Error-200077 occurred at DAQmx control

Similar Questions

• Error-50103 occurred at DAQmx control

  We strive to take into two signals in LabVIEW through our acquisition of data, and then pass them through two channels of detection of distinct peaks, however, when we try to run the program, we get the following message is displayed:

  Error-50103 occurred at DAQmx control Task.vi:14

  Possible reasons:

  The specified resource is reserved. The operation could not be performed as indicated.

  Task name: _unnamedTask<9>

  I have attached the circuit we use below, any help woud be appreciated.

  Problem solved, use:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/485201B647950BF886257537006CEB89#case4

• error-50103 occurred at DAQmx control Task.vi:6

  I'm new to LabVIEW. I'm using LabView 8.6 and one NEITHER cDAQ-9172. For practice, I'm doing a program that takes the temperature and pressure readings and graphs.

  I don't have the modules or sensors yet, so I started by simulating a RTD temperature measurement NI9217 and a NI9237 module for the measurement of pressure.

  I created 2 while loops that run in parallel. One with an assistant of data acquisition for the temperature and the other with an assistant of data acquisition for the pressure.

  Highlight run out, when I run the program, the signal is both while loops. The temperature seems to work ok and the data graphic. The pressure, however, only goes in once, and I get the error message: "error-50103 occurred at Task.vi:6 DAQmx control Possible reason (s): the specified resource is reserved." The operation could not be performed as indicated. »

  In addition, the stop button does work on my front. I have to use the button stop in the toolbar.

  Anyone has any advice on what I can do to fix this problem or any suggestions on the best ways to address the issue?

  Thank you.

  Search the forums for error 50103.  That will tell you everything you need to know about this error code.

  For more information on your questions, post your VI so we can see what might be wrong.

• Error-50103 occurred at DAQmx start Task.vi:11

  Hello

  I use a nor-6008 to perform a thermal sector and I get the error "error-50103 occurred at DAQmx Start Task.vi:11 '. I have read other forums of discussion and it seems combe because I use the wizard DAQmx who don't properly resolve the resource when finsihed. I've dug further and saw that it is linked to an on-board clock synchronization problems. However, I can understand how to solve this problem.

  I thought that I create a loop that continuously monitors inputs and sometimes to interrogate the memory so I'm not kidding to the top of the clock. It's much harder to do than sounds. Can someone take a look at my code and give me some advice/suggestions to clean the DAQmx assistants.

  Thanks in advance

  Cole

  I finished by dividing my resource between the two input channels using a single assistant DAQ and dividing down the data rate and the number of samples. Works fine now.

  Big pain in the ass well.

• Error-200022 occurred at DAQmx start Task.vi

  Hello

  I have peripheral cDAQ and 3 modules that nor-9234 connected.

  My program (see attachment) works correctly with only 2 modules, but does not work with 3 modules.

  With 3 modules I have this error: "error-200022 occurred at Task.vi DAQmx Start.»   "Possible reasons: resource requested by this task has already been reserved by another task."

  To solve this problem, please help me

  Thank you

  Now I understant the error. This is correct (see below)

  

• Error-50103 occurred at DAQmx Start Task

  Hello!

  I use the attached VI to control a stepper motor which works perfectly under LV2010 but begins to throw error (image below) when used under LV2012. If anyone has any idea please help... -Thank you!

  Note I have DAQ assistant is configured correctly.

  

  Hi KowdTek,

  Thank you for the update.  I assumed you didn't intend the output to be continuous (smooth).

  Screw Express generally are not designed for this type of use because they open and close a session whenever you call one.  This should result in a glitch in the output as you have seen.  To be honest, I'm quite surprised you did not see this before not smooth behavior with your application on Windows XP, and I don't have a good explanation of why it worked.  I can, however, recommend a more robust approach to generate this smooth output you are looking for.

  If the goal is to only move once by INIT (for example once you start moving, do not stop until you are finished, how the VI returns to INIT state), you must convert your VI Express DAQmx code (right-click"NOR-DAQmx generate code).  And try a similar implementation in your case EXEC & LUN.  This should produce the desired behavior.

  

  Kind regards

• Error 200485 error has occurred to DAQmx create Task.vi:2

  I continue to have this error:

  The specified task cannot be loaded because it is not in the area of data.

  Check the data area to the MAX. You are looking for similar characters, such as the capital letter 'o' and the number zero.

   

  
  I would like to know what is the problem with the program.  I have attached the VI.

  Basically I'm controlling a physical light connected to the NI Elvis II by comparing input from 0-7 DIO and DIO 8-15.

  So if DIO 0 is enabled, 8 DIO must also be to turn on the LED.

  But for the moment, the program may not run. Need assistance to locate the error! ><>

  Try the function AND.

• Error-200278 occurred at DAQmx Read

  Hello

  Following an updated example developed by an engineer to support NOR super useful. I did a routine very simple acquisition of a certain level of synchronization between tasks (attached) to use in a PXI system between modules of strain gauges (4330), voltage module (6341) and a frame of independent SCXI1000. The routine seems to work very well up to a certain point, when a very strange problem appears (-200278). It's always the voltage task that generates the error.

  Any suggestions?

  The task of voltage is set to acquire finished samples.  You want "Continuous samples" I think.

• 9237 with deck full load cell: support cell_null_off_shuntcal.vi survey error 200077

  Normal
  0

  fake
  fake
  fake

  EN-US
  X NONE
  X NONE

  / * Style definitions * /.
  table. MsoNormalTable
  {mso-style-name: "Table Normal";}
  MSO-knew-rowband-size: 0;
  MSO-knew-colband-size: 0;
  MSO-style - noshow:yes;
  MSO-style-priority: 99;
  MSO-style - qformat:yes;
  "mso-style-parent:" ";" "
  MSO-padding-alt: 0 cm 0 cm 5.4pt 5.4pt;
  MSO-para-margin-top: 0 cm;
  MSO-para-margin-right: 0 cm;
  MSO-para-margin-bottom: 10.0pt;
  MSO-para-margin-left: 0 cm;
  line-height: 115%;
  MSO-pagination: widow-orphan;
  font-size: 11.0pt;
  font family: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif ';
  MSO-ascii-font-family: Calibri;
  MSO-ascii-theme-make: minor-latin;
  MSO-hansi-font-family: Calibri;
  MSO-hansi-theme-make: minor-latin ;}

  Hello

  I'm trying to use the example
  load_cell_null_off_shuntcal.VI with a scale of full-bridge (Honeywell
  Model 31, not amplified). I'm using LabView 8.6, cDAQ-9172 and NI9237. The
  load cell is connected to the pins 2,3,6 and 7.

  Entries for the front side of the VI
  are: excitation10V internal; mV/V 2.1492 (calibration sheet); weight max 10
  lbs; resistance bridge 350 ohms (Honeywell specifications); 9237 shunt internal
  100 kohm resistance; map of shunt R4 (default setting). I chose
  "Do not offset null" and "shunt cal.

  This is the error I get:

  Error-200077 occurred at DAQmx
  Do a calibration Shunt (bridge) .vi:1 or the possible reasons:

  Measurements: Requested value is not
  support for this property value.

  Property:
  AI. Bridge.ShuntCal.GainAdjust

  You asked:-61.980405e3

  Valid values begin with: 500.0e - 3

  Valid values ending with: 1.500000

  If the "shunt cal.
  green button is not selected, there is no error. I understand that the Gain
  Change value should be approximately 1, whereas I get is much larger. The Subvi DAQmx PerformShuntCalibration
  .VI (bridge) contains a "Call library function node" which I did not
  find out how interrogate.

  Someone else has experience
  with this error? Do you have any advice on:

  1)
  How to 'see' the calculations being
  carried out inside the "call library function node"?

  2)
  What the correct shunt element
  a full-bridge load cell location is? (although changing this location only)
  does not eliminate the error, I can't find this info).

  3)
  What can I do wrong with
  my entries to cause this error?

  Thank you

  Claire.

  Hi Claire,

  You must physically connect the SC of arm of the bridge terminals (normally R3). The terminal is not provided for the connection of external resistors.

  See the example

  C:\Program NIUninstaller Instruments\LabVIEW 8.6\examples\DAQmx\Analog In\Measure Strain.llb\Cont Acq strain samples (with calibration) - OR 9237.vi

• Error-200431 occurred at .vi DAQmx Create Channel (I-acceleration-accelerometer)

  Hello

  I tried to use DAQmx Create Channel to accelerometer and yet it responds with error (see below). When I use max OR to measure the accelerometer (I-acceleration-accelerometer), there is no error, and I see that acceloremeter works.

  OR PXI-1042 and I use OR-4462 card to measure vibration vith acceloremeter.
  

  Error-200431 occurred at DAQmx Virtual Channel Create

  Possible reasons:

  Physical channel selected does not support the type of measure required by the virtual channel you create.

  Create a channel to a type of measure that is supported by the physical channel, or select a physical channel that supports the type of measure.

  Property: I. MeasType
  Requested value:
  You can select: sound pressure, voltage: Microphone, accelerometer, Position: Eddy Current proximity probe, Force sensor: IEPE, speed sensor: IEPE

  Task name: _unnamedTask<104>

  Hi serdaryilmaz,

  I'm not sure why the accelerometer mode does not work, but it works very well in normal mode - it maybe has to do with the accelerometer, you?  Whatever it is, if it works with the voltage mode, I am happy that we found a way to make it work.  Is this an acceptable work around you?

• load cell 9237 + full-bridge: load cell_null_off_shuntcal.vi - error 200077

  I try to use load_cell_null_off_shuntcal.vi with load cell (Honeywell model 31, not amplified). I'm using LabView 8.6, cDAQ-9172 and NI9237. Entries: excitation10V internal; mV/V 2.1492 (calib. bin); weight 10 lbs max. resistance bridge 350 ohms (Honeywell specifications); 9237 internal shunt resistance 100 kohm; map of shunt R4 (default setting). Selected "offset null" and "shunt cal.

  Error-200077 occurred to Shunt calibration perform DAQmx
  . VI:1 (bridge) or the possible reasons:

  Measurements: Requested value is not a supported value for
  This property.

  Property: I. Bridge.ShuntCal.GainAdjust

  You asked:-61.980405e3

  Valid values begin with: 500.0e - 3

  Valid values ending with: 1.500000

  If "shunt cal' green button not selected, no error. Setting the gain should be about 1. Subvi DAQmx PerformShuntCalibration (bridge) .vi contains "Call library function node" which is locked (?).

  Any ideas?

  What is the location of item correct shunt for a full-bridge load cell? Change this location does not eliminate the error.

  Hello, YTC,.

  The problem is most likely in your external connections of the NI 9237 and the load cell.  As mentioned in NI 9237 Operating Instructions and specifications, page 9, SC + SC - pins must be connected to the terminals of the resistance specified in the .vi of Shunt calibration perform DAQmx (bridge) (in the case of a full bridge, it would be R3).

  Let me know if you still have problems with your calibration.

• Why do I get error 200077 on the SMU-6124 system

  My program works well for DAC 6115 and 6110. Now, I'll apply to SMU-6124 (BNC-2110 borad). When I change the mode of DC to AC coupling, error: 200077 property Node DAQmx channel occurred. More in the attachment. Can someone help me solve this problem? Thank you very much.

  renwei,

  Please use the Forums of NOR. The reason you get this error is that the SMU-6124 only supports the DC coupling. If you look at the specifications of the SMU-6124 has this as "input coupling. SMU-6124 specification. Regarding the 6115 and the 6110 they charge AC and DC coupling, (card PCI-6110) so it seems that your program is trying to address the coupling of the SMU-6124 as AC coupling. As long as you assign the coupling for the DC 6124 you have no problems. I hope this helps.

• Error 200077 (frequency) and 200452 (task control loop) error occurred DAQmx create calendar Source.vi

  Hello

  I'm trying to control the timing of a timed loop. So far, I have tried several approaches via the software and which worked very well except the time loop in some missed cases 1-2 Ms I want to make sure the timing is right. I tried to provide an external clock through the acquisition of data I. The system I use is NI USB-6212. It has two counters and DIO and AIO, but I keep getting errors. I tried two different approaches. One was to use directly the game 'DAQmx create calendar Source.vi' in frequency mode, and when I did, I got error 200077. Then I found a post of somone saying that sometimes it is not possible and an alternative method is to use the same vi but set task of loop control mode. This one gave me Error200452. For this one you will see in my attachment the suggestion was to use an AI then the moment of him and then use this task for Creat DAQmx synchronization Source.

  I don't know what the problem is or if I need to put something differently.

  Please let me know if you can help me with this.

  I'll try to continue to work on that, but if anyone of you a suggestion I'll be very happy to consider the issue.

  Thank you in advance,

  Best, Massimo.

  Massimo,

  In my view, the errors that you see are the result of your hardware USB-6212 is supporting the functionality of the task control loop.  I have a M Series PCI card that is capable of operating both of your screws attached without problem (although they still +/-1ms variation on occaision).  When I try to use a USB-6212 simulation, I get the same error codes that you do.  Unfortunately, it's just a case of a lack of equipment.

  Kind regards

• Error-200524 occurred at .vi:2 DAQmx Write (analog 1-d NChan DBL 1Samp)

  I'm trying to generate a signal to usb-6009 of simulated signal.

  However, he keep poping errors:

  Error-200524 occurred at .vi:2 DAQmx Write (analog 1-d NChan DBL 1Samp) if I choose "1 sample on request" in mx data acquisition.

  If I have chaged to "continuous sample", the error has become

  Error-200077 during the property Node DAQmx Timing (arg) 1 DAQmx Timing (sample clock) .vi:3-> 1.vi:Instance:0:1-> Untitled 1 Untitled. VI

  Can someone could take care of my problem?

  Very appreciate

  The limitations of the analog output of your device is documented in the manual and has been considered on several occasions. Because it supports at the time of the application, you can only pass a single value to a moment, not a waveform. The timing is only the software and you can not generate a signal without a lot of jitter and the max frequency will be by the spec.

• Error-200609 occurred in the DAQmx write: selected buffer too small

  Hello, I write a few VI simple test that I will build finally to call external analogue output VI. I started with a very simple program to produce samples finished using the clock on board with DAQmx Timing.VI. When I run the program, I almost immediately get an error. The error message is below.

  Error-200609 occurred at writing DAQmx (Analog DBL 1Chan 1Samp) .vi:1

  Possible reasons:

  Generation cannot be started because the size of the selected buffer is too small.

  Increase the size of the buffer.

  Contradictory property
  Property: Output.BufSize
  Corresponding value: 1
  Minimum supported value: 2

  Task name: _unnamedTask<1C>

  I used the VI DAQmx before in similar applications and never encountered this error. In addition, I read the link below which DAQmx Timing.VI should automatically generate the buffer. Any ideas what could be the cause?

  Data sheet:

  Windows 7

  LabVIEW 2012

  PCIe-6353 as DAQ card

  Here is a picture of my diagram and the VI is attached.

  Oops. Just realized my very stupid mistake: I forgot to add the VI of task start. I did and it works as expected.