Do more small Partition C: and D: to create


Advertisement


Tags: Lenovo Desktops

Similar Questions

  • Have two black stripes on the right and left of the screen making it my screen more small and does not know how to remove them permanently.

    Problem with the screen!  Have two black stripes on the right and left of the screen making it my screen more small and does not know how to remove them permanently.  Can someone help, please step by step details.  Thank you.  Have Windows7!

    Original title: screen

    Looks like a monitor / setting screen. Horizontal and vertical positions may need to be adjusted in the monitor buttons. Another possibility is that the display resolution is not optimal.

  • How can I edit a PDF file to have an expanded text box and more small margins?

    I just read a long discussion initiated by a guy who wanted to reconstruct a PDF file to print less pages. I do not ask this topic. I am aware that Acrobat 9 Pro will not recompose the pages in a PDF for you. as someone has said, it is not a word processing program. I want to copy a PDF file into a new file with an expanded text box and more small margins, so I can read it more easily. My view is not so great.

    I try to print a U.S. supreme court decision, for my study. The problem is that these PDF files of such decisions are composed of 10-points with generous margins, in pages of Folio-size smaller than 8 1/2 x 11 "." When you open PDFs of these decisions, you get the margins very broad and relatively small characters. Essentially, I would like to re-rasterize the document so it prints on my 8 1/2 x 11 "paper in a larger size of apparent type, but at the same high resolution as the original. Moreover, the decision that I'm getting is almost 200 pages long, so I won't do that, of course, in a page-by-page manner.

    I guess I could do it in Photoshop, in pages to blow and their culture. Photoshop does a good job of eliminating aliasing when you do this. But it seems to me better to re-rasterize pages of the source PDF file. If any player would be nice enough to explain this process? (I'm fairly warned in Photoshop, Illustrator and printer of computing concepts, but a complete newb in Acrobat).

    If you want just this for printing, one thing you can easily do is to crop all pages to remove the margins. For example, you can RP 2 "on the left and right sides, and 1.5" off the top and bottom. Then print using a Scaling of the Page to "adapt to the printable area.

    To crop in Acrobat 9, select: Document > Pages of culture

    Be sure to select all for the page range.

  • with a big hd, 1.5 to, it would be preferable to have a c small partition for the system

    with a big hd, 1.5 to, it would be preferable to have a small 1 to partion the system, I was advised to go and the other, I do not know which one to choose, I would prefer 1 c drive with all the system and data together.

    I remember with windows 3 it was a good idea to have a small c drive, but I thought we are further down the road, but I'd like to help appraiate

    Windows 7 works best when it is installed on a single partition with the programs installed on the same partition.  More a partition requires additional seek time and results in poor performance.

  • Why HP only allow more big hard drives and SSD when restoring Images of original & software OS system?

    8.1 Windows recently damaged my PC h8-1559 (still under warranty). All was not if badly grown f11 empty blue screen and boot BSOD loop was the only thing besides the BIOS that I could see. I must have spent days trying to get Win 8 on my SSD after you purchase this month of PC. Now I have to restore PC to original specifications and again migrate the OS back to SSD. Not really a problem I expect no support, given how much anti-'customize' computers became under software and hardware developers who blame or place the responsibility on each other for the most part.

    I just want to know:

    That HP decided smaller HDD and SSD should never be allowed to use the pre-built PCs and why? More importantly, why has it remained for many years after many complaints over the years? Thank you.

    Hey Hastatus

    I can understand your frustration, but the smaller reader that works is 160 GB. The way the image is put on the disk and extended requires a lot of partitions and each of them is created to a certain height, these sizes were decided before the SSD, and when disk space was not that great, a case, but it was arbitrary. As SSD became more popular and used in some of our systems we made some special changes in plants in order to allow a 60 GB drive to use. But the changes were not made to any other builds, there was not only considered.

    As SSD became more popular, they are also grew in size, so the decision was made to leave the requirement of 160 GB. It's not a way to go back and change to the older, but we will spend this feedback to our engineering teams.

    Bottom line - usable - more small disk 160 GB regardless of the type (HDD or SSD).

    Sorry not information just solution.

    Bill

  • problem with prevention card boot partition after partition, bootcamp and change table card

    Hello

    I tried to install windows using bootcamp on my macbook pro 2011, however I messed up with my partition table card, and now I'm not able to start my mac os, disk utility cannot repair my disc and I have no back up. I really need my data. I am able to start under GParted and use gdisk, how do I fix back the plan of partition table so that I can start, back to my Mac OSx.

    Thank you

    -bash-3, 2 # fdisk/dev/disk0

    Disk: geometry / dev/disk0: 60801/255/63 [976773168 sectors]

    Signature: 0xAA55

    From end

    #: cyl hd s - cyl hd s id [Start - size]

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1: EA 1023 254 63 - 1023 254 63 [1-976773167] < unknown ID >

    02:00 0 0 0-0 0 0 [0-0] unused

    03:00 0 0 0-0 0 0 [0-0] unused

    04:00 0 0 0-0 0 0 [0-0] unused

    -bash-3, 2 #.

    -bash-# 3.2 diskutil list

    / dev/disk0

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: GUID_partition_scheme * GB 500,1 disk0

    1: EFI 209,7 Mo disk0s1

    2: Apple_CoreStorage GB 372,0 disk0s2

    3: disk0s3 Apple_Boot Boot OS X 650.0 MB

    4: Apple_HFS 127.1 Untitled GB disk0s4

    / dev/disk1

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Apple_partition_scheme * 1.4 GB disk1

    1: Apple_partition_map disk1s1 30.7 KB

    2: Apple_Driver_ATAPI disk1s2 2.0 KB

    3: Apple_HFS Mac OS X based system 1.4 GB disk1s3

    / dev/disk2

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * disk2 524,3 KB

    / dev/disk3

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * DIS3 524,3 KB

    / dev/disk4

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * disk4 524,3 KB

    / dev/disk5

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * disk5 524,3 KB

    / dev/disk6

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * disk6 524,3 KB

    / dev/disk7

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * 6.3 MB disk7

    / dev/disk8

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: without title * 2. 1 MB disk8

    / dev/disk9

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * disk9 1. 0 MB

    / dev/disk10

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * disk10 524,3 KB

    / dev/disk11

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * disk11 524,3 KB

    / dev/disk12

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Untitled * disk12 1. 0 MB

    / dev/disk13

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: FDisk_partition_scheme * disk13 2.1 GB

    1: disk13s1 DOS_FAT_32 MYLINUXLIVE 2.1 GB

    / dev/disk14

    #: NAME SIZE TYPE IDENTIFIER

    0: Apple_HFS MacintoshHD * 371,7 GB disk14

    -bash-3, 2 #.

    -bash-3, 2 #.

    -bash-3, 2 # fdisk

    use: fdisk [-d] [-mbrboot f] [-c cyl head s - h sect] [s size] [-r] [-style] drive

    -i: initialize disk with new MBR

    -sup: update MBR code, table partition to preserve

    -e: Edit mbr disk interactively

    -f: specify non-standard model of MBR

    -chs: specify the geometry of the disk

    S: specify the size of the disk

    r: read about the partition from stdin (implies - i).

    -a: auto-partition with the given style

    -the partition d: dump table

    y: don't ask questions

    -t: test if the drive is partitioned

    'disc' is of the form/dev/rdisk0.

    auto-partition styles:

    boothfs 8Mb boot more HFS + partition (default) root

    entire disc HFS as a HFS partition.

    disk full back like a DOS partition

    entire disk RAID as a partition 0xAC

    -bash-# GPT - r 3.2 show the/dev/disk0

    See the TPG: could not open device 'l': no such file or directory

    start index size summary

    0 1 PMBR

    1 1 Pri GPT header

    2 32 table GPT Pri

    34 6

    40 409600 1 part TPG - C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B

    409640 726609000 2 part TPG - 53746F72-6167-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC

    727018640 1269536 3 part TPG - 426F6F74-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC

    728288176 248222808 4 part TPG - 48465300-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC

    262151 976510984

    976773135 32 table dry GPT

    976773167 1 dry GPT header

  • My policy changed completely after the last update of Firefox. It's a little smaller, less fat and much less clear. Please tell me how to solve this problem.

    The default font used on sites like Facebook, Craigslist, Google etc. has become much worse since the last update. It is much less clear, looks almost like a chop and transparent. As if the part of the letters missing. Less "BOLD" and a little bit more smaller institutions. I would like to go back to the way in which the police used to look like, the way it does in Internet Explorer and Chrome.

    Hi miked91, this is probably caused by kb3013455 of update from microsoft that can cause problems of rendering fonts on vista:

    After you have installed the 3013455 security update, you may notice a degradation in quality of text in some scenarios. The problem occurs only on systems running Windows Vista SP2 or Windows Server 2003 SP2. Microsoft is researching this problem and will post more information in this article when the information becomes available.

    Reference: https://support.microsoft.com/kb/3013455

    an option may be to tackle this particular update for now until there is a fix from microsoft or you could also look at if there is a graphics driver update available on the Web site of the seller (intel/amd/nvidia) which could also be solved this problem in some cases.

  • Satellite A660 - 11 M - Possible to get more small/more lightweight charger?

    Very satisfied with my new A660 - 11 M, but find the charger (V85) to be almost too big/heavy to be portable. Its a minus 3 times the size of my old notebook charger (which admittedly gave only half of the current).

    The A660 relatively short battery life means I almost always win the my cell phone charger. No clue on the question of whether a more small/more light charger is available?

    > but find the charger (V85) to be almost too big/heavy to be portable

    My charger a500 is also great in comparison with other models like Asus, Hp, dell. You should contact the Asp (SAV) and ask them if you can get less size AC adapter

  • cluster with images: memory increases up to more than 2 GB and crashes

    I have a lot of PNG images (around 1200, 12 MB in size) and I load by programming in labview with a loop for I put all the image data in a table for all images.

    I can't complete this operation, while the images are very small memory LV is increasing more than 2 GB and then I get a memory error output.

    I put one "structure" above all table operations. What is going on? IM really a bad thing, I guess.

    Hi, Faust,.

    "On the qualities of the picture, they are 32-bit and x 850 360 pixels BUT about 99% is transparant (images has a constant size which is transparant, there is a small object that moves in this space)."

    Transparency is not relevant in terms of memory occupation. When the image loads, it just needs 850 * 360 * 4 bytes (or ~1.2 MB)...

    Suggestion:

    -Do not store images in memory... Do the math in slices of (say) 100 photos.

    -Do some manipulation of the image to get the position of the moving object. Then you store only a small portion of the image (with the object) and some information about the location in the picture. In this way, you always know the size of the (original) photo, but you only keep the "interesting" part in memory!

  • Why is the size of the Web page to get more small or bigger while I'm online? Am I touch a button or by pressing something by accident?

    Why is the size of the Web page to get more small or bigger while I'm online? Am I touch a button or by pressing something by accident? This happens to my daughter. We have all two computers laptops sony vaio. Does anyone else have this problem? Is there a way to avoid this?

    It is possible that one of the CTRL on your keyboard is blocked by sticky dirt coke or a faulty design on this model since it happens on 2 different Laptops:
    If you use the mouse wheel to scroll up and down your pages in Internet Explorer, CTRL + roulette is a shortcut for zoom, what would cause this symptom.

    The Vaio seems to use a complex configuration of the main keyboard drivers, search the Web for "sony vaio ctrl key pressed" to see some of these horror stories and how others solved the problem. Add your specific Vaio model name to the search string for more accurate results.
    Also check if the function FN keys work correctly, go to the Sony web site to check the driver for your model and Windows 7 updates.

    If you need to clean the keyboard, I suggest that you seek professional help.

  • merging layers makes more small png images?

    Hello:

    I have a Windows 8 and I use Photoshop CC - the most recent update.

    I'm curious about something and can't seem to find an answer...

    Merged layers before saving the image for the web mark the file size more small?

    Or is - not important how many layers (open) the image has when comes time to save it for the web?

    I thank very you much for your time.

    If you group before you save it to the web you loos your layers, your work.  If you use save for web or save an image file in a file format that does not support layers such as Jpeg and PNG. Photoshop will temporary flatten the depth of color change of current of 8 bits if you need document be, possibly convert to sRGB color space then encode images in the file format wished to record, write the file, then restore your document to the State it was before you did save it for web or save as.  You can then keep you work by saving the document in a file format that supports layers, PSD, PSB or Tiff.

  • Partitioned Tables and indexes

    Hello


    I have a question on the table and index partitioning. My scenario is:

    Charge 2 mio records in table T once a month. Loaded records are added to existing records, and once loaded data is never changed.
    At some point, I want to delete the older recordings, so I intend to this partition table.

    T table looks like:
    create table t (id       number(10) not null  constraint t_pk primary key,
                    period   number(10) not null,
                    contract number(10) not null,
                    attr     number(10) not null);
    
    create unique index t_ux1 on t(contract,period);
    
    create index t_ix2 on t(period);
    My plan is to partition T over the period, and I'm trying to read through the concepts
    http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/partconc.htm#g471747


    My question is now, how to manage the indexes, the t_pk, the t_ux1 and the t_ix2. Concepts of say,

    «1. If the table partitioning column is a subset of index keys, use a local index.»

    "2. If the index is unique, use a global index. If this is the case, you are finished. »


    So, that's how I read it
    -t_pk is unique, so this should be global
    -t_ux1 of columns is a subset, unless I have misunderstood (?), which should be local
    -index t_ix2 column is the same as the partitioning column, so it must be local

    Is this right, this t_ux1 should be a local partioned index, even if the period is the second column in the index?

    If true, what will happen when a partion fell?


    I am new in this area, so please feel the comment as you wish.


    Concerning
    Peter


    BANNER
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Oracle Database 10 g Enterprise Edition release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
    CORE Production 10.2.0.3.0
    AMT for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production

    Peter Gjelstrup wrote:

    My question is now, how to manage the indexes, the t_pk, the t_ux1 and the t_ix2. Concepts of say,

    «1. If the table partitioning column is a subset of index keys, use a local index.»

    "2. If the index is unique, use a global index. If this is the case, you are finished. »

    So, that's how I read it
    -t_pk is unique, so this should be global
    -t_ux1 of columns is a subset, unless I have misunderstood (?), which should be local
    -index t_ix2 column is the same as the partitioning column, so it must be local

    Is this right, this t_ux1 should be a local partioned index, even if the period is the second column in the index?

    A partitioned index locally can only be defined as unique if the partition key is part of the columns in the index. Imagine what the database would have to do if this is not the case: in order to verify if a newly added or updated value violates the uniqueness, it will have to travel all the partitions in a serialized operation - means that no one else could do the same thing at the same time. Since he is a killer of serious scalability in terms of locking and contention, this is not allowed.

    So: Your T_UX1 index can be defined as a unique index that is local because it contains the partition key. Although the index is not prefixed ("Prefix" means that it is divided by the left side of the columns in the index) which means that there may be access patterns where all partitions should be scanned or the optimizer cannot use a method of size of effective partition according to the way the index is reached.

    Your T_PK index cannot be set as local because it must be unique (you can not use a local non-unique index in this case), but does not contain your partition key. It must be a global index. An overall index can be partitioned as well (different from the underlying table) but it doesn't have to be.

    Depends on how you access your data you have not T_IX2 index when partitioning by this key because it corresponds to the partition key and therefore could not actually be used by the mechanism of partition pruning that limit your query to the scores of individuals.

    If you have more than one MAS environment where running queries are used longer, you should be fine with the index the in general (because they could be analyzed in parallel in parallel operations), but if you have an OLTP environment, then you should avoid local no prefix indexes due to the potential problem that you need to analyze all partitions.

    Be borne in mind that with partitioning adds an important layer of complexity to other areas: in particular the options available to the optimizer and analyze cost optimizer statistics. Depends on how you access your statistical data must be maintained on several levels now (level of score and at the global level, in the case of subpartitioning may be still at this level). If your data is important and you rely on "global" level statistics (these are always the case when the optimizer at the time analysis cannot limit access to a single partition) then in the pre - 11 g databases analyze these "global" level statistics can take a lot of time and resources, since actually , you need data several times (once for the partition and even global level).

    Presenting this partitioning may mean other potential problems in terms of execution that change (not for the better sometimes) plans and how to effectively collect statistics. Note that g 11 addresses the issue of 'statistics' by introducing the so-called "extra" global statistics. Greg Rahn wrote a [blog note | http://structureddata.org/2008/07/16/oracle-11g-incremental-global-statistics-on-partitioned-tables/] on this nice feature.

    >

    If true, what will happen when a partion fell?

    Since you're already on 10g, you can specify the database to update the scores of the local index using the UPDATE of the INDEX clause, while 9i could maintain only an overall index and it is up to you to rebuild the local index partitions after the partition DDL on the table (according to the DDL operation).

    Kind regards
    Randolf

    Oracle related blog stuff:
    http://Oracle-Randolf.blogspot.com/

    SQLTools ++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676 /.
    http://sourceforge.NET/projects/SQLT-pp/

    Published by: Randolf Geist on Sep 30, 2008 16:39

    Added statistics / optimizer warning when you use the partitioning

  • IOS 10 makes your iphone 6 more battery drain faster and feel hot

    iOS 10 makes my iPhone 6 more battery drain faster and feel hot. Even charge my phone because my phone warm. I charged my phone three times per day.
    It is the case for all the iPhone 6 as well as holders with iOS10?

    Every since going to iOS10, my 6 s more drains much faster - even after doing a factory reset.

    I used to get 7 to 10 hours before hitting 40% when the iOS9

  • After downloading the update for Yosemite 10.10.5, I got an annoying popup with a beep sound blaring that says that Safari crashed. I've forced to leave Safari, rebooted and popup returned once more. Restarted again and popup went. What was it?

    After downloading the update for Yosemite 10.10.5, I got an annoying popup with a beep sound blaring that says that Safari crashed. I've forced to leave Safari, rebooted and popup returned once more. Restarted again and popup went. What was it?

    Open Safari while holding the SHIFT key

    Try to reset the settings of Safari:

    1. open Safari

    2. click on the Safari menu at the top (to the right of the Apple logo)

    3. Select the Preferences/Privacy tab

    4. click on remove all data from the Web site

    5. close Safari.

    Remove cache Safari files:

    1. click on finder

    2. look for the menu GO to top

    3. click on GO and hold down the option key. This will show a user library folder.

    4. click library and find the Caches folder

    5. in the folder caches com.apple.Safari Ouvrezledossier

    6. move the Cache.db file Trash.

    This should solve the problem. If it does not help, try to disable the Safari extensions

    1. open Safari

    2. click on the Safari menu at the top (to the right of the Apple logo)

    3. Select Preferences

    4. find the Extensions tab

    5 disable all extensions of

    6. relaunch Safari

  • Hi, I have problem im my Iphon 6 more are the focus and the image blurred whan im shooting what to do?

    Hi, I have problem in my IPhone 6 more is the focus and blurry image when turn what to do?

    for example, please find the attachment.

    Thank you...

    First check if your iPhone is eligible or not: https://www.apple.com/support/iphone6plus-isightcamera/

    and if your iPhone is not affected, so go here: get help with the camera on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support

Maybe you are looking for