Hi all

  I want to do a def type or type strict def (not sure that it would be) a password, so that is the password must be updated, I can just change the password in the type type def/strict def and the change will apply to all programs that use the constant/control of password?  How?  Thank you!

  Yik

  You could just put the constant (string) into a vi that has this, which could then be used everywhere. Change he would spread to all the places it is used. Or you could do a typedef is enum, recovery of control 'strings []' with a property node, for the comparison of your password. I put in form encrypted to a text file, read during the initialization of the program, which allows me to change without having to recompile the program. In many environments it is no such thing as a small change program, no recompilation, reconstruction, requires a rigorous new test/requalification to absolutely confirm that the functionality of the program has not changed. That's why I try to not hardcode the constants universal ones, like pi.

• Is it possible to open a control of type-def as string programmaticly combobox control, change it and then close by nodes invoke/property?

  This may sound crazy; but I was looking through methods and solution properties do the following:

  1. Open a cluster of type strict-def.
  
  
  2. Add an element in a chain of the Combobox control.
  
  
  3. Register the control.
  
  
  4. Close the type-def.

  LabVIEW provides the tools to do this within its broad range of pallets?

  Second step is easy, as long as the control or parent cluster is not a strict type def.

  G.R.

  It's tedious, but simple using the VI server / scripting.  First of all, make sure that the elements of additional scripts are enabled in the VI server options.  Now open the typedef as you would a VI.  In the scripts, a typedef is like a VI with no block diagram, only a front panel and control.  You can get a reference to the control that you need to change in one of the following two ways:

  1. Open its containers from top to bottom, using the reference container as the entrance to the owner for the opening of the new control.
  
  
  2. Use of the crosses in the script palette VI

  In all cases, after change it, save using recording method tools and you should be good to go.  The most difficult part is to get the reference to the control.  If you are having problems, let us know.

• Photo ring Type Def not updated

  I have a ring of photo type def.  I used it in an another vi.  At the time, the ring of photography has only 5 photos in there.  Later, I added another image to the ring of pic type def, but not a not updated of the vi.  Why is this?

  Given a ring of photo is just another type of ring, see if these appy son message

  Ring type constant def not updated for LabVIEW 2010 SP1

  strict type of ring bat bug?

  Strict Type def with Menu ring does not automatically update the related constants

• Can I use several type def enums in 1 VI?

  Is it possible to use several type def enums each has its own States? In the larger scope of things, I want to use it in a MANUAL.

  Thank you

  mhaque

  Of course, you can have several type def enums.  I don't know what you mean by "in 1 VI.  Each typedef enum will have its own .ctl file.

• Cluster Type def. array of cluster Type def vs. -best practices?

  Hi all, I'm creating a cluster which is used inside tables throughout my code, of course, I'll need to group and ungroup it several times. My question is:

  Which is preferable? Defining the type def as a cluster, and then add it to a table where it is needed? or by defining the type def as an array of this cluster? It seems to me that it would be preferable to define the type as cluster so def when you group or ungroup it you don't need to index the table first, right?

  Thank you

  Jose

  JMotaB wrote:

  Hi all, I'm creating a cluster which is used inside tables throughout my code, of course, I'll need to group and ungroup it several times. My question is:

  Which is preferable? Defining the type def as a cluster, and then add it to a table where it is needed? or by defining the type def as an array of this cluster? It seems to me that it would be preferable to define the def type as cluster then when you group or ungroup it you don't need to index the table first, no?

  Thank you

  Jose

  Agreed.

  I rarely type tables def but almos always type the cluster that I put in them.

  Ben

• Modification of the properties-type def drop-down list box

  I have a group of 32 cases of a def type. The def type contains several different types of control. What I have to do is to change the properties of the list box for each of the type defs. Normally, I would create an array of references to change the properties for each of the type defs, but when I try this I can not access the properties of string [] for combo box selections. The only way I found to fix it is to create a reference for each individual drop-down list box item. It is labour, since I'll have 32 elements. Is there a way to beeter to do this? The first screenshot shows the issui I'll have, not being able to change the properties of specific elements within each of the def type at runtime through a control [] array. The second screenshot shows the only solution I've found so far, which is not very practical.

  You will need to set up (for a more specific class) control to a type of combo box for the particular control [] index that has the combobox control if you want to access the drop-down list.

  You can also access the combobox in a cluster based directly, rigth click on the control reference and a link to the element cluster directly.

  The last option is to make the strictt of typdef will fill all instances with the channel list [] given that it is a strict property.

  the approach is based on the weather, you plan on changing the list during execution.

• LabVIEW FPGA. Where should I put the custom controls - or type defs in a project

  Hello

  Maybe this is a stupid question - but I'm a little confused on where within a project I should put the controls (or type defs) used in FPGA screws.  If you put in the bit "module FPGA" project, so they come up as "dependencies" - as if they are not in the project within the project when you read/write values in the target FPGA.  Also, it seems that if you copy the project to a different location folder then the FPGA vi can be distributed in a way that she needs to be recompiled - even if you don't change anything - that's not cool if it takes an hour or two to compile.

  I had the controls in the external project for awhile - but seems not ideal from the point of view modular programming, and also, it seems that it may also cause the recompilation unnessary - although perhaps less often that put them in the FPGA subproject.

  Any thoughts?

  I've seen the same behavior and it is a fact that the code must be recompiled if you move a project even if the FPGA code is unchanged. From my point of view, it's a real BUG. This is independent of any file source or target FPGA.

  The other point of your question is not clear relly. Of course, you will get the dependencies if you place the necessary files outside the structure of the target project. But I see no problem to reference them twice because it won't double the source itself. So I suggest to refer to these files several times in the project structure. Actually I'm doing this because I manage a project file LV with different targets CRIO where the complete code for the target FPGA is double referenced under each target.

  It may be useful

  Christian

• Enum (type def) - structure of the case called update error

  Hello

  1. One of my (type def) enums is not updated the names of structure cases. I found something that looks like a probable error in the case where the structure,
  2. I had created one of the constants in the enumeration before I did a typedef. Therefore, I made new constants since the typedef and replace the original ones. and still, the structure of the case is not being updated.

  How can I solve this?

  also, I have one state machine inside the other. Is this right way to program?

  

  Somewhere in your code, you have the wrong typedef, or don't replace a control by the typedef. Must not have replaced all. I don't know if there is an easy way to search for; You may need to go through anyway.

• How to place a (strict) reference of a cluster in a control of Type def?

  Example usage: for example queue message handler it is holding cluster of the references to the controls and lights on the front panel.

  

  I have a cluster of façade of type-def'ed, I need to add to this cluster of references.

  In the typedef for the controls on the front panel (above), I place a control refnum then
  Make a right click-> Select the class Vi Server-> generic-> GObject-> control->-> Cluster Cluster.

  However, this does not produce a typedef of strict type I need.

  How I handled this?

  I managed to place controls in the cluster of typedef of common simple types (numbers, strings, etc.) by placing a refnum control in the cluster and (for the reference of control chain)
  Make a right click-> Select the class Vi Server-> generic-> GObject-> control-> String-> String
  Think it works because they do not need to be strictly typed.

  Delete an instance of your cluster type def on the FP, then drag it to the referance.