Dynamic VPN for a SAA with IP tunnel

Similar Questions

• Make a Table of the dynamic contents for a document with a liquid layout... Help!

  * Running LiveCycle ES4 and use of the 'action' to code generator *.

  I have a HUGE document (70 + pages) that needs a dynamic table of content that updates the user adds information that can push all the sections that follow to the new page numbers.  There are sections AND subsections under each article, but for this, lets keep things simple and just talk sections.  I had to face to find a way to do this for months and I need to have done this week. I already have the table of contents and click on each section heading, it sets the focus to the PDF for the first text field in this section.  (each section has a text field just after the title of section)

  
  

  To make it dynamic, I added 2 pieces for each section:

  (1) a field of visible text on the Table of contents page with the default page number that the article is on until the user enters information

  2) an invisible digital field placed just before the first text field in each section that of value is set on "property page number: current runtime" so he always holds the current page number

  
  

  Using the constructor Action, what I do is every time a textfield is changed, change the value of the table visible from the field content of this section to the value of the invisible digital field that is now the current page number.  There are 7 sections, so if the text of article 2 field is changed, then update the Table of contents to sections 3-7.

  
  

  

  
  

  When I tested on a single article, it worked.  But now it does not work and I do not know why.

  
  

  Here are some properties of the object than my being at the origin of the problems too. If anything sticks?

  
  

  Visible box on the table of contents page

  Domain: Type = text field

  Value: Type = Protected (I was cycling through all THE different types, but the only time where it worked, it was the Type of value)

  
  

  Invisible box above the first textfield in each section

  Domain: Type = numeric field

  Value: Type = calculated - read-only property of execution: current Page number

  
  

  any suggestions? Thank you!
  

  This has never answered, but I understand on mine.  Figured since it had 66 times, I would like to share what I found.  It was actually an easy fix.

  I added a textfield (set to display the current page number of the page on which it is) at the beginning of each section that appears in the table of contents and set it to always stay with the first line of text in this section as well as the document grew, the page number, in that the section begins will remain correct.  Place to hide it.  In the "binding" tab, I put the name is the same name as the corresponding heading in the table of contents.

  Hope this helps someone who is in my place last year. =)

• Inspection of traffic between hair-pinning VPN on a SAA with AIP SSM.

  Hello

  I want to deploy an ASA as a VPN endpoint and to use the AIP SSM module to inspect and provide protection for inbound traffic arriving on a VPN and start on another within the same ASA. I guess it's possible because traffic is unencrypted in the ASA State and must be intercepted by the class plan. Anyone who has done this or can anyone confirm that this will work?

  Thank you very much

  Wil Bowes

  If the ASA finishes the VPN, then indeed it can also inspect internally. The decryption happens before "module controls" for inbound traffic and the arrival of "control module" before encryption for outgoing traffic. If you can do it.

  I hope it helps.

  PK

• Easy VPN with the Tunnel Interface virtual IPSec dynamic

  Hi all

  I configured easy vpn remote on a cisco 1841 and dynamic server easy vpn with virtual tunnel interface on the server (cisco 7200, 12.4.15T14)

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6635/prod_white_paper0900aecd803645b5.html

  It works with easy vpn remote to the client mode and mode network-extesión, but it doesn't seem to work when I configure mode plus network on the client of the cpe, or when I try to have TWO inside the ez crypto interfaces. On the customer's site, I see two associations of security, but on the server PE site only security SA!

  Without virtual dynamic tunnel interface, dynamic map configuration is ok... This is a limitation of the virtual tunnnel dynamic interface?

  Federica

  If one side is DVTI and the other uses a dynamic map, it does support only 1 SA. If the two end uses DVTI or the two end uses dynamic card then it supports several SAs.

  Here is the note of documentation for your reference:

  Note: Multiple inside interfaces are supported only when the Cisco Easy VPN server and the Cisco Easy VPN client have the same type of Easy VPN configuration. In other words, both must use a Legacy Easy VPN configuration, or both must use a DVTI configuration.
  
  

  Here's the URL:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/sec_easy_vpn_rem_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1046365

  Hope that answers your question.

• problem of traffic flow with tunnel created the network with a tunnel to a VPN concentrator

  Hi, I worked with Cisco and the seller for 2 weeks on this.II am hoping that what we are witnessing will ring a Bell with someone.

  Some basic information:

  I work at a seller who needs from one site to the other tunnel.  There are currently 1 site to another with the seller using a Juniper SSG, which works without incident in my system.  I'm transitioning to routers Cisco 2811 and put in place a new tunnel with the seller for the 2800 uses a different public ip address in my address range.  So my network has 2 tunnels with the provider that uses a Cisco VPN concentrator.  The hosts behind the tunnel use 20x.x.x.x public IP addresses.

  My Cisco router will create a tunnel, but I can't not to hosts on the network of the provider through the Cisco 2811, but I can't get through the tunnel of Juniper.  The seller sees my packages and provider host meets them and sends them to the tunnel.  They never reach the external interface on my Cisco router.

  I'm from the external interface so that my endpoint and the peers are the same IP address.  (note, I tried to do a static NAT and have an address of tunnel and my different host to the same result.)  Cisco has confirmed that I do have 2 addresses different and this configuration was a success with the creation of another successful tunnels toa different network.)

  I tested this configuration on a network of transit area before moving the router to the production network and my Cisco 2811 has managed to create the tunnel and ping the inside host.  Once we moved the router at camp, we can no longer ping on the host behind the seller tunnel.   The seller assured me that the tunnel setting is exactly the same, and he sees his host to send traffic to the tunnel.  The seller seems well versed with the VPN concentrator and manages connections for many customers successfully.

  The seller has a second VPN concentrator on a separate network and I can connect to this VPN concentrator with success of the Cisco 2811 who is having problems with the hub, which has also a tunnel with Gin.

  Here is what we have done so far:

  (1) confirm the config with the help of Cisco 2811.  The tunnel is up.  SH cyrpto ipa wristwatch tunnel upward.
  (2) turn on Nat - T side of the tunnel VPN landscapers
  (3) confirm that the traffic flows properly a tunnel on another network (which would indicate that the Cisco config is ok)
  (4) successfully, tunnel and reach a different configuration hosting
  (5) to confirm all the settings of tunnel with the seller
  (6) the seller confirmed that his side host has no way and that it points to the default gateway
  (7) to rebuild the tunnel from scratch
  8) confirm with our ISP that no way divert traffic elsewhere.  My gateway lSP sees my directly connected external address.
  (9) confirm that the ACL matches with the seller
  (10) I can't get the Juniper because he is in production and in constant use

  Is there a known issue with the help of a VPN concentrator to connect to 2 tunnels on the same 28 network range?

  Options or ideas are welcome.  I had countless sessions with Cisco webex, but do not have access to the hub of the seller.  I can forward suggestions.

  Here's a code

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 2
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2

  Crypto ipsec transform-set mytrans aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 30
  Set transform-set RIGHT

  ISAKMP crypto key address No.-xauth

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  Description $ETH-LAN$$ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-FE $ 0/0
  IP 255.255.255.240
  IP access-group 107 to
  IP access-group out 106
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  route IP cache flow
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  crypto mymap map

  logging of access lists (applied outside to get an idea of what will happen.  No esp traffic happens, he has never hits)

  allowed access list 106 esp host host newspaper
  106 ip access list allow a whole
  allowed access list 107 esp host host Journal
  access-list 107 permit ip host host Journal

  access-list 107 permit ip host host Journal
  107 ip access list allow a whole

  Crypto isa HS her
  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
  status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
    QM_IDLE ASSETS 0 1010

  "Mymap" ipsec-isakmp crypto map 1
  Peer =.
  Extend the 116 IP access list
  access - list 116 permit ip host host (which is a public IP address))
  Current counterpart:
  Life safety association: 4608000 kilobytes / 2800 seconds
  PFS (Y/N): N
  Transform sets = {}
  myTrans,
  }

  OK - so I have messed around the lab for 20 minutes and came up with the below (ip are IP test:-)

  (4) ip nat pool crypto-nat 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 prefix length 30 <> it comes to the new address of NAT

  !
  (1) ip nat inside source list 102 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload <> it comes to the interface by default NAT

  !
  IP nat inside source map route overload of crypto-nat of crypto-nat pool <> it is the policy of the NAT function

  !

  (6) access-list 101 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> defines the IP source and destination traffic

  !

  (2) access-list 102 deny ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> does not NAT the normal communication

  (3) access-list 102 deny ip 10.1.1.1 host 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> does not re - NAT NAT

  (1) access-list 102 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 any <> allows everyone else to use the IP Address of the interface for NAT

  !

  (5) crypto-nat route-map permit 5 <> condition for the specific required NAT
  corresponds to the IP 101 <> game of traffic source and destination IP must be NAT'td

  (7) access list 103 permit ip 10.1.1.1 host 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> crypto acl

  Then, how the works above, when a package with the what IP 172.16.1.0/24 source wants to leave the router to connect to google, say the source will change to IP interface (1).  When 172.16.1.0/24 wants to talk to172.16.2.0/24, it does not get translated (2).  When the remote end traffic equaled the following clause of NAT - the already NAT'td IP will not be affected again (3) when a host 172.16.1.0/24 wants to communicate with 172.16.2.20/24 we need a NAT NAT specific pool is required (4).  We must define a method of specific traffic to apply the NAT with a roadmap (5) which applies only when the specific traffic (6), then simply define the interesting traffic to the VPN to initiate and enable comms (7) corresponding

• ASA 5510 - VPN for DMZ with static rule?

  I have a 5510 ASA with a number of virtual private networks to other sites, allowing the traffic to and from the Interior of the networks.

  I need to establish a VPN rule to another site, but they have very little access to resources on my local network.  Because I am not in control of the SAA on this end permanently, I need to control that access on my 5510.

  (the following is not my real IP, but I use them for this example)

  My network: 10.100.1.x

  My DMZ: 192.168.1.x

  Internal network of other sites: 172.16.1.x

  I wanted to try to create a VPN between the site and the specific address of DMZ on my side and then allow access to internal addresses using static rules.  I decided to use a static rule to enable http access to a specific server (for example):

  static (inside, dmz) 192.168.1.200 tcp 80 10.100.1.200 80

  I need allow traffic here:

  access-list permits DMZ_IN tcp host 172.16.1.10 host 192.168.1.200 eq 80

  Access-group interface dmz DMZ_IN

  And of course, rules of access list which allow traffic that I can apply to the VPN:

  toSite host 192.168.1.200 ip access list permit 172.16.1.10

  And I don't want that traffic THAT NAT had between my DMZ and the other site:

  nonatDMZ of the host 192.168.1.200 ip access list permit 172.16.1.10

  NAT (dmz) 0-list of access nonatDMZ

  NAT (dmz) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  And, of course, the corresponding rules on their ASA must be in place, allowing traffic to 192.168.1.200, not NAT it.

  Everything is in place, but 172.16.1.10 to 192.168.1.200 http traffic never reaches 10.100.1.200.  I know the following:

  1. the VPN is configured correctly.  If I add rules allowing traffic to (and from) 172.16.1.10 and 10.100.1.200 directly, they work.

  2 packet trace shows me that traffic is allowed.

  3. the works of static rule: to access the 192.168.1.200:80 of another host on the same interface, DMZ, which brings me to 10.100.1.200:80

  4. in the process of running a sniffer package on 10.100.1.200 shows 172.16.1.10 traffic does not reach it.

  So I'm banging my head against the wall here.  I'm sure it's something simple I'm missing.  Anything else I need to check?  Should I go about this a different way?

  Thank you.

  What you are trying to reach is not supported. You cannot configure NATing between the inside and the demilitarized zone interfaces while your VPN connection is from the external interface. The static NAT (inside the dmz) that you have configured will only work if the connection is initiated from the inside towards the demilitarized zone and vice versa.

  I think that what you are trying to reach is only allowing access on TCP/80 to10.100.1.200 for the VPN tunnel.

  You must configure your option 1:

  1. the VPN is configured correctly.  If I add rules allowing traffic to (and from) 172.16.1.10 and 10.100.1.200 directly, they work.

  You can configure vpn-filter to limit the traffic to the only TCP/80, and he attributed to group policy that you have assigned to this particular tunnel group then.

  Example:

  web access list - allow permit tcp host 172.16.1.10 host 10.100.1.200 eq 80

  internal group-policy-strategy web

  attribute group web-strategy strategy

  value of VPN-filter web - allows

  global-tunnel-group attributes

  Group Policy - by default-web-policy

  Here is an example configuration for your reference:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9a87.shtml

  Hope that helps.

• IOS: Dynamic VPN with l2tp/CVPN Client

  It is possible to configure a router (12.3.9a) to accept dynamic vpn through MS l2tp (XP sp1) and Cisco VPN client (4.0.5 for XP) at the same time?

  without the line 'crypto map vpn client client authentication list userauthen' 2 vpn clients work but cisco vpn client does not request a user name and password.

  with this line, the l2tp MS client fails.

  Here is my config:

  AAA authentication login userauthen local

  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

  !

  VPDN enable

  !

  VPDN-group pino

  ! Default L2TP VPDN group

  accept-dialin

  L2tp Protocol

  virtual-model 1

  Force-local-chap

  no authentication of l2tp tunnel

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 100

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 5000

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  isakmp encryption key * address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group pino

  key *.

  domain test.test

  pool pool_cvpn

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac set_3des

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac set_l2tp

  transport mode

  !

  dynamic-map crypto CVPN 20

  Set transform-set set_l2tp

  match the address l2tp_acl

  !

  crypto dynamic-map CVPNN 10

  Set transform-set set_3des

  !

  crypto map vpn client client authentication list userauthen

  crypto map client-vpn isakmp authorization list groupauthor

  address of card crypto configuration vpn-client client answer

  Crypto map 10-client vpn ipsec-isakmp dynamic CVPN

  Crypto map 20-customer vpn ipsec-isakmp dynamic CVPNN

  Thank you

  Davide

  Hi David

  Although it is a L2TP/dynamic IPSEC, you must have authentication configured for dynamic clients.

  hope this link can clear things...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801dddbb.shtml

  regds

  Prem

• Connection with the client VPN for RV110W problem

  Hi guys: I just installed a RV110W router to my small business and I try to connect via VPN from home client.  I was unable to do so, no matter what I try.  Relevant information:

  1. I can connect to the router via remote very well management, so I know that the router is accessible from the Net.

  2. internal address of the router: 10.81.208.1

  3. active PPTP.  PPTP server IP address: 10.0.0.1

  4 IP addresses for PPTP clients: 10.0.0.10 - 14

  5. two VPN clients added - one with PPTP, with the QuickVPN Protocol Protocol.  Both are enabled (and Yes, I triple checked passwords)

  6 encryption MPPE and Netbios active.

  7 IPSec, PPTP and L2TP all active gateways.

  8 VPN client: 1.4.1.2

  9. computer: laptop running Windows 7 family (64-bit), with the firewall Windows is activated.

  10 home network: 192.168.2.196

  It is causing to tear my hair out.  What Miss me?

  Shannon

  Hi Shannon,

  I am pleased to see that you're progress.

  Shannon Rotz wrote:
  I changed the RM port to 443.  Unfortunately, now I can't connect to the router via browser, either by remote management or from the local network - I get the usual "page cannot be displayed".  How do I get back into the router configuration GUI?
  

  You should be able to reach the GUI by typing https://192.168.1.1(assuming that you have not changed the default IP address) normally once you replace http (port 80) with https (port 443) the internal router web server automatically will redirect you to the https page if you type http. Open your command prompt and try to do a ping of the IP address of the router to ensure that it still meets this address

  With regards to the VPN client:   Up until I changed the port, the same error message kept coming up, i.e. "Unable to establish connection" (or something like that), with a list of possible reasons why it couldn't connect. Now the message has changed - I'm getting "Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer".  If I continue trying to connect, then it says "Activating Policy", followed by "Verifying Network", then "The remote gateway is not responding.  Do you want to wait?"  This is definitely progress, since I never got this far before.

  You are a quarter inch offline. If you look at the log.txt in C:\Program Cisco Small Business\QuickVPN Client, in my view, you will see "Failed to ping router remote VPN! This means that your PC is blocking the ping to the router response. Usually, if you look at this point the status of Client VPN in the router (first of all need to remote management) you will see that your user status is "connected." If the router thinks that the connection is established, but the PC does not work. You might want to try another PC at this stage to verify that it is indeed a problem with your PC. This problem is usually caused by the 3rd party software antivirus/firewall blocking the ping response. Microsoft Security Essentials can do this as well, so if you turn it off. If you do not have another PC to test from, call Cisco Small Business Support and ask a technician, try to connect to the lab. You can find the number to call here

  On an impulse, I tried setting up a Windows VPN connection, i.e. created a new VPN connection in Network and Sharing Center, using a PPTP client ID that I had created.  That connection actually worked, except for one problem:  I can't see the remote network.  If I could solve that problem, I'll just tell the other clients to use a Windows connection rather than QuickVPN.
  

  Good thought. If you do not see the remote devices, make sure that they do not block VPN connections. (Windows or third-party firewall, antivirus, antispyware) With a connection, PPTP or QuickVPN, you should be able to go to run, type the IP address of the device that you want to connect to (i.e. \\192.168.1.101 ) and see the list of shared folders. After the PPTP connection is established, try to ping the address LAN IP of the router. If it is successful, try to ping a LAN device such as a network printer or a PC. Again, PCs may block ping requests if they have a firewall running watch so for this.

  Answer please if you have any questions.

• Help with dynamic scripting for drift property

  Hello

  I try to get the list nodes children, then loopthorugh the nodes to do some calculations in a property derived by using dynamic scripts. I tried with the below script.

  var childEnumerator is node. GetChildEnumerator();

  While (childEnumerator.MoveNext ())

  {

  var varValeurProp = childEnumerator.GetCurrent (). PropValue ("Custom.Salary");

  Print (propvalue);

  }

  While evaluating this script, I get an error below. No idea what I'm missing here?

  DRM-16008: there was a calculation Script Custom.TotalSalaryExp for EMP_Zone/Emp/PPD1 property error: TypeError: 'GetChildEnumerator' is not a function

  Please help me. Thank you fr your cooperation

  Kind regards

  Nathalie

  Try this instead...

  var childEnumerator is node. GetChildEnumerator();

  childEnumerator.MoveNext ();

  While (childEnumerator.GetCurrent ()! = null)

  {

  var varValeurProp = childEnumerator.GetCurrent (). PropValue ("Custom.Salary");

  Print (propvalue);

  childEnumerator.MoveNext ();

  }

• Dynamic action for validation of date with the notification message plugin

  Hi all

  Someone help me please with dynamic action for validation of date with the message notification plugin. I have a form with two elements of the date picker control and message notification plugin.

  The requirement first user selects the exam is finished and then selects the date. So, if the date is greater than the date of the examination is over + 2 years then doesn't trigger the message notification plugin. I tried to create that dynamic action on the date picker date that triggers the scheduled issue notification message but I want to make conditional, I mean displays the message only if date of the selected is greater than the date of the exam is finished more than 2 years.

  In terms simple, notification is displayed only if provided is superior to (date of the exam is completed + 2 years).

  I use oracle apex 4.0 version and oracle 10g r2 database. I tried to reproduce the same requirement in my personal workspace. Here are the details. Please take a look.

  Workspace: raghu_workspace

  username: orton607

  password: orton607

  APP # 72193

  PG # 1

  Any help is appreciated.

  Thanks in advance.

  Orton.

  You can get the value of the date of entry:

  $(ele) .datePicker ('getDate');

  So what to add functions such as:

  function validateNotification (d1, d2) {}

  Date1 var = $(d1) .datepicker ('getDate');

  date2 var = $(d2) .datepicker ('getDate');

  if(date1 && date2) {}

  return ((date2.getTime()-date1.getTime())/(1000*24*60*60))>(365*2);

  } else {}

  Returns false;

  }

  }

  The logic based on setting (I have two years from years of 365 days preceding)

  Then in the D.A. specify a JavaScript expression as:

  validateNotification ('P2_REVIEW_COMPLETED', this.triggeringElement.id)

  Refer to page 2 for example.

• problem with the tutorial: creating a dynamic playlist for streaming flash video

  Hi, someone tried the tutorial: creating a dynamic playlist for streaming flash video?
  
  I followed the instructions exactly as stated in the tutorial and test the fla file, it worked perfectly, when I open the swf file using macromedia flash 8. All looks good. Nothing has changed except that the url is replaced by 'rtmp://localhost/videosource' in the xml file.
  
  After I publish the file by using the parameter: network access only, I try to open the file swf and html file, the thumbnail does not appear and there is no way I can click on videos. What I see is that the list, and there is no answer the flash media server 2. All files in the same folder. Someone please help with this problem? Thank you

  .. .i debug movie step by step
  and realized that the xml file is read by the code...

  Your initial problem said it worked but not playing outside of the
  Flash authoring environment simply load the SWF from the hard drive.

  The Flash programming environment is an environment of confidence and so you really
  need to test what a swf loading in the mode of deployment since the
  hard drive is not a valid deployment, unless a Flash player installed is
  available outside the web browser that you would like you have the
  Authoring tool and your users will not.

  Use a browser with http://yourdomain.com/yourmovie.html to make final
  debugging.

  In this regard, you will need to debug movie when running in real time
  mode in a web browser with http:// A technical track, I suggested is of
  create a temporary TextField might be named out_txt and send the trace message to
  It's like out_txt.text += 'my Expression of Trace ".

  --
  LON Hosford
  www.lonhosford.com
  Number of happy bits exempts your way!
  "free23" wrote in message
  News:e4a37a$AK5$1@forums. Macromedia.com...
  Sorry but I don't understand what you mean... to debug the movie step by step
  and realized that the xml file is read by the code...
  It is a sample of my log files:
  #Fields: date time x - pid registered x x - ctx x-comment
  2006-05-15 20:08:58 3072 unloaded application instance (i) 2651170
  VideoSource/_definst_-
  2006-05-15 20:48:19 3848 (s) FCApplication 2641173 successfully loaded.
  2006-05-15 20:48:19 3848 (s) 2641173 Communication Executive
  successfully.
  2006-05-15 20:48:19 3848 (s) SimpleConnect 2641173 successfully loaded. -
  2006-05-15 20:48:19 3848 (s) successfully loaded 2641173 videoconference. -
  2006-05-15 20:48:19 3848 (s) 2641173 Video Playback loaded successfully. -
  2006-05-15 20:48:19 law enforcement components of Communication 3848 (s) 2641173
  successfully.
  2006-05-15 20:48:19 3848 (s) 2641173 sends this message: Hello! You are
  logged in as: not defined.
  2006-05-15 20:48:19 3848 (e) 2641190 error: msg sent to the client command
  connection has been accepted. -
  2006-05-15 20:48:20 3848 (s) 2641173 sends this message: Hello! You are
  logged in as: not defined.
  2006-05-15 20:48:20 3848 (e) 2641190 error: msg sent to the client command
  connection has been accepted. -
  2006-05-15 20:48:20 3848 (s) 2641173 sends this message: Hello! You are
  logged in as: not defined.
  2006-05-15 20:48:20 3848 (e) 2641190 error: msg sent to the client command
  connection has been accepted. -
  2006-05-15 20:48:20 3848 (s) 2641173 sends this message: Hello! You are
  logged in as: not defined.
  2006-05-15 20:48:20 3848 (e) 2641190 error: msg sent to the client command
  connection has been accepted. -
  2006-05-15 20:48:20 3848 (s) 2641173 sends this message: Hello! You are
  logged in as: not defined.
  2006-05-15 20:48:20 3848 (e) 2641190 error: msg sent to the client command
  connection has been accepted. -
  2006-05-15 20:49:42 3848 (s) 2641173 sends this message: Hello! You are
  logged in as: false.

  I hope this helps...

• Cisco ASA 5510 VPN Site to Site with Sonicwall

  I am trying to configure a tunnel between a Cisco ASA 5510 VPN (Version 8.2 (2)) and TZ200 Sonicwall. I rose tunnel and go and I am able to ping the internal IP address of Cisco ASA of the Sonicwall LAN but nothing work. When I try to ping a host behind the Cisco ASA of the Sonicwall LAN I get the following message "rules asymmetrical NAT matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for tcp src outside:10.20.10.x/xxxx dst inside:10.20.2.x/xxxx refused due to failure of reverse path of NAT"on the SAA

  Googling the error above shows the problems with version 8.3 or later that resembled the nat commands have been changed SAA, train is still on 8.2 but I another common question does not add an exemption of NAT I have double-triple checked that I did add an exception rule of NAT of the hosts on the network from cisco for the guests of the Sonicwall network. Looks like I hit a road block so any help would be appreciated. Thank you

  Here are a few excertps of the config file (10.20.2.0 behind the cisco) and 10.20.10.0 behind the sonicwall

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  ..

  IP 10.20.2.0 allow Access-list extended sheep 255.255.255.0 10.20.10.0 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 10.20.2.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 10.20.10.0 255.255.255.0

  ..

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  card crypto outside_map 1 set counterpart x.x.x.x

  card crypto outside_map 1 set of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA

  outside_map card crypto 65535-isakmp dynamic ipsec SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  ..

  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  crypto ISAKMP policy 5

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  lifetime 28800

  ..

  internal SiteToSitePolicy group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy SiteToSitePolicy

  VPN-idle-timeout no

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Split-tunnel-network-list no

  ..

  tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group x.x.x.x General attributes

  Group Policy - by default-SiteToSitePolicy

  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x

  pre-shared key *.

  ..

  Added some excerpts from the configuration file

  Hello Manjitriat,

  Okay, detected IPSEC parody is normal, that means you are trying to send unencrypted on a line of encrypted packets.

  Now, if you see on the plotter of package that traffic will hollow the VPN channel all its fine in your site.

  Now the packet tracer must be something like this:

  entrance to Packet-trace inside private_ip_lan destination_private_ip_lan 1025 tcp 80

  Please provide us with the result of the following instructions after you run the packet tracer.

  See the crypto Isakamp SA

  See the crypto Ipsec SA

  Kind regards

  Julio

• Cisco ASA VPN Site to Site WITH NAT inside

  Hello!

  I have 2 ASA 5505 related to IPSEC Tunnel VPN Site to Site.

  A 192.168.1.0/24 'remotely' inside the network and a local "192.168.200.0/24' inside the network (you can see the diagram)

  The local host have 192.168.200.254 as default gateway.

  I can't add static route to all army and I can't add static route to 192.168.200.254.

  NAT the VPN entering as 192.168.200.1 or a 192.168.200.x free to connect my host correcly?

  If my host sends packet to exit to the default gateway.

  Thank you for your support

  Best regards

  Marco

  The configuration must be applied on the SAA with the 192.168.200.0 subnet it is inside, there must be something like this:

  permit 192.168.1.0 ip access list VPN_NAT 255.255.255.0 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (outside) X VPN_NAT outside access list

  Global (inside) X Y.Y.Y.Y (where the Y.Y.Y.Y) is the ip address

  If you have other traffic on the vpn through the tunnel that requires no nat, then you must add external nat exemption rules since these lines above obliges all traffic through the asa to have a nat statement.

  See if it works for you, else post your config nat here.

• VPN site to Site with NAT (PIX 7.2)

  Hi all

  I hope for more help with config PIX.  TBH I would classify myself as a newb on PIX, only dabbling in it every 6 months or so...

  I have to configure a VPN site-to site between our UK and US Office, to replace our frame relay link.  I have configured multiple VPN site to site on the before PIX, so am reasonably okay with the appearance of the config of who.  What is a new concept for me is the needs of NAT'ing between the IPSEC tunnel.

  The U.S. Agency requires us to NAT source addresses (i.e. 192.168.1.0) usable on their side address (i.e. 143.102.89.0).  The tunnel must then be set to encrypt traffic between 143.102.89.0/24 and 172.24.0.0/14.

  I added the following config and hoping to test it at the U.S. office happens online today.

  If I Ping from 192.168.1.0 to 172.24.x.x source and run a SH NAT inside, the NAT translation seems good.

  is the intellectual property inside 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 outside 172.24.0.0 255.252.0.0
  static translation at 143.102.89.0
  translate_hits = 4, untranslate_hits = 0

  Could someone please go through the following lines of config and comment if there is no error?

  Thank you very much

  Kevin

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

  IP 143.102.89.0 allow Access-list ipsec - dallas extended 255.255.255.0 172.24.0.0 255.252.0.0

  policy-nat-dallas-list of allowed extensive access ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.24.0.0 255.252.0.0

  public static 143.102.89.0 (inside, outside) - list of access policy-nat-dallas

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3desmd5set

  card crypto map dyn 40 correspondence address ipsec - dallas

  set dyn-map 40 crypto map peer 143.101.6.141

  card crypto dyn-map 40 transform-set 3desmd5set

  dyn-map interface card crypto outside

  crypto isakmp identity address

  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  tunnel-group 143.101.6.141 type ipsec-l2l

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 143.101.6.141

  pre-shared-key *.

  You can configure NAT/Global pair for the rest of the users.

  For example:

  You can use the initially configured ACL:

  policy-nat-dallas-list of allowed extensive access ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.24.0.0 255.252.0.0
  NAT (inside) 1 access list policy-nat-dallas

  Global 1 143.102.89.x (outside)

  The static statement that you configured previously will take precedence over the above. So the printer gets statically using a NAT to 143.102.89.10, and the rest can do another ip address 143.102.89.x PATed.

  Please note that for PAT, traffic can only be initiated from 192.168.1.0/24 LAN to 172.24.0.0/14, not the other way around.

  Hope that helps.

• Problem VPN site to Site with overlapping networks

  We currently have a PIX 515E firewall as a headboard with many tunnels of site-to-site configured for her with the enpoints of PIX 506. Our internal LAN addressing scheme is 172.18.0.0 255.255.0.0. Addresses of local network in two of the remote networks with congigured VPN site-to-site are 172.18.107.0 255.255.255.224 and 172.18.107.32 255.255.255.0. Remote network access to all services on our internal network very well. We have 20 other network segments configured the same way. The 172.18.107.32.0 network needs to communicate with the 172.18.107.0 network for the services of file on the other remote PIX. Since the station PIX will not allow traffic to leave the same interface it came we thought with him we would just set up a tunnel from site to site between the two remote LAN. After the configuration of the site to another remote firewalls do not appear to try to establish tunnels when sending valuable traffic. I turned on debug for ISAKMP and nothing is either sent or received on a remote Firewall with regard to these tunnels. It's almost like since we already have a tunnel set to our 172.18.0.0 internal LAN that the remote PIX will not build specifically to 172.18.107.0 tunnel. I am able to ping each remote peer with each other and hear protection rules, but nothing has ever been established.

  Is what we are trying to do possible? Sorry for the long post but the kind of a strange scenario. Thanks in advance for any help.

  In what order are the numbers of seqence card crypto for configuring vpn on pix distance units? It could be that you are trying to install is a lot and will be checked later as head of pix. If this is the case, then yes the 172.18/16 road prevail the 172.18.107/24. Try to rebuild the entrance card crypto with a lower number so that traffic to 172.18.107/24 comes first.

  I would like to know how it works.