FlexVPN and QoS on tunnels

Similar Questions

• HP 18-n208tx: controller Bus SM and Microsoft Teredo Tunneling adapted

  I'm looking for a driver for the "SM Bus controller
  "PCI VEN_8086 & DEV_9C22 & SUBSYS_2166103C & REV_04 and"Microsoft Teredo Tunneling adapter"
  HP 15-n208tx for Windows 7 64-bit.

  Hello:

  You need this driver for smbus controller...

  http://h20564.www2.HP.com/hpsc/SWD/public/detail?sp4ts.Oid=7834518&swItemId=ob_156348_1&swEnvOid=4059

  Please read this forum link for some ideas on how to deal with the Microsoft Teredo Tunneling adapter:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-hardware/Microsoft-Teredo-tunneling-adapter-driver/258390f0-AC36-4A1F-b30e-55b81b9067fa?auth=1

• Internet access with VPN Client to ASA and full effect tunnel

  I'm trying to migrate our concentrator at our new 5520 s ASA. The concentrator has been used only for VPN Client connections, and I have not the easiest road. However, I, for some reason, can't access to internet through our business network when I've got profiles with lots of tunneling.

  I've included the configuration file, with many public IP information and omitted site-to-site tunnels. I left all the relevant stuff on tunnel-groups and group strategies concerning connectivity of VPN clients. The range of addresses that I use for VPN clients is 172.16.254.0/24. The group, with what I'm trying to access the internet "adsmgt" and the complete tunnel to our network part is fine.

  As always, any help is appreciated. Thank you!

  Hüseyin... good to see you come back.. bud, yes try these Hüseyin sugesstiong... If we looked to be ok, we'll try a different approach...

  IM thinking too, because complete tunnel is (no separation) Jim ASA has to go back for the outbound traffic from the internet, a permit same-security-traffic intra-interface, instruction should be able to do it... but Jim start by Hüseyin suggestions.

  Rgds

  Jorge

• VoIP QoS for Tunnel from Site to Site

  Hi all

  I need help to configure QoS for VoIP between two Cisco ASA 5505 with VPN Site to Site.

  There is no need for bandwidth reservation, only 46 (EF) DSCP should be higher and DSCP 26 second queue higher and rules apply only to a site to site VPN.

  Usually, I try to configure the ASAs via ASDM and discovered in the documentation Cisco how configure QoS DSCP bits with a Service policy and how to configure QoS for a VPN from Site to Site (rule Service-> Match traffic strategy). But how to configure QoS for a bit DSCP applies to Tunnel from Site to Site? And how configure different priorities for both DSCP bits, this is defined by the order of political Service?

  The quality of service must be activated on the two ASAs to inside interface?

  Thanks in advance

  Tobias

  Like most-

  class-map voice_traffic
  match dscp ef
  match dscp 26

• PIX OS 6.3 and QoS

  Hi all.

  As far as I know, Cisco IOS allows (by default) to copy the IP ToS of the packet header values in the header of the tunnel when you use an IPSec tunnel. But the PIX 6.x software version do the same? I would like to configure QoS on my PIX firewall, but it seems that version 6.3 does not support QoS. Maybe at least it can copy ToS in the header of the tunnel?

  Thank you.

  Yes, the Pix copy the TOS value in the header of the tunnel during encapsulation. You must use version 5.2 (1) and higher.

  For more details, see the Bug ID CSCdr41431 and Release Notes.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/PIX/pix52/release/notes/pixrn521.html

  Let me know if it helps.

  Kind regards

  Arul

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• VPN AND REMOTE NETWORKS TUNNELS

  Having problems become place SEW to connect you to the location of the SERVER @ HOM

  I think ideally the RVS4000 should be at location HOM

  I tried to configure static routes to HOM sewing, but they never show in the Routing Table

  I tried to enable RIP on all 3 routers

  Here is my set up

  CDM - SBS 2008 accommodation location
  RVL200LAN 192.168.0.1 - no DHCP
  VPN for GROUND location

  GROUND location
  RVS4000LAN 192.168.1.1 - DHCP
  SEW the VPN for HOM location and location

  SEW the location

  RVL200 192.168.2.1 - DHCP

  VPN for GROUND location

  Any help would be great

  Configure a VPN between SEW and HOM tunnel.

  These routers implement regular IPSec tunnels. IPSec tunnels only packages that exactly match the remote and local security groups. You cannot route packets to SEW by GROUND HOM. A package of SEW HOM has source IP * 192.168.2 and destination IP address 192.168.0. *. This does not match your VPN tunnel between 192.168.2. * and 192.168.1. *. So your access attempt is also sent in the clear on the internet.

  You must configure a VPN tunnel. There's no other choice. These IPSec tunnels do not have routable interfaces.

• Limit my bandwidth downloading the applications using the API to control traffic and QoS

  I used QoS and Traffic Control API as TcAddFlow and TcAddFilter to control my bandwidth usage download applications.

  We manipulate TC_GEN_FLOW, to send and receive FLOWSPEC parameters.

  Now, I want to set the exact limit to 5 Mbps, what are the value that I need to set for TokenBucketSize and TokenRate to limit bandwidth to 5 Mbps FLOWSPEC structure?

  Code snippet:

  newFlow-> ReceivingFlowspec.DelayVariation = QOS_NOT_SPECIFIED;
  newFlow-> ReceivingFlowspec.Latency = QOS_NOT_SPECIFIED;
  newFlow-> ReceivingFlowspec.MaxSduSize = QOS_NOT_SPECIFIED;
  newFlow-> ReceivingFlowspec.MinimumPolicedSize = QOS_NOT_SPECIFIED;
  newFlow-> ReceivingFlowspec.PeakBandwidth = POSITIVE_INFINITY_RATE;
  newFlow-> ReceivingFlowspec.ServiceType = SERVICETYPE_NETWORK_CONTROL;
  newFlow-> ReceivingFlowspec.TokenBucketSize = ?;
  newFlow-> ReceivingFlowspec.TokenRate =?;

  newFlow-> SendingFlowspec.DelayVariation = QOS_NOT_SPECIFIED;
  newFlow-> SendingFlowspec.Latency = QOS_NOT_SPECIFIED;
  newFlow-> SendingFlowspec.MaxSduSize = QOS_NOT_SPECIFIED;
  newFlow-> SendingFlowspec.MinimumPolicedSize = QOS_NOT_SPECIFIED;
  newFlow-> SendingFlowspec.PeakBandwidth = POSITIVE_INFINITY_RATE;
  newFlow-> SendingFlowspec.ServiceType = SERVICETYPE_NETWORK_CONTROL;
  newFlow-> SendingFlowspec.TokenBucketSize =?;
  newFlow-> SendingFlowspec.TokenRate =?;

  Thank you & best regards

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum
  
  
  If you give us a link to the new thread we can point to some resources it

• Device cannot start. ISATAP and Microsoft Teredo Tunneling adapter card code 10.

  original title: hardware device

  Hi I have a problem with my pc in Device Manager, it is said.

  Map Microsoft ISATAP. This device cannot start. (Code 10)

  Map Microsoft ISATAP #2. This device cannot start. (Code 10)

  Microsoft Teredo Tunneling adapter. This device cannot start. (Code 10)

  I tried update driver software and when I do this it says that windows has determined the driver software for your device is up to date. So can someone give me some advice please.

  THANKS IN ADVANCE

  Hi macandy2010,

  Run the Fixit in KB 943104. This should solve the problems of Code 10.

• PnP and Microsoft Teredo Tunneling adapter networking-related problems, error code: 10

  I've had this problem for awhile now. A user on Windows 7 Help Forums also helps me with this problem. My tunneling adapter throws Code 10. I tried to update the driver software, but it is said that he decided that my software for this device is up to date. My Internet connection works fine. Microsoft Help, with Maxie's help with the other forums site would be greatly appreciated.

  Hi Jesse,.

  Please keep us updated on the status of the issue.

  We are troubleshooting problem Launch Manager.

  I did some research on this issue and found that, if the device driver is updated in an appropriate manner, and then Launch Manager may stop working correctly.

  So I would say as a work around update you all the device in Device Manager driver and check if it helps.

  Hope the helps of information.

  Please reply with the results, in order to help you solve the problem.

  Thank you

  Very well. I reinstalled it, and so far it worked for 2 days and a half. So, I hope that it continues to work. If it isn't, then I will do what you suggested.

  Thanks for your help,

  Jesse Williams

• bandwidth and QOS

  Hi guys,.

  I get a line of lease 20Mbps between two offices and it connects two cisco C4507R switches. I have configured the QOS on the two switches, and I know the QOS will take effect when the network congestion occurs. But the ports that connect the rental displays 100 Mbps on the switch. So I configured 'bandwidth 20480' command in the ports, if this will help active QOS when the network stream is up to 20Mbps?

  my command under the interface:

  interface GigabitEthernet1/38

  No switchport
  bandwidth 20480
  IP 10.81.16.4 255.255.255.248
  service-policy output QOS - SH

  Disclaimer

  The author of this announcement offers the information in this publication without compensation and with the understanding of the reader that there is no implicit or explicit adequacy or adaptation to any purpose. Information provided is for information purposes only and should not be interpreted as making the professional advice of any kind. Use information from this announcement is only at risk of the reader.

  RESPONSIBILITY

  Any author will be responsible for any wha2tsoever of damage and interest (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profits) arising out of the use or inability to use the information in the view even if author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

  Poster

  Your 4500 QoS will only engage when the interface clutter.

  What you need is a shaper with QoS support, that can match bandwidth your provider.

  Unfortunately, this is not a feature of the 4500 series.

• (Between Cisco and Fortigate) IPsec tunnel question

  Hi all

  Im trying to install an IPsec site-to-site between 2 different routers (Cisco 3750 and Fortigate 100a) (R1 & Fortigate100A)

  IPsec, the whole scenario works with the installation.

  But unfortunately the tunnel (between R1 & Fortigate100A) IPsec does not work.

  (Pls look at the attached jpg file)

  The message is received in routers are shown below:

  Cisco: R1:

  % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_MODE_FAILURE: fast mode processing failed with the peer to 192.168.43.75

  FortiGate 100A:

  IKE 0: none established HIS IKE for informational type of d18e1af773e658b9/192.168.43.195:500->192.168.43.75 Exchange 3 cookie d3695c6cea17475a, don't drop

  IKE 0:Cisco - P1:6899: authentication OK

  IKE 0: none established HIS IKE for informational type of d18e1af78ed17bf9/192.168.43.195:500->192.168.43.75 Exchange 3 cookie 414bd35ab92bc4ef, don't drop

  IKE 0:Cisco - P1:6899:Cisco - P2:14802: failure of negotiating quick mode due to the delay of new attempt IKE 0:Cisco - P1:6900: authentication OK

  I configured both routers as follows:

  Cisco:

  HostName:R1

  ISAKMP policy 1

  Hash: sha

  Authentication: pre-shared

  Encryption: AES128

  DH group: 2

  Life 86400

  ISAKMP Key: cisco1 address 192.168.43.75

  Crypto IPsec transform-set esp - aes and hmac-sha-esp RIGHT

  Access-list: 101 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255

  Map R1_to_Fortigate100A 10 IPsec-Isakmp crypto

  defined by peers: 192.168.43.75

  Mailing address 101

  The value transformset: RIGHT

  int fa # 0 / 0 Crypto map R1_to_Fortigate100A

  FortiGate:

  HostName: Fortigate100A

  Phase 1:

  Preshared key: cisco1

  The remote gateway ip address: 192.168.43.195

  mode: aggressive

  Accept any pair

  Proposal P1:

  AES 128 / SHA1

  AES 192 / SHA1

  AES192/SHA 256

  DH: 2

  Keylife: 86400

  Phase2:

  AES 128 / SHA1

  AES 192 / SHA1

  AES192/SHA 256

  Keylife:86400

  Quick mode selector:

  Source address: 10.10.10.0/24

  Destination address: 192.168.43.0/24

  I will be very very very grateful if you informed of my faults possible a solution

  Happy new year

  Ministry of education

  For some time I messed with a fortigate, but I would try first to change the remote address of the phase 2 to 10.0.0,0/24. If this is the statement "interesting traffic", it does not match what you have on the Cisco. After that, try to change the phase 1 Ike mode to something else than "aggressive."

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Implementation of VLAN and QoS for VOIP on SG200-18

  We recently purchased the smart switch SG200-18 to replace a Netgear switch. We are moving our phone service to VOIP through our local ISP as well.

  I currently have the VOIP phone plugged into Port 17 on SG200-18 (it is a Grandstream Cordless VOIP phone).

  I want to put the VOIP phone on one VLAN separate from the rest of the network and optimize QoS parameters so that the VOIP phone has exceptional audio quality even during network traffic.

  Here are my questions:

  1. do I need to set anything on the type of port to Port 17 (because it resembles a shape any Combo port)?

  2. How can I do to isolate VOIP telephone it's own VLAN (I see the parameters VLANS and VLAN voice, not sure that one to use;) I've tried to set a VLAN and broke the Internet connectivity on the phone until I went and removed)?

  3. do I need to adjust the QoS settings to switch to better optimize the VOIP phone?

  Some additional questions about the GS200-18 in general:

  1. do I need to adjust the parameters of the system on the switch time? I am in the Central time.

  2. do I need to adjust the Green Ethernet/Energy Saving parameters or should I stay with the default settings?

  In addition, a couple of "getting started" questions for Cisco:

  1. I registered an account My Cisco. What should I do to register my switch with Cisco and associate with my My Cisco account?

  2. What are the benefits of purchasing a contract of Cisco Small Business support, and how much would it cost the SG200-18 (I ordered it from Provantage)? I'm curious to see if it's worth the money.

  Here's my 'features ':

  Switch: SG200-18

  VOIP phone: Grandstream DP715 and 710 handsets

  Plugged in: Port 17 on SG200-18

  Services: Internet Local (Direclynx)

  Type of connection: 3 m down / 500 k up DSL move to a future wireless connection that will give us higher speeds

  Backend VOIP provider: VOIP Innovations

  Router: Apple Airport Extreme AC model (all Macs and iOS devices and the OS X Server on the network, so I use the Apple router facilitates installation, because is not QoS, trying to QoS and VLAN in the switch)

  Thank you all!

  Hello

  I'll just go to the list again:

  1. sounds good in the port from the drop-down list. So can I just connect the VOIP phone and go with it, correct?

  Yes, just plug in ethernet combo port and it will work.

  2. is not an issue, but I agree, Apple likely isn't compatible QoS or VLAN.

  3. thanks for the info on time/NTP settings. If I wanted to go there and try to configure NTP, how much is it and what I have to do? I want to I can give it a quick try.

  To Setup NTP on the switch is quite simple.  Go to Administration > Time Settings > time system and check the boxes to activate the main clock Source (SNTP)

  Then go to the settings of the SNTP page and add a new entry with the IP address of an NTP server.  There is a list of available NTP servers here:

  http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/

  You must also ensure that the switches Administrative default gateway is set correctly (it must be set the to the default gateway, probably the most convenient airport) so the switch can contact the NTP server.  That option is set under Administration > Interface Management > Interface IPv4.  Change the user-defined default gateway and enter the IP address of your airport (or whatever your default gateway for your network)

  4 sounds good on the Green Ethernet settings. I'll leave it as default value.

  Yes, better to just let those unless you have weird problems with ports disconnect, who can sometimes be caused by Green Ethernet, but if there's nothing like leave it on and save a few watts.

  5 sounds good on does not need to attach my passage to my Cisco account. Should I fill out a form any registration of the product with Cisco before calling support?

  It is not a record for support.  The only thing we need you to do is to create a Cisco account, but you have already done this, so if/when you call in support, you just need your ID for Cisco (also called a CCOID sometimes) and the serial number of your switch.

  6. thanks for the info on the Service contract. Is it something that I would need to order directly from Cisco or I who would get my Cisco partner (Provantage)? After the three years is up, treat yourself to renewal or it just falls? Is there a certain amount of time I have to buy the Service Contract forward make me ineligible?

  Support contracts are purchased through a partner Cisco, or you can get them online for the CDW or Newegg for example.  Basically, you have until the expiry of your current aid for the purchase of a new contract.  For example, right now your switch comes with 1 year of technical support.  You can only buy a contract while it is still active.  Once your three-year contract is about to run out, you're in the same situation.  You can renew it before it expires, however if you leave is up, you will not be able to put a contract on it.  Contracts are not my specialty, however, so you can check with your partner for complete details.

  7. sounds good to how data use VOIP calls. His dislikes too. :-)

  I agree, a voice call is not much traffic.  What you have described you probably don't have problems, although of course I can't guarantee that.

  8. because it is from your provider and they specifically mentioned the VOIP, I would say that you'll be fine here.

  You had also placed on your airport using access point behind a router in small businesses.  I would like to say that it is possible, a large number of wireless routers have an option to put access point only mode or something like that, but you should check with Apple on how to do it.

  Insofar as a Small Business router if you decide to upgrade for the options VLAN or QoS, I would recommend the RV180, or perhaps the RV320.  Two of these models are available with or without wire depending on what you decide to do with the airport.

  I think I got all the questions, but if not just let me know,

  Christopher Ebert - Network Support Engineer

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• NAT, ASA, 2 neworks and a VPN tunnel

  Hello. I have a following question. I am trying to establish a VPN tunnel to a remote network used to be connected to our via a VPN tunnel. The problem is that the previous tunnel their share has been created for the x.x.x.x our coast network which will serve no more time a month, but is currently still active and used. As I'm trying to get this VPN tunnel as soon as possible without going through all the paperwork on the other side (political, don't ask) is it possible to make NAT of the new network in the network x.x.x.x for traffic through the VPN tunnel.

  Something like this:

  new network-> policy NAT in old x.x.x.x fork on ASA-> VPN tunnel to the remote network using x.x.x.x addresses

  It is possible to add the new policy, but sometimes it can conflict with the former.

• UCS and QoS

  Hello:

  The ecosystem of the UCS relies on a solution of aggregation of port to the i/o chassis, namely, FEX modules.

  The FEX modules are not fully featured switches. Nor do they have a political intelligence transfer at all. Instead, the FEX modules deploy approach "pinned" in which the descenders (those facing NIC in the Server Blade, LOM, mezzanine cards) are mapped to an uplink port (those who face a 6100 Interconnect fabric) to form what can be described as a group of aggregator.

  The result is a simplified approach to blade i/o in which traffic patterns are predictable and failover is deterministic. In addition, there is no need to configure STP because ports are sent in order to exclude any possibility of a loop connection.

  This having been said, there is some merit to the argument that this port aggregation design places a hole in the middle of a deployment of QoS for the scheduling of packets on the uplink to the 6100 of interconnection fabric ports is not done in a way that recognizes the priority?

  In order to develop a little more, one can have a VMware deployment and use NetIOC or maybe configure QoS on a 1000v switch (which uplink ports are mapped to a port on the VIC de Palo) and configure QoS on the VIC and then the 6100 Interconnect fabric. But, given that the FEX is not planning for traffic to the 6100 interconnection fabric on a priority basis, the deployment of QoS has a hole in the Middle, so to speak.

  Thoughts?

  Hello

  I posted an answer to your question here:

  http://bradhedlund.com/2010/12/08/Cisco-UCS-fabric-Extender-FEX-QoS/

  I hope this helps.

  See you soon,.

  Brad

• Routers RV: personalized Services and QoS

  I have a few questions about the addition of personalized services and their use in QoS for RV routers (I use the RV220W)

  Suppose I have create a personalized as:

  Name: MyService

  Port: TCP 60000

  1 this port number is the port number used by my computer on the local network or the port number on the other side for example a computer on the Internet, I use this service to connect to? Some services use the same port number on the side that starts the service and the receiving end, but there are services that use different ports for the end of the initiator and receiver. So what is the significance of the port number when creating a custom service?

  Computer in the local network: (port TCP 60000) <---->Internet computer: (some the TCP port, not necessarily 60000)

  -or-

  Computer in the local network: (some the TCP port, not necessarily 60000) <---->Internet computer: (port TCP 60000)?

  2 suppose I have create a binding configuration of QoS profile for this service customized to a specific IP address on my local network. QoS is only applied on the outgoing network traffic. How will work this profile?

  A. applied to traffic from my LAN device with the IP address and the port TCP 60000

  -or-

  B. applied to traffic from my LAN device with the IP address specified to the port of the computer another TCP 60000?

  Thanks in advance

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  Panos, it should be your example.

  -Tom