filtering of noise over 200 kHz

Similar Questions

• Won't let me download anything not "enough disk space" when I have over 200 GB of available

  All of a sudden my late 2011 macbook pro does not allow me to download anything on the internet. It is said there is not enough free disk space to however I have over 200 GB of free. When I look at the internal drive and the drive macbook hard disk, it indicates that the hard disk is completely full when I run disk utility, but the only thing that I should have on my Mac hard drive that has plenty of space. Nothing seems to work. I tried to repair/correction of disk utility and it does not say there is a problem, but obviously something is not seriously. Help, please!

  If you try to add a large amount of data at once, and you receive an alert about the lack of space, then in the menu bar, select

   ▹ System Preferences... ▹ Time Machine

  If there is a padlock icon in the lower left corner of the preferences window, click on it to unlock the settings and to authenticate. Turn off the Machine time and then back on. Close the window.

  Restart the computer. Test.

• the myDAQ can record data at 200 kHz?

  Hi all

  The specifications of the myDAQ say he can enjoy at 200 kHz and has a size of memory 4000bits all about analog input buffer - how quickly transferred the contents of that buffer in the memory of the host computer? Can you connect actually almost to 200 kHz or overflow the buffer?

  Thanks in advance,

  Dan

  Hi Dan

  Sorry for the delay in answering your question.

  Yes the myDAQ can enjoy and transfer data at 200 kHz. The myDAQ is a 16-bit device, so at 200 kHz would be production 3200000 b/s of data. Even if we double to 32 bits to account for overhead in the transfer of data, we are still only consider ~0.8MB/s to transfer data between the device so that the buffer never overflows.

  The USB 2.0 standard defines a flow up to 35 MB/s, which makes it quite possible.

  Kind regards

• I want to remove all filters and start over. What file/folder I need to delete?

  The filters do not work properly and I've reconfigured several individual filters to try to make them work. I'm ready to restart from scratch, but do not want to remove 40-50 filters individually if there is a folder that I can easily access and delete.

  you have not clearly localized all instances of msgFilterRules.dat.

• Filtering of noise - OR 9361

  Hello everyone,

  I use a NI 9361 module to measure the speed of rotation of a shaft that rotates through an electric motor.

  I am faced with loud noises because of this electric motor; When I run it, my meter directly measure frequencies up to 1 MHz, even when my tree is not running. I can't see the same phenomena when I'm looking at the edge of counting results...

  I tried to use the pulse width filter inside my Labview application to filter the signal but I couldn't find anything sufficient.

  Anyone who has ever faced with this kind of question, and if so, is there a solution to cope?

  I thank of altogether.

  You use a shielded sensor connection?  You can also try to raise the level of signal on the 9361 threshold if you CSR.

• Filtering of noise signal to acquire sound

  On the labview 2011 I'm aquireing a sound of a microphone and the signal is chart and I can see the time 0 a small peak every time if it is solid or not and I have no idea where its origin or how to get rid of.

  After manipulation of the signal to try to get rid of noise signals and background this signal as well as my signals wanted to turn into a huge spikes which is a problem because I am trying to use it to acquire the location of a sound source by the time between these points later, when I have more than micophones but it keeps be wrong this time epi 0 as a sound when there is an error

  any ideas?

  What is a single-point peak? If so, it's just to say the part of the program to ignore the time value = 0 (or replace with the value for the second time).

  Cameron

• How to remove the old compressed files? I have over 200,000.

  After being run-up disk cleanup, I show more than 200,000 old compressed files.  How can I remove them?

  You delete a file compressed just the way that you remove any other file, BUT...

  You can't really delete these 'compressed old files.  By default, in Windows XP Disk Cleanup tool will compress files that have not been used for 50 days.  Well, you can keep the files to which you have not accessed in the past two months.

  You can change the disk cleanup period is used to determine if a file is 'old'--> http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows/make-disk-cleanup-compress-olderor-newer-files-on-xp/

  However, many people (including me) just disable the analysis of "old files" because it is run much faster disk cleanup: see, for example,--> http://www.pctools.com/forum/showthread.php?49060-Disable-Compress-Old-Files-in-Disk-cleanup or http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm straight line 48 (notice that there are two links, one to turn off "compress old files" and the other for him re - allow to) those reg files also change how Disk Cleanup deals by default temporary files - temporary files accessed during the 7 days are not deleted; the first files reg Kelly happening in 0 days and the file "undo" restores the default value of 7 days).

• How priviledge 'noise' over the sounds of "tonal"?

  Hi all

  I want to priviledge noise (like breathing) on the audio content (e.g. humming or singing) in a track. Basically, I want to filter the audio in order to have, if possible, than the noise signal and not of its 'tonal '.

  Is this possible with reliability? Any suggestions on a filter and settings to use?

  The audio track that I use is a professional recording of a performance of the vocal ensemble (8-10 people) on stage (a church).

  I have only the basics in Adobe Audition, any help is useful!

  Thank you!

  Stefan

  Well, I watched/listened to, and for me, the answer seems pretty obvious. What you need to do, it is view spectral helps isolate the last rest of tonal, then remove them. Now I think it should be relatively easy to do, as they will stand out a bit by being short horizontal lines into something that will be varying amounts of breathing 'noise' with no tonal components at all. When you can see them, they should be relatively easy to paint outside.

  However, this work would be one) easier and b) almost certainly more effective if it was made using iZotope RX5. This is not to denigrate the hearing the least - it's just that this kind of treatment is what RX5 was specifically designed to do, and it has other tools that make the spectral editing work spectacularly well!

• Playback is choppy / slow everything accelerating clip anything over 200 percent

  Ive from using Final Cut Pro X for awhile, just bought myself a new laptop.

  Basic specifications are:

  Intel i7 2.8 ghz to 3.8 ghz turbo 3840QM

  32 GB of Ram 1600 mhz

  1 TB SATA 7200 RPM in Raid 0

  GTX680M GeForce 2Go

  Long story short, I've been a fan of long date PC all my life even if using mac only for video editing and a macbook pro 13 "basis with final cut pro x seem to surpass my newly acquired PC laptop.

  I bought this laptop with the intention to put my video to a State of PC platform and with the new first cs6.

  everything is smooth and all that, but the same question that I remembered on the first, back when I wanted to try in time of cs3. for the preview video playback is slow and jerky.

  I always have to "rendering" my video just to preview smoothly, which is very time consuming. I always thought that because back in the day my laptop was not as good as my new one now so was the question and moves on my mac which was great for video editing only.

  but mac has specifications of base compared to my new laptop and the preview is always impeccable and smooth with LIVE video preview. I mean I can do variations in duration of the slowdown of 10% speed all the way to 1000% of the speed ups and watch my video of this very moment after.

  but with first if I do either time frame transmissions more then 200% original accelerates that he plays very well for 2 seconds which accelerates the speed then becomes slow and jerky.

  I even changed the resolution of 1/4 of quality reading, and I get the same question.

  I wouldn't mind waiting for rendering that I can see that smooth playback and to determine if I like it or not, except when making my clips of my gopro recording at 60 fps 1080, it takes more than 15 minutes.

  He always seemed to be a problem with first for me and wonder if there is something I'm missing here...

  someone at - it point me the right direction?

  im not hating on PC or adobe at all, I like these two platforms in all directions, but when it comes to this edition, all I hear is good things about them, but when I use it for me its very frustrating.

  P.S. Yes, I put my GPU to use the GPU accelerated to mercury that makes little difference with fineness of reading.

  PR is not optimized for the new stuff from GoPro.  Since FCP transcodes the video on interference, you may need to do the same thing with the Pr for this type of images.  You can use Adobe Media Encoder to transcode your images in batches to intermediate codec.

  Jeff

• I am trying to clean my PC and improve performance. I have over 200 subfolders in Windows and was wondering if I could remove.

  The records are all very similar to this... $NtUninstallKB887742$

  You can remove the $NTUninstallK folders [some number] (and ONLY these folders) with the understanding that you will be is no longer able to uninstall updates in Windows that are associated with each file. However, unless you have a very small hard drive and are seriously cramped for space, deleting this files is probably something to speed up your computer. If your hard drive, it's that small it would be better to just buy a bigger hard drive because they are so cheap these days.

  Some reasons for the slow pace of the computer:

  1. computer has not been maintained - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Maintenance

  2. the computer is infected with the malware - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Removing_Malware
  3. the disk is too full. Remove useless stuff, uninstall unused programs. Do not forget to save!
  http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Backing_Up

  4. flaky third party software. Toolbars and modules are particularly guilty in this area. Uninstall toolbars (Google, Yahoo, ISP brand, etc) and look at what modules are in use in your browser (s).

  5. computer has too many unnecessary programs/processes running in the background. Manage your Startup:

  For XP - How to troubleshoot using the Msconfig in Windows XP utility - http://support.microsoft.com/?id=310560
  The free Autoruns program is very useful for managing your Startup - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/default.mspx
  6. the user runs an inflated/invasive such as Norton and McAfee antivirus program. Replace it with a better program. I recommend NOD32 (commercial) or Avast (free). Avira is also good, but the free version has an unpleasant reminder screen (Google for instructions on how to disable it). The user can also run several real-time antivirus/firewall/security programs.

  7. the user has installed new programs that are processor and/or memory-intensive (Photoshop, AutoCAD, Mathmatica or similar) and does not have the power of the equipment.

  8 drive fails and is in PIO Mode. It's very much slow (like being in 1985). See Hans-Georg Michna information here:
  http://winhlp.com/?q=node/10

  In addition to the above, also see http://miekiemoes.blogspot.com/2008/02/help-my-computer-is-slow.html MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Storage device does not. Computer ask me to format it before that I can use it.__The device worked fine before and has over 200 G of files it contains.

  My seagate expansion drivre has been brilliant so far. Last night I opened the properties and I check the box that says "compress files to save disk space" or something like that. Since I could not open the damn thing. If I try to open a window telling me that I need to fomat the disc in this drive (F) until I can use it. I can't findout how to cancel compression of files and I don't want to format the drive because I think that will delete all my files. I think that the compression of the files can be called "Zipper" and I need to extract, but I can't find any option to do this. Can anyone help? If I didn't leave enough information please ask what you need to know that I will answer as soon as POSSIBLE.

  Test your player:
  http://www.Seagate.com/www/en-us/support/downloads/SeaTools

  Read the entire thread:
  The disk in drive F is not formatted. Want to format it now?
  http://www.TechSpot.com/VB/topic34363.html

  I hope I could help

• 6035-E high frequency noise reduces the resolution of 14 bits.

  Dear Technical Support Group OR and MF DAQ,

  I don't get the complete 16-bit on my DAQ 6035 - E cards and 6034-E resolution because of the high frequency noise.
  The Test Panel and the actual catches show 1.2 mV peak-to-peak noise with entries is is failed the GA right input in differential ended mode and single connector - Test Panel screen grab and connector attached picture.
  With a range of +-10V, noise LSB + half expected specified in the manual should be only 305 microvolts (20/65536) which is four times less than what I see.
  So far, I've been scanning (a channel) to ten times (60 KHz) the rate I need (6 KHz), then SavGol the filtering and sampling downstairs.
  The problem is that I need to sweep the four channels that now exceeds the capacity of 200 KHz of the card and also results in huge quantities of useless data.

  Have considered buying a new USB DAQ with better record, I fear that all products OR suffer the same flaws and gave the purchase.

  Please, share your ideas.

  Thank you.

  GPSman salvation,

  Looking at your control panel test plot, it would seem that there is a discrete steps on your axis is between - 0.0019 and - 0.0012 or 700 µV.  Then you can see that there is about a little more than 2 discrete steps to your signal, which brings value to about 300 microvolts, exactly as the resolution makes clear.

  You can also find that there is a specification of noise and precision in specification.  You can find for a single point, the accuracy in the +/-10V between 1,085 millivolt.  This is on page 4.  This would allow your signal of +/-1 mV of the expected value, the test also indicating panels.

  Does that help?

  best,

• High speed continuous measurement of encoder with sampling frequency of 1 kHz

  I am able at all times the position of a linear encoder using a PCI-6602 counter card, and I need to know how to set up so that the counter rotating at high speed, but the data is inserted into the buffer at a frequency of 1 kHz.  I am able suddenly to a hydraulic cylinder, and I am not concerned about the event recording to high frequency except to the extent where they throw off the number considerably if the equipment does not run fast enough to detect all the impulses of the encoder.

  Now, I think is that the external sample clock signal control (routed internal pulse output counter) time rate whereby the equipment detects the impulses of the encoder and the rate at which it inserts data into the buffer.  With a pulse 100 per inch encoder and a sampling frequency of 1 kHz, the extended final position of the cylinder is turned off by +/-0.15 inches, which is unacceptable.

  I need calculate a speed of this information, so I prefer not to use software timed sampling to control this (it's more difficult programming for other reasons as well - several asynchronous measures).  Any ideas on how to configure the hardware to count faster than the speed at which she inserts counties in the buffer?

  OK, you're clearly on the right track here, so I will focus on some details.

  1. How do you know that the +/-0.15 "differences are * measurement error rather than * error of movement?  Why wouldn't be an accurate measure and a proposal which can vary slightly from the nominal value?

  2. I wonder some all electric noise and defects that may produce false edges.  The fact that the behavior was better by using a sampling rate limited (200 kHz) in the digital inputs may be that some of these flaws were so short that they were never captured.

  I did a ton of work with the Commission to 6602 encoder and I can certainly confirm that count equipment is sensitive to the edges in a few tens of MHz.  (I know its 80 MHz for edge counting, but I think I remember that it can be of the order of 20 to 40 MHz to accommodate the time of signal propagation extra of the quadrature decoding circuit).

  A small point of clarification.  You're talking about the speed at which the meter "works to.  The value of count is a register whose value is changed completely by the circuit, * independent * of the sampling frequency.  If you enjoy with material-clocked County in memory buffer or interrogation of software without buffer not a bit for circuits that increments / decrements the value of the counter register.  (In other words, I am completely convinced that you would get commensurate with position end even if you took only 1 sample software-polled after the end of the move instead of sampling at 1 kHz all the way through.)

  So, if the value of the counter is disabled, it is because the circuit detects producers of County of the edges that shouldn't be there.  Something you can try is to set up digital debounce filter for input lines of the PFI corresponding to the encoder Source inputs and to the.

  -Kevin P.

• 6, 9.3.2 iPhone version, 88 GB available. more than 200 tickets disappeared, cannot be found, any suggestions?

  IPhone 6, 9.3.2 version, 88 GB available, over 200 tickets just disappeared. Any suggestions?

  Perryg31 wrote:

  IPhone 6, 9.3.2 version, 88 GB available, over 200 tickets just disappeared. Any suggestions?

  Synchronize your notes with some program email or icloud you synchronize with.

• function generator (HP 33120) running to the superior at 1 kHz by Labview

  Hi all

  To run a function HP 33120 Labview generator, I downloaded a driver "Agilent 33XXX Series", also attached to this message. But the files of vi (for example 'Waveform.vi Standard' or "Arbitrary Waveform.vi") available in this driver, do not allow the function generator generations a more signal of 1 kHz, while I need about 200 kHz. Manually the function generator can easily generate a signal to 15 MHz.

  So I need a pilot/vi of this function generator that can generate a signal to about 200 kHz. Kindly help me.

  Thanks in advance

  Concerning

  Fadi

  Dear Dennis

  I think I had hardware problem where I was able to change the frequency of 1000 Hz and 999Hz and so one but I was unable to move from 1000 Hz to 1001hz and so on. But now it is resolved.

  Thanks again