Fonts: Selfhosting or Google much faster than Typekit/Edge?

It is much faster font free host or use Google instead of Typkit fonts?

I did a test by myself: my website http://DAS-werbeatelier.de now (since yesterday) use "Lato" Edge-Webfont.

I m sure, this isn't the right way to test, but I took 'Google Page speed Insight' with a result of 47 (mobile) (bad) and 58 (desktop).

Before yesterday the same website also used Lato - but as police auto-hébergées on my server.

The result of speed Page was: 51 (mobile) and 64 (desktop).

That's a significant difference - and it seems to be known.

https://www.keycdn.com/blog/Web-font-performance/Bildschirmfoto 2016-08-03 um 08.18.16.JPG

If this can be true? This means that, if you want a really fast site (-muse), Don t use Typekit oder Edge-Fonts?

On the other hand, it is very convenient to use Typekit/Edge with Adobe Muse...

I understand. 2 seconds "before opening" kill really!

Have you tried to pass on the new option I mentioned above?

Tags: Adobe Muse

Similar Questions

  • Responsiveness of Windows XP is much faster than Windows 7

    According to this video

    http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=Ay-gqx18UTM

    and MY personal experience, the xp desktop responsiveness is so much faster and less glitchy than windows 7 (e.g. open services.msc and play with the window, you will see black borders).

    You guys are going to solve this problem on Windows 8, to finally defeat xp in all aspects?

    Original title: why Microsoft, why?

    I have the same specification as Palcouk outside the video. Mine is a HD4250 integrated ATI and I get the black border.

    It may be safe to pin this one on the video card and drivers reasonbly

    Yes and also view the video uses Win 7, RTM, as in no current.

    I use two operating systems on Dells reasonably comparable...  I would say that in my experience 7 is faster than XP and not at all what I would call "glitch."
  • Why disable SuperFetch on ssd, if the RAM is much faster than the ssd?

    Directed by Microsoft that SuperFetch and PreFetch must be disabled, if the OS is installed on an ssd, in accordance with article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2727880. But SuperFetch is used for loading the data components of applications, which were very often used for RAM. Although the ssd is faster that a hard drive is not faster than the RAM. So, I do not understand why Microsoft suggest disabling this feature. The only reason why I want to understand, it's because of a limited RAM. If the RAM is sufficient beyond 6 GB, if we disable SuperFetch, then the boot time and increase the loading time of most used applications. I miss something here?

    The other question is about PreFetch. I feel, maybe wrong, it does the same thing with SuperFetch, with one major difference. It loads all the information data on the ssd or hard drive, instead of the RAM, in order to accelerate the launch of applications and time when the OS is installed on a hard drive to boot. If I'm right, let's disable the PreFetch it stores information for one ssd or hdd, while SuperFetch stores data of RAM information, which is much faster and so it must be enabled if there is a sufficient RAM.

    I look forward to reading the notice of a Microsoft software engineer.

    Hi Leventis,

    Prefetch copies frequently accessed files together into a contiguous on the disk area so that they can be located and loaded more quickly. That it takes a lot of old drives to recover data faster.

    SuperFetch predict what applications you run next and preload all the necessary data in the memory. She has also done that with startup files. And for all the three days he sends a defragmentation command to the OS drive that will cause problems in the SSD drives.

    In traditional hard drives (HDD) data are scattered throughout the disk, so that the operating system for access, it will take more time. It is suggested to perform a disk defragmentation. But storage technology is different in SSD, where, it records the data dynamically and it recovers more quickly. Who will be low down the burden on the RAM and the RAM can be used for uses such as for the opening of the games graphics high-end, etc..

    Hope this information is useful.

  • T500 T8700 processor work much faster than on the current of a battery!

    My colleagues and I are having a very annoying problem with our thinkpad t500 (approximately 200 laptops or more). the problem is that the CPU is intel core 2 duo T8700 2.53 ghz works only with 1.6 ghz speed on idle and load the State with alternating current and never jump higher than speed and jumps only to 2.53 ghz speed if and only if the battery is connected to the laptop, the laptop is faster using the battery that is strange indeed.

    My own opinion on this issue, it is that it is a bug in the bios that is the switching in a different way processor modes (processor with power supply ofc should be faster than with battery) I've already updated my bios of the laptop to 3.09 version, but always without success. The serial number of my laptop is "*".

    I hope that fix you this very soon.

    Moderator edit: number masked to prevent improper use.

    Hi mtaher and welcome to the Lenovo user community!

    Connected to a 65W power adapter, the T500 is relies on the battery to power during peak load. If you remove the battery, he's choking back the CPU at a level that the 65W adapter can handle alone. It probably won't happen if you use a 90W Adapter (I don't have anyone around to test - maybe someone can confirm).

    The research community and you will find this discussed many times - that's the behavior designed most of the models.

  • Why is the Nightly build of so much faster and has better quality than the final product of Firefox features?

    The Nightly build is so much faster than Firefox, and the download feature is much better than the download feature in Firefox.

    The arrow next to the home button will appear in the version of Firefox in Firefox 20. All the features that are in every night thereafter will appear in liberation, when they are ready.

  • Clean install of Windows a lot faster than the preinstalled system?

    My satallite comes with windows 64-bit installed.
    Since a lot of people suggested, here and elsehwere, a clean installation making consierably faster than the pre-installed windows (all bloated and unwanted software uninstalled with the uninstall program).

    Although fresh installtion was faster without drivers and programs, it has become more or less the same after installation of all software, etc. (perhaps a difference of 2 to 4% in the use of RAM) (over 4 GB)

    Is this normal or do others go much faster on any new install, for me, this effort has proved there is not a lot of use to do a clean install to drive retail.

    Ideas, wiers and feed back?

    See you soon

    Many pre-installed utilities are required for correct functionality and it can be a headache get these functions to work after installing a street copy of Windows.

    You will find that when you install Antivirus software on a street copy of Windows, it will happen similar to the pre-installed Windows installation. So if you want that the installation of Windows pre-installed perform better, uninstall the Antivirus should do the trick.

  • Is faster than the HP Mini 110 Microsoft Surface?

    My HP Mini 110 series netbook is SLOW and it is 2 years old and the Microsoft Surface seems newer, but I want to know if the Microsoft Surface would go faster (for example, loading programs and files, etc.)

    The HP Mini 110 has an Intel Atom processor and the Microsoft Surface has an ARM processor.

    The Microsoft Surface would be faster than the HP Mini 110?

    It must be such that it is a newer CPU, but until the Surface is in the hands of consumers, we do not have really the real world benchmarks. I am 100% sure that whatever that is released by Microsoft or others would show much faster and better in all aspects. But these are marketing people making conversation, not technicians running the real numbers.

  • Games run too fast! (Faster than normal around 1.5 x)

    Hey I have problems playing games since the installation of W7.

    I tried only two games, which is Half Life: counter-strike 1.6 through Steam and Batman Arkham Asylum.
    From what I see, I shoot and walk faster in CS 1.6, when I play on my own. But when I join a server on Steam, I go fast, Yes, and then I will be stuck (I guess because the server will try to match my speed with others)
    In Batman: AA, I was comparing Youtube videos with my game and found that my Batman works faster than in the videos.
    Here's my DX System Info:
    ------------------
    Information System
    ------------------
    Time of this report: 11/16/2009, 22:21:27
    Name of the computer: PC
    Operating system: Windows 7 Professional 32 - bit (6.1, Build 7600) (7600.win7_rtm. 090713-1255)
    Language: English (regional setting: English)
    System manufacturer: GBT___
    System model: AWRDACPI
    BIOS: Award BIOS v6.00PG Modular
    Processor: Intel (r) Core (TM) 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.1GHz
    Memory: 3072 MB RAM
    Available OS memory: 3072 MB RAM
    Page file: 1613MB used, 4527 MB of available space
    Windows Dir: E:\Windows
    DirectX version: DirectX 11
    DX setup parameters: not found
    DPI setting: Using System DPI
    System DPI setting: 96 DPI (100%)
    DWM DPI Scaling: disabled
    DxDiag Version: 6.01.7600.16385 32 bit Unicode
    I'm also running on a map of XFX9600GTXXX, with 8 x AA and AF, with Vsync off (must be turned off to reach 100 fps in CS, which I play competition)
    Tried solutions:
    I've been Googling for answers for almost 3 days without getting anything. I tried Winthrottle to slow down my CPU, defining my affinity proc at the base, and it does not work.
    (Although the speed improved to Batman, but running it on a carrot is terrible - did not work for CS)
    Turning on vsync seems to make it acceptable, but I'll be capped at 75 FPS.
    I need 100 fps on CS, because the response of the mouse is better.
    I was restoring my nvidia, same drivers try the new Forceware, nothing helps.
    I can't reformat my HD, but only not to do so due to college.
    These Core Dual optimizers, that I read are only for the amendments, I guess, so I can't do anything to this topic and it seems to be no fix.
    If anyone knows, I would like to know what is causing this = /

    It could well be your network drivers.  Even if you later, sometimes people writing the drivers need to improve for questions like yours that described and so you should keep a watch last updated driver.  On my laptop, for example, constantly Dell publishes new drivers for it that problems are discovered and updated correctly to handle Windows 7.  While it works great, they discover problems that may affect performance.

    Have you read anything in the counter-strike forums about anyone else having a similar problem?

  • Development of 2d - performance (much slower than 9000 9500) games


    Not really a player, I don't think it will be very useful, and it's entirely anecdotal, so I would not base your decisions on that, but maybe this will help you.

    Regarding the "power" of the various models of Blackberry, you could search the Internet, looking for the processor that is used as an indicator of the power.  BBs of Java didn't have (at least as I understand it) a graphics processor, then all the image processing is done on the main processor.

    You will find if you look at this page:

    http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_Bold

    that the 9000 has a 624 MHz Marvell Tavor PXA930, while you are looking for here:

    http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_Storm

    your Storm has a dual core CPU 400 MHz and ARM9 274 MHz ARM11

    Using the cycles in comparison, it would mean for me during the development of a game, it'll be quicker on the 9000 the storm, because I believe that the treatment of Java is in fact all is done on a single processor, if your painting will be restricted to the 400 Mhz on the storm.

    My experience is "BOLD" seems faster than the storm in general, but I actually always put that down to the bigger screen being slower to draw.

    In terms of processing power, the phone slower that I think you could develop to is in fact the storm, but actually I would not develop for it.  It has a system with a somewhat strange interface because of the screen push.  I would ignore this device and just concentrate on OS 5.0 devices.  To this end, the slower device is probably the Blackberry Curve 8520, with a 512 MHz processor.  I would get one of these for your tests.  Also, the (screen size, keyboard) form factor is shared by a large number of other phones.

    In general terms, my brief experience with treatment of the game showed me that if you want your game to go fast, be updated too little screen that you can.  So use 'regions' in your paint method to specify exactly which pieces on the screen should be updated.  In my tests, I tried to have a cursor to move around the screen using the trackpad.  If I moved the slider and then redisplays the whole screen, the performance has been extremely slow.  But if I just painted on the slider of the region it's in, and he painted in the apartment that he had moved, I got a slider action much, much more flexible.

  • Loudness Radar can run faster than real time?

    My apologies if this has been asked before - I couldn't find an answer to a search.

    Loudness Radar can run faster than real time? Making sure that my levels is ready for dissemination of a television show, I'll have to essentially play through the whole thing to get a global level. Is it possible to have the Loudness Radar go on and give me a general level without having to hit 'play' and go away for a while? I'd like to be able to do in the first, but I'm fine with the export of hearing if that's what it takes.

    I've never had a problem with just dropping the main level (make sure that the Loudness Radar is set to post fader, btw). So in your example, Yes, I turn down the master by 0.9db.

    Speaking of which, my new faster way to manage the volume on the content of the longer emissions must export just the audio format .wav temporary somewhere, then load this file in hearing and its volume tool to know the LKFS level. Then, I take whatever number I get and set the main volume in first to do no matter what level the station/deaf network/tv customer needs. It's a heck of a lot faster, since the hearing can analyze loudness faster than real-time. On 30 seconds, commercials, using the Loudness Radar in Premiere Pro's no big deal, but dealing with half-hour TV series, with the help of hearing on export to .wav is much faster.

  • Does anyone else have a problem with the left speaker is much lower than the right?

    Any source that I use the left speaker is much lower than the left. If I put my finger on the right I can feel the pressure of air pushed but not by the left. Is it an iPhone defective 7?

    Hello, TopDog16!

    Welcome to congratulations on getting a new iPhone and Apple support communities 7.  From what I see in your post, you have any questions on the stereo speakers in your new iPhone.  I would be happy to help you with that!

    Indeed, your iPhone has holes on both right and left sides on the lower edge (on each side of the connector of the Lightning).  The holes on the right are only speaker on this edge of the phone, however.  The other speaker in the pair is at the top of the phone, where the cut is, just above the screen.  Check here to see if sound comes out.

    This page has a large diagram of the iPhone of 7 speakers (in the section entitled "Buttons and external connectors"): iPhone 7 - technical specifications

    Have a great rest of your week!

  • Very important question! Why my Apple wireless keyboard better and much stronger than my midi keyboard?

    I have a Yamaha psr-330 midi keyboard

    I have an Akai mpk261midi keyboard

    I have an Alesis v61 midi keyboard

    they all sound the same in Logic Pro X, I can barely hear the sound of the piano, the pressure sensitivity is out of whack, I basically just plug and play midi keyboards and use software instruments without changing anything in Logic Pro X... why does my little Apple Wireless (bluetooth, remember) clearer keyboard better, more responsive and much stronger than any general midi keyboard? its embarrassing to say the least!

    I have the volume to the maximum one time and even raised the gain on the software instrument "Piano Steinway tail" and still barely, I could hear a noise...

    Please help me I have no other solution... IV ' e tasted its best thanks to a computer keyboard dang, how is this possible?

    How can I get my midi keyboards sound as good as my computer wireless keyboard?

  • Why is developer of Firefox more stable and faster than ordinary Firefox?

    So, I have some great experiences with regular Firefox. It works great themes, beautiful, good plugins, security etc., but there is one thing that bothers me in Firefox on ALL computers on EACH operating system. Whenever I have install Firefox, it is already slow, he stutters sometimes and sometimes it freezes. And this isn't just my problem because many of my friends and classmates using Chrome right now they complain about the speed of Firefox. Now, for me it is not a problem, I'm not a patient person, but it certainly is the browser that will protect my privacy rather than Chrome.

    Recently, somewhere, I saw download link saying something like "Developer Mozilla, for people like you", or something like, I installed and the man, the browser is like 10 x faster than regular Firefox AND Chrome AND Safari, I mean, this speed is outrageous! It's great, no sarcasm!

    I don't get, why is so slow regular Firefox and Firefox Developer so frickin' fast? Why? Perhaps, you can base your next update of Firefox to the developer of Firefox?

    Sincerely in love with developer of Mozilla Firefox. * muah *.

    Firefox Developer Edition is a version of Firefox. So what you see in the developer edition is coming out to regular Firefox in about 12 weeks (we releases every 6 weeks, and Dev edition is two versions before publication)

    Dev Edition also uses a fresh profile, which may be faster than your old profile which is full of old data.

  • Why google chrome faster loading of the pages more beta version browser to firefox?

    Google chrome faster loading

    We are still working on the contribution of Firefox for Android better. We welcome your comments and advice. Please visit idea box to leave more!

  • Why Chrome load websites faster than Firefox

    I can load a website at least two times faster than Firefox Chrome. Why?

    Hello

    The reset Firefox feature can solve a lot of problems in restaurant Firefox to its factory default condition while saving your vital information.
    Note: This will make you lose all the Extensions, open Web sites and preferences.

    To reset Firefox, perform the following steps:

    1. Go to Firefox > help > troubleshooting information.
    2. Click on the button 'Reset Firefox'.
    3. Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is finished, it will display a window with the imported information. Click Finish.
    4. Firefox opens with all the default settings applied.

    Information can be found in the article Firefox Refresh - reset the settings and Add-ons .

    This solve your problems? Please report to us!

    Thank you.

Maybe you are looking for