Exchange Bank 2013 deadline
In the management console Exchange 2013 why you cannot set limits of smaller than 1 GB mailboxes.
Issue warning at (GB):
Prohibit send at (GB):
Prohibit send and receive at (GB):
Does anyone know how to crush it.
Thsnks
Joe
Joe
Your Question is completely adapted to an Exchange Forum... Kindly Post here
Tags: Windows
Similar Questions
-
TMSXE support for Exchange SP1 2013 - anytime soon?
I was wondering if there is any word on TMSXE supporting Exchange SP1 2013 anytime soon?
I did the guys from our Exchange wait so long upgrade of Exchange 2007 that during the TMSXE supported it, Exchange SP1 2013 is already out, so now they are still waiting for me: P
Hello
2013 Exchange SP1 is supported in TMSXE 4.1, which will allow us to release in the not-too-distant future.
Kind regards
Kjetil -
Compatibility of Exchange Server 2013 with OIM 11g R2 BP 14
Hello
My system is configured as shown below the configuration and integrated into Exchange Server.
Wanted to know would be compatible with Exchange server 2013.
Would appreciate if you could share any link or documents that list this matrix.
IOM - 11.1.2.0.0 with BP-14 version
Database Version - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64 bit Production
WebLogic Version - 10.3.6.0
Version of connector AD- 11.1.1.5.0
AD installed on Windows Server 2008
Version of Exchange Connector - 11.1.1.5.0
Type of current - Exchange Server OnPremise2010
Thanks in advance
Puneet
You must upgrade your Exchange server connector .
Please see below note;
Target systems
The target system can be one or a combination of the following:
- Microsoft Exchange 2007 SP1, SP2, SP3 (64-bit)
- Microsoft Exchange 2010 RTM, SP1, SP2, SP3 (64-bit)
- Microsoft Exchange 2013 RTM (64-bit)
For support of Exchange 2013, Patch 17239236 must be applied to the version 11.1.1.6.0 of the Exchange Connector. This Patch can come from My Oracle Support under patches and updates.
Download location for connector:
Microsoft Exchange 11.1.1.6.0 
http://download.Oracle.com/OTN/NT/IAS/connectors/111/Exchange-11.1.1.6.0.zip Change - 11.1.1.6.0.zip~ J
Note:
------
Please check the response as useful or correct when it is appropriate to make it easier for others to find
-
Deployment of Exchange Server 2013 on VMware Fault Tolerance
Hi people,
Instead of using the DAG have on the Exchange Server 2013, which is warnings for the stand-alone Exchange 2013 Server deployment and then implementation of the Vmware FT or at least HA to the availability at the hypervisor level?
With HA no problem - with FT under vSphere 5.1, you are limited to a single vCPU VM-
-
Can ColdFusion 10 connects to Exchange Server 2013?
There are a lot of forums and chats on 10 ColdFusion connection to Exchange Server 2010. Anyone know if 10 ColdFusion can connect to Exchange Server 2013. If you don't know, what are the steps? I tried all the stuff used in ColdFusion 10 connection to Exchange Server 2010 and still not connect to Exchange Server 2013.
Found a solution. Yes, you can connect 10 ColdFusion to Exchange Server 2013 but there is a slight twist to the solution if you want to use the features of cfexchangeXXXXX.
1. ensure to that you have imported the certificate Exchange Server 2013 into 10 ColdFusion server.
2. in the cfexchangeconnection call, add:
ServerVersion = "2010".
Protocol = 'https'
formbasedauthentication = 'TRUE '.
formbasedauthenticationURL = "XXXXXX".
If serverversion is missing, it will default to Server 2007.
-
Backup of mailbox Exchange Enterprise 2013 with Microsoft
Hello
I have a customer who bought the Exchange Ent. 2013, to obtain the mailbox to the Microsoft backup.
I'm trying to find how to implement this feature. Tech support tells me that I need a support contract. I think of buying, I should get instructions on how to use a feature without paying a surcharge.
What I need and wait are instructions for what we bought.
Gary
Hi Gary,.
For assistance with this query, you can ask your question on the TechNet forums.
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?category=ExchangeServer
-
Exchange of 2013 database checksum failed.
When the verification of checksum for data bases will start on my exchange server, it runs VERY slowly (currently running for 9 hours and has more than 3 to go) and fails on several databases. Some are successful.
System.AggregateException: One or more errors occurred. ---> System.AggregateException: one or more errors occurred. ---> Replay.Core.Contracts.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ChecksumCheckFailedException: checksum verification failed for database '.edb F:\Region 900 - Executive (ex2013) \Region 900 - Executive (ex2013) ' with '486' incompatibilities of checksum at Replay.Core.Implementation.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ExchangeDatabaseChecker.ThrowChecksumCheckfailedExceptionIfErrorLimitReached () at Replay.Core.Implementation.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ExchangeDatabaseChecker. <> cDisplayClass2.b0 () at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute ()---end of inner exception stack trace - at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Wait (Int32 millisecondsTimeout, CancellationToken, cancellationToken) at Replay.Core.Implementation.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.Jobs.DatabaseChecksumCheckJob.CheckDatabase () at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute () - end of inner---> System.AggregateException (Inner Exception #0) exception stack trace: one or more errors occurred. ---> Replay.Core.Contracts.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ChecksumCheckFailedException: checksum verification failed for database '.edb F:\Region 900 - Executive (ex2013) \Region 900 - Executive (ex2013) ' with '486' incompatibilities of checksum at Replay.Core.Implementation.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ExchangeDatabaseChecker.ThrowChecksumCheckfailedExceptionIfErrorLimitReached () at Replay.Core.Implementation.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ExchangeDatabaseChecker. <> cDisplayClass2.b0 () at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute ()---end of inner exception stack trace - at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Wait (Int32 millisecondsTimeout, CancellationToken, cancellationToken) at Replay.Core.Implementation.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.Jobs.DatabaseChecksumCheckJob.CheckDatabase () at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute ()---> (Inner Exception #0) Replay.Core.Contracts.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ChecksumCheckFailedException: checksum verification failed for database '.edb F:\Region 900 - Executive (ex2013) \Region 900 - Executive (ex2013) ' with '486' incompatibilities of checksum at Replay.Core.Implementation.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ExchangeDatabaseChecker.ThrowChecksumCheckfailedExceptionIfErrorLimitReached () at Replay.Core.Implementation.Exchange.ChecksumChecks.ExchangeDatabaseChecker . <> cDisplayClass2.b0 (System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute ())<><>
I saw an article in tech on a similar issue with Exchange 2013 that had me change the registry (support.software.dell.com/.../127986), but that doesn't seem to help.
Any ideas what I can check why the checksum fails? I also disabled the mountability control because it took MUCH too long and interfere with other work. Not sure if this is related or not.
The Reg is step 2, step 1 have you tried?
-
Exchange Server 2013 - to name
I encounter the following problem with the exchange server.
One user, automatically receives all e-mails that pass through the Organization on behalf of 'Microsoft Outlook'.
Even if we receive an email, he gets a message on behalf of M.O. with attached to the email, or even users sends and email
inside and outside the Organization, the same thing happens.
Hello
Your question is beyond the scope of this community.
I suggest that repost you your Question in Exchange for TechNet Forums.
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Office/en-us/home?category=ExchangeServer
Or here:
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgeneral
See you soon.
-
Control bug on Exchange Server 2013 error: Microsoft-Windows-WER-SystemErrorReporting
Log name: System
Source: Microsoft-Windows-WER-SystemErrorReporting
Date: 01/03/2015-21:27
Event ID: 1001
Task category: no
Level: error
Keywords: Classic
User: n/a
Computer: exch13 - 02.domain.com
Description:
The computer was restarted after a bugcheck. The bugcheck was: 0x000000ef (0xffffe000f9bfc080, 0 x 0000000000000000, 0 x 0000000000000000, 0 x 0000000000000000). A dump was saved in the: C:\Windows\MEMORY. DMP. Report ID: 030115-27921-01.
The event XML:
http://schemas.Microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> 1001 0 2 0 0 0 x 80000000000000 36389 System exch13-02. SC. ESILICON.com 0x000000ef (0xffffe000f9bfc080, 0 x 0000000000000000, 0 x 0000000000000000, 0 x 0000000000000000)
C:\Windows\MEMORY. DMP
030115 27921-01
It is preferable if youpost your query in the Forums of Tecnet
TechNet forums.
-
Connector Exchange 2013 for IOM 9102 BP 20
Hello
Currently, we have IOM 9102 BP 20 and an exchange (version of the Microsoft Exchange Connector 9.1.1.5) connector in place to support Exchange 2010. Oracle certifies that used connector supports the exchange of 2013?
Help, please...
Thanks in advance
Certified check article in Exchange Connector documentation deployment configurations. You will get the answer to your question.
Thank you
Patricia
-
Installation of POS 6 Exchange 2013 plugin - current user is not a domain administrator
I installed Exchange SP1 2013 (current patch level). I'm tying to install the plug-in by vmware-data-protection-administration-guide-60.pdf, Exchange age 169. VMware VDP Exchange Backup tool for configuring the user start and tells me "the current user is not a domain administrator" (see screenshot). I am connected to the machine using credentials a domain administrator, not the local computer. The Exchange sever, Storage group, Mailbox store drop-down lists are empty, apparently a problem of authority.
The talks on creating a VDPBackupUser account manually KB creating a VMware vSphere backup user account Data Protection (WTP) Exchange plugin with Advanced VDP (2073168). Before I trot in this way, I thought I'd see if there is anything obvious or that I ran out of base.
Problem solved. Setup VMware VDP backup user tool must be "Run as administrator...". "I must have missed that in the doc
In addition, notes in the log (the configuration tool dialog box) that the created account VMwareVDPBackUser (mailbox) must be connected to (at least once) to complete the configuration. I use OWA to open a session.
The VMware install document talks about the user VDPBackupUser. The user created by this process is VMwareVDPBackupUser.
-
Verification of Rediness 2013 Exchange makes the crash esxi5.5
Hello guys,.
I just want to know if someone has tried also to test Exchange 2013 and gives my ESXi5.5 crash.
DELL PowerEdge R410 16 GB RAM 300 GB x 3 HARD drive with Intel Xeon [email protected] with VMware vmvisor ESXi5.5 installed
Guest operating system
1 PDC - R2 Windows Server 2012
2 EXCH - R2 Windows Server 2012
Creation of the guest operating system is not questions but after installation of Exchange Server 2013 preparedness control makes the crash ESXi5.5 I do not know why on ESXi5.5 makes a problem
but I have also created an environment using VMware Workstation 10.0.1 and no problems, I was able to install exchange successfully.
Any idea... what could be the cause of crashing on the exsi5.5?
Any suggestions will help and appreciated.
Currently, I reformatted my DELL R410 and erase all data on the HARD drive. and start working on it again...
Thanking for all,.
Andro Ruan
What type of virtual NETWORK card do you use for your 2012 R2 VM? E1000 and E1000e by chance?
Duco
-
Resource booking reports Exchange room
Hi all
Would appreciate help if there is a way to generate a booking room (resource) reports. We have several rooms in our Organization and my bosses want to know the use of these rooms.
The rooms are configured as resources in our Exchange Server (2013). I don't see any option in the administrative center. I tried looking for a third-party software, but could not find as well.
Hope to hear from you guys!
Post in the Forums of Exchange Server:
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?category=exchangeserve -
I'm trying to get a site to site VPN working between two routers RV110W, obviously in different places with different public IPs and different internal addressed IP networks.
For some reason, the IPsec Security Association gets 'established', but no traffic will travel between the two.
I use the "basic VPN setup" on routers and type in their respective information below.
Public IP have been replaced by x.x.x.x.
Router A:
Connection: - name -.
Key: - PSK-
IP / domain FULL: - public IP address of the remote site.
Local WAN: - local WAN.
Remote LAN: 10.151.238.0
Remote mask: 255.255.255.0
Local NETWORK: 10.151.237.0
Local mask: 255.255.255.0
Router b:
Connection: - name -.
Key: - PSK-
IP / domain FULL: - public IP address of the remote site.
Local WAN: - local WAN.
Remote LAN: 10.151.237.0
Remote mask: 255.255.255.0
Local NETWORK: 10.151.238.0
Local mask: 255.255.255.0
I am very confused.
Site A:
Public IP address
10.151.237.0/24 network
Cisco VPN Firewall RV110W
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'x.x.x.x\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: the proposed peer: 10.151.237.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.238.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: response to a proposal of fast Mode {msgid:6ecb39e8}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: us: 10.151.237.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.238.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0x2fadc90d ESP tunnel mode<0xa6393cfc xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.164.121\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp proposal d = AES (12) msgid:0779895 #3 _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0x8d260557 mode<0xad4da835 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0x8d260557 mode<0xad4da835 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:53 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request for e0: c9:7 has: 7 a: 3d:2 b b8:62:1f:51:ad:a9 BSSID
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: e0:c9:7 a: 7 a: 3d:2 b IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:ad:a9
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: received REQUEST from E0:C9:7 A: 7 A: 3D:2 B
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.237.5
' 2013-07-11 16:17:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_R2
2013-07-11 16:17:43 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: INFORMATION from 38:60:77:13:C0:48
Site B:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public IP address
10.151.238.0/24 network
Cisco VPN Firewall RV110W
2013-07-11 16:13:11 RV110W daemon.info httpd [22952]: Administrator 10.151.238.201 logined
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. PFKEY open, create socket 19
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: 1success is enabled
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: NAT-Traversal port 4500 floating off setting
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: port floating nat_t activation criteria = 0/port_float = 1
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version 0.6 c) [disabled]
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC_SSH of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_SERPENT_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_AES_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_BLOWFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_512 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_256 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: commissioning 1 cryptographic support
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6789]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: begun assistance pid = 6789 (fd:5)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface using Linux 2.6 IPsec on 2.6.22 code (experimental code)
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: Ok (ret = 0) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change directory \'/etc/ipsec.d/crls\'
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: empty directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: listen to IKE messages
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface ppp0/ppp0 10.151.238.200:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface br0/br0 10.151.238.1:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface eth1: 0 / eth1: 0 127.0.0.3:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface adding vlan2/vlan2 x.x.x.x:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. PFKEY 18 failed: no such file or directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: forget the secrets
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ': termination of SAs by using this connection
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: removal of State (STATE_MAIN_I2)
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\": removal of connection
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp #2 msgid:6ecb39e8 = AES proposal (12) _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: the proposed peer: 10.151.238.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.237.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: respond to the Quick Mode proposal {msgid:0779895 d}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: us: 10.151.238.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.237.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: keep refhim = 4294901761 to the course to generate a new key
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0xad4da835 ESP tunnel mode<0x8d260557 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:16:43 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request a BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72 cc:af:78:60:9e:9
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: cc:af:78:60:9e:9 a IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 A
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.105
2013-07-11 16:18:52 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:20:15 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST for 00:01:80:5 C: 98:B9
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.101
2013-07-11 16:13:11 RV110W daemon.info httpd [22952]: Administrator 10.151.238.201 logined
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. PFKEY open, create socket 19
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: 1success is enabled
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: NAT-Traversal port 4500 floating off setting
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: port floating nat_t activation criteria = 0/port_float = 1
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version 0.6 c) [disabled]
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC_SSH of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_SERPENT_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_AES_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_BLOWFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_512 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_256 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: commissioning 1 cryptographic support
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6789]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: begun assistance pid = 6789 (fd:5)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface using Linux 2.6 IPsec on 2.6.22 code (experimental code)
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: Ok (ret = 0) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): activation
: FAILURE (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change directory \'/etc/ipsec.d/crls\'
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: empty directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: listen to IKE messages
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface ppp0/ppp0 10.151.238.200:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface br0/br0 10.151.238.1:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface eth1: 0 / eth1: 0 127.0.0.3:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface adding vlan2/vlan2 x.x.x.x:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. PFKEY 18 failed: no such file or directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: forget the secrets
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ': termination of SAs by using this connection
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: removal of State (STATE_MAIN_I2)
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\": removal of connection
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp #2 msgid:6ecb39e8 = AES proposal (12) _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '\x.x.x.x\ '.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: the proposed peer: 10.151.238.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.237.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: respond to the Quick Mode proposal {msgid:0779895 d}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: us: 10.151.238.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.237.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: keep refhim = 4294901761 to the course to generate a new key
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0xad4da835 ESP tunnel mode<0x8d260557 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:16:43 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request a BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72 cc:af:78:60:9e:9
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: cc:af:78:60:9e:9 a IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 A
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.105
2013-07-11 16:18:52 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:20:15 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST for 00:01:80:5 C: 98:B9
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.101
Please help if you can.
Aaron,
When the tunnel is up, you can ping the LAN IP of the remote router? What type of traffic you are trying to send? What equipment and what device?
If you are trying to reach a PC through the tunnel, be sure that there is no firewall software blocking traffic between a different LAN. Repeatedly PCs will respond to connections on the same network, but not to a different subnet.
Please give us more information about what devices are involved and what they try to do.
-Marty
-
Upgrading Exchange 2013 standard to enterprise
Hi all
One of my servers Exchange 2013 (OS 2012) is set to standard, and I like to upgrade to enterprise edition. Standard server is limited me 5 database that can be created when I upgrade the company will lose the database which are mounted? and what is the easiest way to get there?
Kelly
Hello
Please post your question in TechNet forums to help Exchange 2013 to upgrade to the Enterprise edition.
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home
Maybe you are looking for
-
Skype crash just after the connection
Hello Skype crashes just after that I have sign inn approximately 2 sec after a few times too 10 sec until it started a day and a half... doesn't look as if it was a local problem, since I can't sign inn on any pc or phone spit just after 1-2 sec eve
-
Hello I have a problem with the instalation win 8 of the USB on my HP ENVY 4-1120ew device. Installator cannot detect my hard drive and want some drivers. I already downloaded the drivers from the hp site but the computer can not yet see their. downl
-
How to prevent users from changing the network connection?
Hi all I have a weird problem. I set up my HP ThinPro T610, I have to say is simple enough. I want users just to turn on the computer, wait a few minutes and log into the Terminal Server Services on the Server RDP connection, so I basically blocked e
-
Advice on the acquisition of trigger using the bridge of strain cRIO module
Hi all! I quote a project of collecting the values of a single lane of a constraint NOR-9236 bridge module. I need to view and draw a large number of curves over time, and I'll try to find the best way to trigger the acquisition. It is the first proj
-
Capture of frequency with the NI 9401 in cDAQ-9172
Hi all I searched through all the examples and find the same results than my own code in Labview. So, I go back to my hardware to solve my problem. I use a digital tachometer that displays pulse with 2 wires (hot and ground). I connected these to the